[CentOS-docs] 6.1 Release Notes translations

2011-12-15 Thread Christoph Galuschka
  Hello,

  I have completed the german translation of the C6.1 release notes and
  would like to put them up at the wiki. I've also created a user account
  in the wiki but do not (yet) have write access. Could somebody please help.
  For now I've got the translation as an odf-file (allready mailed to
  Ralph as advised by KB).

  Thanks and cheers
  Christoph

Ralph: Thanks for putting the german notes up. If possible could you please 
grant my user write access to
that page to remedy some errors in the translation?

Thanks and cheers
Christoph

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] Missing nss dependency nss-softokn

2011-12-15 Thread John Doe
From: Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com

 Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
         Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.9
         Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
 (@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0)
            nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.7-1.1.el6
 I realize I need to swap in the 6.1 ISO on our internal mirror but the
 missing package doesn't appear to be on the mirrors either.

It is in /os:

.../6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-softokn-3.12.9-3.el6.i686.rpm
.../6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-softokn-3.12.9-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-15 Thread Rudi Ahlers
Hi,

2 websites, hosted on 2 different CentOS 5.7 servers (one being very
new, about 3 weeks old) keeps loosing data - but it's more like it's
corrupted than being deleted.

For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is
on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still
worked fine. The photo is 482Kb in size.

The first time this happened we thought it was due to a bug with
CentOS 5.7 + EXT4 + quotas (there's a bug open for this) and since the
server's console kept giving errors about possible data corruption we
thought it would be best if we move everything to a more stable
platform. So we brought a new server, setup CentOS 5.7 + ext3 + quotas
(which has been working fine on all our servers for a long time) and
moved the data across. A few days down the line and I still see this
happening.

I'm out of ideas and hope someone could shed some light on the matter.
I've checked some suggested search results, but couldn't find any
issues with the HDD according to SMART. The servers' both have 4GB RAM
and 8Core CPU's.Neither RAM, nor CPU usage is high. Both are setup
with RAID10 across 4 entrerprise HDD's, one server has software RAID
and the new one hardware RAID. So even when we changed the RAID
subsystem it still happens.



-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-15 Thread John Doe
From: Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com

 For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
 checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is
 on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still
 worked fine. The photo is 482Kb in size.

Only the size changed to 0 or were some other stats changed too?
Maybe try something like:
  inotifywait -m --format %T %e %f --timefmt %D %T -r /path/to/dir
At least you would know at what time something happens...

JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
 To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
 for priority settings?  It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-)   Thanks
 
 It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base 
 packages. This should only be used by hand per package basis.
 
 I have created local repository where I copy packages I wish to replace 
 and only that third-party repository has same priority as official 
 repositories.
 
 RPMForge (now RepoForge) has non-violent, or safe repository that 
 *should not* contain packages that overwrite base packages, and 
 violent repository named extras that is meant to overwrite base 
 packages.
 
Thanks.  I think that makes it clear - it seems that if I see this sort
of problem again I have to look at repositories that are not normally
enabled, and consider whether to temporarily enable them.  Is it safe to
leave rpmfusion-free-updates.repo and rpmfusion-nonree-updates.repo
without a specific priority setting?  The various testing repos are not
enabled.

Anne
-- 
Need KDE help?  Try
http://userbase.kde.org or
Http://forum.kde.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-15 Thread anax
Hi Rudi
we once had a similar problem on a Web:

This Web had this in particular that its home-page needed to be deleted 
daily and of course reinstalled immediately.
Then, in a new version of the Web it did not need this delete/reinstall 
cycle any more, so the webadmin just removed the link to the delete 
script. He did not remove the delete-script itself from the Web.
The effect was, that the home-page was still deleted at random times.

What we then found out: We used an internal Search-Engine which crawled 
this web. And this Search-Engine had not forgotten the link to the 
delete-script, but invoked it at random times, whenever it crawled  the 
particular Web.

Your case: could it be something similar?

suomi

On 2011-12-15 11:28, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
 Hi,

 2 websites, hosted on 2 different CentOS 5.7 servers (one being very
 new, about 3 weeks old) keeps loosing data - but it's more like it's
 corrupted than being deleted.

 For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
 checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is
 on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still
 worked fine. The photo is 482Kb in size.

 The first time this happened we thought it was due to a bug with
 CentOS 5.7 + EXT4 + quotas (there's a bug open for this) and since the
 server's console kept giving errors about possible data corruption we
 thought it would be best if we move everything to a more stable
 platform. So we brought a new server, setup CentOS 5.7 + ext3 + quotas
 (which has been working fine on all our servers for a long time) and
 moved the data across. A few days down the line and I still see this
 happening.

 I'm out of ideas and hope someone could shed some light on the matter.
 I've checked some suggested search results, but couldn't find any
 issues with the HDD according to SMART. The servers' both have 4GB RAM
 and 8Core CPU's.Neither RAM, nor CPU usage is high. Both are setup
 with RAID10 across 4 entrerprise HDD's, one server has software RAID
 and the new one hardware RAID. So even when we changed the RAID
 subsystem it still happens.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] When will 6.2 be released.

2011-12-15 Thread Mark Weaver
On 12/10/2011 4:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
 On 10 December 2011 10:41, Hakan Koseogluha...@koseoglu.org  wrote:
 On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
 I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
 Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!

 Damn, and I haven't even installed 6.0 yet ... slow down !! slow down
 !! aee !!

yup... 5.7 rolling along just fine on my servers... what's the rush?

-- 
Mark

If necessity is the mother of invention, then who's the father?
---
Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R)
Linux User Since 1996
Powered by RHEL 4
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] When will 6.2 be released.

2011-12-15 Thread Mark Weaver
On 12/10/2011 6:53 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
 On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:01 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.

 The CentOS team sucks ... it took  days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
 take twice as long to get 6.2

 My mom said CentOS blows.

 kbsingh is ugly.

 hughesjr is old and fat.

 OK ... that should do.

 come on Johnny, there are still plenty of people that appreciate the
 work you guys do and are happy to see 6.1 released. Please give us first
 a chance to say thank you so much!

 I understand that it is frustrating to release CentOS 6.1 right after
 RedHat release 6.2 so you can't even allow yourself to relax a bit (and
 knowing you guys you HAVE to keep up, not because of the complainer, but
 because of your pride in what you are doing and its results).

 Thanks for the work on 6.1!

 Louis

not to mention the holidays... give yourselves a break and have some 
fun. We'll all still be here come spring! :)

-- 
Mark

If necessity is the mother of invention, then who's the father?
---
Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R)
Linux User Since 1996
Powered by RHEL 4
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Yum metadata / CR problems

2011-12-15 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 12/14/2011 01:44 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
 Isn't there a better way to handle this without breaking yum?

 I am sure there is, looking into that right now

 posted a potential fix into the metadata, that should peculate through
 to mirrors soon and fix the issue for everyone.


Great, thanks! Can you elaborate what the fix changes? This accute problem 
is no biggie as it has a simple manual solution but if it would be 
necessary to do this on every distro update that wouldn't be ideal.

Regards,
   Dennis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] UUID for network cards

2011-12-15 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 12/14/2011 04:47 PM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
 Hello,

 with CentOS 6, my new server created an UUID entry in ifcfg-eth0 -
 additional to HWADDR entry.

 Up to CentOS 5 the connection to the netwark card was defind only by HWADDR.

 Now I have a new network card. How can I get the correct UUID?

 The server connects correct the network with the updated HWADDR without
 any UUID. Why do I need an UUID?

 Thank you for help in advance.

I'm only speculating here since I did notice the new UUIDs but haven't had 
to deal with them so far but my guess is that they provide a way for the to 
uniquely identify the logical interface and have nothing to do with the 
phyiscal interface itself. For example if you configure bridging you need 
to tell the interface the bridge they belong to. If you use the name br0 
for example and later decide to rename it to bridge0 then you also have 
to fix all references. If instead you reference the UUID then that is not 
necessary and you can rename them as you please without breaking any 
references.

Again this is speculation on my part based on how/why the UUIDs for disks 
where introduced.

Regards,
   Dennis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Unplugging DVI causes Disabling IRQ #11

2011-12-15 Thread Drew Weaver
I posted this as a bug to redhat's bugzilla I think in January of 2011.



-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
Scott Johnson
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:39 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Unplugging DVI causes Disabling IRQ #11

I have some new PC hardware I'm using with the Intel H67 chipset.  I created a 
bzImage I use for a PXE environment for a recovery mode, installing OS images, 
etc.  The new mobo doesn't have a VGA port but instead DVI.

Everytime I unplug the DVI cable it seems to cause Disabling IRQ #11.  After 
that the PC is basically unusable.  The /proc/interrupts shows that hdd, usb, 
nic, RAID controller for some reason all share the same interrupt.  What the 
heck?

I tried booting with acpi=off and the bios doesn't seem to offer any IRQ/PnP 
options.  Am I missing a specific driver in my bzImage for the
H67 chipset or any ideas of what I could try next?  It's been a sad day.

bash-2.05b# cat /proc/interrupts
   CPU0
  0:   15185951XT-PIC-XTtimer
  1:  4XT-PIC-XTi8042
  2:  0XT-PIC-XTcascade
  7: 75XT-PIC-XTehci_hcd:usb2
  8:  1XT-PIC-XTrtc
 11:2090574XT-PIC-XTahci, ehci_hcd:usb1, eth0, rr172x

I even see a similar error on a fresh CentOS 5.7 install:

irq 169: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)

Call Trace:
 IRQ  [800bdf66] __report_bad_irq+0x30/0x7d  [800be1a4] 
note_interrupt+0x1f1/0x232  [800bd6a5] __do_IRQ+0xfa/0x140  
[8006d4c1] do_IRQ+0xe9/0xf7  [8005d615] 
ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa  EOI  [801a2220] acpi_safe_halt+0x25/0x36  
[801a2a88] acpi_processor_idle_simple+0xe6/0x31c
 [801a29a2] acpi_processor_idle_simple+0x0/0x31c
 [80048fe2] cpu_idle+0x95/0xb8  [80078a9a] 
start_secondary+0x479/0x488

handlers:
[801fc748] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x55) Disabling IRQ #169

Thanks for any help.
-ScottEJ
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cause for kernel panic

2011-12-15 Thread Nicolas Ross
   From this, is there a way to determine the cause ? kdump is not
 confirgured nor used, since the fencing of the node renders kdump 
 useless.

 This is the second time in a few weeks it happens.

 /var/log/messages should have more information; could you include it?

No, unfortunently, the last message in the log is a normal one, an after 
that it's the boot process.

I will look at netconsole as Ross suggested.

Regards, 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Apache httpd-2.2.15 updates

2011-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Dirce,

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:17 -0500, drsyst...@globalcerts.net wrote:
 I did some research on the Internet, but can't find the following
 information: are most of the security fixes that appear in httpd-2.2.21
 applied to the update on httpd-2.2.15-9?

As CentOS is merely a rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise Linux it's probably
best to subscribe to the enterprise watch list
( https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-watch-list ) if you
want to keep track of upstream security fixes. Note that this list only
announces security fixes not bug fixes.

For a full list of update announcements visit
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/ . Note that CentOS-6 is a merge of the
different versions Red Hat provides, so you might have to browse
multiple lists to get a complete overview.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cause for kernel panic

2011-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Corey,

On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 20:50 -0700, Corey Henderson wrote:
 /var/log/messages should have more information; could you include it?

Please do not ask people to include log files or other attachments to a
public mailing list! Information like that should be pasted online (f.e.
at http://pastebin.com/ ) and a link to the resource should be used.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Missing nss dependency nss-softokn

2011-12-15 Thread Cal Webster
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 02:14 -0800, John Doe wrote:
 From: Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com
 
  Error: Package: nss-3.12.10-2.el6_1.x86_64 (updates)
  Requires: nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.9
  Installed: nss-softokn-3.12.7-1.1.el6.x86_64
  (@anaconda-CentOS-201106060106.x86_64/6.0)
 nss-softokn(x86-64) = 3.12.7-1.1.el6
  I realize I need to swap in the 6.1 ISO on our internal mirror but the
  missing package doesn't appear to be on the mirrors either.
 
 It is in /os:
 
 .../6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-softokn-3.12.9-3.el6.i686.rpm
 .../6/os/x86_64/Packages/nss-softokn-3.12.9-3.el6.x86_64.rpm

Thanks. You're right. I was looking for a version match
(nss-softokn-3.12.10-2). Got the 6.1 ISO now so this should be resolved.

./Cal


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/15/2011 12:37 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
 On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
 To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
 for priority settings?  It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-)   Thanks

 It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base
 packages. This should only be used by hand per package basis.

 I have created local repository where I copy packages I wish to replace
 and only that third-party repository has same priority as official
 repositories.

 RPMForge (now RepoForge) has non-violent, or safe repository that
 *should not* contain packages that overwrite base packages, and
 violent repository named extras that is meant to overwrite base
 packages.

 Thanks.  I think that makes it clear - it seems that if I see this sort
 of problem again I have to look at repositories that are not normally
 enabled, and consider whether to temporarily enable them.  Is it safe to
 leave rpmfusion-free-updates.repo and rpmfusion-nonree-updates.repo
 without a specific priority setting?  The various testing repos are not
 enabled.


You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have 
yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with 
lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3, 
rpmfusion-* =3, etc.

Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
There are few changes needed like torakat repo with now centosplus 
kernels.


-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 82, Issue 10

2011-12-15 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 pidgin  Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 pidginUpdate
  (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 pidgin  Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 pidginUpdate
  (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:41:24 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 5 i386
pidgin  Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111214194124.ga8...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1820 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
3674fc7a5e1f377a6d9c4cfb5d2dd6cbf9835a388d250e0b8f709229b3b65a57  
finch-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
137212f38c28475d2bef1e494b92482a17e52d61b8f81b657acc7c49c97a064f  
finch-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
01e0e301d3980c65c1964e43a91026e15080aa571cab05f7d9300764a11ed112  
libpurple-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
798e49aaf2b26bd5e449fe5a89c4cda5b7ca0a1ed7b3f1a76393a8385c646cac  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
660c71689333ec41338b79b8fd0fdcd34a0a2953f92537f4fedfe92508ab415c  
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
64c21ef224e0d1777bc05124b5407581cbae865c8b9542299fa5e7c7a8f15cb7  
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
3608029cca6e3546175e4642becacb3285ccf98803150faf72b5bab45a964130  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
72b812daf7bbca1d3601dba97f69efd7fb68ca90439a8fbe465a397c6c5ea6cb  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
54a829623329970130c6f5ace5dfd9f6920e65ae07c4b01490ef39acd14f4e33  
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm

Source:
490774f8a7a83d9c75c5ca24ca5d0518443fecc4d8347d073a7eb1a797620c36  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.src.rpm


-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:41:24 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1820 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64
pidgin  Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20111214194124.ga8...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1820 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1820.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
3674fc7a5e1f377a6d9c4cfb5d2dd6cbf9835a388d250e0b8f709229b3b65a57  
finch-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
1675eeb73c3afbf82c1bdd0e4b6e54f972baf98c1c0f19fa67c12af19347f957  
finch-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
137212f38c28475d2bef1e494b92482a17e52d61b8f81b657acc7c49c97a064f  
finch-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
b78204663c32a118553ddcc1bf36cca307b0e1e0ea5197af3821348efd91f1e4  
finch-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
01e0e301d3980c65c1964e43a91026e15080aa571cab05f7d9300764a11ed112  
libpurple-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
26305cab8f13626a1d5fc52a0cf78337a8da24aa49ca125bb095d27165d5d69e  
libpurple-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
798e49aaf2b26bd5e449fe5a89c4cda5b7ca0a1ed7b3f1a76393a8385c646cac  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
5d6ffb2246080f26a7997d073bacfcc5f2173f44d58dab49bf5abf5abc48f32f  
libpurple-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
7b4e813b7b8b3785214b1cf030b8a4a49444676700a2102364b00994fa864155  
libpurple-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
d4028e9ad49cb86b60f40cbbe8189709b581bebb9ee4e45fba1ff38f11823460  
libpurple-tcl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
3608029cca6e3546175e4642becacb3285ccf98803150faf72b5bab45a964130  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
785322476c8d1aec41d8f3fe537ae365dbca1182a6083dd352c4087939a3491b  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
72b812daf7bbca1d3601dba97f69efd7fb68ca90439a8fbe465a397c6c5ea6cb  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.i386.rpm
de4a9f21cb50fcf4205baae94143b586c40f83972dcd95ab7ae50b91215d1809  
pidgin-devel-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm
ea6f417605f82adda88bd6ab574a37077e198ac59445703da0a16aae26e9d03d  
pidgin-perl-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.x86_64.rpm

Source:
490774f8a7a83d9c75c5ca24ca5d0518443fecc4d8347d073a7eb1a797620c36  
pidgin-2.6.6-5.el5_7.4.src.rpm


-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, 

Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

 
 You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have 
 yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with 
 lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3, 
 rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
 
 Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
 http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
 There are few changes needed like torakat repo with now centosplus 
 kernels.
 
