[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0545 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 php - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0545 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0545.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/php-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-domxml-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-gd-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-mbstring-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-ncurses-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-pear-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-snmp-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/php-xmlrpc-4.3.9-3.22.12.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0544 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 php - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0544 php security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0544.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/php-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.2-48.ent.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/php-4.3.2-48.ent.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update php Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpLdYa8VCrfO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0544 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 php - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0544 php security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0544.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.2-48.ent.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/php-4.3.2-48.ent.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update php Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpYHNpBj80n3.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0544 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) php - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0544 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0544.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/php-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.2-48.ent.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/php-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.2-48.ent.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0545 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) php - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0545 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0545.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/php-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-domxml-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-gd-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-mbstring-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-ncurses-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-pear-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-snmp-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/php-xmlrpc-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/php-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-devel-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-domxml-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-gd-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-imap-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-mbstring-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-mysql-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-ncurses-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-odbc-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-pear-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-snmp-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/php-xmlrpc-4.3.9-3.22.12.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0599 Critical CentOS 3 ia64 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0599 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0599.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0599 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0599 seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0599.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.22.el3.centos3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpjFM04w7TgQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0597 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0597 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0597.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.x86_64.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.12-18.el5_2.x86_64.rpm firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.i386.rpm xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.i386.rpm xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm xulrunner-devel-unstable-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm src: devhelp-0.12-18.el5_2.src.rpm firefox-3.0.1-1.el5.centos.src.rpm xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.el5_2.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0598 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0598 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0598.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: firefox-1.5.0.12-0.21.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm src: firefox-1.5.0.12-0.21.el4.centos.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0599 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0599 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0599.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: devhelp-0.10-0.8.1.el4.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.10-0.8.1.el4.i386.rpm seamonkey-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm src: devhelp-0.10-0.8.1.el4.src.rpm seamonkey-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0599 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0599 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0599.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: devhelp-0.10-0.8.1.el4.x86_64.rpm devhelp-devel-0.10-0.8.1.el4.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm src: devhelp-0.10-0.8.1.el4.src.rpm seamonkey-1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0544 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0544 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0544.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: php-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-bcmath-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-cli-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-common-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-dba-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-devel-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-gd-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-imap-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-ldap-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-mbstring-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-mysql-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-ncurses-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-odbc-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-pdo-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-pgsql-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-snmp-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-soap-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-xml-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.x86_64.rpm src: php-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0544 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0544 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0544.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: php-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-bcmath-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-cli-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-common-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-dba-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-devel-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-gd-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-imap-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-ldap-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-mbstring-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-mysql-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-ncurses-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-odbc-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-pdo-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-pgsql-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-snmp-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-soap-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-xml-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm src: php-5.1.6-20.el5_2.1.i386.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0545 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 php Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0545 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0545.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: php-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-devel-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-domxml-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-gd-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-imap-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-ldap-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-mbstring-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-mysql-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-ncurses-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-odbc-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-pear-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-snmp-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm php-xmlrpc-4.3.9-3.22.12.x86_64.rpm src: php-4.3.9-3.22.12.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] xen 3.2
