[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-6.0 i386 and x86_64
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-6.0 for
i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
CentOS-6.0 is based on the upstream release EL 6.0 and includes packages
from all variants. All upstream repositories have been combined into
one, to make it easier for end users to work with.
There are some important changes to this release compared with the
previous versions of CentOS and we highly recommend reading this
announcement along with the Release Notes at
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0
There are no CD images being released with CentOS-6, however we have
some CD variants in the pipeline. Details for these are mentioned below.
Since upstream has a 6.1 version already released, we will be using a
Continous Release repository for 6.0 to bring all 6.1 and post 6.1
security updates to all 6.0 users, till such time as CentOS-6.1 is
released itself. There will be more details about this posted within the
next 48 hours.
+++
Upgrading from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5:
We recommend everyone run through a reinstall rather than attempt an
inplace upgrade from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5
+++
LiveCD and LiveDVD
LiveCDs and LiveDVDs for i386 and x86_64 will be released within the
next few days. These will bring in the ability to directly install from
the livemedia.
+++
Minimal Install CD
We have also created a minimal install CD, that would bring up a base
machine with just enough content to have a usable platform. This CD
image will be released in the next few days.
+++
The LightWeightServer (LWS) CD
In order to bring back the CentOS-4 Server CD style single iso image, we
are creating a LWS varient of the main distro. Details for this will be
posted in the next few days with release happening after the live media
and the minimal cd editions.
+++
Downloading CentOS-6.0 for new installs:
When possible, consider using torrents to run the downloads. In most
cases you will find its also the fastest means to download the distro.
There are currently over a thousand people seeding CentOS-6 and it's
possible to get upto 100mbps downloads via these torrents.
Torrent files for the DVD's are avilable at :
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
You can also use a mirror close to you :
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=30
Most mirrors will allow direct DVD downloads over http, ftp and rsync.
Please keep in mind that not all mirrors are currently updated, some
might take upto another 24 hours before they have all the content.
+++
sha1sum for the CentOS-6.0 ISOS:
i386:
fcf49e875cd4494f2af68cf257ab9e93523c9427 CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso
862815623d2e7990207dd78a281837c7eb719e83 CentOS-6.0-i386-netinstall.iso
x86_64:
9de87b0c696ebd72b952edb4cc06c24cbdc37d81 CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso
5e3834621f11fbcca78cf7d70625c647045f45f5 CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD2.iso
23f9e606cbcbd52d2e5df3716a85cdde336f7bfe CentOS-6.0-x86_64-netinstall.iso
+++
Sources and Debuginfo packages:
SRPMS and debuginfo packages are still making their way to the CentOS
mirrors and should be available within the next 24 to 48 hours. We are
prioritising the centos modified packages.
+++
Getting Help:
The best place to start when looking for help with CentOS is at the wiki
( http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp ) which lists various options and
communities who might be able to help. If you think there is a bug in
the system, do report it at http://bugs.centos.org/ - but keep in mind
that the bugs system is *not* a support mechanism.
+++
Contributing and joining the project:
We are always looking for people to join and help with various things in
the project. If you are keen to help out a good place to start is the
wiki page at http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute . If you have questions
or a specific area you would like to contribute towards that is not
covered on that page, feel free to drop in on
#centos-de...@irc.freenode.net for a chat or email the centos-devel list
(http://lists.centos.org).
+++
Thanks to everyone who contributed towards making 6.0
Enjoy!
--
Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org
The CentOS Project {http://www.centos.org}
irc: z00...@irc.freenode.net ( #centos, #centos-devel )
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Consulta permisos Linux-Samba
Hola, Tengo un directorio compartido para estaciones Windows a través de Samba. Lo que quisiera es saber como hacer para que los usuarios puedan crear archivos, directorios y editar los archivos o directorios ya creados, pero que no puedan borrar la data en esos directorios compartidos asi sea el usuario el dueño el usuario que lo haya creado Sin embargo si permitirle a 2 o 3 usuarios lo anterior descrito y que solo ellos puedan borrar la data. Mira si con listas ACL puede solucionarlo... http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html -- Saludos, Oscar Osta Pueyo @kiakli ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] CentOS 6
Hola lista, asi como yo muchos estuvieron esperando centOS 6: http://mirror.its.sfu.ca/mirror/CentOS/6.0/isos/i386/ Hay algunos espejos mas: http://twitter.com/#!/centos, saludos. Nota: lo que no entiendo es que dicen que falta un 0.1% del contenido que pronto se liberará, que por ahora esta en un 99% del contenido, mi pregunta es ese 0.1% es muy importante?¿, saludos reiterados... ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] error al Instalar dgal-devel MAPSERVER
estoy queriendo instalar mapserver-5.6.3 y bueno he realizado lo siguietne: Como usuario root Librerías requeridas yum install libpng-devel freetype-devel gd-devel zlib-devel TODO OK Librerías muy recomendadas (proj ya se instaló para postgis) yum install proj-devel curl-devel gdal-devel agg-devel proj-epsg TODO BIEN EXCEPTO gdal-devl error Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal-devel.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: gdal = 1.4.4-2.el5.rf for package: gdal-devel -- Processing Dependency: libgdal.so.1 for package: gdal-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so for package: gdal -- Finished Dependency Resolution gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) Error: Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest La libreria gdal-devl no se instala, tambien intenete esto: -- yum -y install gdal-devel error Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal-devel.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: gdal = 1.4.4-2.el5.rf for package: gdal-devel -- Processing Dependency: libgdal.so.1 for package: gdal-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so for package: gdal -- Finished Dependency Resolution gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) Error: Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodiges Tambien intente esto: # rpm -ivh geos-devel-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm error: Error de dependencias: geos = 3.1.0-1.el5.rf se necesita para geos-devel-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386 Luego intente: [root@svrmapas ~]# rpm -ivh geos-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm error: Error de dependencias: libgeos-3.1.0.so se necesita para geos-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386 por ultimo revise esto: cd /usr/local/lib/ geos/libgeos-3.2.2.so libgeos_c.so.1.6.2 libproj.so.0.6.6 libgdal.alibgeos-3.3.0rc2.so libgeos_c.so.1.7.0 libxml2.a libgdal.la libgeos.alibgeos.la libxml2.la libgdal.so libgeos_c.a libgeos.so libxml2.so libgdal.so.1 libgeos_c.la libproj.alibxml2.so.2 libgdal.so.1.12.3libgeos_c.so libproj.la libxml2.so.2.7.6 libgdal.so.1.14.2libgeos_c.so.1 libproj.so pkgconfig/ libgeos-3.0.0.so libgeos_c.so.1.4.1 libproj.so.0 xml2Conf.sh y no se me asoma libgeos-3.1.0.so-- como se puede observar AHORA SI NO SE QUE HACER ::.. BUSCO EN INTERNET ESTA LIBRERIA PERO NO LA HALLO GRACIAS carla cuenca ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Consulta permisos Linux-Samba
Saludos, Puedes mirar la opción del empleo de ACL's para complementar los derechos de los usuarios. Te recomiendo mirar este documento de AlcanceLibre http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php?page=como-ACLdonde se explica el tema y hay un ejemplo de como hacerlo. El 7 de julio de 2011 17:49, Adolfo Salazar armic...@gmail.com escribió: Estimados: Quizá la pregunta sea muy sencilla, pero no encuentro la forma de hacerlo. Tengo un directorio compartido para estaciones Windows a través de Samba. Lo que quisiera es saber como hacer para que los usuarios puedan crear archivos, directorios y editar los archivos o directorios ya creados, pero que no puedan borrar la data en esos directorios compartidos asi sea el usuario el dueño el usuario que lo haya creado Sin embargo si permitirle a 2 o 3 usuarios lo anterior descrito y que solo ellos puedan borrar la data. He estado revisando, busque en internet y no encuentro la forma. Gracias por las respuestas a este correo. Saludos: Adolfo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- John Jairo Toro A. NewRoute Inc. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] error al Instalar dgal-devel MAPSERVER
Hola Carla. Disculpá que no pueda responder tu problema, te hago una consulta... Estoy interesado en armar una computadora y en ella instalar MapServer con Centos 5.5, vos tendrías algún manual o página web donde haya información que Yo pueda leer y saber cómo instalar MapServer y los requisitos que necesito de computadora (Server) ?. Desde ya muchas gracias. Saludos. El 8 de julio de 2011 16:35, Carla Paulina Fernández Morocho cpaul...@hotmail.com escribió: estoy queriendo instalar mapserver-5.6.3 y bueno he realizado lo siguietne: Como usuario root Librerías requeridas yum install libpng-devel freetype-devel gd-devel zlib-devel TODO OK Librerías muy recomendadas (proj ya se instaló para postgis) yum install proj-devel curl-devel gdal-devel agg-devel proj-epsg TODO BIEN EXCEPTO gdal-devl error Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal-devel.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: gdal = 1.4.4-2.el5.rf for package: gdal-devel -- Processing Dependency: libgdal.so.1 for package: gdal-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so for package: gdal -- Finished Dependency Resolution gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) Error: Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest La libreria gdal-devl no se instala, tambien intenete esto: -- yum -y install gdal-devel error Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal-devel.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: gdal = 1.4.4-2.el5.rf for package: gdal-devel -- Processing Dependency: libgdal.so.1 for package: gdal-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so for package: gdal -- Finished Dependency Resolution gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) Error: Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodiges Tambien intente esto: # rpm -ivh geos-devel-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm error: Error de dependencias: geos = 3.1.0-1.el5.rf se necesita para geos-devel-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386 Luego intente: [root@svrmapas ~]# rpm -ivh geos-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm error: Error de dependencias: libgeos-3.1.0.so se necesita para geos-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386 por ultimo revise esto: cd /usr/local/lib/ geos/libgeos-3.2.2.so libgeos_c.so.1.6.2 libproj.so.0.6.6 libgdal.alibgeos-3.3.0rc2.so libgeos_c.so.1.7.0 libxml2.a libgdal.la libgeos.alibgeos.la libxml2.la libgdal.so libgeos_c.a libgeos.so libxml2.so libgdal.so.1 libgeos_c.la libproj.a libxml2.so.2 libgdal.so.1.12.3libgeos_c.so libproj.la libxml2.so.2.7.6 libgdal.so.1.14.2libgeos_c.so.1 libproj.so pkgconfig/ libgeos-3.0.0.so libgeos_c.so.1.4.1 libproj.so.0 xml2Conf.sh y no se me asoma libgeos-3.1.0.so-- como se puede observar AHORA SI NO SE QUE HACER ::.. BUSCO EN INTERNET ESTA LIBRERIA PERO NO LA HALLO GRACIAS carla cuenca ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- _(@^@)__ Luciano Andres Chiarotto Celular:02652-15655153; San Luis (Capital). Técnico Universitario en Microprocesadores El saber es la parte principal de la felicidad. Sócrates (470-399 a. C.); filósofo griego. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] error al Instalar dgal-devel MAPSERVER
2011/7/10 Luciano Andrés Chiarotto lachiaro...@gmail.com Hola Carla. Disculpá que no pueda responder tu problema, te hago una consulta... Estoy interesado en armar una computadora y en ella instalar MapServer con Centos 5.5, vos tendrías algún manual o página web donde haya información que Yo pueda leer y saber cómo instalar MapServer y los requisitos que necesito de computadora (Server) ?. Desde ya muchas gracias. Saludos. El 8 de julio de 2011 16:35, Carla Paulina Fernández Morocho cpaul...@hotmail.com escribió: estoy queriendo instalar mapserver-5.6.3 y bueno he realizado lo siguietne: Como usuario root Librerías requeridas yum install libpng-devel freetype-devel gd-devel zlib-devel TODO OK Librerías muy recomendadas (proj ya se instaló para postgis) yum install proj-devel curl-devel gdal-devel agg-devel proj-epsg TODO BIEN EXCEPTO gdal-devl error Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal-devel.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: gdal = 1.4.4-2.el5.rf for package: gdal-devel -- Processing Dependency: libgdal.so.1 for package: gdal-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so for package: gdal -- Finished Dependency Resolution gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) Error: Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest La libreria gdal-devl no se instala, tambien intenete esto: -- yum -y install gdal-devel error Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal-devel.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: gdal = 1.4.4-2.el5.rf for package: gdal-devel -- Processing Dependency: libgdal.so.1 for package: gdal-devel -- Running transaction check --- Package gdal.i386 0:1.4.4-2.el5.rf set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so for package: gdal -- Finished Dependency Resolution gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 from rpmforge has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) Error: Missing Dependency: libgeos-3.1.0.so is needed by package gdal-1.4.4-2.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodiges Tambien intente esto: # rpm -ivh geos-devel-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm error: Error de dependencias: geos = 3.1.0-1.el5.rf se necesita para geos-devel-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386 Luego intente: [root@svrmapas ~]# rpm -ivh geos-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm error: Error de dependencias: libgeos-3.1.0.so se necesita para geos-3.1.0-1.el5.rf.i386 por ultimo revise esto: cd /usr/local/lib/ geos/libgeos-3.2.2.so libgeos_c.so.1.6.2 libproj.so.0.6.6 libgdal.alibgeos-3.3.0rc2.so libgeos_c.so.1.7.0 libxml2.a libgdal.la libgeos.alibgeos.la libxml2.la libgdal.so libgeos_c.a libgeos.so libxml2.so libgdal.so.1 libgeos_c.la libproj.a libxml2.so.2 libgdal.so.1.12.3libgeos_c.so libproj.la libxml2.so.2.7.6 libgdal.so.1.14.2libgeos_c.so.1 libproj.so pkgconfig/ libgeos-3.0.0.so libgeos_c.so.1.4.1 libproj.so.0 xml2Conf.sh y no se me asoma libgeos-3.1.0.so-- como se puede observar AHORA SI NO SE QUE HACER ::.. BUSCO EN INTERNET ESTA LIBRERIA PERO NO LA HALLO GRACIAS carla cuenca ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- _(@^@)__ Luciano Andres Chiarotto Celular:02652-15655153; San Luis (Capital). Técnico Universitario en Microprocesadores El saber es la parte principal de la felicidad. Sócrates (470-399 a. C.); filósofo griego. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es A lo mejor esto te sirve: http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=libgeos-3.1.0.so()(64bit)
[CentOS-es] Presentación
Amigos: Mi nombre es Luis y llevo bastante tiempo trabajando con Linux a nivel de escritorio; ahora pretendo involucarme con el tema de los servidores sobre CentOS. Como no tengo preparación formal en tecnología voy a molestarlos con algunas consultas que me ayudarán a entender la forma de resolver los problemas. Espero contar con su ayuda y paciencia Saludos Luis ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Configurar cliente de correo en modo texto
Estimados: Tengo instalado Centos 5.5 en modo texto sobre una maquina virtual sobre Ubuntu, estoy intentando configurar un cliente de correo desde la consola; me he documentaqdo que no existe un cliente de correo propiamente tal, sino que debo trabajar con dos componentes: un Mail User Agent (MUTT) y un Mail Transport Agent (Postfix). Por favor confirmenme si entendí correctamente la estructura y en donde debería configurar el servidor POP y SMTP de las cuentas de correo que quiero revisar desde la consola. Saludos Luis This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] More on CentOS autotools bug
On 7/8/11, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/8/2011 9:45 AM, John Hodrien wrote: I was curious, so *did* find out what the cause was, and it's entirely not CentOS's fault. It's very hard to shoot blindly given that the cause was likely not to be CentOS. That only left his autoconf files, and tracing configure made it quite easy to find. So he's done something non-standard that he doesn't remember on the RH system where he claims it works Specifically somebody edited the files on a Windows machine and the process choked on the CR/LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Wierd cursor jump when I type letter y
On 7/10/11, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote: Can't say. It is my personal lap-top. But I think I have seen the same behavior on my CentOS 5.6 desktop, but right now I can not be sure. I am atypical keyboard user. I often have problems when I try to use the Shift key, I press it but it is like I have not done so, and I can reproduce this on at least 3 separate keyboards, and this jumping. H, just now it jumped 7 rows up + ~35 char to the right, but on the this word from last sentence. But it does not happen that often to warrant reinstall or something similar. I am just wondering if someone knows what might be happening. Sounds familiar to me. Which is why the first thing I do on my Thinkpads is to disable the trackpad :D I will never buy a laptop that didn't have a trackpoint or equivalent. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] bond0 performance issues in 5.6
Hi all,
I've got two gigabit ethernet interfaces bonded in CentOS 5.6. I've
set miimode=1000 and I've tried mode= 0, 4 and 6. I've not been able
to get better than 112MB/sec, which is the same as the non-bonded
interfaces.
My config files are:
===
cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-{eth1,eth2,bond0}
# SN1
HWADDR=00:30:48:fd:26:71
DEVICE=eth1
BOOTPROTO=none
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
# SN2
HWADDR=00:1B:21:87:80:CE
DEVICE=eth2
BOOTPROTO=none
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
# Bonded interfaces for Storage Network
DEVICE=bond0
IPADDR=192.168.21.80
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
USERCTL=no
BONDING_OPTS=miimon=1000 mode=0
===
I'm running benchmarks using iperf (.90 is the second machine with a
matching bonded connection):
===
iperf -f M -c 192.168.21.90
Client connecting to 192.168.21.90, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.02 MByte (default)
[ 3] local 192.168.21.80 port 35728 connected with 192.168.21.90 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1086 MBytes 109 MBytes/sec
===
This is the speed a non-bonded interface:
===
iperf -f M -c 192.168.22.90
Client connecting to 192.168.22.90, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 0.02 MByte (default)
[ 3] local 192.168.22.80 port 57475 connected with 192.168.22.90 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1125 MBytes 112 MBytes/sec
===
The switch is a D-Link DGS-3100, which is a managed switch that I
believe is capable of 801.3ad (for mode=4).
Any advice?
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
Freenode handle: digimer
Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
I feel confined, only free to expand myself within boundaries.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Show your CentOS Support
Karanbir Singh wrote: If you would like one, please send me an email on kbsingh at the centos.org domain, and let me know your address and what size you would want, I would be happy to ship it out to any part of the world as long as you are willing to cover postage costs ( as an example : they fit into jiffy bags that cost £1 at the postoffice, and its about £1.50 shipping per Tshirt to the UK via first class ). Guys, guys!!! Have you READ KB's mail at all? - Mail must be send off-list to the mail he provided (kbsingh at the centos.org domain) - You will only pay for shipping and packing, to the Post Office/UPS/Fedex/whatever I believe you will have to re-send your mails to the correct address. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
Ron Blizzard wrote: On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Always Learning cen...@u6.u22.net wrote: The truth is my mp3 playing ability was installed about a year ago when I was first introduced to Centos and I experienced a very rapid and steep learning curve (which I successfully overcame as usual). I do not know where the mp3 playing ability came from. To me it really doesn't matter where it (and the DVD stuff) comes from -- it's just a one-time repository set up anyhow and then it updates itself. What Windows users don't realize is that most of their codecs come from the add-on applications that need to be installed. At least it did in XP (not sure about Vista and Vista 7). Try playing a DVD without installing PowerDVD or burning CDs or DVDs without Nero (for example). The reason most Windows' users don't run into this issue is because their computers usually come pre-installed with OEM software. If you install Linux Mint (for one) you never have to worry about any of this either. And it's only a minor issue with CentOS and those distributions that don't come with codecs (and Flash, etc) pre-installed. That is exactly why I intend to create Desktop version, regular CentOS with additional repositories and virtual package(s) pulling necessary real packages. If launched from main menu it could be done as an add-on package enhancing existing CentOS. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On 09/07/2011 23:20, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Craig White wrote: The reality is that applications are becoming more and more web based SAAS and as the costs of specific applications needed on specific platforms (ie, Quickbooks) rise, web based SAAS will replace them. The point is that for end users, the OS is eventually going to become irrelevant. Hm. First wider loss of internet access of something like Power loss in Japan will wake up most of the people that are now into Cloud based computing. Actually, I think first major Cloud player to be majorly hacked will be a double whammy to kill off the 'cloud' mentality: At least the following two will occur: * Everyone will question the security and privacy of their data in the 'cloud'. * The cloud provider will shut down for a couple of weeks (like the Playstation saga) to investigate what was accessed and how. Can your company afford to be without your apps and data for a couple of weeks, while some hacker organisation has it? I think not. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Wierd cursor jump when I type letter y
On 10/07/2011 00:10, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Guys. I have this problem for a long time. In large number of times when I type letter y, like in you my typing cursor jumps 2-3 rows up or 1-2 words to the left. I am unable to understand why. Could it be something with lap-top keyboard? Typing rate? CentOS 5.5 Gnome, I mostly use Firefox and Thunderbird. Check your key modifiers, sometimes they get stuck - serves us right for eating biscuits at the keyboard. By key modifiers I mean (Ctrl-L, Alt, AltGr, Ctrl-R, Fn etc...) -- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086 NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131 GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693 Business Email: giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net Skype: gilescoochey smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
John R. Dennison wrote: Symantec is garbage and has been for many years. Don't care for Kaspersky from past use, but that was indeed KAV as I've not used anything else from them. Perhaps I should evaluate their KIS offering. I've had absolutely no trouble whatsoever with Avast other than on my own personal desktop and that was strictly caused by my usage patterns and would not affect normal users in any way; I recommend and install avast on not only on family and friends boxes but on clients as well. I added Symantec mostly from past experience, haven't used it in years. Having Free versions (in general) that can really make PC's secure would defeat the purpose of having paid version, so they always lack something, mostly real-time application prevention. Once certain stronger trojans/malwares are incorporated they even stop KIS from installing in the first place. Not many of them, but I had that experience, and had to reinstall/format c: partition. I chose Kaspersky because of two things. Lesser in intensity is that he is from Russia, with different mindset very close to ours, but turning point when I started to think about actually paying for the product (at the dawn of my legality awakening) was when Eugen K. came to Belgrade to receive some award for his product. TV reporter asked him after the ceremony if he is going to go sightseeing the town, and he's response was No. I have flight back in one hour, I must get back to my work. Also worth mentioning is that there is Kaspersky for Linux Workstations and Servers, and even for the Mac: http://www.kaspersky.com/applications_list Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bond0 performance issues in 5.6
On 07/10/2011 08:14 AM, Digimer wrote: Any advice? Are there any 802.3ad modes that allow a single connection to span more than one slave? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to enable Flow Control on CentOS?
Giles Coochey wrote: On 09/07/2011 01:06, Les Mikesell wrote: Turning off negotiation pretty much guarantees problems if anything changes at the other end or you use an unmanaged switch. And the gigabit spec requires auto-negotiation. Let me make it clear - auto-negotiation only works if auto-negotiation is configured on both sides. It does not work if one side hard codes the speed and duplex. Both sides have to be set for it to negotiate. Agreeing on speed and duplex ensures that it will work. If something is going to change on the remote end without you knowing, or your provider is using an unmanaged switch then it's time to change provider :-) - they obviously are cheapskates and don't have any change management control on their systems. Gigabit is different. My reading of the spec is that when a port is configured for 1GbE over 1000BASE-T (copper), disabling auto-negotiation disables the advertising of the auto-negotiation for 10BASE-T and 100BASE-T, but auto-negotiation is still advertised and operational for 1GbE. Auto-negotiation cannot be disabled for 1000BASE-X (optical fiber). Deviation from the spec would mean such kit is Ethernet-like. An ability to set auto-negotiation one way in the user interface while leaving the hardware in a different - standards conforming - state is possible. -- Charles Polisher ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote: That is exactly why I intend to create Desktop version, regular CentOS with additional repositories and virtual package(s) pulling necessary real packages. If launched from main menu it could be done as an add-on package enhancing existing CentOS. Sounds like a great idea. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
Ned Slider wrote: That's just a by-product of the fact that it's never been a goal of upstream to make RHEL a self-hosting distribution. It's not a deliberate act designed to thwart rebuilders, be it Oracle or CentOS or anyone else. And even if it were, then it obviously failed given Oracle, SL and now CentOS have managed to successfully rebuild RHEL-6 (minus trademarks and artwork). I did say harder, not hard or impossible. Your comment came across, at least to me, as if Red Hat had deliberately tried to make it harder to rebuild RHEL with some changes they made to 6, and that's simply not the case. Even Oracle had to work on it for 4-5 months before release, enough for Red Hat to assert it self as the way to go if you want the real thing. That and change in how Kernel is distributed now (all patches are inside one tar file, and not separate as they are in 5.x) tells me that something IS going on, but limited enough not to show Red Hat as the bad wolf. They are business owned by greedy shareholders after all is said and done. Anyhow, that is my personal impression and opinion, sharpened by many years of double standards, blackmails, attacks, armed conflicts, corrupted politicians and common thieves masked as fighters for democracy, civil and ascended NGO's telling us we are all bunch of murderers, etc., my country (Serbia) had endured (and still endures) in last 20 years, all because we refused to surrender to NATO. In first world war we lost 1/3 of the population fighting against Axis countries. In second we lost 1/4 of population fighting against same Axis and bombings of western side of Alied forces at the end of the war. Then in 1990 we endured western-intelligence-agencies-enticed civil war. Then we were bombed in operation Merciful Angel in 1999 that bombed our hospitals with cassette and uranium bombs, and you are now telling me that world is in fact pink and corporations all play fair... If I am wrong than I will have to start visiting shrink(s). Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Wierd cursor jump when I type letter y
Giles Coochey wrote: On 10/07/2011 00:10, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Guys. I have this problem for a long time. In large number of times when I type letter y, like in you my typing cursor jumps 2-3 rows up or 1-2 words to the left. I am unable to understand why. Could it be something with lap-top keyboard? Typing rate? CentOS 5.5 Gnome, I mostly use Firefox and Thunderbird. Check your key modifiers, sometimes they get stuck - serves us right for eating biscuits at the keyboard. By key modifiers I mean (Ctrl-L, Alt, AltGr, Ctrl-R, Fn etc...) I do not have that problem now so I just did it again, and yes, it is my thumb hitting trackpad with the middle joint. I just managed to minimize Thunderbird. Thanks all, I never thought about that possibility. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:23:57AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Diatribe about Serbia removed. Is this really the appropriate list for this type of political pontification? John -- The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter. -- Winston Churchill pgpa6AeKTUNwb.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote: Actually, I think first major Cloud player to be majorly hacked will be a double whammy to kill off the 'cloud' mentality: At least the following two will occur: * Everyone will question the security and privacy of their data in the 'cloud'. * The cloud provider will shut down for a couple of weeks (like the Playstation saga) to investigate what was accessed and how. Can your company afford to be without your apps and data for a couple of weeks, while some hacker organisation has it? I think not. But it's not like you can't do both. The Cloud has the benefits of convenience (available from anywhere) and flexibility (OS agnostic). You would hope 1) That people back up their work (at least to other locations in the Cloud), and 2) That they have a local substitute suite of applications. And it's not like local machines are immune to hardware and security break downs, especially for the majority who use Windows. At this point my music is stored online (Amazon, listening to it now), a lot of my documents are created with Google Docs or Zoho, my email is almost completely online (has been for years), my recent pictures are stored and edited online (Picasa and Piknic), almost all my TV watching is done online (Hulu, Crackle, TheWB) and a big chunk of my movies are supplied from online sources (Hulu, Crackle, Netflix). That said, I think it may happen that amount of traffic ultimately falls in on itself. I don't see how Netflix (in the U.S.) can continue to use nearly a quarter of the Web's bandwith (for example) without paying some kind of tariff from the cable and DSL providers. So all this streaming might slow down quite a lot if Hulu, Crackle, Netflix and the others have to charge their customers for bandwith. We'll see what happens. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to enable Flow Control on CentOS?
On 10/07/2011 10:22, Charles Polisher wrote: Gigabit is different. My reading of the spec is that when a port is configured for 1GbE over 1000BASE-T (copper), disabling auto-negotiation disables the advertising of the auto-negotiation for 10BASE-T and 100BASE-T, but auto-negotiation is still advertised and operational for 1GbE. Auto-negotiation cannot be disabled for 1000BASE-X (optical fiber). Deviation from the spec would mean such kit is Ethernet-like. An ability to set auto-negotiation one way in the user interface while leaving the hardware in a different - standards conforming - state is possible. Fiber is not a CSMA/CD medium, it's a Point to Point medium - Duplex is meaningless. I've been referring to the Spec of 10/100 ports. For Gigabit ports 1000Base-T, auto-negotiation is mandatory. Quoting from Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonegotiation] Interoperability problems The first version of the autonegotiation specification, IEEE 802.3u, was open to different interpretations. Although most manufacturers implemented this standard in one way, some others, including network giant Cisco, implemented it in a different way. Autonegotiation between devices that implemented it differently failed. This led many network administrators to not depend on autonegotiation and instead manually set the speed and duplex mode of each network interface card. Even Cisco recommended its customers not to use autonegotiation. However, the use of manually set configuration often led to duplex mismatches, in particular when two connected devices are: * One manually set to half duplex and one manually set to full duplex * One set to autonegotiation and one manually set to full duplex * Both sides manually set to full duplex where one side still expects an autonegotiating link partner and the other side has autonegotiation completely disabled (the side that expects an autonegotiating link partner will fall back to half duplex because it does not detect a partner capable of full duplex)^[/citation needed/] Duplex mismatch problems are difficult to diagnose because the network is apparently working, and simple programs used for network tests such as ping report a valid connection; however, the network is much slower than expected. The debatable portions of the autonegotiation specifications were eliminated by the 1998 release of 802.3. This was later followed by the release of IEEE 802.3ab in 1999. The new standard specified that gigabit Ethernet over copper wiring requires autonegotiation. Currently, all network equipment manufacturers—including Cisco^[3] —recommend to use autonegotiation on all access ports. Cisco also recommends that you check back with them yearly for any potential changes in their recommendation as this has caused much confusion over the years. ^[4] In some large installations that have had to deal with negotiation issues, network staff may believe that autonegotiation doesn't work, and consider turning it off a best-practice. This should be avoided - once autonegotiation is turned off, it will not work by definition, creating a self-enforcing problem. -- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086 NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131 GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693 Business Email: giles.cooc...@netsecspec.co.uk Email/MSN/Live Messenger: gi...@coochey.net Skype: gilescoochey smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Show your CentOS Support
On 07/10/2011 03:35 AM, Always Learning wrote: Should we be paying a reasonable fee plus postage for each t-shirt ? The fee could go towards the expenses of the Centos Project. That is a good idea, however these specific T-Shirts were contributed, and I would much rather they get widespread dispersion than bring in funds. What would be a better idea is if someone wants to step up and sponsor another 100 or so, and I would be happy to keep this process running ( ie. ship them out to people against cost of postage ) I'm willing to pay for the tee-shirt, the postage and make an excellent suggestion for KB to use, not jiffy bags (padded envelopes) but the very thin, secure and self-sealing film-type mailing envelopes which weigh virtually nothing. An advantage when sending goods abroad (externally). I'll look into that - I just prefered these ones since they seemed a bit sturdy. Regards, - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On 10/07/2011 10:40, Ron Blizzard wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote: Can your company afford to be without your apps and data for a couple of weeks, while some hacker organisation has it? I think not. But it's not like you can't do both. The Cloud has the benefits of convenience (available from anywhere) and flexibility (OS agnostic). You would hope 1) That people back up their work (at least to other locations in the Cloud), and 2) That they have a local substitute suite of applications. And it's not like local machines are immune to hardware and security break downs, especially for the majority who use Windows. Well, do both then, but at double the cost!! The whole point to CEOs and CFOs about going with the Cloud is that they will save money on IT infrastructure and possibly get rid of 'that scruffy guy in the basement 'who's done our IT for the last few years'... they never really trusted him anyway, and 'Joe and Bill' from 'ABC Cloud Consulting' seemed like 'my kind of people on the Golf course last Thursday afternoon.' At this point my music is stored online (Amazon, listening to it now), a lot of my documents are created with Google Docs or Zoho, my email is almost completely online (has been for years), my recent pictures are stored and edited online (Picasa and Piknic), almost all my TV watching is done online (Hulu, Crackle, TheWB) and a big chunk of my movies are supplied from online sources (Hulu, Crackle, Netflix). I'm not really referring to your music, movies and porn. I'm referring to the enterprise applications that corporations use. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Show your CentOS Support
On 07/09/2011 07:52 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: If you would like one, please send me an email Still have about 15 un-allocated.. I will be in touch with everyone who emailed about the T-Shirts in about 5 - 7 days time, with costs. It looks like a fair few ( 40 or so ) are heading to the US. And it might be a good idea to just ship the lot over to someone who can then further distribute locally. Makes me quite happy that we even had 1 request from Antartica, the Argentinian Geological expidition :) Good thing their postal adderess isnt Antartica though. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Always Learning cen...@u6.u22.net wrote: Hoi Rudi, CentOS is great as a server OS, but it won't replace our accountant's Windows 7 desktop - the amount of technical compatibilies issues we're going to sit with is just not worth it. Don't use a jack hammer to drive in a nail :) Centos 5.5 works well for my non-computer literate friends who use a computer for Facebook and web browsing. I never said CentOS won't work great for this. But, try and convert someone who uses Pastel Accounting, Quickbooks, Lightroom, AutoCAD, Adobe Premier, etc, to name but a few. The point I'm making is that it won't suit everyone's needs. And yes, I know where you're coming from. Many years ago my mother used to work on a DOS based application in the hospital and when it came to converting their system to Windows 98 (which then used a mouse) it took many months to try and get her to use a mouse. My mother-in-law is not computer literate at all. She has a PC to facebook and play games on. And now matter how many times I've tried to show her how to cut an MP3 CD, she simply can't remember todo it. Now for me to convert her desktop to Linux would be an absolute nightmare. I remember some years ago I converted a guy who used to study MCSE with me (yes, I know.) to Linux. He absolutely LOVED it. I gave him a Suse Live CD - this was about 8 or 9 years ago I think, and then he decided to install it on his PC. Big mistake. He didn't know that to format your Hard Drive means it will completely wipe everything from it. So he lost all his data. We had some words and he wanted to sue me for ruining his business. And yes, the mistake I made, was that I didn't sit next to him 24/7 and spoon fed him. I thought he would be somewhat technically competent to understand what he's going todo with his PC. BUT, he wanted to save money on Microsoft licensing. P.S. Have you every tried to convert a MAC user, specifically a 3D graphic designer to anything other than MAC? Different people have different needs and different applications (and Operating Systems) exist for that exact reason :) I run Windows 7 on on both my laptop and my Desktop cause we have some business applications which won't run on Linux. Yet some of the developers in the office use either Debian, Slackware or CentOS. All our servers though run CentOS, FreeBSD and Solaris. Even my media player and 12TB NAS (my wife is a photographer) at home runs CentOS. I use Centos 5.6 on servers, desktops, home server/desktop, laptop, notebook/netbook and would never willingly return to ghastly M$ Windoze. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. 1 June 2010 Exclusively Centos Gnome. Liberated from M$ Windoze. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote: On 10/07/2011 10:40, Ron Blizzard wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote: Can your company afford to be without your apps and data for a couple of weeks, while some hacker organisation has it? I think not. But it's not like you can't do both. The Cloud has the benefits of convenience (available from anywhere) and flexibility (OS agnostic). You would hope 1) That people back up their work (at least to other locations in the Cloud), and 2) That they have a local substitute suite of applications. And it's not like local machines are immune to hardware and security break downs, especially for the majority who use Windows. Well, do both then, but at double the cost!! The whole point to CEOs and CFOs about going with the Cloud is that they will save money on IT infrastructure and possibly get rid of 'that scruffy guy in the basement 'who's done our IT for the last few years'... they never really trusted him anyway, and 'Joe and Bill' from 'ABC Cloud Consulting' seemed like 'my kind of people on the Golf course last Thursday afternoon.' I get your point about CEOs and CFOs (greed blunts good sense in many instances), but don't most corporations already have local and network backups? So they are already redundant. If they go to the Cloud I would assume they would continue local backups. At this point my music is stored online (Amazon, listening to it now), a lot of my documents are created with Google Docs or Zoho, my email is almost completely online (has been for years), my recent pictures are stored and edited online (Picasa and Piknic), almost all my TV watching is done online (Hulu, Crackle, TheWB) and a big chunk of my movies are supplied from online sources (Hulu, Crackle, Netflix). I'm not really referring to your music, movies and porn. I'm referring to the enterprise applications that corporations use. Porn? You trying to piss me off, pal, with your dismissive bullshit? Quit projecting. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On 10/07/2011 11:22, Ron Blizzard wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote: Well, do both then, but at double the cost!! The whole point to CEOs and CFOs about going with the Cloud is that they will save money on IT infrastructure and possibly get rid of 'that scruffy guy in the basement 'who's done our IT for the last few years'... they never really trusted him anyway, and 'Joe and Bill' from 'ABC Cloud Consulting' seemed like 'my kind of people on the Golf course last Thursday afternoon.' I get your point about CEOs and CFOs (greed blunts good sense in many instances), but don't most corporations already have local and network backups? So they are already redundant. If they go to the Cloud I would assume they would continue local backups. (offsite) Backups are usually sold as part of the Cloud service. The very fact that the data is not locally stored anymore makes local backups not very feasible anyway. Many corporations are considering moving their entire infrastructure to cloud or 'cloud-like' services. Just look at http://www.microsoft.com/office365 It is not being sold as an add-on to enterprise infrastructure, it's being sold as a replacement. The reference to 'porn' was meant to be a light hearted reference to 'your personal stuff', as opposed to 'your work stuff'. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote: The reference to 'porn' was meant to be a light hearted reference to 'your personal stuff', as opposed to 'your work stuff'. Okay, you've made good points. Sorry about over-reacting. I'll eventually learn that a CentOS desktop is the exception and try to think in terms of servers. Though I think this thread was basically started as a call to promoting CentOS on the desktop. Again, please accept my apology. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On 10/07/2011 11:40, Ron Blizzard wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Giles Coocheygi...@coochey.net wrote: The reference to 'porn' was meant to be a light hearted reference to 'your personal stuff', as opposed to 'your work stuff'. Okay, you've made good points. Sorry about over-reacting. I'll eventually learn that a CentOS desktop is the exception and try to think in terms of servers. Though I think this thread was basically started as a call to promoting CentOS on the desktop. Maybe, perhaps I'm blabbering on in the wrong thread. On the desktop side of things, I do like to run Centos full screen in a VM sometimes and I find the Linux environment does help to focus my mind on things a little - especially when trying to tackle a technical issue, whereas Windows 7 (my VM host environment), seems to provide me with a lot of distractions that seem to fog my mind when I'm trying to think about and resolve things on a technical level. Again, please accept my apology. No apology required. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 12:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: On Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:35 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, July 08, 2011 12:01:36 PM Christopher Chan wrote: Professional Wireless Router? That knocked me off my seat :-D. 'Wireless router' has become associated in my mind with that device you put in homes. So what professional wireless routers are out there? Cisco has a few; see the ISR G2 1941W for one that is a 'cut above' the former Linksys product lines. Larger Cisco ISR's (2900 and 3900 series) support a network module that acts as a supervisor of sorts for Cisco access points, too. /me shrugs. I am happy as a fish in water with them Aerohive 340 APs and HP 2910al PoE+ switches. Lifetime warranty, downloadable firmware for the switches and the access points have proven to be pain free once setup. No blooming uber expensive support contract to deal with. Those can be marked as Office applications, but not the professional. What are you blabbering about? What Office applications? Professional link Today would be those that can pass 150Mbps of *real* throughtput with full routing up to the distance of 30km, or 75Mbps up to 55km. And it can be done under 1000 EUR ($1500) without large batteries, solar chargers or similar accessory gear. And those routers/AP's that are rated 300Mbps and have 100Mbps LAN and weak CPU. heh. Excuse me? We are talking about WIFI and not just wireless 'wan' links right? In any case, I suspect that the Aerohive 340 can do uber km too with a change to directional antennae and other stuff to boost signal quality. BTW, if you are implying that the Aerohive only has FastEthernet ports, you are dead wrong. They have dual Gigabit ports, have done 20MiB/sec transfers on a single host, support up to 40 clients simultaneously and these were the results in the UAT. A bit short of their claim of 60 clients simultaneously but that is probably human error...we did not have 60 persons to simultaneously click the file download but we managed to get 40 going at the same time. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to enable Flow Control on CentOS?
On 07/10/11 1:46 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: Fiber is not a CSMA/CD medium, it's a Point to Point medium - Duplex is meaningless. so is twisted pair. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to enable Flow Control on CentOS?
On 10/07/2011 12:57, John R Pierce wrote: On 07/10/11 1:46 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: Fiber is not a CSMA/CD medium, it's a Point to Point medium - Duplex is meaningless. so is twisted pair. ha... ha... of course, interesting. I guess what I was trying to say is that for fiber connections duplex has no meaning, was there ever a fiber 'hub' where multiple point to point connections 'shared' a medium? (in a virtual sense) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bond0 performance issues in 5.6
I've got two gigabit ethernet interfaces bonded in CentOS 5.6. I've set miimode=1000 and I've tried mode= 0, 4 and 6. I've not been able to get better than 112MB/sec, which is the same as the non-bonded interfaces. Most people misunderstand bonding/link aggregation. A single conversation travels over one link to avoid tcp reordering, link aggregation helps with multiple conversations if setup in non FT modes only. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6
Thanks for your note. I'll wait for the final result. I trust fully in the development team. Mainly by the work done so far and stability achieved. Em 09-07-2011 14:32, Karanbir Singh escreveu: Hi, On 07/09/2011 05:23 PM, Edson - PMSS wrote: I really like CentOS, but it is undeniable the delay in the release of version 6.0. yes, we all clearly take that on board - I hope the changes we are bringing in helps clear that, and prevent this sort of a situation. But there are still lots of places for improvements, and over the next few months lets try and address all of those. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Edson D. Amaral Pref. Mun. de São Sebastião - SP (12) 3891-2044 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6
On 7/10/2011 8:15 AM, Edson - PMSS wrote: Thanks for your note. I'll wait for the final result. I trust fully in the development team. Mainly by the work done so far and stability achieved. Em 09-07-2011 14:32, Karanbir Singh escreveu: Hi, On 07/09/2011 05:23 PM, Edson - PMSS wrote: I really like CentOS, but it is undeniable the delay in the release of version 6.0. yes, we all clearly take that on board - I hope the changes we are bringing in helps clear that, and prevent this sort of a situation. But there are still lots of places for improvements, and over the next few months lets try and address all of those. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos What innovations will Cent 6 bring to the party in your opinion? --Hal. -- Hal Davison Observe Goal, Set the course, Burn the map Davison Consulting This correspondence was composed using Dragon Speaking Version 10 Peg#: 2007011701 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS and Bandwidth
I am looking forward to using CentOS 6 soon. I have the torrent running to download and help others download it. I am trying out Scientific Linux 6 while awaiting the arrival of CentOS 6. It took a lot of work to get it installed and configured on a system. I plan to run them both on 2 systems and see what happens. I look forward to the release of CentOS 6.1 soon also. Let me know where I can browse to see if I can help in any areas other than the torrent. If I have a T1 size pipe going out what is my max possible kB out? I have the torrent turned up to 100kB and my VPN still seems responsive. Thanks for all the hard working in getting this release ready. Good job on getting CentOS 5.6 out first however. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6
On 07/10/2011 03:10 PM, Hal Davison wrote: What innovations will Cent 6 bring to the party in your opinion? http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2010/new-standard.html Regards, Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Bandwidth
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Michael Peterson Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 9:15 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS and Bandwidth I am looking forward to using CentOS 6 soon. I have the torrent running to download and help others download it. I am trying out Scientific Linux 6 while awaiting the arrival of CentOS 6. It took a lot of work to get it installed and configured on a system. I plan to run them both on 2 systems and see what happens. I look forward to the release of CentOS 6.1 soon also. Let me know where I can browse to see if I can help in any areas other than the torrent. If I have a T1 size pipe going out what is my max possible kB out? I have the torrent turned up to 100kB and my VPN still seems responsive. Thanks for all the hard working in getting this release ready. Good job on getting CentOS 5.6 out first however. == 1,540,000 (bps) / 8 * .90 = your maximum throughput in Bps. thanks, -Drew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Patrick Lists centos-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl wrote: On 07/10/2011 03:10 PM, Hal Davison wrote: What innovations will Cent 6 bring to the party in your opinion? http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2010/new-standard.html Regards, Patrick It's interesting how that article was released in November 2010 .. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 10:23 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Anyhow, that is my personal impression and opinion, sharpened by many years of double standards, blackmails, attacks, armed conflicts, corrupted politicians and common thieves masked as fighters for democracy, civil and ascended NGO's telling us we are all bunch of murderers, etc., my country (Serbia) had endured (and still endures) in last 20 years, all because we refused to surrender to NATO. In first world war we lost 1/3 of the population fighting against Axis countries. In second we lost 1/4 of population fighting against same Axis and bombings of western side of Alied forces at the end of the war. Then in 1990 we endured western-intelligence-agencies-enticed civil war. Then we were bombed in operation Merciful Angel in 1999 that bombed our hospitals with cassette and uranium bombs, and you are now telling me that world is in fact pink and corporations all play fair... If I am wrong than I will have to start visiting shrink(s). Having been very emotional distraught circa 1992-1994 when I repeatedly argued passionately with my work colleagues that western (i.e. British) aircraft attacking Serbian tanks and artillery would stop the massacre of thousands of civilians from all parts of Yugoslavia, I wish to assert that genocide and mass murders by any bunch of people is fundamentally wrong. It is still happening today in Africa and probably elsewhere. I saw the horrific scenes from Yugoslavia on television night after night while the rest of the world was uncaring and inactive despite the urgency of a determined military response to protect the civilians. When limited UN Forces intervened, I remember with pride a British army colonel (now a Conservative MP (member of the British Parliament)) angrily telling the murdering military that unless they stopped he would instruct his force to open fire on them. I visited Beograd during the UN sanctions and witnessed the run-down conditions and the ad hoc petrol filling stations along the main roads - cars parked at 90 degrees to the road with a large plastic container on the bonnet. They said Hungarian petrol (bezine) was best because it contained less water. I stayed at the Beograd hotel where people were gunned-down. I had a meeting in a building in the middle of the freezing winter with all the windows wide open because the stench of dead bodies from the floor beneath us was overpowering. I am glad peace has come and I hope Europe never ever again tolerates such a shameful period in its history. Being friends, working together and respecting others is best. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:46 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Also worth mentioning is that there is Kaspersky for Linux Workstations and Servers, and even for the Mac: http://www.kaspersky.com/applications_list Aw, nobody put in a word for NOD32 from Eset? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
Christopher Chan wrote: On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:46 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Also worth mentioning is that there is Kaspersky for Linux Workstations and Servers, and even for the Mac: http://www.kaspersky.com/applications_list Aw, nobody put in a word for NOD32 from Eset? Well, I place it between Kaspersky KIS and above the rest. Some people do love it because of the ease of cracking it's license :-D . Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 09:52 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:46 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Also worth mentioning is that there is Kaspersky for Linux Workstations and Servers, and even for the Mac: http://www.kaspersky.com/applications_list Aw, nobody put in a word for NOD32 from Eset? Well, I place it between Kaspersky KIS and above the rest. Some people do love it because of the ease of cracking it's license :-D . Really? Talk about irony. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
John R. Dennison wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:23:57AM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Diatribe about Serbia removed. Is this really the appropriate list for this type of political pontification? I was one mail away from being shunned as just another crackpot conspiracy theorist because I always look for ulterior motives. People who never been exposed to systematic lying can not comprehend the dept of lies or deceptions and are quick to dismiss anything that is not in their comfort zone. So my intention was to say that I been through a lot since I was 16-17, lied or deceived constantly and in order to stay sane and safe learned to view any appearance from multiple standpoints. But if I had said it like my last sentence, I would be challenged that it could not be so bad and that I must indeed be paranoid. So I added just a small part of what is sitting on my back and forming my opinion. The actual point I wanted to make is not what western world has done to my country, that has been, is now (Libya for instance) and will be, and I am not moping about that. But looking from the other side of the presented truth (by corporate media) I have witnessed deliberate and opened lies from every single news media from *every* country including mine and from politicians and corporations, so perception that (even) Red Hat is not trying to undermine those he sees as enemies/competitors is for me false. Since I can only speak from personal experience, I focused on events in my former and current country. For next few paragraphs forget parties involved and weigh the facts. This is can bee found somewhere on the net. For example, one picture from Bosnian war where you see Serbian soldiers in in front of the barb wire and hungry civilians behind it was presented to entire world as horrible genocide comparable to Nazi's. Truth: Serbian television responded to that picture by broadcasting video footage of that same barb wire at the same time at the same place. Video showed soldiers standing *inside* the small open storage surrounded by barb wire and civilians standing around it leaning on to the wire and talking to the members of the press, both western and local. Civilians were some starved refugees given food and crud shelter. I am sure you can find countless examples just like this one, in each war and on the every side of those wars. I for one have seen numerous accounts in last 20 years only in 600km radius (ex Yugoslavia). But we are oblivious to them and believe news media unless we actually witness some open lie, at witch time we forever stop trusting people explicitly. I hope this clears things a bit and convince you I was focusing on deception and not the any political agenda. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 05:50 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: I must be the only one keeping entire/beggining of the conversation in mind why replying. Either that or I am nutz. Which one would you have us believe? :p But seriously, one thing you have to understand is that threads always drift. People have different takes on what it is that is in the way of the mass adoption of the Linux desktop. Everybody has their pet app that would singlehandedly put Linux on the desktop. Like 3D Pinball. /me ducks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 10:41 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: The actual point I wanted to make is not what western world has done to my country, that has been, is now (Libya for instance) and will be, and I am not moping about that. But looking from the other side of the presented truth (by corporate media) I have witnessed deliberate and opened lies from every single news media from *every* country including mine and from politicians and corporations, so perception that (even) Red Hat is not trying to undermine those he sees as enemies/competitors is for me false. I hope this clears things a bit and convince you I was focusing on deception and not the any political agenda. Redhat does not try to undermine enemies/competitors. They get open source and GPL and they have an entire business model based on these two concepts. They do not need to undermine anybody because that is impossible with open source and especially so with software under GPL. Redhat has gone BEYOND the GPL. The GPL only requires that you make the source and build scripts available to those that you distribute to. Nor are you required to make the source/build scripts available for free. The fact that you can get your grubby hands on the source rpms without even downloading RHEL let alone use/install RHEL is testimony to the fact that Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
Always Learning wrote: Having been very emotional distraught circa 1992-1994 when I repeatedly argued passionately with my work colleagues that western (i.e. British) aircraft attacking Serbian tanks and artillery would stop the massacre of thousands of civilians from all parts of Yugoslavia, I wish to assert that genocide and mass murders by any bunch of people is fundamentally wrong. It is still happening today in Africa and probably elsewhere. I will be very brief, but we can communicate off-list. That was misconception. JNA, Yugoslav army, was at that time multi-national, mixed on purpose from all sides of the country. In Slovenia, first to secede, JNA soldiers were sent in tanks without ammunition and were gunned down by sedition soldiers. I saw the horrific scenes from Yugoslavia on television night after night while the rest of the world was uncaring and inactive despite the urgency of a determined military response to protect the civilians. Civilians were fighting each other. JNA was actually a buffer at the first part of the civil war but was attacked for their superior weapons. When limited UN Forces intervened, I remember with pride a British army colonel (now a Conservative MP (member of the British Parliament)) angrily telling the murdering military that unless they stopped he would instruct his force to open fire on them. I visited Beograd during the UN sanctions and witnessed the run-down conditions and the ad hoc petrol filling stations along the main roads - cars parked at 90 degrees to the road with a large plastic container on the bonnet. They said Hungarian petrol (bezine) was best because it contained less water. I stayed at the Beograd hotel where people were gunned-down. I had a meeting in a building in the middle of the freezing winter with all the windows wide open because the stench of dead bodies from the floor beneath us was overpowering. That must have been some organized crime related shooting. Belgrade was 200km away from fighting. I am glad peace has come and I hope Europe never ever again tolerates such a shameful period in its history. Being friends, working together and respecting others is best. I totally agree on this one. I apologies for such off-topic violation to everybody, I am done with this tread on-list. Please send replies to my personal mail if you feel the need to respond. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
Christopher Chan wrote: But seriously, one thing you have to understand is that threads always drift. People have different takes on what it is that is in the way of the mass adoption of the Linux desktop. Everybody has their pet app that would singlehandedly put Linux on the desktop. Like 3D Pinball. /me ducks. Oh, I know that. And I also know I am too smart for my own good. Otherwise I would already have several kids and would be blissfully unaware of deeper issues of the world. /me sight Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 16:41 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: For example, one picture from Bosnian war where you see Serbian soldiers in in front of the barb wire and hungry civilians behind it was presented to entire world as horrible genocide comparable to Nazi's. Truth: Serbian television responded to that picture by broadcasting video footage of that same barb wire at the same time at the same place. Video showed soldiers standing *inside* the small open storage surrounded by barb wire and civilians standing around it leaning on to the wire and talking to the members of the press, both western and local. Civilians were some starved refugees given food and crud shelter. Journalists - some are good, some insipid and crap and some are bad - have been known to deliberately pose photographs. Some of these fakes have been deliberately misleading. Some of the fakes were motivated by a genuine desire to attempt to convey the seriousness of a situation which they were able to photograph or film themselves. The war, hopefully the last in Europe, is over. We can not live in the past. Now is time for reconciliation and peace. Soon Serbia will be the 30th? member of the European Union. Remember the words to the EU anthem about brothers (Ode to Joy from Ludwig van Beethoven's 9th Symphony. Van Beethoven is a Dutch name yet Beethoven, born in Bonn, was a German.) European Unity means peace. Best regards, Paul. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 22:55 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: The fact that you can get your grubby hands on the source rpms Hey, his hands were clean :-) -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
Christopher Chan wrote: On Sunday, July 10, 2011 10:41 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: The actual point I wanted to make is not what western world has done to my country, that has been, is now (Libya for instance) and will be, and I am not moping about that. But looking from the other side of the presented truth (by corporate media) I have witnessed deliberate and opened lies from every single news media from *every* country including mine and from politicians and corporations, so perception that (even) Red Hat is not trying to undermine those he sees as enemies/competitors is for me false. I hope this clears things a bit and convince you I was focusing on deception and not the any political agenda. Redhat does not try to undermine enemies/competitors. They get open source and GPL and they have an entire business model based on these two concepts. They do not need to undermine anybody because that is impossible with open source and especially so with software under GPL. Redhat has gone BEYOND the GPL. The GPL only requires that you make the source and build scripts available to those that you distribute to. Nor are you required to make the source/build scripts available for free. The fact that you can get your grubby hands on the source rpms without even downloading RHEL let alone use/install RHEL is testimony to the fact that Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. I see it as excellent business model that helped them be where they are now. The benefit for us/world is indisputable, and I am deeply grateful for that, but be aware that their business is based on giving *service* to their customers, and that board of directors is responsible for bringing ever increasing profit margin to their shareholders. They have found excellent balance, but were pressed from Oracle and they needed more time to distinctively separate from the crowd so customers are reminded that they *are* the leader. But it is only my view of the events, and I might be wrong. Or we both might be partially right. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
Always Learning wrote: The war, hopefully the last in Europe, is over. We can not live in the past. Now is time for reconciliation and peace. Soon Serbia will be the 30th? member of the European Union. Remember the words to the EU anthem about brothers (Ode to Joy from Ludwig van Beethoven's 9th Symphony. Van Beethoven is a Dutch name yet Beethoven, born in Bonn, was a German.) AFAIK, Europe will ask us to give up on our province Kosovo in order to enter the Union. If Europe do that, there is not a single Serbian politician brave enough to accept that and end his carrier if not even his life. Please lets go off-list with this. Thanks. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
Christopher Chan wrote: Redhat has gone BEYOND the GPL. The GPL only requires that you make the source and build scripts available to those that you distribute to. Nor are you required to make the source/build scripts available for free. The fact that you can get your grubby hands on the source rpms without even downloading RHEL let alone use/install RHEL is testimony to the fact that Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. 1. Red Hat, commercially, has to survive as a financially viable entity. Meaning it must make a profit. 2. Competitors especially large ones like Oracle potentially, if not actually, threaten Red Hat's profit making ability. The potential or actual damage to Red Hat's profits may be small but the more established Oracle's Red Hat Linux becomes, the greater the financial damage to the essential profit making ability of Red Hat. Reduced profits at Red Hat can adversely affect Red Hat's operation and inevitably Centos will suffer to our detriment. 3. Therefore, contrary to your assertion Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. Red Hat must always consider how to undermine any would be enemy/competitor because, ultimately, Red Hat's own survival depends on exactly that type of action. No profits = No Red Hat. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