Thanks.  That's really helpful.  I'll go through mine now and check that
they all have the right priorities.

Thanks again

Anne
-- 
Need KDE help?  Try
http://userbase.kde.org or
Http://forum.kde.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Static routes with a metric?

2011-12-15 Thread Matt Garman
Adding additional info for posterity, and in case anyone else runs
across this...

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote:
 On 12/7/2011 10:03 AM, Matt Garman wrote:
 Hi,

 [...]

 What I basically need to be able to do is this:
 route add -host h1 gw g1 metric 0
 route add -host h1 gw g2 metric 10

 Notice that everything is the same except the gateway and metric. I could
 put this in /etc/rc.local, but was wondering if there's a cleaner way to do
 it in e.g. the network-scripts directory.


 If you create files in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory
 named according to the scheme

 route-eth0
 route-eth1
 route-eth2

 it will execute each line in the files as

 /sbin/ip route add line

 when each interface is brought up.

 Look in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes script for all
 the gory details and features.

I actually did just that---looked at the ifup-routes script.  The
thing that threw me off is the comments about older format versus
new format.  I probably read into the comments too much, but I
thought to myself, I should probably use the new format, as they
might some day deprecate the old format.

But anyway, the older format is what I need.  With the older format,
it's exactly what you said above: each line corresponds to running ip
route add line.  So what I added were lines in this format:

addr/mask via gateway dev device metric N

A contrived example might be:

10.25.77.0/24 via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 metric 5

The new format is where each group of three lines corresponds to a
route.  You have the ADDRESSxx=, NETMASKxx=, GATEWAYxx= lines.
Clearly this is less flexible, particularly if you need to set a
metric like me.  :)

Anyway, hopefully that's useful for anyone in a similar situation!

-Matt
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:

 You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
 yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
 lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
 rpmfusion-* =3, etc.

Does this always do what you want when things appear in different
repos?  Like something you have installed from extras being added
later to EPEL, etc.?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
 http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
 There are few changes needed like torakat repo with now centosplus 
 kernels.

Can you explain, please, about those exclude=*releases statements?
What exactly are they excluding?

Anne
-- 
Need KDE help?  Try
http://userbase.kde.org or
Http://forum.kde.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/15/2011 01:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:

 You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
 yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
 lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
 rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
 
 Does this always do what you want when things appear in different
 repos?  Like something you have installed from extras being added
 later to EPEL, etc.?
 
Obviously not ...

If you actually want something from a lower rated repo, you must add an:

exclude=package_name

in the higher rated repo.  That in effect no longer looks for the
package in the higher rated repo and gets it from the next one down the
list.

Since all repos do not test the others for interactivity, and since
every user might have different repos than everyone else (including
local ones, etc.) ... there is no one size fits all solution for adding
more than just the base repos.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:27 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs  wrote:

 You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
 yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
 lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
 rpmfusion-* =3, etc.

 Does this always do what you want when things appear in different
 repos?  Like something you have installed from extras being added
 later to EPEL, etc.?


Plugin Priorities hides packages with the same name, leaving only 
package from the repo with top most priority (lower number). This 
prevents visibility and installability of packages in repo's with lower 
priority (higher number). You can still see them if you add 
--showduplicates --disableplugin=priorities.

EPEL is base-repo friendly, so there should be no problems with EPEL. 
Trick comes with RepoForge (ex-RPMForge), aTrpms, and other third party 
repo's. Policy of the RepoForge for example is that they will not 
recompile their own packages if package they depend on is bumped in EPEL 
and overrides RepoForge's package with same name. I do understand them, 
they have limited time and infrastructure to always keep up with EPEL.

But only real problems are with Audio/Video packages: players, codecs 
(decoders, encoders), and supporting libraries. In order to be sure that 
those packages will work without interruptions, players are compiled 
with hard-coded dependencies on particular version of libraries, codec 
packages, etc.

We can narrow it down even further to decoders/encoders with licensing 
issues like MP3. Upstream, CentOS consequently, and EPEL compile for 
example gstreamer package without license infringing codecs, but all 
others do. What people do is to install gstreamer from third party repo 
with gstreamer-bad (or was it -ugly) additional packages. So when 
upstream or EPEL publishes another version of gstreamer, hard-coded 
gstreamer-bad dependancy conflicts with new package. So third-party repo 
would have to rebuild their entire audio/video package group to avoid 
conflicts. Solution would be that there is communication between 
EPEL(/upstream) maintainer and third party repos.

So there will always be complications, but they are limited to 
audio/video packages (mostly).

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Perl package problems

2011-12-15 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:32 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
 On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
 Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
 http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
 There are few changes needed like torakat repo with now centosplus
 kernels.

 Can you explain, please, about those exclude=*releases statements?
 What exactly are they excluding?


I use exclude=*releases so I no repository release package (like 
centos-release, or epel-release) will update/install *.repo files in 
/etc/yum/repos.d/ and in doing so add repository entries not controled 
by me.

But there is an error I just saw, it should be exclude=*release, 
without the trailing s. I will have to fix this as soon as possible.

Explanation:

When I install CentOS systems, I move original *.repo files to backup 
subdirectory because they do not contain Enabled= and Priorities= 
lines, and leave only my own .repo file. If there is no 
exclude=*release line, then next update of xxx-release would see that 
their .repo files are missing and would reinstall them. New .repo 
files would then circumvent priorities plugin and all my work was for 
nothing.

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote:
 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

ethtool, or even lshw.

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM,  m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

 ethtool, or even lshw.


How do you make ethtool iterate over the available interfaces?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] installing gnome, CentOS 6.1

2011-12-15 Thread m . roth
I just rebuilt a box to 6.1 for a user. Shortly after I delivered, she
came up to ask about gnome; it had come up as KDE. I looked at the login
screen, and in the session type, saw previous, custom, kde, and default.
When I investigated, I found not all 7,532,340 gnome packages were
installed. Googling for responses only in the last month, I found a lot of
groupinstall GNOME Desktop Environment, as opposed to what I put in our
PXEboot file months ago, GNOME Desktop Environment (RPM Fusion Free).
That didn't work either, and after a bit more googling, found people
saying groupinstall Desktop.

So, is upstream so GNOMEly that the rest of the desktops/window managers
are just chopped liver?

   mark, annoyed at having to change the ks.cgi *again*

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM,  m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

 ethtool, or even lshw.

 How do you make ethtool iterate over the available interfaces?

I suppose that would be a script. lshw - which is clearer than just
dmidecode, would do it.

Dumb question: in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, do the ifcfg-* have
HWADDRs?

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] installing gnome, CentOS 6.1

2011-12-15 Thread m . roth
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 09:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 PXEboot file months ago, GNOME Desktop Environment (RPM Fusion Free).

 So wherever that came from, it wasent CentOS

I dunno - I used it to install a very early version of 6. *shrug*

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-15 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:48 PM, anax a...@ayni.com wrote:
 Hi Rudi
 we once had a similar problem on a Web:

 This Web had this in particular that its home-page needed to be deleted
 daily and of course reinstalled immediately.
 Then, in a new version of the Web it did not need this delete/reinstall
 cycle any more, so the webadmin just removed the link to the delete
 script. He did not remove the delete-script itself from the Web.
 The effect was, that the home-page was still deleted at random times.

 What we then found out: We used an internal Search-Engine which crawled
 this web. And this Search-Engine had not forgotten the link to the
 delete-script, but invoked it at random times, whenever it crawled  the
 particular Web.

 Your case: could it be something similar?

 suomi



Thanx for the advice. We found a script which seems to have been
modified somehow, probably  hacker or a rootkit - don't yet know, but
we're looking to see if we can trace it down.
I don't want to reveal the code here due to it's uniqueness and I
don't want to attrack further attension to the sites by the
attack(er).


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 15.12.2011 22:13, schrieb Les Mikesell:
 On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:56 PM,  m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

 ethtool, or even lshw.

 
 How do you make ethtool iterate over the available interfaces?

How about following?

for i in /sys/class/net/eth*; do
  echo ${i##*/}: 
  cat $i/{carrier,address}
done

Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 12/15/2011 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces
/sbin/ip link ls

-- 
Benjamin Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM,  m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

 ethtool, or even lshw.

 How do you make ethtool iterate over the available interfaces?

 I suppose that would be a script. lshw - which is clearer than just
 dmidecode, would do it.

 Dumb question: in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, do the ifcfg-* have
 HWADDRs?

They do, but the case I want to cover is where an existing server is
cloned, or the disk has been moved from a failed chassis to a spare.
And in this case the existing files will be wrong, and the nics will
be named more or less randomly.   Assume the hands-on operators don't
know much about linux and you can't actively help until they get at
least one of the right IP's on the right NIC.

With 5.x I'd use mii-tool to find the connected interface (connecting
one wire at a time if necessary), then ifconfig on that interface to
get the hwaddr, then edit that into the ifcfg-* file for the names I
want the active NICs to have, and reboot.   That's awkward enough to
ask someone to do who already prefers windows, and it looks like it
just got harder by having to explicitly run mii-tool for each possible
interface (and we always have 4 to 6 per box).   There has to be a
better way.   I thought 6.1 was going to have a new NIC name
convention but I haven't had time to look into it and have to make
something work now.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 12:45 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces
 /sbin/ip link ls


That looks promising.   And '/sbin/ip addr'  shows both the state and
the mac address - even better.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cause for kernel panic

2011-12-15 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 09:51:52 AM Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 Please do not ask people to include log files or other attachments to a
 public mailing list! Information like that should be pasted online (f.e.
 at http://pastebin.com/ ) and a link to the resource should be used.

I must disagree with this; for IRC this is appropriate, since typical IRC chat 
logs are not indexed by google and the like, nor are questioners encouraged to 
read the archives of the IRC logs.

I can't count the times I've searched for a solution to a problem, found 
someone with the same issue posting online, tracked down some potential 
solution, only to find that the pastebin referenced as having the solution was 
no longer there.

Ditto for links to fixes on rapidshare, megaupload, googledocs, and kin.  It 
would be nice to excerpt logs and fixes for future searching through google or 
directly through the archives.  

Or, to put it more bluntly, you shouldn't tell people to search the archives 
but then have people put essential data on an ephemeral resource that is 
dissociated from the archive.

IMHO, of course.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] installing gnome, CentOS 6.1

2011-12-15 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 12/15/2011 03:37 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 12/15/2011 09:21 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 PXEboot file months ago, GNOME Desktop Environment (RPM Fusion Free).
 
 So wherever that came from, it wasent CentOS

yum groupinstall Desktop Platform Desktop X Window System

If you are pointed to CentOS-6.1 that will give you a full desktop with
gnome.

RPM Fusion is nothing to do with CentOS Gnome.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Ross Walker
On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:

 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

In 5 an 'ifconfig' without parameters would only list up interfaces and one 
would have to do an 'ifconfig -a' to see all interfaces. Maybe still true in 6?

-Ross

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-15 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:29 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
 From: Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com

 For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we
 checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is
 on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still
 worked fine. The photo is 482Kb in size.

 Only the size changed to 0 or were some other stats changed too?
 Maybe try something like:
   inotifywait -m --format %T %e %f --timefmt %D %T -r /path/to/dir
 At least you would know at what time something happens...

 JD
 ___



John,

Where do I get inotifywait ?


yum what provides */inotifywait didn't return anything


root@mars:[/]$ yum whatprovides */inotifywait
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.highspeedweb.net
 * extras: centos.omnispring.com
 * updates: mirrors.igsobe.com
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
extras/filelists_db

| 206 kB 00:00
updates/filelists_db

| 1.7 MB 00:00
No Matches found


-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:

 In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and show
 which have link up.   In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter.
 What is the appropriate way to find which of some number of of
 interfaces are connected?   Better yet, what is the least typing to
 get the mac addresses of those interfaces?

 In 5 an 'ifconfig' without parameters would only list up interfaces and one 
 would have to do an 'ifconfig -a' to see all interfaces. Maybe still true in 
 6?


That's not just 'link up' though. Those are ones that are
'administratively up' with an address assigned.  That would be the
same set with the default configuration and DHCP service available on
all subnets, but we don't have that.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
  lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption

2011-12-15 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
Vreme: 12/16/2011 12:22 AM, Rudi Ahlers piše:
 John,

 Where do I get inotifywait ?


 yum what provides */inotifywait didn't return anything


 root@mars:[/]$ yum whatprovides */inotifywait
 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
   * base: mirror.highspeedweb.net
   * extras: centos.omnispring.com
   * updates: mirrors.igsobe.com
 Excluding Packages in global exclude list
 Finished
 extras/filelists_db

 | 206 kB 00:00
 updates/filelists_db

 | 1.7 MB 00:00
 No Matches found



inotify-tools from EPEL?

-- 

Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos