Best bet for appending querystring parameters to all links rendered under some condition?
So I'm writing a view-component that outputs some performance information, and I'm also looking at the CombineJS component that there's a patch for. I want to be able to launch an action in a MonoRail site in debug mode - which would mean the performance view- component would render as opposed to not, and the CombineJS component would not minify JS or strip comments, so that it's possible to read and step-through if necessary. So, I thought I'd add a debug=1 conditional. Fine, easy. Then I thought that, while I'm in debug mode, it would be nice if everywhere I navigated to would also be in debug mode, so I don't have to keep adding it to URLs and refreshing. What is my best bet for doing that? I guess an AfterRendering filter that parses for hrefs and so on, and then if it finds any, appends in my debug=1? I think my other possibility is maybe subclassing the UrlHelper? What do you think? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Best bet for appending querystring parameters to all links rendered under some condition?
why not use the DEBUG precompiler var? On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:36 AM, petemounce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm writing a view-component that outputs some performance information, and I'm also looking at the CombineJS component that there's a patch for. I want to be able to launch an action in a MonoRail site in debug mode - which would mean the performance view- component would render as opposed to not, and the CombineJS component would not minify JS or strip comments, so that it's possible to read and step-through if necessary. So, I thought I'd add a debug=1 conditional. Fine, easy. Then I thought that, while I'm in debug mode, it would be nice if everywhere I navigated to would also be in debug mode, so I don't have to keep adding it to URLs and refreshing. What is my best bet for doing that? I guess an AfterRendering filter that parses for hrefs and so on, and then if it finds any, appends in my debug=1? I think my other possibility is maybe subclassing the UrlHelper? What do you think? -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Want to do a fancy sum in an active Record query
AFAIK there is no CASE in HQL. But since you're querying values, not
objects, I'd rather go for a SQL query in your case.
-Markus
2008/12/4 M Kenyon II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am doing a report that sums hours for several employees, based on a
grouping per week. I want to find how much overtime is being spent.
So, I want 2 values, a sum of all time, and a sum of just the
overtime.
I was thinking of doing a case statement, like in SQL, but I'm not
sure how to do it in active record.
I currently have a query like this:
ClassificationRequest.Append(@
select
trn.Week,
dtl.Section.IDhttp://dtl.section.id/
,
dtl.Category.IDhttp://dtl.category.id/
,
sum(dtl.Hours),
year(trn.Date)
fromTransactionDetail dtl
inner join
dtl.Transaction trn
inner join trn.Badge
bdg
inner join
bdg.District dst
where
bdg.Classification.ID http://bdg.classification.id/ = :ID);
if (region 0)
{
ClassificationRequest.Append(@
and dst.Region.ID http://dst.region.id/ =
:RegID
);
}
if (district 0)
{
ClassificationRequest.Append(@
and dst.ID = :DistID
);
}
ClassificationRequest.Append(@ and
trn.Date between :start AND :end
group by
dtl.Category.IDhttp://dtl.category.id/
,
trn.Week,
bdg.Classification.IDhttp://bdg.classification.id/
,
dtl.Section.IDhttp://dtl.section.id/
,
trn.Date
);
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Castle Project Users group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Best bet for appending querystring parameters to all links rendered under some condition?
Because sadly I've never known code deployed in production that hasn't needed debugging of some sort ;-) On Dec 5, 9:07 am, Ken Egozi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why not use the DEBUG precompiler var? On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:36 AM, petemounce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm writing a view-component that outputs some performance information, and I'm also looking at the CombineJS component that there's a patch for. I want to be able to launch an action in a MonoRail site in debug mode - which would mean the performance view- component would render as opposed to not, and the CombineJS component would not minify JS or strip comments, so that it's possible to read and step-through if necessary. So, I thought I'd add a debug=1 conditional. Fine, easy. Then I thought that, while I'm in debug mode, it would be nice if everywhere I navigated to would also be in debug mode, so I don't have to keep adding it to URLs and refreshing. What is my best bet for doing that? I guess an AfterRendering filter that parses for hrefs and so on, and then if it finds any, appends in my debug=1? I think my other possibility is maybe subclassing the UrlHelper? What do you think? -- Ken Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Best bet for appending querystring parameters to all links rendered under some condition?
Yes; I like that approach. Thanks. On Dec 5, 9:19 am, Alex Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not either create a debug cookie or a some debug session data after the first instance, rather then take the brute force approach of rewriting every url... then just using ?debug=0 to later remove the debug cookie/debug session variable? I would think you could keep all the logic in a single filter then... On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:36 PM, petemounce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I'm writing a view-component that outputs some performance information, and I'm also looking at the CombineJS component that there's a patch for. I want to be able to launch an action in a MonoRail site in debug mode - which would mean the performance view- component would render as opposed to not, and the CombineJS component would not minify JS or strip comments, so that it's possible to read and step-through if necessary. So, I thought I'd add a debug=1 conditional. Fine, easy. Then I thought that, while I'm in debug mode, it would be nice if everywhere I navigated to would also be in debug mode, so I don't have to keep adding it to URLs and refreshing. What is my best bet for doing that? I guess an AfterRendering filter that parses for hrefs and so on, and then if it finds any, appends in my debug=1? I think my other possibility is maybe subclassing the UrlHelper? What do you think? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: AR with Multiple DB´S
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i have thinking... is not a better choice create a public class MultiBaseInterceptior : IInterceptor ??? and in moment of persistence, change the DB? someone here, know's which method from IInterceptor will be the better to implement the change??? This sounds like a pretty insane idea to me. Basically - you've done all your logic/validation using one DB and then you want to write the actual changes to another. I guess if you want all your reads to happen from one DB and all your writes to happen to another - then it's possible this isn't bad idea. Generally - you're going to get FK constraint errors, duplicate keys and all sorts of problems if you go this path (and it's not exactly what you want). j. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Castle Project Users group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
