Re: [CentOS-es] RV: emulate_httpd_log on
Hector Martínez Romo wrote: Estimados La opción emulate_httpd_log on no me funciona, la fecha y hora en el access.log no sale en el formato deseado, si bien uso sarg para ver los log de squid, me gustaría poder verlos también directamente en el access.log pero con un formato de hora y fecha entendible. ¿Qué puede ser? estas seguro que funciona eso como vos pensas? esto es lo que dice la ayudad emulate_httpd_log. Este parámetro define si se desea utilizar emulación de logs del servidor web (httpd). Es importante activarlo con el fin de poder utilizar el sistema de análisis de estadísticas webalizer http://www.colnodo.apc.org/registro/webalizer.shtml: *emulate_httpd_log on* Saludos a la lista. Hector Martínez R. La información contenida en esta transmisión es confidencial y no puede ser usada o difundida por personas distintas a su(s) destinatario(s). El uso no autorizado de la información contenida en este correo puede ser sancionado criminalmente de conformidad con la Ley Chilena. Si ha recibido un correo por error, por favor destrúyalo y notifique al remitente. El Departamento de Informática del Ministerio de Educación le recomienda, para el buen desempeño de su correo, lo siguiente: - Revise su correo diariamente - Pida confirmación de los correos que envía - Oriéntese de las buenas practicas en el uso del correo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
RE: [CentOS-es] RV: emulate_httpd_log on
-Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Maximo Monsalvo Enviado el: Viernes, 13 de Junio de 2008 8:52 Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] RV: emulate_httpd_log on Hector Martínez Romo wrote: Estimados La opción emulate_httpd_log on no me funciona, la fecha y hora en el access.log no sale en el formato deseado, si bien uso sarg para ver los log de squid, me gustaría poder verlos también directamente en el access.log pero con un formato de hora y fecha entendible. ¿Qué puede ser? estas seguro que funciona eso como vos pensas? esto es lo que dice la ayudad emulate_httpd_log. Este parámetro define si se desea utilizar emulación de logs del servidor web (httpd). Es importante activarlo con el fin de poder utilizar el sistema de análisis de estadísticas webalizer http://www.colnodo.apc.org/registro/webalizer.shtml: Seguro, cuando especificaba esta opción, al hacer un tail -f /var/log/squid/access.log me aparecía los accesos con un formato de fecha y hora entendible. *emulate_httpd_log on* Saludos a la lista. Hector Martínez R. La información contenida en esta transmisión es confidencial y no puede ser usada o difundida por personas distintas a su(s) destinatario(s). El uso no autorizado de la información contenida en este correo puede ser sancionado criminalmente de conformidad con la Ley Chilena. Si ha recibido un correo por error, por favor destrúyalo y notifique al remitente. El Departamento de Informática del Ministerio de Educación le recomienda, para el buen desempeño de su correo, lo siguiente: - Revise su correo diariamente - Pida confirmación de los correos que envía - Oriéntese de las buenas practicas en el uso del correo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es La información contenida en esta transmisión es confidencial y no puede ser usada o difundida por personas distintas a su(s) destinatario(s). El uso no autorizado de la información contenida en este correo puede ser sancionado criminalmente de conformidad con la Ley Chilena. Si ha recibido un correo por error, por favor destrúyalo y notifique al remitente. El Departamento de Informática del Ministerio de Educación le recomienda, para el buen desempeño de su correo, lo siguiente: - Revise su correo diariamente - Pida confirmación de los correos que envía - Oriéntese de las buenas practicas en el uso del correo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] cman stop failed
Dear All, I am using CentOS4 Update 3 Cluster Suite for i386 Architecture and my linux kernel version is 2.6.9-34.EL I have configured two node cluster My nodes are primary and secondary and I am using cluster to monitoring scripts During reboot or poweroff i am getting the problem is cman stop failed and I have verified the /var/log/messages log file and i getting the following messages Jun 12 18:34:13 primary cman: Stopping cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: failed to stop cman failed Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary rc: Stopping cman: failed We are not sure why this is happening. Can some one throw light on this. Regards -S.Balaji ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Hi all, Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified? I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB certified? In case you need to know, I am compiling a list of LSB certified Linux just for comparison as to who would want to be LSB certified. Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. --- Join OSCC MAMPU Mailing Lists http://lists.oscc.org.my/mailman/listinfo/oscc-discuss ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Nicholas wrote: Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. And what, pray tell, is LSB? -- Cheers, Morten :wq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Correction: RHEL 5 is LSB 3.1. Does this mean CentOS 5 is automatically LSB 3.1? Nicholas wrote: Hi all, Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified? I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB certified? In case you need to know, I am compiling a list of LSB certified Linux just for comparison as to who would want to be LSB certified. Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. -- Nicholas A. Suppiah Training Certification Manager Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC) MAMPU Tel: 603 8319 1200 URL: http://opensource.mampu.gov.my --- Join OSCC MAMPU Mailing Lists http://lists.oscc.org.my/mailman/listinfo/oscc-discuss ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Morten Nilsen wrote: And what, pray tell, is LSB? http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB quote About the Linux Standard Base (LSB) The Linux Standard Base delivers interoperability between applications and the Linux operating system. Currently all major distributions comply with the LSB and many major application vendors, like MySQL, RealNetworks and SAP, are certifying. The LSB offers a cost-effective way for application vendors to target multiple Linux distributions while building only one software package. For end-users, the LSB and its mark of interoperability preserves choice by allowing them to select the applications and distributions they want while avoiding vendor lock-in. LSB certification of distributions results in more applications being ported to Linux and ensures that distribution vendors are compatible with those applications. In short, the LSB ensures Linux does not fragment. If you are an end user looking for Linux distributions that support open standards, please see our list of LSB certified products https://www.linux-foundation.org/lsb-cert/productdir.php?by_lsb. If you are a developer looking to build portable Linux applications that will work on these distributions, please see the Linux Developer Network http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Developers./quote ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cman stop failed
The log info that you have provided is not enough to decide on the problem that you are facing. Could you please post the entire log and the cluster.conf file along with it. Thanks GS R Balaji wrote: Dear All, I am using CentOS4 Update 3 Cluster Suite for i386 Architecture and my linux kernel version is 2.6.9-34.EL I have configured two node cluster My nodes are primary and secondary and I am using cluster to monitoring scripts During reboot or poweroff i am getting the problem is cman stop failed and I have verified the /var/log/messages log file and i getting the following messages Jun 12 18:34:13 primary cman: Stopping cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: failed to stop cman failed Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary rc: Stopping cman: failed We are not sure why this is happening. Can some one throw light on this. Regards -S.Balaji ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos begin:vcard fn:GS R n:R;Gowrishankar email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Senior Quality Analyst tel;cell:9820499133 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Morten Nilsen wrote: Nicholas wrote: Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. And what, pray tell, is LSB? Linux Standard Base (LSB)* - http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB* begin:vcard fn:GS R n:R;Gowrishankar email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Senior Quality Analyst tel;cell:9820499133 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Xen
Victor Padro wrote: Proxmox VE is the *only *virtualization platform which can do all of the following on one physical host: * Container Virtualization (OpenVZ) * Full virtualization (KVM) * Para-virtualization (KVM) We encourage everybody to test Proxmox VE and give feedback, for download and documentation please visit the *Proxmox VE Wiki /.* Feel free to get in contact with me directly - [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Sounds interesting, I just don't like the debian as underlying os for the server ;-) However, since it's licensed under the GPL, I will try to get it work with a redhat based linux. Regards, Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:06 AM, GS R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Morten Nilsen wrote: Nicholas wrote: Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. And what, pray tell, is LSB? Linux Standard Base (LSB)* - http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB* ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos https://www.linuxfoundation.org/lsb-cert/productdir.php?by_lsb ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Fwd: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability
Hi All, I have posted this messgage yesterday in the Beowulf mailing list, and did not get any responses, as i have tried different Centos kernels to see if the behaviour changes or not, and it did not change much, I am posting it here, I hope no one minds, and thanks in advance for any pointers or clues? -- Forwarded message -- From: Walid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2008/6/12 Subject: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All, I have an issue with a new cluster setup where the nodes are RHEL5.1(with the latest 5.2 kernel), when i try to write NFS data, the nodes scale linearly until they reach the 10th node, that is the bandwidth , and throughput seen from the NFS sever on the other side of the nodes shows a liner increment from around 100+Mbyte/sec up to 1Gbyte/sec, however when we add another extra node to the equation the bandwidth/throughput becomes erratic/inconsistent, and drops to around 500-700Mbyte/sec. however if i try the same setup with RHEL4U6 i do not get the same behaviour it sustains the bandwidth at 1Gbyte/sec. the setup is like this 48 nodes sharing 48 port access switch that is up linked using 10g link to a CISCO 6509 switch which is linked to a Clustered NFS File system that consist of eight heads where each head linked using a 10G link to the 6509. the above was a write test, so i thought may be the tcp congestion kicked in, or sliding windows problem, however when i do a read test it gets worse, the scalability now is reduced to 5 nodes that is one node is able to read around 100 MBps, two will read double, and so on until you add the fifth node where the bandwidth drops from around 500+MBps to around 300, and again from RHEL4 the behaviour is different. any pointers? TIA Walid ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Nicholas wrote: Correction: RHEL 5 is LSB 3.1. Does this mean CentOS 5 is automatically LSB 3.1? Yes. But we may not call it so, as CentOS is *not* certified by the Linux Foundation. But the LSB tests should run without any problem on If anyone wants to sponsor that - feel free to contact the CentOS team, as the fees are pretty high: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Fee_Schedule And the product has to be retested after each maintenance release (5.1, 5.2, 5.3) ... But you could also donate that kind of money to the CentOS project if you want to express how you feel about CentOS :) Cheers, Ralph pgptLqTLQZEp7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
Ralph Angenendt wrote: But the LSB tests should run without any problem on CentOS 5. Ralph pgp6TWV2FTtE0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Nicholas wrote: Correction: RHEL 5 is LSB 3.1. Does this mean CentOS 5 is automatically LSB 3.1? Yes. But we may not call it so, as CentOS is *not* certified by the Linux Foundation. But the LSB tests should run without any problem on If anyone wants to sponsor that - feel free to contact the CentOS team, as the fees are pretty high: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Fee_Schedule And the product has to be retested after each maintenance release (5.1, 5.2, 5.3) ... To be honest, I think that is where we are different from RHEL. If you need absolute assurance that CentOS is LSB certified on paper before corporate management, buy RHEL entitlements and drop CentOS. If you can live with CentOS and do not need the added value from Red Hat (support, EAL/LSB certification, legal indemnification for IP infringement, hardware/software certification) stick with CentOS. But if your business relies on CentOS, your business relies on Red Hat as well. There is at least a moral duty to think what that is worth to your business and act accordingly. -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RPM creation question
Clint Dilks wrote:
For those who care
- On FC6 / CentOS 4 - To Disable this you must hack the script as far as
I can tell. I am told that on New Versions of Fedora (and I assume
CentOS 5) that you can add %__jar_repack %{nil} to the top of the spec
file.
Why cant you twiddle with __os_install_post ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cman stop failed
Dear All, I have getting the following messages alone from the log file Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: Stopping lock_gulmd: Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: shutdown succeeded Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: ESC[60G Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary rc: Stopping lock_gulmd: succeeded Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary cman: Stopping cman: Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary cman: failed to stop cman failed Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary cman: Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary rc: Stopping cman: failed Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary ccsd: Stopping ccsd: Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary ccsd[2454]: Stopping ccsd, SIGTERM received. Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary ccsd: shutdown succeeded Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary ccsd: ESC[60G Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary ccsd: Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary rc: Stopping ccsd: succeeded I have attached my cluster.conf file herewith. Regards -S.Balji GS R wrote: The log info that you have provided is not enough to decide on the problem that you are facing. Could you please post the entire log and the cluster.conf file along with it. Thanks GS R Balaji wrote: Dear All, I am using CentOS4 Update 3 Cluster Suite for i386 Architecture and my linux kernel version is 2.6.9-34.EL I have configured two node cluster My nodes are primary and secondary and I am using cluster to monitoring scripts During reboot or poweroff i am getting the problem is cman stop failed and I have verified the /var/log/messages log file and i getting the following messages Jun 12 18:34:13 primary cman: Stopping cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: failed to stop cman failed Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary rc: Stopping cman: failed We are not sure why this is happening. Can some one throw light on this. Regards -S.Balaji ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ?xml version=1.0? cluster config_version=100 name=EMSCluster fence_daemon post_fail_delay=0 post_join_delay=3/ clusternodes clusternode name=corviewprimary votes=1 fence/ /clusternode clusternode name=corviewsecondary votes=1 fence/ /clusternode /clusternodes cman expected_votes=1 two_node=1/ fencedevices/ rm failoverdomains failoverdomain name=corviewserver ordered=1 restricted=0 failoverdomainnode name=corviewprimary priority=1/ failoverdomainnode name=corviewsecondary priority=1/ /failoverdomain /failoverdomains resources ip address=192.168.13.83 monitor_link=1/ script file=/etc/init.d/manager name=manager/ script file=/etc/init.d/jmd name=jmd/ script file=/etc/init.d/fm name=fm/ script file=/etc/init.d/postgresql name=postgresql/ script file=/etc/init.d/active name=activestate/ script file=/etc/init.d/drbddiskstarter name=drbddiskstarter/ script file=/etc/init.d/drbddiskstopper name=drbddiskstopper/ /resources service autostart=1 domain=corviewserver name=EMS recovery=relocate ip ref=192.168.13.83/ script ref=drbddiskstarter/ script ref=activestate/ script ref=postgresql/ script ref=manager/ script ref=fm/ script ref=jmd/ script ref=drbddiskstopper/ /service /rm /cluster ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fwd: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability
I have an issue with a new cluster setup where the nodes are RHEL5.1(with the latest 5.2 kernel), when i try to write NFS data, the nodes scale Have you tried the latest bz32 kernel from Johnny? http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/ I have kind of lost faith in RH kernels as far as NFS performance is concerned - and yes, I know that the bz32 issue is supposedly solved in 5.2 but until we can positively confirm that ourselves I ain't letting it near our production servers BR Bent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cman stop failed
Hi Balaji Again the log info that you have provided is too little atleast for me to diagnose. Would be better if you could attach the /var/log/messages from corviewprimary and corviewsecondary servers. Also, just to remind you that GULM uses only /etc/hosts so make sure you have the entries of both the servers in both the /etc/hosts file. Thanks GS R Balaji wrote: Dear All, I have getting the following messages alone from the log file Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: Stopping lock_gulmd: Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: shutdown succeeded Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: ESC[60G Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary lock_gulmd: Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary rc: Stopping lock_gulmd: succeeded Jun 10 18:53:13 corviewsecondary cman: Stopping cman: Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary cman: failed to stop cman failed Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary cman: Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary rc: Stopping cman: failed Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary ccsd: Stopping ccsd: Jun 10 18:53:17 corviewsecondary ccsd[2454]: Stopping ccsd, SIGTERM received. Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary ccsd: shutdown succeeded Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary ccsd: ESC[60G Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary ccsd: Jun 10 18:53:18 corviewsecondary rc: Stopping ccsd: succeeded I have attached my cluster.conf file herewith. Regards -S.Balji GS R wrote: The log info that you have provided is not enough to decide on the problem that you are facing. Could you please post the entire log and the cluster.conf file along with it. Thanks GS R Balaji wrote: Dear All, I am using CentOS4 Update 3 Cluster Suite for i386 Architecture and my linux kernel version is 2.6.9-34.EL I have configured two node cluster My nodes are primary and secondary and I am using cluster to monitoring scripts During reboot or poweroff i am getting the problem is cman stop failed and I have verified the /var/log/messages log file and i getting the following messages Jun 12 18:34:13 primary cman: Stopping cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: failed to stop cman failed Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary cman: Jun 12 18:34:16 primary rc: Stopping cman: failed We are not sure why this is happening. Can some one throw light on this. Regards -S.Balaji ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fwd: RHEL5 network throughput/scalability
Hi Bent, Have you tried the latest bz32 kernel from Johnny? http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/ I have kind of lost faith in RH kernels as far as NFS performance is concerned - and yes, I know that the bz32 issue is supposedly solved in 5.2 but until we can positively confirm that ourselves I ain't letting it near our production servers Yes I did, however now that you mention it, when i did first time i had two issues one of performance that i am not getting the required performance in terms of bandwidth, and by applying the standard RHEL4 kernel network parameters that did fix it, now i am left with that scalability issue regards Walid ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 40, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest... Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0502 Important CentOS 3 i386 XFree86 - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2008:0502 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 XFree86 - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2008:0522 Important CentOS 3 i386 perl - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2008:0522 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 perl - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2008:0512-01: Important CentOS 2 i386XFree86 security update (John Newbigin) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:26:31 +0200 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0502 Important CentOS 3 i386 XFree86 - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0502 XFree86 security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0502.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-cyrillic-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-devel-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-doc-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-font-utils-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-14-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-14-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-15-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-15-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-9-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-ISO8859-9-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-libs-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-libs-data-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-Mesa-libGL-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-Mesa-libGLU-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-sdk-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-syriac-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-tools-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-truetype-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-twm-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-xauth-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-xdm-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-xfs-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-Xnest-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/XFree86-Xvfb-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/XFree86-4.3.0-128.EL.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update XFree86\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080612/9e40e6ab/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:28:12 +0200 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0502 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 XFree86 - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0502 XFree86 security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0502.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-base-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-cyrillic-fonts-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-devel-4.3.0-128.EL.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-devel-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/XFree86-doc-4.3.0-128.EL.x86_64.rpm
RE: [CentOS] assigning best gateway via DHCP
What might I do Linux-wise to create a system that looked at multiple gateways and then assigned (via DHCP) the gateway that was the least congested? Anyone have any good suggestions in this department? Your assumption is that the level of congestion would remain unchanged for the length of the lease? Maybe an alternative is something that hands out one gateway then decides possibly what ip to masquerade with. jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
AW: Re: [CentOS] OT: HP Autoloader Issue
Joseph L. Casale wrote: I spent a good chunk of time trying to get an HP LTO Autoloader to work with Amanda only to later find out it was faulty. Aside from HP who has a brutal system for repairing hardware, does anyone know where I might be able to send it for repair? Joseph, Maybe the follwing link is helpful : http://www.useddlt.com (German Website) http://www.useddlt.com/international.0.html (Overview,English) Best Regards Marc Rebischke ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Key Card Access software
We have http://www.cansec.com/ based prox readers and port servers but the software is a joke. It doesn't run as a service, so the server must be logged in at the console. Anyone use anything Linux based they can vouch for? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] is CentOS an LSB certified product?
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Nicholas wrote: Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified? We have been offered a pass through the process by the LSB, but there has not been demand for it. I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB certified? One assumes you mean 'RHEL'? Distribution releases, and not companties, are certified. You need to go check the LSB site more closely -- the answer is clearly there. -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network FS w/o user setup
Ted Miller wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Ted Miller wrote: Is there a file system + configuration that will let me share a directory, and anyone who has access to something in that directory on the server will also have access (and lack of access) to the same files from the client? Clients will be Centos5, Win2K, WinXP. Server is Centos5. To put it another way, all users have accounts on the server. I don't want to have to set up ANY user information on the server, other than what I set up to control local access. I just want to say Share /vmware and have it available, to the same users who can access it locally. With Samba I have to maintain duplicate user lists, password lists, and share access lists. I have not been able to find a clear instructions on how NFS4 handles this, but what I found didn't seem any better than Samba. I don't mind implementing ACLs on the server if it will do what I need, but I can't find anything that says it will save me any work either. Well, since you want to set up shares ... and since you want to share between Windows and Linux machines, and to share for windows you will need to use samba. Since you can also set up linux to use a samba client, that would probably be the best method to share these files ... if you expect to just oepn them via a file manager on all platforms. Is there a way to set up samba so that it just uses ACL information for permissions, instead of having to spell everything out for each share and each user? Well ... you would need to Join the Samba Server to your Windows Domain. If that domain is ADS (Active Directory Services) then it is a different procedure than if it is a WinNT type Windows Domain. Once the server is a member if the domain, the shares that are setup will work for your Windows users. You would then need to setup Samba Authentication for your Linux Client machines. The best method to do that depends on your business, who you have to interface with, what services you are running on the network, etc. I run a Samba PDC (using LDAP as a backend) with Samba BDC's in several remote locations. If you do not require ADS network, then this can work great as LDAP databases can be replicated from the PDC to the BDCs and Linux machines can easily be setup to use LDAP for authentication. However, if you need an ADS domain, then the LDAP method does not work since Samba can not be a Domain Controller for ADS. That would require you to be a Domain Member Server and enable samba authentication for Linux clients. The methods to do that are too hard to explain on list. Much research needs to be done on samba.org docs (assuming you already understand the whole Windows Domain concept and how it works on Windows). The way that you will proceed is an infrastructure decision and based your individual needs and infrastructure. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] assigning best gateway via DHCP
Joseph L. Casale wrote: What might I do Linux-wise to create a system that looked at multiple gateways and then assigned (via DHCP) the gateway that was the least congested? Anyone have any good suggestions in this department? Your assumption is that the level of congestion would remain unchanged for the length of the lease? Maybe an alternative is something that hands out one gateway then decides possibly what ip to masquerade with. This is a good idea, thanks. So, I'm assuming that you mean something like this? http://tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] assigning best gateway via DHCP
This is a good idea, thanks. So, I'm assuming that you mean something
like this?
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/
Yeah,
I don't know how sexy the solution would be, but you could poll for
throughput/availability
with a script, then rewrite the iptables rule for example taking the new,
preferred outside route as
your new external IP to masq with. It would be functional, and given the
external link your moving
away from is likely down you probably don't have to worry about existing
connections, or do you? :)
Once you rewrite the rule and refresh it, current connections getting masq'ed
will be killed. If your
in the middle of secure connection to something/someone or a download, it will
be terminated.
There is *no* way of maintaining any connection between different paths in this
situation unless you
specifically have something setup with your provider that is aggregated across
{n} connections, but then
we wouldn't be discussing this:)
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] TCP offload cards in linux
Anyone have experience with any? I've been having a real hard
time finding info on any cards that actually support this under
linux. (most of the cards work but I don't see drivers that
actually offload the TCP stack)
I have seen some comments where kernel developers don't like the
idea as well.
I'm running CentOS 4.6 64-bit on a dual proc quad core system with
8GB memory.
I have a situation where I'm trying to make the most of my
hardware here, a web application that serves up hundreds of tiny
requests per second(each taking typically sub 100ms to complete).
With my load balancer in it's normal mode I can pump about 1000
requests a second through the system, before exhausting the TCP
stack on the server(all ~65k sockets in use). CPU usage tops out
at about 75%. The normal mode terminates idle connections
forcefully after 25 seconds.
If I tell my load balancer to terminate idle connections *immediately*
instead of waiting 25 seconds, I get similar CPU usage but transactions
per second drop by about 30-33%.
During my tests I've also gotten 4 kernel panics, the last two
I have captured and they are virtually identical, with the
exception of one time it panic's on the java process, another time
it panics on the swapper process. Both times the load balancer was
configured to terminate connections faster than 25 seconds. I've
done several searches and can't find anything remotely related to
the below panic.
Kernel BUG at tcp_output:943
invalid operand: [1] SMP
CPU 2
Modules linked in: dell_rbu md5 ipv6 autofs4 i2c_dev i2c_core nfs lockd
nfs_acl sunrpc dm_mirror dm_mod joydev button battery ac uhci_hcd ehci_hcd
hw_random shpchp bnx2 ext3 jbd ata_piix libata megaraid_sas sd_mod scsi_mod
Pid: 10645, comm: java Not tainted 2.6.9-67.ELsmp
RIP: 0010:[802e1a12] 802e1a12{tcp_retransmit_skb+639}
RSP: :010006963e98 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0101687cd9c0 RBX: 0102266d2a80 RCX: 0101687cd9c0
RDX: 0101dec72e80 RSI: 0350 RDI: 0010
RBP: 01015c0f7700 R08: 0008 R09: 0100
R10: R11: 0008 R12: 01007b64ccb0
R13: 05b4 R14: 01007b64ccb0 R15: 01007b64c980
FS: 48fe0960(005b) GS:804f2e80() knlGS:
CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b
CR2: 002adc82e028 CR3: 0694e000 CR4: 06e0
Process java (pid: 10645, threadinfo 010055cba000, task 01005633c7f0)
Stack: 010006963ec8 02102a93 01007b64ccb0 0001
01007b64c980 0008 01007b64ccb0 01007b64ccb0
002c273fc4d0 802e3f6d
Call Trace:IRQ 802e3f6d{tcp_write_timer+1059}
802e3b4a{tcp_write_timer+0}
80140945{run_timer_softirq+356}
8013cff0{__do_softirq+88}
8013d099{do_softirq+49}
80110bf5{apic_timer_interrupt+133}
EOI
Code: 0f 0b 48 c1 34 80 ff ff ff ff af 03 48 8b 43 10 4c 63 f6 ff
RIP 802e1a12{tcp_retransmit_skb+639} RSP 010006963e98
0Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops
From what I can tell the Broadcom chips in this server support TOE
but the driver in linux does not implement it. I'd like to find a
card that really has TOE in linux, if for nothing else to compare how
it performs vs what I have now. With the goal of pumping out the
highest number of transactions per second possible with the hardware/power
utilization.
thanks
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP offload cards in linux
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 at 10:52am, nate wrote Anyone have experience with any? I've been having a real hard time finding info on any cards that actually support this under linux. (most of the cards work but I don't see drivers that actually offload the TCP stack) I have seen some comments where kernel developers don't like the idea as well. A pretty good discussion of this just occurred over on the beowulf mailing list. See http://marc.info/?t=12107921039r=1w=2. -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network FS w/o user setup
Johnny Hughes wrote: You would then need to setup Samba Authentication for your Linux Client machines. The best method to do that depends on your business, who you have to interface with, what services you are running on the network, etc. I run a Samba PDC (using LDAP as a backend) with Samba BDC's in several remote locations. If you do not require ADS network, then this can work great as LDAP databases can be replicated from the PDC to the BDCs and Linux machines can easily be setup to use LDAP for authentication. However, if you need an ADS domain, then the LDAP method does not work since Samba can not be a Domain Controller for ADS. That would require you to be a Domain Member Server and enable samba authentication for Linux clients. I've been able to use SMB authentication against an AD just by filling in the entries in system-config-authentication. I'm not sure if that requires any compatibility settings on the AD side or not - it just worked for me so I didn't ask questions. The down side is that you do have to add the users and maintain groups on the linux side which isn't too difficult if they don't change a lot, just adduser -u uid -g gid login_name with the same values on all the boxes and copy changes to /etc/group around. The up side is that you can control which users have access separately and only have to deal with passwords for users that aren't in AD - and you don't have to ask permission to join the linux boxes to the domain. The methods to do that are too hard to explain on list. Much research needs to be done on samba.org docs (assuming you already understand the whole Windows Domain concept and how it works on Windows). The way that you will proceed is an infrastructure decision and based your individual needs and infrastructure. Winbind can automatically create users from AD, but you have to join the domain and I'm not sure what you have to do to coordinate the uid mapping across machines so NFS shares work. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
Hi all, I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? Thanks in advance, -Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:28:28PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us: I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? You'll probably want to ask the ISPConfig folks. Matt -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
- Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? You'll probably want to ask the ISPConfig folks. Matt If it were an ISPConfig question, I would...I simply was asking what the matching command line was for a corresponding action in X. Please let me know if I'm wrong, but this isn't OT, nor is it ISPConfig related. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
On Friday, June 13, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Ray Leventhal wrote: Hi all, I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? # vi /etc/dovecot.conf See: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postfix Or: http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation/Maildir When all else fails, read the instructions. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:28:28PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us: I'm following a how-to for ISPConfig using CentOS5.1 and have run into the following instruction: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? You'll probably want to ask the ISPConfig folks. indeed. That said: - dovecot supports mbox as well. - what is the benefit of a gui when one uses ssh... ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:41:48PM -0400, Ray Leventhal enlightened us: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? You'll probably want to ask the ISPConfig folks. Matt If it were an ISPConfig question, I would...I simply was asking what the matching command line was for a corresponding action in X. Please let me know if I'm wrong, but this isn't OT, nor is it ISPConfig related. Management - Server - Settings - Email is most likely an ISPConfig thing, since I don't recall ever seeing that in a CentOS menu anywhere. So without knowing what that is doing, we can't tell you what commands you might run over SSH to make the equivalent changes. Most likely it involves changing the configuration file for your MTA (Postfix, exim, sendmail) - but again, we don't know what that is, so we can't tell you. There's not going to be one magic command you can run to enable Maildir on your server. Matt -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
Ray Leventhal wrote: - Dovecot uses Maildir format (not mbox), so if you install ISPConfig on the server, please make sure you enable Maildir under Management - Server - Settings - Email. ISPConfig will then do the necessary configuration. Since I'm ssh'd in to the box and X isn't installed, what's the CLI to accomplish this? You'll probably want to ask the ISPConfig folks. Matt If it were an ISPConfig question, I would...I simply was asking what the matching command line was for a corresponding action in X. Please let me know if I'm wrong, but this isn't OT, nor is it ISPConfig related. what is the question then? is it how to configure dovecot to use maildir or how to configure the MTA (postfix, sendmail, ...) to deliver to maildir or how to configure the MDA (maildrop, procmail, ...) to deliver to maildir? if it's to configure dovecot to use maildir instead of mbox, then the dovecot list and docs are a better place. the short answer is something like mail_location = maildir:/var/Mail/domains/%d/%n/Maildir in dovecot.conf. but we cannot reproduce dovecot documentation here. but you'd better have the MTA or MDA deliver to the same place. the easy way is to use dovecot LDA as your delivery agent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP offload cards in linux
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: A pretty good discussion of this just occurred over on the beowulf mailing list. See http://marc.info/?t=12107921039r=1w=2. Thanks! It seems I should just stop looking, not cost effective for my purposes. Sigh nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] enabling maildir @ cli
Thanks for the answers, pointers and help. Haste makes not only waste, but exposes inexperience, as it has done here. (my own, of course) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
