[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1500 CentOS 5 x86_64 ixgbe-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1500
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1500.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a0d68877adf6f19c10f2cb09b7b69b05 kmod-ixgbe-rhel5u7-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.x86_64.rpm
bd7f92440047968f6f74cebcbda88055
kmod-ixgbe-xen-rhel5u7-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e3c022c7dd95baa9421abd6b7368823f ixgbe-kmod-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1500 CentOS 5 i386 ixgbe-kmod Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:1500
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1500.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e6157db320fb12508062122d1770c002
kmod-ixgbe-PAE-rhel5u7-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.i686.rpm
69c953ef1602b80066a6d7d3366330b2 kmod-ixgbe-rhel5u7-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.i686.rpm
6bc40814b46c8e370614c01f58c2030d
kmod-ixgbe-xen-rhel5u7-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.i686.rpm
Source:
e3c022c7dd95baa9421abd6b7368823f ixgbe-kmod-3.4.8_k-2.el5_7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1479 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1479 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1479.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
54b398035dea17ea24596d7318082e5f kernel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
9f47520ad3e4b6df13df677282e0129e kernel-debug-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
440b6d5f757b594a2468788055bc46ef
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
85003abc285e6e24740432e5597b993b kernel-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
f7c1894f62dbce6b30f2baab799bf035 kernel-doc-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.noarch.rpm
b301ba4ef800dfb3ccca2882a2931e6c kernel-headers-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
bb464bd427e3f2ea4e7313fde5a5c93e kernel-xen-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
59e08cb936d05a6485a324e7703f4945
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
5e90e3b805b5958eeeabca7aaab442f8 kernel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1479 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1479 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1479.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c9cddf66ef5e516a2d6b501a9d6ee618 kernel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
a3d9919a99daa93726e3009b47533f6b kernel-debug-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
2ceabc9d59b6b93e5a87c56f0f9ee72a
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
8e9f50ec94279539b244930035010cc8 kernel-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
f7c1894f62dbce6b30f2baab799bf035 kernel-doc-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.noarch.rpm
316a0dfc50375ae83f07f2db145bba0a kernel-headers-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i386.rpm
bfee35eb8973b748b4a00f63b9bbf6fb kernel-PAE-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
24ffe13f648c08028918cb6660715dc2 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
da3db00a9862efe454f595a9b5a5440b kernel-xen-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
86d4e1ce80b43379886cf46aa801348f kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.i686.rpm
Source:
5e90e3b805b5958eeeabca7aaab442f8 kernel-2.6.18-274.12.1.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1502 CentOS 5 i386 dump FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1502
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1502.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
ceafc48569634b1853d02ac26f21213c dump-0.4b41-6.el5.i386.rpm
bc176c160465c3a3a4169aa3082edf6b rmt-0.4b41-6.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
d019e223ebd5a54a2917cadda91776c1 dump-0.4b41-6.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1503 CentOS 5 i386 ecryptfs-utils FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm
381f3f7cedff81129f3a1e5d22130774 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-8.el5.i386.rpm
e5618074828996b20d6f93a461614299 ecryptfs-utils-gui-75-8.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
e7cd21968c284fe222cde667597862c2 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1503 CentOS 5 x86_64 ecryptfs-utils FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1503
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1503.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
7b3237947343a7dc3997db354dfbd762 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.i386.rpm
c0b39223824b2154eaefe4d9b0409672 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
381f3f7cedff81129f3a1e5d22130774 ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-8.el5.i386.rpm
d82deed6ca0cf355e607afa70974310a ecryptfs-utils-devel-75-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
33992fcfeb11001c50f508c786f7107a ecryptfs-utils-gui-75-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e7cd21968c284fe222cde667597862c2 ecryptfs-utils-75-8.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1501 CentOS 5 i386 expect FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1501
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
76d357c7b20db1779938eb1e77d0ab3b expect-5.43.0-8.el5.i386.rpm
a85f07b5394b7602e2edd92270f655c7 expect-devel-5.43.0-8.el5.i386.rpm
93e2fa01c6915c5e86d22306940b2a69 expectk-5.43.0-8.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
b4413c506cb127ea2bc90d9b5a0b6b12 expect-5.43.0-8.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1501 CentOS 5 x86_64 expect FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1501
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1501.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
76d357c7b20db1779938eb1e77d0ab3b expect-5.43.0-8.el5.i386.rpm
ce96e5c8cbe578b93228bdf80d9a8b6a expect-5.43.0-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
a85f07b5394b7602e2edd92270f655c7 expect-devel-5.43.0-8.el5.i386.rpm
14591b6cb2d0b4e6d83e8aefcf696962 expect-devel-5.43.0-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
0e04bf2a6b8a4e0f1df9c2cb06066b8c expectk-5.43.0-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b4413c506cb127ea2bc90d9b5a0b6b12 expect-5.43.0-8.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1498 CentOS 5 i386 libusb FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1498
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1498.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7d2661ef76a592b0742f34abc20ba700 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm
6c35a97adc73c5b361b3f56a2c582a45 libusb-devel-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
777676e65ec4fc082288fede115f6202 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1498 CentOS 5 x86_64 libusb FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1498
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1498.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
7d2661ef76a592b0742f34abc20ba700 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm
565c12782b350526c032d83e362f06b5 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.x86_64.rpm
6c35a97adc73c5b361b3f56a2c582a45 libusb-devel-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm
218ae34b10148f97a9e279ace08f74e9 libusb-devel-0.1.12-6.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
777676e65ec4fc082288fede115f6202 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1493 CentOS 5 i386 mrtg FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1493
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1493.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a928902c209606607b244a0cc8ffb5a1 mrtg-2.14.5-4.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
afd657bc241d90cf6601720403a5d67e mrtg-2.14.5-4.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1493 CentOS 5 x86_64 mrtg FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1493
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1493.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
951852f3d933b01c8d48fa88ed417ec5 mrtg-2.14.5-4.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
afd657bc241d90cf6601720403a5d67e mrtg-2.14.5-4.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1497 CentOS 5 i386 procps FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1497
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1497.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
4e47a7b98afec7f8556aecffe365f313 procps-3.2.7-18.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
4e4b7b59601bc1ee09c2980615ee1e9c procps-3.2.7-18.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1497 CentOS 5 x86_64 procps FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1497
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1497.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
cc6d0a292dd960952b6aec6e1f21ce92 procps-3.2.7-18.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
4e4b7b59601bc1ee09c2980615ee1e9c procps-3.2.7-18.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1499 CentOS 5 i386 freeipmi FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1499
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1499.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
1b1603f23cdb1819f3091b13f5b85c17 freeipmi-0.5.1-7.el5.i386.rpm
293768315af2b55422f7bfb25c87cef2 freeipmi-bmc-watchdog-0.5.1-7.el5.i386.rpm
64263ce5e054a44ce4ab0dba05530d3c freeipmi-devel-0.5.1-7.el5.i386.rpm
9b3e6ebfd171583e946dd3824451b506 freeipmi-ipmidetectd-0.5.1-7.el5.i386.rpm
Source:
0f107dda77cc7b0e99d6a7229d6dac94 freeipmi-0.5.1-7.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1505 CentOS 5 x86_64 system-config-bind FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1505
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1505.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
f4e3210bd492fb57ccedd7c9c2a57dd6
system-config-bind-4.0.3-5.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
Source:
d375e8831997de8cec1f7d30396a78dd system-config-bind-4.0.3-5.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2011:1505 CentOS 5 i386 system-config-bind FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1505
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1505.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f4e3210bd492fb57ccedd7c9c2a57dd6
system-config-bind-4.0.3-5.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
Source:
d375e8831997de8cec1f7d30396a78dd system-config-bind-4.0.3-5.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-virt] VM fails to start on host bootup, but starts fine manually. Why?
I have 5 VMs on my host. The first four are setup to start on boot. But only the first three end up running. The fourth has to be started manually. Start virtual machine on host bootup is checked on all four VMs but the fourth VM does not get started on host bootup. After the host boots up, the VM is Shutdown state. If I go into virt-manager and click Run, it starts just fine. I looked in /var/log/xen/ and did not see anything related, but I don't know what I'm looking for. Any suggestions? Best, -at ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] NO responder prueba
-- Este mensaje le ha llegado mediante el servicio de correo electronico que ofrece Infomed para respaldar el cumplimiento de las misiones del Sistema Nacional de Salud. La persona que envia este correo asume el compromiso de usar el servicio a tales fines y cumplir con las regulaciones establecidas Infomed: http://www.sld.cu/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Consulta de java 1.6, mysql 5 y tomcat 6 en centos 4.8
Hola, instalar el jdk de sun no es muy complejo, incluso existen paquetes rpm para instalarlo, aca tienes el link: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk-6u29-download-513648.html MySQL esta en los repositorios de Centos segun sé y Tomcat lo puedes descargar de esta url: http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgi Y solo hay descomprimirlo y ejecutar el demonio, pero en esta url explican algo más...creo :D http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/setup.html Si tienes un apache httpd corriendo entonces si es algo más complejo, pero se puede instalar ambos usando a httpd para llamar a tomcat, suerte -- * Una alegría compartida se transforma en doble alegría; una pena compartida, en media pena. *-- http://alexove.blogspot.com -- Celular (Claro): 984-305721 -- Celular (Movistar): 959-625-001 -- Sigueme en Twitter: http://twitter.com/alleinerwolf -- http://groups.google.com.pe/group/mosoq_kallpa ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
Hi all, I have plan to replace my Centos5.7 VM with newer version. The VM works as our network gateway. I want to ask from your experience, will it be a bad decision? My concern is that since the Mac Address of the gateway will change, will it disrupt the network? How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? Thanks Fajar. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On 11/30/11 12:59 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? within seconds. or faster. and the client's ARP caches expire nearly as fast. its not the switches you care about as much as the DHCP leases for your clients. if you can copy the dhcp leases file over, that will save a lot of grief. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:09 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 11/30/11 12:59 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? within seconds. or faster. and the client's ARP caches expire nearly as fast. its not the switches you care about as much as the DHCP leases for your clients. if you can copy the dhcp leases file over, that will save a lot of grief. Thanks John, I feel a bit relief hearing that. More over, the gateway is a pure one, no dhcp, no other services. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
Vreme: 11/30/2011 10:13 AM, Fajar Priyanto piše: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:09 PM, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 11/30/11 12:59 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? within seconds. or faster. and the client's ARP caches expire nearly as fast. its not the switches you care about as much as the DHCP leases for your clients. if you can copy the dhcp leases file over, that will save a lot of grief. I would suggest installing new gateway as new system, leaving old one to work until new one is ready. That way if something goes wrong you will still have old one to revert to. Just do not give in working IP's until you are ready to switch over. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hello
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote: I am accustomed to give precise answers and directions and expect people not to stray one bit so I can follow you in my mind (professional deformation and defense system), so as long as you follow what I suggest I will help you land on the moon. I am lucky then if you could do this, I would definitely follow your good advices. I hope to get more from you. I am happy that you are having such a nice experience. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Moving server
I want to move my home server over to a new machine, both running CentOS. (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, starting with email. I'm running IMAP on the server, with my email in ~/Maildir/ . I'm wondering what exactly I need to copy to the new machine? Any help or suggestions gratefully received. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On 11/30/2011 10:09 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/30/11 12:59 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? within seconds. or faster. and the client's ARP caches expire nearly as fast. its not the switches you care about as much as the DHCP leases for your clients. if you can copy the dhcp leases file over, that will save a lot of grief. If you want to plug the new system in the same port the old system was plugged in before then depending on the switch and how it is configured it can take 30-60 seconds to change the switch port to a forwarding state. During that time the switch will send put out STP requests to determine if the newly attached device is also a switch. Once these time out it will assume the new device is a regular system and change the port to a forwarding state. You can prevent this by enabline something like PortFast for that port which tells the switch to simply assume that only regular devices will be connected to that port and to immediately change the port to a forwarding state. See for example: http://www.omnisecu.com/cisco-certified-network-associate-ccna/what-is-spanning-tree-protocol-stp-portfast.htm Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving server
On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: I want to move my home server over to a new machine, both running CentOS. (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, starting with email. I'm running IMAP on the server, with my email in ~/Maildir/ . I'm wondering what exactly I need to copy to the new machine? Any help or suggestions gratefully received. If it were me, I'd copy the entire old machine (running 5.7) over to the new machine so that after the copy it was also running 5.7, then upgrade the new machine to 6.0. ...unless you like making things more complicated than they need to be. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving server
On 11/30/2011 06:18 AM, ken wrote: On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: I want to move my home server over to a new machine, both running CentOS. (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, starting with email. I'm running IMAP on the server, with my email in ~/Maildir/ . I'm wondering what exactly I need to copy to the new machine? Any help or suggestions gratefully received. If it were me, I'd copy the entire old machine (running 5.7) over to the new machine so that after the copy it was also running 5.7, then upgrade the new machine to 6.0. ...unless you like making things more complicated than they need to be. An upgrade on the same machine from 5.7 to 6.x is not supported and would always leave behind a bunch of old libraries, etc. The way he is doing it is the correct way (at least as recommended by RH for RHEL and by us for CentOS. http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/ch-upgrade-x86.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving server
Am 30.11.2011 13:45, schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 11/30/2011 06:18 AM, ken wrote: On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: I want to move my home server over to a new machine, both running CentOS. (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, starting with email. I'm running IMAP on the server, with my email in ~/Maildir/ . I'm wondering what exactly I need to copy to the new machine? Any help or suggestions gratefully received. If it were me, I'd copy the entire old machine (running 5.7) over to the new machine so that after the copy it was also running 5.7, then upgrade the new machine to 6.0. ...unless you like making things more complicated than they need to be. An upgrade on the same machine from 5.7 to 6.x is not supported and would always leave behind a bunch of old libraries, etc. yes you have to manually clean up something but since i upgraded 20 servers since F9 to F14 and currently stzart upgrade to F15 via yum this should also work on CentOS and is mostly more painless than searching every piece of configuraion on a new machine since this is a new machine while the old is still there it would be not a problem to test what is happening, on my environments all servers are virtual-machines what makes it all relaxter with a full snapshot signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote: Hi all, I have plan to replace my Centos5.7 VM with newer version. The VM works as our network gateway. I want to ask from your experience, will it be a bad decision? My concern is that since the Mac Address of the gateway will change, will it disrupt the network? How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? Switches normally flood all ports until a new mac is identified so they will work as soon as the link comes up (which may take a few seconds for spanning tree). However, routers to adjacent subnets may cache their arp table for up to 20 minutes. You might have a problem with inbound connections if you don't clear the arp table on whatever is connected as the next hop. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving server
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote: I want to move my home server over to a new machine, both running CentOS. (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, starting with email. I'm running IMAP on the server, with my email in ~/Maildir/ . I'm wondering what exactly I need to copy to the new machine? If you can run both machines during the conversion, I'd bring up the new one, then rsync over the home directories and any other data, making sure the related applications work. If you make changes to the IMAP server, there is an imapcopy utility that will move all mail to a different type of server - or for a few accounts you can just recreate the folder structure from a client, connect to both accounts and drag the messages over, letting the servers take care of the storage/formatting details. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to make nodes in my local LAN see each other's names
On 29.11.2011 20:00, Craig White wrote: On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Timothy Madden wrote: Hello Sorry for the (I guess) simple question, but: I have 7 computers under one 8-port router (D-Link DIR-100, firmware v1.13EU) in my network (actually in a sub-network) and they do not see each other's host names. The router has the 'DNS relay' option enabled, and all 7 computers use the router as the DNS server, which in turn will forward DNS requests to the ISP DNS server. That way I can understand that simple, plain, default DNS is not enough for my boxes to see each-other's names. Windows has a nice (or not) way to resolve the problem: CIFS (Samba) server names are automatically included in the name resolving procedure. I know I can do the same with my CentOS boxes if I install samba on each of them and add 'wins' to the 'hosts: ' line in /etc/nsswitch.conf, but somehow I think installing cifs on every node just to get my local machine names to resolve properly to the IP addresses is not the right way to solve my problem ... What is the way to have all computers in my simple network know each other by name ? Is it possible to have the name resolving procedure used by the system automatically recognize a new machine added to my network, when I try to access it with right host name, like WINS can ? Also, I hear Linux does not have, by default, a cache of resolved names (like Windows does), and I find that to be a sad thing. Why should the default be set so that I contact the ISP DNS server for each and every web page I hit ? Is there an easy way to install a caching name server on my each machine, and make sure my system is using /that server/ to resolve names ? just to clarify some things... NETBIOS is a rather chatty (ie, noisy/traffic generating) for a local subnet. Yes, this can be a convenient way of being able to refer to a computer by its name and the price you pay for that convenience is a fair amount of broadcast traffic by all computers that support this protocol (Windows, Macintosh or Linux using NMBD). NETBIOS does not in any way provide DNS services. It is relegated to the local subnet only and almost always what is designated as non-routed IP space (10.x.x.x, 172.16.x.x, 192.168.x.x) UNIX/Linux has a reasonably simple method for maintaining DNS names in /etc/hosts where you can simply set them, ie 192.168.1.1 srv1 srv1.mydomain 192.168.1.2 srv2 srv2.mydomain etc. You can also do this on Windows systems - edit C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts If you want Dynamic DNS on your LAN, you are going to find that the typical home/SOHO routers are insufficient with short lease times, no memory storage for previously registered DHCP addresses and no ability to actually provide real DNS (other than forwarding to some other DNS server) and thus, no DDNS. Thus if you really want to have dynamic DNS on your local LAN, you would want to install bind and dhcp packages and configure them (not the easiest thing to do but not entirely difficult either). Thank you all for your answers. Indeed, my router (D-Link DIR-100) only does DNS relay and nothing more. It looks like I have to stick to CIFS for now. Editing hosts file manually looks too outdated for me, and I have to edit each hosts file on all my computers when a new computer is added (which just happened a few days ago). A dnsmasq server looks like a better way to handle my problem, but it already requires one of the machines to assume a server role: it needs a static IP and can not benefit from (its own) configuration services, and it must be running for all other machines to be running and see each other. My subnet is Gigabit anyway, so I guess I think I will live with the extra traffic from NetBIOS. I still have one problem, though: somehow my trick to include 'wins' in the 'hosts: ' line in /etc/nsswitch.conf only works when my box uses a static IP ! :( I guess `dhclient´ updates the DNS server lists and the 'resolver' in a way that interferes with the name service switch mechanism (configured from /etc/nsswitch.conf). Is there a way to get the name service switch to use wins, while the DNS configuration is handled by DHCP client ? Thank you, Timothy Madden ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving server
Vreme: 11/30/2011 01:53 PM, Reindl Harald piše: but since i upgraded 20 servers since F9 to F14 and currently stzart upgrade to F15 via yum this should also work on CentOS and is mostly more painless than searching every piece of configuraion on a new machine since this is a new machine while the old is still there it would be not a problem to test what is happening, on my environments all servers are virtual-machines what makes it all relaxter with a full snapshot Fedora upgrades every 6 months so changes are not so big. CentOS 5.x and CentOS 6.x are MUCH more different, there is number of packages that are obsoleted and replaced with packages of same effect but with different config files, file locations, etc. Do what you like, but with such different changes, my servers will be freshly built and clean (I am slated to upgrade them in few weeks.) -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS5 w winbind samba integrated w Win2k8 AD
Is anyone out there using CentOS5 integrated correctly with a Windows 2008 domain so that active directory authentication can be used for samba shares? I have tried the newer RPM's from SERNET up to 3.5 and 3.6 without any luck. The usual behavior is wbinfo returns the active directory users and groups but 'getent passwd' only returns local users. I also tried compiling samba from source but could never get winbind to properly connect. I have tried this with Ubunutu and CentOS6 and both of those just worked. So if this is working for anyone with CentOS5 would you be willing to share your samba version, samba conf and pam setup? I've put a lot of time into it and also worked with the samba mailing lists without any success. Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving server
On 11/30/2011 06:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 30.11.2011 13:45, schrieb Johnny Hughes: On 11/30/2011 06:18 AM, ken wrote: On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: I want to move my home server over to a new machine, both running CentOS. (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) I'm thinking of moving things over one at a time, starting with email. I'm running IMAP on the server, with my email in ~/Maildir/ . I'm wondering what exactly I need to copy to the new machine? Any help or suggestions gratefully received. If it were me, I'd copy the entire old machine (running 5.7) over to the new machine so that after the copy it was also running 5.7, then upgrade the new machine to 6.0. ...unless you like making things more complicated than they need to be. An upgrade on the same machine from 5.7 to 6.x is not supported and would always leave behind a bunch of old libraries, etc. yes you have to manually clean up something but since i upgraded 20 servers since F9 to F14 and currently stzart upgrade to F15 via yum this should also work on CentOS and is mostly more painless than searching every piece of configuraion on a new machine since this is a new machine while the old is still there it would be not a problem to test what is happening, on my environments all servers are virtual-machines what makes it all relaxter with a full snapshot That is the fun thing about being an administrator ... you (we) get to do things the way you (we) want and are comfortable with. I manage a few servers myself and I am much more comfortable, if I have a new machine, to start with only the new binaries on there an to move things over. Other people are likely more comfortable using the linux upgradeany method from the install media. To each their own. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] megaraid/PERC
On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror, I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer to the replacement, so I just shoved them into another Dell server, with a PERC 5 controller - I think that's what the dead one had. I fired up MegaRAID storage manager... but can't see any way to tell it to recreate that RAID. Anyone done this? Probably old news now, but in the PERC card's BIOS you want to import foreign config, save it and restart. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] megaraid/PERC
Ross Walker wrote: On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror, I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer to the replacement, so I just shoved them into another Dell server, with a PERC 5 controller - I think that's what the dead one had. I fired up MegaRAID storage manager... but can't see any way to tell it to recreate that RAID. Anyone done this? Probably old news now, but in the PERC card's BIOS you want to import foreign config, save it and restart. No, it's not old news - thanks! Btw, do you know if it's even possible to do that via the MSM gui? I don't see anything like that in the menus. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to make nodes in my local LAN see each other's names
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 08:54:04 AM Timothy Madden wrote: Is there a way to get the name service switch to use wins, while the DNS configuration is handled by DHCP client ? Yes, there is (or at least should be). While I know some will object strongly to doing it this way, here's how you might be able to do it: 1.) Follow http://bensbits.com/blog/2006/02/02/wins_name_resolution_for_linux/ 2.) If not using NetworkManager, set PEERDNS=no in the appropriate /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX file 3.) If using NetworkManager, or using the GUI config tools, make sure the 'Automatically Obtain DNS Information from provider' is *not* checked 4.) Set up /etc/resolv.conf to point DNS to your router (since that will not happen automatically) or set up the DNS servers in the GUI. Now, I say 'might' simply because I've not personally tried it, since I have a local DNS server set up here and that would not match your particular setup, so even if I got it working you might not, since I do have a DNS server on the LAN. Since you're using these systems as desktops, and since you didn't specify (at least not in this thread; if you did in another thread I apologize) which CentOS you are using, do note that CentOS 5 and CentOS 6 do things quite a bit differently. So YMMV. And please let us know how it turns out, especially for the benefit of those who might be searching this thread a year or two from now with your exact question the second most annoying thing about typical e-mail list threads is that the OP often doesn't come back with what the solution was and to those OP's who do come back with a 'SOLVED' tag in the subject line (or just in the body of the e-mail) and describe what actually fixed their problem, I thank you. (I've already in another thread told my opinion on what the most annoying thing about typical e-mail list threads is, so I'll not repeat that here). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 03:59:58 AM Fajar Priyanto wrote: How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall? There are a couple of things I've run into, mostly in failover situations or in situations where a machine was moved from one switch to another. ARP cache timeouts are an issue for seamless failover; VMware, to use one example of which I am very familiar, does a gratuitous ARP *reply* when doing vmotion from one host to another, and this seems to make the transition very short. I have had cisco routers in particular hang on to ARP caches for a very long time; they aren't necessarily supposed to, but I've seen them hold on well past the configured ARP cache expiry (meaning a bug in IOS) and then requiring either a reload or a manual clearing of the ARP cache to pick it back up. I've also seen cisco Catalyst switches (mostly older ones, like Catalyst 5000 and 5500 series with SupIII/NFFC) hang on to MLS CAM entries if the gateway is replaced with a flow in progress and refuse to let go for a long time. This could conceivably impact any MLS-based catalyst switch, including 6500 series. I also have some 3Com Superstack II switches that have issues with hanging on to CAM entries long after a machine was moved. The longest CAM expiry I've seen has been about three hours, but that was quite a while back when I had an ATM core in my network here (3Com CoreBuilder/CellPlex 7000 core, SS II's and Cisco Catalyst 5500's (with the LANE card; and I typically used the Truckee-based OC12 LANE cards for the various LANE servers since they had the best BUS performance, two orders of magnitude faster than the CB7000's) on the edge). It was less disruptive in those days to just reboot the core and let everything reacquire and let PNNI reroute the VC's for the LANE components. So be prepared to clear ARP caches (since gratuitous ARP is sometimes seen as an attack vector, although it works quite well for VMware vMotion, DRS, and HA) and CAM/TCAM entries if things go awry. The RPMforge/repoforge repository includes the 'garp' package; on the new gateway you could have this garp package installed, and then run garp with the IP address of the old gateway immediately after stopping the old gateway's interface, and that might work. But caution is advised, and YMMV, of course. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
Hey folks, I am sure there must be an easy way to do this. I am currently running 5.3 and yum info db4 tells me that they have version 4.3.29. Is that telling me that this is the version in 5.3? Or that this is the latest version in the 5.x stream? If the former, then how do I find out what release of the db4 software (sleepcat berkeley db) is in 5.7? I don't want to yum upgrade just yet. I have to research a number of things before upgrading, and this is one of them. thanks, -Alan -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
On 11/30/2011 04:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, I am sure there must be an easy way to do this. I am currently running 5.3 and yum info db4 tells me that they have version 4.3.29. Is that telling me that this is the version in 5.3? Or that this is the latest version in the 5.x stream? If the former, then how do I find out what release of the db4 software (sleepcat berkeley db) is in 5.7? I don't want to yum upgrade just yet. I have to research a number of things before upgrading, and this is one of them. thanks, -Alan If you have questions on the 5.7 version why not building a virtual machine and do tests on it? Fabien ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: So be prepared to clear ARP caches (since gratuitous ARP is sometimes seen as an attack vector, although it works quite well for VMware vMotion, DRS, and HA) and CAM/TCAM entries if things go awry. The RPMforge/repoforge repository includes the 'garp' package; on the new gateway you could have this garp package installed, and then run garp with the IP address of the old gateway immediately after stopping the old gateway's interface, and that might work. But caution is advised, and YMMV, of course. Thanks all for all the insights from your experience. Much appreciated. I will do it during weekend when no users are working. (this creates the saying about sysadmin: people work, we work. people rest, we still work). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
On 11/30/2011 10:31 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: On 11/30/2011 04:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, I am sure there must be an easy way to do this. I am currently running 5.3 and yum info db4 tells me that they have version 4.3.29. Is that telling me that this is the version in 5.3? Or that this is the latest version in the 5.x stream? If the former, then how do I find out what release of the db4 software (sleepcat berkeley db) is in 5.7? I don't want to yum upgrade just yet. I have to research a number of things before upgrading, and this is one of them. thanks, -Alan If you have questions on the 5.7 version why not building a virtual machine and do tests on it? To answer your question, yum info or yum upgrade will give you the latest in the 5.x stream. -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to make nodes in my local LAN see each other's names
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Timothy Madden terminato...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you all for your answers. Indeed, my router (D-Link DIR-100) only does DNS relay and nothing more. Errr, unless I'm looking at the wrong online manual, DNS relay does _exactly_ what you want. You just have to give it a local domain name and fill in the dhcp reservation table with the related name/ip/mac sets. The fact that it wants a name in this table should have been a hint. After you've set that up, test it with 'dig @192.168.0.1 name.localdomain'. It looks like I have to stick to CIFS for now. Editing hosts file manually looks too outdated for me, and I have to edit each hosts file on all my computers when a new computer is added (which just happened a few days ago). A dnsmasq server looks like a better way to handle my problem, but it already requires one of the machines to assume a server role: it needs a static IP and can not benefit from (its own) configuration services, and it must be running for all other machines to be running and see each other. The router should do the same thing. Some d-links have bugs, though, so test it and if it doesn't work, check if there is a firmware update for your model. My subnet is Gigabit anyway, so I guess I think I will live with the extra traffic from NetBIOS. The DIR-100 isn't gigabit, so the things connected to its ports are going to 100M. But, that's fast enough for a small net anyway. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
Vreme: 11/30/2011 04:28 PM, Alan McKay piše: Is that telling me that this is the version in 5.3? Or that this is the latest version in the 5.x stream? It's the latest version of the 5.x stream. It looks like it was last changed in 5.5. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:28, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, I am sure there must be an easy way to do this. I am currently running 5.3 and yum info db4 tells me that they have version 4.3.29. Is that telling me that this is the version in 5.3? Or that this is the latest version in the 5.x stream? If the former, then how do I find out what release of the db4 software (sleepcat berkeley db) is in 5.7? I don't want to yum upgrade just yet. I have to research a number of things before upgrading, and this is one of them. Browse a mirror: http://mirror.wiredtree.com/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/db4-4.3.29-10.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm It's very rare that point release update/upgrades within a major version will b0rk anything. That's the point of running an enterprise OS, there shouldn't be any major changes within a release. Testing in a VM like Fabien mentioned is also a pretty good idea. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:37, Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote: On 11/30/2011 10:31 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: On 11/30/2011 04:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, I am sure there must be an easy way to do this. I am currently running 5.3 and yum info db4 tells me that they have version 4.3.29. Is that telling me that this is the version in 5.3? Or that this is the latest version in the 5.x stream? If the former, then how do I find out what release of the db4 software (sleepcat berkeley db) is in 5.7? I don't want to yum upgrade just yet. I have to research a number of things before upgrading, and this is one of them. thanks, -Alan If you have questions on the 5.7 version why not building a virtual machine and do tests on it? To answer your question, yum info or yum upgrade will give you the latest in the 5.x stream. I suggested going directly to a mirror and check, just in case he had the url to 5.3 hard coded in his .repo file. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
Normally I would have a VM for this sort of thing but I still do not have a machine available for that and I'm hesitant to put VMWare Server on one of my production machines. I'm new here and have already flagged that I need a box for VMs - hoping to have something in place by this time next week. Thanks all for your help! -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:32:24 AM Fajar Priyanto wrote: Thanks all for all the insights from your experience. Much appreciated. You're quite welcome. Please let us know how it went. I will do it during weekend when no users are working. (this creates the saying about sysadmin: people work, we work. people rest, we still work). Indeed. In my specific case, I schedule myself for Saturday work for this purpose, and schedule a day off during the week to compensate. But I also know that my situation isn't representation of the general IT condition. Hope it goes well. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to make nodes in my local LAN see each other's names
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Timothy Madden terminato...@gmail.com Indeed, my router (D-Link DIR-100) only does DNS relay and nothing more. What about in Network Setting / DHCP Client list reservation? It lists Host Name entries... http://www.scribd.com/doc/10073475/DIR100-Manual-En Page 26 JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:44, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Normally I would have a VM for this sort of thing but I still do not have a machine available for that and I'm hesitant to put VMWare Server on one of my production machines. I'm new here and have already flagged that I need a box for VMs - hoping to have something in place by this time next week. I'd be hesitant to put an EOL product on my production machines as well. Look at xen, kvm, or virtualbox for your virt needs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
I'd be hesitant to put an EOL product on my production machines as well. Let me rephrase that - I am hesitant to put ANY virtualization on these production machines. Mainly because I am very new here and do not know the environment very well yet. -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] checking package versions in various releases
On 11/30/2011 10:15 AM, Alan McKay wrote: I'd be hesitant to put an EOL product on my production machines as well. Let me rephrase that - I am hesitant to put ANY virtualization on these production machines. Mainly because I am very new here and do not know the environment very well yet. The answer to your question is this: yum info will tell you 2 things. The installed version and the latest available version. The installed version(s) are all versions of that on your machine ... usually only kernel will have more than one. The available version is the latest in the repos that you have active. If you have your own repo then it would be the latest in your repo. If you use the default repos, then it would be the latest available for the entire 5.x tree (currently 5.7). You can also just look here to see the latest as well: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/ or if there are no updates for a package then here: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 81, Issue 14
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2011:1496 Important CentOS 4 i386 bind Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2011:1496 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 bind Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CEEA-2011:1500 CentOS 5 x86_64 ixgbe-kmod Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CEEA-2011:1500 CentOS 5 i386 ixgbe-kmod Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CESA-2011:1479 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update
(Johnny Hughes)
6. CESA-2011:1479 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
(Johnny Hughes)
7. CEBA-2011:1502 CentOS 5 i386 dump FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
8. CEBA-2011:1502 CentOS 5 x86_64 dump FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
9. CEBA-2011:1503 CentOS 5 i386 ecryptfs-utils FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
10. CEBA-2011:1503 CentOS 5 x86_64 ecryptfs-utils FASTTRACK
Update (Johnny Hughes)
11. CEBA-2011:1501 CentOS 5 i386 expect FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
12. CEBA-2011:1501 CentOS 5 x86_64 expect FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
13. CEBA-2011:1498 CentOS 5 i386 libusb FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
14. CEBA-2011:1498 CentOS 5 x86_64 libusb FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
15. CEBA-2011:1493 CentOS 5 i386 mrtg FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
16. CEBA-2011:1493 CentOS 5 x86_64 mrtg FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
17. CEBA-2011:1497 CentOS 5 i386 procps FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
18. CEBA-2011:1497 CentOS 5 x86_64 procps FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
19. CEBA-2011:1499 CentOS 5 i386 freeipmi FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
20. CEBA-2011:1499 CentOS 5 x86_64 freeipmi FASTTRACK Update
(Johnny Hughes)
21. CEBA-2011:1505 CentOS 5 x86_64 system-config-bind FASTTRACK
Update (Johnny Hughes)
22. CEBA-2011:1505 CentOS 5 i386 system-config-bind FASTTRACK
Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:31:45 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1496 Important CentOS 4 i386 bind
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 2029183145.ga2...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1496 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1496.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
6198ad54e5335b9da5a6936970f098f2 bind-9.2.4-38.el4.i386.rpm
c24193ba99cdcf24f83f946e6489af38 bind-chroot-9.2.4-38.el4.i386.rpm
aa3844b507936e27969beed26ce20d25 bind-devel-9.2.4-38.el4.i386.rpm
4349043bdfcc126dad40c77d65f7098b bind-libs-9.2.4-38.el4.i386.rpm
d123aab8e927a5e0cd7447104d1a156a bind-utils-9.2.4-38.el4.i386.rpm
Source:
4a0c1e15d50a3b175ff8e7a4de9162ec bind-9.2.4-38.el4.src.rpm
--
Tru Huynh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: tru_tru, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:31:45 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1496 Important CentOS 4 x86_64
bindUpdate
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 2029183145.ga2...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1496 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1496.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
115a0460f5625c5f6ffbf7b08ef58202 bind-9.2.4-38.el4.x86_64.rpm
6777aeb040f300843a566832e066c2cb bind-chroot-9.2.4-38.el4.x86_64.rpm
45f2f1f97ae1e46b2ce9b971c8e33126 bind-devel-9.2.4-38.el4.x86_64.rpm
4349043bdfcc126dad40c77d65f7098b bind-libs-9.2.4-38.el4.i386.rpm
bdff8d37f46e161cd33daea2c94166b9 bind-libs-9.2.4-38.el4.x86_64.rpm
e34cd4d28f1a54e021a21de30b5c2720 bind-utils-9.2.4-38.el4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
4a0c1e15d50a3b175ff8e7a4de9162ec bind-9.2.4-38.el4.src.rpm
--
Tru Huynh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: tru_tru, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:50:23 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:1500 CentOS 5 x86_64 ixgbe-kmod
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 2029185023.ga2...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS
Re: [CentOS] megaraid/PERC
Ross Walker wrote: On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror, I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer to the replacement, so I just shoved them into another Dell server, with a PERC 5 controller - I think that's what the dead one had. I fired up MegaRAID storage manager... but can't see any way to tell it to recreate that RAID. Anyone done this? Probably old news now, but in the PERC card's BIOS you want to import foreign config, save it and restart. Ok, no one else was using one of the two I have available (most are now surplussed, so there's only a few left in service) is not being used at the moment, so I rebooted, and went into the firmware. Foreign was greyed out, unreachable, no matter what I did. We're probably writing the drives off - there *shouldn't* be anything to be recovered on them, but I was just tryin' to be sure For my own amusement, I installed MegaCli 4, and am trying to puzzle my way through the lack of documentation, only the output of MegaCLI64 -? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On 11/30/2011 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: There's an article on slashdot about the Duqu team wiping all their intermediary cc servers on 20 Oct. Interestingly, the report says that they were all (?) not only linux, but CentOS. There's a suggestion of a zero-day exploit in openssh-4.3, but both the original article, and Kaspersky labs (who have a *very* interesting post of the story) consider that highly unlikely, and the evidence points to brute-force attacks against the root password. Then they update openssh and openssh-server. And then, at some point, they apparently take an ubuntu/debian openssh 5.9p1 (then p2) source package, and install *that* My manager suggest updating openssh to block other attackers (who actually might screw their attack). It still seems odd to me to yum update, then build the software from source. Are your root passwords strong? mark PS: Oh, yes: http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/11/30/1610228/duqu-attackers-managed-to-wipe-cc-servers The problem with that theory is that Red Hat has backported patches for all know exploits. I am going to specifically research which exploit they think is being used ... Now, note that people were running 5.2 or 5.3, etc and not 5.7 like they should have been, so there might well have been an openssh exploit available ... just not a zero day one from 4.3. I am very interested and will be researching this thoroughly. My initial gut reaction is that they got in via a password though. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Are your root passwords strong? I've always wondered why something as complex as sshd doesn't do anything to protect you from the simplest form of attack - like rate-limiting failed attempts. Well, it does take time to respond to failed passwords, in my experience. From the example in the Kaspersky Labs post, either they tried over a period of time (low-level persistent threat), or it was a stupidly weak password (or had never been changed). We also run fail2ban, that slows them down a *lot* more. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Are your root passwords strong? I've always wondered why something as complex as sshd doesn't do anything to protect you from the simplest form of attack - like rate-limiting failed attempts. Passwords?? Why? Remote root login via ssh?? Why? This is why they invented cyphers and rsa and 3des etc - use these and it makes it MUCH harder for the black hackers. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote: I've always wondered why something as complex as sshd doesn't do anything to protect you from the simplest form of attack - like rate-limiting failed attempts. Passwords?? Why? Because they are there and enabled by default... Remote root login via ssh?? Why? Because that is necessary (or a way to escalate to root) to do anything useful like backups or remote administration. This is why they invented cyphers and rsa and 3des etc - use these and it makes it MUCH harder for the black hackers. Sure, but you could just use a separate VPN to get in if you want to make things complicated. Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On 30 Nov 2011, at 18:51, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. I've always adopted the policy of disabling root logins, making admins use a separate account with public/private key authentication and then requiring them to use su to elevate privileges. Has the advantage that your logs will tell you who logged in and performed an action rather than the vague 'root'. Ben Sent from my iPhone ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On 11/30/2011 1:55 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: On 30 Nov 2011, at 18:51, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. I've always adopted the policy of disabling root logins, making admins use a separate account with public/private key authentication and then requiring them to use su to elevate privileges. Has the advantage that your logs will tell you who logged in and performed an action rather than the vague 'root'. Ben How would you automate daily logins from another server to do something like rsync the entire /etc directory to a backup system? -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:01 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: How would you automate daily logins from another server to do something like rsync the entire /etc directory to a backup system? Key restrictions in authorized_keys from=10.10.10.10 command=rsync -azv blah/blah/. ssh-key-info-here better than nothing. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:01 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote: On 11/30/2011 1:55 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. I've always adopted the policy of disabling root logins, making admins use a separate account with public/private key authentication and then requiring them to use su to elevate privileges. Has the advantage that your logs will tell you who logged in and performed an action rather than the vague 'root'. How would you automate daily logins from another server to do something like rsync the entire /etc directory to a backup system? You can set up a passwordless sudo that is passed as part of the ssh command. And I agree that this is likely to be a safer approach as long as the private key which is much like a written-down password can be protected well enough. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
On 30-11-11 20:01, John Hinton wrote: On 11/30/2011 1:55 PM, Benjamin Donnachie wrote: On 30 Nov 2011, at 18:51, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. I've always adopted the policy of disabling root logins, making admins use a separate account with public/private key authentication and then requiring them to use su to elevate privileges. Has the advantage that your logs will tell you who logged in and performed an action rather than the vague 'root'. Ben How would you automate daily logins from another server to do something like rsync the entire /etc directory to a backup system? Maybe the sshd_config option PermitRootLogin forced-commands-only could help? This allows root logins but limits which command(s) can be executed. There is a description of how this works here: http://troy.jdmz.net/rsync/index.html Regards, Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ipa-server
hi I am a happy user of CentOS since Centos 4. I very much appreciate the effort you guys are putting into Centos 6. I am planning to play around with the ipa-server in Centos 6.1. Now I noticed that ipa-server is in the cr-repository. In order to install however the pki-ca and pki-silent packages are missing. The fact that ipa-server is built suggests that these packages have been built. If so, tit may be an oversight that these packages have not yet been pushed to the repo. In that case it would be nice if they could be pushed. If they are not yet ready, I will happily wait for them...(I understand the complexity of the work involved!!!) Thanks for the great distro! Louis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] duqu
Benjamin Donnachie wrote: On 30 Nov 2011, at 18:51, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ssh is mostly about being able to log in. I've always adopted the policy of disabling root logins, making admins use a separate account with public/private key authentication and then requiring them to use su to elevate privileges. Has the advantage that your logs will tell you who logged in and performed an action rather than the vague 'root'. +1 Ben Sent from my iPhone ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] megaraid/PERC
On Nov 30, 2011, at 1:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Ross Walker wrote: On Nov 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've got two drives from a now-dead server, they were RAIDed, a mirror, I'd assume. I need to see if there's anything on them I need to transfer to the replacement, so I just shoved them into another Dell server, with a PERC 5 controller - I think that's what the dead one had. I fired up MegaRAID storage manager... but can't see any way to tell it to recreate that RAID. Anyone done this? Probably old news now, but in the PERC card's BIOS you want to import foreign config, save it and restart. Ok, no one else was using one of the two I have available (most are now surplussed, so there's only a few left in service) is not being used at the moment, so I rebooted, and went into the firmware. Foreign was greyed out, unreachable, no matter what I did. We're probably writing the drives off - there *shouldn't* be anything to be recovered on them, but I was just tryin' to be sure It may be the drives were software mirrored? Or maybe mirrored with a different controller like a PERC 'i' which works differently then the 'e' controllers. I have heard of people setting their PERCs in pass-through mode and doing software RAID, or setting the drives up as a bunch of single disk RAID0 drives and doing software RAID, so I wouldn't rule it out. See if there is a partition table on the disks or a whole disk LVM VG. For my own amusement, I installed MegaCli 4, and am trying to puzzle my way through the lack of documentation, only the output of MegaCLI64 -? The MegaCli is the most archaic utility. I have a storage server in one of my datacenters that has a PERC 6i and two PERC 6e controllers and I use a combination of MSM framework and MegaCli to manage it. I'll do an rpm dump when I get a chance and list the Dell/LSI packages installed. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
