[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 thunderbird - security update

2007-10-21 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0981

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0981.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.5.el4.centos.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0980-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386 seamonkey security update

2007-10-21 Thread John Newbigin

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the
centos mirror:

RHSA-2007:0980-01 Critical: seamonkey security update

Files available:
seamonkey-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm
seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.6.el2.c2.1.i386.rpm

More details are available from the RedHat web site at
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html

The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches
is to run:
# yum update

--
John Newbigin
Computer Systems Officer
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies
Swinburne University of Technology
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin








___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-es] VSFTPD

2007-10-21 Thread Freddy Angulo
Hola amigos:
   
  Una consulta hay alguna manera en la q se pueda limitar el espacio en disco a 
cada usuario virtual con vsftpd.  He configurado mi server y todo funciona a la 
perfecccion, pero quisiera saber si a cada uuario puedo darle espacio de disco 
distinto a cada uno.
   
   
   
  Gracias por sus respuestas 

   
-

¡Sé un mejor ambientalista!
Encuentra consejos para cuidar el lugar donde vivimos en:
http://telemundo.yahoo.com/promos/mejorambientalista.html___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS] arp corrupted

2007-10-21 Thread Bobby
Hi,

I've been trying to get a couple of routers up after h/w failure.

The border router is an OpenBSD firewall running NAT between the Internet and 
a DMZ like subnet, and in that a Linux antivirus server is running NAT to the 
LAN. 

When the client does a DNS query it reaches to the f/w where dns is running 
and is returned into the A/V server but never hits the 0.254 interface. 
(Shown by running tcpdump on each interface.)

(Internet)
|
OpenBSD Firewall 
NAT 192.168.1.254
|
192.168.1.253 eth0
Anti-Virus in DMZ
192.168.0.254 eth1
|
192.168.0.11
Client on LAN

The routing table on the A/V server is:
 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0  0 eth0
 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.254   255.255.255.0   UG0 0  0 eth1
 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0 0  0 eth1
 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0  0 eth1
 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254   0.0.0.0 UG0 0  0 eth0

Sitting on the A/V server one can reach the client without problem.

Arp shows:
 Address HWtype  HWaddress   Flags MaskIface
 192.168.1.254ether   00:20:78:0F:AC:31   C eth0

Unless I try to reach the client web server from the A/Vserver, then it fails 
and arp says:

 Address  HWtype  HWaddress   Flags MaskIface
 corp.domain.com  (incomplete)  eth0
 dell11.domain.com  ether   00:06:29:AF:A3:67   C eth1
 192.168.1.254ether   00:20:78:0F:AC:31   C   eth0

One can also see the arp requests go out on eth 0 rather than eth1:

 arp who-has 192.168.0.10 tell 192.168.0.254

Pinging works well:

 PING 192.168.0.11 (192.168.0.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
 64 bytes from 192.168.0.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.277 ms

Iptables on the A/V server says:

*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 9080
-A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 110 -j REDIRECT --to-port 9110
-A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 25 -j REDIRECT --to-port 9025
-A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 21 -j REDIRECT --to-port 9021
COMMIT
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:Firewall-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT
COMMIT

It is supposed to route all outbound traffic through the various ports where 
the A/V s/w is listening.

ifconfig shows:

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:0D:88:39:6A:F1
  inet addr:192.168.1.253  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::20d:88ff:fe39:6af1/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:77670 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:97635 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:523 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:22858238 (21.7 MiB)  TX bytes:21513745 (20.5 MiB)
  Interrupt:11 Base address:0x2400

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:FC:AC:52:4B
  inet addr:192.168.0.254  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::250:fcff:feac:524b/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:26676 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:20424 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:1 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:2747567 (2.6 MiB)  TX bytes:26324006 (25.1 MiB)
  Interrupt:7 Base address:0x2800

If NAT did not work I could see it having a problem. It appears to be happy 
routing icmp but not tcp. cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward shows 1 which it 
would have to anyway since the request goes out from the LAN.


