[CentOS-docs] Request for personal page
Dear Ralph, Can I obtain write permission to my home page on the wiki? My username is TimothyLee. Thanks! Regards, Timothy ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Translating wiki into Chinese
Dear Ralph, I'd like to help translate the wiki into Chinese. Can you create the zh page and give me write permission? Regards, Timothy ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Translating wiki into Chinese
Timothy Lee wrote: Dear Ralph, I'd like to help translate the wiki into Chinese. Can you create the zh page and give me write permission? Do we have anyone here willing to help with that? Because that looks like a mean feat, when you try do to that alone - no idea how much time you have on your hands :) Ralph pgpmXQafrJDha.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Request for personal page
Timothy Lee wrote: Dear Ralph, Can I obtain write permission to my home page on the wiki? My username is TimothyLee. Thanks! Done. Ralph pgpbAAGw7uj6k.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] proposed changes option
hi, Could we have something like this for people who dont have edit rights : - people can make an 'edit' - but the edit is handled either as a patch emailed to the page maintainer / edit group / editorial group / this list ? but not displayed till its 'accepted / approved ' -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Translating wiki into Chinese
On 04/02/2009 05:00 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Timothy Lee wrote: I'd like to help translate the wiki into Chinese. Can you create the zh page and give me write permission? Do we have anyone here willing to help with that? Because that looks like a mean feat, when you try do to that alone - no idea how much time you have on your hands :) I have friends who can review the translation for me. But I figured that the wiki defaults to English content for un-translated pages, I could take a piecemeal approach. Regards, Timothy ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:0406 CentOS 5 i386 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:0406
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0406.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
213ceda164ed20d9db0da91e7f0ca71e perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386.rpm
9c2a30126c4acff2e55b9c5bd318b231 perl-suidperl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386.rpm
Source:
528d537d2b6396b2cbd9acf35e5a1fae perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:0406 CentOS 5 x86_64 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:0406
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0406.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a967b52d038dfa696d2e1f278b4498ec perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm
23885b81934aaefc3071665ae62fdee1 perl-suidperl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
528d537d2b6396b2cbd9acf35e5a1fae perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] CentOS 5.1 no muestra el puntero del mouse
Para probar instalé la distro CentOS 5.1, pero no muestra el puntero del mouse. Gracias. atte begin:vcard fn:John Drummond Aravena n:Drummond Aravena;John org:ADM-Planning Consultores;Area Apoyo TI email;internet:jdrumm...@adm-planning.cl title:Analista Sistemas Computacionales x-mozilla-html:TRUE version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Problema con Darwin Streaming Server
Hola a todos; Instale un Darwin Streaming server (dss) en un centos 5.2, todo parecia funcionar bien, el panel de administracion, el arranque del servicio pero a la hora de querer llamar un archivo en el servidor recibo el error que se puede apreciar en este ticket; http://dss.macosforge.org/trac/ticket/34 En los logs de la aplicacion no se ve ningun tipo de error con referencia a esto. =( Alguien tiene algo de experiencia con esta aplicacion y en este error en particular ? Saludos y gracias de antemano!. Guillermo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Manual Facil para GIMP
Hola a todos Necesito un manual para GIMP básico, para poder manipular las imágenes sin importar en que capa estén, por que tengo el problema que si es un objeto agregado antes que otros u otro yano lo puedo manipular de ninguna manera. De antemano gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Manual Facil para GIMP
Aqui tienes uno: http://docs.gimp.org/es/ - Un Saludo Solucions Informatiques JM, S.L. i...@redesjm.com tie...@tiendajm.com i...@manualeslinux.com http://www.redesjm.com http://www.tiendajm.com http://www.manualeslinux.com Fax: 96 112 82 30 -Mensaje original- De: Mario Villela Larraza mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com Responder a: centos-es@centos.org Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: [CentOS-es] Manual Facil para GIMP Fecha: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:41:39 -0600 Hola a todos Necesito un manual para GIMP básico, para poder manipular las imágenes sin importar en que capa estén, por que tengo el problema que si es un objeto agregado antes que otros u otro yano lo puedo manipular de ninguna manera. De antemano gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Manual Facil para GIMP
http://docs.gimp.org/es/index.html On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:41:39 -0600, Mario Villela Larraza wrote Hola a todos Necesito un manual para GIMP básico, para poder manipular las imágenes sin importar en que capa estén, por que tengo el problema que si es un objeto agregado antes que otros u otro yano lo puedo manipular de ninguna manera. De antemano gracias --- Gino Alania Hurtado RPM #781455 Tl: 997279281 NITCOM Labs (http://www.nitcom.com) ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema con Darwin Streaming Server
Hola, Que version estas usando de Darwin? Yo tuve muchos problemas con la version 6, por lo que termine usando la 5.6 y todo me funciona de maravillas. Especificamente esta: DarwinStreamingServer-5.6.0.498-4.el4.pp.i386.rpm Podes descargarlo desde aca: http://rapidshare.com/files/216721125/DarwinStreamingServer-5.6.0.498-4.el4.pp.i386.rpm.html Tambien lo estoy usando sobre un Centos 5.2 i386 Saludos, Alejandro 2009/4/2 Guille gri...@gmail.com: Hola a todos; Instale un Darwin Streaming server (dss) en un centos 5.2, todo parecia funcionar bien, el panel de administracion, el arranque del servicio pero a la hora de querer llamar un archivo en el servidor recibo el error que se puede apreciar en este ticket; http://dss.macosforge.org/trac/ticket/34 En los logs de la aplicacion no se ve ningun tipo de error con referencia a esto. =( Alguien tiene algo de experiencia con esta aplicacion y en este error en particular ? Saludos y gracias de antemano!. Guillermo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema con Darwin Streaming Server
Ok, muchas gracias por tu respuesta, voy a probar este rpm. El error que tenias era el mismo que comente yo ? Saludos y gracias nuevamente!. Guillermo El 2 de abril de 2009 19:26, Alejandro cdgr...@gmail.com escribió: Hola, Que version estas usando de Darwin? Yo tuve muchos problemas con la version 6, por lo que termine usando la 5.6 y todo me funciona de maravillas. Especificamente esta: DarwinStreamingServer-5.6.0.498-4.el4.pp.i386.rpm Podes descargarlo desde aca: http://rapidshare.com/files/216721125/DarwinStreamingServer-5.6.0.498-4.el4.pp.i386.rpm.html Tambien lo estoy usando sobre un Centos 5.2 i386 Saludos, Alejandro 2009/4/2 Guille gri...@gmail.com: Hola a todos; Instale un Darwin Streaming server (dss) en un centos 5.2, todo parecia funcionar bien, el panel de administracion, el arranque del servicio pero a la hora de querer llamar un archivo en el servidor recibo el error que se puede apreciar en este ticket; http://dss.macosforge.org/trac/ticket/34 En los logs de la aplicacion no se ve ningun tipo de error con referencia a esto. =( Alguien tiene algo de experiencia con esta aplicacion y en este error en particular ? Saludos y gracias de antemano!. Guillermo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] agregar usuarios
hola comunidad tengo problemas en agregar usuarios y no con el root si no que quiero asignar a un usuario especial pepe esta tarea de poder agregar usuarios, y como no quiero que tenga permisos de root como puedo hacer esto? gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] agregar usuarios
killerfs wrote: hola comunidad tengo problemas en agregar usuarios y no con el root si no que quiero asignar a un usuario especial pepe esta tarea de poder agregar usuarios, y como no quiero que tenga permisos de root como puedo hacer esto? gracias intenta con sudo saludos! epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] agregar usuarios
El tipico problema de su. 1.- Logeate con tu usuario 2.- Luego escribes: # su - 3.- Como root, escribes porsiaca su - 4.- Luego creas tu usuario: useradd pepito Saludos El 2 de abril de 2009 19:02, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com escribió: killerfs wrote: hola comunidad tengo problemas en agregar usuarios y no con el root si no que quiero asignar a un usuario especial pepe esta tarea de poder agregar usuarios, y como no quiero que tenga permisos de root como puedo hacer esto? gracias intenta con sudo saludos! epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Anthony Mogrovejo cel 9-91681659 Consultor Junior IT Documents Project Fedora Linux User # 433253 Ubuntu User # 9562 - Quisiera cambiar al mundo pero no me dan los RPM... ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] A set of PHP 5.2.9 RPM packages built for Enterprise Linux 4.7 and 5.3
On 04/02/2009 03:29 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote: Michael Liang wrote: Hello, I think the links should be useful for someone who looking for PHP 5.2 RPM using at CentOS. Have fun! http://oss.oracle.com/projects/php/ Overview This project supplies PHP 5.2.9 RPM packages built for Oracle Enterprise Linux 4.7 and 5.3 on x86 and x86_64. They will also install on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Are they suhosin patched? Not according to the spec file. Choon.net's mail header patch may be useful as well. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Timo Schoeler Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:42 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3 just installed their NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.44-pkg2 driver. I had it running on my CentOS 5.2 x64 machine, and I'm happily surprised that it builds and runs okay on 5.3 also. Me too, but why shouldn't it? We've rarely had any problems with Nvidia's proprietary drivers with CentOS, or RHEL for that matter. YMMV of course, just curious on what kind of problems you've had? -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:26 AM To: CentOS General List Subject: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads! For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers. I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly earlier today. If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that you also use that feature. Sharing as fast as I can, never seen this kind of activity before, it's like a shark feeding frenzy... The CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD torrent I'm seeding says the share ratio is 40928, and rapidly increasing. That can't possibly be right, can it?? Have to cap the upload speed to 25kBps during work hours, or my computer would be unusable. Maybe I should move this seeding to a CentOS-machine instead... DHT is enabled over here as well. -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael A. Peters Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:29 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3 I suppose I should move to the new way that relinks it automagically when new kernel is released, I don't know - I'm fine with the kernel version specific kmod- way. Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful mechanism to me. -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if you have a fat pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers. I have a chubby pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly earlier today. If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that you also use that feature. Sharing as fast as I can, never seen this kind of activity before, it's like a shark feeding frenzy... The CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD torrent I'm seeding says the share ratio is 40928, and rapidly increasing. That can't possibly be right, can it?? Have to cap the upload speed to 25kBps during work hours, or my computer would be unusable. Maybe I should move this seeding to a CentOS-machine instead... DHT is enabled over here as well. Hi there, there's really some traffic going on torrent-wise: [View: main] CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD done 3787,1 MB Rate: 928,2 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 142450,0 MB [View: main] CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD done 4346,3 MB Rate: 194,7 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 100310,6 MB ;) [both have a upload limit of 2Mbps, which is sometimes hit.] Cheers, Timo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Out of sync mirror / nss error
centos.mirror.nac.net is out of sync (at least for updates) http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/ vs http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/centos/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/ this is what is causing the nss/nss-devel error when doing a yum update Transaction Check Error: package nss-3.12.2.0-4.el5.centos (which is newer than nss-3.12.2.0-2.el5.centos) is already installed Kingsly -- --- Kingsly At Users Dot SourceForge Dot Net -- http://kingsly.org/ --- pgpHLAHPUHo1m.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Shadow passwords NOT md5'ed ?
Hello, I have a very weird problem on a CentOS 5.2 system. A few months ago, encrypted passwords in the shadow file were MD5'ed - allowing for long passwords, rather than only 8 characters max. Today, passwords are 3DES'ed only. No way to find how the system reverted to DES-encrypting. But what's more bothersome is we cannot get the system to go the MD5 way again, despite all our best efforts. Authconfig says this : pam_unix is always enabled shadow passwords are enabled password hashing algorithm is md5 So... where to look ? Tia, -- FdL ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
Thomas Dukes wrote on Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:04:02 -0400: Changed all references in repo file to baseurl from mirror Please don't do that. If you want to hardcode the mirror then look for a mirror that you like and use that one, but not the central CentOS distribution base. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Out of sync mirror / nss error
Kingsly John wrote: centos.mirror.nac.net is out of sync (at least for updates) http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/ you should really be getting in touch with the admin of that mirror - almost none of the mirrors admins will be on this list. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update for 5.3 failed on subversion and gstreamer-plugins-good
MHR wrote: Transaction Check Error: package subversion-1.4.6-0.1.el5.rf (which is newer than subversion-1.4.2-4.el5) is already installed file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf The glibc update went fine. Do I need to uninstall subversion and gstreamer-plugins-good to update, then reinstall them? I did not see these listed in the release notes Why should we list rpmforge packages in the Release Notes? exclude subversion from base if you want to use the one from rpmforge because it is newer - and remove gstreamer-plugins-bad, because it shares some files with gstreamer-plugins-good from from the base repository. There will be a fix for gstreamer-plugins-bad from rpmforge soon. But that up there is definitely not a problem which can be solved within CentOS. Ralph pgpVSyhnkiSdB.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shadow passwords NOT md5'ed ?
Frédérique Da Luene wrote: pam_unix is always enabled shadow passwords are enabled password hashing algorithm is md5 Check /etc/sysconfig/authconfig for USEMD5=yes If that is there and you still get 3DES passwords, then, ummm, check that your /usr/bin/passwd is the one which is shipped with CentOS. Ralph pgpu0IJM7DTec.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
Michael A. Peters wrote: Mufit Eribol wrote: Michael A. Peters wrote: Thomas Dukes wrote: The error I got when I ran 'yum update' was: Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.2.0-2-el5.centos is needed by package nss-devel Yes, that will do it - devel packages do need to be the same EVR. Sounds like you figured it out. I have exactly the same problem. No nss-devel is installed currently. But yum update always gives the below message: ... Package nss-devel.i386 0:3.12.2.0-2.el5.centos set to be updated ... nss = 3.12.2.0-2.el5.centos is needed by package nss-devel ... I can't install nss-devel either due to the very same error. Sorry Michael, I still haven't figured it out. No clue at all. Sounds like something in your upgrade requires nss-devel but an nss-devel to match the updates nss isn't in the repo, so the update finds the wrong nss-devel. What happens when you comment out the mirror list and uncomment the baseurl for both base and updates? yum update gives the error. But yum clean all yum upgrade fixed the problem as stated by one of the above posters and upgraded to 5.3 without any problem. Thank you. Mufit ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Out of sync mirror / nss error
2009/4/2 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org Kingsly John wrote: centos.mirror.nac.net is out of sync (at least for updates) http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/x86_64/RPMS/ you should really be getting in touch with the admin of that mirror - almost none of the mirrors admins will be on this list. Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the mirror admins aren't listed anywhere are they? I couldn't see any mention in the mirror list pages, in the mirror status pages or on the mirror itself that suggested who the admin of that server was... Maybe John has access to a list, but, if not, it could prove tricky for him to find the admin if they aren't on this list... d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shadow passwords NOT md5'ed ?
Hello, I have a very weird problem on a CentOS 5.2 system. A few months ago, encrypted passwords in the shadow file were MD5'ed - allowing for long passwords, rather than only 8 characters max. Today, passwords are 3DES'ed only. No way to find how the system reverted to DES-encrypting. But what's more bothersome is we cannot get the system to go the MD5 way again, despite all our best efforts. Authconfig says this : pam_unix is always enabled shadow passwords are enabled password hashing algorithm is md5 So... where to look ? Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group /etc/shadow /etc/gshadow. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 09:14 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: snip Hi there, there's really some traffic going on torrent-wise: [View: main] CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD done 3787,1 MB Rate: 928,2 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 142450,0 MB [View: main] CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD done 4346,3 MB Rate: 194,7 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 100310,6 MB ;) [both have a upload limit of 2Mbps, which is sometimes hit.] For those who are insatiably curious, http://torrent.centos.org:6969/ It gets really interesting at certain times. Cheers, Timo snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Out of sync mirror / nss error
D Tucny wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but, the mirror admins aren't listed anywhere are they? I couldn't see any mention in the mirror list pages, in the mirror status pages or on the mirror itself that suggested who the admin of that server was... Maybe John has access to a list, but, if not, it could prove tricky for him to find the admin if they aren't on this list... there is a centos-mirrors list at http://lists.centos.org/ - admins are required to be on that list in order to get listed as a centos mirror. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael A. Peters Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 7:29 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3 I suppose I should move to the new way that relinks it automagically when new kernel is released, I don't know - I'm fine with the kernel version specific kmod- way. Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful mechanism to me. I don't know too much about it - but I believe it is what some of the 3rd party repos have moved do. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of William L. Maltby Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:47 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads! For those who are insatiably curious, http://torrent.centos.org:6969/ It gets really interesting at certain times. According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway, that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts everyday, at least I don't. -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael A. Peters Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:50 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3 I suppose I should move to the new way that relinks it automagically when new kernel is released, I don't know - I'm fine with the kernel version specific kmod- way. Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful mechanism to me. I don't know too much about it - but I believe it is what some of the 3rd party repos have moved do. Ok, google it is, but what do I search for? I really am clueless as to what this thing is... Automagic doesn't quite feel like what I want to search for. automatic kernel link graphics driver or some such? -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Sorin Srbu wrote: According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway, that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts everyday, at least I don't. here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Steve Huff Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:03 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3 On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful mechanism to me. it's very useful. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Kernel_Module_Support $ man dkms $ sudo yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install nvidia-x11-drv $ sudo reboot ... profit! once you have done this, DKMS will rebuild the nvidia driver module for you the first time you boot a new kernel. provided the module builds without problems, you won't have to think about it any more. Nice, thanks! I'll try this out on a machine. On a related sidetrack; is there any difference between the proprietary Nvidia-drivers and the ones from eg rpmforge? Specifically, we use the proprietary Nvidia drivers on our dozen or so course computers because they support stereo-3D. When our former *nix-admin set this up years ago, there weren't anything else to use than the proprietary drivers. Hence my question. -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: Automagically? Care to elaborate on that? Sounds like a useful mechanism to me. it's very useful. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Kernel_Module_Support $ man dkms $ sudo yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install nvidia-x11-drv $ sudo reboot ... profit! once you have done this, DKMS will rebuild the nvidia driver module for you the first time you boot a new kernel. provided the module builds without problems, you won't have to think about it any more. -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:07 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads! Sorin Srbu wrote: According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway, that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts everyday, at least I don't. here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to 0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to do with this. Hmm... -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
Sorin Srbu wrote: On a related sidetrack; is there any difference between the proprietary Nvidia-drivers and the ones from eg rpmforge? Specifically, we use the proprietary Nvidia drivers on our dozen or so course computers because they support stereo-3D. When our former *nix-admin set this up years ago, there weren't anything else to use than the proprietary drivers. Hence my question. the rpmforge driver *is* the proprietary nvidia driver. It's just nicely packaged in an rpm, with dkms for rebuilding when you get a new kernel. It's also not the latest version, which may or may not be a problem for you. It's working well enough for a lot of people, but YMMV. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Sorin Srbu wrote: That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to 0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to do with this. Hmm... the machines seeding at those high 100mbps rates are all hosted in DC's with good peerings all around - and we've spoken with the hosting companies about what these machines are doing! - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:32 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Nvidia driver on CentOS 5.3 Sorin Srbu wrote: On a related sidetrack; is there any difference between the proprietary Nvidia-drivers and the ones from eg rpmforge?Specifically, we use the proprietary Nvidia drivers on our dozen or so course computers because they support stereo-3D. When our former *nix-admin set this up years ago, there weren't anything else to use than the proprietary drivers. Hence my question. the rpmforge driver *is* the proprietary nvidia driver. It's just nicely packaged in an rpm, with dkms for rebuilding when you get a new kernel. It's also not the latest version, which may or may not be a problem for you. It's working well enough for a lot of people, but YMMV. Thx, I'm trouble-shooting now. Dkms autoinstaller something-or-other didn't go down too well. Looks promising though. 8-) -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:34 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads! Sorin Srbu wrote: That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to 0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to do with this. Hmm... the machines seeding at those high 100mbps rates are all hosted in DC's with good peerings all around - and we've spoken with the hosting companies about what these machines are doing! Guess everybody was really tweaked to get the stuff really fast. ;-D Nice go though. I got my copies pretty fast too. It was well worth the wait. ;-) -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Two sets of Heartbeat HTTPD clusters on same subnet
I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2. We successfully do this with many pairs of HA nodes in the same subnet, using different UDP ports... Under /etc/ha.d/ha.cf: udpport someNumber Use a different authkey for each pair so as to avoid accidental snafus with mixing up nodes from different pairs. -Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shadow passwords NOT md5'ed ?
Hi Barry --- En date de : Jeu 2.4.09, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org a écrit : De: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group /etc/shadow /etc/gshadow. I have just checked, and libuser.conf has : crypt_style = md5 modules = files shadow create_modules = files shadow pwck and grpck both tell us everything is ok. This is really strange... -- FdL ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
rra...@comcast.net wrote: What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 It is EOLed. That is all fixes to 5.2 are 5.3. So there is little choice unless you take on the whole management issue. BTW, I had some systems that would simply NOT do an install with the 5.2 boot CD. I HAD to install with 5.1 then upgrade them to 5.2. So I only recently finally pulled my local 5.1 repo. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
rra...@comcast.net wrote: What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you. Ralph pgp6YxJiPFgO8.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Shadow passwords NOT md5'ed ?
