Re: [CentOS-es] Problema con el DNS
Hola, prueba a hacer un host www.elnombredetudominio.loquesea Si desde el servidor te da respuesta correcta de las dns, quizás tengas que buscar el problema en los equipos desde los que quieres acceder, asegurate que servidor de dns están consultando esos equipos clientes. El 27 de agosto de 2009 05:41, Jeiler Rego Romero jeiler04...@scu.jovenclub.cu escribió: Hola a todos! Tengo montado un servidor con CentOS 5.2 y estoy presentando problemas con el DNS. Desde el servidor puedo ver todos las URL pero desde la red no puedo conseguir algunas URL y en ocasiones carga la pagina inicial pero no deja loguearse y me da el siguiente error: (113) No route to host Tengo montado el Iptables como Firewall y el Squid como Proxy Saludos, Jeiler. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- ___ REPARACIONONLINE GARANTIA PARA SU PC ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Servidor proxy
hola a todos necesito alguien que me ayude a configurar squid en centos 5.3 algun manual o que me guie Gracias Luis ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor proxy
El 27 de agosto de 2009 14:12, Luis Nuñezluchonune...@gmail.com escribió: hola a todos necesito alguien que me ayude a configurar squid en centos 5.3 algun manual o que me guie Gracias Luis ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es En esta dirección puedes encontrar excelentes manuales al respecto http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/manuales-indice -- Jorge García gar...@gmail.com http://www.garsan.com.mx ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] Crontab Nobody
I have a crontab for Nobody. I tried to delete it in a root kcron, which I'm sure is how I dealt with this in the past, but it seems impossible to delete. Should I delete the file /var/spool/cron/nobody? It is owned root:root, perms 600. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Crontab Nobody
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Anne Wilson: I have a crontab for Nobody. I tried to delete it in a root kcron, which I'm sure is how I dealt with this in the past, but it seems impossible to delete. Should I delete the file /var/spool/cron/nobody? It is owned root:root, perms 600. Anne as root list: crontab -u nobody -l edit: crontab -u nobody -e remove: crontab -u nobody -r financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Crontab Nobody
On Thursday 27 August 2009 10:16:46 Christoph Maser wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Anne Wilson: I have a crontab for Nobody. I tried to delete it in a root kcron, which I'm sure is how I dealt with this in the past, but it seems impossible to delete. Should I delete the file /var/spool/cron/nobody? It is owned root:root, perms 600. Anne as root list: crontab -u nobody -l edit: crontab -u nobody -e remove: crontab -u nobody -r Thanks. I think that's got rid of it. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] saslauthd
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
First you will have to configure Postfix through main.cf:
...
Next you have to make the link between Postfix and Cyrus-SASL in
/usr/lib{64}/sasl2/smtpd.conf:
...
You are done.
Yes I am! :-)
In fact, I DID all the above (with more or less variants), but I was
wondering why the command testsaslauthd wouldn't allow me to test
authentication. Now I don't care anymore - what I need it for is: postfix
with SASL AUTH agains smtp clients and for THAT I only need a properly
filled and protected (postfix will have to be able to read the file)
/etc/sasldb2 file.
I was also wondering because on the machine that I'm migrating away from
the testsaslauthd command worked. Same config and both using the same
centos release. Ok - nevermind, the authentication works, a nice thing to
start a thursday with.
Thanks @Alexander, Kai and Nataraj and all others who cared!
Kind regards
Michael
Hello Michael,
glad that you managed to migrate to the new server.
If testsaslauthd gives an OK, this just means that saslauthd is running
and could verify the given credentials against the backend. If that
backend (-a) is shadow, then auth is checked against system users within
the shadow file. If the backend is pam, then a more complex setup is
possible. Besides checking too against system users in shadow, PAM could
be configured to test against an SQL database or an LDAP server.
If testsaslauthd is successful, it does not mean that Postfix client auth
must be successful too. That's because Postfix can be configured to use a
different authentication scheme: like as you did to use cyrus-sasl's
auxprop or even to use dovecot's sasl.
You can easily imagine a situation where the admin fills a sasldb with
users and their password and where all these users can be found as well as
system accounts within the shadow file. It may be intention by the admin
or just lack of understanding. Postfix using cyrus-sasl may be configured
to auth against the sasldb data, while saslauthd would work as well. (Here
with the difference that usernames in sasldb are of format
u...@domain.tld where using saslauthd -a shadow the usernames can just
be user.)
You may counter check what the smtpd.conf file contained on your old host.
It could be that saslauthd was the primary mechanism, but set as well the
option auto_transition. You find that explained in
/usr/share/doc/cyrus-sasl*/options.html. Running that it will fill the
sasldb by itself. So you may have the impression that sasldb was your
primary authentication pool.
One final note: For cyrus-sasl using auxprop with plugin sasldb is the
default and fault back. If nothing is configured or the configured setup
fails, then cyrus-sasl test with auxprop and sasldb.
Best regards
Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Source RPM issues. Mismatched Libs?
Johnny Hughes wrote: Justin Bull wrote: Hello, I am having some issues with the installation of the Icecast2 software on my CentOS 5.3 x64 machine. I am attempting to install from a source RPM provided by the developer. Upon executing: # rpmbuild --rebuild icecast-2.3.2-0.src.rpm Normal compilation takes place until the following error is thrown out: /usr/lib64/libxslt.so: undefined reference to `xmlXPathContextSetCache' I've done some research and found others have a similar issue. It appears this is only isolated with CentOS 5.x x64 builds and, according to the Icecast2 developer, is due to a mismatch between libxml2 and libxslt. My machine is a brand new install and is updated from the official mirrors. libxml2-devel and libxslt-devel are installed and are at their latest version (2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 and 1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 respectively at the time of this writing). For anyone who is interested in reading up on this, here are the Icecast2 threads related to this issue: http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=4851 http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=6506 http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=6210 I do apologize if I've made any formating mistakes and/or incorrect posting etiquette to the mailing list, as it is my first time using one. OK, all those people are mistaken. Your issue is that you have i386 packages installed as well as x86_64 packages installed and the linker is looking in the wrong place. Actually it *wants* to look in the right place, as shown by ld --verbose | grep SEARCH_DIR But it's probably being forced to look in the wrong place by a -L/usr/lib switch. Bug in the Makefile, perhaps in autotools as this crops up often (I don't use autotools so not sure). If you want to build x86_64 packages, you will have to do an install that has only x86_64 packages and no i386 packages. Or let the linker do its work without interfering with its builtin search path. I think that would be the proper fix, rather than the workaround of not having anything in /usr/lib. Regards, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Strange connectivity problem from linux.
Hi I have been facing a strange connectivity problem from CentOS and Fedora boxes. When I telnet to $ telnet adp.eease.com 443 it works fine some times and every 5-10 tries or so it says connection refused. And this does not happen from my windows box. Can anyone from this list try this on their linux installation and see if they get the same behaviour? Thanks Tharun ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Source RPM issues. Mismatched Libs?
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Justin Bull wrote: Hello, I am having some issues with the installation of the Icecast2 software on my CentOS 5.3 x64 machine. I am attempting to install from a source RPM provided by the developer. Upon executing: # rpmbuild --rebuild icecast-2.3.2-0.src.rpm Normal compilation takes place until the following error is thrown out: /usr/lib64/libxslt.so: undefined reference to `xmlXPathContextSetCache' I've done some research and found others have a similar issue. It appears this is only isolated with CentOS 5.x x64 builds and, according to the Icecast2 developer, is due to a mismatch between libxml2 and libxslt. My machine is a brand new install and is updated from the official mirrors. libxml2-devel and libxslt-devel are installed and are at their latest version (2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 and 1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 respectively at the time of this writing). For anyone who is interested in reading up on this, here are the Icecast2 threads related to this issue: http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=4851 http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=6506 http://icecast.imux.net/viewtopic.php?t=6210 I do apologize if I've made any formating mistakes and/or incorrect posting etiquette to the mailing list, as it is my first time using one. OK, all those people are mistaken. Your issue is that you have i386 packages installed as well as x86_64 packages installed and the linker is looking in the wrong place. Actually it *wants* to look in the right place, as shown by ld --verbose | grep SEARCH_DIR But it's probably being forced to look in the wrong place by a -L/usr/lib switch. Bug in the Makefile, perhaps in autotools as this crops up often (I don't use autotools so not sure). If you want to build x86_64 packages, you will have to do an install that has only x86_64 packages and no i386 packages. Or let the linker do its work without interfering with its builtin search path. I think that would be the proper fix, rather than the workaround of not having anything in /usr/lib. Well, that may be, however I would always recommend a clean build environment for all builds (not just this one). With mock available to build a chroot which contains only the exact required packages to build the code in question, I see no reason not to use it all the time when building. This prevents stray links to things you are not interested in anyway. That is how all packages are built in the fedora-rhel-centos world right now. In practice these kind of issues always come up when there are lots of i386 packages on an x86_64 machine, so why not build all code in a pure chroot? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange connectivity problem from linux.
I could only connect 3 times out of 10. This was from my Mac laptop running Leopard. It would appear that something abnormal is happening on this host. On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Tharun Kumar Allu wrote: Hi I have been facing a strange connectivity problem from CentOS and Fedora boxes. When I telnet to $ telnet adp.eease.com 443 it works fine some times and every 5-10 tries or so it says connection refused. And this does not happen from my windows box. Can anyone from this list try this on their linux installation and see if they get the same behaviour? Thanks Tharun ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] thinkpad x200 wireless LAN
Ned Slider wrote: Roger K. Wells wrote: On the following system: Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux the Intel 5100 pci wireless adapter appears to be detected and a reasonable driver is indicated (iwlagn) but the radio does not appear to be on, at least the little antenna like LED is off. The radio switch is on and the Bluetooth LED is on. Has any one conquered this yet? I don't think the LEDs are configured in the current kernels: # cat /boot/config-2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 | grep LED CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS=y # CONFIG_IWLWIFI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_IWLAGN_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_IWL3945_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT2400PCI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT2500PCI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT61PCI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT2500USB_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT73USB_LEDS is not set CONFIG_USB_LED=m CONFIG_USB_APPLEDISPLAY=m # LED devices CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y # LED drivers # LED Triggers CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=m CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_IDE_DISK=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=m Also, you will need the firmware for this device. Both rpmforge and elrepo.org have it... yum install iwl5000-firmware thanks for the replies. what does this mean: [ro...@rwells-cts ~]$ sudo yum install iwl5000-firmware Password: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirror.sanctuaryhost.com * extras: ftp.usf.edu * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net * base: updates.interworx.info * updates: mirror.raystedman.net Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package iwl5000-firmware.noarch 0:5.4.A.11-2.nodist.rf set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved Package Arch Version RepositorySize Installing: iwl5000-firmware noarch 5.4.A.11-2.nodist.rf rpmforge 183 k Transaction Summary Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total size: 183 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 6b8d79e6 GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 5] OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmforge-dag' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Antwort: Re: thinkpad x200 wireless LAN
Hi Roger, Roger K. Wells roger.k.we...@saic.com schrieb am 27.08.2009 14:26:17: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 6b8d79e6 GPG key retrieval failed: [Errno 5] OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmforge-dag' It means that you have gpgcheck enabled but the key to verify the packages' signature is missing. Go check yum.conf(5) and do a little research on how to properly configure the rpmforge repository (IIRC they have a RPM you can install which will do the magic) Frank. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to clone CentOS server ?
anyone used this one and can say experience: http://clonezilla.org/ --- 09/8/26 (三)，Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org 寫道： 寄件者: Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org 主旨: Re: [CentOS] How to clone CentOS server ? 收件者: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 日期: 2009年8月26日,三,上午7:05 Hello, I'd like to clone existing CentOS server. Can anybody recommend any working solution to achieve that ? Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) http://clonezilla.org/ Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ 您的生活即時通 － 溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定！ http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
Hi, I compiled a kernel from sources (2.6.30.5) and when system is booting shows these errors: SELinux: 61 classes, 69080 rules SELinux: class peer not defined in policy SELinux: class capability2 not defined in policy SELinux: class kernel_service not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class dir not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class chr_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class blk_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class sock_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission open in class fifo_file not defined in policy SELinux: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy SELinux: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy SELinux: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy SELinux: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy SELinux: permission setfcap in class capability not defined in policy SELinux: permission nlmsg_tty_audit in class netlink_audit_socket not defined in policy SELinux: permission forward_in in class packet not defined in policy SELinux: permission forward_out in class packet not defined in policy SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be denied How can I fix these errors? Thanks in advance! -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to clone CentOS server ?
Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2009, 14:59 +0200 schrieb mcclnx mcc: anyone used this one and can say experience: http://clonezilla.org/ I tried it 4 or 5 times. Always failed... financial.com AG Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München | Germany Frankfurt branch office/Niederlassung Frankfurt: Messeturm | Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Management board/Vorstand: Dr. Steffen Boehnert (CEO/Vorsitzender) | Dr. Alexis Eisenhofer | Dr. Yann Samson | Matthias Wiederwach Supervisory board/Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Dr. Ernst zur Linden (chairman/Vorsitzender) Register court/Handelsregister: Munich – HRB 128 972 | Sales tax ID number/St.Nr.: DE205 370 553 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange connectivity problem from linux.
Thank you I tested this today morning from the windows machine and it is behaving the same ( connection refused ). So I guess Its the host. I have a call with the Host admin some time today. This test should help me point the issue to him. Thanks Tharun On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Rohan Gilchristro...@gilchrist.me wrote: I could only connect 3 times out of 10. This was from my Mac laptop running Leopard. It would appear that something abnormal is happening on this host. On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Tharun Kumar Allu wrote: Hi I have been facing a strange connectivity problem from CentOS and Fedora boxes. When I telnet to $ telnet adp.eease.com 443 it works fine some times and every 5-10 tries or so it says connection refused. And this does not happen from my windows box. Can anyone from this list try this on their linux installation and see if they get the same behaviour? Thanks Tharun ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to clone CentOS server ?
mcclnx mcc wrote: anyone used this one and can say experience: http://clonezilla.org/ It works great under the following conditions: The target hardware is identical - or at least the same type disk controller. The target drive is at least as large as the source. You don't have software raid or LVM spanning drives. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] thinkpad x200 wireless LAN
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Ned Slidern...@unixmail.co.uk wrote: Roger K. Wells wrote: On the following system: Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 10:41:14 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux the Intel 5100 pci wireless adapter appears to be detected and a reasonable driver is indicated (iwlagn) but the radio does not appear to be on, at least the little antenna like LED is off. The radio switch is on and the Bluetooth LED is on. Has any one conquered this yet? I don't think the LEDs are configured in the current kernels: You want to try installing the centosplus kernel. Here is the relevant bug tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3544 The current cplus kernel has the following: CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS=y CONFIG_IWLWIFI_LEDS=y CONFIG_IWLAGN_LEDS=y CONFIG_IWL3945_LEDS=y # CONFIG_RT2400PCI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT2500PCI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT61PCI_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT2500USB_LEDS is not set # CONFIG_RT73USB_LEDS is not set Please be sure to read http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus before using the centosplus repository. Thanks for your reply. I did the iwl5000-firmware installation that Ned Slider advised and the radio appeared to start working. I then did the transition to the centosplus kernel, following the directions in the link that you provided, and then the LED started working. Thanks again Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] thinkpad x200 wireless LAN
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Roger K. Wellsroger.k.we...@saic.com wrote: Akemi Yagi wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Ned Slidern...@unixmail.co.uk wrote: You want to try installing the centosplus kernel. Here is the relevant bug tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3544 Please be sure to read http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus before using the centosplus repository. Thanks for your reply. I did the iwl5000-firmware installation that Ned Slider advised and the radio appeared to start working. I then did the transition to the centosplus kernel, following the directions in the link that you provided, and then the LED started working. Thanks again Glad to learn you've got everything sorted out. Thanks for reporting back. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: How can I fix these errors? Easy. Use the kernel provided in the distribution. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] apache virtual host load monitoring
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:47 PM, David Hrbáčhrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote: mod_proctitle is BSD only. Some solution is http://blog.antage.name/posts/%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B8-apache-2.html David Hrbáč yep, it's for BSD (but I heard that someone got it worked under linux).. thanks for the tips about mod_watch (ganglia looks as very huge solution for that purpose I think). any other tools guys? how you can see which of your vhost is most loaded? -- Sergey Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 54, Issue 12
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest... Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1232 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gnutls Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2009:1232 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gnutlsUpdate (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2009:1231 CentOS 4 i386 system-config-lvmUpdate (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEBA-2009:1231 CentOS 4 x86_64 system-config-lvm Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2009:123 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gnutls Update (Karanbir Singh) 6. CESA-2009:123 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gnutls Update (Karanbir Singh) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:50:26 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1232 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 gnutls Update To: CentOS-Announce centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 4a959202.7040...@centos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1232 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1232.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.i386.rpm gnutls-devel-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.i386.rpm src: gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090826/59323219/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:50:34 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1232 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 gnutls Update To: CentOS-Announce centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 4a95920a.2090...@centos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1232 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1232.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64 gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.i386.rpm gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.x86_64.rpm gnutls-devel-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.x86_64.rpm src: gnutls-1.0.20-4.el4_8.3.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090826/df3ccbdc/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 3 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:52:19 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1231 CentOS 4 i386 system-config-lvm Update To: CentOS-Announce centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 4a959273.9030...@centos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1231 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1231.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: system-config-lvm-1.1.4-1.3.el4_8.1.noarch.rpm src: system-config-lvm-1.1.4-1.3.el4_8.1.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090826/6115193f/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:52:25 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:1231 CentOS 4 x86_64 system-config-lvm Update To: CentOS-Announce centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 4a959279.2070...@centos.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1231 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1231.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64 system-config-lvm-1.1.4-1.3.el4_8.1.noarch.rpm src: system-config-lvm-1.1.4-1.3.el4_8.1.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090826/a4cec97e/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 5 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:53:11 + From: Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce]
Re: [CentOS] apache virtual host load monitoring
Sergey Smirnov wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:47 PM, David Hrbáčhrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote: mod_proctitle is BSD only. Some solution is http://blog.antage.name/posts/%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B8-apache-2.html David Hrbáč yep, it's for BSD (but I heard that someone got it worked under linux).. thanks for the tips about mod_watch (ganglia looks as very huge solution for that purpose I think). any other tools guys? how you can see which of your vhost is most loaded? I'm not sure how to do it in real time, but I run analog on the apache logs multiple times with configurations that specify different VHOSTINCLUDE settings. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
2009/8/27 Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: How can I fix these errors? Easy. Use the kernel provided in the distribution. Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/27 Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: How can I fix these errors? Easy. Use the kernel provided in the distribution. Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. Have you looked at dstat? If you find features that are not provided by the current version, you can always ask Dag. :) And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then I suggest you have him read a statement in a box highlighted in eye-soaring red: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
On 27.8.2009 17:15, Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburgerfilbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. IO statistics by process will be included in 5.4You could try to use the RHEL 5.4 beta kernels (Just remember, those are beta). Bgrds, Finnzi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. What your boss wants and what you want will not work with CentOS in that case. Short Answer: You will both be better off looking at a non-enterprise operating system. If the company has standardized on CentOS for long term support they could look at Fedora for this one off and then use CentOS-6 when that comes out. Long Answer: You would need to basically compile newer glibc, newer ldconfig, gcc, etc etc etc until at which point you have a base Fedora-11 system and some CentOS stuff that might still work (but highly unlikely). -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. Let me try it a different way. The current kernel used by Red Hat in RHEL 4 is a 2.6.9-x kernel and it has 1973 patches. The one currently in use in RHEL 5 is a 2.6.18-x kernel with 2882 patches. Many packages are compiled against kernel-headers and depend on the proc structure that is there. SELinux is just one of many issues you will have if you try to use a main line kernel on CentOS. You will need to have several of the Red Hat patches (modified to work with the new kernel tree) incorporated in order to use a newer kernel on CentOS. If you absolutely have to have a newer kernel (you should not do this ... but hey, it IS your machine) ... then instead of trying to use a main line kernel, instead try to use the latest one from here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/ This kernel has been tested for use with RHEL-5 and is 2.6.24-x. You still might have issues, but they should be far fewer than running a main line kernel on CentOS. Would you, if you boss told you he wanted you to, try to make the Windows Vista system files run on Windows 95? Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: How can I fix these errors? Easy. Use the kernel provided in the distribution. Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) 1) New expectations and/or 2) New boss and/or 3) New distribution ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Help Slim Down Centos Install
Hello Everyone, I was wondering does anyone know how I can slim down Centos install, what I mean by slim down is whenever I install Centos with nothing but xen. I have all type stuff that is not needed like bluetooth and etc. This is a server, so I know that bluetooth is not need but I don't have any other menus to remove software when install from cd. So what would be the best way to slim this server down to only need the bare to run xen? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help Slim Down Centos Install
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Chris Andrewskhr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I was wondering does anyone know how I can slim down Centos install, what I mean by slim down is whenever I install Centos with nothing but xen. I have all type stuff that is not needed like bluetooth and etc. This is a server, so I know that bluetooth is not need but I don't have any other menus to remove software when install from cd. So what would be the best way to slim this server down to only need the bare to run xen? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos When you install CentOS in the software section there is a customize now radio button, choose that option and enable/disable whichever package you want. -- Linux User #452368 http://twitter.com/vpadro Manifiesto por una cultura libre: http://culturalibre.org/ Doing a thing well is often a waste of time. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
2009/8/27 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. Let me try it a different way. The current kernel used by Red Hat in RHEL 4 is a 2.6.9-x kernel and it has 1973 patches. The one currently in use in RHEL 5 is a 2.6.18-x kernel with 2882 patches. Many packages are compiled against kernel-headers and depend on the proc structure that is there. SELinux is just one of many issues you will have if you try to use a main line kernel on CentOS. You will need to have several of the Red Hat patches (modified to work with the new kernel tree) incorporated in order to use a newer kernel on CentOS. If you absolutely have to have a newer kernel (you should not do this ... but hey, it IS your machine) ... then instead of trying to use a main line kernel, instead try to use the latest one from here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/ This kernel has been tested for use with RHEL-5 and is 2.6.24-x. You still might have issues, but they should be far fewer than running a main line kernel on CentOS. Would you, if you boss told you he wanted you to, try to make the Windows Vista system files run on Windows 95? Thanks, Johnny Hughes Thanks for provide the more smart and constructive answer so far. On ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/ I've only found kernel-rt, are they real time kernels? -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange connectivity problem from linux.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Tharun Kumar Allutharun.a...@gmail.com wrote: snip When I telnet to $ telnet adp.eease.com 443 it works fine some times and every 5-10 tries or so it says connection refused. And this does not happen from my windows box. Can anyone from this list try this on their linux installation and see if they get the same behaviour? [la...@dell2400 ~]$ telnet adp.eease.com 443 Trying 209.168.243.5... telnet: connect to address 209.168.243.5: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused [la...@dell2400 ~]$ BTW: I have telnet and anonymous FTP disabled on my web sites. Suggest the person in charge of that box switch to SSH. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
2009/8/27 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. Let me try it a different way. The current kernel used by Red Hat in RHEL 4 is a 2.6.9-x kernel and it has 1973 patches. The one currently in use in RHEL 5 is a 2.6.18-x kernel with 2882 patches. Many packages are compiled against kernel-headers and depend on the proc structure that is there. SELinux is just one of many issues you will have if you try to use a main line kernel on CentOS. You will need to have several of the Red Hat patches (modified to work with the new kernel tree) incorporated in order to use a newer kernel on CentOS. If you absolutely have to have a newer kernel (you should not do this ... but hey, it IS your machine) ... then instead of trying to use a main line kernel, instead try to use the latest one from here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/ This kernel has been tested for use with RHEL-5 and is 2.6.24-x. You still might have issues, but they should be far fewer than running a main line kernel on CentOS. Would you, if you boss told you he wanted you to, try to make the Windows Vista system files run on Windows 95? Of course I wouldn't it. I think that the comparison has little to do. Windows it's very different from Linux. MS it's product developed by an only company and closed souce. I think that the difference from using some distro with different kernel is far smaller that running Vista apps on Windows 95. Of course I don't expect support in the sense that someone solve my problems, I'm only was asking suggestions... -- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help Slim Down Centos Install
Chris Andrews wrote: Hello Everyone, I was wondering does anyone know how I can slim down Centos install, what I mean by slim down is whenever I install Centos with nothing but xen. I have all type stuff that is not needed like bluetooth and etc. This is a server, so I know that bluetooth is not need but I don't have any other menus to remove software when install from cd. So what would be the best way to slim this server down to only need the bare to run xen? http://www.owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange connectivity problem from linux.
Lanny Marcus wrote: On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Tharun Kumar Allutharun.a...@gmail.com wrote: snip When I telnet to $ telnet adp.eease.com 443 it works fine some times and every 5-10 tries or so it says connection refused. And this does not happen from my windows box. Can anyone from this list try this on their linux installation and see if they get the same behaviour? [la...@dell2400 ~]$ telnet adp.eease.com 443 Trying 209.168.243.5... telnet: connect to address 209.168.243.5: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused [la...@dell2400 ~]$ BTW: I have telnet and anonymous FTP disabled on my web sites. Suggest the person in charge of that box switch to SSH. I'd assume that 'telnet hostname 443' is intended to be a test for an https web service - which should in fact not permit a connection without ssl encryption. The linux version of telnet probably tries to do some options negotiations before it says it is connected and perhaps the windows version doesn't. A better test would be wget https://adp.eease.com -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SELinux messages after compiling new kernel
Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: Sergio Belkin wrote: 2009/8/27 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:46, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but Firstly: I need a newer kernel in order to get IO statistics from tools like atop, pidstat, etc. And secondly and most important: my boss wants that :) Then CentOS is not what you want. There is a reason why RHEL/CentOS does not ship with the latest kernel (and other components) and backports fixes instead. It's not trivial to make different versions of these components work together. If you try to replace the kernel (or other core components) you will see how painful it is. In fact, you started to see it already. You may try to continue to go that way, but I doubt anyone in this list will be able to help you there... you're pretty much on your own. So I'd be glad to hear other kind of solution :) Look at the latest Fedora or Ubuntu or another one of the cutting edge distributions that ship with more recent versions of components. Or ask yourself (or your boss) *WHY* you think you really need a later version of a certain component. What is your real problem? Is it support to a certain hardware? Is it network related? Is it (unfounded) fear that the kernel in CentOS might be vulnerable? It might be possible to solve your problem using CentOS in another way, if you come back to the list with the real problem we might be able to help you better. HTH, Felipe I've just explained the reason why I've compiled. Let me try it a different way. The current kernel used by Red Hat in RHEL 4 is a 2.6.9-x kernel and it has 1973 patches. The one currently in use in RHEL 5 is a 2.6.18-x kernel with 2882 patches. Many packages are compiled against kernel-headers and depend on the proc structure that is there. SELinux is just one of many issues you will have if you try to use a main line kernel on CentOS. You will need to have several of the Red Hat patches (modified to work with the new kernel tree) incorporated in order to use a newer kernel on CentOS. If you absolutely have to have a newer kernel (you should not do this ... but hey, it IS your machine) ... then instead of trying to use a main line kernel, instead try to use the latest one from here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/ This kernel has been tested for use with RHEL-5 and is 2.6.24-x. You still might have issues, but they should be far fewer than running a main line kernel on CentOS. Would you, if you boss told you he wanted you to, try to make the Windows Vista system files run on Windows 95? Thanks, Johnny Hughes Thanks for provide the more smart and constructive answer so far. On ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/RHEMRG/SRPMS/ I've only found kernel-rt, are they real time kernels? Yes, those are real time kernels. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Hi all, I can't seem to get my fonts to look decent under CentOS. I was able to make them look pretty good under Ubuntu, but for the life of me I can't make them look decent on CentOS. Screenshots: http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8563/ss1rzo.jpg http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7655/ss2ocf.jpg http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/6040/ss3j.jpg http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/466/uiprefs.jpg Any advice is appreciated because this sucks :) Ryan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:01:47 -0400 Ryan Pugatch r...@tripadvisor.com wrote: I can't seem to get my fonts to look decent under CentOS. I was able to make them look pretty good under Ubuntu, but for the life of me I can't make them look decent on CentOS. There are 2 sites that have full details: Using Sharp Fonts On A GNOME Desktop: http://www.howtoforge.com/sharp_fonts_gnome It's not Xfce, but it may be enough to get you started. and Optimal Use of Fonts on Linux http://avi.alkalay.net/linux/docs/font-howto/Font.html It's much more general -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
cen...@911networks.com wrote: On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:01:47 -0400 Ryan Pugatch r...@tripadvisor.com wrote: I can't seem to get my fonts to look decent under CentOS. I was able to make them look pretty good under Ubuntu, but for the life of me I can't make them look decent on CentOS. There are 2 sites that have full details: Using Sharp Fonts On A GNOME Desktop: http://www.howtoforge.com/sharp_fonts_gnome It's not Xfce, but it may be enough to get you started. and Optimal Use of Fonts on Linux http://avi.alkalay.net/linux/docs/font-howto/Font.html It's much more general Thanks for the links. I have already basically done everything there and have the ms fonts. Unfortunately they look pretty bad.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Ryan Pugatch wrote: Hi all, I can't seem to get my fonts to look decent under CentOS. I was able to make them look pretty good under Ubuntu, but for the life of me I can't make them look decent on CentOS. Screenshots: http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8563/ss1rzo.jpg http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7655/ss2ocf.jpg http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/6040/ss3j.jpg http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/466/uiprefs.jpg Any advice is appreciated because this sucks :) Ryan Get the freetype source RPM and recompile it with the bytecode interpreter enabled. Glenn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
RedShift wrote: Get the freetype source RPM and recompile it with the bytecode interpreter enabled. Glenn Yup already did that too :( Ryan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Ryan Pugatchr...@tripadvisor.com wrote: Hi all, I can't seem to get my fonts to look decent under CentOS. I was able to make them look pretty good under Ubuntu, but for the life of me I can't make them look decent on CentOS. Screenshots: http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8563/ss1rzo.jpg http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/7655/ss2ocf.jpg http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/6040/ss3j.jpg http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/466/uiprefs.jpg Any advice is appreciated because this sucks :) Ryan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos rpm -ivh http://repo.lastdot.org/tmp/msttcorefonts-2.0-1.noarch.rpm service xfs restart Restart your application.. Is it working now? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote: rpm -ivh http://repo.lastdot.org/tmp/msttcorefonts-2.0-1.noarch.rpm service xfs restart Restart your application.. Is it working now? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I removed my msttcorefonts pkg and installed yours.. no difference. I rebuilt freetype again just for good measure.. nothing. Now I somehow did manage somewhere along the line to make the fonts look a little better. But I still think they look horrible. http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/4732/sucko.jpg I am so frustrated because I have everything else just the way I want it.. but the fonts are so jagged ;[ -- Ryan Pugatch Systems Administrator, TripAdvisor ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:00, Ryan Pugatchr...@tripadvisor.com wrote: Get the freetype source RPM and recompile it with the bytecode interpreter enabled. Yup already did that too :( BCI is the one thing that makes a world of difference in fonts in Linux... so if you are still having bad results, it's probably because you did something wrong in the middle of the process... How did you do that? Did you change the without_bytecode_interpreter variable in the spec file? Did you install the RPM that you rebuilt? Did you restart X (with Ctrl-Alt-Backspace) or reboot the machine after the upgrade? If you have a 64-bit machine, did you build and install a 32-bit RPM as well? Would you care to show the output of rpm -qi freetype? HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 16:00, Ryan Pugatchr...@tripadvisor.com wrote: Get the freetype source RPM and recompile it with the bytecode interpreter enabled. Yup already did that too :( BCI is the one thing that makes a world of difference in fonts in Linux... so if you are still having bad results, it's probably because you did something wrong in the middle of the process... How did you do that? Did you change the without_bytecode_interpreter variable in the spec file? Did you install the RPM that you rebuilt? Did you restart X (with Ctrl-Alt-Backspace) or reboot the machine after the upgrade? If you have a 64-bit machine, did you build and install a 32-bit RPM as well? Would you care to show the output of rpm -qi freetype? HTH, Filipe Yes, I changed the variable in the spec and installed the RPM I built. I am on a 64-bit machine but did not install a 32-bit RPM. Looks like there are two versions.. the original and mine. What should I do? Requested output: [r...@localhost ~]$ rpm -qi freetype Name: freetype Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.2.1 Vendor: CentOS Release : 21.el5_3 Build Date: Fri 22 May 2009 10:04:13 AM EDT Install Date: Thu 27 Aug 2009 01:06:54 PM EDT Build Host: builder16.centos.org Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: freetype-2.2.1-21.el5_3.src.rpm Size: 626801 License: BSD/GPL dual license Signature : DSA/SHA1, Fri 22 May 2009 05:22:59 PM EDT, Key ID a8a447dce8562897 URL : http://www.freetype.org Summary : A free and portable font rendering engine Description : The FreeType engine is a free and portable font rendering engine, developed to provide advanced font support for a variety of platforms and environments. FreeType is a library which can open and manages font files as well as efficiently load, hint and render individual glyphs. FreeType is not a font server or a complete text-rendering library. Name: freetype Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.2.1 Vendor: (none) Release : 20Build Date: Thu 27 Aug 2009 04:24:21 PM EDT Install Date: Thu 27 Aug 2009 04:25:44 PM EDT Build Host: localhost.localdomain Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM: freetype-2.2.1-20.src.rpm Size: 655297 License: BSD/GPL dual license Signature : (none) Packager: Pugatch Ryan URL : http://www.freetype.org Summary : A free and portable font rendering engine Description : The FreeType engine is a free and portable font rendering engine, developed to provide advanced font support for a variety of platforms and environments. FreeType is a library which can open and manages font files as well as efficiently load, hint and render individual glyphs. FreeType is not a font server or a complete text-rendering library. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 17:03, Ryan Pugatchr...@tripadvisor.com wrote: Would you care to show the output of rpm -qi freetype? Yes, I changed the variable in the spec and installed the RPM I built. I am on a 64-bit machine but did not install a 32-bit RPM. Looks like there are two versions.. the original and mine. What should I do? If you have problems on 32-bit applications (I, for instance, used to run a 32-bit Firefox on a 64-bit machine to get Flash support without nspluginwrapper) you should build a 32-bit RPM and install it too. You can do that with this command: $ LDFLAGS=-m32 rpmbuild --target i386 -bb freetype.spec You might need to install glibc-devel.i386 and libX11-devel.i386 to build that one. I also noticed that you rebuilt 2.2.1-20 while 2.2.1-21.el5_3 is available, you might want to update it to the latest. I actually had a look at your last screenshot, and it does not seem too bad... It looks like the quality is already much better, I believe BCI is already working for you. If you still feel that an improvement is needed, then you might want to switch to the msttcorefonts, you might need to do that in Thunderbird's preferences though. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 17:03, Ryan Pugatchr...@tripadvisor.com wrote: Would you care to show the output of rpm -qi freetype? Yes, I changed the variable in the spec and installed the RPM I built. I am on a 64-bit machine but did not install a 32-bit RPM. Looks like there are two versions.. the original and mine. What should I do? If you have problems on 32-bit applications (I, for instance, used to run a 32-bit Firefox on a 64-bit machine to get Flash support without nspluginwrapper) you should build a 32-bit RPM and install it too. You can do that with this command: $ LDFLAGS=-m32 rpmbuild --target i386 -bb freetype.spec You might need to install glibc-devel.i386 and libX11-devel.i386 to build that one. I also noticed that you rebuilt 2.2.1-20 while 2.2.1-21.el5_3 is available, you might want to update it to the latest. I actually had a look at your last screenshot, and it does not seem too bad... It looks like the quality is already much better, I believe BCI is already working for you. If you still feel that an improvement is needed, then you might want to switch to the msttcorefonts, you might need to do that in Thunderbird's preferences though. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I agree that it looks better, but it doesn't seem to be as good as Ubuntu. I have Thunderbird using the msttcorefonts. Should rpm -qi freetype show both my built version and the other one as well? I don't remember how I ended up with the slightly older verison, but I can try updating. There's got to be some setting I'm missing that makes the fonts look just a bit better, because I think they still look rough. I have a screenshot from an Xubuntu install that I did and you can see the terminal in the shot. http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/6611/screenshotohr.png Not exactly the best comparison, but you can see the terminal text is quite a bit clearer than on CentOS: http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/4382/centk.jpg Thanks for your help, by the way. Ryan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] my fonts look horrible (centos5.3/xfce)
Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 17:22, Ryan Pugatchr...@tripadvisor.com wrote: Should rpm -qi freetype show both my built version and the other one as well? It shows the 32-bit and the 64-bit versions, that's why it shows it twice... I don't remember how I ended up with the slightly older verison, but I can try updating. You should probably do that, although it will probably not change anything... There's got to be some setting I'm missing that makes the fonts look just a bit better, because I think they still look rough. Yes, there is the font rendering settings (monochrome/best shapes/best contrast/subpixel smoothing [LCD]), and smoothing, hinting and subpixel order advanced settings. You can set those by running the gnome-font-properties program (included in the control-center RPM). It's possible to do those settings manually by tweaking /etc/fonts/fonts.conf or ~/.fonts.conf, but it's a XML file with arcane syntax... You can try to remove any ~/.fonts.conf if you have any and see if that makes a difference. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] using Linux as a NAS / SAN device
Hi, I'm looking at using Linux as a NAS / SAN device, and would like some input from other's who have done this before? How would it compare to commercial SAN devices, Thecus N8800SAS (http://www.thecus.com/products_over.php?cid=11pid=177set_language=english) or something similar to these? I would probably use hardware RAID 10, and could go with either SAS / SATA, and then probably offer iSCSI, Samba. NFS rsync. In terms of servers hardware, well either Tyan / SuperMicro / Intel / Dell would be fine as well. But, my question is rather from a linux point of view, how would Linux compare to dedicated NAS devices, in terms of the OS managing the device? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Hosting Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using Linux as a NAS / SAN device
At Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:12:27 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hi, I'm looking at using Linux as a NAS / SAN device, and would like some input from other's who have done this before? How would it compare to commercial SAN devices, Thecus N8800SAS (http://www.thecus.com/products_over.php?cid=11pid=177set_language=english) or something similar to these? I would probably use hardware RAID 10, and could go with either SAS / SATA, and then probably offer iSCSI, Samba. NFS rsync. In terms of servers hardware, well either Tyan / SuperMicro / Intel / Dell would be fine as well. But, my question is rather from a linux point of view, how would Linux compare to dedicated NAS devices, in terms of the OS managing the device? I think many dedicated NAS devices, are in fact Linux machines, using an embedded Linux system. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using Linux as a NAS / SAN device
Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi, I'm looking at using Linux as a NAS / SAN device, and would like some input from other's who have done this before? I've bought two SAN devices in the past couple years, both run Debian and both are tier 1 enterprise storage arrays. Of course you wouldn't know they ran Debian or linux unless you tried to telnet to them on port 22 and saw the SSH banner. http://www.3par.com/inservtclass/ My active-active NAS head units runs CentOS 4.4 on IBM hardware (back end disk storage provided by above array) http://www.exanet.com/default.asp?contentID=209 How would it compare to commercial SAN devices, Thecus N8800SAS (http://www.thecus.com/products_over.php?cid=11pid=177set_language=english) or something similar to these? I would probably use hardware RAID 10, and could go with either SAS / SATA, and then probably offer iSCSI, Samba. NFS rsync. In terms of servers hardware, well either Tyan / SuperMicro / Intel / Dell would be fine as well. But, my question is rather from a linux point of view, how would Linux compare to dedicated NAS devices, in terms of the OS managing the device? If you use a purpose-built appliance OS it should be pretty comparable, e.g. openfiler or freenas(bsd based?) to something like a Thecus. I used openfiler about 1.5 years ago mostly for iSCSI and it worked ok, at one point had 4 shelves of HP MSA SCSI disk drives attached to it each connected to dedicated RAID cards on an older HP DL585. I'm looking to get a Thecus N770 myself pretty soon, mainly for the smaller integrated form factor with many drive bays. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
