Re: Bug-Report libtool-1.5.20

2005-11-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues 
[ I have put the bug-libtool list in Cc: again ]

Hi Christof,

* Nuber, Christof wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:26:41AM CET:
 Von: Ralf Wildenhues
  * Nuber, Christof wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:44:52AM CET:
  
   I tried to run make check for libtool-1.5.20 on a Linux-2.4.21-37
   ELsmp-Kernel (RedHat WS 3.6) on a HP xw 9300 (2x AMD Opteron 275),
   x64_86-Processor.  5 (mdemo-make.test, pdemo-inst.test,
   pdemo-exec.test, mdemo2-exec.test, tagdemo-exec.test) of 109 tests
   failed, 3 (mdemo-exec.test, mdemo-inst.test, demo-nopic.test) were
   not run.

  Thank you for the bug report.  We need a bit more information.

 I couldn't reconstruct the bug. It occured while I was upgrading m4,
 libtools, autoconf and automake (in that order). After upgrading
 autoconf and automake I didn't get the message anymore. Sorry that I
 can't give you more information.

Well, if you could tell us which the previous installed autoconf and
automake versions were, that would likely be enough information to
reproduce the bug.  Then we can decide whether we need to do something
about it.  Thank you.

For the next upgrade round, it's probably more advisable to upgrade
autoconf before automake before libtool.  OTOH, given that m4-2.0
will likely depend on libtool-2.0, and autoconf's next major version 
*may* depend on m4-2.0, this can't be said for certain, *iff* you
are upgrading CVS versions which need bootstrapping.  If you instead
download tarballs, or simply upgrade from some packaging system, you
should be fine either way.

Cheers,
Ralf


___
Bug-libtool mailing list
Bug-libtool@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Re: Bug-Report libtool-1.5.20

2005-11-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues 
Hi Chris,

* Nuber, Christof wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:44:52AM CET:
 
 I tried to run make check for libtool-1.5.20 on a Linux-2.4.21-37
 ELsmp-Kernel (RedHat WS 3.6) on a HP xw 9300 (2x AMD Opteron 275),
 x64_86-Processor.
 5 (mdemo-make.test, pdemo-inst.test, pdemo-exec.test,
 mdemo2-exec.test, tagdemo-exec.test) of 109 tests failed, 3
 (mdemo-exec.test, mdemo-inst.test, demo-nopic.test) were not run.
 
 If you need more information (which I assume), please let me know.

Thank you for the bug report.  We need a bit more information.
Please rerun verbosely, like this:
  make check VERBOSE=x 21 | tee checklog

and send the log, preferably packed with bzip2 or gzip.
If you want to avoid rerunning all tests, you can limit yourself
to the corresponding test groups; most libtool tests are supposed to be
run in groups: for example, this
  TESTS=mdemo-conf.test mdemo-make.test mdemo-exec.test mdemo-inst.test 
mdemo-unst.test
would be one test group; it is important whether mdemo-conf or
mdemo-static or mdemo-shared ran before the failing mdemo-make test.

Thanks,
Ralf


___
Bug-libtool mailing list
Bug-libtool@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool