Re: [CentOS-virt] Which is the best network interface to use.
The virtual network is great for connecting two or more virtual guests directly. Its fast and doesn't add traffic to your physical lan. If you have a virtual guest that gets a lot of traffic, then giving it its own network card (nic) can help speed things up as well as keep the heavy traffic away from the virtual guests and your users - those that don't need to be fighting against a steady stream of packets. The more nics the better. I tend to use three because I occasionally move large amounts of files, and I don't want to slow down other things on the lan. A decent gigabit switch means never having to share the bandwidth. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] posteos en nuestra lista
Buen día Favor amigos, cuando envíen mails a la lista pongan algo más claro las descripciones de su problema, opinión, ó información a compartir. Ej poner simplemente HELP en la línea de asunto hace que muchos de nosotros pasemos por alto dichos mensajes. Saludos -- David Polanco Colombia ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] HELP
Hola compañeros tengo un problema con la tarjeta red del servidor MG110 G6 que no me responde el ping desde otros equipos y ni da ping a ningun equipo. La informacion que me piden es la siguiente: 1. La targeta funciona y el ethtool entrega la siguiente informacion Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: No Speed: 100Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: off Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x0003 (51) Link detected: no 2. No emite trafico. 3. La configuracion de red esta bien. Les agradesco la atencion prestada. El 05/11/10, Miguel Angel Murcia Palacio murciaan...@gmail.com escribió: Message: 1 Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2010 Subject: Instalcion de tarjeta de red servidor mg110 g6 Hola compañeros tengo un problema con la tarjeta red del servidor MG110 G6 que no me responde el ping y ni da ping a otros equipos. Que me pueden sugerir para poder resolver este problema. Muchas gracias en lo que me puedan ayudar Att. Ing. Miguel A. Murcia Miguel, necesitamos un poco de información sobre tu sistema: -La tarjeta funciona? La herramienta ethtool dice que tiene link? -Emite tráfico, el switch muestra actividad cuando lanzas un ping? -Está correctamente configurada la placa? La dirección de red corresponde a la red donde está situada? La máscara es la correcta? -No funciona nada, o tampoco andan las demás aplicaciones de red? Puedes hacer ssh a otro equipo, o navegar? -El ping no funciona contra ningún otro equipo, o existen equipos donde sí? -Hay reglas de iptables que estén filtrando ICMP? Probaste a eliminar las reglas de iptables? ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] HELP
2010/11/7 Miguel Angel Murcia Palacio murciaan...@gmail.com: Hola compañeros tengo un problema con la tarjeta red del servidor MG110 G6 que no me responde el ping desde otros equipos y ni da ping a ningun equipo. La informacion que me piden es la siguiente: 1. La targeta funciona y el ethtool entrega la siguiente informacion Link detected: no 2. No emite trafico. Entonces revisa la cuestión física antes que nada. Link detected: no indica que no hay nada del otro lado del cable. Los bits que salgan de tu placa caerán al vacío y sufrirán una muerte horrible. Fíjate si alguna de las puntas no está floja o mal armada, prueba con otro cable, con otra boca del switch, asegúrate de que el switch está encendido, de que la boca no está anulada, etc. -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] replica de servidor Openldap
Bueno perdón por el error de sintaxis la ubicación exacta es: /etc/openldap/slapd.conf y si es un CentOS 5.5 bien actualizado al día de hoy Saludos El 05/11/10 17:07, Renato Covarrubias escribió: Que rara la ubicación del archivo de configuración. Es un CentOS? Ya viste que te dice el log de slapd?? El 03/11/2010 15:20, Alejandro Marin Maturanoama...@impi.gob.mx escribió: Hola compañeros tengo un problema ya que he implementado dos servidores Openldap con samba, segun esto para que esten replicados, pero mi problema radica en si hago un cambio en mi master el escalvo no refleja dicho cambio que se supone debe hacer automaticamente. les pongo mi configuracion 1.- Servidor master direccion IP 192.168.12.1 archivo /etc/openldap.slapd.conf replica host=192.168.12.2:389 binddn=cn=Manager,dc=midominio,dc=com bindmethod=simple credentials=CONTRASEÃ_PLANA replogfile /var/lib/ldap/master-slapd.replog.log 2.- Servidor esclavo direccion IP 192.168.12.2 archivo /etc/openldap.slapd.conf updatedn cn=Manager,dc=midominio,dc=com updateref ldap://192.168.12.1 -- ___ /\ Alejandro Marin Maturano \ \_| Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial | | Coordinación Departamental de Soporte Técnico | | http://www.impi.gob.mx | | Arenal No.550, Piso 3, Col. Tepepan | | México D.F. 53340400 ext. 10083 | | |_ \_/_/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] funciona los repositorios de centos en RHEL 4 ?
Mi pregunta es la siguiente a alguna forma o manera de usar los repositorios de centos en una RHEL4 de ser asi les agradeceria su colaboracio -- Julio Cèsar Carballo Lòpez Administrador de Red Instituto de Geografìa Tropical Debian GNU/Linux User Linux Registered User: 477739 Telef: (537) 832/3494 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] HELP
Miguel. Revisa tu archivo resolv (/etc/resolv.conf, que tengas los o el servidor de nombres que cumple ese rol), revisa las rutas (route -n) en los equipos que funciona y en el que te esta generando el inconveniente, revisa que tu mascara y gateway esten igual al de los equipos de la red que si funcionan. Nos cuentas de tus avances en el tema. Saludos, Carlos R!. El 8 de noviembre de 2010 07:40, Eduardo Grosclaude eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com escribió: 2010/11/7 Miguel Angel Murcia Palacio murciaan...@gmail.com: Hola compañeros tengo un problema con la tarjeta red del servidor MG110 G6 que no me responde el ping desde otros equipos y ni da ping a ningun equipo. La informacion que me piden es la siguiente: 1. La targeta funciona y el ethtool entrega la siguiente informacion Link detected: no 2. No emite trafico. Entonces revisa la cuestión física antes que nada. Link detected: no indica que no hay nada del otro lado del cable. Los bits que salgan de tu placa caerán al vacío y sufrirán una muerte horrible. Fíjate si alguna de las puntas no está floja o mal armada, prueba con otro cable, con otra boca del switch, asegúrate de que el switch está encendido, de que la boca no está anulada, etc. -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Carlos Restrepo M. Administrador de Sistemas Profesional Linux LPI 101 - 102 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] funciona los repositorios de centos en RHEL4 ?
On 11/08/2010 10:38 AM, Julio Cesar wrote: Mi pregunta es la siguiente a alguna forma o manera de usar los repositorios de centos en una RHEL4 de ser asi les agradeceria su colaboracio hola sí, funcionan, instala el paquete yum de centos en tu redhat. Y quizá te pida instalar algunos paquetes más. También instala el paquete centos-release* (y los que te pida) es algo medio simple.. una vez le logres instalar a ambos, procedes normalmente con yum saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] funciona los repositorios de centos en RHEL4 ?
rpm yum luego añade los repos en /etc/yum.repo/centos.repo Yo lo tengo trabajando en RHEL beta6 y funciona con dag , rpmfusion, etc slds 2010/11/8 Julio Cesar jce...@geotech.cu Mi pregunta es la siguiente a alguna forma o manera de usar los repositorios de centos en una RHEL4 de ser asi les agradeceria su colaboracio -- Julio Cèsar Carballo Lòpez Administrador de Red Instituto de Geografìa Tropical Debian GNU/Linux User Linux Registered User: 477739 Telef: (537) 832/3494 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Gino Francisco Alania Hurtado NITCOM Labs ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] funciona los repositorios de centos en RHEL4 ?
No, el tomara los de CentOS 4. El 8 de noviembre de 2010 13:07, Julio Cesar jce...@geotech.cu escribió: On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:54:21 -0500, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@nuestroserver.com wrote: On 11/08/2010 10:38 AM, Julio Cesar wrote: Mi pregunta es la siguiente a alguna forma o manera de usar los repositorios de centos en una RHEL4 de ser asi les agradeceria su colaboracio hola sí, funcionan, instala el paquete yum de centos en tu redhat. Y quizá te pida instalar algunos paquetes más. También instala el paquete centos-release* (y los que te pida) es algo medio simple.. una vez le logres instalar a ambos, procedes normalmente con yum saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es mi pregunta es la sigueinte me sirve los repos de centos 5.5 a mi RHEL4 ? gracias -- Julio Cèsar Carballo Lòpez Administrador de Red Instituto de Geografìa Tropical Debian GNU/Linux User Linux Registered User: 477739 Telef: (537) 832/3494 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Carlos Restrepo M. Administrador de Sistemas Profesional Linux LPI 101 - 102 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] funciona los repositorios de centos en RHEL4 ?
mi pregunta es la sigueinte me sirve los repos de centos 5.5 a mi RHEL4 ? no, como mismo tampoco funcionan en centos-4. pero puedes usar los repos de centos-4 para tu rhel4. gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de u n servidor web)
Eduardo te comento que hoy estuvea full con el Apache!!! me está gustando Linux cuando empezás a entender como funciona es un mundo rarísimo y me gusta eso es bueno. Gente de Centos les comento que en el día de hoy pude subir mi pequeña página (un index.html) al navegador es por ello que estoy contento. Ahora estoy tratando de configurar el Bind DNS Server para que la vea todo el mundo mi página jajajaja pero me surge una duda: Que despuésde subir el yum install bind y ver que tengo instalado el bind -9.3.6-4 voy a buscar el archivo en la carpeta /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf #para configurarlo y no está ¿puede haber un error? ¿qué dns server me recomiendan? ¿tuve una buena elección con Bind? Muchas gracias Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: devot...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:37:08 -0300 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Buenísimo, ya lo hice... ahora a leer se ha dicho. Muchas gracias!!! Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:29:09 -0300 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es]Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) 2010/11/7 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com: Gracias Eduardo por tu atención, te cuento que estuve ya viendo el terminal en GNOME me gustó aunque me da un poco de miedo como te dije, acabo de instalar Apache y encontré este curso para leer: Creo que sería el primer paso para llegar a mi servidor web ¿verdad? http://www.cesareox.com/docencia/dfsi/servidor_web.html A ese documento no te viene mal darle una mirada, pero como te dijimos anteriormente, no te alejes de la documentación oficial de la distro, porque te podés encontrar comandos que no existen, que se manejan en forma diferente, que llevan archivos de configuración en otros lados, etc. En particular Apache es un paquete que varía bastante de versión en versión y entre diferentes packagers. En una consola, como root, poné yum install Deployment_Guide-es-ES Y luego de esto tendrás la guía principal en la zona de Sistema/Documentación. Ahí tenés la guía autorizada para configurar Apache en CentOS (e infinidad de otras cosas). -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de u n servidor web)
ok, acabo de probar y me da un error te lo pongo: Setting up install ProcessNo package bin-chroot available.Nothing to do. Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:36:26 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Debes Instalar también el paquete bind-chroot para la arquitectura que tengas (x86 o x86_64). Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.combind-chroot. Eduardo te comento que hoy estuvea full con el Apache!!! me está gustando Linux cuando empezás a entender como funciona es un mundo rarísimo y me gusta eso es bueno. Gente de Centos les comento que en el día de hoy pude subir mi pequeña página (un index.html) al navegador es por ello que estoy contento. Ahora estoy tratando de configurar el Bind DNS Server para que la vea todo el mundo mi página jajajaja pero me surge una duda: Que despuésde subir el yum install bind y ver que tengo instalado el bind -9.3.6-4 voy a buscar el archivo en la carpeta /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf #para configurarlo y no está ¿puede haber un error? ¿qué dns server me recomiendan? ¿tuve una buena elección con Bind? Muchas gracias Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: devot...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:37:08 -0300 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Buenísimo, ya lo hice... ahora a leer se ha dicho. Muchas gracias!!! Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:29:09 -0300 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es]Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) 2010/11/7 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com: Gracias Eduardo por tu atención, te cuento que estuve ya viendo el terminal en GNOME me gustó aunque me da un poco de miedo como te dije, acabo de instalar Apache y encontré este curso para leer: Creo que sería el primer paso para llegar a mi servidor web ¿verdad? http://www.cesareox.com/docencia/dfsi/servidor_web.html A ese documento no te viene mal darle una mirada, pero como te dijimos anteriormente, no te alejes de la documentación oficial de la distro, porque te podés encontrar comandos que no existen, que se manejan en forma diferente, que llevan archivos de configuración en otros lados, etc. En particular Apache es un paquete que varía bastante de versión en versión y entre diferentes packagers. En una consola, como root, poné yum install Deployment_Guide-es-ES Y luego de esto tendrás la guía principal en la zona de Sistema/Documentación. Ahí tenés la guía autorizada para configurar Apache en CentOS (e infinidad de otras cosas). -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de u n servidor web)
busca el paquete primero con la siguiente insrtuccion: yum search bind Asi visualizaras los paquetes que contienen bind luego de visualizar el paquete de tu arquitectura digitas: yum install bind-chroot.i386 o yum install bind-chroot.x86_64 Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com ok, acabo de probar y me da un error te lo pongo: Setting up install ProcessNo package bin-chroot available.Nothing to do. Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:36:26 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web)bind-chroot Debes Instalar también el paquete para la arquitectura que tengas (x86 o x86_64). Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.combind-chroot. Eduardo te comento que hoy estuvea full con el Apache!!! me está gustando Linux cuando empezás a entender como funciona es un mundo rarísimo y me gusta eso es bueno. Gente de Centos les comento que en el día de hoy pude subir mi pequeña página (un index.html) al navegador es por ello que estoy contento. Ahora estoy tratando de configurar el Bind DNS Server para que la vea todo el mundo mi página jajajaja pero me surge una duda: Que despuésde subir el yum install bind y ver que tengo instalado el bind -9.3.6-4 voy a buscar el archivo en la carpeta /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf #para configurarlo y no está ¿puede haber un error? ¿qué dns server me recomiendan? ¿tuve una buena elección con Bind? Muchas gracias Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: devot...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:37:08 -0300 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Buenísimo, ya lo hice... ahora a leer se ha dicho. Muchas gracias!!!bind-chroot Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:29:09 -0300 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es]Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) 2010/11/7 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com: Gracias Eduardo por tu atención, te cuento que estuve ya viendo el terminal en GNOME me gustó aunque me da un poco de miedo como te dije, acabo de instalar Apache y encontré este curso para leer: Creo que sería el primer paso para llegar a mi servidor web ¿verdad? http://www.cesareox.com/docencia/dfsi/servidor_web.html A ese documento no te viene mal darle una mirada, pero como te dijimos anteriormente, no te alejes de la documentación oficial de la distro, porque te podés encontrar comandos que no existen, que se manejan en forma diferente, que llevan archivos de configuración en otros lados, etc. En particular Apache es un paquete que varía bastante de versión en versión y entre diferentes packagers. En una consola, como root, poné yum install Deployment_Guide-es-ES Y luego de esto tendrás la guía principal en la zona de Sistema/Documentación. Ahí tenés la guía autorizada para configurar Apache en CentOS (e infinidad de otras cosas). -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de u n servidor web)
Carlos: Con la primera opción me dice:que está instalado en la última versión... Y la segunda: No package bind-chroot.i386_64 available. ¿tendré que agregarlo a mano? http://www.ecualug.org/2007/06/24/comos/configurar_un_servidor_dns_con_bind_en_centos5 ¿Es confiable? ¿qué decís? Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) busca el paquete primero con la siguiente insrtuccion: yum search bind Asi visualizaras los paquetes que contienen bind luego de visualizar el paquete de tu arquitectura digitas: yum install bind-chroot.i386 o yum install bind-chroot.x86_64 Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com ok, acabo de probar y me da un error te lo pongo: Setting up install ProcessNo package bin-chroot available.Nothing to do. Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:36:26 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web)bind-chroot Debes Instalar también el paquete para la arquitectura que tengas (x86 o x86_64). Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.combind-chroot. Eduardo te comento que hoy estuvea full con el Apache!!! me está gustando Linux cuando empezás a entender como funciona es un mundo rarísimo y me gusta eso es bueno. Gente de Centos les comento que en el día de hoy pude subir mi pequeña página (un index.html) al navegador es por ello que estoy contento. Ahora estoy tratando de configurar el Bind DNS Server para que la vea todo el mundo mi página jajajaja pero me surge una duda: Que despuésde subir el yum install bind y ver que tengo instalado el bind -9.3.6-4 voy a buscar el archivo en la carpeta /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf #para configurarlo y no está ¿puede haber un error? ¿qué dns server me recomiendan? ¿tuve una buena elección con Bind? Muchas gracias Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: devot...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:37:08 -0300 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Buenísimo, ya lo hice... ahora a leer se ha dicho. Muchas gracias!!!bind-chroot Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:29:09 -0300 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es]Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) 2010/11/7 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com: Gracias Eduardo por tu atención, te cuento que estuve ya viendo el terminal en GNOME me gustó aunque me da un poco de miedo como te dije, acabo de instalar Apache y encontré este curso para leer: Creo que sería el primer paso para llegar a mi servidor web ¿verdad? http://www.cesareox.com/docencia/dfsi/servidor_web.html A ese documento no te viene mal darle una mirada, pero como te dijimos anteriormente, no te alejes de la documentación oficial de la distro, porque te podés encontrar comandos que no existen, que se manejan en forma diferente, que llevan archivos de configuración en otros lados, etc. En particular Apache es un paquete que varía bastante de versión en versión y entre diferentes packagers. En una consola, como root, poné yum install Deployment_Guide-es-ES Y luego de esto tendrás la guía principal en la zona de Sistema/Documentación. Ahí tenés la guía autorizada para configurar Apache en CentOS (e infinidad de otras cosas). -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org
[CentOS-es] Modelo de named.conf /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf
Hola amigos del foro, quería saber si alguien tiene un modelo de éste archivo para pasarme del BInd porque al instalarlo no me aparece en esa ruta yo nose si editarlo manualmente o ver si de alguna otra forma lo puedo instalar porque supongo que si no se instaló fue por algo. Tengo la versión 5.5 versión 32 bit centos. Gracias por su tiempo Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de u n servidor web)
Lucas, el paquete que te suministra el archivo que necesitas parametizar es el bind-chroot. prueba este comando para verificar si el paquete bind-chroot esta instalado: rpm -qa |grep bind la salida de ese comado debe mostrarte que esta instalado el bind.i386 (si tu arquitectura es de 32) o bind.x86_64 (si es de 64 bits) y ademas mostraria el bind-chroot, si no lo muestra debes instalarlo con el siguiente comando: yum install bind-chroot -y adicionalmente te aclaro que la instrucción: yum search nombre del paquete te dice si el paquete esta disponible en los repositorios, pero no dice si esta instalado. Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com Carlos: Con la primera opción me dice:que está instalado en la última versión... Y la segunda: No package bind-chroot.i386_64 available. ¿tendré que agregarlo a mano? http://www.ecualug.org/2007/06/24/comos/configurar_un_servidor_dns_con_bind_en_centos5 ¿Es confiable? ¿qué decís? Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) busca el paquete primero con la siguiente insrtuccion: yum search bind Asi visualizaras los paquetes que contienen bind luego de visualizar el paquete de tu arquitectura digitas: yum install bind-chroot.i386 o yum install bind-chroot.x86_64 Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com ok, acabo de probar y me da un error te lo pongo: Setting up install ProcessNo package bin-chroot available.Nothing to do. Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:36:26 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web)bind-chroot Debes Instalar también el paquete para la arquitectura que tengas (x86 o x86_64). Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.combind-chroot. Eduardo te comento que hoy estuvea full con el Apache!!! me está gustando Linux cuando empezás a entender como funciona es un mundo rarísimo y me gusta eso es bueno. Gente de Centos les comento que en el día de hoy pude subir mi pequeña página (un index.html) al navegador es por ello que estoy contento. Ahora estoy tratando de configurar el Bind DNS Server para que la vea todo el mundo mi página jajajaja pero me surge una duda: Que despuésde subir el yum install bind y ver que tengo instalado el bind -9.3.6-4 voy a buscar el archivo en la carpeta /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf #para configurarlo y no está ¿puede haber un error? ¿qué dns server me recomiendan? ¿tuve una buena elección con Bind? Muchas gracias Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: devot...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:37:08 -0300 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Buenísimo, ya lo hice... ahora a leer se ha dicho. Muchas gracias!!!bind-chroot Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:29:09 -0300 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es]Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) 2010/11/7 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com: Gracias Eduardo por tu atención, te cuento que estuve ya viendo el terminal en GNOME me gustó aunque me da un poco de miedo como te dije, acabo de instalar Apache y encontré este curso para leer: Creo que sería el primer paso para llegar a mi servidor web ¿verdad? http://www.cesareox.com/docencia/dfsi/servidor_web.html A ese documento no te viene mal darle una mirada, pero como te dijimos anteriormente, no te alejes de la documentación oficial de la distro, porque te podés encontrar comandos que no existen, que se manejan en
Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de u n servidor web)
Si, ese archivo lo tengo. En ese caso ¿qué se hace? uso este archivo el named.caching Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 From: eduardo.ate...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:54:48 -0300 Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) named.caching-nameserver.conf -- From: Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:41 PM To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Corrí el comando: [r...@prueba ~]# rpm -qa |grep bind bind-libs-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 bind-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 bind-utils-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 system-config-bind-4.0.3-4.el5.centos ypbind-1.19-12.el5 bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2 Está instalado el chroot... pero sigue sin aparecer el archivo named.conf... Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:34:23 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) Lucas, el paquete que te suministra el archivo que necesitas parametizar es el bind-chroot. prueba este comando para verificar si el paquete bind-chroot esta instalado: rpm -qa |grep bind la salida de ese comado debe mostrarte que esta instalado el bind.i386 (si tu arquitectura es de 32) o bind.x86_64 (si es de 64 bits) y ademas mostraria el bind-chroot, si no lo muestra debes instalarlo con el siguiente comando: yum install bind-chroot -y adicionalmente te aclaro que la instrucción: yum search nombre del paquete te dice si el paquete esta disponible en los repositorios, pero no dice si esta instalado. Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com Carlos: Con la primera opción me dice:que está instalado en la última versión... Y la segunda: No package bind-chroot.i386_64 available. ¿tendré que agregarlo a mano? http://www.ecualug.org/2007/06/24/comos/configurar_un_servidor_dns_con_bind_en_centos5 ¿Es confiable? ¿qué decís? Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:02:41 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web) busca el paquete primero con la siguiente insrtuccion: yum search bind Asi visualizaras los paquetes que contienen bind luego de visualizar el paquete de tu arquitectura digitas: yum install bind-chroot.i386 o yum install bind-chroot.x86_64 Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.com ok, acabo de probar y me da un error te lo pongo: Setting up install ProcessNo package bin-chroot available.Nothing to do. Lucas Demián Smud Oficina de Soporte Técnico y Administración de Servidores Devoto PC Devoto, Capital Federal Cel.: 15 4025 6471 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:36:26 -0500 From: restrcar...@gmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Novato en Centos (instalación de un servidor web)bind-chroot Debes Instalar también el paquete para la arquitectura que tengas (x86 o x86_64). Saludos. Carlos R. 2010/11/8 Lucas Smud devot...@hotmail.combind-chroot. Eduardo te comento que hoy estuvea full con el Apache!!! me está gustando Linux cuando empezás a entender como funciona es un mundo rarísimo y me gusta eso es bueno. Gente de Centos les comento que en el día de hoy pude subir mi pequeña página (un index.html) al navegador es por ello que estoy contento. Ahora estoy tratando de configurar el Bind DNS Server para que la vea todo el mundo mi página jajajaja pero me surge una duda: Que despuésde subir el yum install bind y ver que tengo instalado el bind -9.3.6-4 voy a buscar el archivo en la carpeta /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf #para configurarlo y no está ¿puede haber un error? ¿qué dns server me recomiendan? ¿tuve una buena elección con Bind? Muchas gracias
[CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? maybe somebody would share their experience about this setup ? any links would be good. postfix 2.6.7 dovecot 2.0.6 centos 5.x webmin + virtualmin thank you. -- http://blog.rizahnst.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 23:19, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote: To amplify this just a little bit, by the rules of IP routing, every machine must: A) Have a unique address. B) Be attached to the proper subnet for that address as defined by the local netmask. Once those are true, there exists a unique route between any two machines connected to the network, or the Internet. Both those conditions are met in this use case, however the machine in question is on two networks: |--Network1--|--Network2--| ACB A: router on the wireless network B: router on the wired network C: CentOS laptop Each router has a unique address on it's own network, as per spec. The laptop is connected to two networks, on two different interfaces. The networks were never designed to be connected, and in fact there is no connection between them. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NAT is what C would do to let a computer on Network1 access a resource on Network2. C would be the gateway, rerouting packets between the two networks and correcting for address used on both sides. However, I am not trying to create a gateway! In this case, C itself (as a workstation) needs to access resources on both networks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface
On 8 November 2010 09:34, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote: Both those conditions are met in this use case, however the machine in question is on two networks: |--Network1--|--Network2--| A C B A: router on the wireless network B: router on the wired network C: CentOS laptop Dotan, CentOS, Ubuntu or Windows, it does not matter. You cannot access both networks at the same time unless you bridge them and even then you can only have the machines with unique addresses. You did say that you're not interested in one of the networks when accessing the other one. Simply pull down your wifi network (ifconfig wlan down), delete the arp entry (see arp -d), and then try accessing the 2nd IP again. This is how TCP/IP works, it's composed of networks and within a network you can only have a machine with a unique IP address. NAT hides the 2nd network and you can set up forward rules to access behind the NAT. That's why we have been mentioning NAT. -- Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface
From: Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com This is on the Internet-connected interface: wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:18:de:98:c7:34 inet addr:192.168.0.26 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::218:deff:fe98:c734/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:114879 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:78945 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:104017653 (104.0 MB) TX bytes:11292782 (11.2 MB) And this is on the LAN-connected interface: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:c5:c8:13:d1 inet addr:192.168.0.101 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::215:c5ff:fec8:13d1/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1921474 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:8322288 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:146445850 (146.4 MB) TX bytes:3479224403 (3.4 GB) Interrupt:17 Not sure if it will work but worth the try... If wlan0 is only for the internet (so no 192.168.x.y destinations), have a default gateway pointing to wlan0. Then have the 192.168.0.0 point to eth0. Something like: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 wlan0 JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On 08/11/10 08:30, ahmad riza h nst wrote: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? maybe somebody would share their experience about this setup ? any links would be good. postfix 2.6.7 dovecot 2.0.6 centos 5.x webmin + virtualmin thank you. Other that centos 5.x, none of the rest is shipped by CentOS so you're unlikely to get much help here. Also, please don't cross post the same question to multiple lists - you have an active thread on the postfix users list and most postfix users on this list will also be subscribed there too. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface
Dotan Cohen wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 23:19, Bob McConnell rmcco...@lightlink.com wrote: To amplify this just a little bit, by the rules of IP routing, every machine must: A) Have a unique address. B) Be attached to the proper subnet for that address as defined by the local netmask. Once those are true, there exists a unique route between any two machines connected to the network, or the Internet. Both those conditions are met in this use case, however the machine in question is on two networks: |--Network1--|--Network2--| ACB A: router on the wireless network B: router on the wired network C: CentOS laptop Each router has a unique address on it's own network, as per spec. The laptop is connected to two networks, on two different interfaces. The networks were never designed to be connected, and in fact there is no connection between them. But by dual homing your laptop on the two subnets simultaneously, you are breaking those rules. Neither the subnets nor the host address are unique any longer from the laptop's perspective. It sees two identical subnets with different routes but cannot reliably determine which subnet any particular process is trying to reach. In fact, it may even try to send packets for one socket out the other port when the first port is busy, thinking it actually has multiple routes to the same subnet. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NAT is what C would do to let a computer on Network1 access a resource on Network2. C would be the gateway, rerouting packets between the two networks and correcting for address used on both sides. No, NAT would simply change the apparent addresses on Network2 to a space that doesn't conflict with Network1. C is the only common point and it should never be routing packets between those networks. However, I am not trying to create a gateway! In this case, C itself (as a workstation) needs to access resources on both networks. Yes, you are trying to create a gateway for your laptop. You need a router between C and one of the two networks with NAT capabilities so that your laptop will see a unique path to each subnet. i.e. |--Network1--|--wlan0-.-eth0--|--NAT--|--Network2--| A CB Now, this could be as simple as a cable router set up for a different LAN subnet, or it could be a VM on your laptop configured as a router. That would produce something more like this. |--Network1--|--wlan0-.-NAT--eth0--|--Network2--| A C B Nothing in Network2 has to change, but the NAT translates those addresses into a space that no longer conflicts with Network1. That restores the uniqueness requirements for your laptop. HTH, Bob McConnell N2SPP ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On 8/11/10 7:30 PM, ahmad riza h nst wrote: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. That shouldn't be a problem. Postfix has had support for this for well over a decade. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? Virtual users with a Postfix/Dovecot installation does not equate to real Linux/shell accounts. If the only service being provided is mail, then there's no reason to create real accounts. maybe somebody would share their experience about this setup ? any links would be good. postfix 2.6.7 dovecot 2.0.6 centos 5.x Is there any particular reason you've chosen these versions? That is, are there specific functions which these versions provide that are not in prior versions? I ask because I'm running these versions in CentOS 5.x: postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.i386 dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5.i386 If the only concern is security updates, these are backported to the current versions in CentOS. webmin + virtualmin I've had no experience with either of these as I edit the config files with a text editor. Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x371AC5BFA04AE313 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org wrote: On 8/11/10 7:30 PM, ahmad riza h nst wrote: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. That shouldn't be a problem. Postfix has had support for this for well over a decade. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? Virtual users with a Postfix/Dovecot installation does not equate to real Linux/shell accounts. If the only service being provided is mail, then there's no reason to create real accounts. Ben, the problem is we would use webmin + virtualmin as an interface for costumers to manage their domain (mainly emails) on the server and virtualmin don't use/support mysql + vpopmail yet, at least that what i understand at this moment. virtualmin choose to use unix system user with postfix, so if i create an email then it create one unix system user too, this is what i'm concern, since i don't have any information about what happen to linux/centos if these unix system user growing bigger and bigger to reach some thousands users for an example. maybe somebody would share their experience about this setup ? any links would be good. postfix 2.6.7 dovecot 2.0.6 centos 5.x Is there any particular reason you've chosen these versions? That is, are there specific functions which these versions provide that are not in prior versions? I ask because I'm running these versions in CentOS 5.x: postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.i386 dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5.i386 If the only concern is security updates, these are backported to the current versions in CentOS. no particular reason, i just new to postfix, currently i'm qmail + vpopmail admin. i read on postfix and dovecot website about latest stable release and i installed from source :) i know that centos have postfix + dovecot + mysql as a rpm package. webmin + virtualmin I've had no experience with either of these as I edit the config files with a text editor. these webmin + virtualmin mainly for user interface to manage their domain on the server (just like control panel on hosting server) Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x371AC5BFA04AE313 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- http://blog.rizahnst.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Antwort: Re: large numbers of linux system user for postfix
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote on 08.11.2010 13:54:15: ahmad riza h nst rizah...@gmail.com Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org 08.11.2010 13:54 Bitte antworten an CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org An CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Kopie Thema Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org wrote: On 8/11/10 7:30 PM, ahmad riza h nst wrote: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. That shouldn't be a problem. Postfix has had support for this for well over a decade. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? Virtual users with a Postfix/Dovecot installation does not equate to real Linux/shell accounts. If the only service being provided is mail, then there's no reason to create real accounts. Ben, the problem is we would use webmin + virtualmin as an interface for costumers to manage their domain (mainly emails) on the server and virtualmin don't use/support mysql + vpopmail yet, at least that what i understand at this moment. virtualmin choose to use unix system user with postfix, so if i create an email then it create one unix system user too, this is what i'm concern, since i don't have any information about what happen to linux/centos if these unix system user growing bigger and bigger to reach some thousands users for an example. maybe somebody would share their experience about this setup ? any links would be good. postfix 2.6.7 dovecot 2.0.6 centos 5.x Is there any particular reason you've chosen these versions? That is, are there specific functions which these versions provide that are not in prior versions? I ask because I'm running these versions in CentOS 5.x: postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2.i386 dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5.i386 If the only concern is security updates, these are backported to the current versions in CentOS. no particular reason, i just new to postfix, currently i'm qmail + vpopmail admin. i read on postfix and dovecot website about latest stable release and i installed from source :) i know that centos have postfix + dovecot + mysql as a rpm package. webmin + virtualmin I've had no experience with either of these as I edit the config files with a text editor. these webmin + virtualmin mainly for user interface to manage their domain on the server (just like control panel on hosting server) Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x371AC5BFA04AE313 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- http://blog.rizahnst.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, for those setups I dont't use webmin and usermin. I have only 1 user (vmail) und the administration of all domains, user I'm doing with postfixadmin. Regards, Andreas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin crashes on full screen
Greg Bailey wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: Hi List. doing my weekly updates with yum last night installed kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus and flash-plugin.i386 10.1.102.64-release now today as I go to watch a movie from hulu.com it crashes the flash-plugin whenever I try to go full screen. Anyone else notice this behaviour? I guess I'll try to downgrade flash and see if that fixes the problem. TIA I noticed in the announcement at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2010-November/msg4.html the following quote: During testing, it was discovered that there were regressions with Flash Player on certain sites, such as fullscreen playback on YouTube. Despite these regressions, we feel these security flaws are serious enough to update the package with what Adobe has provided. thanks Greg - I moved to an earlier version - as I have no TV I want to see a movie full screen. -Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos attachment: rkampen.vcf___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin crashes on full screen
