[CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1193 Important CentOS 5 axis Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1193 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1193.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
2e346500c34aaf601a265f623f2723eeb9babad2d0300f50fdeda441b275efe3
axis-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.i386.rpm
28164c6748741d80bc7fd9d486a1c0597a8d513c55020ef50eb0c9ad4a1fe3e1
axis-javadoc-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.i386.rpm
338bac2f6a89ffe5bb56deb1cea645bea6dc4ed177787977c4b1373666d3ebc8
axis-manual-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
23a6215f6454d1612f3ad4c11e2d035644217358494917d704cdbef0c0ec56ac
axis-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
8420cc89cfadea3b88189d3b1419cc8b1618480322e8267406f9fb26a750d852
axis-javadoc-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
85a3d2dc7efc057133d21fafb628e8922f2255ff6d35bcd250b0bbc221cdfa26
axis-manual-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
9750619e189b580bc485f2858f8036b5e7bf073c3ad3679b6b1becd0d3abde4c
axis-1.2.1-2jpp.8.el5_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] What are these directories on virtio-win-0.1-81.iso?
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:46 AM, ToddAndMargo toddandma...@zoho.com wrote: Hi All I just downloaded virtio-win-0.1-81.iso from http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/WindowsGuestDrivers/Download_Drivers Have you tried asking on one of the lists mentioned on that website? -George ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] What are these directories on virtio-win-0.1-81.iso?
On 09/15/2014 03:34 AM, George Dunlap wrote: On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 5:46 AM, ToddAndMargo toddandma...@zoho.com wrote: Hi All I just downloaded virtio-win-0.1-81.iso from http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/WindowsGuestDrivers/Download_Drivers Have you tried asking on one of the lists mentioned on that website? -George Hi George, I did ask the guys over on the Spice mailing list. The answer came back: WLH is short for Windows Longhorn which is was the code name for Windows Vista and server 2008 WNET is for Windows.net which was Windows 2003 XP ands WXP are just a messy way of stating XP Sorry I forgot to get back. -T ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] clipboard
On 09/12/2014 09:18 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, How do you enable copy and paste from a Windows VM to the host Linux machine? Many thanks, -T The guys over on the Spice list told me what I was doing wrong: the clipboard only works from the Spice client, not the virt-manager viewer. I had forgotten why I was using Spice. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
Maybe you can tune ZFS further, but I tried it in userspace (with FUSE) and reading was a almost 5 times slower than MDADM. That alone is meaningless. MDADM with which filesystem? Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SAMBA as AD DC
Hi Miguel, Miguel Medalha wrote: Anyway, Sernet also provides a source rpm. Why not build up from that base? CentOS 7 is using systemd - that would cause problems. And anyway, I've used the package samba from CentOS-7 as base. This way, incmpatibilites with base samba4 are minimized (same paths etc.). I've already written in this thread: It has turned out that selinux is the problem - turning off selinux helps.. But that is not really what you want to...And since the problem is selinux, I am not sure if Sernet's source would have anything changed. Anyway, I do not think that my package is broken anymore since selinux configuration is a different thing. Greetings Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On 2014-09-15, Chris chris2...@postbox.xyz wrote: On 09/08/2014 09:00 PM, Andrew Holway wrote: Try ZFS http://zfsonlinux.org/ Maybe you can tune ZFS further, but I tried it in userspace (with FUSE) and reading was a almost 5 times slower than MDADM. Just running ZFS in the kernel is going to be a lot faster than running it under FUSE. You should try it in kernel space before making any final decisions. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
Maybe you can tune ZFS further, but I tried it in userspace (with FUSE) and reading was a almost 5 times slower than MDADM. ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'. Lustre is used in the majority of the worlds supercomputers as the primary filesystem (When you gotta have 2TB/s of IO over 100PB then Lustre is pretty much the only viable opensource option) To set expectation. Actually, the most recent release (0.63) of ZFS on Linux is not that quick. In certain circumstances is actually quite bad. This is almost by design as the developers of ZFS have been focussing on stability and have pretty much ignored enhancing performance. This will change in the near future. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Installation of WPS
Hi, i tried to install WPS as alternative to Openffice but it give me this error below. Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.14) Kindly advice. Regards Samson. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] unsubscribe
help
-Original Message-
From: centos-requ...@centos.org
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 1:00 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 116, Issue 13
Send CentOS mailing list submissions to
centos@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 9
(centos-announce-requ...@centos.org)
2. CentOS 7 for i686 (Jatin Davey)
3. nouveau crash on centos 6.5 (Jan Taylor)
4. Re: nouveau crash on centos 6.5 (zep)
5. Re: nouveau crash on centos 6.5 (Lewis, Stephen)
6. Re: ink (Valeri Galtsev)
7. Re: nouveau crash on centos 6.5 (Scott Robbins)
8. Re: CentOS 7 for i686 (Brian Miller)
9. Re: nouveau crash on centos 6.5 (Valeri Galtsev)
10. Re: CentOS 7 for i686 (Alain P?an)
11. Centos-7 XFCE - (Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA)
12. Re: CentOS 7 for i686 (Leon Fauster)
13. Re: ink (Mauricio Tavares)
14. Re: Centos-7 XFCE - (Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA)
15. Re: ink (Frank Cox)
16. Re: Centos-7 XFCE - (Frank Cox)
17. Re: ink (m.r...@5-cent.us)
18. Re: Centos-7 XFCE - (Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA)
19. Re: Centos-7 XFCE - (SilverTip257)
20. Re: Centos-7 XFCE - (Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA)
21. Re: ink (Valeri Galtsev)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:00:02 +
From: centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 9
Message-ID: mailman.7.1410523202.30095.centos-annou...@centos.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2014:1181 CentOS 7 memtest86+ FASTTRACK BugFix Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2014:1180 CentOS 7 openjpeg FASTTRACK BugFix Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CEBA-2014:1182 CentOS 7 compat-db FASTTRACK BugFix Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:56:01 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1181 CentOS 7 memtest86+
FASTTRACK BugFix Update
Message-ID: 20140911135601.ga12...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1181
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1181.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
e4465a67aa61d2a875c1a45654e918ec403a1c7a3d346c18e6a99d127a93d064
memtest86+-4.20-14.el7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
cafb6040047e68991830c23e659d5530dec56ed37f377a146eaf7affb08e6eef
memtest86+-4.20-14.el7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:57:51 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1180 CentOS 7 openjpeg FASTTRACK
BugFix Update
Message-ID: 20140911135751.ga12...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1180
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1180.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
1e744e927c9d7d844d89aae17ac3776250a182f31be987cd7c2b1cdd14c1e6a9
openjpeg-1.5.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm
ffa1a0070c689ee38529d8d0c0ec24d4e59c81eb9c4a992b5345637c594cf02d
openjpeg-devel-1.5.1-10.el7.i686.rpm
78d0e8bc1321cf671a23f7996aa23e540dfbc3bb0008b71bd6ffae3e8fe0a7bb
openjpeg-devel-1.5.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm
75faabb15a294fc03929af10e9557739ece14c9d64e15f2d05ee0e3c0d02052c
openjpeg-libs-1.5.1-10.el7.i686.rpm
4098e5c1f11732d37edde0402964e34510a8364c54a78fcee16058239c60841c
openjpeg-libs-1.5.1-10.el7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e108feace0e22fad3ef8f08c14502cf074fbff08f38833e1fe49a1a5b59d0510
openjpeg-1.5.1-10.el7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 11 Sep
[CentOS] Changes in repositories
Dear All, when looking at http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I notice that adobe-Linux repo is no longer listed. If it no longer exists or it's not recommended, then what is now the best way to install flash? Since rpmforge is now in the known problem repositories. Greetings, J. -- Johan Vermeulen IT-medewerker Caw De Kempen johan.vermeu...@cawdekempen.be 0479.82.01.41 Powered by Linux. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2014:1189 CentOS 6 net-snmp BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:59:31 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1189 CentOS 6 net-snmp BugFix
Update
Message-ID: 20140915105931.ga31...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1189
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1189.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
9648554473367067552d2a6e76f22d757b974b8b7716c4267531794f517f8e9f
net-snmp-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
3435b0620e7cc80979ae2bf7da3c955b6d6c9fc699d49aaa54e9855f071d129e
net-snmp-devel-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
6220ef9d59a9bb759e78dda48df730eb2161741d3aaeb8211a4accfd7068c2ef
net-snmp-libs-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
61beabae2c5b2382e90530948c80459a2fdd7e3d8131696563ddcafe57771219
net-snmp-perl-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
57905b7434f7e87fdcaef541cc10ce91ef19579a4f451e7685a00706f0491756
net-snmp-python-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
66636832abde024310ba053f6b34c96b1f97a0ab9cb6c5f04365053287eafef1
net-snmp-utils-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
x86_64:
f9f2b222bc3f96777bdd088f47953a2a4b4f9fc7babc5826c2f0906a22030153
net-snmp-5.5-49.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
3435b0620e7cc80979ae2bf7da3c955b6d6c9fc699d49aaa54e9855f071d129e
net-snmp-devel-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
5d609dc9e3145e76d6f9c7cf0ed82ee967b3cf2dbd119234d4b09e3bb7e8aa61
net-snmp-devel-5.5-49.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
6220ef9d59a9bb759e78dda48df730eb2161741d3aaeb8211a4accfd7068c2ef
net-snmp-libs-5.5-49.el6_5.3.i686.rpm
25d19586e3f186dfe35900cefb406733946b700f1a8998e86d0f74e2cfeb8f2e
net-snmp-libs-5.5-49.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
10784f874bc8644c1d95ff782625ae6e80c8d23c41c8530ed708c03c15f7c44c
net-snmp-perl-5.5-49.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
08aeb7d053cf0ef802d8f6184f66e0ab3d390518ff5748dfddc6ebf2d6130908
net-snmp-python-5.5-49.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
3d044653d97757432c02fa76591bd8fb4ecb39b92ff9a54e5067fca570aa0cc9
net-snmp-utils-5.5-49.el6_5.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
a54575e57aac919c8bdc18d2e4790fbf745709adb198c68f5c4034f5f55fc18f
net-snmp-5.5-49.el6_5.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 115, Issue 10
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] default devtools enabled for users
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 06:49:45PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Sep 14, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote: Hi! I want to make the default environment for users the environment of devtoolset .. and i am thinking to do it this way: 1. make /bin/bash-devtools with the content scl enable devtoolset-2 bash $@ 2. change for the prospective users the shell from /bin/bash to /bin/bash-devtoolset Is this the best way? Do anyone see or know of any pitfalls with this? Hi, I suspect that'll break a couple things. Off the top of my head, you'll need to add it to /etc/shells. You might get more milage out of putting the scl command in an /etc/profile.d/*.sh script. You could put some logic in it so non-root or certain user/groups are the only ones that load it. yymv, but what about an environment-modules scl or devtoolset which will just: #%Module1.0# prepend-pathPATH/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/bin prepend-pathPATH/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/sbin prepend-pathPATH/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/bin prepend-pathPATH/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/sbin prepend-pathMANPATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/share/man prepend-path -d CFLAGS -I/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/include prepend-path -d CPPFLAGS -I/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/include prepend-path -d CXXFLAGS -I/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/include prepend-path -d LDFLAGS -L/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib prepend-pathLD_RUN_PATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib prepend-pathLD_LIBRARY_PATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib prepend-path -d LDFLAGS -L/opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib64 prepend-pathLD_RUN_PATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib64 prepend-pathLD_LIBRARY_PATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib64 prepend-path PERL5LIB /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root//usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl prepend-path PERL5LIB /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root//usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl prepend-path PERL5LIB /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root//usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl prepend-path PYTHONPATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages prepend-path PYTHONPATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages prepend-path INFOPATH /opt/rh/devtoolset-2/root/usr/share/info Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgptWikcYvjHA.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installation of WPS
On 15 September 2014 @08:14 zulu, Samson wrote: Hi, i tried to install WPS as alternative to Openffice but it give me this error below. Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.14) That's the same library that prevents Chrome 28 and newer from installing in C6.x (though you failed to mention what version of CentOS you're using)... Richard Lloyd engineered a script to install newer libraries from a fedora 15 repo (and f17, now... apparently for C7) into a segregated tree to make Chrome work. You can find that script at http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/ if you'd like to attempt the same thing for WPS. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nouveau crash on centos 6.5
On Sun, September 14, 2014 10:40 pm, Chris wrote: On 09/15/2014 04:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I myself am using ATI usually (even after they were bought out by AMD). I used to use ATI. Accidentally, the last computers I bought had a NVIDIA card. I heard Linux support of both boards would be similar. Not quite so. Example: ATI card, 2 monitors with _different_ resolution, CentOS 6. Nouveau video driver (which in fact is wrapper using open source drivers) works perfectly: no need for sysadmin to gig into X11 manual configuration. The same: 2 monitors with _different_ resolution; NVIDIA card. No way! As open source driver can not handle this in nvidia case (details about how video RAM is laid out was never disclosed by NVIDIA). So you are stuck with proprietary binary NVIDIA driver in this case. More knowledgeable people will correct me. This situation (two monitors with different resolution) is quite often for me: when graduate students leave the Department, students who are still here can use their monitors as second monitor... Thanks. Valeri When I bought a new notebook, I tested it with a live linux CD at the shop. I didn't want to compare all hardware components with internet lists and search for drivers. Graphics worked, WIFI also out of the box! My desktop is a Dell machine. Linux support is flawless. Later I read in a computer magazine, that there are Dell machines where you hardly get the right drivers. That's why I wouldn't order a machine by mail-order anymore. Linux isn't supported by Dell, they recommend Windows, at least in Germany. Usually Dell workstations (Desktops actually) have ATI card as one of choices. These cards are good ones, with discrete video memory (to the contrary to some video chips with shared memory, and yes, there are ATI videochips like with shared memory found in some laptops). Oh, shared memory! That's a good aspect. These ones always sets me off: video chips with fake non existent video memory; fake RAID card that are not capable to do even modulus 2 sum... Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nouveau crash on centos 6.5
Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Sun, September 14, 2014 10:40 pm, Chris wrote: On 09/15/2014 04:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I myself am using ATI usually (even after they were bought out by AMD). I used to use ATI. Accidentally, the last computers I bought had a NVIDIA card. I heard Linux support of both boards would be similar. Not quite so. Example: ATI card, 2 monitors with _different_ resolution, CentOS 6. Nouveau video driver (which in fact is wrapper using open source drivers) works perfectly: no need for sysadmin to gig into X11 manual configuration. snip Um, I'm a tad confused here - so far as I know, nouveau is *only* the driver for NVidia cards, *not* for ATI. Note, also, that I've never managed to spend the time to get nouveau to support twin monitors; I use either kmod-nvidia, or d/l the proprietary ones from NVidia, which work just fine. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] unsubscribe
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Web Master webmas...@age-concern-cardiff.org.uk wrote: help Please visit the URL as pasted below (shows up in the footer of every mailing list message). Heck, instructions are also at the top of the message you apparently did not read closely. You sent your help help help message to the wrong email address if that's what you were trying to do. :-( CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -Original Message- From: centos-requ...@centos.org Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 1:00 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 116, Issue 13 Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS digest... ...snipped... End of CentOS Digest, Vol 116, Issue 13 *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ifconfig ipv6:permission denied.
On 09/11/14 13:54, James Hogarth wrote: On 11 September 2014 05:30, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote: ifcfg enp0s3 add fc00::1002/124 results in arping: Unknown host fc00:1002 Error: some host already uses address fc00:1002 on enp0s3. You know the last error message sounds ridiculous. The virtual interface on the host has IP fc00::1001/124 Using ip, it also complains RTNETLINK answer: Permission denied. Since this's a fresh install, I think I should file a bug. Um ifcfg doesn't handle ipv6 - just take a look at the shell script that makes it up ... This is highlighted by arping ... ipv6 does not use arp I just built a minimal C7 instance to verify the behaviour... systemctl status NetworkManager shows that it is running ip addr add fc00::1001/124 dev eth0 adds the IP address to the interface NetworkManager does not remove this from the interface ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Minimal CentOS does not have NetworkManager. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On 9/15/2014 01:37, Andrew Holway wrote: To set expectation. Actually, the most recent release (0.63) of ZFS on Linux is not that quick. Compared to what? To ZFS on Solaris, ZFS on FreeBSD, or ext4 on Linux? Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like fully-checksummed data (not just metadata) and redundant copies. ZFS will always be slower than filesystems without these features. TANSTAAFL. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ifconfig ipv6:permission denied.
On 15 Sep 2014 18:12, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote: Minimal CentOS does not have NetworkManager. *blink* I built a minimal (just the minimal package group) CentOS 7 to test this just for you and I assure you NetworkManager was there. C6 did not have it in minimal but C7 does. Read the comps file if you want: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/repodata/2bc0054a9f0f4cd3d2806d983edbe3d0dfc484d9f275d12be79eb67a040ba942-c7-x86_64-comps.xml @core is the only group in the grouplist for the minimal environment and has NetworkManager in the default set. If you do a minimal C7 install it includes NM unless you take steps not to have it there such as a kickstart with -NetworkManager in %packages ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com wrote: ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'. wow, the US government!!. *sarcasm implied* FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com wrote: ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'. wow, the US government!!. *sarcasm implied* Ummm, like you've walked on the moon -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On 09/15/2014 08:18 AM, Miguel Medalha wrote: That alone is meaningless. MDADM with which filesystem? ext4 Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try it. Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace? -- Gruß, Christian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
Les Mikesell wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com wrote: ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'. wow, the US government!!. *sarcasm implied* Ummm, like you've walked on the moon We'll just ignore the trivial detail that this conversation is taking place over the Internet, invented for DARPA (US gov't) mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Ummm, like you've walked on the moon LOL. I will begin saying that the US government backs JavaFX then, just because NASA uses it in some projects. https://weblogs.java.net/blog/seanmiphillips/archive/2013/11/20/visualizing-nasa-ground-system-data-products-using-javafx-and-netbeans-platform-part-2 There´s a difference between a govt organization vs the US government as a whole. FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris chris2...@postbox.xyz wrote: Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace? I believe there´s two separate efforts to run ZFS on Linux. One uses FUSE, the other reimplemented ZFS as a loadable kernel module. FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote: Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try it. There´s a copy-on-write file system in the GPL Linux kernel, merged into the mainline Linux kernel in January 2009. http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?14799-Btrfs-Merged-Into-Mainline-Linux-Kernel It´s called BTRFS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxWuaozpe2I It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others. http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/systems-management/677226-suse-linux-says-btrfs-is-ready-to-rock http://hardware-beta.slashdot.org/story/14/03/19/2125243/opensuse-132-to-use-btrfs-by-default RAID 5/6 code has been added to the exp. branch http://www.linuxtoday.com/high_performance/raid-56-code-merged-into-btrfs.html Of course, you are free to use third party loadable kernel modules for whatever other FS you want... Just my $0.02 FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:29:31PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris chris2...@postbox.xyz wrote: Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace? I believe there´s two separate efforts to run ZFS on Linux. One uses FUSE, the other reimplemented ZFS as a loadable kernel module. FC Correct. The ZoL effort does not involve FUSE at all. Quite easy to install via yum as well (after pointing at the ZoL repos): http://zfsonlinux.org/epel.html With that said: http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#PerformanceConsideration Have been running it at $DAYJOB and it's been quite stable. Can't really speak to performance, but haven't had complaints after moving workflows (which are admittedly not super heavy workloads) from HW RAID+LVM to it. YMMV. Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote: It´s called BTRFS. It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others. Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ??? Steve___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
2014-09-15 22:51 GMT+03:00 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote: It´s called BTRFS. It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others. Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ??? zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production ready ? Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On 9/15/2014 13:58, Eero Volotinen wrote: zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production ready ? https://clusterhq.com/blog/state-zfs-on-linux/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
Steve Thompson wrote: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote: It´s called BTRFS. It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others. Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ??? Hey, selinux is ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
Eero Volotinen wrote: 2014-09-15 22:51 GMT+03:00 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Fernando Cassia wrote: It´s called BTRFS. It´s supported by SUSE, Fujitsu, Oracle, among others. Yeah, but is it supported by the *US Government* ??? zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production ready ? My feelings exactly. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like fully-checksummed data (not just metadata) and redundant copies. ZFS will always be slower than filesystems without these features. TANSTAAFL. Not really true. It hugely depends on your workload. For example, if you have a 20TB filesystem with 128GB of ARC (adaptive replacement cache) then ZFS will be many many times faster then ext4 assuming that the hot data is under 128GB as all reads will come from memory or a dedicated cache SSD. If however you are streaming the whole 20TB from the filesystem then the cache makes no difference and you just see the performance of the disks. The checksumming for example does not typically add a performance penalty as this calculation is done in parallel to normal disk operations. The atomistic write mechanism of ZFS can be hundreds of times faster than EXT in cases where your IO is random SYNC assuming you have a dedicated ZIL (ZFS intent log) which keeps the journal. Read up on ZFS transaction groups for more details. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On 9/15/2014 14:48, Andrew Holway wrote: Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like fully-checksummed data (not just metadata) and redundant copies. ZFS will always be slower than filesystems without these features. TANSTAAFL. Not really true. It hugely depends on your workload. For example, if you have a 20TB filesystem with 128GB of ARC (adaptive replacement cache) then ZFS will be many many times faster then ext4 assuming that the hot data is under 128GB as all reads will come from memory or a dedicated cache SSD. If however you are streaming the whole 20TB from the filesystem then the cache makes no difference and you just see the performance of the disks. The checksumming for example does not typically add a performance penalty as this calculation is done in parallel to normal disk operations. The SSD and second CPU core are not free. ZFS does more than pretty much every other mainstream filesystem, and hence needs more resources when you use its additional features. My only point is that there are people who will compare a ZFS pool with all the features turned on to a bare-bones ext4 setup, then complain that ZFS is slow. The atomistic write mechanism of ZFS can be hundreds of times faster than EXT in cases where your IO is random SYNC assuming you have a dedicated ZIL (ZFS intent log) which keeps the journal. Read up on ZFS transaction groups for more details. The ZFS is slow crowd generally doesn't care about reliable fsyncs. Hence why most PC OSes lie through their teeth when you tell them to sync a block to disk: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2367378 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
The SSD and second CPU core are not free. Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] wml / centos7
Am 13.09.2014 16:21, schrieb Michael Kress: Hi, anybody got wml running under centos7? Got problems either compiling it or finding an rpm. TIA for any hint! Found a solution: installed centos5, there I got it running. Not the worst thing, it's running on a VM, it's only purpose is to execute wml on a nfs mount from time to time until decommissioned. So thanks for keeping available the old isos! Regards Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, September 15, 2014 4:49 pm, Andrew Holway wrote: The SSD and second CPU core are not free. Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC Is it Salt Lake City that you are from? (that is so reach with Second Level Cache... That is what you actually meant I figure) Am I the only one who is tempted to say: people, could you kindly start deciphering your abbreviations. I know, I know, computed science uses _that_ abbreviation for years. But we definitely have people without computer science degree (not me, I do have one ;-) on the list who will be happier to learn terms and abbreviations if it is mentioned what stands for what. Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Mon, September 15, 2014 4:49 pm, Andrew Holway wrote: The SSD and second CPU core are not free. Where I come from, the streets are paved with SLC Is it Salt Lake City that you are from? (that is so reach with Second Level Cache... That is what you actually meant I figure) Am I the only one who is tempted to say: people, could you kindly start deciphering your abbreviations. I know, I know, computed science uses _that_ abbreviation for years. But we definitely have people without computer science degree (not me, I do have one ;-) on the list who will be happier to learn terms and abbreviations if it is mentioned what stands for what. In defense of the OP (original poster), he mentioned SLC in 1. a throw-away line meant as a joke, 2. the clear context of SSD (solid-state drive(s)), where the distinction between MLC (multi-level cell) and SLC (single-level cell) technology has been widely discussed. In this case, I'd give more weight to point number 1: I'd estimate that 493 out of 500 readers of this list would have immediately grasped he was making a joke. Even if they didn't get the SLC reference, they understood that jokes can be safely ignored without missing any important bits of the discussion. In the case of point #2, I'd say that abuse is definitely in the eye of the beholder. Who is the arbiter of when an acronym is obvious or obscure? I mean that as a serious question. Who gets to say that USB is an acceptable acronym while SLC is not? If you know, how does one become that person? -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS
On 2014-09-15, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 9/15/2014 13:58, Eero Volotinen wrote: zfs release zero dot something does not sound like production ready ? https://clusterhq.com/blog/state-zfs-on-linux/ That's a super (and timely!) post on XFS. I saw in particular this section. Upgrades require that users keep the userland tools and kernel modules in synchronization on ZoL while other Open ZFS platforms manage that for users. We plan to resolve this with /dev/zfs ioctl stabilization. This is the last major missing feature before ZoL moves to 1.0 status. So the ZoL folks want one more feature before calling it 1.0; otherwise they believe it's production ready. Only your own testing can convince you that it's truly production ready. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ifconfig ipv6:permission denied.
On 09/15/14 23:34, James Hogarth wrote: On 15 Sep 2014 18:12, dE de.tec...@gmail.com wrote: Minimal CentOS does not have NetworkManager. *blink* I built a minimal (just the minimal package group) CentOS 7 to test this just for you and I assure you NetworkManager was there. C6 did not have it in minimal but C7 does. Read the comps file if you want: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/repodata/2bc0054a9f0f4cd3d2806d983edbe3d0dfc484d9f275d12be79eb67a040ba942-c7-x86_64-comps.xml @core is the only group in the grouplist for the minimal environment and has NetworkManager in the default set. If you do a minimal C7 install it includes NM unless you take steps not to have it there such as a kickstart with -NetworkManager in %packages ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Yeah, I'll try this again. Thanks for the help. Currently I'm working with CentOS 6.5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] repoquery -f does not work well.
Hi. I've found inconstancy between output of repoquery and rpm. I was looking forward towards apache php 5.4 module which must provided by some package SCL (can someone tell me?). rpm -qf /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 repoquery -qf /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so so repoquery results in no output yum list installed httpd Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * c6-media: Installed Packages httpd.x86_64 2.2.15-29.el6.centos @c6-media repoquery -qa httpd httpd-0:2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 No wonder libphp5.so results in no output. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
