> Le 2 janv. 2023 à 09:54, fester...@posteo.net a écrit :
>
> On 02.01.2023 05:12, fester...@posteo.net wrote:
>> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile
>> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories):
>>(string-ref "my string" -3)
>> gdb's backtrace is the following:
>> #0 0x77f1bcc5 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #1 0x77f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #2 0x77e97b29 in scm_apply_0 ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #3 0x77f15966 in scm_throw ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #4 0x77f174e9 in scm_ithrow ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #5 0x77e94735 in scm_error_scm ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #6 0x77e94790 in scm_error ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #7 0x77ee19e7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #8 0x77ee208b in scm_to_uint64 ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #9 0x77f1c5e4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #10 0x77f26c49 in scm_call_n ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #11 0x77e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #12 0x77e99a86 in scm_eval ()
>> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #13 0x77ef91c6 in scm_shell () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #14 0x77ea865c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #15 0x77e91f6a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #16 0x77f194e8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #17 0x77f26c49 in scm_call_n () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #18 0x77e936ea in scm_call_2 () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #19 0x77f42292 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #20 0x77f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #21 0x77e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #22 0x77f14b89 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #23 0x77c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1
>> #24 0x77f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #25 0x77eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from
>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1
>> #26 0x510f in ?? ()
>> #27 0x77c9918a in __libc_start_call_main
>> (main=main@entry=0x50b0, argc=argc@entry=1,
>> argv=argv@entry=0x7fffe0b8) at
>> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
>> #28 0x77c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x50b0,
>> argc=1, argv=0x7fffe0b8, init=, fini=> out>, rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7fffe0a8) at
>> ../csu/libc-start.c:381
>> #29 0x51aa in ?? ()
>
> Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug.
> Therefore this should be closed.
>
>
>