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:08:42 -0500 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus (...) I noticed in the announcement at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2010-November/msg4.html (...) thanks Greg - I moved to an earlier version - as I have no TV I want to see a movie full screen. Hi, BTW. Flash x64 was not reported to evince the same problems. I checked it yesterday on Redhat and Adobe pages. Scientific Linux x64 I use (100% CentOS) works excellent with Java x64 and 64 bit Flash. I had a few Flash crashes under Firefox with heavy loads - dozens of pages opened - as x64 version is in experimental phase but I wish i386 was equally stable! But, 1) I have 15 monitor and I rarely switched on full screen modes; 2) hulu.com does not provide its services for users outside the USA - so I wasn't able to check the specific site. Regards -- Please do NOT Cc me on Mailing Lists Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl pgpPHJHejPTWN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin crashes on full screen
On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl wrote: On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:08:42 -0500 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus (...) I noticed in the announcement at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2010-November/msg4.html (...) thanks Greg - I moved to an earlier version - as I have no TV I want to see a movie full screen. Hi, BTW. Flash x64 was not reported to evince the same problems. I checked it yesterday on Redhat and Adobe pages. Scientific Linux x64 I use (100% CentOS) works excellent with Java x64 and 64 bit Flash. I tried this but July swf fails so I had to go back to i386. I had a few Flash crashes under Firefox with heavy loads - dozens of pages opened - as x64 version is in experimental phase but I wish i386 was equally stable! But, 1) I have 15 monitor and I rarely switched on full screen modes; 2) hulu.com does not provide its services for users outside the USA - so I wasn't able to check the specific site. Regards -- Please do NOT Cc me on Mailing Lists Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin crashes on full screen
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:55:30 -0500 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl wrote: On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:08:42 -0500 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus (...) I noticed in the announcement at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2010-November/msg4.html (...) thanks Greg - I moved to an earlier version - as I have no TV I want to see a movie full screen. Hi, BTW. Flash x64 was not reported to evince the same problems. I checked it yesterday on Redhat and Adobe pages. Scientific Linux x64 I use (100% CentOS) works excellent with Java x64 and 64 bit Flash. I tried this but July swf fails so I had to go back to i386. Hi, I use Flash from Sept 27th just as it is offered on Adobe website: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html Regards -- Please do NOT Cc me on Mailing Lists Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl pgpz4oJyxYF9g.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a): Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks http://translate.google.cz/translate?js=nprev=_thl=csie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1sl=cstl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.root.cz%2Fclanky%2Flinuxalt-2010-datove-schranky-v-linuxu%2Fact=url see Radek Vokál told the date of issue of RHEL 6 which is scheduled for 10 November this year. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
David Hrbáč wrote: Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a): Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks http://translate.google.cz/translate?js=nprev=_thl=csie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1sl=cstl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.root.cz%2Fclanky%2Flinuxalt-2010-datove-schranky-v-linuxu%2Fact=url see Radek Vokál told the date of issue of RHEL 6 which is scheduled for 10 November this year. DH On Red Hat's home page, it says: Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video webcast. Register now. If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least the CentOS devs have a couple of days to get the FAQ set up to properly respond to the inevitable When will CentOS 6 be out? queries... :) -Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface
On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote: On a CentOS 5.5 laptop (Dell Inspiron, dual boot with a Debian-based distro) I have a cable plugged into eth0 which is on a LAN with no internet connection. Additionally, I connect wirelessly on wlan0 to the internet. Both connections have router on the 192.168.0.1 address. Although I need to stay connected to the wireless router, can I still access the address 192.168.0.1 on the wired interface? Only if you change the ip of one of those routers, then set the default route to the Internet router and set route for 192.168.0.0 to the internal router. All requests for 192.168.0.0 that can't be ARP'd will be routed to the internal router. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:22:55AM -0700, Greg Bailey wrote: Join the Red Hat executive team on November 10th, 2010 for a live video webcast. Register now. If I was a betting person, I'd put my money on November 10... at least the CentOS devs have a couple of days to get the FAQ set up to properly respond to the inevitable When will CentOS 6 be out? queries... :) Greg, I was drinking soda when I read that. I only saved my monitor from damage with my catlike reflexes. Of course, my cat is 14, but he still has the moves. :) Thanks for the morning laugh. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On 8/11/10 11:54 PM, ahmad riza h nst wrote: the problem is we would use webmin + virtualmin as an interface for costumers to manage their domain (mainly emails) on the server and virtualmin don't use/support mysql + vpopmail yet, at least that what i understand at this moment. virtualmin choose to use unix system user with postfix, so if i create an email then it create one unix system user too, this is what i'm concern, since i don't have any information about what happen to linux/centos if these unix system user growing bigger and bigger to reach some thousands users for an example. Assuming that Virtualmin doesn't have support for real virtual users or redirecting to MySQL for that then you have three basic choices: 1a) Use a different management interface for managing the Postfix/Dovecot configuration. 1b) Write your own extension for Virtualmin which provides this functionality (essentially a variation on 1a). 2) Stick with the existing mail server configuration which already works with Webmin and Virtualmin. 3) Create user accounts that do not provide an actual shell account (e.g. /bin/noshell). With the number of domains and users you're looking at, this could be a real problem, especially when the usernames might conflict between different domains. If I were in your position I'd be looking at either 1a or 1b. Regards, Ben -- Ben McGinnes http://www.adversary.org/ Twitter: benmcginnes Systems Administrator, Writer, ICT Consultant Encrypted email preferred - primary OpenPGP/GPG key: 0xA04AE313 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x371AC5BFA04AE313 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:30 AM, ahmad riza h nst wrote: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? maybe somebody would share their experience about this setup ? any links would be good. postfix 2.6.7 dovecot 2.0.6 centos 5.x webmin + virtualmin thank you. -- http://blog.rizahnst.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I run Postfix 2.6.7 in a similar fashion (virtual domains/users/etc) and it works fine on CentOS 5.5 (even with SELinux enabled). Dovecot on the other hand threw up some errors in /var/log/audit/audit.log so I had to make a custom SELinux module to get it to work properly. Other than that you should be set. -Dan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Addressing outgoing connections to a specific interface
On 11/8/2010 3:34 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 23:19, Bob McConnellrmcco...@lightlink.com wrote: To amplify this just a little bit, by the rules of IP routing, every machine must: A) Have a unique address. B) Be attached to the proper subnet for that address as defined by the local netmask. Once those are true, there exists a unique route between any two machines connected to the network, or the Internet. Both those conditions are met in this use case, however the machine in question is on two networks: |--Network1--|--Network2--| ACB You are missing the big picture and the most fundamental thing about internet connectivity and routing. There aren't 2 networks. Everything you can reach is one network. On the public side, unique addresses are enforced because there is a hierarchy of address delegation. On private networks behind NAT you can do anything you want, but it isn't going to work unless you have unique addresses for all reachable destinations. Your problem is an unfortunate consequence of virtually all consumer-type NAT routers using 192.168.0/24 as their default internal subnet. IP protocols use the destination address early in the routing decision to pick the interface to use to send to the next hop. That can't work if you have to send to the same destination address in 2 different places. If you are interested in learning about this, find an IP routing reference that show the address and netmask as binary values. It is very easy to understand when you line up the bits of the addresses and netmasks in binary. A: router on the wireless network B: router on the wired network C: CentOS laptop Each router has a unique address on it's own network, as per spec. No, once these subnets are connected to a common machine, you have one network. But it won't work. The laptop is connected to two networks, on two different interfaces. The networks were never designed to be connected, and in fact there is no connection between them. As soon as your machine connects to both they are connected. Correct me if I'm wrong, but NAT is what C would do to let a computer on Network1 access a resource on Network2. C would be the gateway, rerouting packets between the two networks and correcting for address used on both sides. Yes, but you have to present a unique address for forwarding. An intermediate machine with an intermediate subnet range could nat and present a different address to you, but one machine can't deal with 2 different directly connected destinations with the same address. However, I am not trying to create a gateway! In this case, C itself (as a workstation) needs to access resources on both networks. There's no difference in routing packets that have come from some other machine and routing packets from your own applications. The IP layer that decides where to send the packet for its next hop will look at the destination address and has to be able to figure out which interface to send it out. That's obviously impossible when you have the same address connected to two different interfaces at the same time. There are an assortment of ways to tackle the problem if you can't apply the obvious solution and change the subnet addressing on one side or the other. The simplest might be to run a virtual machine (vmware, virtualbox, etc.) that is bridged to the wireless interface without letting the host itself get an address there. That would maintain the isolation you need between the target addresses. Or, you could arrange for some other connection (vpn or physical) to a machine on the wireless network (even the virtual machine above), where this connection would have it's own unique subnet range. Then you'd be able to use nat or a proxy to get forwarding to the other subnet, hiding the real destination address. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bug or normal?
Not sure if this is normal or some kind of bug that I should be filing somewhere so asking for opinions here first. I have a new system (Gigabyte H55M-UD2H with i5-760) that has 2 disks with partitions used for RAID 1 MD devices. X was in use. After testing that the system would boot properly if one of the disk failed, simulated by pulling the cable on one then rebooting, I proceeded to do other configuration while the system resync the array. Subsequently, I made a mistake selecting the wrong partition to dd an image from another machine's HDD and filled up the md0 device. So I rm the half copied image file which was about 80GB at that time. It took more than the couple of seconds I would expect for rm on a single file. At this point, I realized that apart from being able to move the mouse cursor, the system was not responding to mouse clicks or keyboard. I thought it had locked up for some reason and power cycled the system. The system locked up again during the boot process when the md daemon was loaded, detected an improper shutdown and started syncing one of the array. There was an error message about pdflush:303 time out after 120 seconds and a suggestion on how to suppress the message. It repeated until I gave up and rebooted the machine. Sorry my bad for not noting down the exact error message because I was just going WTF is this? I need this machine up and running within 8hrs! I tried to boot up using the CentOS LiveCD and pretty much ran into the same problem when it tried to find the existing installation. Trying to figure out what is going on, I switched to another bash console and managed to run top. The load was more than 4.x but no single process appear to be heavily utilizing the system. Switching to the debug console, I managed to see that the md daemon was again trying to resync the arrays. There was an EXT3 message about deleting an unreference inode before I got a screenful of what appears to be a trace dump. So my question is, was all that supposed to happen or did I stumble on some bug that arose from the combination of a full md array being resync while rm was trying to remove a very large file? Or was it simply my bad for assuming that rm'ing a large file would take no longer than deleting a single small file and caused some inevitable FS corruption by power cycling thinking that the system had hung? Although that then begs the question of why would a simple rm command load up the system to the point it wouldn't respond to inputs apart from mouse movement? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] flash-plugin crashes on full screen
On Nov 8, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl wrote: On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:55:30 -0500 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Przemysław Pawełczyk pp...@o2.pl wrote: On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:08:42 -0500 Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus (...) I noticed in the announcement at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2010-November/msg4.html (...) thanks Greg - I moved to an earlier version - as I have no TV I want to see a movie full screen. Hi, BTW. Flash x64 was not reported to evince the same problems. I checked it yesterday on Redhat and Adobe pages. Scientific Linux x64 I use (100% CentOS) works excellent with Java x64 and 64 bit Flash. I tried this but July swf fails so I had to go back to i386. Hi, I use Flash from Sept 27th just as it is offered on Adobe website: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html Yeah that's what I used. It was hulu that failed sorry iPhone thought it knew better. I now use the flash from rf as adobe has no downgrade option Regards -- Please do NOT Cc me on Mailing Lists Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org wrote: Assuming that Virtualmin doesn't have support for real virtual users or redirecting to MySQL for that then you have three basic choices: 1a) Use a different management interface for managing the Postfix/Dovecot configuration. 1b) Write your own extension for Virtualmin which provides this functionality (essentially a variation on 1a). 2) Stick with the existing mail server configuration which already works with Webmin and Virtualmin. 3) Create user accounts that do not provide an actual shell account (e.g. /bin/noshell). With the number of domains and users you're looking at, this could be a real problem, especially when the usernames might conflict between different domains. Unless you encode the domain in the username of the unix user. user#domain I quite like the idea of having separate UIDs for each user. Let the OS work for you... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On 11/8/2010 1:20 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Ben McGinnesb...@adversary.org wrote: Assuming that Virtualmin doesn't have support for real virtual users or redirecting to MySQL for that then you have three basic choices: 1a) Use a different management interface for managing the Postfix/Dovecot configuration. 1b) Write your own extension for Virtualmin which provides this functionality (essentially a variation on 1a). 2) Stick with the existing mail server configuration which already works with Webmin and Virtualmin. 3) Create user accounts that do not provide an actual shell account (e.g. /bin/noshell). With the number of domains and users you're looking at, this could be a real problem, especially when the usernames might conflict between different domains. Unless you encode the domain in the username of the unix user. user#domain I quite like the idea of having separate UIDs for each user. Let the OS work for you... Or if you are really concerned about scaling beyond what the OS handles gracefully, you might want to look at cyrus instead of dovecot as the mail backend. I think ClearOS has a web-manged setup, but I'm not sure how they relate email users to system users. -- Les mikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
Hi All, Was wondering if anyone knows there are any separate rpms to be able to install a true bourne shell and not one linked to bash. Thanks in advance, Phil -- Manners are the unenforced standards of conduct which demonstrate that a person is proper, polite, and refined. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
I think no due to Copyright issues. The closest is probably dash which describes itself as a POSIX comptatible shell. Clive ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum -yq --security check-update spouting lots of text?
uname -a Linux 2.6.18-194.17.4.el5.centos.plus #1 SMP Tue Oct 26 04:07:11 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I thought -q meant 'no output'. Recently yum -q has started spewing the following garbage, can anyone tell me why? thanks, Dave # yum -yq --security check-update 2/dev/null Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirror.5ninesolutions.com * base: ftp.osuosl.org * centosplus: centos.promopeddler.com * contrib: mirrors.kernel.org * epel: mirror.pnl.gov * extras: mirror.rocketinternet.net * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de * rpmfusion-free-updates: mirror.web-ster.com * rpmfusion-free-updates-testing: mirror.web-ster.com * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: mirror.web-ster.com * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing: mirror.web-ster.com * updates: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu Limiting package lists to security relevant ones No packages needed, for security, 31 available aalib.x86_64 1.4.0-5.el5.rf rpmforge blas.x86_64 3.1.1-1.el5.rf rpmforge cadaver.x86_64 0.22.5-1.el5.rf rpmforge dnsmasq.x86_64 2.55-1.el5.rf rpmforge emacs-git.x86_64 1.7.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge enca.x86_64 1.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge gdal.x86_64 1.4.4-2.el5.rf rpmforge geos.x86_64 3.2.2-1.el5.rf rpmforge git.x86_64 1.7.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge hdf5.x86_64 1.8.0-1.el5.rf rpmforge iso-codes.noarch 1.0a-1.el5.rf rpmforge lapack.x86_64 3.1.1-1.el5.rf rpmforge lftp.x86_64 4.0.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge libextractor.x86_64 0.5.22-2.el5.rf rpmforge libmpcdec.x86_64 1.2.6-1.el5.rf rpmforge libpaper.x86_64 1.1.22-1.el5.rf rpmforge libwpd.x86_64 0.8.14-1.el5.rf rpmforge mtr.x86_64 2:0.80-1.el5.rf rpmforge netcdf.x86_64 3.6.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge netcdf-devel.x86_64 3.6.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge perl-Compress-Zlib.noarch 2.015-1.el5.rf rpmforge perl-DBI.x86_64 1.615-1.el5.rf rpmforge perl-Git.x86_64 1.7.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge perl-HTML-Parser.x86_64 3.68-1.el5.rf rpmforge perl-HTML-Tagset.noarch 3.20-1.el5.rf rpmforge proj.x86_64 4.7.0-1.el5.rf rpmforge rsync.x86_64 3.0.7-1.el5.rf rpmforge syslinux.x86_64 4.03-1.el5.rf rpmforge udftools.x86_64 1.0.0b3-3.el5.rfrpmforge xvidcore.x86_64 1.2.2-1.el5.rf rpmforge Obsoleting Packages perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.030-2.el5.rf dag perl-Compress-Zlib.x86_64 1.42-1.fc6 installed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] pam_ldap login under centOS
Hello List I am attempting to setup various pam modules to consult our new LDAP services in order to do what it needs to do. I have setup my /etc/pam.d sudo file (for example) this way in the attempt to accomplish this via LDAP: [r...@vircent03:~]#cat /etc/pam.d/sudo #%PAM-1.0 auth include system-auth auth required pam_ldap.so accountinclude system-auth accountrequired pam_ldap.so password include system-auth password required pam_ldap.so sessionoptional pam_keyinit.so revoke sessionrequired pam_limits.so sessionrequired pam_ldap.so but even tho the user is part of the %wheel group under LDAP it is unable to sudo to any other account (including root). If I try to sudo this is what happens: [bluethu...@vircent03:~]#sudo bash [sudo] password for bluethundr: bluethundr is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported. It would appear that sudo support for ldap is compiled in: [r...@vircent03:~]#ldd $(which sudo)| grep -i ldap libldap-2.3.so.0 = /usr/lib/libldap-2.3.so.0 (0x00552000) This is how I setup my ldap.conf file [r...@vircent03:~]#cat /etc/openldap/ldap.conf # # LDAP Defaults # # See ldap.conf(5) for details # This file should be world readable but not world writable. #BASE dc=example, dc=com #URIldap://ldap.example.com ldap://ldap-master.example.com:666 #SIZELIMIT 12 #TIMELIMIT 15 #DEREF never URI ldap://ldap.acadaca.net/ BASE dc=acadaca,dc=net TLS_CACERTDIR /etc/openldap/cacerts sudoers_base ou=sudoers,ou=Services,dc=acadaca,dc=net In my openldap logs on the LDAP server there appears to be no activity when I sudo. however in the secure logs on the client I do.. Nov 8 16:05:34 VIRCENT03 su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session opened for user root by bluethundr(uid=500) Nov 8 16:05:37 VIRCENT03 su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session opened for user bluethundr by bluethundr(uid=0) Nov 8 16:05:44 VIRCENT03 sudo: bluethundr : user NOT in sudoers ; TTY=pts/5 ; PWD=/home/bluethundr ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/bash I do see other events in secure.log that appear to be pam successes however. am i interpreting this correctly that at least part of the system is communicating with pam on the ldap server? thanks -- Here's my RSA Public key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 Share and enjoy!! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
