What's to read?

2009-09-21 Thread Doug Pensinger
I just finished reading a bio of the Sun King, Louis XIV of France.  I
was inspired to read it after having read The Three Musketeers which
actually took place during the reign of 14's father (maybe) Louis XIII
and by Stephenson's Baroque Cycle which I actually finished a few
years ago.

TTM was a surprisingly good read.  I didn't understand (maybe detect
is a better word) the humor at first.  I practically gave up on the
book when the musketeers proved to be such bumbling idiots that they
almost got themselves and d'Artagnan caught and killed, but once I
understood that the character flaws of these most contemptible heroes
was actually a large part of the story I began to enjoy the book.

The bio was somewhat cursory, but that's what I was looking for anyway
(and what should I expect for a dollar?)  Louis XIV was an interesting
character and held the throne for 72 years; longer than any other
European monarch.  That he was a despot, a war monger and genocidal
(see the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes) was offset by his
centralization of power in France, the sophistication and innovation
of his court.  Interesting stuff.

Next is a History of England by Scottish philosopher David Hume and
Bank's new non-culture S.F. novel, Transition.

What has everyone else been reading?

BTW, I can't recommend the Kindle enough.  The interface is great, the
wireless feature gives you access to all sorts of stuff much of which
is free or very reasonably priced, you can download magazines,
newspapers and blogs and you can even send personal documents to it
via email for a small fee (I paid 15 cents for a 10 or 12 page
document).  It has a built in dictionary; just move the cursor in
front of the word you want defined and the definition appears at the
bottom of the screen.  You can annotate text and there's a search
function and you can change the font size.  I bought a flip-over cover
(not the one sold by Amazon) that allows me to set the reader down and
read hands free.  It's much easier to read than a regular book -
especially a hardback.  The $300 price tag was a bit steep.  I wasn't
sure I wanted one, especially at that price, but I'm very happy with
it now.

Doug

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Wife's suggestion!

2009-09-21 Thread Chris Frandsen

My wife suggested this. I always go along with her ideas:-)

learner

Begin forwarded message:

Hey! Let’s circulate a request for common courtesy and civility  
between individuals and groups with opposing ideas.


 I don’t know about you, but I have become increasingly concerned  
about the verbiage and rage Americans are expressing to and about  
one another.  Verbal abuse and physical attacks send a damaging  
message of hostility to our youth and demolish our image to the rest  
of the world.


 We can and will disagree, which makes us stronger if we remember  
that we are all Americans. It’s acceptable to disagree—to not  
even like one another (including our president).  Let’s not confuse  
freedom of speech with human decency.  Just because an action is  
legal does not make it ethical.


 Bottom line—We profess to be a Christian nation.  It is  
appropriate to ask, “What would Jesus say and do?”  I imagine he  
disagreed with the actions of those cheating tax collectors and  
adulterous women he befriended.  Yet, we have no record of him  
calling them names, swearing at them, or making degrading  
comments.   Amazingly, we even have evidence that Jesus loved his  
enemies.


 The challenge is to disagree with dignity, intelligence and  
respect.  If you think this is a worthwhile message, please forward  
it to others.


Barbara Frandsen
219 Fleck
ba...@stedwards.edu


Life is short, Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love  
truly, Laugh uncontrollably, And never regret anything that made you  
smile.



 Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we  
should dance.  unknown author



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: What's to read?

2009-09-21 Thread Chris Frandsen


On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Doug Pensinger wrote:


BTW, I can't recommend the Kindle enough.  T


I am using the Kindle app on the iphone and just finished a Baxter  
SciFi/Alternate history book.

Best electronic book interface I have seen so far!

learner

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Wife's suggestion!

2009-09-21 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Chris Frandsen relayed:
Bottom line—We profess to be a Christian nation.  It is appropriate  
to ask, “What would Jesus say and do?”  I imagine he disagreed with  
the actions of those cheating tax collectors and adulterous women he  
befriended.  Yet, we have no record of him calling them names,  
swearing at them, or making degrading comments.   Amazingly, we even  
have evidence that Jesus loved his enemies.


Some think this is a Christian nation, others think it's a secular  
nation whose majority religion happens to be Christianity, and there  
is much to debate in terms of what exactly constitutes a Christian.


And some believe that Christianity implies morality and ethical  
behavior, and that its absence is necessarily immoral and unethical ..  
and some believe otherwise.  Some even believe the opposite.


That being said, there's a lot to be said for cultivating civility,  
whether the motivation to be civil is religious or otherwise.  And as  
someone who is as far from church going Christian as it's possible  
to be and still live on this planet, I have to say that Jesus set a  
good example, and there's solid reasoning behind his teachings that is  
far above the petty little sects fighting over miniscule differences  
in apocryphal doctrine.  ;)


Can't we all just get along?



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Wife's suggestion!

2009-09-21 Thread Michael Harney

Chris Frandsen wrote:

My wife suggested this. I always go along with her ideas:-)

learner

Begin forwarded message:

Hey! Let’s circulate a request for common courtesy and civility 
between individuals and groups with opposing ideas. 

 I don’t know about you, but I have become increasingly concerned 
about the verbiage and rage Americans are expressing to and about one 
another.  Verbal abuse and physical attacks send a damaging message 
of hostility to our youth and demolish our image to the rest of the 
world. 

 We can and will disagree, which makes us stronger if we remember 
that we are all Americans. It’s acceptable to disagree—to not even 
like one another (including our president).  Let’s not confuse 
freedom of speech with human decency.  Just because an action is 
legal does not make it ethical.


 Bottom line—We profess to be a Christian nation.  It is appropriate 
to ask, “What would Jesus say and do?”  I imagine he disagreed with 
the actions of those cheating tax collectors and adulterous women he 
befriended.  Yet, we have no record of him calling them names, 
swearing at them, or making degrading comments.   Amazingly, we even 
have evidence that Jesus loved his enemies.


 The challenge is to disagree with dignity, intelligence and 
respect.  If you think this is a worthwhile message, please forward 
it to others.




I respectfully disagree.  Not in appealing to people to be respectful in 
disagreements, but in appealing to the religious What would Jesus do? 
to do so.  Rationality promotes calm debate.  Sadly, religion is not 
conducive to rationality.  Rather religion and religious belief promotes 
the irrational and rejection of the rational (IE: 
Creationism/Intelligent Design vs Evolution).  No, appealing to ones 
irrational beliefs doesn't promote rational debate.


Oh, as for an example of Jesus not respectfully disagreeing, call to 
your recollection what Jesus did to the vendors in the temple.  I 
believe it had something to do with shouting, throwing over tables, 
smashing merchandise and even wielding a whip.  It's been a while 
though, so I may be a little cloudy on the details.


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



RE: What's to read?

2009-09-21 Thread Pat Mathews

I have a Sony 505. The books on my reader are on my reader and on my desktop, 
not on my account on someone else's server. If anyone wants to delete them 
[think 1984] or whatever, they have to physically steal my reader and then 
delete the book. I own them outright. Nobody else has any rights in the copies 
I own except, in this state, if I had a legally married spouse. (Community 
property state). 

No one gonna take my 505 away  

http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/







 Subject: Re: What's to read?
 From: lear...@mac.com
 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:12:46 -0500
 To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
 
 
 On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Doug Pensinger wrote:
 
  BTW, I can't recommend the Kindle enough.  T
 
 I am using the Kindle app on the iphone and just finished a Baxter  
 SciFi/Alternate history book.
 Best electronic book interface I have seen so far!
 
 learner
 
 ___
 http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
 
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



RE: Wife's suggestion!

2009-09-21 Thread Pat Mathews

Amen. I second, third, or thousandth the motion. 

Pat


http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/







From: lear...@mac.com
Subject: Wife's suggestion!
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:09:36 -0500
To: brin-l@mccmedia.com



My wife suggested this. I always go along with her ideas:-)
learner
Begin forwarded message:Hey! Let’s circulate a request for common courtesy and 
civility between individuals and groups with opposing ideas.  I don’t know 
about you, but I have become increasingly concerned about the verbiage and rage 
Americans are expressing to and about one another.  Verbal abuse and physical 
attacks send a damaging message of hostility to our youth and demolish our 
image to the rest of the world.  We can and will disagree, which makes us 
stronger if we remember that we are all Americans. It’s acceptable to 
disagree—to not even like one another (including our president).  Let’s not 
confuse freedom of speech with human decency.  Just because an action is legal 
does not make it ethical. Bottom line—We profess to be a Christian nation.  It 
is appropriate to ask, “What would Jesus say and do?”  I imagine he disagreed 
with the actions of those cheating tax collectors and adulterous women he 
befriended.  Yet, we have no record of him calling them names, swearing at 
them, or making degrading comments.   Amazingly, we even have evidence that 
Jesus loved his enemies. The challenge is to disagree with dignity, 
intelligence and respect.  If you think this is a worthwhile message, please 
forward it to others.Barbara Frandsen219 fleckba...@stedwards.edu

Life is short, Break the rules, Forgive quickly, Kiss slowly, Love truly, 
Laugh uncontrollably, And never regret anything that made you smile.

 Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we should 
dance.  unknown author
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: What's to read?

2009-09-21 Thread John Williams
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Pat Mathews mathew...@msn.com wrote:

  I have a Sony 505. The books on my reader are on my reader and on my
 desktop, not on my account on someone else's server. If anyone wants to
 delete them [think 1984] or whatever, they have to physically steal my
 reader and then delete the book.


That Kindle book deletion thing was a debacle, but Amazon has promised not
to do it again, and I tend to believe them, since it caused such an outcry
and they don't want that kind of bad press again.

For the cautious, Kindle content can be backed up to a computer. I'm not
sure what would have happened if someone had 1984 backed up, and then copied
it back to their Kindle, with the wireless on, a few days after the original
deletion order came through. Of course, you can turn the wireless off and
then restore the backup, and it is impossible for Amazon to do anything
until you turn wireless back on.

But hopefully none of that is necessary in the future. I just want to see
the book selection increase. It still boggles my mind why so few books
released before the Kindle, but in the last 30 years or so, have come out in
Kindle or other e-book formats. Someone must have a digital copy of the book
text somewhere, and it is trivial to convert it to the Kindle or ebook
formats. It seems like free money for someone.

By the way, have you investigated how the book selection compares for Kindle
vs. your Sony 505? Particularly with science fiction titles?

I'm still waiting for Brin to release the various Startide books on Kindle.
___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Wife's suggestion!

2009-09-21 Thread Chris Frandsen


On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Michael Harney wrote:



I respectfully disagree.  Not in appealing to people to be  
respectful in disagreements, but in appealing to the religious What  
would Jesus do? to do so.  Rationality promotes calm debate.   
Sadly, religion is not conducive to rationality.  Rather religion  
and religious belief promotes the irrational and rejection of the  
rational (IE: Creationism/Intelligent Design vs Evolution).  No,  
appealing to ones irrational beliefs doesn't promote rational debate.


Oh, as for an example of Jesus not respectfully disagreeing, call  
to your recollection what Jesus did to the vendors in the temple.  I  
believe it had something to do with shouting, throwing over tables,  
smashing merchandise and even wielding a whip.  It's been a while  
though, so I may be a little cloudy on the details.



On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Bruce Bostwick wrote:

Some think this is a Christian nation, others think it's a secular  
nation whose majority religion happens to be Christianity, and there  
is much to debate in terms of what exactly constitutes a Christian.


And some believe that Christianity implies morality and ethical  
behavior, and that its absence is necessarily immoral and  
unethical .. and some believe otherwise.  Some even believe the  
opposite.


That being said, there's a lot to be said for cultivating civility,  
whether the motivation to be civil is religious or otherwise.  And  
as someone who is as far from church going Christian as it's  
possible to be and still live on this planet, I have to say that  
Jesus set a good example, and there's solid reasoning behind his  
teachings that is far above the petty little sects fighting over  
miniscule differences in apocryphal doctrine.  ;)


Can't we all just get along?


A referral to Religion without being specific often sparks a  
response on this list. My wife is not a follower so she did not write  
this with this illustrious group in mind. Guys, I suggest taking her  
to task on this is part of the problem. There are many out there with  
religious beliefs be they Christian or otherwise. Being civil means  
respecting their beliefs though not necessarily accepting them.


I agree with Bruce that in general lessons ascribed to Jesus are about  
love and acceptance of the other.  I ascribe to them.  As for the  
temple I believe that was more about the failings of organized  
religion but of course that is my interpretation I also am a bit cloudy.


learner

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Wife's suggestion!

2009-09-21 Thread Dave Land

On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Chris Frandsen wrote:

A referral to Religion without being specific often sparks a  
response on this list. My wife is not a follower so she did not  
write this with this illustrious group in mind. Guys, I suggest  
taking her to task on this is part of the problem. There are many  
out there with religious beliefs be they Christian or otherwise.  
Being civil means respecting their beliefs though not necessarily  
accepting them.


Amen, brother! I think that the harsh immune response from some  
quarters to the merest mention of religion is a symptom of our general  
inability to be generous, kind, civil, open and _listening_.


Most of us who hold that some religious practices and ideas have a  
valuable place in our society don't even find it necessary to go into  
an allergic reaction when our very beliefs -- which we introduce to  
the conversation in good faith (the secular meaning of that phrase) --  
are attacked.


It is not necessary to compare George Bush or Barack Obama to Hitler  
in order to say that we disagree with their policies. It is not  
necessary to call people with religious beliefs addled or deluded  
in order to say that we choose not to believe as they do.


I agree with Bruce that in general lessons ascribed to Jesus are  
about love and acceptance of the other.  I ascribe to them.  As for  
the temple I believe that was more about the failings of organized  
religion but of course that is my interpretation I also am a bit  
cloudy.


You seem to remember and understand the teachings and stories of Jesus  
better than you think. Jesus' main complaint was about the hypocrisy  
of the Jewish leadership: making a big show of their faithfulness  
while ignoring their own God's commands to be generous to the poor, to  
take care of the strangers in their midst, etc.


Thank you for introducing this thread, and please tell your wife (for  
me, anyway) that she's welcome to couch her hopes for a gentler dialog  
in religious or rational terms as she feels fit.


Blessings,

Dave


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: What would Jesus say and do

2009-09-21 Thread hkhenson
I suspect he would be looking deeply into evolutionary psychology to 
understand what drives strife.


It is fairly clear what causes the problems.  It is fairly clear what 
we need to do about them.  But it is really unlikely that people will.


Keith


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com