Always Learning wrote: 3. Therefore, contrary to your assertion Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. Red Hat must always consider how to undermine any would be enemy/competitor because, ultimately, Red Hat's own survival depends on exactly that type of action. No profits = No Red Hat. Hey, you are on my side. You should be replying to Chan, not me :-D you: sorry me: it's ok, no harm done (just to save few mails ;-) ) Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 17:29 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Hey, you are on my side. We are Europeans so we should be bothers AND we both like Centos :-) -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:31 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 17:29 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Hey, you are on my side. We are Europeans so we should be bothers AND we both like Centos :-) OH yes, you lot should be BOTHERS. :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:23 PM, Always Learning wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Redhat has gone BEYOND the GPL. The GPL only requires that you make the source and build scripts available to those that you distribute to. Nor are you required to make the source/build scripts available for free. The fact that you can get your grubby hands on the source rpms without even downloading RHEL let alone use/install RHEL is testimony to the fact that Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. 1. Red Hat, commercially, has to survive as a financially viable entity. Meaning it must make a profit. 2. Competitors especially large ones like Oracle potentially, if not actually, threaten Red Hat's profit making ability. The potential or actual damage to Red Hat's profits may be small but the more established Oracle's Red Hat Linux becomes, the greater the financial damage to the essential profit making ability of Red Hat. Reduced profits at Red Hat can adversely affect Red Hat's operation and inevitably Centos will suffer to our detriment. 3. Therefore, contrary to your assertion Redhat does not need to and has never tried to undermine any would be enemy/competitor. Think about it. Red Hat must always consider how to undermine any would be enemy/competitor because, ultimately, Red Hat's own survival depends on exactly that type of action. No profits = No Red Hat. Redhat closing their bugzilla to clients only or merging all patches to the kernel they maintain for RHEL into one and sans comments is undermining the competition? Oracle can still get the source rpm and rebuild the very same kernel that Redhat puts out there. Redhat making Oracle do their own legwork as respects kernel maintenance and finding/fixing bugs outside of Redhat knowledge is undermining the competition? You just don't get Redhat do you? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 05:12 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 02:05:26PM -0700, Craig White wrote: The reality is that applications are becoming more and more web based SAAS and as the costs of specific applications needed on specific platforms (ie, Quickbooks) rise, web based SAAS will replace them. The point is that for end users, the OS is eventually going to become irrelevant. Tell that to the gamers that drive computer sales and technology advances. /me rotfl. How big is the PC gaming market again? Compared to that of the console gaming market and other software markets. Oh, and the fact that crap like the Intel Atom have become rather popular. Where is the blooming mass market HMD? How many gamers play as depicted in .hack? Look at the blow gaming accessories such as joysticks, rudders and throttles have taken. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6
Karanbir Singh mail-lists@... writes: Hi, On 07/09/2011 05:23 PM, Edson - PMSS wrote: I really like CentOS, but it is undeniable the delay in the release of version 6.0. yes, we all clearly take that on board - I hope the changes we are bringing in helps clear that, and prevent this sort of a situation. But there are still lots of places for improvements, and over the next few months lets try and address all of those. - KB Because I needed the 6.0 versions of dhcpd and named for some IPv6 testing I was doing, I grabbed Scientific Linux 6.0 right after it was released. I also signed up for the SL mailing list. A couple of weeks ago (June 20th or so) the SL folks announced the availability of SL 5.6. I would interpret this as the SL team chose to work on 6.0 and left 5.6 for later while the CentOS team worked on 5.6 and left 6.0 for later. I have no insight into what level of support the SL folks get from their sponsoring organization (CERN and Fermilab) but as far as I'm concerned getting the two releases out (5.6 and 6.0) was a dead heat between the two distributions. This is especially true if you consider that the SL team had the benefit of the CentOS team's experience with 5.6. I mention this because it indicates to me that the CentOS process isn't broken. On the other hand, if not getting 5.6 and 6.0 out sooner gets more people involved in helping, it may have long term benefits. These are just my observations on two different teams working to release the same two releases. Carefully consider what changes you make to the release process. Oh yeah, great job guys and, yes, I'll be moving the SL 6 boxes and VMs back to CentOS as time allows mainly because the community just isn't there for SL (most days the mailing list only has a dozen or so posts; most of them not very technical). Cheers, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Show your CentOS Support
Karanbir Singh wrote: hi guys, I have about 80 CentOS T-Shirts, ranging from Medium to 3XL in size. These are the grey T-shirts we can see Ralph, Garry and the guys from hostdime modeling for us at: http://www.karan.org/pics/centos/images/002-IMG_2571.JPG If you would like one, please send me an email on kbsingh at the centos.org domain, and let me know your address and what size you would want, I would be happy to ship it out to any part of the world as long as you are willing to cover postage costs ( as an example : they fit into jiffy bags that cost £1 at the postoffice, and its about £1.50 shipping per Tshirt to the UK via first class ). First come, first serve! And I will confirm costs before sending them out. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Karanbir, If you still have I would like a 3XL T shirt. I will use it for Software Freedom Day (South Africa) in September where I have had a CentOS table for the past two years. My Address is: Chris Geldenhuis P.O. Box 44002 Linden 2104 Alternatively you could ship it to my daughter at: Mrs A Delcroix, Avenue Bel Horizon 48 Genval, 01332 Belgium I will sort out the cost of the T Shirt and postage with you. TIA ChrisG ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Show your CentOS Support
KB, If you still have an XL size in stock, I would love to get hold of one. Am in B'lore,India. Lemme know payment method you prefer. Best regards Saroj On 7/10/11, Chris Geldenhuis chris.gel...@iafrica.com wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: hi guys, I have about 80 CentOS T-Shirts, ranging from Medium to 3XL in size. These are the grey T-shirts we can see Ralph, Garry and the guys from hostdime modeling for us at: http://www.karan.org/pics/centos/images/002-IMG_2571.JPG If you would like one, please send me an email on kbsingh at the centos.org domain, and let me know your address and what size you would want, I would be happy to ship it out to any part of the world as long as you are willing to cover postage costs ( as an example : they fit into jiffy bags that cost £1 at the postoffice, and its about £1.50 shipping per Tshirt to the UK via first class ). First come, first serve! And I will confirm costs before sending them out. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Karanbir, If you still have I would like a 3XL T shirt. I will use it for Software Freedom Day (South Africa) in September where I have had a CentOS table for the past two years. My Address is: Chris Geldenhuis P.O. Box 44002 Linden 2104 Alternatively you could ship it to my daughter at: Mrs A Delcroix, Avenue Bel Horizon 48 Genval, 01332 Belgium I will sort out the cost of the T Shirt and postage with you. TIA ChrisG ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Sent from my mobile device ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] question about release prm for 6
Hi, I am running centos x686 and upgraded from 4 to 5 when it came out now I want to try the same with centos 6 where can I get the centos i686 release rpm I used does not have the rpm I used any help wood be greatfull ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6
On 7/11/11, Mike Cutie and Maia msto...@centurylink.net wrote: Hi, I am running centos x686 and upgraded from 4 to 5 when it came out now I want to try the same with centos 6 where can I get the centos i686 release rpm I used does not have the rpm I used any help wood be greatfull It's usually not recommended that you upgrade from one major version to another i.e. 4.x to 5.x and 5.x to 6.x, although it might work, there's a high chance of breaking things. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Upgrade from CentOS 5.x to 6.0
Great news about CentOS 6.0 being available, and I figured I'd ask the most obvious question, what can I expect when upgrading from CentOS 5.6 to 6.0? I have not had to go from one major version of CentOS to another so this is new territory for me. Is the processes just like an install except there's an Upgrade option? Does an upgrade do a yum update of everything installed? Most of my systems use EPEL and some the IUS repos...is there a way during the upgrade to just upgrade system components and leave things like PHP, httpd and MySQL alone for now? Any suggestions on monitoring the upgrade progress via syslog or some other method so I can see exactly what is being done during the upgrade? Thanks - Trey ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6
Just so you know, I believe almost all mirrors have 6.0 on their disks. On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:28 PM, David G. Miller d...@davenjudy.org wrote: Karanbir Singh mail-lists@... writes: Hi, On 07/09/2011 05:23 PM, Edson - PMSS wrote: I really like CentOS, but it is undeniable the delay in the release of version 6.0. yes, we all clearly take that on board - I hope the changes we are bringing in helps clear that, and prevent this sort of a situation. But there are still lots of places for improvements, and over the next few months lets try and address all of those. - KB Because I needed the 6.0 versions of dhcpd and named for some IPv6 testing I was doing, I grabbed Scientific Linux 6.0 right after it was released. I also signed up for the SL mailing list. A couple of weeks ago (June 20th or so) the SL folks announced the availability of SL 5.6. I would interpret this as the SL team chose to work on 6.0 and left 5.6 for later while the CentOS team worked on 5.6 and left 6.0 for later. I have no insight into what level of support the SL folks get from their sponsoring organization (CERN and Fermilab) but as far as I'm concerned getting the two releases out (5.6 and 6.0) was a dead heat between the two distributions. This is especially true if you consider that the SL team had the benefit of the CentOS team's experience with 5.6. I mention this because it indicates to me that the CentOS process isn't broken. On the other hand, if not getting 5.6 and 6.0 out sooner gets more people involved in helping, it may have long term benefits. These are just my observations on two different teams working to release the same two releases. Carefully consider what changes you make to the release process. Oh yeah, great job guys and, yes, I'll be moving the SL 6 boxes and VMs back to CentOS as time allows mainly because the community just isn't there for SL (most days the mailing list only has a dozen or so posts; most of them not very technical). Cheers, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from CentOS 5.x to 6.0
Trey Dockendorf wrote: Great news about CentOS 6.0 being available, and I figured I'd ask the most obvious question, what can I expect when upgrading from CentOS 5.6 to 6.0? I have not had to go from one major version of CentOS to another so this is new territory for me. Is the processes just like an install except there's an Upgrade option? Does an upgrade do a yum update of everything installed? Most of my systems use EPEL and some the IUS repos...is there a way during the upgrade to just upgrade system components and leave things like PHP, httpd and MySQL alone for now? Any suggestions on monitoring the upgrade progress via syslog or some other method so I can see exactly what is being done during the upgrade? Thanks - Trey Direct upgrade is NOT supported. You are advised to backup your old system, save all relevant parameters and personal data and do a clean install. I think CentOS 6.0 by default uses etx4 partitions that are better then old ext3, so I would advise total reformat of root partition (*after* backup) and fresh install on newly formated partition. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6
I am ok with that I have it on a test box that I want to try it on first.yy -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Noobadmin Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6 On 7/11/11, Mike Cutie and Maia msto...@centurylink.net wrote: Hi, I am running centos x686 and upgraded from 4 to 5 when it came out now I want to try the same with centos 6 where can I get the centos i686 release rpm I used does not have the rpm I used any help wood be greatfull It's usually not recommended that you upgrade from one major version to another i.e. 4.x to 5.x and 5.x to 6.x, although it might work, there's a high chance of breaking things. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6
Mike Cutie and Maia wrote: I am ok with that I have it on a test box that I want to try it on first.yy -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Noobadmin Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6 On 7/11/11, Mike Cutie and Maia msto...@centurylink.net wrote: Hi, I am running centos x686 and upgraded from 4 to 5 when it came out now I want to try the same with centos 6 where can I get the centos i686 release rpm I used does not have the rpm I used any help wood be greatfull It's usually not recommended that you upgrade from one major version to another i.e. 4.x to 5.x and 5.x to 6.x, although it might work, there's a high chance of breaking things. Bare in mind that there are number of packages that are replaced with similar product, and number of packages has so new versions that configuration files are not compatible, or will create performance problems. But do as you wish. Ljubomir ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Mike Cutie and Maia wrote: To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org From: Mike Cutie and Maia msto...@centurylink.net Subject: Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6 I am ok with that I have it on a test box that I want to try it on first.yy Is there a Live CD for Centos 6 yet please? Keith - Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about release prm for 6
Am 10.07.2011 23:40, schrieb Keith Roberts: On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Mike Cutie and Maia wrote: Is there a Live CD for Centos 6 yet please? Keith Did you read the release announcement? Probably not. +++ LiveCD and LiveDVD LiveCDs and LiveDVDs for i386 and x86_64 will be released within the next few days. These will bring in the ability to directly install from the livemedia. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Translate Centos Release Notes into your own non-English Language
Centos 6.0 Release Notes are here http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0 Volunteers whose native (or first language) is not English are invited to translate the Release Notes into their own language. There are probably other useful translation tasks to make Centos understandable to people all around the world. Should the Centos Mailing List diversify into non-English language versions ? For example, Chinese (which version?) , Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Serbian etc. etc. ? For example: chin...@centos.org -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Show your CentOS Support
On 07/09/2011 07:52 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: If you would like one, please send me an email Still have about 15 un-allocated.. I will be in touch with everyone who emailed about the T-Shirts in about 5 - 7 days time, with costs. It looks like a fair few ( 40 or so ) are heading to the US. And it might be a good idea to just ship the lot over to someone who can then further distribute locally. Makes me quite happy that we even had 1 request from Antartica, the Argentinian Geological expidition :) Good thing their postal adderess isnt Antartica though. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos KB, I live in Texas; I'll be happy to help Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [SOLVED]--Re: centos 6 (what else? :) :)
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:01:14PM -0400, fred smith wrote: Hi all! My thanks to the Centos team for continuing to slave away on C6 even with all the distractions!!! Just did a test install on my eeepc 901 (on an external drive, til I'm comfortable with it) and find that it doesn't seem to know how to talk to the ralink 2860 wireless chipset. A few months back I did a test install of Scientific Linux 6 and as I recall it (I may be mis-remembering) it just worked. So I enabled EPEL and RPMFUSION but they don't seem to have the driver either. Clues appreciated. Thanks again to all to work on this! Oh well. there's nothing like posting a question to have the question answer itself within about 2 minutes. Found what I need at elrepo. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The eyes of the Lord are everywhere, keeping watch on the wicked and the good. - Proverbs 15:3 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos 6 (what else? :) :)
Hi all! My thanks to the Centos team for continuing to slave away on C6 even with all the distractions!!! Just did a test install on my eeepc 901 (on an external drive, til I'm comfortable with it) and find that it doesn't seem to know how to talk to the ralink 2860 wireless chipset. A few months back I did a test install of Scientific Linux 6 and as I recall it (I may be mis-remembering) it just worked. So I enabled EPEL and RPMFUSION but they don't seem to have the driver either. Clues appreciated. Thanks again to all to work on this! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 (niv) -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to enable Flow Control on CentOS?
On 7/9/11 12:18 PM, Giles Coochey wrote: On 09/07/2011 01:06, Les Mikesell wrote: Turning off negotiation pretty much guarantees problems if anything changes at the other end or you use an unmanaged switch. And the gigabit spec requires auto-negotiation. Let me make it clear - auto-negotiation only works if auto-negotiation is configured on both sides. Errr, auto-negotiation is normally the default. So it to be more clear, it works unless you break it by changing it only on one side. It does not work if one side hard codes the speed and duplex. Both sides have to be set for it to negotiate. Agreeing on speed and duplex ensures that it will work. That means both sides have to know about each other, whereas one side is networking equipment and the other is often host equipment, managed by different sets of people. And there is no need for them to agree/disagree or waste time thinking about it at all. The defaults should work. If something is going to change on the remote end without you knowing, or your provider is using an unmanaged switch then it's time to change provider :-) - they obviously are cheapskates and don't have any change management control on their systems. I'm not talking about 'providers', I'm talking about the people who set up network equipment vs. people who manage hosts. If the people managing the network equipment say negotiation needs to be off they are wrong, even if they claim to be the authority in the debate. Gigabit is different. No, the default of auto-negotiating works there too. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to enable Flow Control on CentOS?
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 22:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: On 7/9/11 12:18 PM, Giles Coochey wrote: Gigabit is different. No, the default of auto-negotiating works there too. In 1000BASE-T, autonegotiation is required, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T Which, in turn, refers to (click through without username required) http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.3-2008_section2.pdf that states (in section 28D.5, part a) that Auto-negotiation in 1000BASE-T is required... -I ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Installing OS on Flash Drive on Server
Hi All, On my gateway server I'm Installing CentOS on a flashdrive. is that a bad idea? the server keep hang, I can ping the server from the LAN and from the internet, the internet connection from LAN to internet is OK but another service is down, ssh, VPN (PPTPD) and another service. Even the console is unresponsive so I have to reset the server. Last time when I still can do SSH to server the / drive is mounted read only, when I try to remount rw it said error write protected but the flash drive itself have no write protection. I'm wondering is using Flashdrive on server OS is a bad idea? anyone have similar experience? thank you. regards, -- - Muhammad Panji http://www.panji.web.id http://www.kurungsiku.com http://sumodirjo.wordpress.com http://www.kurungsiku.web.id http://www.linuxbox.web.id ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Congratulations to the Centos Team for the hard work on Centos 6
I just wanted to say Congratulations and thank you to the Centos Team for all of the work on Centos 6 - I know the last few months have not been easy - but the real benefit will be that Centos 6 will be as good and as stable as Centos 5 has been for me and everyone who has been using it for the past 4 years. It has never a matter of just getting it done - but getting it done right. Thank You Phil -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Congratulations to the Centos Team for the hard work on Centos 6
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Philip L Pinto pi...@dpcomputersolutions.com wrote: I just wanted to say Congratulations and thank you to the Centos Team for all of the work on Centos 6 - I know the last few months have not been easy - but the real benefit will be that Centos 6 will be as good and as stable as Centos 5 has been for me and everyone who has been using it for the past 4 years. It has never a matter of just getting it done - but getting it done right. +1... and thanks. i386 torrent download was very fast (less than an hour) and I have been seeding for two or three hours now. I'll just let it go for at least a few days. -- RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Congratulations to the Centos Team for the hard work on Centos 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philip L Pinto said the following on 11/07/11 06:11: I just wanted to say Congratulations and thank you to the Centos Team for all of the work on Centos 6 - +1 Thank you guys! Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ I keep seeing spots in front of my eyes. Did you ever see a doctor? No, just spots. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4agpEACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZS+owCgo/Hi6jrAm+GkZknVxbxWhG4S NjgAn0N0Gqr9a6baLanarMhlVb9my803 =ofbp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED]--Re: centos 6 (what else? :) :)
On 11/07/11 03:28, fred smith wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:01:14PM -0400, fred smith wrote: Hi all! My thanks to the Centos team for continuing to slave away on C6 even with all the distractions!!! Just did a test install on my eeepc 901 (on an external drive, til I'm comfortable with it) and find that it doesn't seem to know how to talk to the ralink 2860 wireless chipset. A few months back I did a test install of Scientific Linux 6 and as I recall it (I may be mis-remembering) it just worked. So I enabled EPEL and RPMFUSION but they don't seem to have the driver either. Clues appreciated. Thanks again to all to work on this! Oh well. there's nothing like posting a question to have the question answer itself within about 2 minutes. Found what I need at elrepo. Glad you got it working. Yes, for the benefit of others, you needed to install the driver and associated firmware which are available from elrepo.org: http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-rt2860sta http://elrepo.org/tiki/rt2860-firmware Hope that helps (others). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
