[CentOS] CentOS 7
Two quick questions: 1) I have not found where I can set the workspaces to 1, not 4. Where is that. 2) My install (text mode only) seems to be using F1 as X11, I have to switch to ALT-F2 to get a login prompt. What controls that? X is not running, this is a console only. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-virt] libvirtd for el7
Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt = 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=251 -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:16 +0200, Tim wrote: I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.) The examples of the opener show this. Something else could be integrity checking possibly. I imagine a tool/script that could apply hardening stuff. Regards Tim Am 22. April 2015 09:23:52 MESZ, schrieb Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: Sounds like a bit basic stuff? How about hardening ciphers, two factor authentication, snort, web application firewall and scap scanning? Eero 22.4.2015 10.14 ap. Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com kirjoitti: SELinux? On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: apply also ideas from this document: https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130 that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks for all of your input guys, there were some discussion on the centos-devel list [0], which will give you a better idea of what this SIG will aim to accomplish. We will be happy to see you guys over on the centos-devel list and if possible chip in to make this SIG a success. [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013280.html -- Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7
On 04/22/2015 07:52 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: Two quick questions: 1) I have not found where I can set the workspaces to 1, not 4. Where is that. gnome-tweak-tool - shell - Dynamic workspaces (ignore the 'off' setting) and set 4 - 1. 2) My install (text mode only) seems to be using F1 as X11, I have to switch to ALT-F2 to get a login prompt. What controls that? X is not running, this is a console only. systemd somewhere. I've not dug far enough into that. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] (Solved: nouveau driver is the source of kworker issue) Centos 7 kworker uses 100% of single core on mulit-core processor usage inquiry
Greetings everyone. I ran the cat on the proc files for the reference pid before I sent the first email, however here it is, since I never listed the contents. sudo cat /proc/91/stack [] 0x And when following the information from the closed bugzilla debug info, I get the following: cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe |grep cpu=7 kworker/7:1-91[007] d.s. 211349.026006: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=88083edcfff0 function=cs_dbs_timer workqueue=88081e008c00 req_cpu=7 cpu=7 kworker/7:1-91[007] d... 211349.123123: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=88080e2ba2f8 function=nouveau_connector_hotplug_work [nouveau] workqueue=88081e008c00 req_cpu=5120 cpu=7 kworker/7:1-91[007] d.h. 211349.123156: workqueue_queue_work: work struct=88080e30e448 function=nvkm_connector_hpd_work [nouveau] workqueue=88081e008c00 req_cpu=5120 cpu=7 These messages are cyclically printed to the trace_pipe file, in this order. I figured that this may be sourced within the fact that the nouveau driver is being used, instead of the NVidia drivers I was using last fall while doing CUDA research. I had a Titan in there, and have reverted back to a more basic card, just prior to the water cooler dying. I re-installed the newest NVidia driver from nvidia and the kworker issue disappears. However, true to Linux form, this action has somehow screwed up my GUI experience, causing 1) the graphic window manager fails to start, and just sits there in the text based startup screan saying it is trying to start GNOME Login Manager, etc.. 2) If I remove GNOME and reinstall KDE you boot into a text based login, and once in there you can startx and KDE will start, but as soon as I try to open firefox the GUI dies, and the messages say something about a ksmserver not being accessible, etc... However, with KDE running, I have full access to the NVidia management tools, so it was working, with HDMI audio on the second monitor, etc... So now I have to fix my GUI desktop environment, for whatever reason, however, all basic services are running such as the VMs and DNS, etc... Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-6.6 - wget $? returns 0 when invalid protocol used
