Re: [CentOS-docs] Added new guide OCS Inventory NG to wiki
I am interested in comparing notes as I just documented my install on
Centos and was going to offer it to the wiki as well.
Regards,
DNK
On 25-Jun-08, at 1:08 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, everyone.
I added a new guide for installing and configuring the OCS Inventory
NG
server/client system on CentOS 5.x. Also, there's some brief
explanations for integrating it into GLPI.
I added it under non CentOS applications, since I think it fits in
best
there.
Regards,
Max
- --
# find . *imbecile -exec sed -ie s/stupidity/commonsense/g '{}' \;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIYqXGIXSX/6LmsXkRAjb4AKCGoREkJRDs33yTFyHV+ag0KFgemwCgiNYf
IRJzzc/f7cH/CTMzOmyZIxs=
=dGLh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Aide à la traduction
Bonjour, J'ai un problème pour traduire upstream provider qui apparaît à de multiples reprises. Je comprend bien ce que cela veut dire, mais je ne voit pas comment le traduire. Merci d'avance. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Aide à la traduction
Aymeric DERBOIS wrote: Bonjour, J'ai un problème pour traduire upstream provider qui apparaît à de multiples reprises. Je comprend bien ce que cela veut dire, mais je ne voit pas comment le traduire. For our non-french readers: He's looking for a french translation for the term upstream provider :) Cheers, Ralph pgpEtrVaj3mh2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] CentOS Styleguide
hy there, I hope as on http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Artwork mentioned I'm here at the right place for that. It also fits for the Promo SIG or others Under http://www.braincache.de/centos/CentOS_Styleguide_0.1-draft.pdf can be my first idea of an Styleguide wich could help to give a line of usage to some Grafics design issues also as for Promo Stuff. I also have made a Banner http://www.braincache.de/centos/banner001.jpg how about other ideas? Comments? What about some slogans? What about get it ... TODAY! instead of try it ... today!? Wich one sounds better for you? sincerly Henrik ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0556 (updated) Important CentOS 3 i386 freetype - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0556 freetype security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html (updated) The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/freetype-2.1.4-10.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/freetype-devel-2.1.4-10.el3.i386.rpm addons/i386/RPMS/freetype-demos-2.1.4-10.el3.i386.rpm addons/i386/RPMS/freetype-utils-2.1.4-10.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/freetype-2.1.4-10.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update freetype Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpitgMZl9RtP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0556 (updated) Important CentOS 3 x86_64 freetype - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0556 freetype security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html (updated) The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/freetype-2.1.4-10.el3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/freetype-2.1.4-10.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/freetype-devel-2.1.4-10.el3.x86_64.rpm addons/x86_64/RPMS/freetype-demos-2.1.4-10.el3.x86_64.rpm addons/x86_64/RPMS/freetype-utils-2.1.4-10.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/freetype-2.1.4-10.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update freetype Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpkDSpWICFLv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0498 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 cups Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0498 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0498.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7def85e9330093cdc4e62452a1294de7 cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
083831f9d28655c862c4dcd2374e7c28 cups-devel-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
1a2f8f72a69f4f32868ef1c4d3263508 cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
9449f5b3228632bedd1a4a3048784af4 cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
Source:
efe9caa696c2c6c993110c339e8cadb0 cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0498 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 cups Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0498 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0498.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c5b4f612e365584e479f303ca883b770 cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
8ca83fca32773116751e92f0770ba76d cups-devel-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
49a318cd261b0b329ffa261845dc1054 cups-devel-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
ffeef171294d51a5d9557eab88adc94c cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
a071525281e7b10509652c42cdbadebd cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
1caf6f182c4b7ae1572f17452024a46e cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
efe9caa696c2c6c993110c339e8cadb0 cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0499 CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0499
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0499.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
08c81d8405cef2d476c97f0f60961404 kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
be554a38c966ac21797aa83818fc1011 kernel-debug-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
2cff5ab891757be026462abe5fb4153a
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
b8f9a3b6595ad221f589b0d682712020 kernel-devel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
ed7ce2a87a12d1d07e0390f0262aefaa kernel-doc-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.noarch.rpm
3edd290f4ebf329f8bd74b4f8a26141a kernel-headers-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
d84ad24372770903096cf3620b32e80a kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
7b4eaca9386d6433728ec4da8850e726 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
a41b74d097020738770f536e04c4befc kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0526 CentOS 5 x86_64 dhcpv6 Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0526
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0526.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a07a51fbf720be8879d9ab369a42ce34 dhcpv6-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
7b5deae28f9ce9b0abf9b74f76617eca dhcpv6-client-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
fbb884e7a01a8cbe87ea3e398d19b8af libdhcp6client-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
2f4a73e5456339f95f49e554536d2256 libdhcp6client-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
5b54fb207a75a27c25646e3f964e37fa libdhcp6client-devel-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
8f185dcb0edd0c0f2eb3759e65d6aefb
libdhcp6client-devel-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
6fec2a73759cbf6a0dbfd4f038779e5c dhcpv6-1.0.10-4.el5_2.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0529 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 net-snmp Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0529 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0529.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
77a5e79229864fcd06f82d462b528689 net-snmp-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
1dd2fc53ee2175dc5e678bbd0decabce net-snmp-devel-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
01ee72d938d76b6c511cdf6a1a8814ae net-snmp-libs-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
a949181c4e4301254c72f7fbe72891c0 net-snmp-perl-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
3d6f967255f6f5b14cfb493627d37181 net-snmp-utils-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
Source:
23f5c0d9c7ff016f88efbe0840803444 net-snmp-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0529 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 net-snmp Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0529 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0529.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
018f6bc07b6ee131f9d262d3c75eb686 net-snmp-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
85680af8befe283c75aaba524729e385 net-snmp-devel-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
4e0078d3385139b15bb4e916741e7e53 net-snmp-devel-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
7efa4a5904ed65d50f56b3fbd2154739 net-snmp-libs-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
dabf9dbc7bd7b93ed84526fe94b96071 net-snmp-libs-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
194731e5f304af6faa782693fd37bd53 net-snmp-perl-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
819aa4c7df01cae85490b897fbd6f88e net-snmp-utils-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
23f5c0d9c7ff016f88efbe0840803444 net-snmp-5.3.1-24.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0522 Important CentOS 5 i386 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0522 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0522.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
32c2ca09a7faaaf1459fbf663e72d076 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
57178599712f58e94958c7250ce0cb5d perl-suidperl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
Source:
a6329dd7bd2a381c40bf5449eec0904b perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0522 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0522 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0522.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
4f171d828d680975a5d2304bbdf50e13 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm
52eaa19dc867252613c69eac5023d863 perl-suidperl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
a6329dd7bd2a381c40bf5449eec0904b perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0504 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-server Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0504 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0504.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
fa1fef968fe58c5702248ad4c2957201
xorg-x11-server-randr-source-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
67b49520787ae76224d19c03bc69458a
xorg-x11-server-sdk-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
f0ad7c9932bc0b80f04dcc3913490445
xorg-x11-server-Xdmx-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
ea225f3336a8989cd3ff22ae1639d44f
xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
8c1b2cf8af835df6b64e6d154001ef67
xorg-x11-server-Xnest-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
0c46b45b2be1201e54ddaff24def19c8
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
ada36f4e4aa2e2872ad6a0221f7fb188
xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
8e0312cd76d5155564b9727ce98af676 xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.41.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0536 CentOS 5 i386 openswan Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0536
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0536.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
b324526e7469e70e16d7c7505ce69bd5 openswan-2.6.14-1.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
ed36445dd75c2c662331a22fca406766 openswan-doc-2.6.14-1.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
Source:
a5a483eb098fa22e61fe0af79130c335 openswan-2.6.14-1.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0513 CentOS 5 x86_64 ipsec-tools Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0513
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0513.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
eb95259ada75e93012f752824d4b5bb3 ipsec-tools-0.6.5-9.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
8a982b831d652511b9e419cc5977a2b7 ipsec-tools-0.6.5-9.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0556 Important CentOS 5 i386 freetype Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
598310c1ea26d98d9a3b011496fbfd3f freetype-2.2.1-20.el5_2.i386.rpm
acac75554b32e3dc961c336045e101f0 freetype-demos-2.2.1-20.el5_2.i386.rpm
b33ae1fd812bc5d0cc556302c9e0ee33 freetype-devel-2.2.1-20.el5_2.i386.rpm
Source:
dd2abf62ba50813c31eea21a26e89ced freetype-2.2.1-20.el5_2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0556 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 freetype Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0556 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0556.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9697d1e1059ab17e646ecabfb5c87a81 freetype-2.2.1-20.el5_2.i386.rpm
c2acbb93f7c24ce718f9942644b47eba freetype-2.2.1-20.el5_2.x86_64.rpm
b2b478a34dd77aa10decd576d70b7df9 freetype-demos-2.2.1-20.el5_2.x86_64.rpm
eec085d8ab957c950141d3edacebbe35 freetype-devel-2.2.1-20.el5_2.i386.rpm
42c0187ff2e63058fdcf79c3761c1608 freetype-devel-2.2.1-20.el5_2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
dd2abf62ba50813c31eea21a26e89ced freetype-2.2.1-20.el5_2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0501 CentOS 5 x86_64 gfs2-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0501
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
b934e068a7daf76e15080d43dd3101ca kmod-gfs2-1.92-1.1.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
109ffdfbb849dda14a89a6964310c254 kmod-gfs2-xen-1.92-1.1.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
8371efebd4ca25962c39b4a1e9d0ddd1 gfs2-kmod-1.92-1.1.el5_2.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0494 CentOS 5 i386 rgmanager Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0494
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0494.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f875f774254d08a02b6bdc5f00b5fd8c rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
Source:
491da7229b53e6bb0333289a8c43c86b rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0494 CentOS 5 x86_64 rgmanager Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0494
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0494.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
5bb7058fa29cb0b5b8927e37c3a024fb rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
491da7229b53e6bb0333289a8c43c86b rgmanager-2.0.38-2.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0487 CentOS 5 i386 yum Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0487
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0487.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
d776014eb266b87299465cb38e0f6b96 yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1.noarch.rpm
Source:
797e6f0506c9635a8071c5d218fc116a yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0487 CentOS 5 x86_64 yum Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0487
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0487.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0ef11f016a2cf6545ae4abb356abc498 yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1.noarch.rpm
Source:
797e6f0506c9635a8071c5d218fc116a yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0514 Important CentOS 5 i386 evolution Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0514 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0514.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
93be409b6ad731e3836e1451485477a1 evolution-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
840acc65ad6287c3dca14202654bea8b evolution-devel-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
f1984df01ba30111c982d94a63fea189 evolution-help-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
Source:
ea555cea0a92d9bfcc4515ca5ef87f84 evolution-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0514 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 evolution Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0514 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0514.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
4af4b0d51a96b5527aa52d4b8c1b0709 evolution-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
8c10c6fe94005ed0f3d3708566791568 evolution-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
8c4a290caa396cd8a169ca075e7de075 evolution-devel-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.i386.rpm
66ee6e1fc33d01c80e58b54bbdc70265 evolution-devel-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
a61c2cc6b4405ac86bef6a5f4a5a2d4f evolution-help-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ea555cea0a92d9bfcc4515ca5ef87f84 evolution-2.12.3-8.el5_2.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0282 CentOS 5 i386 evolution-connector Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0282
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0282.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c573a7f634d2b404a686df29da1e8610 evolution-connector-2.12.3-4.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
Source:
e7aaedd8844047abee49453fb1a50fda evolution-connector-2.12.3-4.el5_2.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Efectos de escritorio
El día 25 de junio de 2008 10:41, Wilson Acha [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hola, alguno sabe como activar los efctos de escritorio, especificamente el compiz fision en centos 5.1, bueno la verdad que estoy un poco picado con todo esto, pero no por esto deseo abandonas a mi centos ;) El compiz viene por defecto en centos 5.1, comprueba si lo tienes instalado o procede a instalarlo si no lo tienes (yum install compiz) salu2 Esteban -- M.Sc. Ing. Esteban Saavedra Lopez CEO Opentelematics.Bolivia Telefono:(+591.2) 5245959 Celular: +591 72450061 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oruro - Bolivia _ Te Invito a Visitarme y conocer mis Areas de Investigacion http://jesaavedra.opentelematics.org http://esteban.profesionales.org Si quieres chatear ICQ: 16270256 _ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Efectos de escritorio
2008/6/25 Esteban Saavedra L. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: El compiz viene por defecto en centos 5.1, comprueba si lo tienes instalado o procede a instalarlo si no lo tienes (yum install compiz) Hola, cabo de instalarlo tanto en mi portatil como en mi ordenador de casa, pero en ambos casos cuando le doy a activar efectos de escritorio, me dice que no ha podido activarlos, al paracer esto es por que no tiene los drivers correspondientes, como puedo saber que diver preciso en ambos casos y como instalarlos? saludos Wilson ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] traducción de las notas para CentOS-5.2
On 6/24/08, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: On 5/28/08, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hola ... ... aqui están las notas en Español: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2/Spanish Hola Alain ya salió centos-5.2, dudo que cambien a partir de hoy cualquier cosa en los isos... Siro :-) Qué te parece la traducción de las Notas de entregas que tenemos en este momento? Le hacemos alguna modificación o la dejamos como está ? Me gustaría que la comunidad hispana revisará la traducción, la ortografía, la coherencia del texto (que no esté muy a la inglesa), y cualquier otro aspecto que consideren necesario. Saludos y muchas gracias, al. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Pregunta sobtre ICECAST
Documento sin títuloHola amigos despues de 1 mes creo por fin logré instalar icecast ya edite el archivo icecast.xml lo volvi a subir sin novedades ahora no se como hacer arrancar el icecast en mi linux centos digito http://miip:8001 que es el puerto que abri para el icecast y que tambien le cambie en el archivo xml ahora trate de ejecutar este comando que creo que es para arrancar icecast que es icecast -c/etc/icecast.xml -b y me sale Starting icecast2 Detaching from the console ERROR: You should not run icecast2 as root User the changeowner directive in the config file No se a que se deba este error y como solucionarlo ya que creo que es el unico paso que me falta gracias a todos César Saludos Cordiales César Martínez Mora Soporte Técnico, Diseño y Desarrollo Web Administrador Hosting Dominios Servicom Av. 10 de Agosto N29-140 entre Acuña y Cuero y Caicedo Edificio Vivcanco Castiillo Segundo Piso Oficina 201 Quito - Ecuador Sud América (593)(02)2554-271 2221-386 (593) 099-374-317 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.servicomecuador.com ** NOTA DE DESCARGO: Este mensaje no puede ser considerado SPAM, De acuerdo a la Ley de Comercio Electrónico del Ecuador y su Reglamento publicado en el Registro Oficial 735 del 31 de diciembre de 2002, Decreto No.3496 Artículo 22.- Si usted recibe este mensaje por error o desea ser removido de nuestra lista, por favor responda con el asunto CANCELAR y será automáticamente removido. ** 1.jpgcelular.jpgEmail-Logo.jpgpersonas_trasdeotra.jpgwww.jpg___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Pregunta sobtre ICECAST
Hola Cesar: No he trabajado con el icecast, pero mirando el mensaje de error: ahora trate de ejecutar este comando que creo que es para arrancar icecast que es icecast -c/etc/icecast.xml -b y me sale Starting icecast2 Detaching from the console ERROR: You should not run icecast2 as root User the changeowner directive in the config file Si te fijas, te esta diciendo que hay el icecast no permite que lo ejecutes como el usuario root. Logueate como otro usuario y trata lanzar el icecast. Te sugeriria crear un usuario dedicado para correr el icecast. Otra cosa, fijate en el fichero de configuracion, pues en el caso del apache, te permite especificar el usuario bajo el cual va a correr el demonio (aun cuando inicialmente lo lanza el usuario root). El mensaje de error te recomienda que veas la directiva changeowner en el fichero de configuracion (la parte que dice: use the changeowner directive in the config file). Revisa el fichero /etc/icecast.xml y revisa la documentacion del icecast que dice al respecto. ok ok, ya esta, utilizar google, utilizar google, utilizar google mira esta url http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=190 en realidad no fue el primer resultado pero los primeros resultados eran en ingles, igual este estaba en la primera pagina. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] How to install *all* packages via kickstart?
Gregory Gerard wrote: Does someone have a list I can place in the packages section which is known to work and really get everything? yum install \* Considering you could be pulling in upto 5,000 pkgs, make sure you have enough drive space, fat network pipe, and lots of time. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000 with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03, CPU1 the same). I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. The previous kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686 ] seems to work fine. I am wondering if anyone has met this on PIII CPU ? I have found 99.9% identical problem on http://www.nabble.com/net-5501-and-RHEL5.2-td18024549.html (only esp and task slightly different from what I have seen on screen after crash, all other registers, call trace, code bytes identical to my case) , but that was on a different CPU. On the other hand, I run CentOS upgraded to 5.2 on a home PC with PIII (single CPU, Abit motherboard with i440BX chipset) with no problem. Is it normal, that powernowk8_init gets called on PIII CPU? Best regards, Wojtek ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000 with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03, CPU1 the same). I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. The previous kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686 ] seems to work fine. I am wondering if anyone has met this on PIII CPU ? I have found 99.9% identical problem on http://www.nabble.com/net-5501-and-RHEL5.2-td18024549.html ...snip... You are definitalty not alone on this. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912. Maybe add a note there that you have the same issue and report your system config. It looks likes it only happens on older PII and PIII machines. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic since CentOS 5.2 upgrade
Tim Verhoeven wrote: Hello. On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Olaf Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: since upgrading to CentOS 5.2 my notebook hangs while booting [...] Could you create a bug report on bugs.centos.org ? [...] Ok, done as ID 0002912. Thank you and regards Olaf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the yum upgrade it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper
hole, I think I need advice. The original error I received was a conflict
between python-devel and python, so I erased python-devel with the plan to
install it again after, but now I'm getting more errors and I think I might
be up to my neck and I've got that cold feeling on the back of my neck :-(
I have the CentOS-Base repo enabled (base, updates, addons, extras
centosplus) and CentOS-Media --- but no others.
...snip...
Could you post the output of the command /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' ?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truly minimal install
Use a kickstart-file that has a nobase statement.. And have a look at CLIP (http://oss.tresys.com/projects/clip/wiki/WikiStart) for a truly minimal kickstart (and a lot of other security related stuff, if you're interested).. Cheers, Bart - Original Message - From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 1:17:28 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: Re: [CentOS] truly minimal install David Hláčik wrote: My question is, which way i will achieve really minimum install (with yum). So far, i have during install unchecked all packages , then customized groups and removed everything including base system. As a result my CentOS install was 800MB , which is still to much for us. Value around 300 - 400 MB is OK. do a bunch of 'yum erase' runs postinstall to remove whatever you dont need ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: PHP 5.2 for CentOS 5.x
Agree with everything you're saying about bleeding edge distros. Having written quite a bit of PHP, however, I think its fair to say that most developers are fully aware that software is always evolving and probably believe that you may as well write for the latest version because before long it'll be mainstream anyway. Occasionally there are real generational differences between versions. I find the constant upgrade treadmill with things like CMSs (Drupal etc) a real pain as well. Donald Buchan wrote: I changed to linux a couple of years ago for a bunch of reasons. WGA was one of them. Being noob at the time -- still think I am today -- I had someone do it for me. They were going to put CentOS 4.4 in, but at the last minute, they put in Fedora 5. Apparently, the -devel fork. What a disaster. I was glad when my laptop got CentOS 4.4. It was stable. It worked. Things didn't break. No dependency hell. Shortly after, Fedora was nuked and both desktop and laptop were on 4.4. Today both machines have gone through the upgrade cycles are at 4.7, quite happily. My new desktop (the old one is now the home router, DVD burder, Azureus download box, and has my 80gig mass storage drive; it has 5.2 as of this morning. What do I think of non-EL distros? I'm glad I'm not having to curse for weeks every six months when I have to upgrade, that's what I think of them. And I'm a desktop user. No servers per se. Now I have to see if the new printer I got at Christmas will work without major surgery, like it needed for the 4.6 desktop. :) (I figure HP gave the summer student who knows linux a pet project to make the open source driver, and (s)he probably was using the latest drivers and libraries while downing Jolt Cola. :) ) On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:40 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: Tony Mountifield wrote: I always get frustrated with apps requiring the latest and greatest versions of PHP, etc., before they are made available for the major distributions. Is it that the very newest feature is really indispensable and the app can't possibly make do without it, or just because the developer has the bleeding-edge version on his own box and doesn't make the effort to test his app with more mainstream versions? totally. its the new/shiny syndrome. more than once, I've found 1-2 simple 1-line fixes enabled a newer version of a given PHP app to run on an older version of PHP. sadly, much of the OSS community seem to think that stable enterprise distributions like RHEL and SuSE are evil incarnate, second only to Microsoft (which they inevitably spell with a $). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:13:11 -0400 J == John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marko J A. Jennings Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:18 PM To: J centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with J nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2 J On Tue, June 24, 2008 3:08 pm, Bernhard Gschaider wrote: Hi! I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I thought I might mention it here. problem snipped J --- Have you tried J an older version of the driver from rpmforge? Do that First and J see how that turns out. I myself am a fan of the Nvidia Drivers J from nvidia.com. Meantime CentOS 5.2 is Very New and they may J very well be issues with driver Stability yet to be. J http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics This is a J link of how to install the nvidia driver from J nvidia.com. **WARNING** It is not finished but there should be J enough info there to get to rolling in the right direction. You J need to be aware it is a draft only. Cent OS 5.2 will also be J included in it with in the next 30 days as time alows me. J Alternativly after you get one Nvidia.com driver going on one J machine, you could copy the built kernel module over to other J machines providing they have the same card. Warning, I do not J condone such as that. Good Luck... Hi John! As I understand it the nvidia-x11-drv IS the nvidia.com-driver just repackaged in such a way that it automatically recompiles itself if a new kernel is installed. For the vanilla-nvidia-drivers I had to write a script for that and the number of workstation here is not big enough that it justifies that (I did that, but it never worked 100% and testing a boot time script is a pain in the a##) Obviously the script in the RPM-package doesn't know how to behave during an upgrade (let's see how it fares when the first 5.2-kernel-update comes along) Bernhard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to downgrade from CentOS 5.2 to CentOS 5.1?
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server. My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1? There is no way to downgrade, however you can install from a centos-5.1 tree, but centos-5.1 is 5.2 minus a bunch of security upgrades. We will eventually be moving the 5.1 tree to vault.centos.org, but if you want to use it for an extended period of time, you should probably download the tree to a local mirror. ___ Ok, I understand that, I'm just trying to avoid downloading reinstalling the software on there already. You can do: rpm -qa --last lastest_rpms then edit the file latest_rpms and see what was installed on the upgrade. You can then downgrade by hand the packages that are causing your problems or all of them using: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage --replacefiles path_to_old_package signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] udevd can't reach LDAP-server during boot
Thanks for the answers On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0400 MS == Meenoo Shivdasani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MS On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Johnny Hughes MS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a BUG with nss_ldap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448014 We have this bug listed in our release notes: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2#head-447967c60eb305ef2c5dbbc3f4e8b3c4c5170632 I read that, but I didn't connect it to my bug, because I didn't think that anything to do with bash is relevant at that time during the boot process. But obviously I was wrong (and by the way: that problem also occurs with 5.1, so I don't think that it is a bash 3.2 problem) You can try the nss_ldap from our testing repo for this bug: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/ This may help with the problem. MS FWIW, my experience with a variant of this problem and MS nss_ldap from the testing repo was that boot would hang MS indefinitely at udevd unless I limited the nss_reconnect_* MS values. I ended up changing to bind_policy soft as a MS workaround. So the bottom line is - it is possible to shave 2 min off the boot process - a good chance to make the machine unbootable (and then play around until it works) Well, I'm a lazy coward ;) but thanks Bernhard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2
Tim Verhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was upgrading a CentOS 5.1 box to 5.2 remotely, and I lost my ssh
connection to the server. Now when I rerun the yum upgrade it fails due
to conflicts in the transaction check stage. Before I dig myself a deeper
hole, I think I need advice. The original error I received was a conflict
between python-devel and python, so I erased python-devel with the plan to
install it again after, but now I'm getting more errors and I think I might
be up to my neck and I've got that cold feeling on the back of my neck :-(
I have the CentOS-Base repo enabled (base, updates, addons, extras
centosplus) and CentOS-Media --- but no others.
...snip...
Could you post the output of the command /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' ?
I would add a | sort to that like this:
/bin/rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort
What this normally means is that you killed your yum in the middle of an
update, where it installed packages, but did not get to the clean up
stage ... this will lead to duplicated packages installed (in the rpm
database).
The above command will show if that is a problem, and we can use a
script to change the database to have the older values by deleting the
newer ones from the database and do the upgrade again.
When doing large updates, you should use GNU screen, which will not
kill processes if you loose your connection and you can just reconnect
to the in process session.
you can get GNU screen (if it is not already installed) with the command:
yum install screen
here are some article on how to use screen:
http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_screen
http://www.rackaid.com/resources/linux-tutorials/general-tutorials/linux-screen.cfm
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] /usr/bin/id behavior since CentOS 5.2 upgrade
Hi list, Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account I have these 2 errors messages: -bash: [: =: unary operator expected -bash: [: -le: unary operator expected After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d: /etc/profile.d/krb5-workstation.sh /etc/profile.d/vim.sh The problem is with the test where the command id is involved, like: if [ `/usr/bin/id -u` = 0 ] ; If I add double quotes (`/usr/bin/id -u`), it will work again. Indeed, as a connected ldap user, the id command returns nothing when quoted: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/bin/id -u 12345 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ `/usr/bin/id -u` [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ As a normal user, the command behaves normally: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ `/usr/bin/id -u` -bash: 1302: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/bin/id -u 1302 I have modified theses two scripts but I am afraid it will break something in the future. Any idea on how to resolve this cleanly ? Best regards, kfx PS: Linux server 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5xen #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:21:20 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] /usr/bin/id behavior since CentOS 5.2 upgrade
kfx wrote: Hi list, Since the upgrade to 5.2, when I log into my server with a ldap account I have these 2 errors messages: -bash: [: =: unary operator expected -bash: [: -le: unary operator expected After investigation, the trouble come from two scripts in /etc/profile.d: /etc/profile.d/krb5-workstation.sh /etc/profile.d/vim.sh The problem is with the test where the command id is involved, like: if [ `/usr/bin/id -u` = 0 ] ; If I add double quotes (`/usr/bin/id -u`), it will work again. Indeed, as a connected ldap user, the id command returns nothing when quoted: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/bin/id -u 12345 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ `/usr/bin/id -u` [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ As a normal user, the command behaves normally: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ `/usr/bin/id -u` -bash: 1302: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/bin/id -u 1302 I have modified theses two scripts but I am afraid it will break something in the future. Any idea on how to resolve this cleanly ? This is a known upstream bug, please see the release notes: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2#head-447967c60eb305ef2c5dbbc3f4e8b3c4c5170632 As stated there, we have an nss_ldap package in the testing repo that can fix this issue, but it will not be fixed in the official repo until upsream releases a fix. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000 with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03, CPU1 the same). I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. ...snip... You are definitalty not alone on this. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912. Maybe add a note there that you have the same issue and report your system config. It looks likes I have added a note about the problem on ProLiant3000 machine and dmesg output from working kernel. it only happens on older PII and PIII machines. And then only some of them - home home PC with PIII runs fine with the new kernel. I will upgrade 2 more machines with PII or PIII and see what will happen. Thank you, Wojtek Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. I don't have the necessary knowledge to evaluate kernel related issues, but it seems to me that there's some kind of confusion involved here. People are reporting problems with Intel Pentium II and III machines yet PowerNow is a speed throttling /wiki/CPU_throttling and power saving technology used in AMD processors. Should powernowk8 be called when Intel processors are present? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerNow! No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1517 - Release Date: 24-06-2008 20:41 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Could you post the output of the command /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' ?
I would add a | sort to that like this:
/bin/rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# /bin/rpm -qa --qf
'%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort
a2ps-4.13b-57.1.el5.i386.rpm
a52dec-0.7.4-8.el5.rf.i386.rpm
aalib-1.4.0-5.el5.rf.i386.rpm
acl-2.2.39-2.1.el5.i386.rpm
acpid-1.0.4-5.i386.rpm
adminutil-1.1.5-1.fc6.i386.rpm
adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
agg-2.5-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
aide-0.13.1-2.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6.noarch.rpm
alchemist-1.0.36-2.el5.i386.rpm
alsa-lib-1.0.14-1.rc4.el5.i386.rpm
alsa-utils-1.0.14-2.rc4.el5.i386.rpm
amtu-1.0.4-4.i386.rpm
anacron-2.3-45.el5.centos.i386.rpm
ant-1.6.5-2jpp.2.i386.rpm
antlr-2.7.6-4jpp.2.i386.rpm
apmd-3.2.2-5.i386.rpm
apr-1.2.7-11.i386.rpm
apr-util-1.2.7-6.i386.rpm
arts-1.5.4-1.i386.rpm
aspell-0.60.3-7.1.i386.rpm
aspell-en-6.0-2.1.i386.rpm
at-3.1.8-82.fc6.i386.rpm
atk-1.12.2-1.fc6.i386.rpm
at-spi-1.7.11-2.fc6.i386.rpm
attr-2.4.32-1.1.i386.rpm
audiofile-0.2.6-5.i386.rpm
audit-1.5.5-7.el5.i386.rpm
audit-libs-1.5.5-7.el5.i386.rpm
audit-libs-1.6.5-9.el5.i386.rpm
audit-libs-python-1.5.5-7.el5.i386.rpm
authconfig-5.3.12-2.el5.i386.rpm
authconfig-gtk-5.3.12-2.el5.i386.rpm
autoconf-2.59-12.noarch.rpm
autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.3.i386.rpm
automake14-1.4p6-13.noarch.rpm
automake15-1.5-16.noarch.rpm
automake16-1.6.3-8.noarch.rpm
automake17-1.7.9-7.noarch.rpm
automake-1.9.6-2.1.noarch.rpm
avahi-0.6.16-1.el5.i386.rpm
avahi-glib-0.6.16-1.el5.i386.rpm
avahi-qt3-0.6.16-1.el5.i386.rpm
avg75flr-r51-a1243.i386.rpm
axis-1.2.1-2jpp.6.i386.rpm
basesystem-8.0-5.1.1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
bash-3.1-16.1.i386.rpm
bash-3.2-21.el5.i386.rpm
bc-1.06-21.i386.rpm
bcel-5.1-8jpp.1.i386.rpm
beecrypt-4.1.2-10.1.1.i386.rpm
bind-9.3.3-10.el5.i386.rpm
bind-chroot-9.3.3-10.el5.i386.rpm
bind-libs-9.3.3-10.el5.i386.rpm
bind-libs-9.3.4-6.P1.el5.i386.rpm
bind-utils-9.3.3-10.el5.i386.rpm
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5.i386.rpm
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-6.el5.i386.rpm
bison-2.3-2.1.i386.rpm
bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.1.1.noarch.rpm
bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-7.noarch.rpm
bluez-gnome-0.5-5.fc6.i386.rpm
bluez-hcidump-1.32-1.i386.rpm
bluez-libs-3.7-1.i386.rpm
bluez-utils-3.7-2.el5.centos.i386.rpm
boost-1.33.1-10.el5.i386.rpm
boost-devel-1.33.1-10.el5.i386.rpm
bridge-utils-1.1-2.i386.rpm
brlapi-0.4.1-1.fc6.1.i386.rpm
bsf-2.3.0-11jpp.1.i386.rpm
bsh-1.3.0-9jpp.1.i386.rpm
bsh-demo-1.3.0-9jpp.1.i386.rpm
bsh-javadoc-1.3.0-9jpp.1.i386.rpm
bsh-manual-1.3.0-9jpp.1.i386.rpm
busybox-1.2.0-3.el5.centos.i386.rpm
byacc-1.9-29.2.2.i386.rpm
bzip2-1.0.3-3.i386.rpm
bzip2-devel-1.0.3-3.i386.rpm
bzip2-libs-1.0.3-3.i386.rpm
caching-nameserver-9.3.3-10.el5.i386.rpm
cadaver-0.22.5-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
cairo-1.2.4-3.el5_1.i386.rpm
cairo-1.2.4-5.el5.i386.rpm
ccid-1.0.1-6.el5.i386.rpm
cdda2wav-2.01-10.i386.rpm
cdparanoia-alpha9.8-27.2.i386.rpm
cdparanoia-libs-alpha9.8-27.2.i386.rpm
cdrdao-1.2.1-2.i386.rpm
cdrecord-2.01-10.i386.rpm
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm
centos-release-notes-5.1.0-2.i386.rpm
checkpolicy-1.33.1-2.el5.i386.rpm
chkconfig-1.3.30.1-1.i386.rpm
chkconfig-1.3.30.1-2.i386.rpm
chkfontpath-1.10.1-1.1.i386.rpm
classpathx-jaf-1.0-9jpp.1.i386.rpm
classpathx-mail-1.1.1-4jpp.2.i386.rpm
compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4.i386.rpm
compat-gcc-34-c++-3.4.6-4.i386.rpm
compat-gcc-34-g77-3.4.6-4.i386.rpm
compat-glibc-2.3.4-2.26.i386.rpm
compat-glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.26.i386.rpm
compat-libf2c-34-3.4.6-4.i386.rpm
compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-138.i386.rpm
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61.i386.rpm
comps-extras-11.1-1.1.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
conman-0.1.9.2-8.el5.i386.rpm
control-center-2.16.0-14.el5.i386.rpm
coolkey-1.1.0-5.el5.i386.rpm
coolkey-devel-1.1.0-5.el5.i386.rpm
coreutils-5.97-12.1.el5.i386.rpm
coreutils-5.97-14.el5.i386.rpm
cpio-2.6-20.i386.rpm
cpp-4.1.2-14.el5.i386.rpm
cpuspeed-1.2.1-1.48.el5.i386.rpm
cracklib-2.8.9-3.3.i386.rpm
cracklib-dicts-2.8.9-3.3.i386.rpm
crash-4.0-4.6.1.i386.rpm
crontabs-1.10-8.noarch.rpm
crypto-utils-2.3-1.i386.rpm
cryptsetup-luks-1.0.3-2.2.el5.i386.rpm
cscope-15.5-15.fc6.1.i386.rpm
ctags-5.6-1.1.i386.rpm
cups-1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
cups-libs-1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm
curl-7.15.5-2.el5.i386.rpm
curl-devel-7.15.5-2.el5.i386.rpm
cvs-1.11.22-5.el5.i386.rpm
cyrus-sasl-2.1.22-4.i386.rpm
cyrus-sasl-devel-2.1.22-4.i386.rpm
cyrus-sasl-gssapi-2.1.22-4.i386.rpm
cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.22-4.i386.rpm
cyrus-sasl-md5-2.1.22-4.i386.rpm
cyrus-sasl-plain-2.1.22-4.i386.rpm
db4-4.3.29-9.fc6.i386.rpm
db4-devel-4.3.29-9.fc6.i386.rpm
dbus-1.0.0-6.3.el5_1.i386.rpm
dbus-1.0.0-7.el5.i386.rpm
dbus-devel-1.0.0-6.3.el5_1.i386.rpm
dbus-glib-0.70-5.i386.rpm
dbus-python-0.70-7.el5.i386.rpm
dbus-x11-1.0.0-6.3.el5_1.i386.rpm
dcraw-0.0.20060521-1.1.i386.rpm
dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.10-1.noarch.rpm
Deployment_Guide-en-US-5.1.0-11.el5.centos.1.noarch.rpm
desktop-backgrounds-basic-2.0-40.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
[CentOS] 5.2 blues
Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... -- Best Wishes Sorin - http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/ Proud member of TEAM OS/2. Mountainbiker [Kona Kilauea - Member of Equipe Les Cafards VTT] Motorcyclist [Honda VFR750F-'97] MCSE, MCP+I, MCP, A+ [Knowledge is power!] - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ MotD: CentOS: What Sysadmins run at home. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... Zero problems here after upgrading a bunch of servers. I guess the majority of users without problems is just not as loud. :-) Thank you CentOS team for the good work! regards, Andreas Micklei -- !!! ACHTUNG: BITTE NEUE ANSCHRIFT BEACHTEN !!! ___ Andreas Micklei IVISTAR Kommunikationssysteme AG Sachsendamm 6 / 10829 Berlin, Germany http://www.ivistar.de Handelsregister: Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 75173 Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE207795030 Vorstand: Dipl.-Inform. Heiko Schueler Aufsichtsratsvorsitz: Dr.-Ing. Dirk Elias ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Ha, until now it looks ok, but i only upgraded yesterday evening... On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:29:41 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorin.srbu Hi all, sorin.srbu sorin.srbu Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the sorin.srbu feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... sorin.srbu -- sorin.srbu Best Wishes sorin.srbu Sorin sorin.srbu - sorin.srbu http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/ sorin.srbu Proud member of TEAM OS/2. sorin.srbu Mountainbiker [Kona Kilauea - Member of Equipe Les Cafards VTT] sorin.srbu Motorcyclist [Honda VFR750F-'97] sorin.srbu MCSE, MCP+I, MCP, A+ [Knowledge is power!] sorin.srbu - sorin.srbu () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail sorin.srbu /\ sorin.srbu sorin.srbu MotD: sorin.srbu CentOS: What Sysadmins run at home. sorin.srbu sorin.srbu sorin.srbu sorin.srbu -- Test [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2
Ian Blackwell wrote: cups-libs-1.2.4-11.14.el5_1.6.i386.rpm cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.1.i386.rpm you have a few pkgs like this where more than 1 version is installed in the rpmdb, no idea what the real state on the machine drive is. Remove the NEWER version of these packages then redo the update, and run it inside a screen session - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it just worked, wont get reported, but if things break people could use a helpinghand, or just something to sync with other people who have similar problems. Going by your take of things, looking at the bugs.centos.org site - one might conclude that OhMyGod,NothingWorks,PanicPanicPanic, is there anything on this ship that is good!! Which would, even if I may say so myself, be quite wrong! I think everything is good :D Just a few people run into issues, so they report them ( and they should, its what makes us a community! ) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS roadmap/EPEL
There are lots of exciting things happening in the CentOS ecosystem at the moment, by which I mean upstream or across stream in Fedora and RHEL. I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and RedHat's Emerging Technologies projects such as Cobbler, FreeIPA and Ovirt. Also JBoss middleware. Will these sort of packages end up in CentOS eventually, or are there any major problems installing EPEL packages on CentOS? I know CentOS is very popular in the web hosting world, but enterprise grade directory servers, provisioning servers and virtualisation technologies could also see greater take up of CentOS in areas like local government and education for example (medium sized but slightly cash-challenged organisations). I suppose this is some kind of roadmap question, or a question about using EPEL packages on CentOS. Personally, I'm interested in using these emerging technologies in the local government environment. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Miguel Medalha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. I don't have the necessary knowledge to evaluate kernel related issues, but it seems to me that there's some kind of confusion involved here. People are reporting problems with Intel Pentium II and III machines yet PowerNow is a speed throttling /wiki/CPU_throttling and power saving technology used in AMD processors. Should powernowk8 be called when Intel processors are present? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerNow! In theory you are correct. The problems seems to be that upstream has decided to make that module part of the kernel itself and not as a seperate module. This means that it is always loaded and that is probably the reason why ther are issues on none-AMD hardware. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS roadmap/EPEL
There are lots of exciting things happening in the CentOS ecosystem at the moment, by which I mean upstream or across stream in Fedora and RHEL. I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and RedHat's Emerging Technologies projects such as Cobbler, FreeIPA and Ovirt. Also JBoss middleware. Will these sort of packages end up in CentOS eventually, or are there any major problems installing EPEL packages on CentOS? I know CentOS is very popular in the web hosting world, but enterprise grade directory servers, provisioning servers and virtualisation technologies could also see greater take up of CentOS in areas like local government and education for example (medium sized but slightly cash-challenged organisations). I suppose this is some kind of roadmap question, or a question about using EPEL packages on CentOS. Personally, I'm interested in using these emerging technologies in the local government environment. personally i already use epel in CentOS and have had no issues - specifically i use this for cobbler/koan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bittorrent
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 00:16 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
AND HURRY UP! My new fat pipe (potential 1.25MB/sec) has finally edged
up to 85.5KB/sec. I need the help folks! ;-)
Is that for uplink or downlink ? if you are downloading at 85k/sec there
is something wrong with your setup, I can saturage a 100mbps link with
the torrent with no problem ( there is atleast 600mbps on offer for
the i386 DVD at the moment ).
Downlink. I didn't think anything was wrong with my setup. On
non-torrent downloads I get a very good rate.
I suspected it was because I was late to the show and had just fired
it up. Somehow, the *real* announcement got by me in the clutter from
the false announcements from the unwashed masses. After I saw enough
posts making it look like an announcement had been made, I fired it up.
As it takes a little while for the torrent to discover enough peers, I
figured that was the reason.
Hmmm... But you might have something there. Maybe the fact that I
started one via the command line and the other through the UI? It
prompted me to go looking. The 1to6 zipped right along and is done. I
noticed that it had peer connections 8 of 8 from very early in its
lifetime while the DVD had 0 of 8 and has never gone above that.
I think I'll kill DVD and restart it. No help. Stop 1to6 upload restart
the whole shebang. Crap. Peers around 50. Inching up slowly, 71, 81, 88,
96... going back down... Now up to 133KB, 145, ... got as high as 545KB.
Oh well. Must be something about the DVD version. I do see that the 1to6
had peers active. DVD ha{s,d} inactive.
After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help.
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Changing the symbolic link for /Centos/5
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 03:48 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: I do not know the command line for symbolic links. I created the symbolic link of /Centos/5 to /Centos/5.1 in Nautilus which does not have a method of changing a symbolic link. Only deleting it and creating a new one. Not that I know of, I always just delete an recreate it using rm -f and ln -s at the command line. It used to be that the -f worked. Sometime in the past that disappeared. Bad decision, IMHO. snip -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS roadmap/EPEL
admin wrote: I'm thinking of projects that equip RH-like EL in general for serious entry into the enterprise, things like the Fedora Directory Server, and RedHat's Emerging Technologies projects such as Cobbler, FreeIPA and Ovirt. Also JBoss middleware. A lot ( if not all ) of these are going to be in CentOS soon, in a lot of cases we hope they are better integrated into the CentOS ecosystem being in the CentOS Repo's - eg the CentOS DirServer has been in the testing repo for a bit, and the same with cobbler/koan/func/smolt/maatkit etc. What we are ( inside the CentOS Team ) hoping to achieve is a good mix of people contributing to both the Enterprise Users ( and they are such users themselves ) and to specific industry segments where CentOS has been popular ( eg. the Virt SIG ). And since its CentOS, we focus on the Enterprise Stream of products as much as possible, and even go directly upstream in cases where we need to ( eg. Mysql in CentOS4/5 is the Enterprise Release from mysql, not the community release that Fedora and RHEL build with ). That then opens more doors for support options for people who use these builds and we hope improves and creates options for people who self-support. And we do consider the self-support users to be the core of what is CentOS today and the community around it- like this mailing list, the forums, the irc regulars etc. If you truly look at the entire setup ( eg. the php5.2 conversation recently, the fact that CentOS DirServer is around, that an IcedTea varient has been in CentOS already - the availability of DRBD for years out of the stock repo's ), its quite a well formed out ecosystem ( in your words), and one that we would like to promote and build further. When I say 'we', I hope to include all the users and abusers of CentOS :D - Maybe some of them will agree! - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:09 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: On 6/23/08, Timothy Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Orlando, FL. The move from Firefox 1.5 to 3.0 should be a big improvement for those of us who are Desktop users. Be aware that the FF beta version RH released will not successfully run certain java apps successfully. The later release candidates do run them OK. This is with the java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp.112 and jre-1.6.0_05-fcs installed. The compat package upgrade failed, but that is a topic for after I've investigated the cause. snip -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Andreas Micklei scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM: Thank you CentOS team for the good work! I second that! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bittorrent
William L. Maltby wrote: After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help. might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perhaps does not. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Karanbir Singh wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it just worked, wont get reported, but if things break people could use a helpinghand, or just something to sync with other people who have similar problems. Going by your take of things, looking at the bugs.centos.org site - one might conclude that OhMyGod,NothingWorks,PanicPanicPanic, is there anything on this ship that is good!! Which would, even if I may say so myself, be quite wrong! I think everything is good :D Just a few people run into issues, so they report them ( and they should, its what makes us a community! ) As KB says, we estimate more than 2 million CentOS installs out there, so the number of major issues are fairly small compared to that. We have identified several upstream issues that we have put in the Release Notes (see the known issues section) and for most we have testing packages to fix them. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Karanbir Singh scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:51 PM: Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... well, how it works is that the millions of machines out there where it just worked, wont get reported, but if things break people could use a helpinghand, or just something to sync with other people who have similar problems. Going by your take of things, looking at the bugs.centos.org site - one might conclude that OhMyGod,NothingWorks,PanicPanicPanic, is there anything on this ship that is good!! Which would, even if I may say so myself, be quite wrong! I think everything is good :D Just a few people run into issues, so they report them ( and they should, its what makes us a community! ) You're are right I guess. 8-) Like the other guy said, the ones with problems are just louder than the rest of us. ;-) Actually I did panic a bit when yum finished looking for updates and reported it needed some 300-400MB. I was afarid I'd hit the max on /. Turns out it worked flawlessly. My mother OTOH, has a 256kbps line down and 300-400M will take a while to download... She doesn't have any space-constraints though on / as I had. Win some, lose some... All in all, CentOS 5.2 seems to work fine. My web server and sshd is still up and chugging along. I'm happy. 8-) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on dual-PIII Compaq ProLiant 3000
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:59:36AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:08AM +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Wojtek Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000 with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03, CPU1 the same). I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. ...snip... You are definitalty not alone on this. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912. Maybe add a note there that you have the same issue and report your system config. It looks likes I have added a note about the problem on ProLiant3000 machine and dmesg output from working kernel. it only happens on older PII and PIII machines. And then only some of them - home home PC with PIII runs fine with the new kernel. I will upgrade 2 more machines with PII or PIII and see what will happen. Thank you, Added to the bug also, my guests kernel panics in Qemu (P/PII/PIII). -- Fridh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bittorrent
On 6/25/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help. might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perhaps does not. - KB I presume that as you have 1.25MB/s then you aren't on a T1 but are on dsl. Maybe your ISP is shaping your traffic for you you could run tcpdump for a short while and look for resets or window size fluctuating suggesting artificial congestion i know that using torrents has become problematic since my isp was bought by one of the bigger players in the UK who seem to think that all torrent traffic is there to be throttled irrespective of whether it is legitimate bad business model massively overselling bandwidth mike ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bittorrent
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: After reviewing the man pages again (the upmteenth time), no help. might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perhaps does not. Nope. It's got a default of no throttle. I forget the default rates, if any, but I always adjust both up/down to the max I can stand (without choking other apps/nodes in my local net). E.g. I had down at 2000KB. After I restarted, running only the DVD, it did better. However, now that I am seed, I won't be able to see much else on the download side. Peers is still inactive when it should be 8/8 (which rtorrent also allows to be increased). I think there may be something about the DVD torrent. After my post last evening, I went to eat dinner, sleep, etc., leaving things running. Speed must have picked up as the 1to6 was done and seeding this A.M. But the DVD was still crawling. As mentioned, it did pick up when I restarted and is now seeding. But info shows peers inactive. I'm almost sure this has something to do with it. With peer_exchange enabled and dht enabled, I ought to be seeing something different. - KB snip Thanks for trying to help out! I'll continue to seed for a couple weeks. -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Only problem I had was my dovecot imap server going down, but that was my fault for not reading through the new .conf file properly.. other than that its been very smooth big thanks to everyone involved, great work! cheers Dunc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bittorrent
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:54 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: On 6/25/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: snip might the default upload/download rate limits be bringing you down ? iirc, almost all BT clients have some limit or the other... rtorrent perhaps does not. - KB I presume that as you have 1.25MB/s then you aren't on a T1 but are on dsl. Nope. Cable (RoadRunner Turbo at home - competitive pressures forced a recent speed increase by Time-Warner). Maybe your ISP is shaping your traffic for you you could run tcpdump for a short while and look for resets or window size fluctuating suggesting artificial congestion I always keep a watch for such things. But I know this is not the case as I upgraded 5.1-5.2 on one node while I was downloading the images on another so that I could later seed for others. During that time, the aggregate between the two nodes was as expected. Besides, TWC knows not to mess with me! ;-) I recently reported a problem in their network that they couldn't fix for three months (typical CPE fault viewpoint I presume). I told them their net was broken and which nodes. Sure enough, we finally got to a total outage and when it was fixed, so was my problem. Anyway, one of their causes was that I had upload 27GB that week (actually, I'd been doing it for several months - they hadn't noticed so it likely was not the cause). I reminded them that the upload speed was sold to me and was mine to use, with due consideration. And being in the boonies, my contention is low. In their follow up survey about customer satisfaction, I did lay a few choice words on them and offered that not all their users were TDUs (Typical Dumb Users). i know that using torrents has become problematic since my isp was bought by one of the bigger players in the UK who seem to think that all torrent traffic is there to be throttled irrespective of whether it is legitimate I hear that Comcast over here tried that too. I can't recall if it got canned or not. There are more rumblings about others doing that too. I have no problem (as I told TWC) if it is done *as_necessary* to provide equitable access to all. I told them that software was sophisticated enough to do it as needed only. bad business model massively overselling bandwidth That's expected. Like politicians, we can't expect a profit driven business to tell us the truth, live within their means or keep their word. Plus, marketing at TWC is careless, or ignorant, about distinguishing between Kb and KB. mike snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Dunc wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Only problem I had was my dovecot imap server going down, but that was my fault for not reading through the new .conf file properly.. other than that its been very smooth big thanks to everyone involved, great work! If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to the release notes and/or wiki. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2 {solved - I hope}
Thanks to all that offered advice to help solve this for me. Here's a
round up for those that may follow in similarly ill-fated foot-steps.
1. Don't update/upgrade remotely without using screen. Dropping the
ssh session caused yum to die inelegantly, with duplicate packages in
the RPM database.
2. Analysing the output from
/bin/rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort
led me to erase almost 30 new packages that appeared to be duplicates of
existing packages. This wasn't without problems though, because I used
this command:-
yum erase libgcc-4.1.2-42.el5.i386
to remove the duplication noticed here:-
libgcc-4.1.2-14.el5.i386.rpm
libgcc-4.1.2-42.el5.i386.rpm
3. This broke the machine badly, and caused yum to stop working
completely with missing libgcc_s.so.1 being reported as the cause. This
also effected other programs, e.g. man wasn't working either. Anyway,
long story short, I booted from the 5.1 DVD in rescue mode. I was
reluctant to reboot the box in a half upgraded state, but was forced
into this due to the corrupt libgcc problem. I then forced the
reinstallation of libgcc-4.1.2-14.el5.i386 from the DVD using:-
rpm -ivh --force --root /mnt/sysimage libgcc-4.1.2-14.el5.i386.rpm
This worked OK and the machine rebooted without a problem (what a relief).
4. Next I tried the yum -y upgrade process again (from the console this
time), and to my enormous delight, it downloaded the packages I had
removed earlier and then passed all transaction tests and started to
process the 577 steps left to upgrade to 5.2.
5. I think there may still be some duplicates, which I'll check for
after the upgrade has completed. I didn't get all the way through my
analysis of the duplicate package list because of the broken libgcc
issue. Having resolved this with the rescue boot, I took a punt on
having done enough and restarted yum upgrade. Since it worked, I
decided against interrupting it with the view to a subsequent
reconciliation.
All being well, I should have an upgraded machine fairly soon.
Thanks again for your prompt and enlightened assistance 8-)
Ian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] where is CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO???
I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than 30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but it is fake. My company does NOT allow use torrent to download files. Any ideal? __ 付費才容量無上限？Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱2.0免費給你，信件永遠不必刪！ http://tw.mg0.mail.yahoo.com/dc/landing___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2 {solved - I hope}
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Ian Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all that offered advice to help solve this for me. Here's a round
up for those that may follow in similarly ill-fated foot-steps.
1. Don't update/upgrade remotely without using screen. Dropping the ssh
session caused yum to die inelegantly, with duplicate packages in the RPM
database.
2. Analysing the output from
/bin/rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}.rpm\n' | sort
led me to erase almost 30 new packages that appeared to be duplicates of
existing packages. This wasn't without problems though, because I used this
command:-
yum erase libgcc-4.1.2-42.el5.i386
to remove the duplication noticed here:-
libgcc-4.1.2-14.el5.i386.rpm
libgcc-4.1.2-42.el5.i386.rpm
...snip...
The best way to remove duplicate package is using rpm itself and the
--justdb switch. This will only remote entries inside the RPM database
and not on the filesytem itself. If you remove the newest version of
the duplicate packages you can run the yum update again and it will
reinstall the newer versions and all should be good.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO???
2008/6/25 mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than 30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but it is fake. This URL works for me http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/5.2/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso; or example. And what do you mean by fake ? Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Hi, On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 12:29 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to 5.2, tonight I'll upgrade the host machine but I do not expect any problems. I'm only cautious to upgrade my old webserver which is a dual PIII and is located about 100km from my home ;) I wouldn't like a kernel panic there. Regards, Michel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:30 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Micklei scribbled on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:37 PM: Thank you CentOS team for the good work! I second that! Me too !! And another donation on its way to CentOS ! :) Regards, Michel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO???
Tim Verhoeven wrote: 2008/6/25 mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I tried to download 64 bit CENTOS 5.2 DVD ISO. I already checked more than 30 download site and can NOT find it. Some site show DVD ISO in there, but it is fake. This URL works for me http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/mirror.centos.org/5.2/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso; or example. Here's another, closer to home for you :- http://ftp.tcc.edu.tw/Linux/CentOS/5.2/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If there is something in the conf file that needs to change (that
worked in 5.1 and does not in 5.2) let us know and we can add it to
the release notes and/or wiki.
It was in the listening section as follows:
# A space separated list of IP or host addresses where to listen in for
# connections. * listens in all IPv4 interfaces. [::] listens in all
IPv6
# interfaces, but may also listen in all IPv4 interfaces depending on the
# operating system. Use *, [::] for listening both IPv4 and IPv6.
#
# If you want to specify ports for each service, you will need to configure
# these settings inside the protocol imap/pop3 { ... } section, so you can
# specify different ports for IMAP/POP3. For example:
# protocol imap {
# listen = *:10143
# ssl_listen = *:10943
# ..
# }
# protocol pop3 {
# listen = *:10100
# ..
# }
listen = *
#listen = [::]
The listen bit defaults to [::]. I had to change it to * as above
otherwise I couldn't connect to it. (connection refused)
As it says above, [::] only listens on IPv4 'depending on the operating
system'. So something has changed from 5.1 to 5.2 which means that is no
longer the case.
thanks
Dunc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 5.2 upgrade mostly good (so far)
Hi Guys! Thanks to the whole Centos team for all their hard work. You have no IDEA how much I appreciate it! I ran yum upgrade last night, rebooted this morning and encountered a couple of small problems: 1. shutdown -h now goes all the way down but does not power down the box like it always has before. Same when shutting down via the GUI shutdown dialog. I can offer up machine details should anyone want them. 2. Trying to recompile the official Cisco VPN client after the reboot and it fails with this info: # make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.1.el5/build SUBDIRS=/home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-92.1.1.el5-i686' CC [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/linuxcniapi.o CC [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/frag.o CC [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/IPSecDrvOS_linux.o CC [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/interceptor.o CC [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/linuxkernelapi.o LD [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/cisco_ipsec.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST WARNING: /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/cisco_ipsec.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .data between 'interceptor_dev' (at offset 0xb4) and 'interceptor_notifier' WARNING: could not find /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/.libdriver.so.cmd for /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/libdriver.so CC /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/cisco_ipsec.mod.o LD [M] /home/fredex/myfiles/programs/cisco-vpn-client/vpnclient/cisco_ipsec.ko make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-92.1.1.el5-i686' this .libdriver.so.cmd looks like something that should be created on the fly. I've built this same version for several previous Centos kernels, so this appears to be a new phenomenon. Clues would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - pgpTdsdqRoYxD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 blues
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:39 +0200, Michel van Deventer wrote: Hi, snip I upgraded 4 machines (all virtual) without any problems from 5.1 to 5.2, tonight I'll upgrade the host machine but I do not expect any problems. I'm only cautious to upgrade my old webserver which is a dual PIII and is located about 100km from my home ;) I wouldn't like a kernel panic there. Suggestion: before rebooting, edit grub's config to default to the old kernel. Then reboot, selecting the new one. If it fails, when the machine is booted again, it will be in the old stuff. If it works, you can then edit grub's config again to default to the new one. Regards, Michel snip HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Desktop: After yum update and power off, cannot boot new Kernel
Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did yum update on my Desktop. Everything seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of getting the progress of the boot on the CRT, the screen was blank and nothing happening. I am now running off the previous Kernel on this box. Is there a fix for this, so I can use the new Kernel? This morning, I did yum upgrade on my daughter's box and that is finishing now. If I have the same problem on that box, I will follow on in this thread. TIA, Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Desktop: After yum update and power off, cannot boot new Kernel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did yum update on my Desktop. Everything seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of getting the progress of the boot on the CRT, the screen was blank and nothing happening. I am now running off the previous Kernel on this box. Is there a fix for this, so I can use the new Kernel? This morning, I did yum upgrade on my daughter's box and that is finishing now. If I have the same problem on that box, I will follow on in this thread. TIA, Lanny Could it be that you are also having this issue : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912 Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
Hi, I did a standard i386 install of 5.2 on a test machine. Then I ran the following command yum install \* and got the following error. Error: Missing Dependency: pilot-link-devel = 0.11.8 is needed by package gnome-pilot-devel Checking my local repo and my usual upstream mirrors for pilot-link-devel it's not there. [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rpm As you can see from the above pilot-link-devel is present in both i386 and x86_64 repos for 5.1 but only in the x86_64 repo for 5.2 It's not really a problem I can just leave out gnome-pilot-devel. Is this an oversight or is it deliberate. Thanks for all the good work. Now to get on to my rack of PE2950's Regards, Tony ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: A couple of security questions
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:13 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:13:39AM -0700, Scott Silva wrote: on 6-20-2008 12:41 AM Luigi Perroti spake the following: Hello, I'd like to ask a couple of things: 1) I would like to move from Debian to CentOS. One thing I will probably miss is the debsecan tool. This utility sends me a mail whenever there is a change regarding the vulnerabilities' status on my system. It lists new ones, resolved ones and current ones. Is there anything similar for CentOS? Right now the closest thing you will get is the Centos-announce list. But stay tuned... If you have access to the repositories... yum -d 0 check-update maybe? Just saw and installed yum-security on CentOS 5.x on i386. I think this is what you're looking for. Calin = Semper Fi, dude. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
Tony Molloy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rpm As you can see from the above pilot-link-devel is present in both i386 and x86_64 repos for 5.1 but only in the x86_64 repo for 5.2 you have a broken local repo eg: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Desktop: After yum update and power off, cannot boot new Kernel
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Tim Verhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yesterday, in the afternoon, I did yum update on my Desktop. Everything seemed AOK. After power down last night, when I powered on this morning, it began to boot the new Kernel and then seemed to die. Instead of getting the progress of the boot on the CRT, the screen was blank and nothing happening. I am now running off the previous Kernel on this box. Is there a fix for this, so I can use the new Kernel? This morning, I did yum upgrade on my daughter's box and that is finishing now. If I have the same problem on that box, I will follow on in this thread. TIA, Lanny Could it be that you are also having this issue : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912 Tim: I read the data for that Bug, but on my CRT, after the boot begins, and it begins reporting the progress of the boot, the screen goes completely blank and there is no HD activity. After the yum update yesterday, after I did the Reboot, it booted into the new Kernel, without any problem and I reported in the Happy Camper thread that it was a flawless upgrade. After the power down last night and power up this morning, the new Kernel will not boot and I am now running on the previous Kernel. This is a Dell Dimension 2400 with a 2.6 GHz Celeron CPU and 512 MB of RAM. I am now curious, after the yum upgrade on my daughters box finishes, if it will have the same issue. TIA, Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
Tony Molloy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rpm oop's its the -devel package you are looking for... will investigate. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
Karanbir Singh wrote: Tony Molloy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm oop's its the -devel package you are looking for... will investigate. this package isnt in the upstream distro either, so for now, I'd guess a note in the wiki ( Tim ? ) and we can keep investigating whats going on here. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote: Tony Molloy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rp m /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rp m As you can see from the above pilot-link-devel is present in both i386 and x86_64 repos for 5.1 but only in the x86_64 repo for 5.2 you have a broken local repo eg: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-0.11.8-16.i38 6.rpm - KB That's fine. It's not just my local repo it's both my usual upstream repos ( ftp.heanet.ie and ftp.mirrorservice.org ) as well. I'll just wait till they sync later today. Thank you, Tony ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: CentOS 5.2 is here!
Jun Salen wrote: I like to keep reasonably up-to-date with distributions I am running, so would like to update to Centos-5.2 as and when it is released. you will be up to date simply by running 'yum update' When 5.2 is released, those updates will be installed For the record, I upgraded my server to Centos-5.2 without any problems. It was in fact the easiest system upgrade (if you can call it that) that I recall, in many years of system upgrading. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:21:31 Karanbir Singh wrote: Tony Molloy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rp m /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm /mirrors/centos/5.2/os/x86_64/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.x86_64.rp m As you can see from the above pilot-link-devel is present in both i386 and x86_64 repos for 5.1 but only in the x86_64 repo for 5.2 you have a broken local repo eg: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.2/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-0.11.8-16.i38 6.rpm - KB I spoke too soon!!! The problem is not that pilot-link is missing that's there OK . The problem is that pilot-link-devel is missing. regards, Tony ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Full install of 5.2, missing rpm
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 14:27:27 Karanbir Singh wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: Tony Molloy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CentOS]# locate pilot-link-devel | grep centos /mirrors/centos/5.1/os/i386/CentOS/pilot-link-devel-0.11.8-16.i386.rpm oop's its the -devel package you are looking for... will investigate. this package isnt in the upstream distro either, so for now, I'd guess a note in the wiki ( Tim ? ) and we can keep investigating whats going on here. - KB As I said it's not a major problem or even a minor one ;-) Regards, Tony ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Broken upgrade to 5.2 {solved - I hope}
Tim Verhoeven wrote: The best way to remove duplicate package is using rpm itself and the --justdb switch. This will only remote entries inside the RPM database and not on the filesytem itself. If you remove the newest version of the duplicate packages you can run the yum update again and it will reinstall the newer versions and all should be good. might also want to look at the package-cleanup script included in yum-utils - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.2 upgrade mostly good (so far)
fred smith wrote: Hello. 1. shutdown -h now goes all the way down but does not power down the box like it always has before. Same when shutting down via the GUI shutdown dialog. I know this from systems with older processors. For me a 'apm=power-off' in the /etc/grub.conf kernel-line does the trick. regards Olaf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] No plugin-directory for firefox in CentOS 5.2
I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/ is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin is not installed for the new firefox (After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink it works all right) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] No plugin-directory for firefox in CentOS 5.2
Bernhard Gschaider wrote: I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/ is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin is not installed for the new firefox (After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink it works all right) installing as a user, should the flash-plugin not go into your ~/.mozilla dir ? Also, sitewide plugins are better in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ which comes from the xulrunner rpm. Atleast, thats the way I look at things, what am I missing here ? - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] What torrent are y'all using?
I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier. Would someone be kind enough to point me to a mirror with a known good torrent file? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to downgrade from CentOS 5.2 to CentOS 5.1?
Johnny Hughes wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Rudi Ahlers wrote: I've run into some trouble with a new cPanel VPS, and noticed that it's running CentOS by default, installed via the CentOS http server. My question is, how do I downgrade CentOS to 5.1? There is no way to downgrade, however you can install from a centos-5.1 tree, but centos-5.1 is 5.2 minus a bunch of security upgrades. We will eventually be moving the 5.1 tree to vault.centos.org, but if you want to use it for an extended period of time, you should probably download the tree to a local mirror. ___ Ok, I understand that, I'm just trying to avoid downloading reinstalling the software on there already. You can do: rpm -qa --last lastest_rpms then edit the file latest_rpms and see what was installed on the upgrade. You can then downgrade by hand the packages that are causing your problems or all of them using: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage --replacefiles path_to_old_package ___ Yes, I could do it like this, but this is on a fresh installation of CentOS, not an upgrade, so I have no packages to compare it to :( -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What torrent are y'all using?
Michael A. Peters wrote: I grabbed the torrent off of one of the iso mirrors, but it is coming down so slow - I have to wonder if the torrent file is the incorrect one for the bad file mentioned on the list earlier. You should be able to check the tracker, make sure its on .centos.org Here are the sha1sum's for the right .torrent files: aacb74578a98593ceabeab5c99b5ff3a1c27c72a ./x86_64/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent b5e512bd4ed3671b90711ac04d6b38423d6d7ae9 ./x86_64/CentOS-5.2-x86_64-bin-1to7.torrent 67ccaf21b9620f695a06e437cb695df5cfc23f7b ./i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-1to6.torrent 66263514382ed8b726ff94ec84bea149ec53c5f0 ./i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-bin-DVD.torrent ( apologies for the word wrap - I am sure you can still make sense of it ) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] truly minimal install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karanbir Singh wrote: | David Hláčik wrote: | My question is, which way i will achieve really minimum install (with yum). | So far, i have during install unchecked all packages , then customized | groups and removed everything including base system. | As a result my CentOS install was 800MB , which is still to much for us. | Value around 300 - 400 MB is OK. | | do a bunch of 'yum erase' runs postinstall to remove whatever you dont | need ? | If you can generate a list of packages you don't need, you can prevent them from being installed in kickstart by listing them with a -. ie: %packages ... - -evolution I found a vmware image that someone else produced. It's centos 5.1, but perhaps you could tweak that image to meet your needs. - -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIYlInHgnbf2T2QqMRAiMLAJwKS79rVcIiWddlQcGyTplmXQaE4QCgku02 z2JLYmmKGXyrf2EPEHR05es= =hTai -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
