Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 5.3 Release Notes Chinese translation

2009-03-27 Thread Timothy Lee
Dear Ralph,

I've also translated the Anaconda progress slides for the Artwork SIG.  
My trac username is again TimothyLee.  Can you give me permission to 
upload my Chinese translation files?  Thanks!

Regards,
Timothy Lee

On 03/24/2009 05:59 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 Timothy Lee wrote:

 Dear all,

 I would like to help translate the CentOS 5.3 Release Notes into
 Chinese.  Can you create the Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.3/Chinese page?
  
 You should be able to create that page yourself now. Xao: Are you still
 reading here? If so, can you do that together or at least talk to each
 other?


___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 5.3 Release Notes Chinese translation

2009-03-27 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Timothy Lee wrote:
 Dear Ralph,
 
 I've also translated the Anaconda progress slides for the Artwork SIG.  
 My trac username is again TimothyLee.  Can you give me permission to 
 upload my Chinese translation files?  Thanks!

I can do that, but you are a bit too late for that :)

Cheers,

Ralph


pgp9XLpNC8vmn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Home page access please

2009-03-27 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Ed Heron wrote:
 Please give me (EdHeron) access to my homepage.
 
 Assuming wiki pages are created the same way as a home page would be 
 created, I'd like to see how to create a page before I commit to creating a 
 wiki page.

Good idea. Done.

Cheers,

Ralph


pgp86F9DaP0se.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Home page access please

2009-03-27 Thread Mats Karlsson
On 3/27/09, Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de wrote:
 Ed Heron wrote:
   Please give me (EdHeron) access to my homepage.
  
   Assuming wiki pages are created the same way as a home page would be
   created, I'd like to see how to create a page before I commit to creating a
   wiki page.


 Good idea. Done.

  Cheers,


  Ralph

Ralph,

Can you give all Wiki users a homepage and access rights to it ?


Regards
Mats
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Home page access please

2009-03-27 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Mats Karlsson wrote:
 Ralph,
 
 Can you give all Wiki users a homepage and access rights to it ?

Not automatically (at least as far as I know). If you want one, just shout 
at me :)

Ralph

pgpS98z6q0uCp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Home page access please

2009-03-27 Thread Ed Heron
Ed Heron wrote:
 Please give me (EdHeron) access to my homepage.

 Assuming wiki pages are created the same way as a home page would be
 created, I'd like to see how to create a page before I commit to creating 
 a
 wiki page.

From: Ralph Angenendt
Good idea. Done.

Cheers,

Ralph

Thank you and  thank you.

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Request for wiki page

2009-03-27 Thread Phil Schaffner
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 RedShift wrote:
 The $rpm is explained in the text, I will replace it with a correct
 command in the wiki version. (You could easily assign $rpm to be rpm
 --target /target -i in your shell)
 
 Ah, I mistook that for a prompt, I just did a speedparse on the
 document. =:)

Rather nit-picky but if it were $RPM - caps for shell variables is a 
fairly well-established convention - it might be a bit easier to get.  I 
had the same problem at first glance.

Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] picture upload?

2009-03-27 Thread Ed Heron
How would I upload a picture?

Specifically for my homepage, but potentially for a wiki page?

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-virt] Backing up a running KVM guest

2009-03-27 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Julian Price wrote on Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:48:36 +:

 Are you syncing the disk image as one file via the host, or all the 
 files within via the guest?

The sync happens as if I had two physical machines. Phys backup logs in 
to Virt tobebackupped on Phys wherever and syncs Virt tobebackupped 
to the local storage (be that image, LVM partition or what).
I use it to backup to a backup mirror that can take over if the original 
fails. The complete sync usually takes only a few minutes per VM.
(I *could* add a sql flush and lock on the remote side in the custom 
script that is triggered by the ssh rsync login, but I would need to hold 
it for longer (during the complete database file sync) as creating a 
snapshot, of course.)

 If you are just syncing files in the guest (which I wouldn't protest 
 about) then the methods are not really comparable because the essential 
 point of my approach is that the whole bootable image is backed up, 
 which is desirable to some people for lots of reasons.

I'm not sure what you mean. I have two identical and working images 
after the sync (actually it's two LVM partitions). If I were using images 
I had two images after that. It's independant of the storage method for 
your LVM and you can use different storage on both sides. But is has to be 
created and formatted before you can use it for backup. For your method I 
think you just need to create the LVM partition (as large or larger than 
the source), no formatting. It's also possible that my method doesn't work 
for HVM guests where you may need a bootloader, I'm using only PV CentOS 5 
and 4 guests.



Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


[CentOS-es] Ayuda con Sun Grid Engine

2009-03-27 Thread Antonio Hernandez Benitez
Buen dia estoy haciendo unas pruebas montando un cluster con tres nodos, ya
pude levantar el master node y dos nodos, y los reconoce el SGE, los puedo
visulaizar pero ahora e querido agregar un nodo adicional con Windows XP,
alguien sabe como hacer, para que el master node lo reconosca, que servicios
deberia levantar en Windows, e mapiado en windows las carpetas donde esta el
home del master pero supongo que algo me falta hacer en windows por que el
centos ya incluso genere una llave y agregue el usuario y el host pero no
esta sincronizado con el martery windows alguien sabe algo al respecto.

De antemano les agradesco sus comentarios, Atte. Antonio Hernandez
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] [l-plug] Clonacion

2009-03-27 Thread Victor Ramirez
Hola

hay una utileria que viene en el disco live cd knoppix o la puedes encontrar
sola se llama gparted y esa te permite hacer clonacion de discos o solo de
particiones y no importa si el disco es de la misma marca o no solo que si
clona tal cual el disco si tiene errores se los lleva te recomiendo checar
tu disco primero con fsck y despues usar la herramienta.

Ademas puedes reducir o apliar el tamaño del disco si es que no lo tienes
lleno para que sea mas rapida la clonacion y despues volverlo al tamaño
original.


2009/3/26 Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com



 2009/3/26 carlos restrepo restrcar...@gmail.com

 Utiliza el comando dd  (man dd), los modelos de disco son irrelevantes, lo
 que debes tener presente es que el disco receptor sea igual o superior en
 espacio al que estas realizando la copia.
 Existen programas como Acronis que te permiten hacer ese proceso.

 Saludos.

 Carlos R!

 El 26 de marzo de 2009 16:54, Ken Salinas Rodriguez 
 ksali...@gruporocio.com escribió:

 Hola Comunidad:

 Una consulta, una vez escuche de que en LINUX existia una forma de copiar
 un
 disco duro entero, como el GHOST para WIN, alguien sabe cómo? Y
 necesariamente debe ser el mismo modelo de disco? Se puede con discos
 diferentes? alguien lo ha hecho?

 Salu2!

 Super Ken!

 El éxito consiste en obtener lo que se desea. La felicidad, en disfrutar
 lo
 que se obtiene


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




 --
 Carlos Restrepo M.

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 busca en google clonezilla.

 --
 It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

 Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
 servidas

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] 64bit Python 32bit c library ...

2009-03-27 Thread Mark Pryor



--- On Thu, 3/26/09, Ben abnormal...@clivepeeters.com.au wrote:

 From: Ben abnormal...@clivepeeters.com.au
 Subject: [CentOS] 64bit Python 32bit c library ...
 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 10:48 PM
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 I have a closed-source 32bit
 database application running on a 64bit 
 CentOS 5.2 system which is running very well however i am
 looking at 
 developing some python applications that require access to
 the data and 
 the vendor only provides a 32bit c library.
 
 So while attempting to utilize the library in python with
 ctypes it 
 became obvious that the 64bit python cannot use the 32bit c
 library.
 
 So what are my choices?
 

Yum and so many of the applets (system-config-*) are tied to Python that you 
can't mess with the base version or arch of Python.

What about a 32 bit chroot using Mock? I've never done it, but that's what Mock 
is intended to do.

Perl.i386 will run OK in x86_64 and there is a version of perl-Inline-CPP that 
will allow you to write most of what you want in CPP and wrap it with Perl.

-- 
Mark



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 64bit Python 32bit c library ...

2009-03-27 Thread Ben
Mark Pryor wrote:

 --- On Thu, 3/26/09, Ben abnormal...@clivepeeters.com.au wrote:

   
 From: Ben abnormal...@clivepeeters.com.au
 Subject: [CentOS] 64bit Python 32bit c library ...
 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 10:48 PM

 -Inline Attachment Follows-

 I have a closed-source 32bit
 database application running on a 64bit 
 CentOS 5.2 system which is running very well however i am
 looking at 
 developing some python applications that require access to
 the data and 
 the vendor only provides a 32bit c library.

 So while attempting to utilize the library in python with
 ctypes it 
 became obvious that the 64bit python cannot use the 32bit c
 library.

 So what are my choices?

 

 Yum and so many of the applets (system-config-*) are tied to Python that you 
 can't mess with the base version or arch of Python.

 What about a 32 bit chroot using Mock? I've never done it, but that's what 
 Mock is intended to do.

 Perl.i386 will run OK in x86_64 and there is a version of perl-Inline-CPP 
 that will allow you to write most of what you want in CPP and wrap it with 
 Perl.

   

I am afraid we are stuck with Python.  A considerable amount of the work 
has already been done but it has been developed on a 32bit system and it 
wasn't until early testing revealed our 64bit issue.  One of the primary 
objectives is to develop a SOAP interface to the application and that 
has also been started using TurboGears.

The vendor has offered to port the library to 64bit for a 5 figure amount.

Ben
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Welcome to the CentOS mailing list (Digest mode)

2009-03-27 Thread zhangrichard


 
 Subject: Welcome to the CentOS mailing list (Digest mode)
 From: centos-requ...@centos.org
 To: gzpowerch...@hotmail.com
 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:09:42 -0400
 
 Welcome to the CentOS@centos.org mailing list!
 
 To post to this list, send your email to:
 
 centos@centos.org
 
 General information about the mailing list is at:
 
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to
 or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your
 subscription page at:
 
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/options/centos/gzpowerchess%40hotmail.com
 
 
 You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to:
 
 centos-requ...@centos.org
 
 with the word `help' in the subject or body (don't include the
 quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions.
 
 You must know your password to change your options (including changing
 the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is:
 
 56180284
 
 Normally, Mailman will remind you of your centos.org mailing list
 passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you
 prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to
 unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on
 your options page that will email your current password to you.

_
上Windows Live 中国首页,下载最新版 MSN!
http://im.live.cn/___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Ray Van Dolson
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:50 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

Is there still no room for positive feedack and discussion from
developers and end users alike on how to approve things?

I've recently migrated a dozen or so RHEL3-machines to CentOS5 for our 
university linux course-farm. The machines are used by students as I write 
this. Students use them, and knowing prying students, CentOS still works like 
a charm and so does the molecular modeling software running off of CentOS.

The handful of new Intel i7-calculation machines we recently bought for our 
group of Ph. D.-Students are awesome and just hilariously fast with CentOS5.

I'm very happy with CentOS!

Good enough feedback? 8-}
-- 
/Sorin


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing openmpi lam for use with R

2009-03-27 Thread Kay Diederichs
Rick Bilonick schrieb:
 I am trying to install the R package Rmpi which needs libmpi. I've
 installed openmpi and lam in Centos 5.2:
 
 [r...@rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv openmpi
 openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5
 openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5
 [r...@rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv lam
 lam-7.1.2-14.el5
 lam-7.1.2-14.el5
 
 But I get the following error message when trying to install Rmpi:
 
 /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/lam/lib/libmpi.so when
 searching for -lmpi
 
 I'm not sure what else to install/uninstall to fix this.
 
 Rick B.

Your problem might be confusion about 32 versus 64 bit packages.

Let me guess - you're running a 64bit CentOS (this would explain why the 
packages are listed twice)?

To find out about 32/64bit packages it helps to have the following line 
in file /etc/rpm/macros:
%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}

Make sure to install the correct version (32 or 64bit) of Rmpi, and to 
tell Rmpi correctly where it should look for the mpi library.

HTH,

Kay

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] tar with -N option still picking up old files

2009-03-27 Thread John Doe

From: Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com
 On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
  Hello:
 
  I tried this command to tar up a set of data files
  updated since yesterday (The data directory contains
  multiple files with varying dates):
 
  /bin/tar -z -c -N 2009-03-25 -f /tmp/test.tgz data
 
  When I look at the content of the test.tgz file,
  it looks like it copied the content of the entire
  directory, not just the newer files.
 
  I am on CentOS 5.
 
 Try --newer-mtime instead of -N.  In my case (CentOS-4 backup
 machine), the -N option did not work as it's supposed to.  Not sure
 about tar on CentOS-5 though.

I like the distinction in the man page...

   -N, --after-date DATE, --newer DATE
  only store files newer than DATE

   --newer-mtime DATE
  like --newer, but with a DATE

Translation: --newer-mtime DATE is like --newer DATE, but with a DATE...  ^_^

JD


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] manage different profile with a laptop

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
Hi Rachid,

 I need to use different profile with some linux CentOS  laptops.

I'm managing such profiles with a custom init script.  The scripts 
checks what IP address (if any) the machine got and according to this 
address, I disable/enable some services (NIS, sendmail, automounter, 
local vs. remote homedirectories etc.).  It's not very elaborate but 
works fine until now.

Cheers

frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] tar with -N option still picking up old files

2009-03-27 Thread John Doe

 From: Akemi Yagi 
  On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
   Hello:
  
   I tried this command to tar up a set of data files
   updated since yesterday (The data directory contains
   multiple files with varying dates):
  
   /bin/tar -z -c -N 2009-03-25 -f /tmp/test.tgz data
  
   When I look at the content of the test.tgz file,
   it looks like it copied the content of the entire
   directory, not just the newer files.
  
   I am on CentOS 5.
  
  Try --newer-mtime instead of -N.  In my case (CentOS-4 backup
  machine), the -N option did not work as it's supposed to.  Not sure
  about tar on CentOS-5 though.

Forgot to add that I just tested -N, and it works for me (tar 1.15.1)...

JD


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] tar with -N option still picking up old files

2009-03-27 Thread Les Mikesell
John Doe wrote:
 From: Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com
 On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
 Hello:

 I tried this command to tar up a set of data files
 updated since yesterday (The data directory contains
 multiple files with varying dates):

 /bin/tar -z -c -N 2009-03-25 -f /tmp/test.tgz data

 When I look at the content of the test.tgz file,
 it looks like it copied the content of the entire
 directory, not just the newer files.

 I am on CentOS 5.
 Try --newer-mtime instead of -N.  In my case (CentOS-4 backup
 machine), the -N option did not work as it's supposed to.  Not sure
 about tar on CentOS-5 though.
 
 I like the distinction in the man page...
 
-N, --after-date DATE, --newer DATE
   only store files newer than DATE
 
--newer-mtime DATE
   like --newer, but with a DATE
 
 Translation: --newer-mtime DATE is like --newer DATE, but with a DATE...  ^_^

The difference is supposed to be that --newer-mtime uses mtime and the 
others use ctime for the file timestamp check.

But, there's an old saying that when the code and the documentation 
differ they are probably both wrong...

If you want finer-grained control you should use the 
--listed-incremental FILE option anyway.  If the file doesn't exist, you 
get a full run and the file is created containing a list of directories 
traversed.  If you specify an existing file, you get an incremental 
containing newer files plus everything under directories not listed from 
the previous run - and the file is re-written in place for a next-level 
incremental.  If you want multiple incrementals base from the full you 
have to save a copy of this file before each incremental for subsequent 
use.   This is the only way to catch older files in their new locations 
  under renamed directories - and it also triggers the mode that permits 
the restore option of deleting files that weren't present during the run 
(without it you can run out of space when restoring a series of 
incrementals).

---
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com



-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] USB, AutoMount VNC

2009-03-27 Thread Guy Boisvert
Hi!

I'm trying to figure out how to make automount do its job when nobody 
is logged at the console and the user access the server by VNC.  Does 
anybody knows how to make CentOS automount USB Hard Drives / Pendrive 
when accessed by VNC?


Thanks!



Guy Boisvert, ing
IngTegration inc.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] PXE-Kernel crashes with RAMDISK: incomplete write ... after modifiying initrd.img

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
John Doe wrote:
 Frank Thommen wrote:
 To modify the initrd.img, I took the original CentOS 5.2 image, unpacked 
 with cpio/gunzip and replaced modules/2.6.18-92.el5/x86_64/e1000e.ko 
 with a current version.  This driver module had been created on a 
 freshly installed CentOS 5.2 host with kernel 2.6.18-92.el5 and w/o any 
 updates.  After adding the driver, I re-archived and re-packed the image 
 and replaced the initrd.img on my tftp server.
  
 The new image is considerably bigger than the old one (12 MB vs. 5.7 MB) 
 which puzzles me, as the driver file itself is 2.8 MB (compared to the 
 old e1000e.ko with ca 170 KB) but the resulting modules.cgz is only 
 around 700 KB bigger than the original one.  All files have been 
 compressed with `gzip -9`.
 
 Just wondering... can you safely strip modules like you would strip 
 executables?

Unfortunately stripping didn't help.  Same error message at boot.


frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] lftp SSL_connect error

2009-03-27 Thread Sean Carolan
I am unable to find any documentation about this error message,
perhaps one of you has experienced this as well.  We have an FTP
server that is configured to accept FTP transactions over SSL.  The
server is working fine, as I am able to log in with lftp from my test
linux machine in the office.  None of our data center machines are
able to connect so perhaps this is a firewall or NAT issue?  Anyway
here is the very un-descriptive error message:

 SSL_connect: error::lib(0):func(0):reason(0)
 Closing control socket
`ls' at 0 [Delaying before reconnect: 18]

It just sits there trying to reconnect over and over again.  Any ideas?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] PXE-Kernel crashes with RAMDISK: incomplete write ... after modifiying initrd.img

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
Tru Huynh wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:27:10PM +0100, Frank Thommen wrote:
 What cpio options did you use to re-create modules/modules.cgz and then 
 the initrd.img?
 I used `cpio -ovF file` and `cpio -ov -H crc -F file` (I found the 
 latter on http://sial.org/howto/linux/initrd/).  However I could not 
 find any officially looking information about how the 
 initrd.img/modules.cgz is created.
 
 find ./ | cpio -H newc -o | | gzip -c9  /path/to/my/initrd.img


This give a slightly different error message:

[...]
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE.
VFS: Cannot open root device NULL or unknown-block(253,3)
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(253,3)


The two RAMDISK error lines have gone.  I have archived 
modules/modules.cgz *and* initrd.img with -H newc.


frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing openmpi lam for use with R

2009-03-27 Thread Tony Schreiner

On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Rick Bilonick wrote:

 I am trying to install the R package Rmpi which needs libmpi. I've
 installed openmpi and lam in Centos 5.2:

 [r...@rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv openmpi
 openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5
 openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5
 [r...@rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv lam
 lam-7.1.2-14.el5
 lam-7.1.2-14.el5

 But I get the following error message when trying to install Rmpi:

 /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/lam/lib/libmpi.so when
 searching for -lmpi

 I'm not sure what else to install/uninstall to fix this.

 Rick B.


Is Rmpi packaged somehow or are you getting it from CRAN?

The web site http://www.stats.uwo.ca/faculty/yu/Rmpi/ suggests it  
should work with either LAM-MPI or OpenMPI or even MPICH2

Have you installed the mpi-selector RPM and set it up? This will set  
up LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the selected MPI version. But I don't know if it  
will fix your issue.

Tony Schreiner
Boston College
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS VPN server for iPhone

2009-03-27 Thread Bowie Bailey
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
  The non-standard port is a good trick,
 
 Here's just an opinion: Security by obscurity only
 makes you feel good, it does nothing in reality.
 Anyone sufficiently talented to hack a service in
 order to gain root or do something useful would not
 be fooled by that. Set whatever your doing up right
 so that any false sense of security is not deemed
 necessary.

Changing port numbers will not stop a talented person who is intent on
breaking into your network.  However, it will stop (or at least slow
down) the script-kiddies, worms, and others out there who are just
scanning for misconfigured or unpatched applications.  Switching SSH to
a non-standard port completely emptied my log files of bad connection
attempts.  Now, if someone attempts to break in, it will be VERY obvious
in the logs where before, it would have been buried in all of the other
garbage.

 Prevent weak passwords, possibly use connection throttling
 etc etc.

Of course.  No one is suggesting that changing port numbers is all you
need to do.  It is just one more thing that you can do to slow down the
attackers.

-- 
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] PXE-Kernel crashes with RAMDISK: incomplete write ... after modifiying initrd.img

2009-03-27 Thread Tru Huynh
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:04:40PM +0100, Frank Thommen wrote:
 
 This give a slightly different error message:
 
 [...]
 md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
 md: autorun ...
 md: ... autorun DONE.
 VFS: Cannot open root device NULL or unknown-block(253,3)
 Please append a correct root= boot option
 Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
 unknown-block(253,3)
 
 
 The two RAMDISK error lines have gone.  I have archived 
 modules/modules.cgz *and* initrd.img with -H newc.
only the initrd needs -H newc

This one works for me
LABEL centos5
 MENU LABEL ^1) centos 5 x86_64 raid1 ks
 KERNEL centos5.x86_64/vmlinuz
APPEND initrd=centos5.x86_64/initrd.img 
method=http://10.0.0.4/pub/linux/c5/os/x86_64  noipv6 syslog=10.0.0.4 kssendmac 
ip=dhcp ks=http://10.0.0.4/ks/c5-raid1-64-min.cfg

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B


pgpJceM4PJl0V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] PXE-Kernel crashes with RAMDISK: incomplete write ... after modifiying initrd.img

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
Tru Huynh wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:04:40PM +0100, Frank Thommen wrote:
 This give a slightly different error message:

 [...]
 md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
 md: autorun ...
 md: ... autorun DONE.
 VFS: Cannot open root device NULL or unknown-block(253,3)
 Please append a correct root= boot option
 Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
 unknown-block(253,3)


 The two RAMDISK error lines have gone.  I have archived 
 modules/modules.cgz *and* initrd.img with -H newc.
 only the initrd needs -H newc

I tried also with non-newc for modules.cgz but this doesn't help. 
However when I look at the original, gunzipped modules.cgz wich `file`, 
then I get ASCII cpio archive (SVR4 with no CRC) which would also be 
'newc'.


 This one works for me
 LABEL centos5
  MENU LABEL ^1) centos 5 x86_64 raid1 ks
  KERNEL centos5.x86_64/vmlinuz
 APPEND initrd=centos5.x86_64/initrd.img 
 method=http://10.0.0.4/pub/linux/c5/os/x86_64  noipv6 syslog=10.0.0.4 
 kssendmac ip=dhcp ks=http://10.0.0.4/ks/c5-raid1-64-min.cfg


That is more or less what we have:

   KERNEL CentOS-5.2_64/vmlinuz
   APPEND initrd=CentOS-5.2_64/initrd.img ramdisk_size=5940 kssendmac
ks=http://srv/ks/ks.cgi noipv6


This should not be the problem as it works fine for the unmodified 
initrd.img.


frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Server Hang

2009-03-27 Thread Care India
I have Cent OS 5.1

I also have http://phpsysinfo.sourceforge.net/

I have asterisk running .

Now when I look at System Information ,

I see that Physical Memory keep increasing and at one point it reaches
96%. Then my sever get hang and then I have to restart it.

I have 4 GB RAM.

Processors 2
Model Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7200 @ 2.53GHz
CPU Speed 2.53 GHz
Cache Size 3.00 MB
System Bogomips 10135.71

Kernel Version 2.6.18-53.el5 (SMP)
Distro Name CentOS release 5 (Final)
Load Averages 0.27 0.35 0.31

What could be the reason ?


ps ax shows :




PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
1 ? Ss 0:00 init [3]
2 ? S 0:00 [migration/0]
3 ? SN 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]
4 ? S 0:00 [watchdog/0]
5 ? S 0:00 [migration/1]
6 ? SN 0:00 [ksoftirqd/1]
7 ? S 0:00 [watchdog/1]
8 ? S 0:00 [events/0]
9 ? S 0:00 [events/1]
10 ? S 0:00 [khelper]
11 ? S 0:00 [kthread]
15 ? R 0:00 [kblockd/0]
16 ? S 0:00 [kblockd/1]
17 ? S 0:00 [kacpid]
109 ? S 0:00 [cqueue/0]
110 ? S 0:00 [cqueue/1]
113 ? S 0:00 [khubd]
115 ? S 0:00 [kseriod]
182 ? S 0:00 [pdflush]
183 ? S 0:00 [pdflush]
184 ? S 0:00 [kswapd0]
185 ? S 0:00 [aio/0]
186 ? S 0:00 [aio/1]
338 ? S 0:00 [kpsmoused]
370 ? S 0:00 [ata/0]
371 ? S 0:00 [ata/1]
372 ? S 0:00 [ata_aux]
376 ? S 0:00 [scsi_eh_0]
377 ? S 0:00 [scsi_eh_1]
378 ? D 0:00 [kjournald]
405 ? S 0:00 [kauditd]
439 ? Ss 0:00 /sbin/udevd -d
1374 ? S 0:00 [kmpathd/0]
1375 ? S 0:00 [kmpathd/1]
1405 ? S 0:00 [kjournald]
1967 ? Ss 0:00 syslogd -m 0
1970 ? Ss 0:00 klogd -x
2021 ? Ss 0:00 portmap
2046 ? Ss 0:00 rpc.statd
2062 ? Ss 0:00 dbus-daemon --system
2103 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/acpid
2130 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd
2219 ? S 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/mysqld_safe --defaults-file=/etc/my.
2255 ? Sl 0:01 /usr/libexec/mysqld --defaults-file=/etc/my.cnf --bas
2294 ? Ss 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections
2302 ? Ss 0:00 sendmail: Queue run...@01:00:00 for /var/spool/client
2320 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2335 ? Ss 0:00 crond
2364 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/atd
2379 ? Ss 0:00 hald
2380 ? S 0:00 hald-runner
2387 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2388 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2389 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2390 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2391 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2392 ? S 0:00 hald-addon-acpi: listening on acpid socket /var/run/a
2393 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2394 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2396 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd
2397 ? S 0:00 /usr/libexec/hald-addon-cpufreq
2402 ? S 0:00 hald-addon-keyboard: listening on /dev/input/event0
2630 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/vsftpd /etc/vsftpd/vsftpd.conf
2746 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -L -d -m -S asterisk /usr/sbin/asteri
2747 pts/0 Ssl+ 0:01 /usr/sbin/asterisk -vgc
2801 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTupdate /usr/share/astguic
2803 pts/1 Ss+ 0:01 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_update.pl
2804 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTsend /usr/share/astguicli
2805 pts/2 Ss+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_manager_sen
2807 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTlisten /usr/share/astguic
2808 pts/3 Ss+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_manager_lis
2810 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTVDauto /usr/share/astguic
2811 pts/4 Ss+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_VDauto_dial
2813 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTVDremote /usr/share/astgu
2815 pts/5 Ss+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_VDremote_ag
2816 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTVDadapt /usr/share/astgui
2818 pts/6 Ss+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_VDadapt.pl
2819 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/SCREEN -d -m -S ASTfastlog /usr/share/astgui
2820 pts/7 Ss+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/FastAGI_log.pl
2828 ? S 0:00 ip_relay 40569 127.0.0.1 4569 999
2829 ? S 0:00 ip_relay 41569 127.0.0.1 4569 999
2836 pts/7 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/FastAGI_log.pl
2837 pts/7 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/FastAGI_log.pl
2838 pts/7 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/FastAGI_log.pl
2839 pts/7 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/FastAGI_log.pl
2840 pts/7 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/FastAGI_log.pl
2869 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/smartd -q never
2875 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/libexec/webmin/miniserv.pl /etc/we
2880 tty1 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty1
2883 tty2 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty2
2884 tty3 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty3
2885 tty4 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty4
2886 tty5 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty5
2887 tty6 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/mingetty tty6
3040 ? S 0:00 crond
3047 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_CRON_audio_
3072 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/sendmail -FCronDaemon -i -odi -oem -oi -t
3191 ? S 0:00 crond
3199 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_CRON_audio_
3212 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/sendmail -FCronDaemon -i -odi -oem -oi -t
3699 ? S 0:00 crond
3705 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_CRON_audio_
3718 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/sendmail -FCronDaemon -i -odi -oem -oi -t
4090 ? S 0:00 crond
4096 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/share/astguiclient/AST_CRON_audio_
4112 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/sendmail 

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 49, Issue 11

2009-03-27 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2009:0362 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 NetworkManager -
  security update (Pasi Pirhonen)
   2. CESA-2009:0295 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 net-snmp -  security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)
   3. CESA-2009:0373 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 systemtap - security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)
   4. CESA-2009:0295 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 net-snmp -  security
  update (Tru Huynh)
   5. CESA-2009:0295 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 net-snmp  - security
  update (Tru Huynh)
   6. CESA-2009:0373 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x)  systemtap - security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)
   7. CESA-2009:0295 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) net-snmp - security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:13:41 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0362 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64
NetworkManager - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090326171340.ga1...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0362

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0362.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/NetworkManager-0.3.1-5.el4.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/NetworkManager-gnome-0.3.1-5.el4.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090326/a63f7199/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:15:08 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0295 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64
net-snmp -  security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090326171508.gb1...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0295

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0295.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.27.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/net-snmp-devel-5.0.9-2.30E.27.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/net-snmp-libs-5.0.9-2.30E.27.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/net-snmp-perl-5.0.9-2.30E.27.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/net-snmp-utils-5.0.9-2.30E.27.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090326/d5ca9c44/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:22:34 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0373 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64
systemtap - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090326172234.gc1...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0373

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0373.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/systemtap-0.6.2-2.c4.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/systemtap-runtime-0.6.2-2.c4.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/systemtap-testsuite-0.6.2-2.c4.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090326/1edf1bc0/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:34:06 +0100
From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0295 Moderate CentOS 3 i386
net-snmp -  security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090326173406.ga4...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0295

net-snmp security update for CentOS 3 i386:

Re: [CentOS] Server Hang

2009-03-27 Thread Care India
[root@ ~]# top

top - 13:15:25 up  1:02,  1 user,  load average: 11.31, 7.18, 4.85
Tasks: 247 total,   1 running, 246 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  7.0%us,  3.5%sy,  0.0%ni, 26.6%id, 61.7%wa,  0.2%hi,  1.0%si,
 0.0%st
Mem:   3358140k total,  2270176k used,  1087964k free,   108332k buffers
Swap:   779144k total,0k used,   779144k free,  1475812k cached

  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 2254 mysql 15   0  173m  32m 3964 S1  1.0   0:45.16 mysqld
12486 root  16   0 24776  18m 2620 S0  0.6   0:00.59 AST_CRON_audio_
13211 root  18   0 24780  18m 2596 S0  0.6   0:00.29 AST_CRON_audio_
24715 root  15   0 24776  18m 2596 S0  0.6   0:00.72 AST_CRON_audio_
 2969 root  18   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:02.27 AST_CRON_audio_
14987 root  15   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:00.92 AST_CRON_audio_
24392 root  15   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.51 AST_CRON_audio_
 4052 root  18   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.92 AST_CRON_audio_
11946 root  15   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.80 AST_CRON_audio_
12338 root  16   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.19 AST_CRON_audio_
23503 root  16   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:00.46 AST_CRON_audio_
28702 root  15   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.15 AST_CRON_audio_
30800 root  15   0 24780  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.48 AST_CRON_audio_
 1878 root  16   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:00.37 AST_CRON_audio_
 2148 root  15   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:00.63 AST_CRON_audio_
 5039 root  17   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.30 AST_CRON_audio_
 5375 root  15   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:00.94 AST_CRON_audio_
 6002 root  18   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.92 AST_CRON_audio_
 8677 root  16   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.83 AST_CRON_audio_
16009 root  16   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.66 AST_CRON_audio_
20088 root  16   0 24776  18m 2600 S0  0.6   0:01.10 AST_CRON_audio_
25039 root  17   0 24780  18m 2592 S0  0.6   0:00.20 AST_CRON_audio_
 2680 root  15   0 32048  11m 4904 S1  0.4   1:08.59 asterisk
18078 apache15   0 61224  11m 7612 S0  0.4   0:01.37 httpd
18622 apache15   0 61224  11m 7212 S0  0.3   0:01.21 httpd
 2390 apache25   0 61232  10m 6928 S0  0.3   0:02.28 httpd
18612 apache15   0 61108  10m 6840 S0  0.3   0:01.13 httpd
18631 apache15   0 61224  10m 6724 S0  0.3   0:01.47 httpd
 2392 apache16   0 61236  10m 6696 S0  0.3   0:02.08 httpd
19151 apache25   0 61224  10m 6656 S0  0.3   0:01.38 httpd
19175 apache15   0 61232  10m 6592 S0  0.3   0:01.14 httpd
 2391 apache15   0 61232  10m 6508 S0  0.3   0:01.92 httpd
17499 apache15   0 61224  10m 6464 S0  0.3   0:01.52 httpd
18625 apache15   0 61108  10m 6504 S0  0.3   0:01.16 httpd
 2387 apache15   0 61236   9m 5912 S0  0.3   0:02.47 httpd
 2394 apache16   0 61240 9.9m 5896 S0  0.3   0:02.19 httpd
17500 apache15   0 61224 9.8m 5752 S0  0.3   0:01.64 httpd
19155 apache16   0 61252 9.8m 5760 S0  0.3   0:01.10 httpd
18076 apache15   0 61224 9.8m 5748 S0  0.3   0:01.28 httpd





On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:28 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:


 From: Care India care.india.supp...@gmail.com
  I see that Physical Memory keep increasing and at one point it reaches
 96%. Then my sever get hang and then I have to restart it.
  I have 4 GB RAM.
  What could be the reason ?

 Try 'top' and press 'M' to see the processes using the most RAM.

 JD




 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Server Hang

2009-03-27 Thread John Doe

From: Care India care.india.supp...@gmail.com
 I see that Physical Memory keep increasing and at one point it reaches 96%. 
 Then my sever get hang and then I have to restart it.
 I have 4 GB RAM.
 What could be the reason ?

Try 'top' and press 'M' to see the processes using the most RAM.

JD


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Les Mikesell
Rainer Duffner wrote:
 Spiro Harvey schrieb:
 I've got a couple of cents change here...

   
 
 
 While I do think some of the wording of the post that the above post was
 replying to was a bit mis-chosen, I like to believe it had a positive spin.
 (In that it didn't want to put blame on anybody)
 
 I *do* agree with the sentiment that people should buy RHEL for stuff
 they consider critical.
 Or just change distro if they think they get a better deal elsewhere.
 
 Which is what I normaly do, unless management decides they can get away
 cheaper and in essence get RHEL + updates for free with CentOS.
 
 The CentOS team certainly doesn't owe me CentOS 5.3 by now - in the same
 way I can't really complain about a late (again) FreeBSD release.

While I love CentOS, think the team does the best possible job, and 
appreciate the work they put into undoing the restrictions on 
redistribution by the upstream distro, I have to wonder if it isn't time 
to just switch to a base distribution that doesn't impose those 
restrictions that force the extra work and delays in the first place.

Is there still any reason other than having to learn to type 'apt-get' 
instead of 'yum' to prefer Centos over Ubuntu?  I think for me it is 
just that I started with RH before they imposed the redistribution 
restriction nonsense and have been too lazy to change administration 
styles (and debian's release-when-it's-ready schedule wasn't 
attractive at the time).  On a test machine I've noted that Ubuntu 
worked with the wireless adapter where Centos didn't, Sun Java is 
included, and the update mechanism seems faster and better suited to 
caching proxies.  But it still feels slightly weird and unfamiliar.  Are 
there reasons to not trust it?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread nate
Les Mikesell wrote:

 Is there still any reason other than having to learn to type 'apt-get'
 instead of 'yum' to prefer Centos over Ubuntu?  I think for me it is
 just that I started with RH before they imposed the redistribution
 restriction nonsense and have been too lazy to change administration
 styles (and debian's release-when-it's-ready schedule wasn't
 attractive at the time).  On a test machine I've noted that Ubuntu
 worked with the wireless adapter where Centos didn't, Sun Java is
 included, and the update mechanism seems faster and better suited to
 caching proxies.  But it still feels slightly weird and unfamiliar.  Are
 there reasons to not trust it?

I think it's safe to assume that the majority of CentOS users out
there run CentOS on servers, not on desktops/laptops/etc.

I have been using Debian for 11 years(since hamm), and use it
on all of my personal desktops. I have used Ubuntu on my
laptops. With Debian 5.0 coming out recently I may make my
next laptop run that. I haven't had a need to use a laptop
on a regular basis in over a year now so my laptops are
collecting dust for the most part(still use it for travel
when I travel).

I know there are some, but I am not one that uses CentOS(or RHEL)
on a desktop system. CentOS/RHEL make great server systems for
many types of servers(I prefer debian on my personal gear because
of the larger, supported package repositories). My work gear
is much larger scale so I put together manually package dependencies
and special versions of some packages to distribute across tens
or hundreds of systems as-needed. My personal server doesn't need
such attention or else I might use CentOS there too.

I have no problem myself in CentOS being weeks/months behind
RHEL. I still have legacy systems running RHEL 3 Update 3. And
they are not going to get updated, just re-installed from scratch
when I have time to get to them.

All of the systems I manage are fairly well protected and generally
only have trusted users that interact with them, internet-facing
services are entirely 3rd party packages(e.g. java+tomcat), maintained
independently of the OS, so security risks are very low. I'm
still going through the list of older RHEL 4 Update 4 systems
and getting them re-installed with something newer, at this rate
maybe another 3-4 months, at which point it may be time to be able
to widely deploy CentOS 5. The main reason for going back and
updating things isn't because the OS is old it's more because
the management and configuration on those older systems is so
broken the only way to fix them safely is to re-install.

If you want another distribution, go to another distribution, I
can't imagine why CentOS would want to base themselves on Ubuntu
when you can already get Ubuntu pretty easily for free.

CentOS/RHEL have their places they provide a valuable service to
the world. As far as I know our F5 load balancers are based on
CentOS(they were as of a few years ago, I'm not sure if F5 has
changed their distribution since, I suspect not, is based on
RHEL-3), and our recently purchased high performance Exanet
NAS cluster runs on CentOS 4.4. While my back end storage
array from 3PAR runs on Debian.

Not everyone needs the latest  greatest, not everyone needs
the most current security updates. Make your own risk assessments
based on your environment and use what makes you feel comfortable
to sleep at night.

I don't see a need for CentOS to change a thing, hopefully they
can get more support if they need it, I try to help as best I can
on the list answering other's questions.

nate


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:34:04PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
 Rainer Duffner wrote:
  Spiro Harvey schrieb:
  I've got a couple of cents change here...
 

  While I do think some of the wording of the post that the above post was
  replying to was a bit mis-chosen, I like to believe it had a positive spin.
  (In that it didn't want to put blame on anybody)
  
  I *do* agree with the sentiment that people should buy RHEL for stuff
  they consider critical.
  Or just change distro if they think they get a better deal elsewhere.
  
  Which is what I normaly do, unless management decides they can get away
  cheaper and in essence get RHEL + updates for free with CentOS.
  
  The CentOS team certainly doesn't owe me CentOS 5.3 by now - in the same
  way I can't really complain about a late (again) FreeBSD release.
 
 While I love CentOS, think the team does the best possible job, and 
 appreciate the work they put into undoing the restrictions on 
 redistribution by the upstream distro, I have to wonder if it isn't time 
 to just switch to a base distribution that doesn't impose those 
 restrictions that force the extra work and delays in the first place.
 
 Is there still any reason other than having to learn to type 'apt-get' 
 instead of 'yum' to prefer Centos over Ubuntu?  I think for me it is 
 just that I started with RH before they imposed the redistribution 
 restriction nonsense and have been too lazy to change administration 
 styles (and debian's release-when-it's-ready schedule wasn't 
 attractive at the time).  On a test machine I've noted that Ubuntu 
 worked with the wireless adapter where Centos didn't, Sun Java is 
 included, and the update mechanism seems faster and better suited to 
 caching proxies.  But it still feels slightly weird and unfamiliar.  Are 
 there reasons to not trust it?
 

Oh boy.  Now we're going in a completely new direction on this thread.
:-D

Nothing wrong with changing distros of course, but, at least for me my
reasons for staying with RH/Fedora/Cent are mainly that RHEL is still
the corporate standard and more likely to keep me employed.  I'd
prefer to stay familiar with the RH environment for this reason
alone.

As long as RH continues to employ a large chunk of the Linux
development community, it will continue to be a major player in the
enterprise space.  And if not for CentOS someone else would step up and
fill the void of a free version.

Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Les Mikesell
Timothy Murphy wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
 
 While I love CentOS, think the team does the best possible job, and 
 appreciate the work they put into undoing the restrictions on 
 redistribution by the upstream distro, I have to wonder if it isn't time 
 to just switch to a base distribution that doesn't impose those 
 restrictions that force the extra work and delays in the first place.
 
 What restrictions are you talking about exactly?

The ones that require the work that the CentOS team does to 
rebuild/rebrand/repackage before redistribution is permitted.  This was 
not required in the early days when RH developed its community support 
(up through RH9) and perhaps it would have been wiser to walk away from 
everything RedHat-related the day they made that change.  There just 
didn't seem to be a suitable alternative until Ubuntu started the 
long-term support releases.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB, AutoMount VNC

2009-03-27 Thread MHR
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Guy Boisvert boisvert@videotron.ca wrote:
 Hi!

        I'm trying to figure out how to make automount do its job when nobody
 is logged at the console and the user access the server by VNC.  Does
 anybody knows how to make CentOS automount USB Hard Drives / Pendrive
 when accessed by VNC?


Could you describe the problem a little more clearly?  Separation of
console from USB-accessible hardware, how VNC fits in in this
scenario, etc.

It sounds like someone wants to log in remotely (VNC), plug in a
(local) USB device and access it (remotely), which doesn't make sense
to me.

Thanks.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB, AutoMount VNC

2009-03-27 Thread Guy Boisvert
MHR wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Guy Boisvert boisvert@videotron.ca 
 wrote:
 Hi!

I'm trying to figure out how to make automount do its job when nobody
 is logged at the console and the user access the server by VNC.  Does
 anybody knows how to make CentOS automount USB Hard Drives / Pendrive
 when accessed by VNC?

 
 Could you describe the problem a little more clearly?  Separation of
 console from USB-accessible hardware, how VNC fits in in this
 scenario, etc.
 
 It sounds like someone wants to log in remotely (VNC), plug in a
 (local) USB device and access it (remotely), which doesn't make sense
 to me.
 
 Thanks.
 
 mhr
 ___

Hi,

It make senses if you're running a box headless (it will be headless 
soon, now i'm testing it with K+V+M attached).  We're using a CentOS box 
to plug USB Flash drive  external hard drive into it.  The CentOS box 
is then used to FTP the content of these external drives to a Winblows 
box, all that filtered by a firewall between the 2 boxes.  Only FTP is 
allowed.

Doing some tests on the CentOS box, i saw that if i log into the 
console, then the local session and the remote VNC sessions will see the 
drives automounted.  If i log out of the console, then the VNC session 
won't see anything.  It's like the automount works only if somebody is 
logged at the console.

Hope i was clearer.  Thanks!


Guy Boisvert, ing.
IngTegration inc.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Timothy Murphy
Les Mikesell wrote:

 While I love CentOS, think the team does the best possible job, and 
 appreciate the work they put into undoing the restrictions on 
 redistribution by the upstream distro, I have to wonder if it isn't time 
 to just switch to a base distribution that doesn't impose those 
 restrictions that force the extra work and delays in the first place.

What restrictions are you talking about exactly?

Personally, I run Centos on my server
because it doesn't change too rapidly,
and this makes me think it can be trusted
not to cause me too much trouble.

I don't mind taking that trouble on my laptops,
where I run Fedora-10.


-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-27 Thread Michael Peterson
JohnS wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:15 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
   
 JohnS wrote:
 
 On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:

   
   
 I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if 
 there is a work around.
 
 
 ---
 What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your
 are using to install? How old is the cable? Last thing strip it down to
 the bare minimum harwdare and install?

 JohnStanley
   

   
   
   
 I burned the CD images on Windows using Roxio and an AOpen DVD Read/ 
 CDRW drive.

 The burned CD's test fine in more than one system.
 I do have to test them with ide=nodma to get them to pass.

 The CD Drive and IDE Cable on the system I am trying to install is 5 
 years old.

 I searched the CentOS site and mailing list for similar issues and found 
 one dating back to last year.
 The anaconda errors were similar.

 I finally got 5.2 to install and the fix was to tell the kernel to 
 ignore the ide tape device.
 The tape drive is on hdd and the following allowed me to do a GUI 
 install with 512 MB.

 linux ide=nodma hdd=none
 

 Just currious does the tape drive work since install? Would like like to
 know the brand of it also for reference.

   
 I thought I would post my result so that this request for help could be 
 closed.

 Thanks for having this list to provide the avenue to a solution.
 

 JohnStanley

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
   

I have used mt and cpio to access the tape drive with and they work fine.

The tape drive is an ECRIX VXA-1a ATAPI TAPE drive.





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Morten Torstensen
Les Mikesell wrote:
 The ones that require the work that the CentOS team does to 
 rebuild/rebrand/repackage before redistribution is permitted.  This was 

As a corporation Red Hat HAD to do that, even if IANAL. CentOS as a 
model works just fine. Sure, sometimes there can be a lack of manpower 
for something. After all, it is a volunteer project that people run in 
their spare time!

Of course, the geek in me waits for the next release. It is always 
waiting for the next release and the next new toy. If I really NEEDED 
the next release, I would use RHEL.

Come on folks, get a perspective of what we are doing here.

-- 

//Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Getting asciidoc

2009-03-27 Thread James B. Byrne
I need to install asciidoc on my build machine.  There is a version
for CentOS-5 available at dags rpm site.  I have a repository
configured for dag like so:

[dag]
name=Dag Wieers RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
#Also see URL http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/
baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el$releasever/en/$basearch/dag
gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
gpgcheck=1
# this repo just does not respond in a timely fashion so
# turned off by default
# Use yum --enablerepo=dag to use.
enabled=0
gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
includepkgs=acsiidoc* bitt* perl*
# priority requires yum-priorities. Must also be enabled in
# yum.conf and /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf
priority=20

I tried to install asciidoc using yum like so:

# yum --enablerepo=dag install asciidoc
Loading fastestmirror plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * epel: www.muug.mb.ca
 * adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com
 * dag: apt.sw.be
 * base: mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
 * updates: www.muug.mb.ca
 * addons: www.muug.mb.ca
 * extras: www.muug.mb.ca
Reducing Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 5 - x86_64 to included
packages only
Finished
Reducing Dag Wieers RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux to
included packages only
Finished
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package asciidoc available.
Nothing to do

What am I doing wrong?


-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting asciidoc

2009-03-27 Thread Brian Mathis
You need to set enabled=1 in the config file.  Currently you have enabled=0


On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:20 PM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
 I need to install asciidoc on my build machine.  There is a version
 for CentOS-5 available at dags rpm site.  I have a repository
 configured for dag like so:

 [dag]
 name=Dag Wieers RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
 #Also see URL http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/
 baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el$releasever/en/$basearch/dag
 gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
 gpgcheck=1
 # this repo just does not respond in a timely fashion so
 # turned off by default
 # Use yum --enablerepo=dag to use.
 enabled=0
 gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
 includepkgs=acsiidoc* bitt* perl*
 # priority requires yum-priorities. Must also be enabled in
 # yum.conf and /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf
 priority=20

 I tried to install asciidoc using yum like so:

 # yum --enablerepo=dag install asciidoc
 Loading fastestmirror plugin
 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
  * epel: www.muug.mb.ca
  * adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com
  * dag: apt.sw.be
  * base: mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
  * updates: www.muug.mb.ca
  * addons: www.muug.mb.ca
  * extras: www.muug.mb.ca
 Reducing Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 5 - x86_64 to included
 packages only
 Finished
 Reducing Dag Wieers RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux to
 included packages only
 Finished
 Setting up Install Process
 Parsing package install arguments
 No package asciidoc available.
 Nothing to do

 What am I doing wrong?


 --
 ***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
 James B. Byrne                mailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
 Harte  Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
 9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
 Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
 Canada  L8E 3C3

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-27 Thread Scott Silva
on 3-27-2009 1:07 PM Michael Peterson spake the following:
 JohnS wrote:
 On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:15 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
   
 JohnS wrote:
 
 On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:

   
   
 I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if 
 there is a work around.
 
 
 ---
 What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your
 are using to install? How old is the cable? Last thing strip it down to
 the bare minimum harwdare and install?

 JohnStanley
   
   
   
   
 I burned the CD images on Windows using Roxio and an AOpen DVD Read/ 
 CDRW drive.

 The burned CD's test fine in more than one system.
 I do have to test them with ide=nodma to get them to pass.

 The CD Drive and IDE Cable on the system I am trying to install is 5 
 years old.

 I searched the CentOS site and mailing list for similar issues and found 
 one dating back to last year.
 The anaconda errors were similar.

 I finally got 5.2 to install and the fix was to tell the kernel to 
 ignore the ide tape device.
 The tape drive is on hdd and the following allowed me to do a GUI 
 install with 512 MB.

 linux ide=nodma hdd=none
 
 Just currious does the tape drive work since install? Would like like to
 know the brand of it also for reference.

   
 I thought I would post my result so that this request for help could be 
 closed.

 Thanks for having this list to provide the avenue to a solution.
 
 JohnStanley

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
   
 
 I have used mt and cpio to access the tape drive with and they work fine.
 
 The tape drive is an ECRIX VXA-1a ATAPI TAPE drive.
It must resemble a hard drive just enough to confuse the installer.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-27 Thread JohnS

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:10 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
 on 3-27-2009 1:07 PM Michael Peterson spake the following:
  JohnS wrote:
  On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 14:15 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:

  JohnS wrote:
  
  On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:21 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote:
 


  I would really like to get CentOS 5.2 or 5.3 installed on the system if 
  there is a work around.
  
  
  ---
  What are you using to burn the CDs? How old is the CD Drive that your
  are using to install? How old is the cable? Last thing strip it down to
  the bare minimum harwdare and install?
 
  JohnStanley




  I burned the CD images on Windows using Roxio and an AOpen DVD Read/ 
  CDRW drive.
 
  The burned CD's test fine in more than one system.
  I do have to test them with ide=nodma to get them to pass.
 
  The CD Drive and IDE Cable on the system I am trying to install is 5 
  years old.
 
  I searched the CentOS site and mailing list for similar issues and found 
  one dating back to last year.
  The anaconda errors were similar.
 
  I finally got 5.2 to install and the fix was to tell the kernel to 
  ignore the ide tape device.
  The tape drive is on hdd and the following allowed me to do a GUI 
  install with 512 MB.
 
  linux ide=nodma hdd=none
  
  Just currious does the tape drive work since install? Would like like to
  know the brand of it also for reference.
 

  I thought I would post my result so that this request for help could be 
  closed.
 
  Thanks for having this list to provide the avenue to a solution.
  
  JohnStanley
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

  
  I have used mt and cpio to access the tape drive with and they work fine.
  
  The tape drive is an ECRIX VXA-1a ATAPI TAPE drive.
 It must resemble a hard drive just enough to confuse the installer.
--
That's why I wondered and wanted to know. Seems like BSD has the same
problem with the same tape drive.

JohnStanley

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting asciidoc

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
Brian Mathis wrote:
 You need to set enabled=1 in the config file.  Currently you have 
 enabled=0

I don't think you need enabled=1 in the repo file if you are using 
`yum --enablerepo=dag ...` on the command line, but...


 [dag]
 [...]
 enabled=0
 gpgkey=http://dag.wieers.com/packages/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt
 includepkgs=acsiidoc* bitt* perl*
^
...this should probably read 'asciidoc'? :-)

Cheers

 frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
nate wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
 
 [...]
 
 I think it's safe to assume that the majority of CentOS users out
 there run CentOS on servers, not on desktops/laptops/etc.

So I'm one from the minority then :-).  CentOS 5 is running on (almost) 
all servers and (really) all Linux clients here.  Being used to the 
RedHat way from a former job and not being happy with the fast release 
cycles of Fedora, CentOS was a logical choice.  No more system 
instabilities and no more package incompatibilities since we switched 
from Fedora (let's keep fingers crossed).  That's what I call 
Enterprise grade :-)

I don't care if the CentOS release comes days or weeks (or months) after 
the RedHat release as long as it comes one day.

And sincerely: I don't understand, why RedHat/CentOS should not be used 
on desktops.

Cheers

 frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB, AutoMount VNC

2009-03-27 Thread Frank Thommen
Guy Boisvert wrote:
 MHR wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Guy Boisvert boisvert@videotron.ca 
 wrote:
 Hi!

I'm trying to figure out how to make automount do its job when nobody
 is logged at the console and the user access the server by VNC.  Does
 anybody knows how to make CentOS automount USB Hard Drives / Pendrive
 when accessed by VNC?

 Could you describe the problem a little more clearly?  Separation of
 console from USB-accessible hardware, how VNC fits in in this
 scenario, etc.

 It sounds like someone wants to log in remotely (VNC), plug in a
 (local) USB device and access it (remotely), which doesn't make sense
 to me.

 Thanks.

 mhr
 ___
 
 Hi,
 
   It make senses if you're running a box headless (it will be headless 
 soon, now i'm testing it with K+V+M attached).  We're using a CentOS box 
 to plug USB Flash drive  external hard drive into it.  The CentOS box 
 is then used to FTP the content of these external drives to a Winblows 
 box, all that filtered by a firewall between the 2 boxes.  Only FTP is 
 allowed.
 
   Doing some tests on the CentOS box, i saw that if i log into the 
 console, then the local session and the remote VNC sessions will see the 
 drives automounted.  If i log out of the console, then the VNC session 
 won't see anything.  It's like the automount works only if somebody is 
 logged at the console.

I assume that with console you mean X11/desktop manager.  In this case 
Gnome or KDE handle the mounting of removable devices for you.  The 
automounter hasn't anything to do with it.

If you want the automounter to handle removable devices, then you'll 
have to add appropriate automounter map entries.  Something like

/etc/auto.master:
/media /etc/auto.media

/etc/auto.media:
usb:/dev/sda1


or you could use a program map like the following (not my invention, I 
took this from the autofs mailing list):

-
#!/bin/sh
if ntfs-3g.probe /dev/sda1; then
echo -fstype=ntfs-3g,other-opts :/dev/sda1
else
echo -fstype=vfat,other-opts :/dev/sda1
fi
-

You'll probably find other examples on the net.

I'm not sure if such an automounter setup collides with Gnome/KDE 
automounting.

Cheers

 frank
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-27 Thread Robert Nichols
Frank Thommen wrote:
 nate wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:

 [...]
 I think it's safe to assume that the majority of CentOS users out
 there run CentOS on servers, not on desktops/laptops/etc.
 
 So I'm one from the minority then :-).  CentOS 5 is running on (almost) 
 all servers and (really) all Linux clients here.  Being used to the 
 RedHat way from a former job and not being happy with the fast release 
 cycles of Fedora, CentOS was a logical choice.  No more system 
 instabilities and no more package incompatibilities since we switched 
 from Fedora (let's keep fingers crossed).  That's what I call 
 Enterprise grade :-)

Amen!  I'm very much hoping that 5.3 will allow me to run CentOS on my
laptop so that I can get away from the half-implemented features and
Let's see what last night's update broke! issues with Fedora.  CentOS
works just fine on my desktop.

 I don't care if the CentOS release comes days or weeks (or months) after 
 the RedHat release as long as it comes one day.

The problem for everyone is that security updates that come along during
those weeks (or months) either get delayed until the CentOS release
comes or else somebody (i.e., an already overworked developer) has to
make the extra effort to make the patch work in the current release.

-- 
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Welcome to the CentOS mailing list (Digest mode)

2009-03-27 Thread Phil Schaffner
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:38 -0700, MHR wrote:
 And your point was . . . ?

Well, now we all know his password and can unsubscribe him if we don't
like him.  :-P

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Getting asciidoc

2009-03-27 Thread Phil Schaffner
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 16:20 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
 I need to install asciidoc on my build machine.  There is a version
 for CentOS-5 available at dags rpm site.  I have a repository
 configured for dag like so:
...
 Reducing Dag Wieers RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux to
 included packages only


 What am I doing wrong?

What are you including?  Will get ONLY included packages with this
option.

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Server Hang

2009-03-27 Thread Lanny Marcus
2009/3/27 Care India care.india.supp...@gmail.com:
 I have Cent OS 5.1
 I also have http://phpsysinfo.sourceforge.net/
 I have asterisk running .
 Now when I look at System Information ,
 I see that Physical Memory keep increasing and at one point it reaches
 96%. Then my sever get hang and then I have to restart it.
 I have 4 GB RAM.

(a) It appears that you also posted in the CentOS5 Forum:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=19272forum=37

It would be better, if you posted either here in the Mailing List, or
in the Forum. One or the other, but not both.

(b) As Gerald Clark pointed out to you, you should be posting in the
VicidialNow mailing list or forum, not here:

You should be asking all these questions at your vicidialNOW supplier.
We have no way of knowing what may or may not have been changed
when this custom asterisk package.

(c) You posted in the forum:

uname -a Returns me :

Linux vicidialnow.example.com 2.6.18-53.el5 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 02:22:48
EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Installing on LVM on SW-RAID

2009-03-27 Thread Norberto Bensa
Hello list,

I'm trying to install CentOS 5.2 on LVM on a SW-RAID level 1, but I'm
unable to understand how to use the installer correctly.

What I'm trying to do is emulate something I've already done with
another distro where:

sda5 \
   RAID1 -- /boot
sdb5 /

sda6 \
   RAID1 -- LVM -- /root, /home, /usr, /var... etc.
sdb6 /

I've succesfully created the raid, and the PV for LVM, but I can't
figure out how to create a VG inside the PV.

Is it possible using the installer, or should I better install it
using one disk, and once installed create the raid/pv/vg, and move
everything around by hand?

Many thanks in advance,
Norberto
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing on LVM on SW-RAID

2009-03-27 Thread Dnk
I went through this EXACT thing last month, and with help of the list,  
I got it done. I can send you my step by step tomorrow.

D



On 27-Mar-09, at 7:07 PM, Norberto Bensa nbe...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello list,

 I'm trying to install CentOS 5.2 on LVM on a SW-RAID level 1, but I'm
 unable to understand how to use the installer correctly.

 What I'm trying to do is emulate something I've already done with
 another distro where:

 sda5 \
   RAID1 -- /boot
 sdb5 /

 sda6 \
   RAID1 -- LVM -- /root, /home, /usr, /var... etc.
 sdb6 /

 I've succesfully created the raid, and the PV for LVM, but I can't
 figure out how to create a VG inside the PV.

 Is it possible using the installer, or should I better install it
 using one disk, and once installed create the raid/pv/vg, and move
 everything around by hand?

 Many thanks in advance,
 Norberto
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB, AutoMount VNC

2009-03-27 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Frank Thommen
frank.thom...@embl-heidelberg.de wrote:

 I assume that with console you mean X11/desktop manager.  In this case
 Gnome or KDE handle the mounting of removable devices for you.  The
 automounter hasn't anything to do with it.

Consequently the other option is to change the VNC configuration so
that you're running the Gnome or KDE desktop manager in VNC.  The
tricky bit then is to get it to log out properly as if you were really
on the console.

I put the following in $HOME/.vnc/xstartup to accomplish that on CentOS 5:

 8  snip 
#!/bin/sh

[ -x /etc/vnc/xstartup ]  exec /etc/vnc/xstartup
[ -r $HOME/.Xresources ]  xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
xsetroot -solid grey
vncconfig -iconic 
gnome-terminal --geometry=80x24+10+10 --title=$VNCDESKTOP Desktop 
( gnome-session ; kill `cat $HOME/.vnc/${VNCDESKTOP% *}.pid` ) 
 8  snip 

This runs gnome-session in the background, then kills the desktop when
the session ends.  Replace gnome with KDE to taste.

The recommended way to run the desktop ...

# Uncomment the following two lines for normal desktop:
# unset SESSION_MANAGER
# exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc

... has the undesirable side-effect of leaving the VNC server running
with no session or window manager and no X clients when you exit from
the session.  This is annoying unless you also configure the server to
exit on the last client disconnect.  I prefer having the server
disconnect the clients when the session ends, instead.

(I'd be happy to learn there's a more convenient way to accomplish that.)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing on LVM on SW-RAID

2009-03-27 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote:
 I went through this EXACT thing last month, and with help of the list,
 I got it done. I can send you my step by step tomorrow.

The thread about 4 x 500GB ?

I read it quickly, but if I got it right, they're suggesting to put
root fs outside of the lvm pv...


Thanks,
Norberto
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing on LVM on SW-RAID

2009-03-27 Thread Dnk




On 27-Mar-09, at 7:48 PM, Norberto Bensa nbe...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com  
 wrote:
 I went through this EXACT thing last month, and with help of the  
 list,
 I got it done. I can send you my step by step tomorrow.

 The thread about 4 x 500GB ?

 I read it quickly, but if I got it right, they're suggesting to put
 root fs outside of the lvm pv...


 Thanks,
 Norberto
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

It was that thread, but it grew into quite the discussion. I wrote my  
stuff down step by step for myself to remember later. What kind of  
raid are to setting up? In my case I had 2x raid 1 then lvm. But the  
basics should still apply. I am on my phone hence I can't send you the  
write up until tomorrow.

D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing on LVM on SW-RAID

2009-03-27 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 27-Mar-09, at 7:48 PM, Norberto Bensa nbe...@gmail.com wrote:

 The thread about 4 x 500GB ?

 What kind of
 raid are to setting up?

I'm testing it inside virtualbox. Two drives for a raid1 setup.
Nothing serious at this time, it's just a test I'm doing for a future
deployment of CentOS as a Xen server.

I'm trying to make a raid1 between two partitions of two drives for
/boot, and a second raid1 of two partitions of the same two drives for
lvm. Like this:

sda5 + sdb5 = raid1 = md0 = /boot
sda6 + sdb6 = raid1 = md1 = PV = VolGroup001 = /, /var, /home, /usr


I'll wait until tomorrow for your step-by-step instructions. Thanks!

Best regards,
Norberto
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Installing on LVM on SW-RAID

2009-03-27 Thread Norberto Bensa
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Norberto Bensa nbe...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'll wait until tomorrow for your step-by-step instructions. Thanks!

Never mind. I've done it using the graphical installer (I was using
the text mode installer)

CentOS is installing right now.

Thanks!!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos