Re: [CentOS-docs] revision numbers on translated articles
Marcus Moeller wrote: As the 'translation community' is growing I would like to suggest to add the 'revision number' of the original article on which the translation is based on, so someone else could easily diff to keep translations up to date. It would be great if translators add something like: 'translation based on #N' as footnote where N is the version of the original article. Good idea. Cheers, Ralph pgpvZ7fuX9tqW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] 답장: revision numbers on tra nslated articles
I also think that's good idea. Truly, YoungHoon Park --- 09/3/4 (수)에 Marcus Moeller m...@gcug.de님이 쓰신 메시지: 보낸 사람: Marcus Moeller m...@gcug.de 제목: [CentOS-docs] revision numbers on translated articles 받는 사람: Mail list for wiki articles CentOS-docs@centos.org 날짜: 2009년 3월 4일 (수요일) 오후 6:34 Good Evening. As the 'translation community' is growing I would like to suggest to add the 'revision number' of the original article on which the translation is based on, so someone else could easily diff to keep translations up to date. It would be great if translators add something like: 'translation based on #N' as footnote where N is the version of the original article. Best Regards Marcus ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs 180도 달라진 야후! 메일 - 여러 개의 메시지를 동시에 확인? 새로운 야후! 메일의 탭으로 가능해집니다. http://kr.content.mail.yahoo.com/cgland ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] revision numbers on translated articles
Marcus Moeller napsal(a): 'translation based on #N' as footnote where N is the version of the original article. Marcus, I like that idea. David ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0313 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 wireshark - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0313 wireshark security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0313.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.6-EL3.3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/wireshark-gnome-1.0.6-EL3.3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/wireshark-1.0.6-EL3.3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update wireshark\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpKvgWtrwplY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0313 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 wireshark - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0313 wireshark security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0313.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.6-EL3.3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/wireshark-gnome-1.0.6-EL3.3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/wireshark-1.0.6-EL3.3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update wireshark\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgp6KBXkwQzto.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor de correo postfix - dovecot
Primero, verifica que esten usando el mismo formato de fichero, por ejemplo, que le estes indicando al Postfix que te guarde los correos en Maildir, y le estes confugurando al Dovecot que te revise mbox. o tambien los directorios donde esten revisando, como planteas. Yoinier. El mar, 03-03-2009 a las 21:11 -0400, Carlos Alfonso escribió: Soy Nuevo en esto de linux y tengo un problema con la configuración de correo. Querría saber si alguno de ustedes me puede dar una pista. Instale un servidor Centos 5.2, con postfix, dovecot, webmin para administrar. Puedo enviar correos sin problemas, los correos entrantes puedo ver con webmin, en la opción de usuario o en la de postfix, pero no puedo estirar con Outlook o con otra herramienta, pese a que no me sale ningún error. Instale squirrelmail a ver si podía ver, pero tampoco me muestra ningún correo, sin embargo desde el webmin puedo leer sin problemas. Incluso puedo enviar desde Outlook y squirrelmail. No se si puede ser una tema de las carpetas donde están los correos o algo así. Agradecería cualquier pista que me puedan dar Saludos cordiales, Carlos Alfonso ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] postfix-mysql en rpm, usuarios virtuales
Hola listeros Tengo un CentOS 5.2 x86_64 en el cual voy a montar el servicio de correo para esto voy a usar postfix+dovecot. Ahora, lo que quiero es montar usuarios virtuales, para esto he encontrado varios manuales en howtoforge y otros muy buenos sites, pero en todos me dicen que tengo que recompilar postfix para que tenga soporte para MySQL, a la vez me encuentro manuales para Debian en los que se hace referencia a un paquete para Debian el cual se llama Postfix-mysql, con este paquete no hace falta recompilar el postfix sino que al instalarlo, este ya probee soporte para MySQL en Postfix. Mi preocupacion es la siguiente: yo quisiera evitar por todos los medios tener que recompilar postfix ya que soy totalmente novato en linux. Entonces les pregunto: Conoce alguno de ustedes si este paquete: postfix-mysql, existe en rpm para RH o CentOS??? Alguno de ustedes tiene experiencia en algun caso como el mio como para que me de una mano??? Desde ya gracias luisito ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] postfix-mysql en rpm, usuarios virtuales