Can someone enlighten me why this: wget --quiet --no-check-certificate ttps://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois/master/example/jwhois.conf ; echo $? returns this: 0 When wget --no-quiet says this: wget --no-quiet --no-check-certificate ttps://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois/master/example/jwhois.conf ; echo $? ttps://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois/master/example/jwhois.conf: Unsupported scheme `ttps'. 0 Is not an unsupported scheme an error in much the same fashion as an invalid URI? Should it not return an non-zero value in '$?' ? wget https://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois/master/example/jwhois.conf ; echo $? --2015-04-22 09:50:48-- https://flub.githubusercontent.com/jodrell/jwhois/master/example/jwhois.conf Resolving flub.githubusercontent.com... 199.27.75.133 Connecting to flub.githubusercontent.com|199.27.75.133|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Domain Not Found 2015-04-22 09:50:49 ERROR 500: Domain Not Found. 8 -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0871 CentOS 6 dbus BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0871
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0871.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
154884ae0ff5a4a9ed7aff22f58bb5539f932f18ca469890a30193e10e21da45
dbus-1.2.24-8.el6_6.i686.rpm
1032a57d04f2f53d29f758562d5a58490ca395fdfa59b96d4a8845becbe9c601
dbus-devel-1.2.24-8.el6_6.i686.rpm
5e3ebdeaec7d9e936bed965c6126fa5c2e09cae009d9113ab2fd3ab524108ca5
dbus-doc-1.2.24-8.el6_6.noarch.rpm
831edc20cf2faf3c49c669de67053534dcd46c21a9320331441bbb5667d952c1
dbus-libs-1.2.24-8.el6_6.i686.rpm
dc5db046ac22f2ba0520805021f4a3207290fbff10226befa0bd2f36e706f3c7
dbus-x11-1.2.24-8.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
62d7b03f9a215c2ed46745f01d8840de1dda8747eee4eae317fad942850c43f8
dbus-1.2.24-8.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
1032a57d04f2f53d29f758562d5a58490ca395fdfa59b96d4a8845becbe9c601
dbus-devel-1.2.24-8.el6_6.i686.rpm
82901ad649682842fedda2f2641b44a32a536d2eaeb431c0d5dee96d54fa9302
dbus-devel-1.2.24-8.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
5e3ebdeaec7d9e936bed965c6126fa5c2e09cae009d9113ab2fd3ab524108ca5
dbus-doc-1.2.24-8.el6_6.noarch.rpm
831edc20cf2faf3c49c669de67053534dcd46c21a9320331441bbb5667d952c1
dbus-libs-1.2.24-8.el6_6.i686.rpm
e412f3b9c5a250d9b08617f967ff5a0b81cddd7dc31c57bd4dc6a8fba2fee7da
dbus-libs-1.2.24-8.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
e5af547513f8bd81ad1b52eea43b7d93b3a00304c882e072744634b25727ba9b
dbus-x11-1.2.24-8.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
97c5927a869793f0edd404c59b0d89d15c2d4db3b466b49ed25f00949b1eca84
dbus-1.2.24-8.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0869 Important CentOS 5 kvm Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0869 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0869.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
110cfc729e2e536ea057491fa59ad58b2a601de7a68914954d47b359df8ce677
kmod-kvm-83-270.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
f23c984edf95cb75ab3a14337693c29cc031b98a2c83203742910742bfbb2a4a
kmod-kvm-debug-83-270.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
efd27316bb50ba740b8572395eda046d47b82c0cfa4fb17954a6414442d55c83
kvm-83-270.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
be2b6fe5f10ea4ae06b261269c6b2b4cd1a960b40322770584a23515ecde78da
kvm-qemu-img-83-270.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
d5c445566348626991bb0d9a11a62e8002df8e542d79c8ecdd7bc4b4d30d673f
kvm-tools-83-270.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
eb82ad54a0dd3a25e5f95c1c2a4ea4c9bb4d8e9039427c55c485edaef20a0fc5
kvm-83-270.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] libvirtd for el7
Hi, I'm using since three weeks on my EL7 Desktop a rebuilt version of libvirt 1.2.14 without any problems. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/builds/ JML Le 22/04/2015 15:28, Sandro Bonazzola a écrit : Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt = 1.2.9 for EL7for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=251 ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
