[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:04 --- Created an attachment (id=1213) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1213action=view) Check for a tree node with no section specified -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:05 --- Hi H.J. I am probably wrong, but this looks like a simple case of a missing check for a NULL pointer. The uploaded patch for example allows your test case to link successfully. What do you think ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Summary| --sort-section name is |--sort-section name is |brorken |brorken http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 15:14 --- I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things, wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests today. I think one of them may fail with your patch. I posted a patch at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-08/msg00080.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 15:59 --- Subject: Re: --sort-section name is brorken Hi H.J. I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things, wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests today. I think one of them may fail with your patch. I posted a patch at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-08/msg00080.html Ah - right - please consider that patch approved. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3006] --sort-section name is brorken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 16:09 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
