Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
Bob Hepple writes: > epdview is another - rpm is 416642 bytes ugh! I should have said 'epdfview' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 02:12:19AM +, Bob Hepple wrote: > writes: > > > > > Dan Hyatt wrote: > > > Any suggestions for a good lightweight pdf reader for my centos servers? > > > > > evince, that I think is installed by default? > > > > Oh, and here's a neat one that's *not* a lightweight reader, that my > > manager introduced me to last year: xournal. It lets you *edit* .pdfs, > > including the ones that don't intend for you to edit them. It was *really* > > nice to have that when we did our (US) state taxes - the federal forms are > > editable, but not the state, except I could with xournal. > > > > mark > > Both xpdf and mupdf are pretty lightweight. EPEL has xpdf, I think I had to build mupdf from source, or else used a Fedora 13 rpm. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
On Jun 19, 2014 10:12 PM, "Bob Hepple" wrote: > > writes: > > > > > Dan Hyatt wrote: > > > Any suggestions for a good lightweight pdf reader for my centos servers? > > > > > evince, that I think is installed by default? > > > > Oh, and here's a neat one that's *not* a lightweight reader, that my > > manager introduced me to last year: xournal. It lets you *edit* .pdfs, > > including the ones that don't intend for you to edit them. It was *really* > > nice to have that when we did our (US) state taxes - the federal forms are > > editable, but not the state, except I could with xournal. > > > > mark > > > > Nice find - but it lacks a 'Find' function unless I'm going blind. > > okular is another KDE one that I like - rpm is 703186 bytes > > epdview is another - rpm is 416642 bytes > > > Bob I don't think that the rpm size has much to do with a lightweight process. Shared libs, bad programming, ... can all easily cause a small rpm to cause more disk space, memory and CPU usage than a larger one. If I have to do something remotely or just want a quick glance at something, I still use xpdf. Old interface but just like vi, once you got used to it, it's just quicker and easier than most modern alternatives. Peter. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
writes: > > Dan Hyatt wrote: > > Any suggestions for a good lightweight pdf reader for my centos servers? > > > evince, that I think is installed by default? > > Oh, and here's a neat one that's *not* a lightweight reader, that my > manager introduced me to last year: xournal. It lets you *edit* .pdfs, > including the ones that don't intend for you to edit them. It was *really* > nice to have that when we did our (US) state taxes - the federal forms are > editable, but not the state, except I could with xournal. > > mark > Nice find - but it lacks a 'Find' function unless I'm going blind. okular is another KDE one that I like - rpm is 703186 bytes epdview is another - rpm is 416642 bytes Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
On 06/20/2014 10:25 AM, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 16:51 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Oh, and here's a neat one that's *not* a lightweight reader, that my manager introduced me to last year: xournal. It lets you *edit* .pdfs, including the ones that don't intend for you to edit them. Brilliant discovery. Its part of KDE. Thanks a lot :-) +1 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 16:51 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Oh, and here's a neat one that's *not* a lightweight reader, that my > manager introduced me to last year: xournal. It lets you *edit* .pdfs, > including the ones that don't intend for you to edit them. Brilliant discovery. Its part of KDE. Thanks a lot :-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
Dan Hyatt wrote: > Any suggestions for a good lightweight pdf reader for my centos servers? > evince, that I think is installed by default? Oh, and here's a neat one that's *not* a lightweight reader, that my manager introduced me to last year: xournal. It lets you *edit* .pdfs, including the ones that don't intend for you to edit them. It was *really* nice to have that when we did our (US) state taxes - the federal forms are editable, but not the state, except I could with xournal. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] good thin client PDF reader for centos 6.4
Any suggestions for a good lightweight pdf reader for my centos servers? Thanks, -- Dan Hyatt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird bug, anyone else have seen it?
On 06/19/2014 02:38 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > This is defiantly a problem in EL6. I looked in gvfs and there is no > said fix that I can find. It seems someone patched it, but it has not > made it into the distro yet. Red Hat could do that for an individual > customer as part of a support case. So an upstream bug on the Red Hat > bugzilla could help. I am looking for the patch.. I will post on it in the thunderbird bugzilla as a starter. Eliezer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] problem with centos.org whois
All, Most of the mirrors are up but still getting 404 errors: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/updates/x86_64/repodata/8e04fc7b4b698edbe493991af8836cfa80b42c9ed80a864f94947b7adb67158c-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" Trying other mirror. Error: failure: repodata/8e04fc7b4b698edbe493991af8836cfa80b42c9ed80a864f94947b7adb67158c-primary.sqlite.bz2 from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Thanks, Brad On 06/18/2014 07:16 AM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 6/17/2014 9:36 PM, Devin Reade wrote: >>> It looks like someone pooched a domain transfer, and the whois >>> entry for centos.org is missing its NS records. I've sent an >>> email to the whois tech contact @redhat, but I'm sending this >>> to the list to hopefully bring it to someone else's attention, >>> as well. >>> >>> Hopefully it gets gets out before my mailserver expires its >>> DNS cache for centos.org. >>> >>> Expect centos.org to be offline for a bit ... >> >> oh, effin' great. >> >> # host -t NS centos.org centos.org has no NS record > > Looks OK from here. Must be fixed. > > (bugs pts2) # whois centos.org ... Tech > Email:domainad...@redhat.com Name Server:NS1.CENTOS.ORG Name > Server:NS3.CENTOS.ORG Name Server:NS4.CENTOS.ORG ... (bugs pts2) # > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird bug, anyone else have seen it?
On 06/15/2014 05:33 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541130 > > The bug I see is using thunderbird 24.6 which is the latest update on > centos 6.5. > The issue is that every time I open an email with some "+" somewhere in > the source (which I didn't traced yet) I get annoying message: > An error occurred while loading or saving configuration information for > thunderbird. Some of your configuration settings may not work properly. > =In the details section I get: > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+CAMELLIA/command": `+' is an invalid > character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+CAMELLIA/command": `+' is an invalid > character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+aRSA/command": `+' is an invalid > character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+aRSA/command": `+' is an invalid > character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM/command": `+' is an > invalid character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM/command": `+' is an > invalid character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA384/command": `+' is an > invalid character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA384/command": `+' is an > invalid character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA256/command": `+' is an > invalid character in key/directory names > Bad key or directory name: > "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA256/command": `+' is an > invalid character in key/directory names > ##end > > By the last message of the bug-report I understand that RH released a > bug-fix\patch that should help with the issue. > > Before I file a bug, anyone else is having the same issue? anyone has > the patch from the bug-report This is defiantly a problem in EL6. I looked in gvfs and there is no said fix that I can find. It seems someone patched it, but it has not made it into the distro yet. Red Hat could do that for an individual customer as part of a support case. So an upstream bug on the Red Hat bugzilla could help. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] compiling centos 6.5 linux-2.6.32-431.el6-kernel
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 19/06/14 05:57, Dilip Basavaraju wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I have compiled the linux-2.6.32-431.el6-kernel with the >> following steps >> >> 1.Make mproper >> >> 2.Make menuconfig >> >> 3.Make >> >> 4.Make modules >> >> 5.Make modules_install >> The compilation is successful but there is a huge change in the size of the >> .ko generated compared to original .ko from the rpm. >> >> Please suggest the steps to compile the centos linux-2.6.32-431.el6-kernel >> and use the modules and to build the kernel.rpm >> > > It's extremely well documented in the 3 kernel articles on the Wiki: > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-c4dbf9ecb355694c78175c7eaad46a2472a3849b And as to the size of the modules being big, this blog explains it all: http://blog.toracat.org/2009/03/strip-it-but-not-all-of-it/ Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] compiling centos 6.5 linux-2.6.32-431.el6-kernel
On 19/06/14 05:57, Dilip Basavaraju wrote: > Dear all, > > I have compiled the linux-2.6.32-431.el6-kernel with the > following steps > > 1.Make mproper > > 2.Make menuconfig > > 3.Make > > 4.Make modules > > 5.Make modules_install > The compilation is successful but there is a huge change in the size of the > .ko generated compared to original .ko from the rpm. > > Please suggest the steps to compile the centos linux-2.6.32-431.el6-kernel > and use the modules and to build the kernel.rpm > It's extremely well documented in the 3 kernel articles on the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-c4dbf9ecb355694c78175c7eaad46a2472a3849b ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
