Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? Thanks Tim On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:35 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 3/2/2015 2:34 PM, John R Pierce wrote: step 1) delete FTPD, and use ssh/scp/rscp instead. errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? Maybe use FTP in a jail? Or Linux containers? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On 3/2/2015 2:34 PM, John R Pierce wrote: step 1) delete FTPD, and use ssh/scp/rscp instead. errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? FTP is not safe as it does not encrypt username(s) and password(s) or traffic during transfer. RHEL/Centos provides SELinux booleans and settings at least for vsftpd (very secure ftpd). Please use it, if possible. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] selinux allow FTP
Hey folks, How would I allow a user to connect to an FTP server, upload and download files and delete files as well, if that server is in enforcing mode for SELinux? I'm using proftpd 1.3.5 on CentOS 7. Thank you! Tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On 3/2/2015 2:31 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: How would I allow a user to connect to an FTP server, upload and download files and delete files as well, if that server is in enforcing mode for SELinux? step 1) delete FTPD, and use ssh/scp/rscp instead. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
Also check this out: http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge -- Eero 2015-03-03 0:51 GMT+02:00 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: 2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? FTP is not safe as it does not encrypt username(s) and password(s) or traffic during transfer. RHEL/Centos provides SELinux booleans and settings at least for vsftpd (very secure ftpd). Please use it, if possible. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Mário Barbosa wrote: 1) Install ntfs support yum install -y epel-release yum install -y ntfs-3g ntfsprogs 2) re-run the grub config gen script grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Best, Mário Ah, Mario, that's exactly what I needed to know! thanks! It seems rather like a chicken-and-the-egg problem, which came first? you can't install ntfs-3g until you've installed the system, and it won't notice the windows partition(s) there until you've installed ntfs-3g. But it sets up the grub config at install time, so you get a system apparently without windows support. A newbie (which I'm not) would certainly find this confusing/disheartening. Ahh yes, good tip. I'm pretty sure dual-boot on CentOS is de-emphasized or maybe flat out not supported, is probably why ntfs3-g isn't on the installer media. On Fedora, that's a required based package because of explicit dual boot support, and it's necessary because the installer uses ntfs-3g to resize the Windows volume to make room for Fedora. -- Chris Murphy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: Ah, perhaps I didn't think to mention that I was installing Centos as a replacement for F19 (which is now EOL). You did, I wasn't paying close enough attention. Sorry. -- Chris Murphy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
Good advice guys. I'll check out vsftpd. Thanks! Tim Sent from my iPhone On Mar 2, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: Also check this out: http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge -- Eero 2015-03-03 0:51 GMT+02:00 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: 2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? FTP is not safe as it does not encrypt username(s) and password(s) or traffic during transfer. RHEL/Centos provides SELinux booleans and settings at least for vsftpd (very secure ftpd). Please use it, if possible. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: Short solution: Does /etc/default/grub contain 'GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true ? If so, comment that out and rerun the grub2-mkconfig command. No, it doesn't contain that line. Weird. So that means os-prober isn't finding Windows. What do you get for the following commands: # parted /dev/sdX u s p ##X= drive with windows on it # os-prober -- Chris Murphy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On 03/02/2015 11:55 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Also check this out: http://www.bitvise.com/ftp-bridge you could also recommend filezilla to your clients, it's available for mac, microsoft and linux and supports sftp. But I know there are still use cases for ftp. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 06:05:37PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Mário Barbosa wrote: 1) Install ntfs support yum install -y epel-release yum install -y ntfs-3g ntfsprogs 2) re-run the grub config gen script grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Best, Mário Ah, Mario, that's exactly what I needed to know! thanks! It seems rather like a chicken-and-the-egg problem, which came first? you can't install ntfs-3g until you've installed the system, and it won't notice the windows partition(s) there until you've installed ntfs-3g. But it sets up the grub config at install time, so you get a system apparently without windows support. A newbie (which I'm not) would certainly find this confusing/disheartening. Ahh yes, good tip. I'm pretty sure dual-boot on CentOS is de-emphasized or maybe flat out not supported, is probably why ntfs3-g isn't on the installer media. On Fedora, that's a required based package because of explicit dual boot support, and it's necessary because the installer uses ntfs-3g to resize the Windows volume to make room for Fedora. So that's why it worked with F19. I sure didn't know Anaconda could resize the Windoze partition for you... I did it with gparted-live when I installed F19. As my mom used to say: You live and learn!: -- --- .Fred Smith / ( /__ ,__. __ __ / __ : / // / /__) / / /__) .+' Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us // (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 Jude 1:24,25 - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] X11 fonts question
I'm having trouble figuring out which RPM would contain X11 fonts that go by names containing: -courier-medium-r-*-18- -courier-bold-r-*-18- -courier-medium-o-*-18- in sizes 18 (shown), 14, and 12. so far I can't figure it out. I've looked at the contents of all the xorg-x11-fonts-* packages that yum list available | grep xorg-x11-fonts lists. The best I've come up with is a bunch that contain files named *-cour-* followed by some uppercase characters whose meaning I don't know (where I show above). Since I seem to be fairly clueless on this topic, I'd welcome any useful advice that any of you can give. thanks! -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - Show me your ways, O LORD, teach me your paths; Guide me in your truth and teach me, for you are God my Savior, And my hope is in you all day long. -- Psalm 25:4-5 (NIV) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:24:47AM +, Richard wrote:
Original Message
Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 21:50:34 -0500
From: Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual
boot
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 02:04:24AM +, Richard wrote:
Original Message
Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 20:06:26 -0500
From: Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
Hi all!
I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7
(and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The
Fedora installer had found the windows installation and it
appeared in the grub menu, and was bootable and worked fine.
The C7 installer did not put the windows installation into the
grub menu.
with some googling I found a page at
https://priteshugrankar.wordpress.com/2014/09/12/dual-booting-c
ent os-7-and-windows-7/ that gives a simple recipe for fixing
this problem. basically:
cp /boot/grub2/grub.cfg orig.grub.cfg
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
with (on his system) the second command above producing this
output:
[root@localhost ~]# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.16.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
Found initrd image:
/boot/initramfs-3.16.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.img Found linux
image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image:
/boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image:
/boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image:
/boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64.img Found linux
image:
/boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-327fe33f3b364802871211321a2790b7 Found
initrd image:
/boot/initramfs-0-rescue-327fe33f3b364802871211321a2790b7.img
Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda1
Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda2
done
Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this:
Generating grub configuration file ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64
Found initrd image:
/boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.img Found linux
image:
/boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7 Found
initrd image:
/boot/initramfs-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7.img
done
No mention of the windows installation.
It's not that I use the win7 installation much, but I do want to
be able to do so when one of those rare occasions pops up.
Thanks in advance!
Fred
I too encountered this issue putting centos7 on a win7 machine.
The solution is to:
edit:
/etc/grub.d/40_custom
putting in:
menuentry 'name' {
insmod ntfs
set root=(hd0,2)
chainloader +1
}
note: name can be anything you want (within reason), and is the
name that will show in the boot menu.
So, I did this. I'm assuming that 'name' should be bare, with no
quotes? well, I tried it both ways, makes no difference. The
grub-mkconfig does not emit any lines about having found windows.
its output looks the same as what I showed in the original mail,
above.
there are 3 windows partitions, two of which appeared in grub
previously. Here's the entry I made:
menuentry Win-7 {
insmod ntfs
set root=(hd0,1)
chainloader +1
}
the values here:
root=(hd0,2)
will vary based on your disk setup. if you still have your fc19
grub/grub2 (whichever it used) configuration file you should be
able to confirm the values from that.
I can still access the files (I made an image of the disk), but
grub2 configurations are not human-readable, so I can't figure it
out from that. however, if I look at the drive image with fdisk,
it shows partition 2 as being bootable, so I used (hd0,1). maybe I
s hould try (hd0,2) as an alternative...
when done, then:
grub2-mkconfig -o output file
personally, i didn't set the -o to the production grub.cfg file as
my preference is to make backups and check things before
potentially trashing a file like that, but do as you wish. when
you're comfortable with the generated file move it to the
production location and reboot.
- Richard
I believe you need quotes around the name value, but will admit I
haven't tried without.
Correct, the grub2-mkconfig command doesn't emit lines about
windows, but it puts the above lines into the resulting
(grub2/grub.cfg) file - towards the bottom. [You could hand-edit
these lines into that file if you want, but having them in the
40_custom file means that they will be included
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0273 CentOS 6 ksh BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0273
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0273.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
1b18a7ba2e3dfd59515f0d722a92cf970474bb1d4b4be5014bbd30050f90c5a4
ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
b7fa412e41427c37a6bc017787ba5904bceee292e9e583b4b53f67353e43dff6
ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fd62e15f6e729922a78ed7c883041dc2267ce380fabd25575c5d467d033d5043
ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). If you want dodge a fight with grub, you can install EasyBCD (to windows OS) and handles multiple systems. (you can found a trial version): http://neosmart.net/EasyBCD/ I use it to handles 4 os tell me... Pol ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote: Hi all! I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu, and was bootable and worked fine. The C7 installer did not put the windows installation into the grub menu. with some googling I found a page at https://priteshugrankar.wordpress.com/2014/09/12/dual-booting-centos-7-and-windows-7/ that gives a simple recipe for fixing this problem. basically: cp /boot/grub2/grub.cfg orig.grub.cfg grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg with (on his system) the second command above producing this output: [root@localhost ~]# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.16.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.16.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-327fe33f3b364802871211321a2790b7 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-0-rescue-327fe33f3b364802871211321a2790b7.img Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda1 Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda2 done Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7.img done No mention of the windows installation. It's not that I use the win7 installation much, but I do want to be able to do so when one of those rare occasions pops up. Thanks in advance! Fred 1) Install ntfs support yum install -y epel-release yum install -y ntfs-3g ntfsprogs 2) re-run the grub config gen script grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Best, Mário ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Mário Barbosa wrote: On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote: Hi all! I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu, and was bootable and worked fine. The C7 installer did not put the windows installation into the grub menu. with some googling I found a page at https://priteshugrankar.wordpress.com/2014/09/12/dual-booting-centos-7-and-windows-7/ that gives a simple recipe for fixing this problem. basically: cp /boot/grub2/grub.cfg orig.grub.cfg grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg with (on his system) the second command above producing this output: [root@localhost ~]# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.16.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.16.2-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-327fe33f3b364802871211321a2790b7 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-0-rescue-327fe33f3b364802871211321a2790b7.img Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda1 Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/sda2 done Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7.img done No mention of the windows installation. It's not that I use the win7 installation much, but I do want to be able to do so when one of those rare occasions pops up. Thanks in advance! Fred 1) Install ntfs support yum install -y epel-release yum install -y ntfs-3g ntfsprogs 2) re-run the grub config gen script grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg Best, Mário Ah, Mario, that's exactly what I needed to know! thanks! It seems rather like a chicken-and-the-egg problem, which came first? you can't install ntfs-3g until you've installed the system, and it won't notice the windows partition(s) there until you've installed ntfs-3g. But it sets up the grub config at install time, so you get a system apparently without windows support. A newbie (which I'm not) would certainly find this confusing/disheartening. Thanks again for the solution I needed! Fred -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 (niv) -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2015:0277 CentOS 6 cyrus-imapd Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0277
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0277.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d594d24cd32730c0b708488b16ce239e31bd896535cf6616ff69c2a50f0b5204
cyrus-imapd-2.3.16-13.el6_6.i686.rpm
fa4fdbb3abca0dd103b3204915ef7e1c0f2cd0c65a5f768f80cebc2c148396b0
cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.16-13.el6_6.i686.rpm
98f1663fc3f2139c6dabfdba2237fb8168d259a115c38dcb16159bb0504c3749
cyrus-imapd-utils-2.3.16-13.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
ccba4c5dbc695d2bece41d9bce8031d49b5b76aae92064796f8c6d70cedfa2dc
cyrus-imapd-2.3.16-13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
fa4fdbb3abca0dd103b3204915ef7e1c0f2cd0c65a5f768f80cebc2c148396b0
cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.16-13.el6_6.i686.rpm
a34d8ff05fbf1b12aedc6808b6675399f9d3ddd557172c5519db86cfdf511769
cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.16-13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
cd49a8be2cbe05621ccb9c701acc7c3223edc559d00a503a49dcbbf952bf0aad
cyrus-imapd-utils-2.3.16-13.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
81d04d82b259e081600a6d9378327e2040a929b0d6e6e63e305c4cadaff19322
cyrus-imapd-2.3.16-13.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0274 CentOS 6 ruby BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0274
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0274.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
71234f9406eca6a41884cbaaff642485e10e0a031e300e1d054453e9cfb14ff8
ruby-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
b3163be4b0290781509741fe40c3f31d590507101a8a49a874f52cc3481ebb0b
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
ed32c82f71478c9ff251d81d48db568b90371e067b67090dc611018a80cdc32b
ruby-docs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
f074916f420a394ff4f6e102dfbd0264896630817e70c25ae122cb4662b25cc5
ruby-irb-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
99c696d220f88578b9ac908c52d7c7d50fc1cde62f5b90beaff61a2cabb7d55b
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
95043fecd149c116e7596fecdef5765e2518f38e56f192b73d5d7435acd3951a
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
3e070909710e9329b92b570c6128057122d2b1c04a97a62a8ac8a47bc9e79ed7
ruby-ri-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
1d80cda61fc8cd6f4d65ce605197b71ed8d774d5006c702bee281988203636fb
ruby-static-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
bee5cf1fd558d263b3cafff8c1d28abf2fdfb64f84cf552002e2b30dce443f29
ruby-tcltk-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
760db1ec22721384125263dc7d4f8f5e74d6d6cb1867659e17e6a8fdbc5726b2
ruby-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
b3163be4b0290781509741fe40c3f31d590507101a8a49a874f52cc3481ebb0b
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
0821dea5d7e3d79c9b8faa01275706d411f61a846bc78d94e305da06f46d6585
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
542442bc6e620e6c11bd0ea9a49c0e1dc7e16ac57a0b76bd1f8b1543e43b0c1a
ruby-docs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
e04c1fc17afdfd29e1e23d788c47715894b553cc90318e4146d3d93d65a0cf3a
ruby-irb-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
99c696d220f88578b9ac908c52d7c7d50fc1cde62f5b90beaff61a2cabb7d55b
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
b473a43d5c201bf9706ab1cbe2d6ef0fc1a6042295e20753d8307326b2fce116
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
93b3e1baf539d598efe1a1ab094e6718d10472947086ca7e89638615c8b57dbd
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
f2d677239f26999f710bb228e57525a64ab0b95f3b9ec2e384daa1b5b1569a26
ruby-ri-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
e5cd12caa438960187e3c724592de30ff80cc9e14ebf9b3c5a0fe3ab9550ff6d
ruby-static-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
9dbe206d541870495944580e18247031fc0873f33b2711d19aa2ccaaed1b559c
ruby-tcltk-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d59e8ddea5341b50b411253dd5b5c9975038a9b880a12d9675ebb4b7b71ec8e1
ruby-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2015:0275 CentOS 5 cyrus-imapd Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0275
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0275.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
dd29d23eccd0d884980bc486eed5898294616b5f1698644409e5ec0e5b0eec28
cyrus-imapd-2.3.7-16.el5_11.i386.rpm
424a0ef95930ae543fec2c8415be603232330050651f70493f148133ced97381
cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.7-16.el5_11.i386.rpm
ba67ad052b541adb36b0f8f1ae395b5ab5621f7860fdac559c08ae8cedd02148
cyrus-imapd-perl-2.3.7-16.el5_11.i386.rpm
0309b20c3f0672234fdd6c831ac425be8de30c2e1f2e3e40a66b708224e37762
cyrus-imapd-utils-2.3.7-16.el5_11.i386.rpm
x86_64:
f6fa3aed83cfd51c8bb41c2cf9b9c6c3f3b5a6212feae5ea70f21f9a777e01be
cyrus-imapd-2.3.7-16.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
424a0ef95930ae543fec2c8415be603232330050651f70493f148133ced97381
cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.7-16.el5_11.i386.rpm
b01915f3ac66d050a0707518fb798891b1e6dd27e98eb7f529c315b23bb2469f
cyrus-imapd-devel-2.3.7-16.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
85f3ad6fefeaf3f0e104a98e305f1d45cc3caa998ee11d50d86da6f2ce6aa088
cyrus-imapd-perl-2.3.7-16.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
8bdcac1856535d4972f6c0d955f784af66d0c62b1027ae299e76895245990ec5
cyrus-imapd-utils-2.3.7-16.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
Source:
646f5530c92f50b0f248e2469af4795a46825dbec4e8bef9f5c44685241a76b4
cyrus-imapd-2.3.7-16.el5_11.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 09:26:59PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7.img done No mention of the windows installation. Short solution: Does /etc/default/grub contain 'GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true ? If so, comment that out and rerun the grub2-mkconfig command. No, it doesn't contain that line. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. --- Romans 5:8 (niv) -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 09:41:06PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: Unfortunately, when I did it, I got this: Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64.img Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7 Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-0-rescue-c875112952114f6284f69abaa4f9a2f7.img done No mention of the windows installation. No mention of the Fedora installation either. So how are you going to boot Fedora 19? Ah, perhaps I didn't think to mention that I was installing Centos as a replacement for F19 (which is now EOL). -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. --- Corinthians 5:21 - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS7 buggy freeradius
Bonjour, It seems that freeradius 3.0.1-6.el7 of centOS 7 don't work. When doing very simple authentification (PAP control of ssh login on a switch), I get a segmentation fault when the first accounting packet arrives on the server. Does anyone test succesfully this version of freeradius ? Thanks PS: no error with the compilation of the last source version of freeradius (3.0.7) -- __ Jean-Luc Oms STI-RéseauX - LIRMM - CNRS/UM2 161 rue Ada - CC 477 34095 Montpellier cedex 5 Tel +33 4 67 41 85 93 Urg +33 6 32 01 04 17 __ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?
I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want to equip gethostbyname() with additional code. Do you plan on shipping this updated glibc as part of the product, or is this simply for testing? If you plan to distribute/ship an updated glibc, that's probably going to raise a few eyebrows and anger a few sysadmins. No release. Only testing. My objective is to rebuild from source the EXACT version of GlibC for CentOS 6.6. Afterwards, I will make my changes in the code, rebuild and complete my testing. libc.so.6 reports: GNU C Library stable release version 2.12, by Roland McGrath et al. Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Compiled by GNU CC version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11). Compiled on a Linux 2.6.32 system on 2015-01-27. Available extensions: The C stubs add-on version 2.1.2. crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al BIND-8.2.3-T5B RT using linux kernel aio libc ABIs: UNIQUE IFUNC For bug reporting instructions, please see: http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html. But, when looking through the source code for this version on the CentOS servers I only see: http://vault.centos.org/6.6/updates/Source/SPackages/ [ ] glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.4.src.rpm07-Jan-2015 22:45 15M [ ] glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.src.rpm27-Jan-2015 23:13 15M Please point me to the correct source tarball, and all required patches so that I can reconstruct my loaded version of GlibC. A yum command is also acceptable. Those src.rpms contain the source and the patches. You may want to read over http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM for info. Great! Thank you Jim Perrin, Frank Cox, Earl A Ramirez and Stphen Harris for your responses. Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?
On 28 February 2015 at 05:49, ANDY KENNEDY andy.kenn...@adtran.com wrote: I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want to equip gethostbyname() with additional code. I may be way out of line here, haven't had much coffee yet, but I wonder if systemtap could be used to achieve your goals less intrusively? Already knowing how to build GlibC, I think that may take less of my time than attempting to figure out how to use systemtap. But, you better believe that I'll keep that in mind ::throws in toolbox:: for later. This one I need to be as fast as possible on. Thanks for the info! Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?
On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want to equip gethostbyname() with additional code. Do you plan on shipping this updated glibc as part of the product, or is this simply for testing? If you plan to distribute/ship an updated glibc, that's probably going to raise a few eyebrows and anger a few sysadmins. No release. Only testing. Also, please be advised that rebuilding a package and then trying to compare it to something else built earlier is likely not going to work unless you can duplicate the exact set of packages that are installed in the build root at the time of the build. Even then, with documentation generation, you STILL might not get an exact, bit for bit, match when building later. It is almost impossible to duplicate a closed and staged build system for a give date unless you are trying very hard to do so. My objective is to rebuild from source the EXACT version of GlibC for CentOS 6.6. Afterwards, I will make my changes in the code, rebuild and complete my testing. ^^ That would likely be impossible to accomplish. See my comments above. snip Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources?
On 03/02/2015 11:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/02/2015 10:38 AM, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: I'm tasked with reconstructing the CentOS version of the GlibC library for testing with gethostbyname(). My mission is to show that we are not affected by the latest exploit for the product we are shipping targeted for RHEL and CentOS. To do so, I want to equip gethostbyname() with additional code. Do you plan on shipping this updated glibc as part of the product, or is this simply for testing? If you plan to distribute/ship an updated glibc, that's probably going to raise a few eyebrows and anger a few sysadmins. No release. Only testing. Also, please be advised that rebuilding a package and then trying to compare it to something else built earlier is likely not going to work unless you can duplicate the exact set of packages that are installed in the build root at the time of the build. Even then, with documentation generation, you STILL might not get an exact, bit for bit, match when building later. It is almost impossible to duplicate a closed and staged build system for a give date unless you are trying very hard to do so. My objective is to rebuild from source the EXACT version of GlibC for CentOS 6.6. Afterwards, I will make my changes in the code, rebuild and complete my testing. ^^ That would likely be impossible to accomplish. See my comments above. snip The list of packages that were in the mock build root for our build of the glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.5.x86_64.src.rpm is here: http://ur1.ca/ju24m To get close to an exact match, you need to use mock and use the packages listed above (and only those versions) if you are trying to get a build that matches what we built. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] NFS and inode64
Well, we got it working. However, the issue we're now worried about is users creating files and subdirectories. Do we need to worry, and if so, is there some way to reserve inodes 32k table, other than creating tens of thousands of dummy files now? We don't want, a year or two down the road, for this system to be running, and suddenly everything's broken, because all lower inodes have been used. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NFS and inode64
On 3/2/2015 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Well, we got it working. However, the issue we're now worried about is users creating files and subdirectories. Do we need to worry, and if so, is there some way to reserve inodes 32k table, other than creating tens of thousands of dummy files now? We don't want, a year or two down the road, for this system to be running, and suddenly everything's broken, because all lower inodes have been used. inodes of individual files on the file system behind NFS don't matter. the only issue is, NFS defaults to using the folder's inode as the fsid. my solution to this is to just generate an arbitrary unique integer fsid on each share in /etc/exports on the server... just add ,fsid=# in the (options) field, where # is 1,2,3,4... -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NFS and inode64
John R Pierce wrote: On 3/2/2015 11:56 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Well, we got it working. However, the issue we're now worried about is users creating files and subdirectories. Do we need to worry, and if so, is there some way to reserve inodes 32k table, other than creating tens of thousands of dummy files now? We don't want, a year or two down the road, for this system to be running, and suddenly everything's broken, because all lower inodes have been used. inodes of individual files on the file system behind NFS don't matter. the only issue is, NFS defaults to using the folder's inode as the fsid. my solution to this is to just generate an arbitrary unique integer fsid on each share in /etc/exports on the server... just add ,fsid=# in the (options) field, where # is 1,2,3,4... When I first created it, I tried that, and it complained. I have another system, a new one, which we'll be using for backups; I can try it on that (the original one's *really* not somewhere to play, since my manager's manager has a team all over it, working up to a very high profile demo a week from now) Thanks. I'll look at this. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
