[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 pidgin Update

2011-12-14 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1820 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
3674fc7a5e1f377a6d9c4cfb5d2dd6cbf9835a388d250e0b8f709229b3b65a57  
finch-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
137212f38c28475d2bef1e494b92482a17e52d61b8f81b657acc7c49c97a064f  
finch-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
01e0e301d3980c65c1964e43a91026e15080aa571cab05f7d9300764a11ed112  
libpurple-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
798e49aaf2b26bd5e449fe5a89c4cda5b7ca0a1ed7b3f1a76393a8385c646cac  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
660c71689333ec41338b79b8fd0fdcd34a0a2953f92537f4fedfe92508ab415c  
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
64c21ef224e0d1777bc05124b5407581cbae865c8b9542299fa5e7c7a8f15cb7  
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
3608029cca6e3546175e4642becacb3285ccf98803150faf72b5bab45a964130  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
72b812daf7bbca1d3601dba97f69efd7fb68ca90439a8fbe465a397c6c5ea6cb  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
54a829623329970130c6f5ace5dfd9f6920e65ae07c4b01490ef39acd14f4e33  
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm

Source:
490774f8a7a83d9c75c5ca24ca5d0518443fecc4d8347d073a7eb1a797620c36  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.src.rpm


-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 pidgin Update

2011-12-14 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1820 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
3674fc7a5e1f377a6d9c4cfb5d2dd6cbf9835a388d250e0b8f709229b3b65a57  
finch-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
1675eeb73c3afbf82c1bdd0e4b6e54f972baf98c1c0f19fa67c12af19347f957  
finch-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
137212f38c28475d2bef1e494b92482a17e52d61b8f81b657acc7c49c97a064f  
finch-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
b78204663c32a118553ddcc1bf36cca307b0e1e0ea5197af3821348efd91f1e4  
finch-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
01e0e301d3980c65c1964e43a91026e15080aa571cab05f7d9300764a11ed112  
libpurple-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
26305cab8f13626a1d5fc52a0cf78337a8da24aa49ca125bb095d27165d5d69e  
libpurple-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
798e49aaf2b26bd5e449fe5a89c4cda5b7ca0a1ed7b3f1a76393a8385c646cac  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
5d6ffb2246080f26a7997d073bacfcc5f2173f44d58dab49bf5abf5abc48f32f  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
7b4e813b7b8b3785214b1cf030b8a4a49444676700a2102364b00994fa864155  
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
d4028e9ad49cb86b60f40cbbe8189709b581bebb9ee4e45fba1ff38f11823460  
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
3608029cca6e3546175e4642becacb3285ccf98803150faf72b5bab45a964130  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
785322476c8d1aec41d8f3fe537ae365dbca1182a6083dd352c4087939a3491b  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
72b812daf7bbca1d3601dba97f69efd7fb68ca90439a8fbe465a397c6c5ea6cb  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
de4a9f21cb50fcf4205baae94143b586c40f83972dcd95ab7ae50b91215d1809  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
ea6f417605f82adda88bd6ab574a37077e198ac59445703da0a16aae26e9d03d  
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm

Source:
490774f8a7a83d9c75c5ca24ca5d0518443fecc4d8347d073a7eb1a797620c36  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.src.rpm


-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 pidgin Update

2011-12-14 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1820 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
f03da7acd81bdaf8f6f2516d6732e2a6496f716b7e6e7e015286c22021e43375  
finch-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
86c49c05cbe08703b6eecbc7091d80d3b7f930e797fe91ca0a21412e64f1de08  
finch-devel-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
b2ecdfa401eeffb2fbbd5a11aaaeed59edd980228db64d439b26172af02c6e39  
libpurple-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
7186871be4941d33c66b25617076082b6da647f876d8f9066dbb97c31c0f4b25  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
8ee99e3a08322373b94e6809527692aa1c25af4ef0171b9f20fc6a354cfe0b4b  
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
645d8f3331b44a5289303db2ebca03be2932f45fc550f80094f44bc01b18a2f8  
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
3f7ead4c9832ac474d32f1ebd1a874370473ca15858a4934f566ac7ced679099  
pidgin-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
3bdc07631ec9a24737ba600e41077630f1480242638849328474ce5c3b1b2c8e  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm
29e889dcb45abc66966b9b228b47fdeb3fceff2ea060a14f1ff42539bc300400  
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-10.el4.i386.rpm

Source:
8e4498f4403a1d3b917f0805a939f8bdc60717d6121b2ea82a2f3ae951951313  
pidgin-2.6.6-10.el4.src.rpm


-- 
Tru Huynh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: tru_tru, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 pidgin Update

2011-12-14 Thread Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1820 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
d364d676a61f331f8ed1c8ce0a9336e6a125a829817e9e1fdf87b40550ee4e1d  
finch-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
54523547c33c4df3f1895d660644070008a0ebb2c9a13f3d451c83a1a99a6a17  
finch-devel-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
79e091db48dd43466366b79ac66320b6d46c526ce4b8cb710a1d65dfb0e74e23  
libpurple-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
bb3640a1f28ed337d3b04d607dc22416948a2fe49bde5d9cda3c75a3f7084c4e  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
25c018ab2e31027e1f9581a2c0e3c90e2e7fbf887f795ca49453e51803a3a0ce  
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
49419eb61a45087945ad1d4f715f21e664856a9f8822eac12b3ec7faef05840a  
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
3dd9b5d240583aeac3137086526c7472346350c1db2d4f4a89486077dd2b0c7d  
pidgin-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
c729eaa037f5e3f1ead51a4ea66a8983a8b3e4cf981c357e1c3ddcb42e1d240e  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm
9cec76f4692c8e737208cb589013ecf1762a6160dc8bac77ffe26729c817f30c  
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-10.el4.x86_64.rpm

Source:
8e4498f4403a1d3b917f0805a939f8bdc60717d6121b2ea82a2f3ae951951313  
pidgin-2.6.6-10.el4.src.rpm


-- 
Tru Huynh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: tru_tru, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-es] Rendimiento: máquina de un raid 1 mediante software

2011-12-14 Thread Ricardo Martinez
Hola!!!

estoy con un CentOS 5 instalación nueva, está server no tiene controladora
raid física, he pensado en ponerlo por software, afecta mucho al
rendimiento ¿?

( Nunca he trababajado con Raids mediante por software, siempre han sido
físicos )

Saludos!!!
-- 
Ricardo
___
IT Architect
website: http://www.pulsarinara.com
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] freeradius

2011-12-14 Thread jorgito
hola alguien tiene algun tuto de este programa para saber si se puede anclar 
los telefonos
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Rendimiento: máquina de un raid 1 mediante software

2011-12-14 Thread Ernesto Pérez Estévez
On 12/14/2011 02:30 PM, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
 Hola!!!

 estoy con un CentOS 5 instalación nueva, está server no tiene controladora
 raid física, he pensado en ponerlo por software, afecta mucho al
 rendimiento ¿?
sí te va a afectar,s i tienes un servidor con mucho movimiento,
definitivamente te va a afectar, si es un server con bajísimo I/O
entonces no.

el raid por software requerirá de recursos del procesador para hacer su
labor, mientras el raid por hardware pasa todo eso transparentemente al
hardware, el cual viene con su propio procesador y memoria nvram a veces
para realizar él la labor.

tuvimos un server con raid por soft hace muchos años y a la final
casualmente terminé cambiándolo por un hardware idéntico (idéntico!)
pero con raid por hardware, la mejora fue evidentísima, pero te estoy
hablando de que tenía un I/O grandísimo.. si lo que vas a es a tener un
server con una BD que realizará una o dos consultas por minuto o que
manejará unas 100 o 200 cuentas de correo, entonces dale, usa el raid
por software.

saludos
epe

 ( Nunca he trababajado con Raids mediante por software, siempre han sido
 físicos )

 Saludos!!!


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] freeradius

2011-12-14 Thread Edg@r Rodolfo
2011/12/14, jorgito jorg...@ebise.cu:
 hola alguien tiene algun tuto de este programa para saber si se puede anclar
 los telefonos

Tuto?, por qué no lo instalas y pruebas y haces un tuto... si no sabes
usarlo lee la documentación de dichos proyectos, intentalo tú primero,
no esperes que los tutos te resuelvan todo lo que pides, saludos!
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es



-- 
Edguit@r
http://cybernautape.blogspot.com
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] CR repo - version issue

2011-12-14 Thread Philippe Naudin
Le mer 14 déc 2011 12:17:36 CET, Philip Manuel a écrit:

 
 
 On 12/14/2011 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
  On 12/13/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
 
  On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 
  You do have i686 packages on that machine ... that is what the error you
  posted is.
 
  create (or edit( a file called:
 
  /root/.rpmmacros
 
  put this in the that file as the top line:
 
  %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
 
  Then do the command:
 
  rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86
 
  That should show you the i686 packages that are installed on the machine.
 
 cat /etc/rpm/macros.zomojo
 # Zomojo global rpm macros
   %org_tag .zmj
   %dist .el6
   %rhel 6
   %zmj_bjam_flags '-j 4'
   %packager Zomojo bu...@zomojo.com
   %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
 rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86
 :~#
 
 Nothing other than x86_64 packages

Maybe also, in the case there is something broken in the yum database :
yum list installed '*i[3456]86'


-- 
Philippe Naudin
UMR MISTEA : Mathématiques, Informatique et STatistique pour 
l'Environnement et l'Agronomie
INRA, bâtiment 29   -   2 place Viala   -   34060 Montpellier cedex 2
tél: 04.99.61.26.34, fax: 04.99.61.29.03, mél: nau...@supagro.inra.fr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Yum metadata / CR problems

2011-12-14 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Hi,
after the release of 6.1 I have to do a yum clean all on all my 6.0 
machines in order to make yum work again. The reason is that the old CR 
directory on the mirrors is now empty and the new one isn't used until I 
actually upgrade the system to 6.1 (or at least the centos-release package).

Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?

I'm also not quite sure why the yum clean all is required. It has been a 
few days now since 6.1 has been released so shouldn't the cached metadata 
have been expired by now anyway or is there metadata that has unusually 
long caching times?

Regards,
   Dennis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Minimal Desktop in CentOS6 with kvm

2011-12-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/14/2011 03:02 AM, David McGuffey piše:
 Anyone able to do this?  Any tips on what might be missing in the load?

If nowone answers, there is centos-virt list better suited for this 
question.


-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Yum metadata / CR problems

2011-12-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
 Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?

I am sure there is, looking into that right now

 
 I'm also not quite sure why the yum clean all is required. 

you should not need to do an 'all' for anything really, 'yum clean
metadata' will do what you need here.

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Yum metadata / CR problems

2011-12-14 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
 Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?
 
 I am sure there is, looking into that right now

posted a potential fix into the metadata, that should peculate through
to mirrors soon and fix the issue for everyone.

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

2011-12-14 Thread m . roth
Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the
preferred tool for updates was the new yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a)
what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's
the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron?

I hand-update some servers, and of course users' workstations, but some
system, like home directory servers and backup servers are extremely
unlikely to break with an autoupdate, so this is of immediate interest.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Apache httpd-2.2.15 updates

2011-12-14 Thread drsystems
Hello,

I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.

I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21
applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9?

There was a security fix just last August, the CVE-2011-3192 on Range and
DoS. I don't imagine that this is in the 2.2.15-9. Do you have plans to
provide this patch in the repository so that 'yum update httpd*' would get
this patch?

Thank you in advance,

  Dirce Richards
  Systems Engineer, GlobalCerts




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache httpd-2.2.15 updates

2011-12-14 Thread Lars Hecking
drsyst...@globalcerts.net writes:
 Hello,
 
 I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
 I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
 After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.
 
 I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
 information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21
 applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9?
 
 There was a security fix just last August, the CVE-2011-3192 on Range and
 DoS. I don't imagine that this is in the 2.2.15-9. Do you have plans to
 provide this patch in the repository so that 'yum update httpd*' would get
 this patch?

$ cd $REPO
$ rpm -qp --changelog httpd-2.2.15-9.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
* Fri Oct 21 2011 Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org - 2.2.15-9.3.el6.centos
- Roll in CentOS Branding

* Thu Oct 06 2011 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9.3
- add security fixes for CVE-2011-3347, CVE-2011-3368 (#743901)
- fix regressions in CVE-2011-3192 patch (#736592)

* Tue Aug 30 2011 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9.2,
- updated patch for CVE-2011-3192 from upstream (#733062)

* Fri Aug 26 2011 Jan Kaluza jkal...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9.1
- fix #733062 -  backported CVE-2011-3192 fix from httpd trunk

* Fri Apr 08 2011 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9
- mod_ssl: complete fix for overlapping memcpy (#652335)
...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] UUID for network cards

2011-12-14 Thread Helmut Drodofsky
Hello,

with CentOS 6, my new server created an UUID entry in ifcfg-eth0 - 
additional to HWADDR entry.

Up to CentOS 5 the connection to the netwark card was defind only by HWADDR.

Now I have a new network card. How can I get the correct UUID?

The server connects correct the network with the updated HWADDR without 
any UUID. Why do I need an UUID?

Thank you for help in advance.

Best Regards
Helmut Drodofsky



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] dd disk will not boot - can't find /dev/root

2011-12-14 Thread Joseph Spenner




Am 12.12.2011 17:01, schrieb Joseph Spenner:
 
 
  From: Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com
 To: centos@centos.org centos@centos.org 
 Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 8:51 AM
 Subject: [CentOS] dd disk will not boot - can't find /dev/root
  
 OS= CentOS 5.4, 64bit.
 
 I've always had great luck using dd to copy entire disks, and booting on 
 other systems.  However, I'm having difficulty with a couple systems.  I boot 
 using an install DVD so the OS disk is quiet, and dd to my target disk:
 
 # dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=1024k
 
 /dev/sdb is the blank disk.  The disks are 2T.  After a few hours the 
 operation is complete.  But when I try to boot the new disk on my other 
 system, I get the following errors after the CentOS boot menu (it counts down 
 to boot the default disk fine, then this error):
 
   (screen shot at   
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/645/centosbooterror.jpg   )
 
 I've read posts regarding the /dev/root error, and they talk about rebuilding 
 initrd.  I've tried some of the fixes mentioned, but have had no success.
 All I can think of is slightly different hardware on the new system where I'm 
 trying to boot, but I'm not sure what the difference could be.
 They're both 64bit SuperMicro systems.
 
 If anyone has any ideas, I'd love to hear.

boot from the rescue-cd and reinstall the kernel of the cloned system
or make a new initramdisk per hand - i guess the kernel is missing some
needed hardware-driver of the new computer in the initrd

=
Thanks for the replies!
I booted the rescue-cd and reinstalled initrd from RPM.  That seemed to fix it.

It amazes me how complex the whole boot process needs to be.  Or why there 
doesn't exist a simple bootable CD to fix an incorrect or destroyed MBR /boot 
partition, based on what it can analyze and figure out.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] dd disk will not boot - can't find /dev/root

2011-12-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I booted the rescue-cd and reinstalled initrd from RPM.  That seemed to fix 
 it.

 It amazes me how complex the whole boot process needs to be.  Or why there 
 doesn't exist a simple bootable CD to fix an incorrect or destroyed MBR /boot 
 partition, based on what it can analyze and figure out.


Agreed - It has to be fairly common to want to move an existing system
to newer hardware - or to restore a backup of a broken system onto a
not-quite identical replacement.  Anaconda is the only thing that
knows how to configure new hardware for booting - and it isn't
telling...  The only way to get it to help out is to do an install on
the target hardware and either keep the resulting /boot partition and
/etc/modprobe.conf, overwriting everything else with your backup, or
use the info from modprobe.conf to build an initrd containing the
right modules before making your backup (assuming the old system still
works).   The difficulty in handling this operation is a lot of reason
for the popularity of virtual machines in spite of the overhead.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Shutdown KVM guest not working

2011-12-14 Thread James B. Byrne
I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation.  At
the moment I am unable to shutdown a KVM guest machine. 
Nor am I presently able to open a virt-manager session on
the host.

I am not exactly sure what has happened but the problem
with the vm guest is that issuing a virsh shutdown 1
from the root console has no effect.

# virsh list
 Id Name  State

  1 vmguest01 running

# virsh shutdown 1
Doamin 1 is being shutdown

wait 5 minutes

# virsh list
 Id Name  State

  1 vmguest01 running

How do I get this stopped?

I have another problem with virt-manager as well.  But I
will leave that for another message.

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

2011-12-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
 Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6, the
 preferred tool for updates was the new yum-updatesd. Anyone know: a)
 what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b) what's
 the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron?

 I hand-update some servers, and of course users' workstations, but some
 system, like home directory servers and backup servers are extremely
 unlikely to break with an autoupdate, so this is of immediate interest.

 mark

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



There is the whole thread on the RepoForge mailing list with so caled 
solutions:

http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2011-December/022592.html

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Shutdown KVM guest not working

2011-12-14 Thread Marius Vaitiekunas
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:47 PM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
 I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation.  At
 the moment I am unable to shutdown a KVM guest machine.
 Nor am I presently able to open a virt-manager session on
 the host.

 I am not exactly sure what has happened but the problem
 with the vm guest is that issuing a virsh shutdown 1
 from the root console has no effect.

 # virsh list
  Id Name                          State
 
  1 vmguest01                 running

 # virsh shutdown 1
 Doamin 1 is being shutdown

 wait 5 minutes

 # virsh list
  Id Name                          State
 
  1 vmguest01                 running

 How do I get this stopped?

 I have another problem with virt-manager as well.  But I
 will leave that for another message.

 --
 ***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
 James B. Byrne                mailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
 Harte  Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
 9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
 Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
 Canada  L8E 3C3

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Make sure you have acpid service running in vm.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

2011-12-14 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
 Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6,
 the preferred tool for updates was the new yum-updatesd. Anyone know:
 a) what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b)
 what's the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron?

 I hand-update some servers, and of course users' workstations, but some
 system, like home directory servers and backup servers are extremely
 unlikely to break with an autoupdate, so this is of immediate interest.

 There is the whole thread on the RepoForge mailing list with so caled
 solutions:

 http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2011-December/022592.html

Oy, as they say, vey.

And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
.5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to install and configure; I
had to tune the free Oracle version to use almost all available memory (it
had a max of 1G for the free version), and on, and on.

Sounds as though I might want to roll out something like
5 1 * * * yum -y update

mark


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 82, Issue 9

2011-12-14 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2011:1815 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 icu Update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2011:1815 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 icu Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:14:20 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1815 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 icu
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111214001420.ga26...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1815 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1815.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
ff8072bc90d53597468560bbb41dbae288239fbc060f26c3cf4cbb7082f25f86  
icu-3.6-5.16.1.x86_64.rpm
57781db5aec39afa972767c509f70f04afa0a2ea494b9de0aafa7ea14c12eeff  
libicu-3.6-5.16.1.i386.rpm
e7d547534074e9778fec100ba38750fd685072a6eee3d5105b8befa05aa57e25  
libicu-3.6-5.16.1.x86_64.rpm
bebde578a020d6a9c629dd6e03fabf0c4837f94b8485dc7b5d55ba2430d3d92d  
libicu-devel-3.6-5.16.1.i386.rpm
f6db0f10c64902d4027e29337b99117ecedf9c7c74808c421eb5d931846e5b97  
libicu-devel-3.6-5.16.1.x86_64.rpm
a32f875843b044ee724e688ae89fadb26bea7aecd6fc11a9ace2d42bc03a238c  
libicu-doc-3.6-5.16.1.x86_64.rpm

Source:
a42b1ee152c2a66f70e2853a6d6093cc067d4931ae2d56debe4b4d87f6cfcae7  
icu-3.6-5.16.1.src.rpm


-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:14:20 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1815 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 icu
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111214001420.ga26...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1815 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1815.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
fffc15be14232d26eb697c2dbe39946821a431943959f719b30788ae16c9a2c8  
icu-3.6-5.16.1.i386.rpm
57781db5aec39afa972767c509f70f04afa0a2ea494b9de0aafa7ea14c12eeff  
libicu-3.6-5.16.1.i386.rpm
bebde578a020d6a9c629dd6e03fabf0c4837f94b8485dc7b5d55ba2430d3d92d  
libicu-devel-3.6-5.16.1.i386.rpm
dec7eaa9d6dcf2bd776d4d9a8b90269fb7b6301a30dbfcf8d7706b36ef0b8b14  
libicu-doc-3.6-5.16.1.i386.rpm

Source:
a42b1ee152c2a66f70e2853a6d6093cc067d4931ae2d56debe4b4d87f6cfcae7  
icu-3.6-5.16.1.src.rpm


-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 82, Issue 9
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Shutdown KVM guest not working

2011-12-14 Thread Rilindo Foster
You can run this:

Destroy vmname

This is an equivalent to powering off the server.

Obviously, this may cause some issues with vm when you start it up again. . .

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:47 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:

 I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation.  At
 the moment I am unable to shutdown a KVM guest machine. 
 Nor am I presently able to open a virt-manager session on
 the host.
 
 I am not exactly sure what has happened but the problem
 with the vm guest is that issuing a virsh shutdown 1
 from the root console has no effect.
 
 # virsh list
 Id Name  State
 
  1 vmguest01 running
 
 # virsh shutdown 1
 Doamin 1 is being shutdown
 
 wait 5 minutes
 
 # virsh list
 Id Name  State
 
  1 vmguest01 running
 
 How do I get this stopped?
 
 I have another problem with virt-manager as well.  But I
 will leave that for another message.
 
 -- 
 ***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
 James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
 Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
 9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
 Canada  L8E 3C3
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Shutdown KVM guest not working

2011-12-14 Thread James B. Byrne

On Wed, December 14, 2011 11:53, Marius Vaitiekunas wrote:



 Make sure you have acpid service running in vm.



[root@vhost01 ~]# service acpid status
acpid (pid 1741) is running...

-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte  Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] max user processes - is /etc/security/limits.conf the best place to change?

2011-12-14 Thread Alexander Farber
Hello centos-users,

in CentOS 6.1 is /etc/security/limits.conf
the best place to change the number of
max user processes for a daemon process?

(I'm asking because the .../security/... part
of the path sounds a bit strange)

Thank you
Alex
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] max user processes - is /etc/security/limits.conf the best place to change?

2011-12-14 Thread Marc Deop
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 18:41:13 Alexander Farber wrote:
 in CentOS 6.1 is /etc/security/limits.conf
 the best place to change the number of
 max user processes for a daemon process?
 
 (I'm asking because the .../security/... part
 of the path sounds a bit strange)

What's wrong with that? that avoids uncontrolled fork processes for example ;)

Regards
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

2011-12-14 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/14/2011 05:58 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Vreme: 12/14/2011 04:07 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us piše:
 Back in the Fedora docs I found on a google, it mentions that in FC6,
 the preferred tool for updates was the new yum-updatesd. Anyone know:
 a) what theological reason upstream had to drop it altogether, and b)
 what's the recommended replacement - is it yum-cron?

 I hand-update some servers, and of course users' workstations, but some
 system, like home directory servers and backup servers are extremely
 unlikely to break with an autoupdate, so this is of immediate interest.

 There is the whole thread on the RepoForge mailing list with so caled
 solutions:

 http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2011-December/022592.html

 Oy, as they say, vey.

 And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
 went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
 .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to install and configure; I
 had to tune the free Oracle version to use almost all available memory (it
 had a max of 1G for the free version), and on, and on.

 Sounds as though I might want to roll out something like
 5 1 * * * yum -y update

  mark

Someone offered to recompiled it. I would if I had time. Maybe if 
nothing shows up in next few weeks..

But then again those needing automatic updates like to keep their 
systems third-party free...

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

2011-12-14 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
 went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
 .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to install and configure; I
 had to tune the free Oracle version to use almost all available memory (it
 had a max of 1G for the free version), and on, and on.

It wasn't *that* bad...  It is however overkill for a lot of situations.

 Sounds as though I might want to roll out something like
 5 1 * * * yum -y update

Probably want something that spots a hung yum and kills it, as it /can/ get
itself into a pickle and not complete.

jh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Network Situation

2011-12-14 Thread Gene Poole
In my personal environment, I've got 7 machines running, with 4 of those 
machines running various flavors of Linux (CentOS 5 x86_64; Fedora 15 
x86_64; Fedora 14 i686).  Based upon some issues with the Fedora 15 x86_64 
machine I'm considering dropping Fedora 15 in favor of CentOS 6.1.  My 
questions are:
On the networking side, has a there been a move to change the ethernet 
names from eth0 to em1?
After install, can I change from NetworkManager to plain network?
On my CentOS 5 machine I'm running VMware Server 2 and would like to move 
to KVM virtualization on the Fedora 15/CentOS 6.1 box.  Is the level of 
KVM comparable between Fedora 15 and CentOS 6?
If I install CentOS 6.0 and sometime later upgrade to CentOS 6.2, will the 
fact that I'm running software raid-1 on the /boot partition cause me 
grief?
Will the fact that I'm running software raid-1 and LVM that was defined 
under Fedora 12 cause me grief?
Are there any caveats moving from Fedora 15 to CentOS 6?

Any advise?

Thanks,
Gene Poole

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Network Situation

2011-12-14 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf Of Gene Poole
 Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 13:08
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: [CentOS] Network Situation
 
SNIP
 If I install CentOS 6.0 and sometime later upgrade to CentOS 6.2, will
 the fact that I'm running software raid-1 on the /boot partition 
 cause me grief?
SNIP

6.2 is the kind of release that those in the community and TUV call a
'point release'.
Reading the FAQ may help you.
14. What is the versioning/release scheme of CentOS and how does it
compare to the upstream vendor?
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-6e2c3746ec45ac3142917466760321e8
68f43c0e

And I think the backport link to redhat in the following FAQ could be
useful for you to understand.
20. Where can I get the latest version of XyZ.rpm for CentOS? I cannot
find it anywhere.
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-472ce8446ebcfc82ca1800f775ba0e62
9ac835c7

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache httpd-2.2.15 updates

2011-12-14 Thread drsystems
Thank you.
 drsyst...@globalcerts.net writes:
 Hello,

 I am working on a CentOS Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 system.
 I noticed that the system came with httpd-2.2.15-6 installed.
 After I run 'yum update' I get httpd-2.2.15-9.

 I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
 information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21
 applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9?

 There was a security fix just last August, the CVE-2011-3192 on Range
 and
 DoS. I don't imagine that this is in the 2.2.15-9. Do you have plans to
 provide this patch in the repository so that 'yum update httpd*' would
 get
 this patch?

 $ cd $REPO
 $ rpm -qp --changelog httpd-2.2.15-9.el6.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
 * Fri Oct 21 2011 Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org -
 2.2.15-9.3.el6.centos
 - Roll in CentOS Branding

 * Thu Oct 06 2011 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9.3
 - add security fixes for CVE-2011-3347, CVE-2011-3368 (#743901)
 - fix regressions in CVE-2011-3192 patch (#736592)

 * Tue Aug 30 2011 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9.2,
 - updated patch for CVE-2011-3192 from upstream (#733062)

 * Fri Aug 26 2011 Jan Kaluza jkal...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9.1
 - fix #733062 -  backported CVE-2011-3192 fix from httpd trunk

 * Fri Apr 08 2011 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com - 2.2.15-9
 - mod_ssl: complete fix for overlapping memcpy (#652335)
 ...

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7 (Final)

2011-12-14 Thread Ron Young
@Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file
located on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party
application that is central to the business.

Does anyone have experience doing so?

I have used odbtp in the recent past but it is extremely difficult to
set up on the linux box as I learned when I recently upgraded from
CentOS 4.x to 5.x.

Is there another way to get read and write access to the mdb file from
apache/php running from the linux box?  A couple of hours of googling
last night has resulted in finding very expensive odbc drivers for the
linux box and nothing really foss except the odbc driver managers.


Regards,

Ron Young
919-621-9015
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronhyoung

+++
Little tiny dreams require little tiny thoughts and little tiny steps.
Great big dreams require great big thoughts and little tiny steps.
+++
Kosh: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CR repo - version issue

2011-12-14 Thread Philip Manuel


On 12/14/2011 07:26 PM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
 Le mer 14 déc 2011 12:17:36 CET, Philip Manuel a écrit:


 You do have i686 packages on that machine ... that is what the error you
 posted is.

 create (or edit( a file called:

 /root/.rpmmacros

 put this in the that file as the top line:

 %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}

 Then do the command:

 rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86

 That should show you the i686 packages that are installed on the machine.

%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
 rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86
 :~#

 Nothing other than x86_64 packages
 Maybe also, in the case there is something broken in the yum database :
 yum list installed '*i[3456]86'

yum list installed '*i[3456]86'
base
 
| 1.2 kB 00:00
cr  
 
| 1.9 kB 00:00
dag 
 
| 1.9 kB 00:00
local   
 
| 2.6 kB 00:00
of  
 
|  951 B 00:00
updates 
 
| 1.1 kB 00:00
Error: No matching Packages to list

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7 (Final)

2011-12-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Ron Young ronyo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
 @Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file
 located on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party
 application that is central to the business.

 Does anyone have experience doing so?

 I have used odbtp in the recent past but it is extremely difficult to
 set up on the linux box as I learned when I recently upgraded from
 CentOS 4.x to 5.x.

 Is there another way to get read and write access to the mdb file from
 apache/php running from the linux box?  A couple of hours of googling
 last night has resulted in finding very expensive odbc drivers for the
 linux box and nothing really foss except the odbc driver managers.


The best approach to doing this is to convert the access tables to use
a sql server instead of the native mdb.   This may or may not be
practical/easy, but access can work over ODBC with the db on
linux/postgresql (among others) where you would have a matching php
client.Next best would be to write something to give web server
access to the data you need on the windows box, and access it remote
via http.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[CentOS] Missing nss dependency nss-softokn

2011-12-14 Thread Cal Webster
I'm getting yum update errors when attempting to update nss:

-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.9
Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
(@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0)
   nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.7-1.1.el6

I realize I need to swap in the 6.1 ISO on our internal mirror but the
missing package doesn't appear to be on the mirrors either.

I can't see nss-softokn-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64.rpm anywhere on the
mirrors. I checked the updates and cr repos on the Duke mirror for 6.0
and 6.1 but no joy.

Did this one fall through the cracks or are the mirrors still syncing
up?

I'm happy to wait if it's just a timing issue but I wanted to be sure
the list knew, just in case.

./Cal

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6, yum-updatesd

2011-12-14 Thread Corey Henderson
On 12/14/2011 10:55 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
 On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 And I worked on Spacewalk in early '09. AAAGHGHGHGHHGHG It
 went from .3 to .4 while I was trying to implement it, and I think it hit
 .5 as I left that contract. It was a nightmare to install and configure; I
 had to tune the free Oracle version to use almost all available memory (it
 had a max of 1G for the free version), and on, and on.

 It wasn't *that* bad...  It is however overkill for a lot of situations.

 Sounds as though I might want to roll out something like
 5 1 * * * yum -y update

 Probably want something that spots a hung yum and kills it, as it /can/ get
 itself into a pickle and not complete.

 jh

I've used the scripts at this URL with satisfying results:

http://wiki.centos.org/YumCheckOrInstallUpdates

-- 
Corey Henderson
http://cormander.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7 (Final)

2011-12-14 Thread Smithies, Russell
Try the Sybase driver.
I can connect Perl to Microsoft SQL Server using Sybase drivers it so might 
work with Access.
Parts of this might be useful: http://www.peceny.de/misc/freetds.html

--Russell

 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf Of Les Mikesell
 Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2011 10:58 a.m.
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7
 (Final)
 
 On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Ron Young ronyo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
  @Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file
  located on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party
  application that is central to the business.
 
  Does anyone have experience doing so?
 
  I have used odbtp in the recent past but it is extremely difficult to
  set up on the linux box as I learned when I recently upgraded from
  CentOS 4.x to 5.x.
 
  Is there another way to get read and write access to the mdb file from
  apache/php running from the linux box?  A couple of hours of googling
  last night has resulted in finding very expensive odbc drivers for the
  linux box and nothing really foss except the odbc driver managers.
 
 
 The best approach to doing this is to convert the access tables to use
 a sql server instead of the native mdb.   This may or may not be
 practical/easy, but access can work over ODBC with the db on
 linux/postgresql (among others) where you would have a matching php
 client.Next best would be to write something to give web server
 access to the data you need on the windows box, and access it remote via
 http.
 
 --
   Les Mikesell
  lesmikes...@gmail.com
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
===
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
===
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7 (Final)

2011-12-14 Thread John R Pierce
On 12/14/11 6:05 PM, Smithies, Russell wrote:
 I can connect Perl to Microsoft SQL Server using Sybase drivers it so might 
 work with Access.
 Parts of this might be useful:http://www.peceny.de/misc/freetds.html

Access native databases use the 'Jet' database engine, and they are 
files accessed over SMB/CIFS, not proper client-server like a 'real' 
database engine.

This is going to be painful no matter how you do it.

-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Cause for kernel panic

2011-12-14 Thread Nicolas Ross
Hi ! On an 8-node cluster, one of the node did a kernel panic.

The only bit of information I have is on a ssh console I had open, which 
said :


Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:[ cut here ]

Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP

Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:last sysfs file: 
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cache/index2/shared_cpu_map

Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Stack:

Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Call Trace:

Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Code: 01 00 00 e8 26 8a cd e0 85 c0 0f 85 0e ff ff ff 48 89 df 
e8 76 f8 ff ff e9 01 ff ff ff 31 d2 eb d4 48 89 de 31 ff e8 c3 e3 ff ff 
0f 0b eb fe 66 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48

Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception


 From this, is there a way to determine the cause ? kdump is not 
confirgured nor used, since the fencing of the node renders kdump useless.

This is the second time in a few weeks it happens.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cause for kernel panic

2011-12-14 Thread Corey Henderson
On 12/14/2011 8:49 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
   From this, is there a way to determine the cause ? kdump is not
 confirgured nor used, since the fencing of the node renders kdump useless.

 This is the second time in a few weeks it happens.

/var/log/messages should have more information; could you include it?

-- 
Corey Henderson
http://cormander.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cause for kernel panic

2011-12-14 Thread Ross Walker
On Dec 14, 2011, at 10:49 PM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:

 Hi ! On an 8-node cluster, one of the node did a kernel panic.
 
 The only bit of information I have is on a ssh console I had open, which 
 said :
 
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:[ cut here ]
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:last sysfs file: 
 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cache/index2/shared_cpu_map
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Stack:
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Call Trace:
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Code: 01 00 00 e8 26 8a cd e0 85 c0 0f 85 0e ff ff ff 48 89 df 
 e8 76 f8 ff ff e9 01 ff ff ff 31 d2 eb d4 48 89 de 31 ff e8 c3 e3 ff ff 
 0f 0b eb fe 66 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48
 
 Message from syslogd@node108 at Dec 14 19:00:15 ...
  kernel:Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
 
 
 From this, is there a way to determine the cause ? kdump is not 
 confirgured nor used, since the fencing of the node renders kdump useless.
 
 This is the second time in a few weeks it happens.

Setup netconsole to log kernel messages to the node on the left. Then you can 
get the the oops messages if any node crashes.

-Ross

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7 (Final)

2011-12-14 Thread Luigi Rosa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ron Young said the following on 14/12/11 22:21:
 @Work requires me to manipulate the MS Access database (mdb) file located
 on an XP box that is an integral part of a third party application that is
 central to the business.
 
 Does anyone have experience doing so?

I had to import some customer's data from an Access application for a new
(PHP) version of that application I wrote.

I used mdbtools http://mdbtools.sourceforge.net/

I scripted the conversion this way:

mdb-export -I -S -X -DF accessfile.mdb accesstablename  | sed
's/accesstablename/sqltablename/g' | sed 's/$/;/g'  /tmp/aaa
cat header.sql /tmp/aaa  import.sql
mysql --user=user --password=password  import.sql



header.sql file contains just this line:

use database;





Ciao,
luigi

- -- 
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\

It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most
intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
--Charles Darwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7pe24ACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZRCswCgxwgjhEYh8mzVwpXMxjS2g3QF
8yUAoI1BDogfHFCfrMPNzzK+Pe/faQxC
=rC14
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Using an MS Access database from CentOS release 5.7 (Final)

2011-12-14 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 12/15/2011 05:45 AM, Luigi Rosa wrote:
 I used mdbtools http://mdbtools.sourceforge.net/

This is also found in the epel repository.

Mogens

-- 
Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk
http://www.lemo.dk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos