MS Ride

2010-02-22 Thread Jon Louis Mann
 Thanks again to all who sponsored me.  
 Charlie.

Good on you, Charlie!~)


  

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Today's EE/Physics homework assignment . . .

2010-02-22 Thread Dave Land

On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:


http://thereifixedit.com/2010/02/20/epic-kludge-photo-resistance-is-futile/


Beats the heck out of a trip to the hardware store, if you happen to  
have a bag of those things hanging around. How else are you gonna use  
up 50 identical resistors?


Dave



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Social solutions rather than engineering ones

2010-02-22 Thread Dave Land

On Feb 21, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Michael Harney wrote:


Keith Henson wrote:

I am appalled (though not surprised) that people on this list who
don't have any answers suggest it might just require the end of
wasteful materialism and joke about soylent green.



I agree, how dare they!  Except, I don't remember anyone saying that.


I do:

On Feb 18, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:


Keith Henson wrote:


If we don't solve the energy problem as many as 6 out of 7 people
will *die* in famines and resource wars.


Where will they live?

(I am a member of a tribe. Global civilization can go stuff itself.)


Trent has opined similarly in the past, with a tone that says that a
significant human die-off is perfectly acceptable to him. On at least
one occasion, I believe he was invited to go first. I am of neither the
opinion that such a die-off is acceptable nor that he should be first in
line.

Dave

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Today's EE/Physics homework assignment . . .

2010-02-22 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Feb 22, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Dave Land wrote:


On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:


http://thereifixedit.com/2010/02/20/epic-kludge-photo-resistance-is-futile/


Beats the heck out of a trip to the hardware store, if you happen to  
have a bag of those things hanging around. How else are you gonna  
use up 50 identical resistors?


Dave


Can't quite tell if they're all identical, though, or what the exact  
value is.  (The color codings look like they're using several  
ambiguous values of almost-brown, almost-red, or maybe orange.)


-b, who once actually used to do that kind of thing for a day job



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: national security and climate change

2010-02-22 Thread John Garcia
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Charlie Bell char...@culturelist.orgwrote:


 On 22/02/2010, at 11:34 AM, john...@gmail.com wrote:

  The US Army's Strategic Studies Institute has a number of papers
 addressing national security issues related to climate change. AFAIK, they
 are available for free as PDF downloads. Go here,
  http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?PubID=862
  to see one published in August 2008. Food for thought, eh?

 Yes. I've read most of that lot in the past.

 But it's still a hoax, apparently. *sigh*

 Charlie.
 ___
 http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com


Indeed.

john
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Not ready

2010-02-22 Thread Michael Harney
I thought I was ready to come back here.  I was wrong.  I was too 
damaged by the last few years of my life working in a job that I was ill 
suited for but had to do to make ends meet.  I'll come back when I 
relearn patience. 


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Not ready

2010-02-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Michael Harney wrote:

 I thought I was ready to come back here.  I was wrong.  I was too 
 damaged by the last few years of my life working in a job that I was 
 ill suited for but had to do to make ends meet.  I'll come back when 
 I relearn patience.

Why do you think learning patience is _easier_ off-line than 
on-line? At least here your occasional bursts of impatience 
will not be met by a punch in the nose :-)

Alberto Monteiro


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: national security and climate change

2010-02-22 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Charlie Bell wrote:
 
 The US Army's Strategic Studies Institute has a number of
 papers addressing national security issues related to
 climate change. AFAIK, they are available for free as
 PDF downloads. Go here,
 http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?PubID=862
 to see one published in August 2008. Food for thought, eh?
 
 Yes. I've read most of that lot in the past.
 
 But it's still a hoax, apparently. *sigh*

What is a hoax? Anthropogenic Global Warming?

Alberto Monteiro


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Species oscillation

2010-02-22 Thread Jon Louis Mann
 I am appalled (though not surprised) 
 that people on this list who  don't 
 have any answers suggest it might just
 require the end of wasteful materialism
 wasteful materialism and joke about 
 soylent green.