El Wednesday 04 March 2009 19:34:36 luisito escribió: Hola listeros Tengo un CentOS 5.2 x86_64 en el cual voy a montar el servicio de correo para esto voy a usar postfix+dovecot. Ahora, lo que quiero es montar usuarios virtuales, para esto he encontrado varios manuales en howtoforge y otros muy buenos sites, pero en todos me dicen que tengo que recompilar postfix para que tenga soporte para MySQL, a la vez me encuentro manuales para Debian en los que se hace referencia a un paquete para Debian el cual se llama Postfix-mysql, con este paquete no hace falta recompilar el postfix sino que al instalarlo, este ya probee soporte para MySQL en Postfix. Mi preocupacion es la siguiente: yo quisiera evitar por todos los medios tener que recompilar postfix ya que soy totalmente novato en linux. Claro, el paquete oficial de RH no tiene soporte de mysql Entonces les pregunto: Conoce alguno de ustedes si este paquete: postfix-mysql, existe en rpm para RH o CentOS??? Si, activando los repos de centosplus. Eso se hace simplemente poniendo enable=1 al repo de centosplus en /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo Alguno de ustedes tiene experiencia en algun caso como el mio como para que me de una mano??? Instalando postfix desde centosplus, tienes tú problema solucionado, luego de esos puedes seguir leyendo la guia de howtoforge, la cual es bastante explicativa. Desde ya gracias luisito Saludos!! Atte. César Sepúlveda B. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Delimitar tamaño de Archivo Adjunto en el Correo
Estimados Tengo un servidor de correos en Centos 5 y lo que pasa que cuando ingreso al squirremail via web solo me permite adjuntar maximo 2 mB de tamaño de archivo por diferentes necesidades debo ampliarlo a 5MB. La pregunta es donde y como se hace. Espero que me puedan ayudar -- Saludos Richard Lazo Vigil ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Delimitar tamaño de Archivo Adjunto en el Correo
Saludos. La limitacion de 2MB es impuesta por PHP. En el archivo /etc/php.ini se encuentran las directivas que controlan tal comportamiento. Si mal no recuerdo en estos momentos las directivas relacionadas a tal comportamiento son upload_max_filesize y creo que tambien post_max_size. Prueba a cambiar una y luego la otra para ver si es una de ellas o ambas las que afectan a la ardilla. Hasta la proxima. Carlos. 2009/3/4 Richard Lazo rel...@gmail.com Estimados Tengo un servidor de correos en Centos 5 y lo que pasa que cuando ingreso al squirremail via web solo me permite adjuntar maximo 2 mB de tamaño de archivo por diferentes necesidades debo ampliarlo a 5MB. La pregunta es donde y como se hace. Espero que me puedan ayudar -- Saludos Richard Lazo Vigil ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] Errors using custom install disk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 (Sorry if this is a dupe. Sent originally from unregistered email address) All, I am trying to make a custom install CD for CentOS 5.2. I am building the iso in a VirtualBox image and testing the iso in another VirtualBox image so I don't keep wasting CD's. I have gotten to where all the package dependencies are met and now I get the following error on boot: An error occurred unmounting the CD. Please make sure you're not accessing /mnt/source from the shell on tty2 and then click OK to retry This scrolls rapidly up the screen (doing text install) and there is no OK button. I have seen that there is a bug about this dated 2006 at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206352 But that was closed in November 2007 so it SHOULD be fixed in the iso I am trying. I also read in a forum that the CD drive was going into some sort of sleep mode which the install couldn't overcome. The solution for this person was to Ctrl Alt F2 and in the new session do an ls on /mnt/sort every few seconds. Since this needs to be as unattended an install as possible, that wouldn't work even if I could get to the second console. Any ideas? Thanks, John -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmuQpcACgkQh55XlAYb/QjjgQCbBLsl31LK9OdB+cTR1iDCLSnU bS8AoJpbOW6s1vwMJsS9oSYzI+2hrcEj =GVZY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?
Hello, I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for multiple architectures are installed: yum install sqlite-devel Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * updates: centos.intergenia.de * addons: centos.intergenia.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de base 100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package sqlite-devel.x86_64 0:3.3.6-2 set to be updated --- Package sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.3.6-2 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Installing: sqlite-develx86_64 3.3.6-2 base 260 k sqlite-develi386 3.3.6-2 base 260 k Transaction Summary = Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 520 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): sqlite-devel-3.3.6 100% |=| 260 kB00:01 (2/2): sqlite-devel-3.3.6 100% |=| 260 kB00:01 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: sqlite-devel # [1/2] Installing: sqlite-devel # [2/2] Installed: sqlite-devel.x86_64 0:3.3.6-2 sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.3.6-2 Complete! Thats pretty annoying, because an rpm -qa | grep sqlite only shows the package name, not the arch: sqlite-3.3.6-2 sqlite-devel-3.3.6-2 sqlite-3.3.6-2 sqlite-devel-3.3.6-2 When I later want to remove rpms, I always have to mention both archs explicitly: rpm -e sqlite-3.3.6-2.i386 rpm -e sqlite-3.3.6-2.x64_86 And sometimes packages have arch i686 as well. Or I get an error: rpm -e sqlite error: sqlite specifies multiple packages First I thought, that this might be an issue due to 32bit compatibility. But then I remembered, that I used CentOS 4 on 64bit, too, and there was no such problem. How can I get rid of it? Kind regard Marten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Marten Lehmann lehm...@cnm.de wrote:
Hello,
I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for
multiple architectures are installed:
See, for example, for a solution:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=17812
Thats pretty annoying, because an rpm -qa | grep sqlite only shows the
package name, not the arch:
sqlite-3.3.6-2
sqlite-devel-3.3.6-2
sqlite-3.3.6-2
sqlite-devel-3.3.6-2
Try adding the following line to ~/.rpmmacros
%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
This way you can see the arch as well.
Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?
At Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:47:51 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hello, I noticed, that whenever I install a package on CentOS 5.x, rpms for multiple architectures are installed: This is normal for a 64-bit Intel/AMD flavored system. You have both the 64-bit libraries and the 32-bit libraries. You *probably* should not have the devel packages for both 32-bit and 64-bit, but I am not sure if that is a problem or not. yum install sqlite-devel Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * updates: centos.intergenia.de * addons: centos.intergenia.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de base 100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package sqlite-devel.x86_64 0:3.3.6-2 set to be updated --- Package sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.3.6-2 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Installing: sqlite-develx86_64 3.3.6-2 base 260 k sqlite-develi386 3.3.6-2 base 260 k Transaction Summary = Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 520 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): sqlite-devel-3.3.6 100% |=| 260 kB00:01 (2/2): sqlite-devel-3.3.6 100% |=| 260 kB00:01 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: sqlite-devel # [1/2] Installing: sqlite-devel # [2/2] Installed: sqlite-devel.x86_64 0:3.3.6-2 sqlite-devel.i386 0:3.3.6-2 Complete! Thats pretty annoying, because an rpm -qa | grep sqlite only shows the package name, not the arch: sqlite-3.3.6-2 sqlite-devel-3.3.6-2 sqlite-3.3.6-2 sqlite-devel-3.3.6-2 When I later want to remove rpms, I always have to mention both archs explicitly: rpm -e sqlite-3.3.6-2.i386 rpm -e sqlite-3.3.6-2.x64_86 And sometimes packages have arch i686 as well. You should not have both i686 and i386 packages for the same thing, but it is OK to have both i686 and x64_86 packages. Or I get an error: rpm -e sqlite error: sqlite specifies multiple packages First I thought, that this might be an issue due to 32bit compatibility. But then I remembered, that I used CentOS 4 on 64bit, too, and there was no such problem. How can I get rid of it? Kind regard Marten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need Broadcom 4311 firmware for CentOS 5
Robert Heller wrote: At Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:29:48 -0600 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Any hope of getting my laptop's Broadcom BCM94311 wireless running on CentOS 5? I find lots of references to using fwcutter to get the needed firmware from Windows drivers, but there's a Catch-22: [SNIP] I've been searching and fighting this for quite some time. I have a Fedora 10 installation that runs the wireless just fine on that laptop (Lenovo 3000 N200), but I really hate the churn and instability of Fedora. I was hoping that CentOS 5.3 might include a backported b43 driver, but I grabbed a preliminary version of the new kernel (2.6.18-132), and it still has the old bcm43xx.ko driver. If the wireless card is on a miniPCI card, it is possible to replace it with an Intel ipw2100 type card. Going to the Intel wireless means you can use the fully supported open drivers that come with the kernels and not have to message with dealing with MS-Windows drivers or closed source drivers. Those ipw2100 cards seem to be scarce as hen's teeth now, and the new IBM/Lenovo laptops are reported to be very picky about what wireless cards the BIOS will accept. I can get an Intel WM3945ABG card, one that should be compatible, quite cheaply. It appears that the iwlwifi driver in the new kernel supports that. I just need to see if I can find an equivalent for a Broadcom-specific tool that I find quite useful under Windows XP, and then I can go that way. Based on all the (much appreciated) info everyone has provided, I'm not going to further pursue getting CentOS 5.[23] to work with Broadcom wireless. -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410
