Re: [CentOS-es] Instalación para varias máquinas clientes
On 05/25/2012 12:49 AM, Juan Pablo Botero wrote: Gracias por las respuestas. No recordaba la opción del netinstall, estaba pensando en alguna opción que involucre PXE. pxe, buenazo, realmente, con él te ahorras el tener que insertar un cd o usb para arrancar saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Instalación para varias máquinas clientes
Podrías hacer un spin de un CD o DVD de instalación CentOS, que tenga opciones de autoconfiguración post-install, para que lo dejes trabajando y te olvides de ese PC. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD A priori, no recuerdo si la configuración varía mucho de la mostrada en Fedora, pero debería no ser excesivamente distinta. La ventaja de tener un ISO de instalación personalizado es que simplemente te creas un repositorio local, haces que tus máquinas se actualicen en ese repo, y dejas corriendo la instalación como si la estuvieras haciendo de forma manual, con lo que puedes hacer una sola ISO para distintos computadores con distintos componentes. Obviamente te creas una ISO de 32-bit y otra de 64-bit, con sus respectivas aplicaciones y/o configuraciones especiales. El 25 de mayo de 2012 09:39, Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@ecualinux.comescribió: On 05/25/2012 12:49 AM, Juan Pablo Botero wrote: Gracias por las respuestas. No recordaba la opción del netinstall, estaba pensando en alguna opción que involucre PXE. pxe, buenazo, realmente, con él te ahorras el tener que insertar un cd o usb para arrancar saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos *Héctor Herrera Anabalón* Egresado ICCI UNAP Soporte IT en CNN Chile Miembro USoLIX Victoria Registered User #548600 (LinuxCounter.net) +56983118902 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Dissculpenme, yo queria descargar el S.O CentOS 5.6 para DVDpero no se donde descargarlo. Me gustaria que apoyen por ladescarga...Gracia! y saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
On 05/25/2012 11:31 AM, Lorenzo Diaz Perez wrote: Dissculpenme, yo queria descargar el S.O CentOS 5.6 para DVDpero no se donde descargarlo. Me gustaria que apoyen por ladescarga...Gracia! hola Lorenzo como no indicas si 32 o 64 aquí te va: http://centos.mirror.iweb.ca/5/isos/ saludos epe y saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Sólo por curiosidad... Por qué tiene que ser CentOS 5.6? No te sirve 5.8? De todas maneras, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/ tiene los mirrors de CentOS 5.x El 25 de mayo de 2012 13:36, Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@ecualinux.comescribió: On 05/25/2012 11:31 AM, Lorenzo Diaz Perez wrote: Dissculpenme, yo queria descargar el S.O CentOS 5.6 para DVDpero no se donde descargarlo. Me gustaria que apoyen por ladescarga...Gracia! hola Lorenzo como no indicas si 32 o 64 aquí te va: http://centos.mirror.iweb.ca/5/isos/ saludos epe y saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos *Héctor Herrera Anabalón* Egresado ICCI UNAP Soporte IT en CNN Chile Miembro USoLIX Victoria Registered User #548600 (LinuxCounter.net) +56983118902 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Tienes que buscar en la boveda xD http://vault.centos.org/5.4/isos/i386/ -- Alexander Labrador a.k.a rednaxel4 User : GNU/Linux Debian , CentOS 5.x, FreeBSD LinuxCounter: 447825 xmpp:rednax...@xmpp.org.ve Cel: 0412-1863547 Twitter : @rednaxel4 Blog Personal - http://rednaxel4.mooo.com | http://rednaxel4.ploud.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Mi error, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/ solamente tiene CentOS 5.8 (o al menos no tiene la ISO de CentOS 5.6) El 25 de mayo de 2012 13:41, Héctor Herrera hherre...@gmail.com escribió: Sólo por curiosidad... Por qué tiene que ser CentOS 5.6? No te sirve 5.8? De todas maneras, http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/ tiene los mirrors de CentOS 5.x El 25 de mayo de 2012 13:36, Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@ecualinux.comescribió: On 05/25/2012 11:31 AM, Lorenzo Diaz Perez wrote: Dissculpenme, yo queria descargar el S.O CentOS 5.6 para DVDpero no se donde descargarlo. Me gustaria que apoyen por ladescarga...Gracia! hola Lorenzo como no indicas si 32 o 64 aquí te va: http://centos.mirror.iweb.ca/5/isos/ saludos epe y saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos *Héctor Herrera Anabalón* Egresado ICCI UNAP Soporte IT en CNN Chile Miembro USoLIX Victoria Registered User #548600 (LinuxCounter.net) +56983118902 -- Saludos *Héctor Herrera Anabalón* Egresado ICCI UNAP Soporte IT en CNN Chile Miembro USoLIX Victoria Registered User #548600 (LinuxCounter.net) +56983118902 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Revisen los mirror que envían, asi dejan de publicar link que no tiene ninguna iso -- Alexander Labrador a.k.a rednaxel4 User : GNU/Linux Debian , CentOS 5.x, FreeBSD LinuxCounter: 447825 xmpp:rednax...@xmpp.org.ve Cel: 0412-1863547 Twitter : @rednaxel4 Blog Personal - http://rednaxel4.mooo.com | http://rednaxel4.ploud.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Aqui http://vault.centos.org/ existen todas las versiones disponibles.. Centos 5.6 -- http://vault.centos.org/5.6/isos/i386/ -- Alexander Labrador a.k.a rednaxel4 User : GNU/Linux Debian , CentOS 5.x, FreeBSD LinuxCounter: 447825 xmpp:rednax...@xmpp.org.ve Cel: 0412-1863547 Twitter : @rednaxel4 Blog Personal - http://rednaxel4.mooo.com | http://rednaxel4.ploud.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
On 05/25/2012 11:43 AM, Alexander Jose Labrador Guevara wrote: Revisen los mirror que envían, asi dejan de publicar link que no tiene ninguna iso exactamente a quién va dirigido esto? revisa lo que escribes para saber a quién va y poder ser de utilidad ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Instalación para varias máquinas clientes
Solo a modo de dar un aporte, ahora que mencionan lo del repositorio local, aqui hay un pequeño review que hice hace unos 3 años en mi blog y que procedi a actualizarlo. Quizas pueda ser de su ayuda. http://cipher.pe/web/nuestra-experiencia/31-repositorio-interno-de-actualizaciones-totalmente-transparente-para-centos.html A nosotros nos ayudó muchisimo, dado que se terminaron los dolores de cabeza en lo que se refiere al ancho de banda. Saludos, -- Ing CIP. Alejandro Celi Mariátegui a...@linux.org.pe http://cipher.pe/web/servicios.html El vie, 25-05-2012 a las 10:00 -0300, Héctor Herrera escribió: Podrías hacer un spin de un CD o DVD de instalación CentOS, que tenga opciones de autoconfiguración post-install, para que lo dejes trabajando y te olvides de ese PC. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD A priori, no recuerdo si la configuración varía mucho de la mostrada en Fedora, pero debería no ser excesivamente distinta. La ventaja de tener un ISO de instalación personalizado es que simplemente te creas un repositorio local, haces que tus máquinas se actualicen en ese repo, y dejas corriendo la instalación como si la estuvieras haciendo de forma manual, con lo que puedes hacer una sola ISO para distintos computadores con distintos componentes. Obviamente te creas una ISO de 32-bit y otra de 64-bit, con sus respectivas aplicaciones y/o configuraciones especiales. El 25 de mayo de 2012 09:39, Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@ecualinux.comescribió: On 05/25/2012 12:49 AM, Juan Pablo Botero wrote: Gracias por las respuestas. No recordaba la opción del netinstall, estaba pensando en alguna opción que involucre PXE. pxe, buenazo, realmente, con él te ahorras el tener que insertar un cd o usb para arrancar saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto)
Muchas gracias por el dato, encontré el que buscaba Atte Jose Manuel GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE --- El vie, 25/5/12, Alexander Jose Labrador Guevara globehack...@gmail.com escribió: De: Alexander Jose Labrador Guevara globehack...@gmail.com Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] (sin asunto) Para: centos-es@centos.org Fecha: viernes, 25 de mayo, 2012 18:45 Aqui http://vault.centos.org/ existen todas las versiones disponibles.. Centos 5.6 -- http://vault.centos.org/5.6/isos/i386/ -- Alexander Labrador a.k.a rednaxel4 User : GNU/Linux Debian , CentOS 5.x, FreeBSD LinuxCounter: 447825 xmpp:rednax...@xmpp.org.ve Cel: 0412-1863547 Twitter : @rednaxel4 Blog Personal - http://rednaxel4.mooo.com | http://rednaxel4.ploud.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Installing CIFS on CentOS4
Dear Jeff, On Thu, 24 May 2012 15:16:13 -1000 Jeff Sadino jsadino.que...@gmail.com wrote: I have a CentOS4 install and I am trying to mount a Windows Server 2008 folder. When I use this command: You can try the sernet samba repositories. http://www.sernet.de/en/ http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/centos/4/sernet-samba.repo There are packages for various samba versions. Brgds -- Freundliche Gruesse/Best Regards Benjamin Hackl IT/Administration Media FOCUS Research Ges.m.b.H. Maculangasse 8, 1220 Wien Austria Tel: +43 1 258 97 01-295 b.ha...@focusmr.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openldap mmr + heartbeat hot standby
Dear Wessel, I'd do the following. give both servers a static non changing IP: ldapA.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.1 on eth0 ldapB.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.2 on eth0 These two IPs will always be the same. You can access ldapA or ldapB anytime via it's designated name. For failover, use an alias: ldap.yourdomain.tld, e.g. 10.0.0.3 on eth0:0 on the active node Don't tell heartbeat of openldap and everything should be good. Brgds -- Freundliche Gruesse/Best Regards Benjamin Hackl IT/Administration Media FOCUS Research Ges.m.b.H. Maculangasse 8, 1220 Wien Austria Tel: +43 1 258 97 01-295 b.ha...@focusmr.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] compiling python
Hello, I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas would be much appreciated. -- --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 14.23.31 Alan McKay wrote: Hey folks, ... I used 'arcconf' to create a big RAID60 out of (see below). But then I mount it and it is way too small This should be about 20TB : ... /dev/sdb1 186G 60M 176G 1% /mnt/J4400-1 ... Here is how I created it : ./arcconf create 1 logicaldrive name J4400-1-RAID60 max 60 0 0 0 1 0 2 ... Make 1 big partition : sfdisk /dev/sdb EOF ,,L EOF This is the problem, various filesystems issues are irrelevant. sfdisk only uses the old msdos type partition table and this does not support 2T devices. It is unfortunate that it lacks proper error checking and warnings... You should do one of: 1) don't use partitioning (mkfs directly on /dev/sdb) 2) use LVM (pvcreate /dev/sdb ...) 3) use a GPT type partition table (parted /dev/sdb or similar) After this you'll have to tackle the current 16T limit for ext4 and other filesystem related oddities.. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] compiling python
From: Rita rmorgan...@gmail.com I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas would be much appreciated. Read the file README from the python tar.gz file. Use --prefix. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] compiling python
Rita wrote on 05/25/2012 06:29 AM: Hello, I would like to compile python 2.7.3 for centos and was wondering if there were any instructions I should follow. I would like to keep the standard python the way it is. I would like to compile to /opt. Any tips or ideas would be much appreciated. Some advice on python 2.7 from the list archives: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-April/125174.html http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-May/125808.html Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313
Hello, The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac since 2.6.39). But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? Thanks, -- Philippe Naudin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313
On 25 May 2012 08:39, Philippe Naudin philippe.nau...@supagro.inra.frwrote: Hello, The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac since 2.6.39). But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? Thanks, -- Philippe Naudin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Philippe, You can try ELRepo, I believe that they have the drivers for boderdom, they also have kernel 3.3.x, please read their note about using kernel 3.3.x. I have tried it and I did not have any issues with it. http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313
Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM: Hello, The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac since 2.6.39). But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? Thanks, Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports your hardware with the standard kernel. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Dedup FS on 5.8
Hey folks, I have a 14TB disk array that I want to use for rsnapshot backups, and am considering putting a dedup FS onto it. I know I've got about a TB of duplication, at least. And it is not easy to remove manually. Google lands me LessFS and SDFS as the prime candidates. thanks, -Alan -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dedup FS on 5.8
Whoops, sorry - looking for opinions and personal experiences -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc
Johnny Hughes wrote:
First, thanks very much for continuing to help me.
On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
---
Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 !=
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686
** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
bash-4.1.2-9.el6_2.x86_64 is a duplicate with
bash-4.1.2-8.el6.centos.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64
is a duplicate with glibc- common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64
glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc =
('0', '2.12', '1.47.el6_2.12')
---
You have both the i686 and x86_64 versions of glibc installed. That
error means that the repo you are trying to update from has a different
version of i686 glibc and x86_64 glibc ... or you are trying to upgrade
one (the x86_64 version) and not the other (the i686 version).
Since multilib installs share some files (all the Documentation, etc.),
that means you must install the same version of each arch if you install
both i686 and x86_64 packages.
Thank you very much for your response.
But I'm afraid I'm not clear what action I can take.
I don't like to remove any glibc or glibc-common packages,
as I'm afraid it might have a disastrous effect,
since they seem to be required by so many other packages,
including the kernel.
Based on your errors, what I would do is this:
1. You only need 1 version of glibc-common.x86_64. The only way you
could have gotten into this position is either your machine died in the
middle of a yum update or someone force installed the later glibc-common
via the rpm -i command.
I would first try to install the yum-utils package with this command:
I do have this package installed.
once that is installed, I would try:
yum-complete-transaction
When I run this, an enormous list of packages (I think over 300)
that will be deleted appears, eg
-
--- Package kdelibs-common.x86_64 6:4.3.4-11.el6_1.4 will be erased
--- Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-220.2.1.el6 will be erased
--- Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-220.4.1.el6 will be erased
--- Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-220.7.1.el6 will be erased
--- Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-220.13.1.el6 will be erased
-
But before I can answer yes or no, the command fails with
-
Error: Trying to remove yum, which is protected
-
I still get this error if I say yum-complete-transaction --exclude=yum
I would figure out exactly what packages I had installed for glibc and
get them all on one version ... you need to be careful with glibc (and
its sub packages) ... it is the most important package on your machine.
The only glibc* packages listed in /var/log/yum.* are 64-bit, eg
-
[tim@alfred ~]$ sudo grep glibc /var/log/yum*
/var/log/yum.log:Feb 07 02:20:29 Updated: glibc-
common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.5.x86_64
/var/log/yum.log:Feb 07 02:20:45 Updated: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.5.x86_64
...
/var/log/yum.log:Mar 17 17:51:11 Updated: glibc-
common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64
/var/log/yum.log:Mar 17 17:51:24 Updated: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64
...
/var/log/yum.log:May 22 11:38:50 Installed: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64
I haven't deliberately installed any versions other than these.
This is on a server running CentOS-6.2 (in another country),
and I never say anything relevant on it except sudo yum update.
How I would do this is that I would download all the RPMs for the latest
version of all the packages you have installed ... for me that would be:
glibc-devel-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
glibc-headers-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.i686.rpm
glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
nscd-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64.rpm
After yum-update the server tried to download the 2.12 versions,
but wasn't able to for the same above reason:
I have them all on another server also running CentOS-6.2:
[tim@grover ~]$ sudo grep glibc /var/log/yum.log*
...
/var/log/yum.log:May 11 13:58:46 Updated: glibc-
common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64
/var/log/yum.log:May 11 13:59:20 Updated: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64
/var/log/yum.log:May 11 13:59:54 Updated: glibc-
headers-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64
/var/log/yum.log:May 11 13:59:59 Updated: glibc-
devel-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64
/var/log/yum.log:May 11 14:01:44 Updated: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.i686
so I could copy them from there, and forcefully install them?
Once I had them all in the same directory, I would try a:
rpm -Uvh *.rpm
then I would look at the errors
based on those errors (if it does not install) then I would likely do:
rpm -Uvh --force *.rpm
that will LIKELY clean up your rpm issues for glibc ...
Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc
Tim, Timothy Murphy wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: On 05/23/2012 04:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: snip 3. The real issue here is to make sure you figure out HOW you got in this position and how NOT to get into it again. I think I understand how it occurred. I tried to yum-remove a package (I don't remember which one, but it wasn't important) and I was told that 300+ packages would be removed. I wasn't sure it I would be asked yes/no to this (I know now that I will always be asked to approve) so I stopped the commend with ctrt-C. Since then I have had these problems. I think you have bigger problems. I don't think that ctrl-c out of yum is the problem. One dumb question: what's the output of uname -a - *are* you running a 64-bit kernel? Have you tried yum clean all? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313
Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit: Philippe Naudin wrote on 05/25/2012 08:39 AM: Hello, The support for Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless is native in the kernel since 2.6.37 (module brcm80211, renamed brcmsmac since 2.6.39). But is it backported to some kernel available for CentOS ? Thanks, Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports your hardware with the standard kernel. Phil, Earl, Thanks for pointing me to elrepo : yes, the kmod-compat-wireless page lists brcmsmac.ko. If someone else find this mail while wanting to use its bcm4313 adapter : rpm -Uvh http://elrepo.org/elrepo-release-6-4.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm download the firmware from http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/firmware/ tar xzf linux-firmware-*.tar.gz mv linux-firmware-*/brcm/ /lib/firmware/ restorecon -rv /lib/firmware depmod -a : modprobe brcmsmac ... and it works. Thanks again, -- Philippe Naudin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313
Earl Ramirez wrote on 05/25/2012 09:37 AM: Philippe, You can try ELRepo, I believe that they have the drivers for boderdom, they also have kernel 3.3.x, please read their note about using kernel 3.3.x. I have tried it and I did not have any issues with it. http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports your hardware with the standard kernel. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences
On 5/24/2012 8:00 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: I'll step out on a limb here and generalize somewhat; I would think that most CentOS users use at least one third-party repository, if the traffic on this list is any indication (and, again, I reserve the right to be wrong). So knowing how to properly determine how to use those repos (which was the OP's question, after all) is very useful indeed, IMO. On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from which repo? The rpmforge ones are fairly easy: $ rpm -qa | grep '\.rf$' but epel doesn't use the repotag, so I'm not sure how to do it. Any suggestions? -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Force permissions by directory
Is there a way to force file permissions by directory (and subdirectories under it)? For example, the user's default umask value is 022 but I want it to be 002 in certain directories. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences
From: Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and
rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from
which repo?
You could try something like this:
rpm -qa --qf %-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n
See the man for more useful tags.
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Force permissions by directory
Frank Cox wrote:
Is there a way to force file permissions by directory (and subdirectories
under it)?
For example, the user's default umask value is 022 but I want it to be 002 in
certain directories.
I have cronjobs like this to regularly give group read permissions (and
x for dirs) on /some/dir and all it's subdirs:
/usr/bin/find /some/dir -xdev ! -perm -g+r -print -exec chmod g+r \{\} +
/usr/bin/find /some/dir -xdev -type d ! -perm -g+x -print -exec chmod
g+x \{\} +
hth
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and
rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from
which repo?
You could try something like this:
rpm -qa --qf %-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n
In 6.x, yum keeps track of where packages were installed from.
yum history packages-info packagename(s)
will show that among other things. There might be a better way to get
the whole list.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences
You could try something like this:
rpm -qa --qf %-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n
In 6.x, yum keeps track of where packages were installed from.
yum history packages-info packagename(s)
Hi. From http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=240877
yum list installed | grep repositoryname
Regards,
Jesus
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences
On 5/25/2012 12:43 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com
On a related note, I have a server that is using both the epel and
rpmforge repos. Is there a way to determine which packages came from
which repo?
You could try something like this:
rpm -qa --qf %-30{NAME}%{VENDOR}\n
That looks interesting. I see four vendor names listed.
CentOS
Dag Apt Repository
Fedora Project
(none)
Is Fedora Project EPEL?
In 6.x, yum keeps track of where packages were installed from.
yum history packages-info packagename(s)
will show that among other things. There might be a better way to get
the whole list.
Unfortunately, this is an older system that I am trying to rebuild as
CentOS 6.
--
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, The Host OS on all of the above nodes will be CentOS 6.2. Below is a list of things that would be necessary. 1. Digital Certificates for each host on the PCI/DSS segment 2. SELinux on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS network segment 3. Tripwire/AIDE on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS segment 4. OS hardening scripts (e.g. Bastille Linux) 5. Firewall 6. IDS (Snort) 6. Central “syslog” server However, beyond this I would appreciate any comments/feedback / suggestion if you or your organization has undergone a PCI/DSS audit and what are the gotchas that you encountered, especially with respect to CentOS/ open source stack. I came across this which kind of brings out issues between the implementer and the PCI/DSS auditor. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15098/pci-dss-compliance-for-a-vps-using-centos Thanks very much. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
Arun Khan wrote: I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, The Host OS on all of the above nodes will be CentOS 6.2. Below is a list of things that would be necessary. 1. Digital Certificates for each host on the PCI/DSS segment 2. SELinux on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS network segment 3. Tripwire/AIDE on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS segment 4. OS hardening scripts (e.g. Bastille Linux) 5. Firewall 6. IDS (Snort) 6. Central “syslog” server However, beyond this I would appreciate any comments/feedback / snip I had a short-term contract with a company that a) did managed security, and b) was a root CA. I *think* the auditor missed one thing: as I understand it, if the three servers aren't hardwired to each other, *all* communications must be encrypted between them. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
wow, seems like quite a lot. What level of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? The only other thing I might add Are you hosting the hardware? If it's hosted else where then the facility that's hosting the hardware needs to be PCI/DSS complaint. On 5/25/2012 10:22 AM, Arun Khan wrote: I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, The Host OS on all of the above nodes will be CentOS 6.2. Below is a list of things that would be necessary. 1. Digital Certificates for each host on the PCI/DSS segment 2. SELinux on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS network segment 3. Tripwire/AIDE on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS segment 4. OS hardening scripts (e.g. Bastille Linux) 5. Firewall 6. IDS (Snort) 6. Central “syslog” server However, beyond this I would appreciate any comments/feedback / suggestion if you or your organization has undergone a PCI/DSS audit and what are the gotchas that you encountered, especially with respect to CentOS/ open source stack. I came across this which kind of brings out issues between the implementer and the PCI/DSS auditor. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15098/pci-dss-compliance-for-a-vps-using-centos Thanks very much. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
Ken godee wrote: wow, seems like quite a lot. Heh. When I was working for the company, I had a guy who sat in easy earshot who was one of their folks who dealt with questions from companies and businesses. The *easiest* one, the lowest level, was 60 or 63 questions. The serious, highest one was over 220, and really required people on at least our level to answer some of them. mark What level of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? The only other thing I might add Are you hosting the hardware? If it's hosted else where then the facility that's hosting the hardware needs to be PCI/DSS complaint. On 5/25/2012 10:22 AM, Arun Khan wrote: I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, The Host OS on all of the above nodes will be CentOS 6.2. Below is a list of things that would be necessary. 1. Digital Certificates for each host on the PCI/DSS segment 2. SELinux on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS network segment 3. Tripwire/AIDE on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS segment 4. OS hardening scripts (e.g. Bastille Linux) 5. Firewall 6. IDS (Snort) 6. Central “syslog” server However, beyond this I would appreciate any comments/feedback / suggestion if you or your organization has undergone a PCI/DSS audit and what are the gotchas that you encountered, especially with respect to CentOS/ open source stack. I came across this which kind of brings out issues between the implementer and the PCI/DSS auditor. http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/15098/pci-dss-compliance-for-a-vps-using-centos Thanks very much. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences
Bowie Bailey wrote on 05/25/2012 01:00 PM: Is Fedora Project EPEL? Yes. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
2012/5/25 Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com: I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. requirement one primary function per server. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, true also. The Host OS on all of the above nodes will be CentOS 6.2. Below is a list of things that would be necessary. 1. Digital Certificates for each host on the PCI/DSS segment Usually needed, if you use https or similar protocols. 2. SELinux on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS network segment SELinux is not usually needed. 3. Tripwire/AIDE on each Linux host in the PCI/DSS segment Ossec (www.ossec.net) can do this. 4. OS hardening scripts (e.g. Bastille Linux) Some hardening needed. 5. Firewall Hardware and software firewall on each network segment with nat enabled. 6. IDS (Snort) Ossec can do this 6. Central “syslog” server Ossec server with samhain is good solution for that. However, beyond this I would appreciate any comments/feedback / suggestion if you or your organization has undergone a PCI/DSS audit and what are the gotchas that you encountered, especially with respect to CentOS/ open source stack. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] support for Broadcom BCM4313
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Philippe Naudin philippe.nau...@supagro.inra.fr wrote: Le ven. 25 mai 2012 09:42:14 CEST, Phil Schaffner a écrit: Check http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless to see if it supports your hardware with the standard kernel. Phil, Earl, Thanks for pointing me to elrepo : yes, the kmod-compat-wireless page lists brcmsmac.ko. If someone else find this mail while wanting to use its bcm4313 adapter : rpm -Uvh http://elrepo.org/elrepo-release-6-4.el6.elrepo.noarch.rpm download the firmware from http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/firmware/ tar xzf linux-firmware-*.tar.gz mv linux-firmware-*/brcm/ /lib/firmware/ restorecon -rv /lib/firmware depmod -a : modprobe brcmsmac ... and it works. Philippe, Thank you for the note. The kmod-compat-wireless wiki page has been updated using your lines as an example for installation. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] print job gui for remote access
Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is there a GUI that I can give them? I have them running things like scribus using launchers like ssh -X machineb scribus and would like to provide similar functionality for the printer job control. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?
Greetings, I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052forum=37post_id=47945 Thanks. Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] print job gui for remote access
Frank Cox wrote: Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is there a GUI that I can give them? I have them running things like scribus using launchers like ssh -X machineb scribus and would like to provide similar functionality for the printer job control. if machine B is running cups, perhaps using the cups web interface? it should be running on port 631 (and has to be configured to allow this). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com wrote: I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052forum=37post_id=47945 It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone would want to do it at this point. Why not back up anything you might want to keep, install a nice clean Centos 6.x and put back the files you wanted? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] print job gui for remote access
On Sat, 26 May 2012 00:05:40 +0200 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Frank Cox wrote: Users on Machine A with rights to log into and run jobs on Machine B using ssh want to be able to view and cancel print jobs on Machine B. This is easily accomplished via the commandline with lpq and lprm, but is there a GUI that I can give them? I have them running things like scribus using launchers like ssh -X machineb scribus and would like to provide similar functionality for the printer job control. if machine B is running cups, perhaps using the cups web interface? it should be running on port 631 (and has to be configured to allow this). While that would work, I can imagine my phone ringing with questions about why someone's printer disappeared. I'm really just trying to front-end lpq and lprm. If I have to I'll write something to do this since it's not a complicated thing and it's an excuse to play with gtk, but I don't want to re-invent the wheel. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com wrote: I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052forum=37post_id=47945 It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone would want to do it at this point. Why not back up anything you might want to keep, install a nice clean Centos 6.x and put back the files you wanted? It's a test machine that replicates a production server. The production machine was setup in May 2011 when CentOS was in 5.8 and no 6.x had shown up. So, I need a text 5.x box. So do you (or anyone) second this or am I going to have to find out on my own and report back to you. Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Upgrading FC2 to CentOS 5.* - anyone second this?
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com wrote: I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052forum=37post_id=47945 It might possibly work, but I can't quite imagine why anyone would want to do it at this point. Why not back up anything you might want to keep, install a nice clean Centos 6.x and put back the files you wanted? It's a test machine that replicates a production server. The production machine was setup in May 2011 when CentOS was in 5.8 and no 6.x had shown up. So, I need a text 5.x box. Even so, what's the point of an in-place upgrade compared to a fresh 5.x install?Even if it works, there will be old cruft left around that you don't need and that may cause surprises later. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum problem with glibc
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I think I understand how it occurred. I tried to yum-remove a package (I don't remember which one, but it wasn't important) and I was told that 300+ packages would be removed. I wasn't sure it I would be asked yes/no to this (I know now that I will always be asked to approve) so I stopped the commend with ctrt-C. Since then I have had these problems. I think you have bigger problems. I don't think that ctrl-c out of yum is the problem. One dumb question: what's the output of uname -a - *are* you running a 64-bit kernel? Thanks for your response. [tim@alfred glibc]$ uname -a Linux alfred.gayleard.eu 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 16 00:01:37 BST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Have you tried yum clean all? I have. More than once. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] biggest disk partition on 5.8?
Greetings, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey folks, I have a Sun J4400 SAS1 disk array with 24 x 1T drives in it connected to a Sunfire x2250 running 5.8 ( 64 bit ) You can perhaps think about using GFS apart from XFS -- Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Mysterious versioning reported by file command
I just noticed this, which doesn't actually seem to affect anything but does
create a mystery:
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ cat test.c
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
printf(Hello world\n);
return 0;
}
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ gcc -o test test.c
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ file test
test: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked
(uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, not stripped
[frankcox@mutt temp]$ uname -a
Linux mutt.melvilletheatre.net 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed May 16
00:01:37 BST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Why does the output from file say Linux 2.6.18 when the actual kernel in use
is 2.6.32?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ken godee k...@perfect-image.com wrote: wow, seems like quite a lot. What level of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will be encrypted and stored in client's own db. The only other thing I might add Are you hosting the hardware? If it's hosted else where then the facility that's hosting the hardware needs to be PCI/DSS complaint. The client will be hosting it on their own office premise (the physical security aspect is being handled by another vendor). Thanks, -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
Hi Eero, On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: 2012/5/25 Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com: I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. requirement one primary function per server. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, true also. ... snip ... Thanks for your input on each points in OP. I appreciate it. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
2012/5/26 Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com: Hi Eero, On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: 2012/5/25 Arun Khan knu...@gmail.com: I have a client project to implement PCI/DSS compliance. The PCI/DSS auditor has stipulated that the web server, application middleware (tomcat), the db server have to be on different systems. requirement one primary function per server. In addition the auditor has also stipulated that there be a NTP server, a patch server, true also. ... snip ... Thanks for your input on each points in OP. I appreciate it. Usually you also need to implement WAF (web application firewall) on front of public webservers. I think cheapest solution is use mod_security*) on apache and then proxy valid requests to tomcat. *) http://www.modsecurity.org/ -- Eero, RHCE, CISSP ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
What level of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will be encrypted and stored in client's own db. Yup, this is exactly what they don't want people to do and I believe in the future they'll strive for just a handful of processors that will meet there criteria. The client will be hosting it on their own office premise (the physical security aspect is being handled by another vendor). I'm sure I'm talking way over my head at this point but this must be for a fairly large merchant (1M+ transactions yearly). Not quite sure why one wouldn't use one of processors gateway facilities, there's convenient api's that would handle anything to do with cc's and at a small fraction of the price to set up and maintain. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PCI/DSS compliance on CentOS
2012/5/26 Ken godee k...@perfect-image.com: What level of PCI/DSS compliance are you going for? I have to check this with the client. Credit card information will be encrypted and stored in client's own db. Yup, this is exactly what they don't want people to do and I believe in the future they'll strive for just a handful of processors that will meet there criteria. The client will be hosting it on their own office premise (the physical security aspect is being handled by another vendor). I'm sure I'm talking way over my head at this point but this must be for a fairly large merchant (1M+ transactions yearly). The client will be hosting it on their own office premise sounds really bad. Usually this kind of systems are located in really secured datacenters. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