 Energy hungry synthetic nitrogen is the 
 reason for something between 1/3 and 1/2
 of crop yield.  The ending of famines in
 Europe was the result of railroads more
 than any other factor.  This allowed grain
 to be shipped from places with good crops 
 to places where the crops had failed. 
 Railroads allowed cities to grow, and 
 cities do far less ecological damage than
 spread out humans.
 you have lots of people not only saying
 it is not possible, but directly arguing 
 that a human die-back is more desirable
 than cheap energy. 


 I agree, how dare they!  Except, I don't 
 remember anyone saying that.  I remember 
 some people suggesting alternate energy 
 sources, I remember someone talking about solar.
 As far as I remember, no suggested the end of  
 wasteful materialism.  I did suggest that we 
 may have to be a little more efficient about  
 our energy use and make some compromises 
 I certainly  don't remember anyone calling for
 the dying off of the population. 
 
 the majority of American crops are used to feed 
 livestock, not people.  

 Nothing says that that energy has to come from 
 coal, it can just as easily come from nuclear 
 power, solar power, wind power.  If we shift 
 away from fossil fuels and towards another 
 primary power source, that won't stop the 
 production of Ammonium Nitrate.

 Nuclear power is just as cheap as coal  
 in the long term renewable sources average 
 out to about the same cost as coal...

 If you think so little of the people on this 
 list as to equate them with typical blog 
 posters, then why are you here? Learn quickly, 
 straw men arguments don't go well on this list 
 so treating us like we aren't as smart as you
 or setting up straw men to knock down is not 
 going to convince a one of us.  Most of us are 
 in science related fields and almost all are 
 card-carrying skeptics.


 Trent has opined similarly in the past, with a
 tone that says that a significant human die-off 
 is perfectly acceptable to him. I am of neither 
 the opinion that such a die-off is acceptable, 
 nor that he should be first in line.

I agree that railroads have contributed to ending 
famines in Europe, and they are becoming much less 
destructive to the environment than other means 
of transportation and distribution.  Advances in the 
technology of food production have also contributed 
to the growth of populations, not only of humans, but 
of domesticated meat stocks, which does not result 
in feeding more people, but in some people consuming 
more biomass...

I am not suggesting that the green revolution was a 
bad thing.  I also recognize that developed countries 
are experiencing reduced population growth.

However, I make no apology for suggesting that human 
civilization could collapse, unless we can somehow 
reduce excessive waste, pollution, conspicuous consumption 
and materialistic greed.  To quote Larry Niven out of 
context, Think of it as evolution in action.  

When any species overpopulates, or despoils its own 
habitat, it can contribute to its own decimation, or even 
extinction.   We humans are fouling our own nest, and 
if we don't do something to repair the damage, we may 
suffer the consequences.  

I don't have the arrogance to claim I know how to solve 
the problems related to climate change and overpopulation, 
etc.  Nor do I claim that they are solely the result of 
human population, industry and agribusiness, etc.  I do 
believe human civilization is a factor, and our success 
in adapting our planet to feed a population that has 
tripled in my lifetime, has to have an effect on the 
ecological equilibrium, habitats, and other species' 
survival.

So it goes...
Jon Mann



  

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Not ready

2010-02-22 Thread Charlie Bell

On 23/02/2010, at 3:25 AM, Michael Harney wrote:

 I thought I was ready to come back here.  I was wrong.  I was too damaged by 
 the last few years of my life working in a job that I was ill suited for but 
 had to do to make ends meet.  I'll come back when I relearn patience. 

Oh? I think your responses have been fair enough so far.

Charlie.
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: national security and climate change

2010-02-22 Thread Charlie Bell

On 23/02/2010, at 4:07 AM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 
 Charlie Bell wrote:
 
 The US Army's Strategic Studies Institute has a number of
 papers addressing national security issues related to
 climate change. AFAIK, they are available for free as
 PDF downloads. Go here,
 http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?PubID=862
 to see one published in August 2008. Food for thought, eh?
 
 Yes. I've read most of that lot in the past.
 
 But it's still a hoax, apparently. *sigh*
 
 What is a hoax? Anthropogenic Global Warming?

That is what I was alluding to, that there is a significant portion of the 
population (including those in positions of power) that doubt global warming 
and even claim it to be a hoax. To be clear, I'm not one of them.