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Rudi Ahlers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Grant McWilliams wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Daniel de Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos? When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on their roadmap. Of course, you could also use Xen 3.2 from XenSource, but that's not supported here. Take care, Daniel ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt I was at a recent Linux convention and it seemed very likely that Xen is no longer Redhat's priority at all and would love to put KVM in it's place. The Redhat rep was very adamant about KVMs superiority over Xen and the amount of unnecessary work to integrate Xen into their kernels. Some day when KVM will actually do what Xen does (and do it reliably!) Xen may not be an easy option. Grant ___ So are you saying we should start looking at using KVM instead? I've never seen it, nor used it, so how much different is it from XEN? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt I personally like Xen even though it's a bit difficult sometimes. The reality is that there probably will be a Linux Virtual Machine and then there will be the other third party ones that you can run if you want to go through the trouble. Xen, VMWare, VBox etc.. are third party. KVM is and will be integrated into the OS and will be everywhere. The amount of work being done on it is frightening. However, I don't think KVM will ever do real paravirtualization as they only focus on CPUs with VT support built in. They do paravirtualize drivers but the rest is roughly equivalent to HVM in Xen. I don't use KVM in any production environment because it's not always stable. I don't use it in a development environment because it doesn't do everything I want. Both of these things will change in the future. Because of the way the KVM VMs are handled (as tasks) though I'm not sure if it will ever be very good at having one VM span multiple real pipelines. But then again I'm not sure how efficient Xen can accomplish this. I'm working on a white paper testing the capabilities and speed of the major VM technologies in various environments but I have several months of testing left before I will release it. I'll know more when I get more data. Grant ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] Error en OpenSWan - VIA PadLock not detected
Estimados listeros, Instalé CentOS 5.2 en una PC donde estoy haciendo pruebas para cambiara mi servidor VPN. Esta PC tiene una placa MSI y un procesador Inter Core 2 Duo. Configuré el OpenSWan para probar la VPN y me aparede este mensaje en el log: Jul 16 17:38:03 thli-db kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 15 Jul 16 17:38:03 thli-db ipsec_setup: Using NETKEY(XFRM) stack Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db kernel: padlock: VIA PadLock not detected. Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db kernel: padlock: VIA PadLock not detected. Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec_setup: ...Openswan IPsec started Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec_setup: Starting Openswan IPsec U2.6.14/K2.6.18-92.el5... Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec_setup: Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec_setup: Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec__plutorun: 002 added connection description LX-TH Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec__plutorun: 000 LX-TH: request to add a prospective erouted policy with netkey kernel --- experimental Jul 16 17:38:04 thli-db ipsec__plutorun: 104 LX-TH #1: STATE_MAIN_I1: initiate Cabe mencionar que la misma configuración tiene una PC más antigua de procesador y placa intel y no tiene este problema. A alguien le ha pasado algo parececido ??? quedo atento a sus comentario y/o sigerencias. Saludos y gracias de antemano. Javier. -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] OpenVPn
Hola Martin Muchas gracias por tu respuesta primero que todo Estoy configurando OPENVPN via Road Warrior, tengo mi servidor OPENVPN el una ubiciacion y tengo un cliente xp que se conecta desde su casa y que quiere conectarse a la red donde se encuentra el servidor vpn, el usario se conecta mediante el OPENVPN GUI. pero solamente puedo hacer ping hacia las maquinas de mi red pero no puedo acceder a los recuros compartidos que es lo en realidad necesito. espero me haya explicado bien y me puedas colaborar muchas gracias rene chirivi - Mensaje original De: Martin - SofPc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: miércoles, 16 de julio, 2008 12:35:36 Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] OpenVPn Hola Rene, me queda algunas dudas, tu configuraste tus servidores openvpn, pero desde donde a donde estas haciendo ping, te hace ping cualquier terminal de una de tus resdes a la otra terminal de tu otra red? En que modo tenes configurada la VPN? Martin 2008/7/15 Rene Chirivi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Buenas tardes, ya logre configurar mi openvpn pero solamente puedo hacer ping a las maquinas mas no puedo acceder a los recuros que tengo en mi red donde esta el servidor VPN, no se si toque hacerle alguna configuración especial de mis clientes winxp o al servidor VPN Agradezo su ayuda rene chirivi Yahoo! MTV Blog Rock ¡Cuéntanos tu historia, inspira una canción y gánate un viaje a los Premios MTV! Participa aquí http://mtvla.yahoo.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Martin Peirano Yahoo! MTV Blog Rock gt;¡Cuéntanos tu historia, inspira una canción y gánate un viaje a los Premios MTV! Participa aquí http://mtvla.yahoo.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Bonding and Xen
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 22:34:56 Victor Padro wrote: Does anyone has implemented this sucessfully? I am asking this because we are implementing Xen on our test lab machines, which they hold up to three 3com and intel Nics 10/100mbps based. These servers are meant to replace MS messaging and intranet webservers which holds up to 5000 hits per day and thousands of mails, and probably the Dom0 could not handle this kind of setup with only one 100mbps link, and could not afford changing all the networking hardware to gigabit, at least not yet. Any pointers perhaps? Just go the normal way. As long as you are not using VLANs on top of bonds the default bridgescripts should do just fine. Before starting with using a bond as no active/backup configuration I urge you to read and understand the bonding.txt from the kernel-source: http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt or just websearcch: bonding.txt The problem is not to configure the bonding on a linux-machine but to get the network setup right (Etherchannel, LACP, one switch or multiple switches, etc.) and know what to expect from which setup. And last but not least human communication between network guys and os-guys. That are the biggest problem with bonding in my experience. -marc. Greetings from Mexico. -- It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion. Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas -- Gruss / Regards, Marc Grimme http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question regarding mx servers with same priority
Thanks guys for the immediate reply.. anyway based on your nice sugeestions i feel that having a mail server with different MX records would be definately better than having 2 servers with the same MX since i was confused about which setup to be used setting up 2 server with same MX or one with higher n one with lower priority thnks once again regards fabian On Wed, Jul 16, 2008, fabian dacunha wrote: Dear ALL I have the following setup running good for quite sometime and i wd really apprecite if someone wd help or give some suggestions centos 5.1 sendmail dns server now recently our mail usage has increased considerably and moreover Mails have become a utmost top priority i have 2 options now 1) have a backup server with lower higher MX i tested this setup n had some queries earlier n thanks to guys like scott for some prfect advise i did manage to check it out n it works beautiful 2) have another server with same value of MX so it cd load balance and also doc says if one server is down or unavaliable the oher server would receive mail now my query is ... if i now configure a second mail server with same MX priority . Having multiple servers with the same MX priority works fine (I prefer to think of this as distance as the lower ones have higher priority). There's no good reason to have multiple distances other than the shortest for final delivery and one or more with higher in case the primary is not available for some reason. a) do i have to create all the existing user accounts on my existing email server to this new server cause i already hav about 300+ email users already No, the secondary MX server(s) don't need any user accounts. Using postfix, we do generate a virtual file for each secondary MX server containing all the valid addresses for the domain(s) served by the primary server, allowing the MX servers to reject invalid accounts without having real user accounts. There are some good arguments for having a single MX server rather than multiple MX servers as it prevents spammers from attempting to deliver mail through the higher distance MX servers which may well not have the same anti-spam rules. At one of our regional ISP customers with about 10,000 e- mail accounts, we use a single MX server to accept incoming messages, This server runs postfix, amavisd-new, and clamav to pre-screen incoming messages for worms (Windows is the Virus) and phishing messages, then it forwards clean messages to a cluster of systems that do spamassassin checking and message delivery to the user's Maildir message stores which are NFS mounted on a central server. The MX server in this case rejects about 2,000,000 messages a day using a variety of IP filters, and delivers about 250,000 messages a day. It has a load average less than 1.00 except during the daily maintenance and security audits. It actually is the primary MX server for two distinct groups of domains, each with a separate user base. Each machine that is home to the user's home directories updates its own section of the postfix virtual table, using rsync to update the MX server whenever anything changes with the users. The MX server uses the postfix transport file to direct mail to the appropriate cluster servers to deliver mail. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax:(206) 232-9186 People from East Germany have found the West so confusing. It's so much easier when you have only one party. -- Linus Torvalde, Linux Expo Canada when asked about confusion over many Linux distributions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
Rudi Ahlers schrieb: This isn't the right place, but a bit of help is always welcome :) Windows XP, as with most other Windows' has the irritating habit of pilling up junk in the registry, and other places. My first check is always to check for viruses - update the virus definitions, and scan the PC thoroughly, do a scan disk defrag, and then try a registry repair tool. Other than that, a re installation is your best bet. Anything that takes longer than 30 minutes is better solved with a re-install (with Windows). Too bad that you have to re-install all the shiny applications, too (which takes ages, usually). But then, CentOS throws most of its stuff in /usr/bin and /bin, too, so you can't differentiate between OS and applications, either. I'd rather have a base install and a separate directory with all the rest. And of course, two different RPM-dbs, too. cu, Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 02:03:26 MHR wrote: I know this isn't the right forum for this (do I ever!), but you-all know so much about everything I thought I'd ask. About two months ago I resurrected my daughter's Compaq laptop (cracked screen - replaced it) and ran an update on it. It's running Windows XP, SP1 (I think), but since the update it has run about 1/3 as fast as it used to. Does anyone know if there was a WXP update that killed performance on laptops? None of my other XP installs, SP1 or SP2, suffers from this. (Actually, I should say their other 'cuz I don't use Windows unless I can't avoid it, and then I try to do it on my WXP VM where it's still relatively safe.) Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
Anne Wilson wrote: Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. I've installed SP3 on dozens of systems and seen no slowdowns. this is WAY off topic for this list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] pear
Hi, is it safe to install additional modules to pear with pear install? I need php-pear-MDB2 which is in CentosPlus but does not contain php-pear-MDB2_Driver_xxx. So I did: yum install php-pear-MDB2 pear upgrade MDB2 pear install MDB2#mysql Thanks, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: need texlive lyx-1.55 for Centos 5.2
Paul Johnson wrote: Today I installed the newest Centos I could find and encountered the old software problem. I couldn't find any third party repositories that have TexLive to replace tetex. Ii tried the Fedora version, but it calls for a different libpoppler. LyX in Centos is aged as well. EPEL includes lyx-1.4, an older qt3-based version. The version of qt4 included in rhel5 is... dated. -- Rex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Bonding and Xen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor Padro Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:34 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bonding and Xen We're not using windows under Xen, we're trying to get rid of M$(reducing licensing fees mostly). Pray tell, what are you replacing Exchange with? My end users are dependent on Exchange for calendaring but organization is becoming more and more anti MS and it won't be long before they decide enough is enough, especially being that some savvy users refused to upgrade to Vista and are now using CentOS as their preferred desktop. These savvy users are software developers who were previously using XP and multiple PuTTY sessions to get the job done! Cheers, AK. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with mod_proxy_ajp.so
2008/7/15 Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, After updating httpd package it outputs an error when restarting apache. Problem was workarounded commenting out line 2 of /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so Starting httpd: httpd: Syntax error on line 210 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Syntax error on line 3 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/proxy_ajp.conf: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so: undefined symbol: proxy_module. Have you built any Non-RPM apache modules. Is this an i386 or x86_64 version of CentOS-5 ... and if it is x86_64, do you have both versions of apache installed? It's a x86_64 version of httpd (I have i386 packages too, but all of apache are x86_64 packages) Also: file /usr/sbin/httpd /usr/sbin/httpd: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped file /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), stripped I have checked both the i386 and x86_64 versions and they start by default with no undefined symbols. When I issue /etc/httpd/conf.d/proxy_ajp.conf, it outputs: httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 I am using Centos 5 and and httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 Could you help me to find a better solution? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centralized patch management
Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? Thanks! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:08:31AM -0500, Terry wrote: Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? For RHEL, at work we use RHN Satellite. For CentOS we don't currently deploy enough to warrant anything although you might look at CFengine or puppet. In addition, Spacewalk is the recently opened version of RHN Satellite and it should be able to run with CentOS. I don't think it's a perfect solution yet however as it still requires Oracle on the back-end and I don't believe you can run it with RHEL and CentOS machines simultaneously (someone correct me if I'm wrong). http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/ Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
Terry wrote: Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? Set up a local repo and point all your systems to it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anne Wilson Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 4:11 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown? On Wednesday 16 July 2008 02:03:26 MHR wrote: I know this isn't the right forum for this (do I ever!), but you-all know so much about everything I thought I'd ask. About two months ago I resurrected my daughter's Compaq laptop (cracked screen - replaced it) and ran an update on it. It's running Windows XP, SP1 (I think), but since the update it has run about 1/3 as fast as it used to. Does anyone know if there was a WXP update that killed performance on laptops? None of my other XP installs, SP1 or SP2, suffers from this. (Actually, I should say their other 'cuz I don't use Windows unless I can't avoid it, and then I try to do it on my WXP VM where it's still relatively safe.) Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne Depending on how SP3 was installed you can Uninstall it. From Add Remove Programs. JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Terry wrote: Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? Set up a local repo and point all your systems to it. Our issue isn't bandwidth. Our issue is controlling which patches are to be deployed and at what time. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Terry wrote: I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? here's a reasonably straightforward scheme: 1) make sure yum is installed on all your systems (if you have RHEL4 boxes) 2) host your own yum repository 3) install an appropriate myrepo.conf in /etc/yum.repos.d on all your hosts at this point you have a few options: a) mirror the upstream base and updates repos for your architectures into your local repo and remove all the other contents of /etc/ yum.repos.d on all your hosts. this gives you the maximum control over when patches go out to your machines; unfortunately, capturing updates from RH is a bit arduous (one way to do is is to run one machine per architecture that has an RHN subscription, capture all the packages it downloads, and copy them into your local repository) and, especially if you're manually approving each package that gets copied over, it can introduce delay in the deployment of patches. b) let your systems pull updates from RHN or from CentOS mirrors as normal, and add any additional packages via your custom repo. this scheme requires less effort, but may not be as centralized as you desire. both of these schemes scale to accommodate other third-party repositories, though you have to think about whether you want other repositories to clobber packages from your distribution. these should also scale to accommodate other RPM-based distributions. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Terry wrote: Our issue isn't bandwidth. Our issue is controlling which patches are to be deployed and at what time. ok, then you want option a) from my previous response. if you're the gatekeeper of all packages that go into your private repository, and if your systems aren't pulling packages from any other repos, then i would think that would give you the necessary degree of control. you may find Dag's mrepo tool (http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/mrepo/) useful for building this infrastructure. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
Terry wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Terry wrote: Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? Set up a local repo and point all your systems to it. Our issue isn't bandwidth. Our issue is controlling which patches are to be deployed and at what time. Unless your systems are scattered all over the Internet, you probably should still run a centralized repo server for the Centos systems. You can also put all your 'special' rpms there. Then whatever you use to schedule what patches when, would get them without relying on how the mirrors are working. Plus what you pull down would be input into what you need to distrubute (rather than plowing through the update announce messages). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
Terry schrieb: Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? I investigated this earlier. The only thing that seems halfway usable is pakiti: http://pakiti.sourceforge.net/ People who think that running yum update every night is a solution should go back and do some research. This is how it might work at home (mostly), but not the way you deploy patches to a large number of systems who serve different purposes and thus have different package-selections, user-requirements, patch-policies and downtime-schemas etc.pp. I hope to be able to test pakiti soon. cheers, Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bonding and Xen
From: Anthony Kamau -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor Padro Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2008 8:34 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Bonding and Xen We're not using windows under Xen, we're trying to get rid of M$(reducing licensing fees mostly). Pray tell, what are you replacing Exchange with? My end users are dependent on Exchange for calendaring but organization is becoming more and more anti MS and it won't be long before they decide enough is enough, especially being that some savvy users refused to upgrade to Vista and are now using CentOS as their preferred desktop. These savvy users are software developers who were previously using XP and multiple PuTTY sessions to get the job done! I am currently testing Sun Java Communications Suite 5 on Centos 5.2 http://www.sun.com/software/communications_suite/index.xml which seems to be a good alternative for Exchange. There is a free Outlook connector and the documentation is very good. Its free, if you don't need technical support. Regards Lars ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Xorg intel driver on 965Q lockup?
I have exactly the same problem. Could you please send the xorg.conf file that works using vesa driver? Thanks Antonio ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne Anne Sp3 doesn't kill performance if applied to a fresh install before any other updates or apps are applied / installed Installing sp3 on top of sp2 just because is realistically not a good thing... - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: question regarding mx servers with same priority
on 7-16-2008 12:42 AM fabian dacunha spake the following: Thanks guys for the immediate reply.. anyway based on your nice sugeestions i feel that having a mail server with different MX records would be definately better than having 2 servers with the same MX since i was confused about which setup to be used setting up 2 server with same MX or one with higher n one with lower priority thnks once again Just remember to have adequate spam and virus scanning on the backup MX also. Because it will be hammered with most of the junk eventually. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
I've installed it on a half dozen machines here as part of a test. No issues that I can see. All are XP Pro with SP2 and some IE6, some IE7. All upgraded to IE7 after, if they were IE6. I DID take images (Clonezilla!) of those machines before I installed Just a habit I got into years ago. (Taking images before major changes, not Clonezilla. I used to use Imagecast...) Dennis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert - elists Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:59 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: RE: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown? Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne Anne Sp3 doesn't kill performance if applied to a fresh install before any other updates or apps are applied / installed Installing sp3 on top of sp2 just because is realistically not a good thing... - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer Duffner wrote: | But then, CentOS throws most of its stuff in /usr/bin and /bin, too, so | you can't differentiate between OS and applications, either. | | I'd rather have a base install and a separate directory with all the | rest. And of course, two different RPM-dbs, too. | That's what rpm is for. - -- Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 306-717-8737 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIfhHhHgnbf2T2QqMRAhkVAJ4j5b3fhfjdvIDNhQBATS/S4BtQHQCgjPDN XqolbHg7uIMUtaZh74uj7oA= =z7o1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Ray Van Dolson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In addition, Spacewalk is the recently opened version of RHN Satellite and it should be able to run with CentOS. I don't think it's a perfect solution yet however as it still requires Oracle on the back-end and I don't believe you can run it with RHEL and CentOS machines simultaneously (someone correct me if I'm wrong). http://www.redhat.com/spacewalk/ Spacewalk handles both distros just fine, it just can't have them both in the same organization. This is because both distros provide the same versions of the same packages, with different signatures. The oracle bit isn't a huge deal, because it can use the free/development version just fine. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: pear
on 7-16-2008 3:06 AM � spake the following: Hi, is it safe to install additional modules to pear with pear install? I need php-pear-MDB2 which is in CentosPlus but does not contain php-pear-MDB2_Driver_xxx. So I did: yum install php-pear-MDB2 pear upgrade MDB2 pear install MDB2#mysql Thanks, David Isn't a little late to ask if something is safe AFTER you do it? ;-P -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a ton of stuff
I've got a Centos 4 box at work, where I noticed a pile of old kernels lying around and no longer needed. I did rpm -qa | grep -y kernel list then edited the list to remove from it the newer kernels, then yum remove `cat list`. Yum has come up with a list of 71 packages it wants to remove, even though there were only 33 kernel-related RPMs in the list. this doesn't seem right to me, as it is trying to remove a bunch of KDE files, net-snmp stuff, freeradius, etc. I show the entire list below. This certainly does NOT seem right to me. Anyone care to enlighten me? Given that it wants to do this, I'm thinking I'd be better off to just do rpm -e `cat list` instead. Fred = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Removing: kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 28 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL installed 11 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-utilsi386 1:2.4-13.1.105 installed 1.6 M Removing for dependencies: freeradius i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 3.8 M freeradius-mysqli386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 6.2 k freeradius-postgresql i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 6.8 k freeradius-unixODBC i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 7.0 k hpoji386 0.91-9 installed 799 k hpoj-devel i386 0.91-9 installed 47 k kdeaddons i386 3.3.1-2 installed 6.8 M kdeaddons-atlantikdesigner i386 3.3.1-2 installed 171 k kdeaddons-xmms i386 3.3.1-2 installed 175 k kdeadmini386 7:3.3.1-2installed 844 k kdeartwork i386 3.3.1-2 installed 9.6 M kdeartwork-iconsi386 3.3.1-2 installed 11 M kdebase i386 6:3.3.1-7.el4.centos installed 45 M kdebase-devel i386 6:3.3.1-7.el4.centos installed 224 k kdegamesi386 6:3.3.1-2installed 15 M kdegames-devel i386 6:3.3.1-2installed 414 k kdegraphics i386 7:3.3.1-9.el4_6 installed 11 M kdegraphics-devel i386 7:3.3.1-9.el4_6 installed 61 k kdemultimedia i386 6:3.3.1-2installed 17 M
Re: [CentOS] Re: pear
Scott Silva napsal(a): Isn't a little late to ask if something is safe AFTER you do it? ;-P On testing virtual? ;-P As it is not safe to use cpan to install modules for perl, I was asking if pear is the same or not. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a ton of stuff
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:55 AM, fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a Centos 4 box at work, where I noticed a pile of old kernels lying around and no longer needed. I did rpm -qa | grep -y kernel list then edited the list to remove from it the newer kernels, then yum remove `cat list`. Yum has come up with a list of 71 packages it wants to remove, even though there were only 33 kernel-related RPMs in the list. this doesn't seem right to me, as it is trying to remove a bunch of KDE files, net-snmp stuff, freeradius, etc. I show the entire list below. This certainly does NOT seem right to me. Anyone care to enlighten me? Given that it wants to do this, I'm thinking I'd be better off to just do rpm -e `cat list` instead. Fred = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Removing: kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 28 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL installed 11 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-utilsi386 1:2.4-13.1.105 installed 1.6 M Removing for dependencies: freeradius i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 3.8 M freeradius-mysqli386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 6.2 k freeradius-postgresql i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 6.8 k freeradius-unixODBC i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 7.0 k hpoji386 0.91-9 installed 799 k hpoj-devel i386 0.91-9 installed 47 k kdeaddons i386 3.3.1-2 installed 6.8 M kdeaddons-atlantikdesigner i386 3.3.1-2 installed 171 k kdeaddons-xmms i386 3.3.1-2 installed 175 k kdeadmini386 7:3.3.1-2installed 844 k kdeartwork i386 3.3.1-2 installed 9.6 M kdeartwork-iconsi386 3.3.1-2 installed 11 M kdebase i386 6:3.3.1-7.el4.centos installed 45 M kdebase-devel i386 6:3.3.1-7.el4.centos installed 224 k kdegamesi386 6:3.3.1-2installed 15 M kdegames-devel i386 6:3.3.1-2installed 414 k kdegraphics i386 7:3.3.1-9.el4_6 installed 11 M kdegraphics-devel i386
Re: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a ton of stuff
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:55 AM, fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a Centos 4 box at work, where I noticed a pile of old kernels lying around and no longer needed. I did rpm -qa | grep -y kernel list then edited the list to remove from it the newer kernels, then yum remove `cat list`. Yum has come up with a list of 71 packages it wants to remove, even though there were only 33 kernel-related RPMs in the list. this doesn't seem right to me, as it is trying to remove a bunch of KDE files, net-snmp stuff, freeradius, etc. I show the entire list below. would need to see list to know whats causing the problem... without that we are shooting in the wind. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a ton of stuff
fred smith wrote: I've got a Centos 4 box at work, where I noticed a pile of old kernels lying around and no longer needed. I did rpm -qa | grep -y kernel list then edited the list to remove from it the newer kernels, then yum remove `cat list`. Yum has come up with a list of 71 packages it wants to remove, even though there were only 33 kernel-related RPMs in the list. this doesn't seem right to me, as it is trying to remove a bunch of KDE files, net-snmp stuff, freeradius, etc. I show the entire list below. This certainly does NOT seem right to me. Anyone care to enlighten me? Given that it wants to do this, I'm thinking I'd be better off to just do rpm -e `cat list` instead. Fred = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Removing: kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 28 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 27 M kernel i686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 28 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 11 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-develi686 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL installed 11 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-hugemem-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp i686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 29 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.12.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL installed 12 M kernel-smp-develi686 2.6.9-55.EL installed 12 M kernel-utilsi386 1:2.4-13.1.105 installed 1.6 M Removing for dependencies: freeradius i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 3.8 M freeradius-mysqli386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 6.2 k freeradius-postgresql i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 6.8 k freeradius-unixODBC i386 1.0.1-3.RHEL4.5 installed 7.0 k hpoji386 0.91-9 installed 799 k hpoj-devel i386 0.91-9 installed 47 k kdeaddons i386 3.3.1-2 installed 6.8 M kdeaddons-atlantikdesigner i386 3.3.1-2 installed 171 k kdeaddons-xmms i386 3.3.1-2 installed 175 k kdeadmini386 7:3.3.1-2installed 844 k kdeartwork i386 3.3.1-2 installed 9.6 M kdeartwork-iconsi386 3.3.1-2 installed 11 M kdebase i386 6:3.3.1-7.el4.centos installed 45 M kdebase-devel i386 6:3.3.1-7.el4.centos installed 224 k kdegamesi386 6:3.3.1-2installed 15 M kdegames-devel i386 6:3.3.1-2installed 414 k kdegraphics i386 7:3.3.1-9.el4_6 installed 11 M kdegraphics-devel i386 7:3.3.1-9.el4_6 installed 61 k kdemultimedia i386 6:3.3.1-2installed 17
Re: [CentOS] Re: pear
David Hrbáč wrote: Scott Silva napsal(a): Isn't a little late to ask if something is safe AFTER you do it? ;-P On testing virtual? ;-P As it is not safe to use cpan to install modules for perl, I was asking if pear is the same or not. It is exactly the same and for the same reasons. If you need something, look in DAG or EPEL or ATRPMS and if it is not there, I would build it if I were you. The issues are that when there is a pear or php upgrade, it might replace your files or configuration ... also any RPMS that might need that require will probably not see it since it is not in the RPM database. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a to n of stuff
Johnny Hughes wrote: You are trying to remove kernel-utils ...you don't want to do that. That might cut back the deps a bit. Also, i never remove packages with yum, but with: rpm -e `cat list` But, that is just my advise. I didn't think there was any functional difference between: rpm -e package-name and yum remove package-name Isn't yum just a front-end for the rpm system? -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: pear
Johnny Hughes napsal(a): It is exactly the same and for the same reasons. If you need something, look in DAG or EPEL or ATRPMS and if it is not there, I would build it if I were you. I think so, then I do not see the point of providing centosplus php-pear-MDB2 without having DB driver packages. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown?
Dennis McLeod wrote: I've installed it on a half dozen machines here as part of a test. No issues that I can see. All are XP Pro with SP2 and some IE6, some IE7. All upgraded to IE7 after, if they were IE6. I DID take images (Clonezilla!) of those machines before I installed Just a habit I got into years ago. (Taking images before major changes, not Clonezilla. I used to use Imagecast...) Dennis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert - elists Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:59 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: RE: [CentOS] OT - Windows slowdown? Applying SP3 to my daughter's laptop has killed performance to the point of being almost unusable. Restore Points seem to be lost, so I can't go back to before it. Anne Anne Sp3 doesn't kill performance if applied to a fresh install before any other updates or apps are applied / installed Installing sp3 on top of sp2 just because is realistically not a good thing... - rh Hey guys, could you please move this thread where it should be: In a Winblows mailing list... I don't think that the CentOS mailing list is the right place to discuss about Winblows... On top of that, top posting is irritating at best. http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16 (item 2, Guidelines for CentOS Mailing List posts) Thanks for your understanding and have a great day. Guy Boisvert, ing. IngTegration inc. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a to n of stuff
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 at 12:21pm, Bowie Bailey wrote I didn't think there was any functional difference between: rpm -e package-name and yum remove package-name Isn't yum just a front-end for the rpm system? yum also does dependency checking/resolution. -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: pear
David Hrbáč wrote: Johnny Hughes napsal(a): It is exactly the same and for the same reasons. If you need something, look in DAG or EPEL or ATRPMS and if it is not there, I would build it if I were you. I think so, then I do not see the point of providing centosplus php-pear-MDB2 without having DB driver packages. The point is that it's required for some dependency in that repo, and the other thing you asked about was not required. We are not trying to replace DAG or EPEL in centosplus or centos-extras ... so the only things that are in there are things that are absolutely required for repo closure if the repo itself. In this particular case: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# repoquery --repoid=centosplus --repoid=extras --repoid=base --repoid=updates --whatrequires php-pear(MDB2) php-pear-Log-0:1.9.9-1.el4.centos.noarch = So, we needed php-pear-MDB2 to be able to use php-pear-Log ... and that is required by 2 other packages in the Plus repo, so that is why its there. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a to n of stuff
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't think there was any functional difference between: rpm -e package-name and yum remove package-name Isn't yum just a front-end for the rpm system? Even if that were completely true, it's not a good idea to mix different commands, especially for installing or removing packages. If you use rpm to find what you want to remove, remove it with rpm. And - ditto to what everyone else already said. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] FW: Conga question
From: Lopez, Denise Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:14 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Conga question Hi all, I am trying to setup a high-availablility cluster using CentOS 5.2. All packages are currently up2date using yum. I would like to use it for automatic failover of Xen virtualized servers eventually. Right now I am just trying to create a new cluster with 2 Dell PowerEdge 1950 nodes. I have a separate luci server. One of the nodes connects just fine and the other one is hanging. On each node, a clustat displays that both nodes are online. I don't have anything else configured past the Create a Cluster page (ie. fencing, services, share resources). On the luci server, I keep getting the following error: Unable to retrieve batch 640093076 status from hostname:1: module scheduled for execution Does anyone know what could be causing this. Port 1 is open to all tcp on both nodes and I show an established connection with the node using netstat -antulp. For right now, the xend service is turned off on both nodes. Thanks in advance. Denise Lopez UCLA - Center for Digital Humanities Network Services Linux Systems Engineer 337 Charles E. Young Drive East PPB 1020 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1499 310/206-8216 image001.jpg___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a to n of stuff
Johnny Hughes wrote: Bowie Bailey wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: You are trying to remove kernel-utils ...you don't want to do that. That might cut back the deps a bit. Also, i never remove packages with yum, but with: rpm -e `cat list` But, that is just my advise. I didn't think there was any functional difference between: rpm -e package-name and yum remove package-name Isn't yum just a front-end for the rpm system? There is a huge difference. rpm -e will tell you that you package foo (that you want to install) is required by package bar, so don't install it. Yum will resolve all the dependancies and try to remove foo and bar and anything else that is required to be removed if bar is removed, etc. If you are not careful, you can get things like glibc removed with yum remove. I normally want to resolve my own deps if I remove something. I once DID remove glibc from a machine with yum remove ... and that is NOT pretty to recover from :D That makes sense. I am always very careful about reviewing the dependency list when using yum for installing or removing packages, but I can see how you might accidentally remove something you didn't intend to. -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? i would say Pulp fits the bill from what you have said https://fedorahosted.org/pulp ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: pear
David Hrbáč wrote: Johnny Hughes napsal(a): The point is that it's required for some dependency in that repo, and the other thing you asked about was not required. We are not trying to replace DAG or EPEL in centosplus or centos-extras ... so the only things that are in there are things that are absolutely required for repo closure if the repo itself. In this particular case: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# repoquery --repoid=centosplus --repoid=extras --repoid=base --repoid=updates --whatrequires php-pear(MDB2) php-pear-Log-0:1.9.9-1.el4.centos.noarch = So, we needed php-pear-MDB2 to be able to use php-pear-Log ... and that is required by 2 other packages in the Plus repo, so that is why its there. Johnny, MDB2 is optional dependency for Log and it comes with dependency for DB driver. MDB2 id database abstraction layer, without drivers it does nothing and Log is not able to log to database via MDB2. So, there's really no point of providing only MDB2 package. That may be true, however, the way the RPMS are set up, it is showing up as a require to install the Log rpm to have php-pear-MDB2 installed ... I did not write the spec file, I just built it. So, it is there because if I do a repo closure, it has to be there. If you can't find the other RPMS in other places I can add them ... but I have to have repoclosure. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:08:06 +0200 From: Rainer Duffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Terry schrieb: Hello, I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel. What is everyone else doing in this arena? I investigated this earlier. The only thing that seems halfway usable is pakiti: http://pakiti.sourceforge.net/ People who think that running yum update every night is a solution should go back and do some research. This is how it might work at home (mostly), but not the way you deploy patches to a large number of systems who serve different purposes and thus have different package-selections, user-requirements, patch-policies and downtime-schemas etc.pp. I hope to be able to test pakiti soon. cheers, Rainer ___ Ok, so what would you suggest is a good practice for a hosting environment with a few different RH based (CentOS Fedora Core) servers, all doing different stuff? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Ok, so what would you suggest is a good practice for a hosting environment with a few different RH based (CentOS Fedora Core) servers, all doing different stuff? do you have test/staging servers for each of these production environments? without such, there's really not much you can do, short of manually patching and praying. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] openldap package compilation flags?
Hello All. How do I find out what flags were used to compile the Centos openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 rpm package? I'm specifically wondering if it was compiled with --enable-lmpasswd Thanks! -- Flambeau Inc. Technology Center - Baraboo, WI Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu KeyID: 0x00E9EC2C ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Lost my madwifi setup
I rebuilt my notebook that has the atheros card in it, and forgot to save all of my setup to get it working. I am using dkms and the madwifi rpms from rpmforge. My modprobe.conf has a line: alias wifi0 ath_pci I can ifconfig wifi0 up But the command: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -dd -D madwifi -i wifi0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf fails. Now some of my old notes mention using ath0 and a line in modprobe.conf of: alias ath0 ath_pci options ath_pci autocreate=sta I think there were some iwconfig commands somewhere too. But it is all gone... sniff. I hope someone can help? I am going through this list's archives trying to find my old messages too. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost my madwifi setup
Oh, I should add that if I use NetworkManager, it scans the SSID, but fails to connect. I personally have had a very high failure rate with NetworkManger. Robert Moskowitz wrote: I rebuilt my notebook that has the atheros card in it, and forgot to save all of my setup to get it working. I am using dkms and the madwifi rpms from rpmforge. My modprobe.conf has a line: alias wifi0 ath_pci I can ifconfig wifi0 up But the command: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -dd -D madwifi -i wifi0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf fails. Now some of my old notes mention using ath0 and a line in modprobe.conf of: alias ath0 ath_pci options ath_pci autocreate=sta I think there were some iwconfig commands somewhere too. But it is all gone... sniff. I hope someone can help? I am going through this list's archives trying to find my old messages too. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SERIOUSLY OT STREAM EDITING IMAGES
Tony Placilla wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:57 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Geldenhuis wrote: Hi All, I have been Googling my head off but cannot find a method to stream edit all the images in a directory and to resize them. I have a large number of images of up to 3GB in size that I want to put in albums on a website, but before I do this I need to resize them to a more realistic configuration. I know how to do this manually with the GIMP but it becomes tedious for more than a few images. imagemagick can do this, its a command line batch image editor. its a little tricky to figure out. I note its in the base Centos5 repository. docs on http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php for example: mogrify -size 480x320 *.jpg will convert all the jpgs to 480x320 mogrify -size 480x320 *.jpg will resize everything bigger than 480x320 down leave the smaller stuff alone. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Once again thanks to all who responded - ImageMagick is just that magic. ChrisG ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost my madwifi setup
Getting closer, see below... Robert Moskowitz wrote: I rebuilt my notebook that has the atheros card in it, and forgot to save all of my setup to get it working. I am using dkms and the madwifi rpms from rpmforge. My modprobe.conf has a line: alias wifi0 ath_pci I can ifconfig wifi0 up But the command: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -dd -D madwifi -i wifi0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf I think I need a: ifconfig ath0 up And the wpa_supplicant line should be: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -B -dd -K -D madwifi -i ath0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf But this is still not working. I think there is something I need to do with wlanconfig? fails. Now some of my old notes mention using ath0 and a line in modprobe.conf of: alias ath0 ath_pci options ath_pci autocreate=sta I think there were some iwconfig commands somewhere too. But it is all gone... sniff. I hope someone can help? I am going through this list's archives trying to find my old messages too. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openldap package compilation flags?
tblader wrote:
Hello All.
How do I find out what flags were used to compile
the Centos openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 rpm package?
I'm specifically wondering if it was compiled with
--enable-lmpasswd
Thanks!
If you download the SRPM and install it, then you can look at the spec file.
Server is built like this:
--enable-plugins \
--enable-slapd \
--enable-slurpd \
--enable-multimaster \
--enable-bdb \
--enable-hdb \
--enable-ldap \
--enable-ldbm \
--with-ldbm-api=%{ldbm_backend} \
--enable-meta \
--enable-monitor \
--enable-null \
--enable-shell \
--enable-sql=mod \
--disable-perl \
--disable-shared \
--disable-dynamic \
--enable-static \
--with-kerberos=k5only
Client like this:
--disable-slapd \
--disable-slurpd \
--enable-shared \
--enable-dynamic \
--enable-static \
--without-kerberos \
--with-pic
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum remove old kernel pkgs -- wants to remove a ton of stuff
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:09:36AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: fred smith wrote: I've got a Centos 4 box at work, where I noticed a pile of old kernels lying around and no longer needed. I did rpm -qa | grep -y kernel list then edited the list to remove from it the newer kernels, then yum remove `cat list`. Yum has come up with a list of 71 packages it wants to remove, even though there were only 33 kernel-related RPMs in the list. this doesn't seem right to me, as it is trying to remove a bunch of KDE files, net-snmp stuff, freeradius, etc. I show the entire list below. This certainly does NOT seem right to me. Anyone care to enlighten me? Given that it wants to do this, I'm thinking I'd be better off to just do rpm -e `cat list` instead. Fred = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Removing: snippage kernel-utilsi386 1:2.4-13.1.105 installed 1.6 M snippage Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 71 Package(s) Total download size: 0 Is this ok [y/N]: You are trying to remove kernel-utils ...you don't want to do that. That might cut back the deps a bit. Also, i never remove packages with yum, but with: rpm -e `cat list` But, that is just my advise. Thanks to Johnny and all the others who pointed out the stupid thing I was trying to do. I'll follow the advice to clean up 'list' before trying it again. -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - pgpkGHafxPcV9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Yun Update problem
Tony Molloy wrote: On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:47:51 Tony Molloy wrote: On Tuesday 15 July 2008 18:34:51 Kenneth Burgener wrote: On 7/15/2008 9:57 AM, Tony Molloy wrote: (34/92): selinux-policy-2 100% |=| 381 kB 00:00 http://thomond.csis.ul.ie/mirrors/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux- po licy-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download The rpm packages are in my local repo. Is this just a case of my local upstream mirrors being out of sync or have I got a bigger problem. I have seen this error before. I am not sure if the local cache is corrupted or my local repository is corrupted/out of sync. To fix this in the past I usually do a yum clean all and try again. If that doesn't work I delete the problem packages from my local repository, and do a repository sync. Kenneth Thanks for the reply, That's exactly what I did but till have the same problem. It may be that the 2 upstream repos that I sync my local repo to are corrupted. This is the first time I've used the x86_64 repos. When I get a chance I'll try and use a different repo and see what happens. Tony These are internal machines so I had to set up a proxy to get external access. Then I removed my local repos and used the mirrorlist line in the repos definitions and the fastestmirror plugin and the update went OK. So it must be a problem with my 2 upstream mirrors. I'll get onto the mirror masters and try and sort it out with them. Tony Alle, FYI, I installed two x86_64 boxes by hand from a freshly downloaded DVD.iso. The first thing I did was update yum on both machines then ran a yum update. I have no local or third party repositories, but the error was the same for the same packages: (170/189): selinux-policy 100% |=| 911 kB 00:01 http://ftp2.riken.jp/Linux/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download Trying other mirror. http://ftp.iij.ad.jp/pub/linux/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/Linux/CentOS/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://ftp.tcc.edu.tw/Linux/CentOS/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://ftp.daum.net/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://ftp.hostrino.com/pub/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://rsync.atworks.co.jp/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://centos.mirror.cdnetworks.com/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. http://ftp.stu.edu.tw/Linux/CentOS/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror. ftp://ftp.oss.eznetsols.org/linux/centos/5.2/updates/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: [Errno ftp error] Requested Range Not Satisfiable due to unobtainable file length. Trying other mirror. (171/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 8.1 MB 00:13 (172/189): gnutls-1.4.1-3 100% |=| 364 kB 00:00 (173/189): kernel-2.6.18- 100% |=| 16 MB 00:26 (174/189): libvorbis-deve 100% |=| 542 kB 00:01 (175/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 15 MB 00:24 (176/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 15 MB 00:24 (177/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 583 kB 00:01 (178/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 737 kB 00:01 (179/189): scim-bridge-gt 100% |=| 37 kB 00:00 (180/189): openldap-clien 100% |=| 186 kB 00:00 (181/189): ipsec-tools-0. 100% |=| 363 kB 00:00 (182/189): cups-1.2.4-11. 100% |=| 2.7 MB 00:06 (183/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 748 kB 00:01 (184/189): openldap-serve 100% |=| 2.2 MB 00:05 (185/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 15 MB 00:24 (186/189): openoffice.org 100% |=| 191 kB 00:00 (187/189): ruby-1.8.5-5.e 100% |=| 279 kB 00:00 (188/189): Deployment_Gui 100% |=| 3.3 MB 00:05 (189/189):
[CentOS] Getting printer to work under 5.2
Hi I have a standard hplip install on my 5.2 box installed from the repos (it originally was installed from the 5.1 disks and followed any upgrade that may have occured in the transition to 5.2). My printer is a HP Deskjet F4180 connecting via USB. I can't get the printer to work. Documents manually printed from the file menu in OO.o 2.3 stagnate in a print queue, while the print icon produces an unspecified error. The cups daemon is running (it has been stopped and restarted a couple of times, along with a reboot just to be sure even though I knew it likely wouldn't affect things.) The standard hplip was uninstalled, and mannually installed from the HP website, with all dependencies resolved (rather frustrating to go through five dependency installs one at a time since the manual install of hplip only mentions them one at a time. :) ) This still didn't work. The manual install was uninstalled and the standard install from the repos was reinstalled. The OS does seem to detect the printer, at least when it's on; I have turned it on, unplugged it, and plugged it back in and on at least one occasion it was automatically detected. The printer does work; I used an Ubuntu 8.04 live cd and printed a test page straight off the bat without any modifications. Using a Dell P4 2.8 Optiplex (don't quite remember the exact model number ... gotta reboot for that to see the initial screen. :) ) Any ideas? (No, I won't install Hardy Heron, even if it is LTS. :) ) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost my madwifi setup
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Getting closer, see below... Robert Moskowitz wrote: I rebuilt my notebook that has the atheros card in it, and forgot to save all of my setup to get it working. I am using dkms and the madwifi rpms from rpmforge. My modprobe.conf has a line: alias wifi0 ath_pci I can ifconfig wifi0 up But the command: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -dd -D madwifi -i wifi0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf I think I need a: ifconfig ath0 up And the wpa_supplicant line should be: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -B -dd -K -D madwifi -i ath0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf But this is still not working. I think there is something I need to do with wlanconfig? I used the directions on this page a couple of days ago: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless Once I did, I had the wireless working on atheros with wpa2 personal. Take care, Kurt Hansen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lost my madwifi setup
Kurt Hansen wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Getting closer, see below... Robert Moskowitz wrote: I rebuilt my notebook that has the atheros card in it, and forgot to save all of my setup to get it working. I am using dkms and the madwifi rpms from rpmforge. My modprobe.conf has a line: alias wifi0 ath_pci I can ifconfig wifi0 up But the command: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -dd -D madwifi -i wifi0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf I think I need a: ifconfig ath0 up And the wpa_supplicant line should be: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant -B -dd -K -D madwifi -i ath0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf But this is still not working. I think there is something I need to do with wlanconfig? I used the directions on this page a couple of days ago: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless Once I did, I had the wireless working on atheros with wpa2 personal. NetworkDirector just does not seem to work for me, or at least on the networks I am on. It might have to do in this case that there are over a dozen APs scanable with the SSID of IEEE. I have just NOT had success with NetworkDirector. I have read posts here that others have had similar problems. And over on the Gnome Network Manager list, there are lots of problems noted with the version we have for Centos, so we have to live with our short-comings. I made some progress but still do not have it all back together again. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problems with building an rpm
I followed the setup instructions from http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/ (link from the Centos wiki). All this is done on another 'clean' system, so I have to read the terminal screen there and tell what went wrong here. I then followed my colleague's instructions to get the tar, untar, autogen, configure, and finally make rpm. Well it was that make rpm command that finally failed. And sudo was the problem. I got a message something like: Assuming that you are in /etc/sudoers And then asked for a password. Which password? My userid or root's? I tried both and after 3 tries got: me is not in sudoers file. This incident will be reported. removing '/home/me/rpmbuild/BUILD/hipl--main--2.6/hipl-1.0.4' So I look at /etc/sudoers and do not understand what I am suppose to do there. A bit of help would be greatly appreciated! oh, and what is BEET support in the kernel? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problems with building an rpm
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well it was that make rpm command that finally failed. And sudo was the problem. I got a message something like: Assuming that you are in /etc/sudoers And then asked for a password. Which password? My userid or root's? I tried both and after 3 tries got: me is not in sudoers file. This incident will be reported. removing '/home/me/rpmbuild/BUILD/hipl--main--2.6/hipl-1.0.4' So I look at /etc/sudoers and do not understand what I am suppose to do there. A bit of help would be greatly appreciated! Here: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BecomingRoot#head-5a98c43bd135904d720095ff461d52aa7b51412d Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Evolution HTML
I've noticed several HTML emails that evo says are unknown attachments with a blank page on message display. Selecting Edit as New Message results in seeing the email in the composer. Anyone seeing this? CentOS 5.2. -- Bob Taylor ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