Frédérique Da Luene wrote: De: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org Have you checked /etc/libuser.conf for crypt_style? pwck and grpck can verify integrity of the data in /etc/passwd /etc/group /etc/shadow /etc/gshadow. I have just checked, and libuser.conf has : crypt_style = md5 modules = files shadow create_modules = files shadow pwck and grpck both tell us everything is ok. This is really strange... Existing entries don't (and can't) change when you change crypt_style so everything should still be OK. What happens when you add a new user with the system tools? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] duplicate commands
Hi, I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c? Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show up? 1 root 15 0 2064 592 512 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.40 init [3] 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/0] 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/0] 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/0] 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [migration/1] 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ksoftirqd/1] 7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [watchdog/1] 8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/0] 9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [events/1] 10 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [khelper] 11 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kthread] 15 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.08 [kblockd/0] 16 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.47 [kblockd/1] 17 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kacpid] 90 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [cqueue/0] 91 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [cqueue/1] 94 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [khubd] 96 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kseriod] 160 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [pdflush] 161 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.79 [pdflush] 162 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.03 [kswapd0] 163 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/0] 164 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [aio/1] 316 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [kpsmoused] 346 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/0] 347 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 [ata/1] Best Regards, Melinda Odom Design Hosting, Inc. Web Design, Web Hosting, Ecommerce Solutions 479-471-0891 CST i...@designhosting.biz http://www.designhosting.biz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duplicate commands
Melinda Odom wrote: Hi, I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c? Is this normal? If not, how do I fix it to make only one command show up? Pretty normal for a system with two CPUs/dual core. Ralph pgpIF753muFRm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duplicate commands
Melinda Odom wrote on Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:27:55 -0500: I just upgraded to CentOS 5.3 last night and see these duplicate commands (migration/0, migration/1) when running top -c? you did never run top before? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Karanbir Singh wrote: Sorin Srbu wrote: According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway, that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts everyday, at least I don't. here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with a 50kbyte/sec uplink ca (thats about 500kbps)... if I raise the cap much higher, it seriously throttles my home network (6Mbps in, 700k out)... I know, I know, I should implement some form of QoS or packet prioritization at my firewall. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
John R Pierce wrote: here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with a 50kbyte/sec uplink ca (thats about 500kbps)... If you can - you should. The costs of running those torrents at 100mbps is way too high to run over any sustained period of time ( and they are all offline now ). So once the first rush has spread out - the whole user experience is totally driven by the other users part of the deluge. Normally, I'd keep 1 machine running from within .centos.org to make sure there was always atleast 1 seed for each of the torrents. And that machine runs only at 10mbps, for all the torrents and is also a part of other services within centos.org - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
(Karanbir Singh)
2. CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update
(Karanbir Singh)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:53:03 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 i386
kernel Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090401235303.ga31...@tantra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0326 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e043c7a35fa15bf1440c8108ec56f091 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
b8ebb86dc506162ed7acba02b98dda5b kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
c0d63a647563b04a5844efe7771f8a3f
kernel-debug-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
c04552e6188e4bef49f5c2030e6ec048 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
a27d27b57417c344ad3b648d9f0f062c kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
80f8f5a9b1b9fbe5758ecfd351c63b89
kernel-debuginfo-common-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
4f9cebd8ea89a0430ab23930ea5da47b kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
ad40116878ea62f4bd0adb10780f35fb kernel-doc-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.noarch.rpm
1a7c4488f9c22ffb8a829f1b42da0cca kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i386.rpm
3aa9025aa89f463a67c6d94d131b122a kernel-PAE-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
adddc5fcb252983136e2a4af50757ab6
kernel-PAE-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
e2d35fc212910983b2d2ac787d622c3b kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
f50b7051031f0f71d67c3f07c22f kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
e614ba82f0e192d48a9b90f50990f1df
kernel-xen-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
89fbb778f65c7c4a77d983ffa2e1b06f kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm
Source:
51ffaeef6c7f2517608993184633a340 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:53:11 +
From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0326 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
kernel Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20090401235311.ga31...@tantra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0326 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0326.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
2b62ec56108c44ab31421d9597eb12d0 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
09b298aff5ca7a27f4164262cdf77389 kernel-debug-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
59be35adf801740f61cbd16251f92092
kernel-debug-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
81914f2aef92a657f3559c559ec023de
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
ab38b9c518c5d4ae01f5f11039841046 kernel-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
23b9b2f854d3b157e44d47d6d8235f54
kernel-debuginfo-common-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
ac40a86a8d4f5b47ebc784962d9ac830 kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
ec15faa5e80fe3bf45f17dea680781a4 kernel-doc-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.noarch.rpm
cc97bf4ff8dcd39f2f56513dd5143035 kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
ad6b4c90502693c1e1dd8afb29c7066a kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
6b3e8282d573addcdc72c3d8b6fe9ad5
kernel-xen-debuginfo-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
40d78b5f33004ab867a4917a6353618c kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
51ffaeef6c7f2517608993184633a340 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 2
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 5.3 Update Success
Greetings CentOS Team- Since the list tends to be filled with things don't work and why did you do it this way and complaint X, I thought I'd make a small deviation... I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 server. I simply ran 'yum update' and rebooted with no problems. Everything continues to work as rock solid as before. So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
on 4-2-2009 6:53 AM rra...@comcast.net spake the following: What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 Your hair will fall out and your ears will ring constantly. You will gain weight that no amount of dieting and exercise will be able to get rid of. You will be the laughing stock of all the cool CentOS kids. Hackers will infiltrate your systems and set up free porn sites. The porn will be really lame and crappy and full of viruses and rootkits. . signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
Ralph Angenendt wrote: rra...@comcast.net wrote: What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you. Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs fixed where in the old 5.2 kernel or only in the newer 5.3 kernel, but it makes that point about staying current with a distro. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] acpid events failing after first suspend
Hello I've configured acpid on my laptop to make the powerbutton hibernate the laptop. I modified /etc/acpid/events/power.conf with the following content: event=PWRF action=/usr/bin/pm-hibernate On the first boot it works like it should, but after the laptop has resumed, the powerbutton doesn't respond anymore. This is an extract from /var/log/acpid when the powerbutton responds: [Wed Apr 1 15:36:46 2009] client connected from 2332[0:0] [Wed Apr 1 15:36:46 2009] 1 client rule loaded [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] received event button/power PWRF 0080 0001 [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] notifying client 2198[68:68] [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] notifying client 2332[0:0] [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] executing action /usr/bin/pm-hibernate [Wed Apr 1 15:37:16 2009] BEGIN HANDLER MESSAGES [Wed Apr 1 18:10:47 2009] END HANDLER MESSAGES [Wed Apr 1 18:10:47 2009] action exited with status 0 [Wed Apr 1 18:10:47 2009] completed event button/power PWRF 0080 0001 After the first resume, nothing like that appears in the logs, like the powerbutton was never pushed. I have acpid version 1.0.4-7.el5 installed, I did not experience this issue on another distro which ships with acpid 1.0.8. Thanks, Best regards, Glenn Matthys ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 5.3 - NetworkManager applet
So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main laptop). I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command. On both laptops, the update ends with a dialog panel (oh, I am using gnome): The NetworkManager applet caould not find some required resources. It cannot continue. I don't see anything in /var/log/messages that might shed light on this. On both these systems, I have the NetworkManager deamon disabled. I was able to start it in a terminal window with the services command and it seems to have worked; I see the icon on the system tray. Meanwhile, going through messages I see a message at the end of the bootup about nm-system-settings about loading plugin ifcfg-rh. First it parses ifcfg-lo and then notifies that it is ignoring the loopback device config. It then goes on to read ifcfg-eth0 (which is set for ONBOOT=no, so nothing more happens). So is this dialog a 'bug' or just an artifact of upgrading from 5.2 to 5.3? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: rra...@comcast.net wrote: What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you. Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs fixed where in the old 5.2 kernel or only in the newer 5.3 kernel, but it makes that point about staying current with a distro. All of my servers use C5.2 as OpenVZ HN I use vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.028stab060.2 kernel All containers are C5.2 Upgrading may not be possible/feasible Suggestions ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the backup server, which is completely subservient to my will -- unlike development servers with real live users who might complain), but it went very smoothly. Thank you very, very much! -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success
2009/4/2 Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the backup server, which is completely subservient to my will -- unlike development servers with real live users who might complain), but it went very smoothly. Thank you very, very much! Updated 4 desktops (kde), 5 servers (one httpd, one postgres (pgdg), one nfsd (not yet rebooted), two aimed at cluster testing). Everything went fine. Still have a couple servers to do. Kudos to CentOS and RH team ! Laurent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:50:30 Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the backup server, which is completely subservient to my will -- unlike development servers with real live users who might complain), but it went very smoothly. Thank you very, very much! +1 Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] EXT4 root fails for kickstart
Hi All, For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with my kickstart set for 10G for root at ext3 and it works fine. 10,15 and 20GB with EXT4 all fail. BTW: can't put /boot on it either. Just a heads up for all. ;) -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com The point of the HPC scheduler is to keep everyone equally unhappy. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade/no upgrade
on 4-2-2009 10:40 AM rra...@comcast.net spake the following: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: rra...@comcast.net wrote: What is the downside of sticking with 5.2 No security fixes. And the cool kids on the block will laugh at you. Look at today's announcement. Now I don't know if the security bugs fixed where in the old 5.2 kernel or only in the newer 5.3 kernel, but it makes that point about staying current with a distro. All of my servers use C5.2 as OpenVZ HN I use vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.028stab060.2 kernel All containers are C5.2 Upgrading may not be possible/feasible Suggestions Pray? There must be an upgrade path for OpenVZ systems, you just have to take more steps. http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel5/028stab060.8 is the latest kernel at OPenvz. It is dated today. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] cups-lpd installation fails
Hi All, i am getting a cupd-lpd dependancy problem with CentOS 5.3. package cups-lpd is not installed Installing cups-lpd ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile 2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package cups-lpd.i386 1:1.2.4-11.18.el5 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 for package: cups-lpd -- Finished Dependency Resolution 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 from base has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 is needed by package 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 (base) Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile 2 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package cups-lpd.i386 1:1.2.4-11.18.el5 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 for package: cups-lpd -- Finished Dependency Resolution 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 from base has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: cups = 1:1.2.4 is needed by package 1:cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5.i386 (base) Failed to install cups-lpd. Abort! -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com The point of the HPC scheduler is to keep everyone equally unhappy. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - NetworkManager applet
Robert Moskowitz wrote: So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main laptop). I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command. On both laptops, the update ends with a dialog panel (oh, I am using gnome): The NetworkManager applet caould not find some required resources. It cannot continue. Probably a problem with an update to wpa_supplicant not being pulled in. See the release notes. Ralph pgpbsj5eEfOF2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CMAN: Cluster membership rejected
Hello, Several machine cannot joint the cluster after a reboot. Here is a example of the error : caserta kernel: CMAN: Join request from como.dmz.lexum.pri rejected, node ID 3 already in use by ancona.dmz.lexum.pri All cluster.conf are the same (checked with md5sum) I googled this but did find nothing Any ideas? tx ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EXT4 root fails for kickstart
on 4-2-2009 11:16 AM James A. Peltier spake the following: Hi All, For those testing EXT4 I seem to have found an issue with anaconda where by if you specify EXT4 fstype in your kickstart file it will not install and complains that if needs another 250MB of disk space. I've tried with my kickstart set for 10G for root at ext3 and it works fine. 10,15 and 20GB with EXT4 all fail. BTW: can't put /boot on it either. Just a heads up for all. ;) Isn't ext4 renamed to ext4dev in the preview? Or is that just the userspace tools? Just a guess. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - NetworkManager applet
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: So far I have upgraded 2 test laptops (no big servers or this, my main laptop). I am running from local repos. The OS repo is from downloading the isos and extracting them. The Update repo I get with an rsync command. On both laptops, the update ends with a dialog panel (oh, I am using gnome): The NetworkManager applet caould not find some required resources. It cannot continue. Probably a problem with an update to wpa_supplicant not being pulled in. See the release notes. Thanks for the pointer. I will read them again. But this time I know what to focus on! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success
On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:50, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the backup server, which is completely subservient to my will -- unlike development servers with real live users who might complain), but it went very smoothly. Thank you very, very much! +1 Best, :-) Marko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote: John R Pierce wrote: here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with a 50kbyte/sec uplink ca (thats about 500kbps)... If you can - you should. The costs of running those torrents at 100mbps is way too high to run over any sustained period of time ( and they are all offline now ). So once the first rush has spread out - the whole user experience is totally driven by the other users part of the deluge. Normally, I'd keep 1 machine running from within .centos.org to make sure there was always atleast 1 seed for each of the torrents. And that machine runs only at 10mbps, for all the torrents and is also a part of other services within centos.org Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a peer? I mean, I have a 100Mbps link to my local LAN, which is connected via a 2Gbps optical cables to my national center, which in turn has several uplinks of various bandwidth (from 32Mbps to 10Gbps) connected to surrounding countries. From there on I don't know. So how can I be sure that for example someone on the other side of the planet can utilize my whole bandwidth? Of course, we can initiate some peer-to-peer data transfer and measure the actual speed, but isn't the terminology 100Mbps to outside world a little bit undefined in general? Because not all parts of outside world may always have greater bandwidth than my uplink? Is there maybe some web site with a planet-wide topology of the internet, along with actual bandwidths of all the links, so one can estimate the transfer speed between two arbitrary points on the globe? FWIW, tommorow I'll use torrent to download the dvd iso's for CentOS 5.3 (32bit and 64bit archs), and I can leave them seeded 24/7 for an undefinite time in the future, cca 3 years at least, or maybe untill 5.4 appears. If anyone can pull 100Mbps from me, I'll be glad to help the community. It's only that I am not so sure that it is well defined to say I have an 100Mbps uplink. Uplink to my nearest neighbor, yes, but further than that... Best, :-) Marko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote: I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an NFS filesystem. I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount, and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is: 1. Boot into single user node. 2. run: /sbin/service network start 3. run: yum -y update filesystem If your system emitted the warning, but did not 'bail', it is safe to retieve the rpm locally, and to run: # rpm -Uvh filesystem*rpm --force as there are no scripts in play: [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ sudo rpm -q --scripts filesystem [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ The cause is the NFS root_squash being in effect when a NFS overmount is on a mountpoint, it seems. /home happens to express it It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home left. -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote: It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home left. Say it ain't so! -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote: I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an NFS filesystem. I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount, and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is: 1. Boot into single user node. 2. run: /sbin/service network start 3. run: yum -y update filesystem If your system emitted the warning, but did not 'bail', it is safe to retieve the rpm locally, and to run: # rpm -Uvh filesystem*rpm --force as there are no scripts in play: [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ sudo rpm -q --scripts filesystem [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ The cause is the NFS root_squash being in effect when a NFS overmount is on a mountpoint, it seems. /home happens to express it It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home left. I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the network, where that directory is mounted and displayed in a folderview under KDE4. I had no problems whatsoever. Is this the sort of situation you mean? Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
Paul Heinlein wrote: I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an NFS filesystem. No problem here, /home is exported as nfs4 with sec=kerb5. regards Olaf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote: It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home left. Say it ain't so! It ain't so. I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the filesystem rpm). Should I implement the workaround suggested by Russ for each machine, or will a fixed rpm come along eventually? (I'm not impatient!) Hywel. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote: John R Pierce wrote: here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with a 50kbyte/sec uplink ca (thats about 500kbps)... If you can - you should. The costs of running those torrents at 100mbps is way too high to run over any sustained period of time ( and they are all offline now ). So once the first rush has spread out - the whole user experience is totally driven by the other users part of the deluge. Normally, I'd keep 1 machine running from within .centos.org to make sure there was always atleast 1 seed for each of the torrents. And that machine runs only at 10mbps, for all the torrents and is also a part of other services within centos.org Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a peer? I mean, I have a 100Mbps link to my local LAN, which is connected via a 2Gbps optical cables to my national center, which in turn has several uplinks of various bandwidth (from 32Mbps to 10Gbps) connected to surrounding countries. From there on I don't know. So how can I be sure that for example someone on the other side of the planet can utilize my whole bandwidth? Of course, we can initiate some peer-to-peer data transfer and measure the actual speed, but isn't the terminology 100Mbps to outside world a little bit undefined in general? Because not all parts of outside world may always have greater bandwidth than my uplink? Is there maybe some web site with a planet-wide topology of the internet, along with actual bandwidths of all the links, so one can estimate the transfer speed between two arbitrary points on the globe? FWIW, tommorow I'll use torrent to download the dvd iso's for CentOS 5.3 (32bit and 64bit archs), and I can leave them seeded 24/7 for an undefinite time in the future, cca 3 years at least, or maybe untill 5.4 appears. If anyone can pull 100Mbps from me, I'll be glad to help the community. It's only that I am not so sure that it is well defined to say I have an 100Mbps uplink. Uplink to my nearest neighbor, yes, but further than that... The ISP's that sell you your uplink are supposed to take care of actually having sufficient bandwidth to their peers. http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm http://www.internettrafficreport.com/7day.htm -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
Marko Vojinovic wrote: Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a peer? yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on the East coast US, one on the West Coast, one in Germany, one in London and the rest coming on at diff places. What makes a major difference however is when there are a lot of people, even with lesser speeds, seeding at the same time. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Plemons Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 16:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell... Try network solutions... No ssh john Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Hywel Richards wrote: It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home left. Say it ain't so! It ain't so. :-) I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the filesystem rpm). Should I implement the workaround suggested by Russ for each machine, or will a fixed rpm come along eventually? (I'm not impatient!) I just kicked everyone off, killed all apps with open file descriptors on /home, umounted /home, upgraded the rpm, then re-mounted /home. That worked just fine. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the latter, but seriously... i'd be looking for someone providing either VPS or dedicated servers. you get root, you get to configure. lots and lots of choices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. I've been very happy with http://www.bluehost.com They offer ssh, rsync, SSL, and seem to have a compiler installed. Very responsive service. I've been using them for 15 months without a single complaint of problem. I have no affiliation with this company - just a client. Would like them to include http/https and email. Not sure about https - but I think so. Email support includes IMAP, POP and web via squirrel mail. -Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:19 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a peer? yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on the East coast US, one on the West Coast, one in Germany, one in London and the rest coming on at diff places. What makes a major difference however is when there are a lot of people, even with lesser speeds, seeding at the same time. Thinking of analogies, if one person throws a small stone at you, maybe you get a small bruise at worst. If a thousand do it at the same time you *die*, likely. That is to say, thousands throwing packets your way all at once tend to negate a single-point bottleneck existing between you and any specific source off your ISPs network, if they tend to come from all different directions (different remote networks). 'Course if you live on a nasty cable provider (we'll leave them unnamed here) who feels it right to throttle you based on various usage statistics, you may only get hit by a few stones at once. -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Jason, Check out http://rimuhosting.com/ I know they have good support staff and are flexible in the support they provide. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
John R Pierce wrote: Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the latter, but seriously... i'd be looking for someone providing either VPS or dedicated servers. you get root, you get to configure. lots and lots of choices. I'm currently using linode. I have CentOS running in a xen there. My site is small low traffic, I can't vouch for how well it works in high traffic sites, but it is really nice to have full control. You probably will have some updating to do - the only CentOS image available when I signed up was 5.0 but it yum updates no problem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
At Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:21:39 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Plemons Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 16:58 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell... Try network solutions... No ssh TekTonic provides Virtual Servers running CentOS. SSH is installed. You can install any addition stuff, including -devel packages, etc. www.tektonic.net Starting at $28/month (20gig disk, 512Meg RAM). john Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
In article 49d526bf.7020...@mavin.com, John Plemons centos@centos.org wrote: Try network solutions... I've never found them to be a good solution. There are plenty around that are a lot better! -- http://www.spinics.net/lists/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
John R Pierce wrote: Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with godaddy is a registrar, not a hosting service.they pretend to be the latter, but seriously... i'd be looking for someone providing either VPS or dedicated servers. you get root, you get to configure. lots and lots of choices. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos http://easyspeedy.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? now is a good time to point out that given X number of hosting companies, the ones that support centos directly are better than the ones that dont :) and you can find a list of a few of these people who directly support CentOS at http://www.centos.org/mirrors -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote: Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason I use WebFaction -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com The point of the HPC scheduler is to keep everyone equally unhappy. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] filesystem rpm fails when /home is NFS mounted
on 4-2-2009 2:00 PM Anne Wilson spake the following: On Thursday 02 April 2009 21:40:59 R P Herrold wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Paul Heinlein wrote: I don't know if it's a bug or a feature, but the filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos rpm won't upgrade cleanly if /home is an NFS filesystem. I confirm this is present in 5.3 where /home is an NFS mount, and that I missed it in testing. A workaround is: 1. Boot into single user node. 2. run: /sbin/service network start 3. run: yum -y update filesystem If your system emitted the warning, but did not 'bail', it is safe to retieve the rpm locally, and to run: # rpm -Uvh filesystem*rpm --force as there are no scripts in play: [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ sudo rpm -q --scripts filesystem [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ The cause is the NFS root_squash being in effect when a NFS overmount is on a mountpoint, it seems. /home happens to express it It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home left. I have /home exported and ran the upgrade from this laptop over the network, where that directory is mounted and displayed in a folderview under KDE4. I had no problems whatsoever. Is this the sort of situation you mean? Anne The way I read it was their /home was mounted on NFS, not just exported. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrade
In article ceb75a570904010531q7defb281vcc40856a65f3a...@mail.gmail.com, Hakan Koseoglu centos@centos.org wrote: yum clean all yum ugrade seems to fix my problem. I had problems on two systems (both problems different) and doing yum clean all fixed them. Not sure why but I'm sure glad it worked. ;) -- http://deepcreekhotsprings.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
on 4-2-2009 1:36 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following: On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote: John R Pierce wrote: here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps. geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine running with a 50kbyte/sec uplink ca (thats about 500kbps)... If you can - you should. The costs of running those torrents at 100mbps is way too high to run over any sustained period of time ( and they are all offline now ). So once the first rush has spread out - the whole user experience is totally driven by the other users part of the deluge. Normally, I'd keep 1 machine running from within .centos.org to make sure there was always atleast 1 seed for each of the torrents. And that machine runs only at 10mbps, for all the torrents and is also a part of other services within centos.org Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a peer? I mean, I have a 100Mbps link to my local LAN, which is connected via a 2Gbps optical cables to my national center, which in turn has several uplinks of various bandwidth (from 32Mbps to 10Gbps) connected to surrounding countries. From there on I don't know. So how can I be sure that for example someone on the other side of the planet can utilize my whole bandwidth? Of course, we can initiate some peer-to-peer data transfer and measure the actual speed, but isn't the terminology 100Mbps to outside world a little bit undefined in general? Because not all parts of outside world may always have greater bandwidth than my uplink? Is there maybe some web site with a planet-wide topology of the internet, along with actual bandwidths of all the links, so one can estimate the transfer speed between two arbitrary points on the globe? FWIW, tommorow I'll use torrent to download the dvd iso's for CentOS 5.3 (32bit and 64bit archs), and I can leave them seeded 24/7 for an undefinite time in the future, cca 3 years at least, or maybe untill 5.4 appears. If anyone can pull 100Mbps from me, I'll be glad to help the community. It's only that I am not so sure that it is well defined to say I have an 100Mbps uplink. Uplink to my nearest neighbor, yes, but further than that... Best, :-) Marko But with bittorrent, one person doesn't use all of your bandwidth. Hundreds of users are each using a small percentage of it. So if you have 100 peers accessing 100 different slices of the torrent at 1 mb each, there goes the whole 100 mb. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Latest updates break b43 wireless [RESOLVED]
On Wednesday April 1 2009, Terry Polzin wrote: Can't connect to network even with no security. Is this possibly a firmware issue? It would appear that wpa_supplicant has a new option (-u) to enable functionality with NetworkManager. I found it in the /etc/sysconfig/wpa_supplicant.rpmnew file signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell...
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 4:55 PM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: [CentOS] [OT] Godaddy hell... Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason I have used godaddy for hosting my e-commerce site for years. You probably need to go with one of their shared servers or dedicated servers. You won't get what you need in a hosting plan. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