Good Day! We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully on CentOS 4.5. This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will be solved in version 5.3? Sorry for my English ;( -- wbr - Maxim Odinintsev ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 32 or 64 bit (4 gb ram)
On 3-Mar-09, at 3:01 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 03.03.2009 um 23:57 schrieb Jerry Franz: Paul Hussein wrote: there still doesnt seem to be a 64bit java plugin You can use the 32bit plugin if you change the launcher script to launch the 32 bit version of firefox instead of the 64 bit version. Or konqueror, which somehow uses the java-binary to run applets. But I must admit, I rarely need it. But if you do a lot of work with blade-systems and their various remote-management facilities, one might want to have a stable java environment... Well in context to why I asked my original question, it was more for servers with no browser/X running So in my case, kind of a moot point. =-) d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410
on 3-4-2009 6:49 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following: Good Day! We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully on CentOS 4.5. This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will be solved in version 5.3? Sorry for my English ;( -- wbr - Maxim Odinintsev Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. The only part your English was bad on was the question about 5.2, but it wasn't too hard to figure out what you meant by the rest of the message. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410
Scott Silva wrote: Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. Hello Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to reinstall. Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which OS install on its, without any surprises ;) Thanks -- wbr - Maxim Odinintsev ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410
on 3-4-2009 8:25 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. Hello Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to reinstall. Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which OS install on its, without any surprises ;) Thanks -- wbr - Maxim Odinintsev You could try the live CD if you can bring the system out of production for a short time, like a maintenance window. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why are multiple architecture rpms installed?
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:47:51 +0100
Marten Lehmann wrote:
How can I get rid of it?
If all you need exists in x86_64, there is no need to use i386
packages.
You may try to uninstall all all non x86_64 and noarch packages (doing
test run first):
rpm -qa --qf %{NAME}.%{ARCH}\n | grep -v 'x86_64\|noarch\|gpg-pubkey' list
rpm --test -e $(cat list)
You can remove all i386 packages with this command:
yum remove \*.i?86
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and Adaptec AIC-9410
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Maxim Odinintsev gwynn@gmail.com wrote: Scott Silva wrote: Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long. Hello Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to reinstall. Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which OS install on its, without any surprises ;) Why go to 4.5 and not 4.7? Why try 5.0 and not the 5.2? Everything here sounds quite half-baked. Buying equipment for production before knowing if it is compatible. Rushing a deployment before it is even tested! If you have it working on 4.5 why do you want to go to 5.0 now? Why not wait until it is time for new hardware? -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 5.x SElinux issues
I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. I took the default selinux configuration. After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs. I let it go to do the updates and during that process I saw a large number of issues in the selinux troubleshooter. I also see these kinds of things in /var/log/messages: **Unmatched Entries** (Only first 10 out of 49031 are printed) audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: audit_lost=1 audit_rate_limit=0 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: backlog limit exceeded audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: audit_lost=2 audit_rate_limit=0 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: backlog limit exceeded . . . This makes me wonder if I've now got a corrupt system because of partial installs/upgrades on a number of packages ? Do I need to start over with a clean install again, and how do I avoid this problem the next time I try to run updates after the install? thanks, -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | (713)993-0671 ph. | and Integrated Interpretation | (713)993-0608 fax 633 1/2 W. 21st St.|Since 1992 | (713)306-5794 cell Houston, TX, 77008 | Chuck Campbell | campb...@accelinc.com | President Senior Geoscientist | Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Should I be worried?
When doing my updates, I got this message: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. 13.EL;49a Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing services without me touching it except to run a backup script and do a YUM update every week so. The result is that I have forgotten my Linux know how! Help! Todd -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.toddcary.com/aristephotography/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
The result is that I have forgotten my Linux know how! and your google know-how. I just googled it and got bucketloads of results. Maybe you should try that. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd 021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: When doing my updates, I got this message: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. 13.EL;49a Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing services without me touching it except to run a backup script and do a YUM update every week so. The result is that I have forgotten my Linux know how! Out of space? do a df and df -i on the file system and see if the space looks tight. If so, cleaning out some cruft might help. Also, if /boot is mounted read-only I guess that could cause it. Help! Todd snip sig stuff HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ext3 heavy file fragmentation with NFS write
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:31:01AM +0100, Andrzej Szymański wrote: Does anybody know how to avoid the file fragmentation when a file is created over NFSv3? A file created locally is OK: dd bs=32k if=/dev/zero of=test count=32x1024 conv=fsync filefrag test test: 10 extents found, perfection would be 9 extents When I create the file in the same dir, but from another machine, mounted over NFS: filefrag test test: 4833 extents found, perfection would be 9 extents With such a file a sequential read is quite slow (~76MB vs 200MB on my raid card). I can just suspect that this is a problem of block allocation when the same file is appended by different processes (8 NFS threads). I've tried mounting ext3 with -o reservation and switch to NFS over TCP, with no improvement. Both systems are Centos 5.2 with kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 The ext3 is mounted with rw,nosuid,nodev,usrquota,grpquota,acl NFS export: rw,sync,no_root_squash 8 NFS threads. Remotely mounted with options rw,intr,nfsvers=3,proto=udp,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 I would be very grateful for any help. Andrzej First watch out for comparing sparse files and real files. dd bs=32k if=/dev/zero of=test count=32x1024 conv=fsync Note that dev/zero combined with dd may be building a sparse file (or not) Sparse file block allocation is very different. I would build up a large file of binary data and dd it into test having been bitten by sparse file filesystem tricks. Also a local filesystem can have a very different free list than your NFS file system's underlying FS. You need to do the comparison on the exact same filesystem with the only difference being that one case is local and the other NFS. If I run your dd on my /tmp I get 18 extents while on /var/tmp I get 582 extents. Both are local to this system. So 18 local and 582 local tells me that you must test exactly the same FS with the only difference is that the creation was local .vs. NFS. All in all this is a don't care -- extents are not exactly equivalent to disk seeks and other disk I/O issues. Some of this can be improved only if you rebuild the file system. mkfs has a lot of flags and choices... You might also need to switch filesystems -- xfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, jfs, reiser... To some extent if you make an ideal local copy of a badly fragmented file you can improve the layout on disk/ filesystem. This should only be considered for very long lived very large files. Making a copy and comparing the original and copy with filefrag can tell you if this is worth doing. Backup and restore can help. As a filesystem gets full this will get worse and worse. If you are +60% full do not bother. -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new hat, now what? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Olivier Castien/Roncq/Infofrance/FRA/TZG est absent.
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 04/03/2009 de retour le 09/03/2009. Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez contacter l'équipe technique d'infofrance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.x SElinux issues
Chuck Campbell wrote: I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. I took the default selinux configuration. After that I ran yum update and found 600 plus updates and installs. That's a lot of updates. Do you really mean CentOS 5 rather than 5.2? I let it go to do the updates and during that process I saw a large number of issues in the selinux troubleshooter. I also see these kinds of things in /var/log/messages: **Unmatched Entries** (Only first 10 out of 49031 are printed) audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: audit_lost=1 audit_rate_limit=0 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: backlog limit exceeded audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: audit_lost=2 audit_rate_limit=0 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: backlog limit exceeded . . . This makes me wonder if I've now got a corrupt system because of partial installs/upgrades on a number of packages ? Do I need to start over with a clean install again, and how do I avoid this problem the next time I try to run updates after the install? Could try putting selinux in permissive mode, or disabling, before updating - then restoring to the more secure level; however, that should not be necessary. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2
on Centos 5.2 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus Has anyone gotten HPLIP 3.9.2 to work? If so what was done about python-dbus and PyQt4-dbus? They don't seem to included after installing PyQt4-4.4, sip 4.4.5, and hplip 3.9.2. thanks, roger wells -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
Bill - Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed, *but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them. Here is a sample: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310809 Mar 17 2008 initrd-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1296959 Mar 17 2008 initrd-2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310005 Dec 18 2007 initrd-2.6.9-67.EL.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1296326 Dec 18 2007 initrd-2.6.9-67.ELsmp.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 759989 Feb 3 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 776963 Feb 3 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.4.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 760171 Mar 15 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 777145 Mar 15 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 759989 Nov 16 2007 System.map-2.6.9-67.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 776963 Nov 16 2007 System.map-2.6.9-67.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1518757 Feb 3 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1458782 Feb 3 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.4.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1518936 Mar 15 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1459052 Mar 15 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1518693 Nov 16 2007 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1458902 Nov 16 2007 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.ELsmp I would assume that the older vmlinuz files can be removed as well as the other old files. Todd William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: When doing my updates, I got this message: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. 13.EL;49a Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing services without me touching it except to run a backup script and do a YUM update every week so. The result is that I have forgotten my Linux know how! Out of space? do a df and df -i on the file system and see if the space looks tight. If so, cleaning out some cruft might help. Also, if /boot is mounted read-only I guess that could cause it. Help! Todd snip sig stuff HTH -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.toddcary.com/aristephotography/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: Bill - Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed, *but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them. Here is a sample: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310809 Mar 17 2008 initrd-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1296959 Mar 17 2008 initrd-2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1310005 Dec 18 2007 initrd-2.6.9-67.EL.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1296326 Dec 18 2007 initrd-2.6.9-67.ELsmp.img -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 759989 Feb 3 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 776963 Feb 3 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.4.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 760171 Mar 15 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 777145 Mar 15 2008 System.map-2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 759989 Nov 16 2007 System.map-2.6.9-67.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 776963 Nov 16 2007 System.map-2.6.9-67.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1518757 Feb 3 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.4.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1458782 Feb 3 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.4.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1518936 Mar 15 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1459052 Mar 15 2008 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.0.7.ELsmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1518693 Nov 16 2007 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.EL -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1458902 Nov 16 2007 vmlinuz-2.6.9-67.ELsmp I would assume that the older vmlinuz files can be removed as well as the other old files. the proper way to handle the removal is via rpm rpm -e kernel-2.6.9-67.EL kernel-2.6.9-67.ELsmp Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:38:45 -0800 Todd Cary wrote: Thank you! My boot partition does not have any space available. Now there are what appears to be many files in there that are not needed, *but* with my sparse knowledge, I am reluctant to start erasing them. # yum install yum-utils # package-cleanup --oldkernels This will remove all but the most recent two kernels (and kernel-devel packages) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
Bill - I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how many to remove? Todd William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: When doing my updates, I got this message: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. 13.EL;49a Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing services without me touching it except to run a backup script and do a YUM update every week so. The result is that I have forgotten my Linux know how! Out of space? do a df and df -i on the file system and see if the space looks tight. If so, cleaning out some cruft might help. Also, if /boot is mounted read-only I guess that could cause it. Help! Todd snip sig stuff HTH -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.toddcary.com/aristephotography/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.x SElinux issues
Chuck Campbell wrote: I did a complete clean install of CentOS 5 from CD yesterday. If you really updated from 5.0 to 5.2 ... I took the default selinux configuratio **Unmatched Entries** (Only first 10 out of 49031 are printed) audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: audit_lost=1 audit_rate_limit=0 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: backlog limit exceeded audit: audit_backlog=262 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: audit_lost=2 audit_rate_limit=0 audit_backlog_limit=256 audit: backlog limit exceeded ... then please do a touch /.autorelabel and reboot - this will take some time, because SELinux will relabel your file system. Cheers, Ralph pgp1gOED7jgdv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
on 3-4-2009 2:48 PM Todd Cary spake the following: Bill - I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how many to remove? Todd William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:38 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: When doing my updates, I got this message: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /boot/System.map-2.6.9-78.0. 13.EL;49a Unfortunately, I installed Centos 4 about two years ago on my server that sits in the corner and does it's job of faithfully providing services without me touching it except to run a backup script and do a YUM update every week so. The result is that I have forgotten my Linux know how! Out of space? do a df and df -i on the file system and see if the space looks tight. If so, cleaning out some cruft might help. Also, if /boot is mounted read-only I guess that could cause it. Help! Todd snip sig stuff HTH -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 I would think that the current running kernel and the last should be enough. Maybe 3 for a short while after a kernel upgrade. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Should I be worried?
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 14:48 -0800, Todd Cary wrote: Bill - I did remove some of the older files (only a few) and there was then enough room to unpack the update. Is there some basic guideline on how many to remove? I suspect you have a minor mess-up in /etc/yum.conf (man yum.conf). IIRC, installonlypkgs (defaults to various kernel name variations) interacts with installonly_limit (default 3?). Somewhere, I can't recall where ATM, when the Xth version, specified by installonly_limit, is exceeded the oldest package version is automatically removed. However I seldom play with this stuff and haven't reviewed it in a long time so I'm unsure about this. I do know that the grub.conf (menu.lst) is automatically updated to remove the older versions. Maybe I'm confusing the two? Let's hope one of the folks that are current and more expert will chime in. Now, if you made the mistake I once made, this all breaks. I had a fall-back boot scheme set up that had a second disk bootable and a copy of root, /var, etc. on it to allow fast recovery (LVM snapshots were automatically created at various times to complete the process). I then set that backup boot disk's /root into my fstab and forgot to remove it after testing. Yum updates ran on it and never updated my primary root. Being (apparently) brain-dead I blithely copied stuff over never realizing what I was doing. Fortunately, the only real repercussion was when things got pretty full and I realized what I had done I received numerous bruises from self-flagellation with a locally available and wielded clue-bat! :-( As to your current clean-up effort, I think Craig mentioned the rpm method. That's what I would do. Just be careful that you double-check the version before you hit enter or you will not have enough clue-bats available to administer sufficient punitive lessons. Todd snip -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2
--- On Wed, 3/4/09, Roger Wells roger.k.we...@saic.com wrote: From: Roger Wells roger.k.we...@saic.com Subject: [CentOS] HPLIP 3.9.2 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2009, 1:26 PM on Centos 5.2 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus Has anyone gotten HPLIP 3.9.2 to work? If so what was done about python-dbus and PyQt4-dbus? They don't seem to included after installing PyQt4-4.4, sip 4.4.5, and hplip 3.9.2. Roger, I tried to build hplip-2.7.7-6 from fc8 on C5.2 (i386) The build works OK, but a test install fails #rpm -Uvh --test hplip hplip-gui hpijs a version of selinux-policy 3.03 is needed Seems that even 2.7.7-6 is too new for C5.2 -- Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] head scratcher update
perhaps my mind isn't working today. I'm trying to update a system that hasn't been updated in a while which I believe is CentOS 5.2 but it's possible that it's 5.1. I am pretty sure that it has php installed from CentOS-Extras and when I do yum update, it's stumbling on php -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-mysql Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-cli Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-xml Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-ldap Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-imap Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-mbstring Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-pdo So I queried rpm to see what's installed... # rpm -qa|grep php php-common-5.1.6-15.el5 php-mysql-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Net-Sieve-1.1.5-2.el5.centos php-mcrypt-5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 php-pear-MDB2-2.4.1-2.el5.centos php-cli-5.1.6-15.el5 php-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.2.10-1.el5.centos php-pear-Date-1.4.7-2.el5.centos php-pear-HTTP-Request-1.4.2-1.el5.centos php-pear-1.4.9-4 php-pear-Mail-Mime-1.4.0-1.el5.centos php-xml-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pecl-memcache-2.2.1-1.el5.centos php-pdo-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.8-1.el5.centos php-pear-Mail-1.1.14-1.el5.centos php-pear-Net-URL-1.0.15-1.el5.centos php-pear-File-1.2.2-1.el5.centos php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.4-3.el5.centos php-pear-DB-1.7.13-1.el5.centos php-ldap-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.2-4.el5.centos php-mbstring-5.1.6-15.el5 php-imap-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Log-1.9.13-1.el5.centos and I suppose I could yum remove php and reinstall but that seems rather drastic, plus, I have horde, etc setup too. Any suggestions? Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] head scratcher update
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:42 -0700, Craig White wrote: perhaps my mind isn't working today. I'm trying to update a system that hasn't been updated in a while which I believe is CentOS 5.2 but it's possible that it's 5.1. I am pretty sure that it has php installed from CentOS-Extras and when I do yum update, it's stumbling on php -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-mysql Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-cli Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-xml Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-ldap Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-imap Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-mbstring Error: Missing Dependency: php-common = 5.1.6-20.el5_2.1 is needed by package php-pdo So I queried rpm to see what's installed... # rpm -qa|grep php php-common-5.1.6-15.el5 php-mysql-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Net-Sieve-1.1.5-2.el5.centos php-mcrypt-5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1 php-pear-MDB2-2.4.1-2.el5.centos php-cli-5.1.6-15.el5 php-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Net-SMTP-1.2.10-1.el5.centos php-pear-Date-1.4.7-2.el5.centos php-pear-HTTP-Request-1.4.2-1.el5.centos php-pear-1.4.9-4 php-pear-Mail-Mime-1.4.0-1.el5.centos php-xml-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pecl-memcache-2.2.1-1.el5.centos php-pdo-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.8-1.el5.centos php-pear-Mail-1.1.14-1.el5.centos php-pear-Net-URL-1.0.15-1.el5.centos php-pear-File-1.2.2-1.el5.centos php-pecl-Fileinfo-1.0.4-3.el5.centos php-pear-DB-1.7.13-1.el5.centos php-ldap-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Auth-SASL-1.0.2-4.el5.centos php-mbstring-5.1.6-15.el5 php-imap-5.1.6-15.el5 php-pear-Log-1.9.13-1.el5.centos and I suppose I could yum remove php and reinstall but that seems rather drastic, plus, I have horde, etc setup too. Any suggestions? replying to myself here... apparently in checking packages one by one, php-mcrypt is required by the Horde packages but is not part of the upstream php packages and so it's an issue but there wasn't any warning about that. So removing it would dependencies should have allowed it to update but it still balked so I downloaded the various php packages from updates and did a yum localinstall which did indeed work and now I'm out a php-mcrypt package (probably not the most important thing anyway). yum update does seem to pass the initial test and it's presently downloading packages so I've got my fingers crossed. Obviously 'extras' is a far lower priority than getting out 5.3 Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] gnet-2.0, gio-2.0
I asked on Saturday and I didn't get reply. I'm trying again. I'm porting one project to centos where we use gnet and gio libraries. Will be these libraries part of centos in future? I'm not sure what relationship is between these libraries and glib. Regards Ondrej Filip ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
