[Bug binutils/872] strip segv
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-25 07:34 --- Created an attachment (id=463) -- (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=463action=view) testcase -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/872] strip segv
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:50 --- Patch applied - case closed -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/872] strip segv
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:26 --- Hi Pawe³, The seg fault was caused by a silly fault in the name_list handling code inside the copy_archive() function. The 'obfd' field was not being initialised to a proper value. The attached patch fixes this problem and allows your test case to run, although it still generates the Invalid operation message. Do you have any problems with this patch or shall I close this PR ? Cheers Nick binutils/ChangeLog 2005-04-25 Nick Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR872 * objcopy.c (copy_archive): Initialise 'obfd' field of new name_list structure. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