Charlie.


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Patience

2010-02-22 Thread Jon Louis Mann
 Michael Harney wrote:
 I thought I was ready to come back here.  
 I was wrong.  I was too damaged by the 
 last few years of my life working in a job 
 that I was ill suited for but had to do to 
 make ends meet.  I'll come back when I
 relearn patience.

Michael, what job is it that's so draining?  
I am learning tolerance and patience by 
interacting on the brinlist.  I lost an 
incredible job that I really loved, took 
another I was ill suited for, lost that, 
got another job I loved and lost that.  I'm 
under employed now and work when I can. 
I've learned from those experiences to stop 
feeling melancholy, take the best, and 
disregard the rest.  I don't go to bars, 
smoke tobacco, go on dates, or eat in 
expensive restaurants, etc. I use net  
flix instead of cable, now, read lots of 
books and use the free library  wifi.  
Life is good...


  

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Patience

2010-02-22 Thread Nick Arnett
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Jon Louis Mann net_democr...@yahoo.comwrote:



 Michael, what job is it that's so draining


FYI, folks, he signed off the list right after posting his message, so don't
expect answers.

Nick
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Unsolvable and beyond compromise.

2010-02-22 Thread Trent Shipley
http://alturl.com/s5id


Republicans would have to be suicidal idiots to play ball with Obama and
the Democrats on health care reform.   They all involve increased
interference by the Federal Government in the health care market, which
is a cultural no-no in America.  (Leaving people uninsured is also a
no-no.  Basically, health care reform runs afoul  deeply held
contradictory cultural values.  It is not a problem for which there is a
satisfactory political compromise.)



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Social solutions rather than engineering ones

2010-02-22 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dave  wrote:

 Trent has opined similarly in the past, with a tone that says that a
 significant human die-off is perfectly acceptable to him. On at least
 one occasion, I believe he was invited to go first. I am of neither the
 opinion that such a die-off is acceptable nor that he should be first in
 line.

I haven't figured him out yet and it is possible that he is
indecipherable, but I'm pretty sure that Trent's enigmatic posts
aren't always what you think they might be.

Doug

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Unsolvable and beyond compromise.

2010-02-22 Thread Doug Pensinger
Trent wrote:

 Republicans would have to be suicidal idiots to play ball with Obama and
 the Democrats on health care reform.   They all involve increased
 interference by the Federal Government in the health care market, which
 is a cultural no-no in America.  (Leaving people uninsured is also a
 no-no.  Basically, health care reform runs afoul  deeply held
 contradictory cultural values.  It is not a problem for which there is a
 satisfactory political compromise.)

Hopefully their intransigence will backfire.

Doug

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Unsolvable and beyond compromise.

2010-02-22 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Feb 22, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Trent Shipley wrote:


http://alturl.com/s5id


Republicans would have to be suicidal idiots to play ball with Obama  
and

the Democrats on health care reform.   They all involve increased
interference by the Federal Government in the health care market,  
which

is a cultural no-no in America.  (Leaving people uninsured is also a
no-no.  Basically, health care reform runs afoul  deeply held
contradictory cultural values.  It is not a problem for which there  
is a

satisfactory political compromise.)


Until the cultural values change.  Which I believe is happening.

The people who are against federal government interference in the  
health care market are *not* the people who are against leaving people  
uninsured and at the mercy of profit-based health care systems.  The  
former are a dwindling, if increasingly vocal and still somewhat  
better connected, minority, and the latter are a disorganized but  
increasingly savvy majority, and sooner or later that balance will tip  
one way or the other .. and I see it ultimately tipping in favor of  
strengthening the safety net for people that a purely profit-driven  
health care system tends to let fall through the cracks.  Maybe I'm  
too optimistic, but that's how I see it.


This conflict has many other aspects, though, and runs far deeper than  
just the health care debate ..




___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Patience

2010-02-22 Thread Charlie Bell

On 23/02/2010, at 7:39 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:

 
 
 On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Jon Louis Mann net_democr...@yahoo.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 Michael, what job is it that's so draining
 
 FYI, folks, he signed off the list right after posting his message, so don't 
 expect answers.

Shame. 

C.
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com