ahmad riza h nst writes: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? The large number of system users should not be a problem. Might have been an issue with Linux 2.4 (2^16=65536 max users), but Linux 2.6 can handle a LOT (2^32=4294967296)[1]. I'd be more worried of the stress this number of users can inflict on a machine (CPU, memory, I/O etc). [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel -- Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Flash plugin not working
Hi, I have a fresh install of CentOS 5.5, with a minimal GNOME desktop. I configured RPMForge as third party repo. I updated everything first, then installed flash-plugin. (And yes, I restarted Firefox... :oD). All I see when I try to see some things Flash on the Internet, like Youtube or the likes, I get... nothing. The space remains white. Sometimes a black square will appear, sometimes it will redisappear again. $ rpm -q flash-plugin flash-plugin-10.1.82.76-0.1.el5.rf I also tried to give the more recent version from Adobe a shot, with the same result. I took a look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, where everything seems normal. $ ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 nov 8 22:22 libflashplayer.so - /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Which leaves me clueless. Any suggestions ? Cheers, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, I have a fresh install of CentOS 5.5, with a minimal GNOME desktop. I configured RPMForge as third party repo. I updated everything first, then installed flash-plugin. (And yes, I restarted Firefox... :oD). All I see when I try to see some things Flash on the Internet, like Youtube or the likes, I get... nothing. The space remains white. Sometimes a black square will appear, sometimes it will redisappear again. $ rpm -q flash-plugin flash-plugin-10.1.82.76-0.1.el5.rf I also tried to give the more recent version from Adobe a shot, with the same result. I took a look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, where everything seems normal. $ ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 nov 8 22:22 libflashplayer.so - /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Which leaves me clueless. Any suggestions ? anything in about:plugins ? (type that in your address bar in firefox) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] large numbers of linux system user for postfix
On 11/08/10 2:16 PM, n...@nux.ro wrote: ahmad riza h nst writes: hello, i need to setup a mail server with postfix + dovecot + webmin + virtualmin + virtual user with linux system user. the virtual user may reach to thousands user from several hundreds virtual domains. what i concern is large numbers of linux system user which used in these setup, is it good or bad? The large number of system users should not be a problem. Might have been an issue with Linux 2.4 (2^16=65536 max users), but Linux 2.6 can handle a LOT (2^32=4294967296)[1]. I'd be more worried of the stress this number of users can inflict on a machine (CPU, memory, I/O etc). indeed. if half those 1000s of users do the typical lUser thing of checking their mail every minute, thats going to be a LOT of forks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg a écrit : anything in about:plugins ? (type that in your address bar in firefox) Yeah, first thing I checked. Everything seems fine : Shockwave Flash Fichier : libflashplayer.so Version : Shockwave Flash 10.1 r82 Type MIME Description SuffixesAutorisé application/x-shockwave-flash Shockwave Flash swf Oui application/futuresplashFutureSplash Player spl Oui ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:42:33 +0100 Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net wrote: $ ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 nov 8 22:22 libflashplayer.so - /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Which leaves me clueless. Any suggestions ? Hi, Try to put the flash lib in ~/.mozilla/plugins the following way: Make ~/Flash64 dir, put there libflashplayer.so from Adobe Flash rpm and then make symlink to ~/.mozilla: ~/.mozilla/plugins/@libflashplayer.so Why do you use flash-plugin? Use the latest lib from Adobe. 32 and 64 bit versions of latest flashes: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html My flash: Shockwave Flash 10.2 d161 (from about:plugins in web browser) Regards -- Please do NOT Cc me on Mailing Lists Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl pgpffRXOcmxhH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
Niki Kovacs wrote: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg a écrit : anything in about:plugins ? (type that in your address bar in firefox) Yeah, first thing I checked. Everything seems fine : Shockwave Flash yep looks good. anything in dmesg after it fails? or could it be selinux maybe? otherwise no further ideas, good luck ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
Przemysław Pawełczyk a écrit : Why do you use flash-plugin? Use the latest lib from Adobe. 32 and 64 bit versions of latest flashes: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html My flash: Shockwave Flash 10.2 d161 (from about:plugins in web browser) I tried what you suggested. Removed flash-plugin, installed development version. When I open about:plugins, I have this : Shockwave Flash Fichier : libflashplayer.so Version : Shockwave Flash 10.2 d161 But still, no videos can be played. Whenever I go on snotr.com, youtube.com or the likes, I either get a blank space where the video should be, or a black square the size of the video, but nothing in it. I tried this on two fresh installs on two different machines, with the same result. I'm clueless. Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
On 11/08/10 2:28 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: But still, no videos can be played. Whenever I go on snotr.com, youtube.com or the likes, I either get a blank space where the video should be, or a black square the size of the video, but nothing in it. I tried this on two fresh installs on two different machines, with the same result. I had similar problems on netbook using the Poulsbro chipset. Couldn't find any solution, even using Fedorka.latest. gave up and put the windows HD back in the netbook. what I'm trying to suggest is, this could possibly be an issue with your X-Windows graphics adapter driver. In my case, it was the poulsbo graphics driver, which is known experimental and sub-par. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:33:14 -0800 John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 11/08/10 2:28 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: But still, no videos can be played. Whenever I go on snotr.com, youtube.com or the likes, I either get a blank space where the video should be, or a black square the size of the video, but nothing in it. I tried this on two fresh installs on two different machines, with the same result. I had similar problems on netbook using the Poulsbro chipset. Couldn't find any solution, even using Fedorka.latest. gave up and put the windows HD back in the netbook. what I'm trying to suggest is, this could possibly be an issue with your X-Windows graphics adapter driver. In my case, it was the poulsbo graphics driver, which is known experimental and sub-par. Hi, Did you (Niki) try to d/load any flv from youtube.com and run it with (s)mplayer for example? Perhaps try to change video driver or set up VBox, install CentOS in it, and then smplayer. VBox has excellent vesa driver and CentOS is very good host to run VBox with other systems. What did google say when asked for black flash film frames? Regards -- Please do NOT Cc me on Mailing Lists Przemysław Pawełczyk (P2O2) [pron. Pshemislav Paveltchick] http://pp.blast.pl, pp...@o2.pl pgpcjBQrWhJGX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.com wrote: Hi All, Was wondering if anyone knows there are any separate rpms to be able to install a true bourne shell and not one linked to bash. Bash has some options to run in compatibility mode. Not sure what you need, but may do the trick. It's useful if you need to build on Linux then move to another environment. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
On 11/08/10 3:13 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Phil Savoiepsavoie1...@rogers.com wrote: Hi All, Was wondering if anyone knows there are any separate rpms to be able to install a true bourne shell and not one linked to bash. Bash has some options to run in compatibility mode. Not sure what you need, but may do the trick. It's useful if you need to build on Linux then move to another environment. I thought it did that by default if it was invoked as /usr/bin/sh via the link ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Is there any other solution for building a SAN under linux ? None of my customers use a SAN right now. I have some friends who speak pretty highly of their Dell SAN gear (re-branded EMC CX300) with Qlogic HBAs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill? http://freenas.org/features Sent from my iPhone On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Is there any other solution for building a SAN under linux ? None of my customers use a SAN right now. I have some friends who speak pretty highly of their Dell SAN gear (re-branded EMC CX300) with Qlogic HBAs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
On 11/09/2010 12:58 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill? http://freenas.org/features Sent from my iPhone On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote: On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: Is there any other solution for building a SAN under linux ? How about openfiler: http://www.openfiler.com/ Regards, Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
On 11/08/2010 04:06 PM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 11/09/2010 12:58 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill? http://freenas.org/features How about openfiler: http://www.openfiler.com/ I don't believe either of those support exporting volumes over Fibre Channel. You could do iSCSI, but your performance wouldn't be as good. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
- Original Message - | On 11/09/2010 12:58 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: | Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill? | | http://freenas.org/features | | | Sent from my iPhone | | On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote: | | On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote: | | Is there any other solution for building a SAN under linux ? | | How about openfiler: http://www.openfiler.com/ | | Regards, | Patrick | ___ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos All the tools to build a SAN are available out there, but it is a more complicated problem then you might expect to develop one. For example, you could have GNU/Linux or Solaris 10 hosts that act as dumb iSCSI target enclosures with a bunch of disks in them. This device could have FC, 1 or 10 GbE, Infiniband or some other adapter and attach to your existing storage fabric. That's the easy part! You then need a method for dealing with the high availability aspect. You need to be able to fence the storage while a fail-over is taking place. You need to (maybe) move MAC addresses and other storage IP bits. This is the hard part! Getting this right is not necessarily a trivial task. Products like FreeNAS and OpenFiler only target the easy stuff. Now, you could virtualize the head node using something like Xen, KVM or VMWare, then in case of failure or administrative necessity, fail over to the other physical hardware, which *may* negate some of the hard bits, but you would need to *really* test it in the most common scenarios to see if it fits your bill. I have a solution that is currently centered around commodity storage bricks (Dell R510), flash PCI-E controllers, 1 or 10GbE (on separate Jumbo Frame Data Tier) and Solaris + ZFS. So far it has worked out really well. Each R510 is a box with a fair bit of memory, running OpenIndiana for ZFS/RAIDZ3/Disk Dedup/iSCSI. Each brick is fully populated and in a RAIDZ2 configuration with 1 hot spare. Some have SSDs most have SAS or SATA. I export this storage pool as a single iSCSI target and I attach each of these targets to the SAN pool and provision from there. I have two VMWare physical machines which are identically configured. If I need to perform administrative maintenance on the boxes I can migrate the host over to the other machine. This works for me, but it took a really long time to develop the solution and for the cost of my time it *might* have been cheaper to just buy some package deal. It was a hell of a lot of fun learning though. ;) -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
On 11/08/10 4:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: You then need a method for dealing with the high availability aspect. You need to be able to fence the storage while a fail-over is taking place. You need to (maybe) move MAC addresses and other storage IP bits. This is the hard part! Getting this right is not necessarily a trivial task. Products like FreeNAS and OpenFiler only target the easy stuff. the -really- hard part is maintaining write cache coherency across redundant storage servers.thats what seperates the pros from the toys. btw, the product that the OP was asking about, the Quantum StorNext, I did a bit of reading on that, its a distributed network storage system. Quantum is selling it as a Data Sharing and Archive software, its not a conventional SAN at all. It looks like its being sold to the TV post production industry, using Apple XSan and XServer based storage. Quantum acquired it when they picked up ADIC, who in turn had bought the original company that had developed it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
On 11/8/10 6:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: I have a solution that is currently centered around commodity storage bricks (Dell R510), flash PCI-E controllers, 1 or 10GbE (on separate Jumbo Frame Data Tier) and Solaris + ZFS. So far it has worked out really well. Each R510 is a box with a fair bit of memory, running OpenIndiana for ZFS/RAIDZ3/Disk Dedup/iSCSI. Each brick is fully populated and in a RAIDZ2 configuration with 1 hot spare. Some have SSDs most have SAS or SATA. I export this storage pool as a single iSCSI target and I attach each of these targets to the SAN pool and provision from there. I have two VMWare physical machines which are identically configured. If I need to perform administrative maintenance on the boxes I can migrate the host over to the other machine. This works for me, but it took a really long time to develop the solution and for the cost of my time it *might* have been cheaper to just buy some package deal. It was a hell of a lot of fun learning though. ;) Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial version for a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly large size. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill? http://freenas.org/features Thanks for the suggestions (others also), but I don't beleivee it'll do. We need to be able to access the file system directly via FC so we can lock files across systems. Pretty much like xSan, but not on apple. xSan is really StorNext from Qlogic, but half the price per node. So, we are searching for an alternative to xSan, on linux. For those who don't know xSan, you can access a fibre-channel volume directly, and simultanously among many clients computer or servers. Access, locking and other tasks are handled by a metadata controler who is reponsible for keeping things together. No controler, no volume, hence a failover controler is needed. So from what I've read so far, I'll be stuck with StorNext. Some nodes have dedicated volumes on the fiber channel network, and I beleive with what I've read that I could replicate not too difficulty what we've done with the guid partition and apple lable volumes. Thanks, Nicolas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:39:22PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/08/10 3:13 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Phil Savoiepsavoie1...@rogers.com wrote: Hi All, Was wondering if anyone knows there are any separate rpms to be able to I thought it did that by default if it was invoked as /usr/bin/sh via the link ? Doesn't seem to do so, with my strenuous test of typing sh then trying echo $UID. The true Bourne shell doesn't have that (which messed me up once when forgetting that and working on an AIX box. I think that's when I discovered that UID is a bash-ism and not a sh-ism. Note that that is the only test I did--it might be that everything else is perfect. IIRC, back when that happened (writing something portable and needing to test syntax), I got the best results with dash. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Angel: I knew this was gonna happen. Buffy: What? What do you think is happening? Angel: You're 16 years old, I'm 241. Buffy: I've done the math. Angel: You don't know what you're doing. You don't know what you want. Buffy: Oh, no. I think I do. I want out of this conversation. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote: Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill? http://freenas.org/features Thanks for the suggestions (others also), but I don't beleivee it'll do. We need to be able to access the file system directly via FC so we can lock files across systems. Pretty much like xSan, but not on apple. xSan is really StorNext from Qlogic, but half the price per node. So, we are searching for an alternative to xSan, on linux. For those who don't know xSan, you can access a fibre-channel volume directly, and simultanously among many clients computer or servers. Access, locking and other tasks are handled by a metadata controler who is reponsible for keeping things together. No controler, no volume, hence a failover controler is needed. So from what I've read so far, I'll be stuck with StorNext. Some nodes have dedicated volumes on the fiber channel network, and I beleive with what I've read that I could replicate not too difficulty what we've done with the guid partition and apple lable volumes. Thanks, Nicolas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Take a look @ Gluster / GlusterFS, it may just do what you need? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
On 11/08/10 7:34 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:39:22PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/08/10 3:13 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Phil Savoiepsavoie1...@rogers.com wrote: Hi All, Was wondering if anyone knows there are any separate rpms to be able to I thought it did that by default if it was invoked as /usr/bin/sh via the link ? Doesn't seem to do so, with my strenuous test of typing sh then trying echo $UID. The true Bourne shell doesn't have that (which messed me up once when forgetting that and working on an AIX box. I think that's when I discovered that UID is a bash-ism and not a sh-ism. Note that that is the only test I did--it might be that everything else is perfect. IIRC, back when that happened (writing something portable and needing to test syntax), I got the best results with dash. ah, yes.bash as sh is a superset of sh. most anything written for sh should work, but lots and lots of stuff on bash as sh won't work on sh but, then, I'm not sure sh on solaris is quite exactly the same as sh on aix. anyways, aix users usually uses ksh. but ksh on linux is a little sketchy. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT - Any true bourne shells out there for linux?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Kwan Lowe kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.com wrote: Hi All, Was wondering if anyone knows there are any separate rpms to be able to install a true bourne shell and not one linked to bash. Bash has some options to run in compatibility mode. Not sure what you need, but may do the trick. It's useful if you need to build on Linux then move to another environment. In that case, tcshell might be a viable alternative. It's more like an addon for all OS's so the differences might well be smaller. Just a thought, not a thoroughly tested opinion. BR Bent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Flash plugin not working
Przemysław Pawełczyk a écrit : Did you (Niki) try to d/load any flv from youtube.com and run it with (s)mplayer for example? Perhaps try to change video driver or set up VBox, install CentOS in it, and then smplayer. VBox has excellent vesa driver and CentOS is very good host to run VBox with other systems. What did google say when asked for black flash film frames? Regards I tried this on four differents machines here. It's a computer training room, so there's plenty of ready Linux installs on a Ghost server. Flash works on any one of these machines with Fedora, openSUSE and Arch. So it's not the hardware. Fresh install of CentOS with RPMForge configured and flash-plugin installed : Flash fails everywhere. Same result with flash-plugin from the Adobe repo. Still more clueless than before :o) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
