Re: [board-discuss] Decidim startup proposal

2022-02-18 Thread Uwe Altmann

Hi Emiliano

Many many thanks for bringing this forward!

One thing I'd like to amend, even if I feel it is not necessarily suited to 
be integrated into the proposal yet:
Everybody wanting to use such a tool (no matter which one of the mentioned) 
must realize that this will not work out without permanent professional 
(means: educated and work intensive) moderation. We must consider that in 
every discussion.

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Uwe Altmann

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Decidim startup proposal

2022-02-18 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi Simon,

Simon Phipps wrote:
> So I still think it would be worth asking around to see if there is
> another open source community using Decidim/Consul/LiquidFeedback in
> their governance who can share their experiences. I can do that if
> you want or there are others here who participate in the Open Source
> Foundations mailing list who could do so.
>
Not speaking for Emiliano, but I would very much appreciate you trying
to make those connections. TIA!

I know Bjoern (in Cc) had some first-hand experience at least with
LiquidFeedback, so perhaps he can also provide input.

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [board-discuss] Drafting Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance"

2022-02-18 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi Florian,

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:35:01AM +0100, Florian Effenberger 
 wrote:
> are we fine with publishing the tender in that state, any further edits
> before we proceed with tendering that?

One part that confuses me (but I'm not native) is the "some or more"
wording: does it mean "one or more" or something else?

Otherwise it looks reasonable to me: the full list of tasks is obviously
more than the resource limit you have at the end, but as long as the
wording allows bidders to only offer a subset, this looks fine.

Thanks,

Miklos

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy