Re: [CentOS] Making custom USB install media
Well I feel like a fool, but I owe you one anyways. As noted in my message, isohybrid was one of the first things I tried, and it seemed to work, but the installer would bail saying can't find file, seemingly referring to the squashfs file. Now I'm pretty sure it was saying it couldn't find my kickstart file. I'd modified the menu to say ks=cdrom:. I restored and tried the default install option, works fine. Setting my ks line to ks=hd:LABEL . . . also works fine. My custom ks and packages and everything work straight from the initial menu. If anyone could fill me in on exactly what that partition structure on the official images is doing though, I'd be curious to know. -Matt On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote: On Jan 13, 2015, at 23:16, Matt wrote: I guess I could phrase my question as "Given that the default image for 6.6 and 7.0 do this, how do I make custom media that does it to?" When I make custom media, it only works off an actual DVD. Have you tried /usr/bin/isohybrid on the ISO file? Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Making custom USB install media
On Jan 13, 2015, at 23:16, Matt wrote: > I guess I could phrase my question as "Given that the default image for 6.6 > and 7.0 do this, how do I make custom media that does it to?" > > When I make custom media, it only works off an actual DVD. Have you tried /usr/bin/isohybrid on the ISO file? Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat Developer Toolset 3 for CentOS6?
Unfortunately, this is only for RHEL/CentOS 7, but it can also be found at: https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/ On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:39 AM, wwp wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:18:27 +0100 wwp wrote: > > > I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid > > of a v3 of the toolset? > > > > I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc > > 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If > > not, the sources will rule. > > > > Any hint? > > The hint often comes after a deeper look on the Internet: > http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/scl/ > (1.1 and 2 are accessible too, but slightly differently) > > Thanks to the Cern, sorry for the noise, at least it serves the > archives. > > > Regards, > > -- > wwp > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Making custom USB install media
Almost. I've read that, and I can get it to work. I guess I could phrase my question as "Given that the default image for 6.6 and 7.0 do this, how do I make custom media that does it to?" When I make custom media, it only works off an actual DVD. I need help making custom media that has that USB/EFI magic in it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server
On 01/13/2015 12:10 PM, Mateusz Guz wrote:
> Have you found a solution?
>
> Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:02 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server
>
> On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
>> I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational.
>> Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the
>> master server when the notify and transfer process happens.
>>
>> The slave DNS server gets the changes to the modified zone, but the slave
>> zone file remains as before. I've found a few tutorials and lots of
>> discussions, many of which talk about the slave's zone file getting written
>> upon transfer, but none mention what configuration option would cause the
>> slave's files to get updated.
>>
>> The master is on a Cantos 6 server and the slave is on a Cantos 7 machine.
>
> does the named service have write access to the slave directory ? chown
> named.named /path-to-named/slave
>
> oh, is your slave chrooted? are you looking in the right directory, eg,
> /var/named/chroot/var/named/slave ?
>
>
I am seeing the following in the log:
Jan 13 12:08:44 g1 named[16370]: 13-Jan-2015 12:08:44.792 general: info: zone
mydomain.com/IN: Transfer started.
Jan 13 12:08:44 g1 named[16370]: 13-Jan-2015 12:08:44.885 xfer-in: info:
transfer of 'mydomain.com/IN' from xx.xx.xxx.xxx#53: connected using
66.208.208.151#40226
Jan 13 12:08:44 g1 named[16370]: 13-Jan-2015 12:08:44.948 general: info: zone
mydomain.com/IN: transferred serial 112
Jan 13 12:08:44 g1 named[16370]: 13-Jan-2015 12:08:44.948 xfer-in: info:
transfer of 'mydomain.com/IN' from xx.xx.xxx.xxx#53: Transfer completed: 1
messages, 38 records, 898 bytes, 0.063 secs (14253 bytes/sec)
Jan 13 12:08:44 g1 named[16370]: 13-Jan-2015 12:08:44.949 notify: info: zone
mydomain.com/IN: sending notifies (serial 112)
Yet the slaves/mydomain.com.db file does not get updated. There must be an
option I am not setting correctly.
Slave config:
Global:
options {
allow-notify { mas.ter.IPa.ddr; };
allow-transfer { mas.ter.IPa.ddr; };
.
.
.
};
Per zone:
zone "mydomain.com." IN {
type slave;
file "slaves/mydomain.com.db";
masters { mas.ter.IPa.ddr; };
};
Master config:
Global:
options {
allow-transfer { sla.ve.IP.net/28; 127.0.0.1; };
also-notify { sla.ve.IPa.ddr; };
allow-update { none; };
notify explicit;
.
.
.
};
I also tried it with allow-update set to slaves IP address, even though I was
sure that option was about dynamic DNS, not zone transfer to a slave. Of
course that didn't work either.
Emmett
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Making custom USB install media
On 01/13/2015 04:01 PM, Matt wrote: <> > Can anyone explain this to me or point me at some documentation? > Am I missing something obvious, like say the old Revisor tool that > I should be using to make my life much easier? > > Any help would be much appreciated, not sure if this is what you are looking for, but from how it reads, and claims, it may. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey under heading; CentOS release 6 (newer than 6.5) and CentOS 7 after red highlighted, there is a statement; "Exactly the same method works for CentOS 7." hth. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Scope of testing done by CentOS Development Team
> Thanks Sven. > You're probably right. I'll move this to the devel list. I've created the following thread on the centos-devel list http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-January/012599.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] When will CentOS Publish Errata?
> I'll move this to the devel list. I've created the following thread. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-January/012600.html Thanks for the discussions so far. I look forward to making more progress on centos-devel. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] When will CentOS Publish Errata?
> PS: I guess this discussion should move to the devel list? I was actually beginning to think the same think. I'll move this to the devel list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Scope of testing done by CentOS Development Team
> First, I guess this question would be more suitable for the devel list than > for the users list, but that's just my opinion :) Thanks Sven. You're probably right. I'll move this to the devel list. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
Just to note: Fedora has been upstream for RHEL for many years. New features are tested in Fedora for a long time before they hit RHEL. For example, systemd was first introduced in Fedora 15 (we are currently at 21). Ample time has been given to discuss, critique, provide feedback and to help shape what ends up in RHEL. If you are running RHEL/CentOS, consider running an instance of Fedora in a VM or testing environment so you get years of warning about new features before they hit RHEL. If you are concerned about what happens to RHEL, get involved: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join. Kal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
On 01/13/2015 04:03 PM, Always Learning wrote: Being in the real world rather than in the hectic and unstable 'change every 6 months Fedora environment', just what are the RHEL/Centos 8 options at this moment? Real users of RHEL/SL/Centos want 1. stability 2. reliability 3. security revisions 4. bug fixes For the love of Pete! If you use RHEL or CentOS, you'll have a stable, reliable operating system with bug and security fixes for upward of 10 years! For free (in the case of CentOS)! Will you give it a rest already? If you can't tolerate moderate changes at a 10 year interval, then there probably isn't any option for you. Ideally, before RH decides to impose an abstract version of Fedora upon the world, RH could ask for comments and give everyone sufficient time to respond. So you want them to do what? 5 years of development and then get your approval on hundreds or thousands of those efforts, and then once they have your approval, another few years of development and testing to make sure that whatever you approve actually works? Oh, and you don't want to pay for it, either. I don't know what world you live in, but economies don't work that way. They never did. Free Software is a participation economy. Your feeling of entitlement to dictate how Fedora, Red Hat, and CentOS function, without contributing any of your own time or money, is shockingly disconnected from reality. Please stop arguing about this. It is annoying. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 14:27 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > I only dragged Merriam-Webster into this to show that third party arbitration > doesn’t help settle the argument. That should tell you that we’re not > dealing with a single universal sense of the word “enterprise”. If we can’t > agree on its meaning, we can’t sensibly argue about how well RHEL adheres to > that meaning. Hallo, hallo, the majority of the world is not the US of A. Our chosen dictionaries are not US of A ones. Probably within the next ten years a Chinese originated version of Linux will supplant many of the US of A versions. No doubt .mil is currently seeking a more secure version of any commercial or free operating system after its publicly embarrassing hacking. The US of A's DoD is never ever going to confess how deep the hackers penetrated. > > This issue…is… > > the path that RHEL seems to be following at the moment > > So get involved with the development of RHEL 8, rather than complain about a > design that started taking shape three years ago, and which is now set in > stone. Being in the real world rather than in the hectic and unstable 'change every 6 months Fedora environment', just what are the RHEL/Centos 8 options at this moment? Real users of RHEL/SL/Centos want 1. stability 2. reliability 3. security revisions 4. bug fixes Many real users lack the time - because time is always finite - to comprehensively monitor the multitude of Fedora lists. Ideally, before RH decides to impose an abstract version of Fedora upon the world, RH could ask for comments and give everyone sufficient time to respond. Bored clever people who never really run anything on a daily basis should remember that if they wish to play games, then Centos is probably not the best Linux. Neither is RHEL/SL. Having a high IQ is never an indication of common, or of any other practical, sense. Progress for progress's sake is not beneficial. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Je suis Charlie. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Making custom USB install media
Hey List, I apologize for how broad this may be, but hopefully someone here can help me out. I need to make custom kickstart installers to be used in the field to install microservers (Intel NUCs, EFI boot) that don't have optical drives and may not have internet connections. I can make a custom ISO just fine using the pretty common steps, specifically following what's here: http://smorgasbork.com/component/content/article/35-linux/151-building-a-custom-centos-7-kickstart-disc-part-1 My custom kickstart is on the disk, and along with all my packages, and everything works great on a VM as a CD image. The problem is I can't get this to install from USB. I can get it to boot from USB using the isohybrid tool, but the installer fails, can't find the squashfs image. I don't think this is the right way to do it. I know the CentOS 7 (and I believe 6.5) images have a "special" EFI partition that I believe is why USB works with the base image. The problem is I can't really find any information on how this works or how to recreate it. When I run fdisk -l on the image (as a loopback device) I see that the main image is on a partition marked as none, and then there's an EFI partition with start and end points actually inside the first partition? I'm afraid I don't really know what this is doing, or how to go about recreating. Can anyone explain this to me or point me at some documentation? Am I missing something obvious, like say the old Revisor tool that I should be using to make my life much easier? Any help would be much appreciated, -Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:15 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Mon, January 12, 2015 11:47, Warren Young wrote: >> On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:42 PM, James B. Byrne >> wrote: >>> On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote: Enterprise to me implies large business >>> >>> Enterprise literally means 'undertaking’. > >> >> Danger: We’re starting to get into dictionary flame territory. > > Is one to infer from that remark that the E in RHEL has no meaning > whatsoever? It has marketing value, and that only because people drag along baggage of what “enterprise” means. Red Hat could rename it Red Hat Spiffy Linux without any obligation to make any functional change in the end product as a result of the name change. That should tell you how much practical value the term has. (Spoiler: zero.) >> Just because the product has an “enterprise” label on it doesn’t mean >> it must behave according to rules set down by Merriam-Webster. > > This is, of which you are no-doubt quite cognisant, a straw-man > augment. Nowhere in this discussion has anyone defined 'rules' or > claimed that rules exist, in Merriam-Wester or elsewhere, in whatever > form you imagine them to take. I only dragged Merriam-Webster into this to show that third party arbitration doesn’t help settle the argument. That should tell you that we’re not dealing with a single universal sense of the word “enterprise”. If we can’t agree on its meaning, we can’t sensibly argue about how well RHEL adheres to that meaning. > This issue…is… > the path that RHEL seems to be following at the moment So get involved with the development of RHEL 8, rather than complain about a design that started taking shape three years ago, and which is now set in stone. > This forum is > where I find those who share my interest in RHEL, albeit in the form > of CentOS. I am seeking their views on the matter. I do not expect a > solution here. Nor would I look for one on any of the multitudinous > mailing lists associated with Fedora. If you don’t expect a solution, what *do* you expect to get out of this? What's the motivating drive that keeps you posting to this thread? Catharsis? I’d hoped we’d passed that point months ago. Agitation for rebellion? The only argument that’s going to matter is for someone to develop a viable alternative. Fork EL6, for example. Bikeshedding? I think we can all agree that the current bike shed is ugly, but that it keeps the rust off. Soapboxing? Leverage is more about position than force. The same amount of effort applied elsewhere would have a greater effect. My reason? https://xkcd.com/386/ > we need to be looking now for a replacement. No, you need to be helping develop that replacement now. Seriously: Look at all the Linuxes out there, decide whether EL7 is still the best *on balance*, and if so, decide whether it’s best to get involved with Fedora.next so as to drive EL8, or fork it now to create what you actually want instead. If some other Linux is better, the same argument applies. You’re not going to find “perfect.” All you’re going to find is the platform you think you’ve got the best chance of being successful atop. Free software is about freedom, and freedom isn’t free. Like a democracy, those who just complain about change after it’s been made don’t actually affect anything. It’s those who get up and push out the *next* change who affect where the passive observers go. >> Please point to an example of an OS or OS-like software distribution >> that does this. > > Why is that necessary? Because you agitators are all saying “just” do this, and “just” do that, and why can’t it be different? I am challenging you to show me a system that has done “just” those things, and succeeded. If there are no such systems, there’s probably a good reason for that, given that we do not lack for choice in the Linux world. DistroWatch returns 49 results for “server Linux”. (http://goo.gl/Hrto3R) If you drop the Linux requirement, you add another eight options. If it’s easy, why doesn’t your nirvana distro already exist? It’s because it *isn’t* easy. It’s actually work. Lots of it. Go ask Patrick Volkerding how much work it is to create a *successful* Linux distro that works differently from all the others. > As it happens a most useful, to me at least, piece of information was > revealed in the course of this thread. That was the existence of a > server based stream for Fedora. I have downloaded that ISO and intend > to install it on a VM in the near future. If the results of that > investigation prove satisfactory then that will go a long way to > alleviating the doubts that my, admittedly limited, experience with > CentOS-7 has engendered thus far. I think you’re going to find that it breaks things frequently, as is appropriate for a distro project that puts out a new version every 6 months. The point of running Fedora Server (or whatever they’re calling it) is to
Re: [CentOS] DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue
On 01/13/2015 08:53 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > Hello all, > > We have put a DNS server online running DJBDNS v1.06 > (ndjbdns-1.06-1.el6.x86_64) on a 64-bit CentOS 6.6 server. We have done > some limited testing on the machine which it passed - i.e., dnscache was > talking to tinydns, the queries went through fine, etc. > > As soon as we put it online subjecting it to live load the following > happened: > > 1) Within a short time period (about a minute) the dnscache process reached > the CPU utilisation level of 100%. > > 2) The process would then die reporting the following message to the log: > > dnscache: BUG: out of in progress slots > > NOTE: Random sampling indicates that at no point sampled did the load > exceed 200 requests per second. In tests conducted earlier the DNS server > successfully demonstrated speeds in tens of thousands of requests per > second. > > We then proceeded to edit the following parameters in the dnscache.conf as > they seemed to be the only ones that seemed relevant: DATALIMIT and > CACHESIZE. They are described as limints (in bytes) on the total data > memory allocation and cache, default values are 8000 and 5000 > respectively. > > Playing with these demonstrated some highly counterintuitive results: > > 1) Setting the values lower (say, an order of magnitude lower) made the > dnscache process run longer. > > 2) Shortening the relative gap between the two values (for instance, > setting DATALIMIT at 52000 and CACHE at 5) made it run for about an > hour vs about 1 minute, load seeming to be about the same. > > 3) Running it with DATALIMIT not set was possible though it eventually > failed anyways. > > 4) Running it with CACHESIZE not set was not possible at all. > > So the issue is currently still not resolved and we are stuck. > > Any advice will be much appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Boris. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Powerdns is supposed to have excellent performance and supports both a caching configuration and a database backend. Nataraj ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
For those who want to track what is going on in Fedora, http:// fedoramagazine.org/ highlights of discussions on the "multitudinous" mailing lists, forums, meetings, etc. For those interested in Fedora Server, its goals, and the people working on it, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server seems a good place to start, in particular, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Product_Requirements_Document. This is still a very new project : if you want to help shape what happens in the future, get involved. Kal -- Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server
Have you found a solution? Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:02 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote: > I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational. > Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the > master server when the notify and transfer process happens. > > The slave DNS server gets the changes to the modified zone, but the slave > zone file remains as before. I've found a few tutorials and lots of > discussions, many of which talk about the slave's zone file getting written > upon transfer, but none mention what configuration option would cause the > slave's files to get updated. > > The master is on a Cantos 6 server and the slave is on a Cantos 7 machine. does the named service have write access to the slave directory ? chown named.named /path-to-named/slave oh, is your slave chrooted? are you looking in the right directory, eg, /var/named/chroot/var/named/slave ? -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue
Use BIND. How the times have changed. :-) PS: I'm also curious for a solution.. for when djbnostalgia hits me. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Boris Epstein" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 15:53:28 > Subject: [CentOS] DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue > Hello all, > > We have put a DNS server online running DJBDNS v1.06 > (ndjbdns-1.06-1.el6.x86_64) on a 64-bit CentOS 6.6 server. We have done > some limited testing on the machine which it passed - i.e., dnscache was > talking to tinydns, the queries went through fine, etc. > > As soon as we put it online subjecting it to live load the following > happened: > > 1) Within a short time period (about a minute) the dnscache process reached > the CPU utilisation level of 100%. > > 2) The process would then die reporting the following message to the log: > > dnscache: BUG: out of in progress slots > > NOTE: Random sampling indicates that at no point sampled did the load > exceed 200 requests per second. In tests conducted earlier the DNS server > successfully demonstrated speeds in tens of thousands of requests per > second. > > We then proceeded to edit the following parameters in the dnscache.conf as > they seemed to be the only ones that seemed relevant: DATALIMIT and > CACHESIZE. They are described as limints (in bytes) on the total data > memory allocation and cache, default values are 8000 and 5000 > respectively. > > Playing with these demonstrated some highly counterintuitive results: > > 1) Setting the values lower (say, an order of magnitude lower) made the > dnscache process run longer. > > 2) Shortening the relative gap between the two values (for instance, > setting DATALIMIT at 52000 and CACHE at 5) made it run for about an > hour vs about 1 minute, load seeming to be about the same. > > 3) Running it with DATALIMIT not set was possible though it eventually > failed anyways. > > 4) Running it with CACHESIZE not set was not possible at all. > > So the issue is currently still not resolved and we are stuck. > > Any advice will be much appreciated. > > Cheers, > > Boris. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 2460x1440 video card recommendation
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > Can someone recommend a video card that's capable of driving a monitor at > 2560x1600 or 2560x1440 and just works with Centos 7 without requiring any > outside video drivers? > > I would prefer to stay with the built-in video drivers that are included > with Centos 7 if possible; I don't play games and such, so I'm not looking > for high performance 3D -- I just want a high resolution desktop. > > I'm currently looking at a BenQ GW2765HT which is 2560x1440, though I > might end up with something else in the end. > Hmmm.. I have dual GeForce 780s (Asus brand) driving 2560x1440 monitors. However, I am using the NVidia binary drivers. The problem with using nouveau is that with that much more real-estate video can bog if you are doing much beyond launching xterms. In particular, full screen video has noticeable tearing and even dragging windows across the desktop looks glitchy. To be clear, it works, just that I hate seeing the visual tearing. On another system I have a Geforce 650. It also drives a single 2560x1440 monitor without issue. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Scope of testing done by CentOS Development Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13.01.2015 05:43, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote: > Hello, > > What types of tests does the CentOS Development Team do for > software in its repositories? Where does it get its test catalog > from? > > I want to create a testing process which is equal to if not more > rigorous that the CentOS process for any third party software we > use. > > For example, if I install the php-mysqlnd package from the Remi > repository, I want to test it just as carefully as the php-mysql > package has been tested before I get it from the CentOS > repository. > > If somebody can point me in the right direction I'd appreciate it. > > Thanks! David First, I guess this question would be more suitable for the devel list than for the users list, but that's just my opinion :) Second: You have to keep in mind that you would want to apply also all upstream tests. This means it would be best to read up on the fedora packaging and testing guidelines. I don't know if red hat has published their intern guidelines for RHEL development (I'm sure there are some). HTH Sven -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJUtV9xAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqlB0wL/0DgaVJNdNmf74+ncW7Jf8Pz X0fkJAUAqKs2iwHMOh3biRVrHZsE2th0v1tYECMcE3LCB3KKYSqIeHYsGwgOstMz hKgiB/kaYl7CRP0vdb/L3rRZpinZTMT2YDVcNynjRvAMa9MYlE0kL4AmwmYBJfP5 e1JYvD5wyXh6RuHo/2zqjUfICjK4Nb37nHhlCqil5KxyNlCg1Feu5VeeyeLw93yO 1G/emtPATVgiMvX1zQqzhBAUMkAMqFAdygaCRLtAMRXSSOmgDo0vOZiGEjqk3kSp llBBAqg6YiJ1Y5FC14cZOxsAd4eHr8G+U6aQz9d/RqXnWI8/EqpIRH7zv3wUAZBz DC4gXnIdi80FvxVw+umtCXbFST4ghNSshFQzOJaivG3fTHABLt7l4Irq10k7N89m eE0VWpO+T5uHGgdgSQS/s9+4NGgrbkN4vjQ+itI81ni77P4cpoKaWL0eeEIXUPiD C/Q3Ly9L0w9l62ymTe6ijyXjQHL7eINszfGyAy6LbA== =9VED -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] When will CentOS Publish Errata?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13.01.2015 04:25, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote: >> On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could properly publish that data in some way. >>> >>> It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an >>> automated account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list: >>> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/enterprise-watch-list >>> >>> or parse the archives here: >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/enterprise-watch-list/ >> >> You could subscribe an address, but based on the link to RH's >> terms that Johnny posted it may still violate the >TOU to >> redistribute the contents of the messages the bot received. > > I heard that this is actually how the RHEL errata have been put > together, and that it would not be a violation of the ToU to use > the info in the emails. > > Can somebody confirm this? > > Sounds to me like this would be the way to go. Well IANAL, but: imho red hats "terms of service" on their website are not valid , at least in germany (where I happen to live). In germany you can not bind someone to some silly "terms of service" by just displaying them on some random website. you need to agree to those tos actively somehow (e.g. signing a contract). but of course this is IANAL, so you should probably contact some lawyer about this. But if I'm right it could at least be possible to create this data in europe. kind regards Sven PS: I guess this discussion should move to the devel list? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJUtV7mAAoJEAq0kGAWDrqlHv8MAJv9ez0FAoiGgbdb9MLwMFQd tnxMJzZ+iJ1Sg+I1n6gt7KkvPee8KvUNddLcIC8e4fIELIdtq/zfgMrSI76V/XAo birVO48LgoO03FYaGFmIqQDwk08gJp/P1IFS1Vq1Do+IReS6zVkc1cnGF6tLeMGQ rqz0tEEE0UrWY6dXGVGQ4cNr2lgOLc3ibgw5d6ak5L90WAOPA4hJvc6zopOC8I3D AsyP/y2ZvVwPr1g5I/SgTroWBZjh6Kso+inSutkr1EmHwUZVDedyIWLnVqIXdOi8 e/Zp8MAekR10ssRKFwQSIsZSwsK+shHSBAspFQ2gmLsY9u7u5zPNFRdinaHRlKp8 dMWniq+h5eoUQ9EWkNjWcg1VSOdS4rAbef03F7dGSIZGa2Cd/6/N+1fgYhpccuL0 MfmzqEACH5sceAHwQH/hpQ7eiKRu5aVU/TT4pXY1MpDO9Kz2twennklyzR/Xx7Xx 9EOLI+vj+LJ311g3zxerY7Fzsxvud+RiOwp7prlFfg== =I/kr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk
On 01/13/2015 12:57 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 01/13/2015 12:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard
drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help.
1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS?
2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT?
3: Is /boot on its own partition?
3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly support, so they're
only really expected to work on a system partitioned with GPT and
Not exactly true - they work fine with an MBR but you can access 2/3 of the
drive.
Also it is not necessary to use UEFI to boot.
You can have a fakeout mbr that is used for a standard bios boot.
# fdisk -l
WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk
doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.
Disk /dev/sda: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 267350 2147483647+ ee GPT
Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Tue Jan 13 12:55:21 EST 2015
P308771:~
# parted -l
Model: ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 3001GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End SizeFile system Name Flags
1 1049kB 2097kB 1049kB bbp bios_grub
2 2097kB 1002MB 1000MB ext3primary
3 1002MB 5002MB 3999MB linux-swap(v1) primary
4 5002MB 3001GB 2996GB ext4primary
In addition this is how we partition our 3TB drives for a bios boot using
parted.
parted -s ${DRIVE} -- mklabel gpt \
mkpart bbp 1MB 2MB \
set 1 bios_grub on \
mkpart primary ext3 2MB 1002MB \
mkpart primary linux-swap 1002MB 5002MB \
mkpart primary ext2 5002MB -1
booting via UEFI. And in that case, /boot and /boot/efi need to be
individual partitions.
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk
On 01/13/2015 12:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. 1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS? 2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT? 3: Is /boot on its own partition? 3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly support, so they're only really expected to work on a system partitioned with GPT and Not exactly true - they work fine with an MBR but you can access 2/3 of the drive. Also it is not necessary to use UEFI to boot. You can have a fakeout mbr that is used for a standard bios boot. # fdisk -l WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted. Disk /dev/sda: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes Disk identifier: 0x Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 267350 2147483647+ ee GPT Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary. Tue Jan 13 12:55:21 EST 2015 P308771:~ # parted -l Model: ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End SizeFile system Name Flags 1 1049kB 2097kB 1049kB bbp bios_grub 2 2097kB 1002MB 1000MB ext3primary 3 1002MB 5002MB 3999MB linux-swap(v1) primary 4 5002MB 3001GB 2996GB ext4primary booting via UEFI. And in that case, /boot and /boot/efi need to be individual partitions. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk
Hi Gordon, On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Gordon Messmer wrote: I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. 1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS? UEFI, 2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT? MBR 3: Is /boot on its own partition? No. 3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly support, so they're only really expected to work on a system partitioned with GPT and booting via UEFI. And in that case, /boot and /boot/efi need to be individual partitions. Ah, OK. Well, I have some work to do this afternoon. Thanks for the very helpful tips! Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk
I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. 1: Is this system booting UEFI or BIOS? 2: Is the disk partitioned with MBR or GPT? 3: Is /boot on its own partition? 3TB drives are larger than MBR and BIOS properly support, so they're only really expected to work on a system partitioned with GPT and booting via UEFI. And in that case, /boot and /boot/efi need to be individual partitions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:40:55AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > As it happens a most useful, to me at least, piece of information was > > revealed in the course of this thread. That was the existence of a > > server based stream for Fedora. > > That's an interesting turn of events, but is this just a separation of > packages or is there really a group in Fedora that actually maintains > large server farms and has an interest in keeping their applications > working? I think they just add some applications and management tools for servers. It's a bit difficult to find out exactly what the differences are supposed to be. https://getfedora.org/en/server/ Somewhat vague though. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question
James B. Byrne wrote: > Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on the > > second machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes that > > there is already an instance running. Rebooting the second machine > > will not help. The quick-and-dirty way around this is to log in as a > > different user (and hence different $HOME) on the second machine. > This firefox invocation inhibits the surprising behavior: firefox -new-instance -no-remote BTW, thanks for the up-thread patch! > You will see the same effect on MicroSoft Domains with users using > roaming profiles. They leave one host with FF open and go to another, > log on and try, vainly, to start FF in the new session. I presume > this has to do with preventing destructive overwrites of the user's > profile but it is annoying. Not a Linux problem though. Best regards, -- Charles ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] DJBDNS: very weird dnscache issue
Hello all, We have put a DNS server online running DJBDNS v1.06 (ndjbdns-1.06-1.el6.x86_64) on a 64-bit CentOS 6.6 server. We have done some limited testing on the machine which it passed - i.e., dnscache was talking to tinydns, the queries went through fine, etc. As soon as we put it online subjecting it to live load the following happened: 1) Within a short time period (about a minute) the dnscache process reached the CPU utilisation level of 100%. 2) The process would then die reporting the following message to the log: dnscache: BUG: out of in progress slots NOTE: Random sampling indicates that at no point sampled did the load exceed 200 requests per second. In tests conducted earlier the DNS server successfully demonstrated speeds in tens of thousands of requests per second. We then proceeded to edit the following parameters in the dnscache.conf as they seemed to be the only ones that seemed relevant: DATALIMIT and CACHESIZE. They are described as limints (in bytes) on the total data memory allocation and cache, default values are 8000 and 5000 respectively. Playing with these demonstrated some highly counterintuitive results: 1) Setting the values lower (say, an order of magnitude lower) made the dnscache process run longer. 2) Shortening the relative gap between the two values (for instance, setting DATALIMIT at 52000 and CACHE at 5) made it run for about an hour vs about 1 minute, load seeming to be about the same. 3) Running it with DATALIMIT not set was possible though it eventually failed anyways. 4) Running it with CACHESIZE not set was not possible at all. So the issue is currently still not resolved and we are stuck. Any advice will be much appreciated. Cheers, Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > Is one to infer from that remark that the E in RHEL has no meaning > whatsoever? And that it should be ignored? Or perhaps redefined to > whatever is convenient for the moment and the POV of the definer? In > which case is it anything more than noise? In any case, the point of > the defining the word was to show that Enterprise != Large, nothing > more. The place where it matters is for companies large enough that they have written their own applications and need a stable OS and library set to run on. Every interface change and install/operating procedure change is going to cost development and training time that would generally be better spent improving your own application. If you just run the applications included in the distribution, it doesn't matter so much since even if the internal interfaces change, they stay consistent within the packages the distribution ships together - that is, someone else has already been forced to deal with the breakage. > In any case, it seems to me that the rather recent innovation of > software collections indicates that perhaps I am not alone in that > observation. And the need for docker as an even more extreme defense against OS/lib instability really points out the problem. > As it happens a most useful, to me at least, piece of information was > revealed in the course of this thread. That was the existence of a > server based stream for Fedora. That's an interesting turn of events, but is this just a separation of packages or is there really a group in Fedora that actually maintains large server farms and has an interest in keeping their applications working? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora
On Mon, January 12, 2015 11:47, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:42 PM, James B. Byrne > wrote: >> On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote: >>> >>> Enterprise to me implies large business >> >> Enterprise literally means 'undertaking. > > Danger: Were starting to get into dictionary flame territory. But > the dictionary says is no substitute for thoughtful consideration, > realpolitik, or empathy. Is one to infer from that remark that the E in RHEL has no meaning whatsoever? And that it should be ignored? Or perhaps redefined to whatever is convenient for the moment and the POV of the definer? In which case is it anything more than noise? In any case, the point of the defining the word was to show that Enterprise != Large, nothing more. > > Just because the product has an enterprise label on it doesnt mean > it must behave according to rules set down by Merriam-Webster. Those > in control of RHEL get to say what enterprise means. This is, of which you are no-doubt quite cognisant, a straw-man augment. Nowhere in this discussion has anyone defined 'rules' or claimed that rules exist, in Merriam-Wester or elsewhere, in whatever form you imagine them to take. > > The time to argue about the merits of these changes is long past. > Muster whatever arguments you like, you cannot change the fact that > CentOS 7 includes these technologies. You only get a choice about > what to do about them, now. The earliest they could disappear again > is EL8, and thats both unlikely and 3 years away besides. This issue, as I see it, is not about CentOS-7 per se. It is about the path that RHEL seems to be following at the moment and what that might mean to current users sometime in the future. This forum is where I find those who share my interest in RHEL, albeit in the form of CentOS. I am seeking their views on the matter. I do not expect a solution here. Nor would I look for one on any of the multitudinous mailing lists associated with Fedora. A solution postulates a problem to solve. I am simply checking whether the RH environment suits our needs and whether it is likely to continue to suit; or is likely to change in ways that might prove most inconvenient, for us. We moved to RH5 (or 6 it was a long time ago, pre-RHEL) from HPUX. That change was driven equally by economics and a political change at HP with respect to its clients. It took the better part of five years to complete. If RHEL is changing such that 8 will be less useful than 7 or more considerably expensive to deploy than we can reasonably afford then we need to be looking now for a replacement. > >> I am not at all certain that >> back-porting security fixes to obsolescent software is a profitable >> activity when often for much the same effort, if not less, the most >> recent software could be made to run on the older release without >> adverse effects elsewhere. > > Please point to an example of an OS or OS-like software distribution > that does this. Why is that necessary? I am expressing my opinion about the value derived from the resources expended. I was not aware that I am not permitted to express such unless I can point to a representative distribution which somehow manifests an approach which affirms that opinion. That seems a little like saying only a tailor can comment on whether the emperor is wearing any clothes. In any case, it seems to me that the rather recent innovation of software collections indicates that perhaps I am not alone in that observation. As it happens a most useful, to me at least, piece of information was revealed in the course of this thread. That was the existence of a server based stream for Fedora. I have downloaded that ISO and intend to install it on a VM in the near future. If the results of that investigation prove satisfactory then that will go a long way to alleviating the doubts that my, admittedly limited, experience with CentOS-7 has engendered thus far. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] UC C-6, Gnome question
On Mon, January 12, 2015 09:40, Rushton Martin wrote: > > Another Firefox "funny" to be aware of occurs if you have a $HOME > shared between multiple machines. Firefox will refuse to start on the > second machine whilst the first is running Firefox, it believes that > there is already an instance running. Rebooting the second machine > will not help. The quick-and-dirty way around this is to log in as a > different user (and hence different $HOME) on the second machine. You will see the same effect on MicroSoft Domains with users using roaming profiles. They leave one host with FF open and go to another, log on and try, vainly, to start FF in the new session. I presume this has to do with preventing destructive overwrites of the user's profile but it is annoying. Not a Linux problem though. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] (py)curl error 7
Our network admin blocked ports (don't know why - i asked him 2 weeks before I started to troubleshoot the system). Everything is fine now, thanks for help. -Original Message- From: Mark Milhollan [mailto:m...@pixelgate.net] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:21 PM To: Mateusz Guz Subject: RE: [CentOS] (py)curl error 7 On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Mateusz Guz wrote: >Ip -6 a shows no output > >after "visual" inspection i don't see any ipv6 addresses assigned to my eth >interfaces > >On Mon, 29 Dec 2014, Mateusz Guz wrote: >>On Sun, 28 Dec 2014, Mark Milhollan wrote: >>>On Fri, 26 Dec 2014, Mateusz Guz wrote: > created /etc/modprobe.d/ipv6_disable.conf file with alias net-pf-10 off alias ipv6 off options ipv6 disable=1 >>> >>>These only take effect if you reboot or unload the modules manually. >> >>Tryning not to reboot, when unloading I get the message that the modules is >>in use. >>I think that forcing the unload is too dangerouse, read that it might resolve >>in kernel panic. > >Forcing an unload wouldn't be wise. You must stop using the module then >you can unload it. Busy usually means you have IPv6 addresses on some >interfaces -- ip -6 addr flush dev ethX. > > >/mark > Sorry, you'll have to find where else you are using IPv6. /mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 4
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2015:0029 CentOS 7 httpd BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2015:0026 CentOS 5 openssl BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:51:58 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0029 CentOS 7 httpd BugFix
Update
Message-ID: <20150112135158.ga54...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0029
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0029.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
744f3338e01129ad7500c508aa7bdf8100dc1453e0de0921dc41390117088995
httpd-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
79ad55851e9d1145e9ae968b1abe16a1f0d73c16086516fede81f80e3f35180d
httpd-devel-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
95242c4f7142243dbfb68be4c1c8b76b7160f65e3c9c06db239222466ea25aa7
httpd-manual-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
133ba146ad0e551467c55afe4387250035f07c9957843c282104c62d45fae90b
httpd-tools-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
9e781c17c1a914b8cf59bb38d894154a42b1545c1df30cf3d9ec53b2452ac541
mod_ldap-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
a62c536476780783e782f408e2443df1a6a88d9a83343b8f647e7ec6b0acd93f
mod_proxy_html-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
8cdcaa691924aecdc7827bf0d752e9c42ef03d67ee84166301174cf3fb468ee7
mod_session-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
48cb1fd76d126ed5484820b1db9818a5f2ca9a83ee5ccab3a981d43c1b673468
mod_ssl-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
8dd954944e236efb90c390003531eb9e843ae90fb8c7e6412c6c8ee06de68164
httpd-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:42:05 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0026 CentOS 5 openssl BugFix
Update
Message-ID: <20150112154205.ga25...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0026
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0026.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c51d4d7112d8378dfe6a0c2db25cbd354add6719d32b8ed9ff0a360a2c4f2845
openssl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.i386.rpm
8aa95692d839bedf943ed731773b6ee508d5c32093cacfb5876f0d0ca3e19704
openssl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.i686.rpm
8db507128fe18d9e2649097753f0d65342ccb8117d34d16b9d4effcd1519f2bc
openssl-devel-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.i386.rpm
fb599d51d7c0a6c5bccd3548fa76b820e84b82c266615c2814b52e8b466a3752
openssl-perl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.i386.rpm
x86_64:
8aa95692d839bedf943ed731773b6ee508d5c32093cacfb5876f0d0ca3e19704
openssl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.i686.rpm
289f5940753e6d3942a4ddf12c96f0f3b37685eccf5ca1709ccb46c620fed2d2
openssl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
8db507128fe18d9e2649097753f0d65342ccb8117d34d16b9d4effcd1519f2bc
openssl-devel-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.i386.rpm
203860bd05d32689b27f615bf5e9ccd3a41329fe8adc420c883f479437db11ee
openssl-devel-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
e0eda057349ff33bb14189da006aab9e9eda2b5a14c1efe351e1728e2ca5db4e
openssl-perl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c26a2660f5e767c292e4eac69840ad29e83ee39966d6379fdba633d2a6696cf0
openssl-0.9.8e-32.el5_11.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 119, Issue 4
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SELinux-alert: aide wants to write to /var/run/winbindd/pipe
Hi, does anyone know if aide should have access to this socket? SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/aide from write access on the sock_file /var/run/winbindd/pipe. Thanks Patrick (on CentOS6 if that matters) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Red Hat Developer Toolset 3 for CentOS6?
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:18:27 +0100 wwp wrote: > I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid > of a v3 of the toolset? > > I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc > 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If > not, the sources will rule. > > Any hint? The hint often comes after a deeper look on the Internet: http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/scl/ (1.1 and 2 are accessible too, but slightly differently) Thanks to the Cern, sorry for the noise, at least it serves the archives. Regards, -- wwp pgpMBnaq5nnJH.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk
Have you tried manually putting the kernel/initrd files where they are missing from? Having said that, relying on this machine as a server seems questionable under the circumstances. :-) Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Gilbert Sebenste" > To: centos@centos.org > Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 16:13:56 > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 6.6 64-bit won't install on a 3 TB disk > Hello everyone, > > I'm having an issue getting a C6.6 install to work on a 3 TB dual hard > drive system, raid 0. I'm hoping that someone here can help. > > So, I install as normal, but then reboot, and it comes to a grub prompt. > Going into the system via Linux rescue, I see that most of the files > dealing with the kernel haven't been installed. > > I asked the maker of the server and he said that they have noticed this > happen recently. A solution is to put the kernel files on a thumb drive, > and then point the OS to look for them there. > > I have yet to try it, but is there a better way to deal with this issue > that anyone else has done? > > Gilbert > > *** > Gilbert Sebenste > (My opinions only!) ** > *** > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Red Hat Developer Toolset 3 for CentOS6?
Hi all, I could find the 1.1 and 2 repos gently provided by Tru Huynh, but quid of a v3 of the toolset? I've just found that Qt 5.4 requires what's shipped in this v3 (gcc 4.9.1, binutils 2.24) and would prefer installing those from a repo. If not, the sources will rule. Any hint? Regards, -- wwp pgpmSnUGnb8Gh.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