I am very interested. One of my suggestions: Firewall: Network based firewall zone assignment (possibly disabling interface based assignment) Regards Tim Am 22. April 2015 07:13:52 MESZ, schrieb Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com: Dear All, About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore, I am extending that email to this community; where there is a larger community. Some things that we will like to achieve are as follows: SSH: disable root (uncomment 'PermitRootLogin' and change to no) enable 'strictMode' modify 'MaxAuthTries' modify 'ClientAliveInterval' modify 'ClientAliveCountMax' Gnome: disable Gnome user list Console: Remove reboot, halt poweroff from /etc/security/console.app Applying security best practises from various compliance perspective, e.g. STIG, SOX, PCI etc... We may also use NSA RHEL 5 secure configuration guide to get some insight or use it as a baseline. The members of the community who are interested in this SIG or are willing to contribute are: Leam Hall Corey Henderson Jason Pyeron You can find the post here [0] We will really like to get SIG approved by the CentOS board so if anyone is interested or willing to contribute we will be happy to have you onboard. [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013197.html -- Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
apply also ideas from this document: https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130 -- Eero 2015-04-22 9:30 GMT+03:00 Tim li...@kiuni.de: I am very interested. One of my suggestions: Firewall: Network based firewall zone assignment (possibly disabling interface based assignment) Regards Tim Am 22. April 2015 07:13:52 MESZ, schrieb Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com: Dear All, About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore, I am extending that email to this community; where there is a larger community. Some things that we will like to achieve are as follows: SSH: disable root (uncomment 'PermitRootLogin' and change to no) enable 'strictMode' modify 'MaxAuthTries' modify 'ClientAliveInterval' modify 'ClientAliveCountMax' Gnome: disable Gnome user list Console: Remove reboot, halt poweroff from /etc/security/console.app Applying security best practises from various compliance perspective, e.g. STIG, SOX, PCI etc... We may also use NSA RHEL 5 secure configuration guide to get some insight or use it as a baseline. The members of the community who are interested in this SIG or are willing to contribute are: Leam Hall Corey Henderson Jason Pyeron You can find the post here [0] We will really like to get SIG approved by the CentOS board so if anyone is interested or willing to contribute we will be happy to have you onboard. [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013197.html -- Earl A Ramirez earlarami...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to stagger fsck executions
From: Warren Young Sent: April 21, 2015 14:13 On Apr 21, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: From: Kay Diederichs Sent: April 21, 2015 03:43 instead of having 20 for all of them, set the first filesystem to 17, the second to 19, the third to 23, and the fourth to 29. Thanks but that is not much different then my second idea and does not fully avoid the problem. You may be missing a key fact of how prime numbers work. You are right and I stand corrected. I have done some what if testing. Assuming 8 filesystems and weekly reboots over a ten year period... The random numbers would result in as many as 40 weeks per year where 2, 3 or 4 fscks would be run in the same week depending on the random numbers selected. Using the prime numbers 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 and 31 the is a maximum of 7 incidents per year of 2 fscks per week and none for 3 or more. Clearly the prime numbers are better. Thank, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] semi-OT: t-bird mime type on .pdf attachment is wrong
I was sending my manager a copy of a form, and attached it (not inline), using -t-bird, and he complains it didn't want to open. Looking at the message source, t-bird had decided that the mime type was all/allfiles, though the name ended in .pdf. I've searched via the config editor, and I've been googling, and not finding anything. (I just *adore* the current google: I have +all/allfiles in the search terms, and in the para it displays on a hit I see all somethingorother, with the word all bolded) Anyone got ideas? I've looked in .thunderbird/blah.default/mime_types.rdf, and everything looks good in there. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] IP aliases for services (including dhcpd)?
I'd like to consolidate the services from several old servers onto 2 CentOS7 VMs that are currently running dhcpd in a balanced/failover configuration. It will simplify things to add the IPs from the old servers as aliases, at least temporarily so everything will continue to connect without changes. However, after adding the first one, I see in the logs that DHCPD is sending its DHCPACKs alternating between ens192 and ens192:0 every other time, but oddly it is always using the non-alias IP as the source every time according to tcpdump -n. Is this configuration likely to confuse anything? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] IP aliases for services (including dhcpd)?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, David Both db...@millennium-technology.com wrote: Yes confusion will abound. There should only ever be one and only one DHCP server on any network. With two you will sooner of later have multiple DHCP client hosts with the same IP addresses. No, it's not going to give out duplicate IPs. The dual servers are configured as primary/secondary and know about each other with some protocol to track what leases are already out. https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00502/0/A-Basic-Guide-to-Configuring-DHCP-Failover.html My question is just about multiple IPs as aliases on the server side. So far it looks like it is always sending with the same source IP even though it logs that it used the alias interface name. I'm just wondering if it would confuse clients if it gets an IP from one source and subsequent ACKs from another. But, I guess that has been happening for a long time already with the dual server setup. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] IP aliases for services (including dhcpd)?
Yes confusion will abound. There should only ever be one and only one DHCP server on any network. With two you will sooner of later have multiple DHCP client hosts with the same IP addresses. On 04/22/2015 03:36 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: I'd like to consolidate the services from several old servers onto 2 CentOS7 VMs that are currently running dhcpd in a balanced/failover configuration. It will simplify things to add the IPs from the old servers as aliases, at least temporarily so everything will continue to connect without changes. However, after adding the first one, I see in the logs that DHCPD is sending its DHCPACKs alternating between ens192 and ens192:0 every other time, but oddly it is always using the non-alias IP as the source every time according to tcpdump -n. Is this configuration likely to confuse anything? -- * David P. Both, RHCE Millennium Technology Consulting LLC Raleigh, NC, USA 919-389-8678 db...@millennium-technology.com www.millennium-technology.com www.databook.bz - Home of the DataBook for Linux DataBook is a Registered Trademark of David Both * This communication may be unlawfully collected and stored by the National Security Agency (NSA) in secret. The parties to this email do not consent to the retrieving or storing of this communication and any related metadata, as well as printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, or otherwise using it. If you believe you have received this communication in error, please delete it immediately. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Test. Do Not Respond
___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] About CentOS Live CD
In CentOS 7.x, two new Live CDs are introduced: CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-GnomeLive.iso and CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-KdeLive.iso My question is: is this a long term strategy? or in other words, will they be maintained in all future CentOS 7.x releases? Since CentOS 6.4 or 6.5, many system tools are removed from Live CD. That limits many use cases. I am checking that if I can rely on the new Gnome/KDE based Live CD which contains more system tools. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] This last week in CentOS
On 04/22/15 06:44, Karanbir Singh wrote: Hi, This is a summary of some of the major things going on in the project, its not a comprehensive list, but should cover most of the major traction points: Firstly, lets all welcome Brian Stinson to the fold ( http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013211.html ) -- Updates for CentOS 5/6/7 : All updates from upstream are released into the CentOS Linux mirror network. -- * Moving towards Signed Metadata ( ref: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013210.html ) * Building a downstream CentOS based Atomic Host ( ref: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013209.html ) -- Other interesting things: * The CentOS Mini Dojo in Bangalore April 2015 : http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Bangalore2015 * Fabian was speaking at Loadays a few weekends back and did a great session on Installing CentOS, Slides from his presentation are available here : http://people.centos.org/arrfab/Events/Loadays-2015/CentOS%20Install%20method%20review.pdf * CentOS Project is participating in the Google Summer of Code for the first time this year, and we have been allocated 7 slots for projects. There are some very interesting projects in the pipeline. The landing page for the ideas is at http://wiki.centos.