-- 

Bobby
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing Skype in CentOS (4.4)

2007-10-21 Thread Andrew Allen
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:56 -0700, Steven Vishoot wrote:
 --- Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm trying to install Skype on a CentOS 4.4 system
  and I've followed the
  instructions on the Skype website at
 
 http://www.skype.com/download/skype/linux/repositories.html
  but when I run yum install skype it fails with a
  whole string of error
  messages, ending with 
  Error: failure:
  RPMS/libsigc++20-2.0.17-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm from
  rpmforge:
  [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
  
  Has anybody managed to install skype successfully -
  if so, how please?
  
  Thanks,
  Andy
  
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  
 You can try yum clean all and retry yum install. Just
 a thought.
 
 Steven
  
 
 Get your Art Supplies @ www.littleartstore.com

Thanks Steven,
After I did yum clean all, yum install skype got a lot further and
looked as if it was going to work! But then it failed on

Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libQtCore.so.4 is needed by package skype
Error: Missing Dependency: qt4-x11 = 4.2 is needed by package skype
Error: Missing Dependency: libQtGui.so.4 is needed by package skype
Error: Missing Dependency: libQtDBus.so.4 is needed by package skype
Error: Missing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.4) is needed by
package skype
Error: Missing Dependency: libQtNetwork.so.4 is needed by package skype
Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by package
skype

So how do I resolve this missing dependency problem using yum please?

Andy

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 32, Issue 13

2007-10-21 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 3 s390(x)  seamonkey - security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)
   2. CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 thunderbird Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   3. CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64   thunderbird Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   4. CESA-2007:0979 Critical CentOS 5 i386 firefox Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   5. CESA-2007:0979 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox   Update
  (Karanbir Singh)
   6. CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey - security
  update (Johnny Hughes)
   7. CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey - security
  update (Johnny Hughes)
   8. CESA-2007:0979 Critical CentOS 4 i386 firefox -   security
  update (Johnny Hughes)
   9. CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64   thunderbird -
  security update (Johnny Hughes)
  10. CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird - security
  update (Johnny Hughes)
  11. CESA-2007:0979 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security
  update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 20:01:50 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0980 Critical CentOS 3 s390(x)
seamonkey - security update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0980

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0980.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.5.el3.centos3.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071020/ea1a1867/attachment-0001.bin

--

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:06:21 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 5 i386
thunderbird Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0981 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0981.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
eef5e3aee6c06595fab8b84f5ce6e826  thunderbird-1.5.0.12-5.el5.centos.i386.rpm

Source:
606dae9d14ff437283f7e5e35302457a  thunderbird-1.5.0.12-5.el5.centos.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:06:23 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0981 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64
thunderbird Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0981 Moderate

Upstream 

[CentOS] new freenx and nx RPMS released, manual action for x86_64

2007-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
There are new RPMS released for nx and freenx in the CentOS-4 and
CentOS-5 Extras repository.

I normally do not announce that here, as those can easily be obtained on
a normal yum upgrade/update, however in this case there are special
actions required *_IF_* you have the x86_64 architecture for either
CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 with the current versions of nx and freenx installed.

The freenx and nx in the x86_64 tree were i386 versions prior to this
release because the nomachine code would not compile on x86_64.  This
release fixes that and the new versions are x86_64 RPMS and no longer
i386.  This means that YUM will not update the currently installed i386
RPMS that are installed on x86_64 machines.

=
*_ATTENTION_*
=

If you are running nx and freenx on x86_64, to get these upgraded you
*_MUST_*:

1. Manually download the x86_64 RPMS from these location:

CentOS-5:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/extras/x86_64/RPMS/freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/extras/x86_64/RPMS/nx-3.0.0-4.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

CentOS-4:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/extras/x86_64/RPMS/freenx-0.7.1-1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/extras/x86_64/RPMS/nx-3.0.0-4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm

2. Manually install these two RPMS with this command (as root from
within the directory where you downloaded them):

rpm -Uvh freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
nx-3.0.0-4.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

(that command is all one line if it wraps on your e-mail)

=

I apologize for the manual update requirement, however yum will not
update i386 packages with x86_64 ones.

Again ... this is *_ONLY_* required if you have the prior released i386
versions of nx and freenx installed on the X86_64 arch of either
CentOS-4.x or CentOS-5.x.

If you are using the i386 architecture of CentOS-4.x or CentOS-5.x then
you can just upgrade via yum normally.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] new freenx and nx RPMS released, manual action for x86_64

2007-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
Johnny Hughes wrote:
 There are new RPMS released for nx and freenx in the CentOS-4 and
 CentOS-5 Extras repository.
 
 I normally do not announce that here, as those can easily be obtained on
 a normal yum upgrade/update, however in this case there are special
 actions required *_IF_* you have the x86_64 architecture for either
 CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 with the current versions of nx and freenx installed.
 
 The freenx and nx in the x86_64 tree were i386 versions prior to this
 release because the nomachine code would not compile on x86_64.  This
 release fixes that and the new versions are x86_64 RPMS and no longer
 i386.  This means that YUM will not update the currently installed i386
 RPMS that are installed on x86_64 machines.
 
 =
 *_ATTENTION_*
 =
 
 If you are running nx and freenx on x86_64, to get these upgraded you
 *_MUST_*:
 
 1. Manually download the x86_64 RPMS from these location:
 
 CentOS-5:
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/extras/x86_64/RPMS/freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/extras/x86_64/RPMS/nx-3.0.0-4.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
 
 CentOS-4:
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/extras/x86_64/RPMS/freenx-0.7.1-1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/extras/x86_64/RPMS/nx-3.0.0-4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm

*_FORGOT A STEP_*

1a. Remove the current nx and freenx with this command:

rpm -e nx freenx

 
 2. Manually install these two RPMS with this command (as root from
 within the directory where you downloaded them):
 
 rpm -Uvh freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
 nx-3.0.0-4.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
 
 (that command is all one line if it wraps on your e-mail)
 
 =
 
 I apologize for the manual update requirement, however yum will not
 update i386 packages with x86_64 ones.
 
 Again ... this is *_ONLY_* required if you have the prior released i386
 versions of nx and freenx installed on the X86_64 arch of either
 CentOS-4.x or CentOS-5.x.
 
 If you are using the i386 architecture of CentOS-4.x or CentOS-5.x then
 you can just upgrade via yum normally.
 
 Thanks,
 Johnny Hughes
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 64bit to support ICH9

2007-10-21 Thread David Hrbáč
Hi,
Well, ICH9 support for CentOS as announced on Oct 16th by me
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-October/088104.html has
been extended. Today I have published x86_64 install DVD. You can find
it here: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/pub/ich9/
Regards,
David Hrbáč
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf file disappeared

2007-10-21 Thread Lanny Marcus
On 28 July, I changed from ProtectBase to Priorities. I kept unusually
detailed notes that day. Yesterday, when I added the RPMForge respository,
so I could install MPlayer, I found that the
/etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf file no longer exists. I'm not sure
how that happened. Question: Is there a way to regenerate that file? TIA
-- 
Lanny
-
Over 800 Magazine titles up to 80% off
http://lowcostmagazines.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf file disappeared

2007-10-21 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lanny Marcus wrote:
 On 28 July, I changed from ProtectBase to Priorities. I kept unusually
 detailed notes that day. Yesterday, when I added the RPMForge
 respository, so I could install MPlayer, I found that the
 /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf file no longer exists. I'm not
 sure how that happened. Question: Is there a way to regenerate that
 file? TIA
 -- 
 Lanny

That file does not change often from the default ... you can get the
default version by downloading the RPM in question and using this
command in the directory where you put it:

rpm2cpio yum-priorities-1.0.4-2.el5.centos.noarch.rpm | cpio -idv

After that, there will be a bunch of files in that same directory ...
which are the default files that get installed.

That file should be one of them, andat
tempdir/etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] arp corrupted

2007-10-21 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Bobby wrote:
 Unless I try to reach the client web server from the A/Vserver, then it fails 
 and arp says:
 
  Address  HWtype  HWaddress   Flags MaskIface
  corp.domain.com  (incomplete)  eth0
  dell11.domain.com  ether   00:06:29:AF:A3:67   C eth1
  192.168.1.254ether   00:20:78:0F:AC:31   C   eth0
 
 One can also see the arp requests go out on eth 0 rather than eth1:
 
  arp who-has 192.168.0.10 tell 192.168.0.254

Put 

net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_filter = 1

into your /etc/sysctl.conf

and run (for the time being) 

sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_filter=1

Linux implements the weak host model, so packages are accepted on any
interface, *if* the traffic is directed at the host.

When arp is used, this model doesn't always work. That's why you should
use the sysctl setting above.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpgKVEpCV072.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] arp corrupted

2007-10-21 Thread Bobby
On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:26:35 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_filter=1

That stops the AVserver from answering arp requests.

-- 

Bobby
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] arp corrupted

2007-10-21 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Bobby wrote:
 On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:26:35 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
  sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_filter=1
 
 That stops the AVserver from answering arp requests.

Now that is *strange*.

Can you look with tcpdump what happens on the network?

tcpdump -i any arp 

should do that.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgpyFmn11j1pJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] arp corrupted

2007-10-21 Thread Bobby
On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:11:15 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 Bobby wrote:
  On Sunday 21 October 2007 13:26:35 Ralph Angenendt wrote:
   sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_filter=1
 
  That stops the AVserver from answering arp requests.

 Now that is *strange*.

 Can you look with tcpdump what happens on the network?

 tcpdump -i any arp

 should do that.

 Cheers,

 Ralph

That's what I've been doing for a couple of days. The requests goes 
unanswered. I'm monitoring all the NICs and can follow it in real time.

I sniffed it to see if there were any clues but all is totally standard IP. 


-- 

Bobby
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS upgrade in Xen domU?

2007-10-21 Thread Mike Edwards
I'm running into a slight problem trying to upgrade a CentOS 4.4
install to 5.0.

The configuration:
CentOS 4.4 is an old install that used to boot natively.  That has
since been backed up and restored to two seperate LVs (as the original
install had two partitions).  The host system now runs Debian, and I've
been able to successfully boot the old CentOS 4.4 install under Xen
(with a Debian domU kernel, but that's besides the point).

I've decided to upgrade the CentOS domU to CentOS 5.  After determining
that the recommended upgrade path is to do so via the installer, I
grabbed the CentOS installer kernel/ramdisk and configured my domU to
boot from those.  The installer comes up without a problem.

Things get hairy when the installer takes a look at the 'disks'.  I
receive the following message:
/dev/xvda currently has a loop partition layout.  To use this disk for
the installation of CentOS, it must be re-initialized, causing the loss
of ALL DATA on this drive.

It looks like the installer doesn't like the fact that there are no
partitions (which is correct, as the 'disk' is actually a logical
volume under lvm).  As I'm trying to do an upgrade, and not blow away
my existing setup, this isn't going to work.

My question, therefore, is - how do I tell the CentOS 5 installer to
ignore the fact that there are no partitions, and to simply do the
install?  As mentioned previously, the CentOS domU does boot perfectly
fine, and given the prevalence of volume groups, logical volumes and
virtual machines these days, it seems rather silly to have an installer
absolutely rely on the existence of partitions before it'll let one do
an upgrade or install.


-- 
  
Mike Edwards|   If this email address disappears,   
Unsolicited advertisments to|   assume it was spammed to death.  To
this address are not welcome.   |   reach me in that case, s/-.*@/@/

Our progress as a nation can be no swifter than our progress in education.
The human mind is our fundamental resource.
  -- John F. Kennedy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing Skype in CentOS (4.4)

2007-10-21 Thread Steven Vishoot

--- Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:56 -0700, Steven Vishoot
 wrote:
  --- Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I'm trying to install Skype on a CentOS 4.4
 system
   and I've followed the
   instructions on the Skype website at
  
 

http://www.skype.com/download/skype/linux/repositories.html
   but when I run yum install skype it fails with a
   whole string of error
   messages, ending with 
   Error: failure:
   RPMS/libsigc++20-2.0.17-1.el4.rf.i386.rpm from
   rpmforge:
   [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
   
   Has anybody managed to install skype
 successfully -
   if so, how please?
   
   Thanks,
   Andy
   
   ___
   CentOS mailing list
   CentOS@centos.org
   http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
   
  You can try yum clean all and retry yum install.
 Just
  a thought.
  
  Steven
   
  
  Get your Art Supplies @ www.littleartstore.com
 
 Thanks Steven,
 After I did yum clean all, yum install skype got a
 lot further and
 looked as if it was going to work! But then it
 failed on
 
 Finished Dependency Resolution
 Error: Missing Dependency: libQtCore.so.4 is needed
 by package skype
 Error: Missing Dependency: qt4-x11 = 4.2 is needed
 by package skype
 Error: Missing Dependency: libQtGui.so.4 is needed
 by package skype
 Error: Missing Dependency: libQtDBus.so.4 is needed
 by package skype
 Error: Missing Dependency:
 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.4) is needed by
 package skype
 Error: Missing Dependency: libQtNetwork.so.4 is
 needed by package skype
 Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is
 needed by package
 skype
 
 So how do I resolve this missing dependency problem
 using yum please?
 
 Andy
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
it looks like you need qt4.2 or higher, but i do not
know how that is going to affect the rest of your
system if you install that package.

Steven
 

Get your Art Supplies @ www.littleartstore.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Postfix dropping settings CentOS4.5

2007-10-21 Thread Feizhou

Johnny Massengill wrote:

My company is using Trend Micro InterScan Messaging Security Suite 7.0
for linux. This setup uses Postfix as a mail gateway for MS Exchange.
The problem I'm having is ever so often Postfix 2.2.11 will lose the
Transport mapping lookup tables setting. When this happens, mail into
our domain will stop being relayed to our Exchange server.



What mapping tables are those? mysql? ldap? ???

This has never happened with me whether cdb, berkely db or mysql for 
thousands of domains in a previous job at an ISP (older version) and nor 
do I have any such problem with postfix 2.2.11 which I currently run in 
my current place of work.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] test

2007-10-21 Thread Christopher Chan

Please excuse me.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] restrict network access

2007-10-21 Thread umair shakil
Salam,

Squid actually Proxy will do the trick

Regards,

Umair Shakil
ETD

On 10/19/07, Arne Pelka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 I have two pc using centos 4, these machines need only access to the
 (big, class b) local network. Because of security reasons the network
 access should be restricted to this local network - mainly the users
 of these pc should not be able to access webpages outside of the local
 network. My problem is, that I have no own centos repository and
 therefore these two pc need access to the centos mirrors to get updates.
 What would be the best way to restrict the network access to the local
 network and allow the access to some external addresses (a centos
 mirror and maybe some other servers/websites).
 I was thinking about iptables but I'm not very experienced in this
 questions - maybe there is an easier way. The configuration with
 iptables seems to be very complex, I was skimming through some
 tutorials and the man pages.

 In thanks and with best reagrds,
 Arne



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] freenx problem with the most recent updates

2007-10-21 Thread Joachim Backes

When running yum update on monday, oct 22, I get the following conflicts:

Transaction Check Error:
  file /etc/nxserver/node.conf.sample from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with 
file from package freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos
  file /usr/bin/nxkeygen from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with file from 
package freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos
  file /usr/bin/nxloadconfig from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with file from 
package freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos
  file /usr/bin/nxnode from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with file from package 
freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos
  file /usr/bin/nxprint from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with file from package 
freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos
  file /usr/bin/nxserver from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with file from 
package freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos
  file /usr/bin/nxsetup from install of freenx-0.7.1-1.el5.centos conflicts with file from package 
freenx-0.6.0-12.el5.centos


Known?

Regards

--
Joachim Backes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Kaiserslautern,Computer Center [RHRK],
Systems and Operations, High Performance Computing,
D-67653 Kaiserslautern, PO Box 3049, Germany
--
Phone: +49-631-205-2438, FAX: +49-631-205-3056
http://hlrwm.rhrk.uni-kl.de/home/staff/backes.html


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos