Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
On 19 Sep 2011, at 01:37, Nick Arnett wrote: Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. Nick On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ronn! Blankenship ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net wrote: Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do something about it? TIA! (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help to anyone . . . ) snip Nick I'm not getting all Brin-L messages?! I never got the thread below (Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!), checkend my spambox but they're not there! At 01:17 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Matt Grimaldi wrote: Ticia wrote: B-Society: proposing an alternative to the 9-5 society, taking into account the needs of the 25% of us who are evening types (night owls). That sounds good! If there was a chapter in L.A., I would want to join! -- Matt They meet at Joe's sushi bar downtown starting at 8:00 AM. . . . ronn! :) Sunrise is Nature's way of telling you it's bedtime. LOL I know there'd be kindred spirits on here! There's some preliminary reseach linking creativity and high IQ with eveningness (though I personally know some exceptions to that so it's not conditional or anything ;)) Ticia ',:) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Ticia ti...@xs4all.nl wrote: Nick I'm not getting all Brin-L messages?! I never got the thread below (Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!), checkend my spambox but they're not there! That's just weird. Could you check the archive page now and then and let me know if there seems to be any pattern to what's not arriving? Nick ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do something about it? TIA! (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help to anyone . . . ) At 01:50 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, postmas...@cenit.de wrote: X-Apparently-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net via 67.195.15.74; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:22 -0700 Received-SPF: none (domain of fgateway09.isp.att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-YMailISG: RzwF44oWLDu8LZBgzXsfOTA5LUtndaFOMzyYUK3vJhsZ3THi Xs2ICe3wr8v2Rb1eEvRHKhbirhpihiKzA3SxZ5r8sG.T7W2fB0z8N_vcUQLa bX9j8PKcUlzUiZCa_YPoAZeWZu3To9B6T23_oJJs.9j0.56BfJILojsBKBI2 pH2Q1wkGnmuVkhtZFg_as_f7QUTIsUsnmQQCHzxFrH5ARd_nZ._FJVDo85xK 5AWKZ4DlOTvNR9uz94k1EgjZFrcLYN4796s1UKBoujqt6XNI.gRth_CNVtFw s7SdPMkYq_8lBRJwbSZ1LZrn7DNPVvZxcojIipWuth5zsJaP1ipt2LnSRUN3 EgsjmyMeEd6HmKXWvNuuZXxlMHzSZ2F5FjO2JytKGw72QSVGPdQ1F.CjfDOt AV793n5CvHDlk6qmzeNthNTBbzkwboiE23GOlRt2O8KpZ6cFQHEtvZuJuBtt FjCcAvWYzONx1MWxtPEKwricOz7QwghdC2a2qAAkAAV5.g-- X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] Authentication-Results: mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=cenit.de; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=cenit.de; dkim=neutral (no sig) Received: from 207.115.11.39 (EHLO fgateway09.isp.att.net) (207.115.11.39) by mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:20 -0700 Received: from cenit.de (ns2.cenit.de[193.188.158.4]) by isp.att.net (frfwmxc09) with ESMTP id 20110918185019M0900jhlfke; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:50:19 + X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] Received: from mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com ([10.0.2.156]) by ns2.cenit.de (cenit.de [192.168.232.3]) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.3) with ESMTP id md50003484517.msg for ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) id p8IIo9BI023663 for ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 From: postmas...@cenit.de To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 0001 - 80040546 Message-ID: vralp2inz1...@exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01CC68D12B729BBE1B70exf?de02.de.ceni VBR-Info: md=cenit.de; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org; X-Spam-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.2.156 X-Return-Path: X-Envelope-From: X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net X-MDAV-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:57 +0200 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. a.freib...@cenit.de Reporting-MTA: dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com Arrival-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Received: from mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com ([10.0.2.155]) by exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) id p8IIo8e0008854 for a.freib...@cenit.de; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:08 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Report: * -4.7 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.] * 0.0 REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM Qualcomm/Eudora doesn't do quoting like this Authentication-Results: cenit.de spf=pass smtp.mail=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com; sender-id=pass header.sender=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com; dkim=neutral header.d=bellsouth.net (1:-4:DKIM_SIGNATURE_BAD_BUT_TESTING); Received-SPF: pass (cenit.de: domain of brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com designates 67.222.54.6 as permitted sender) x-spf-client=MDaemon.PRO.v9.6.3 receiver=cenit.de client-ip=67.222.54.6 envelope-from=brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com helo=oproxy6-pub.bluehost.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 353868.49966...@omp1006.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1316371793; bh=ArJuP1kl+YBn7HvI4uhdp18H4NmMwveC+c01OCYL1Zg=; h=Message-ID:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-Mailer:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type;
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
At 04:48 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Ronn! Blankenship wrote: Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do something about it? I see Ticia also wondered the same pretty thing at much the same moment, and was nice enough to not try to be as helpful as I was . . . :( And apparently Dan answered my question in the negative . . . :(:( Oh, well . . . . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. Nick On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ronn! Blankenship ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net wrote: Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do something about it? TIA! (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help to anyone . . . ) At 01:50 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, postmas...@cenit.de wrote: X-Apparently-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net via 67.195.15.74; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:22 -0700 Received-SPF: none (domain of fgateway09.isp.att.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-YMailISG: RzwF44oWLDu8LZBgzXsfOTA5LUtnda**FOMzyYUK3vJhsZ3THi Xs2ICe3wr8v2Rb1eEvRHKhbirhpihi**KzA3SxZ5r8sG.T7W2fB0z8N_vcUQLa bX9j8PKcUlzUiZCa_**YPoAZeWZu3To9B6T23_oJJs.9j0.**56BfJILojsBKBI2 pH2Q1wkGnmuVkhtZFg_as_**f7QUTIsUsnmQQCHzxFrH5ARd_nZ._**FJVDo85xK 5AWKZ4DlOTvNR9uz94k1EgjZFrcLYN**4796s1UKBoujqt6XNI.gRth_CNVtFw s7SdPMkYq_**8lBRJwbSZ1LZrn7DNPVvZxcojIipWu**th5zsJaP1ipt2LnSRUN3 EgsjmyMeEd6HmKXWvNuuZXxlMHzSZ2**F5FjO2JytKGw72QSVGPdQ1F.CjfDOt AV793n5CvHDlk6qmzeNthNTBbzkwbo**iE23GOlRt2O8KpZ6cFQHEtvZuJuBtt FjCcAvWYzONx1MWxtPEKwricOz7Qwg**hdC2a2qAAkAAV5.g-- X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] Authentication-Results: mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=cenit.de; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=cenit.de; dkim=neutral (no sig) Received: from 207.115.11.39 (EHLO fgateway09.isp.att.net) (207.115.11.39) by mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:20 -0700 Received: from cenit.de (ns2.cenit.de[193.188.158.4]) by isp.att.net (frfwmxc09) with ESMTP id 20110918185019M0900jhlfke; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:50:19 + X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4] Received: from mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.**comhttp://mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com([10.0.2.156]) by ns2.cenit.de (cenit.de [192.168.232.3]) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.3) with ESMTP id md50003484517.msg for ronn_blankenship@bellsouth.**netronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.**comhttp://mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.com(8.13.8/8.13.8) id p8IIo9BI023663 for ronn_blankenship@bellsouth.**netronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 From: postmas...@cenit.de To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 0001 - 80040546 Message-ID: VralP2InZ1a4a@exf-de02.**de.cenit-group.comvralp2inz1...@exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_**01CC68D12B729BBE1B70exf?** de02.de.ceni VBR-Info: md=cenit.de; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org; X-Spam-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.2.156 X-Return-Path: X-Envelope-From: X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net X-MDAV-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:57 +0200 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. a.freib...@cenit.de Reporting-MTA: dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.**comhttp://exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-**group.comhttp://mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com Arrival-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Received: from mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.**comhttp://mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com([10.0.2.155]) by exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200 Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.**comhttp://mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.com(8.13.8/8.13.8) id p8IIo8e0008854 for a.freib...@cenit.de; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:08 +0200 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPTO_QUOTE_** QUALCOMM autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Report: * -4.7 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.] * 0.0 REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM Qualcomm/Eudora doesn't do quoting like this Authentication-Results: cenit.de spf=pass smtp.mail=brin-l-bounces@**mccmedia.combrin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com ; sender-id=pass header.sender=brin-l-bounces@**mccmedia.combrin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com ; dkim=neutral header.d=bellsouth.net (1:-4:DKIM_SIGNATURE_BAD_BUT_* *TESTING); Received-SPF: pass (cenit.de: domain of brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com designates 67.222.54.6 as permitted
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
At 06:37 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Nick Arnett wrote: Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Yep. I get it every time I send a message to the list, and it sounds like everybody else does, too . . . Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. Thanks! . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
RE: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Well, I got it, and since I didn't see my Reply message to the list pop up, I figured there was smeting wrong and it wouldn;t take my reply. http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/ Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:00:42 -0500 To: brin-l@mccmedia.com From: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net Subject: Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights! At 06:37 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Nick Arnett wrote: Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this. Yep. I get it every time I send a message to the list, and it sounds like everybody else does, too . . . Shouldn't happen. I'll figure it out and stop it. Thanks! . . . ronn! :) ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
I DON'T get such messages when sending on the list. -- Matt___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Me neither. Hi Ticia, good to hear from you. Doug On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Matt Grimaldi matzeb...@yahoo.com wrote: I DON'T get such messages when sending on the list. -- Matt ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
Okay, I removed the problem address... shouldn't happen any more. Nick ___ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