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas - and conversation around this has been taking place in both centos-devel list and the gsoc list ( http://lists.centos.org/ ) -- Finally, I am going to try and run this weekly with a few notes from various places. Any and all help is appreciated. You can send me news to post in this at kbsingh _ centos.org. Hey Karanbir, Thanks for taking on this task. I weekly commitment to a news letter takes a significant amount of time and talent. Good on you mate! -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote: Dear All, About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore, I am extending that email to this community; where there is a larger community. Some things that we will like to achieve are as follows: SSH: disable root (uncomment 'PermitRootLogin' and change to no) enable 'strictMode' modify 'MaxAuthTries' modify 'ClientAliveInterval' modify 'ClientAliveCountMax' Gnome: disable Gnome user list Console: Remove reboot, halt poweroff from /etc/security/console.app Applying security best practises from various compliance perspective, e.g. STIG, SOX, PCI etc... We may also use NSA RHEL 5 secure configuration guide to get some insight or use it as a baseline. The members of the community who are interested in this SIG or are willing to contribute are: Leam Hall Corey Henderson Jason Pyeron You can find the post here [0] We will really like to get SIG approved by the CentOS board so if anyone is interested or willing to contribute we will be happy to have you onboard. [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013197.html These are all wicked good ideas for machines connected to the internet. I hope you also plan on making it easy to turn off these otherwise useful features for systems with no exposure to the internet. Don't make it difficult/impossible to use rsync to back up between machines on the local intranet. Rsync has to run as root to access and maintain correct file ownership and permissions. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to stagger fsck executions
On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote: I have done some what if testing. Using which tool? My simulator, or something you cooked up yourself? If the latter, would you care to share? I’ve updated mine to break out the stats for 3+ volumes instead of just reporting all multi-volume fscks together: https://gist.github.com/wyoung/7c94967bb635de48d058 Then I rewrote that in C++, since these 8-volume simulations were literally going to take days with the Perl version: https://gist.github.com/wyoung/966383b4efbb63aafc71 (The Perl version is about 1/5 the speed of the C++ one. This actually isn’t all that bad, considering that it’s an interpreted dynamically-typed language going up against a statically-typed native-code compiled language.) Using the prime numbers 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 and 31 the is a maximum of 7 incidents per year of 2 fscks per week and none for 3 or more. This is why I pointed out that you only need *relatively* prime numbers: so that if you decide the largest max-mount-count can’t be over 31, you don’t have to go clear down to 7 in order to find the last prime for 8 volumes. Using relatively-prime numbers, you can skew the set upwards quite a bit without increasing the largest value. The most efficient set I’ve been able to come up with is: 17, 19, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31 The three composite values (25, 27, and 28) do not share any common factors: 25 uses 5 twice, 27 uses 3 thrice, and 28 uses 7 plus twice 2. My newer simulators give these results for the chances of a multi-volume fsck with your prime set: period: ~6.7 billion 2-volume: 8.12% 3-volume: 1.08% 4-volume: 0.09% 5:0.01% chance total:9.3% My relatively prime improved set gives these results because the set’s median is higher while keeping the same maximum, while also avoiding any reuse of prime factors: period: ~126.2 billion 2-volume: 0.37% 3-volume: 0.33% 4-volume: 0.02% 5:0.01% chance total:0.7% See? Number theory *is* useful in real life. :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hostname on centos 7.1
Just to clarify... I have just tested the immediate change taking effect, after reading the page listed in the other reply. For some reason I was able to see immediate change on my vms, however, now that I try it on the Host, it does not persist. So maybe when I was setting things up, I actually flashed the vms. (I can't remember, but the change was done, and I immediately typed `hostname` and it appeared to have taken immediate effect. However, this is not the norm, as I have just discovered.) Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth - Original Message - From: Martes mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net To: centos centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:28:06 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] hostname on centos 7.1 Greetings everyone. I have some CentOS 7 VMs running on the system for which I just made the inquiry about the kworker problem, and I was able to institute immediate change of hostname by updating the /etc/hostname file. I have network manager running on the host, as well, and it also has the name populated in this file. When I make the change in /etc/hostname, it takes immediate effect, and persists across reboots, just as with /etc/sysconfig/network prior to RHEL/CentOS 7. If my input is out of context, then I apologize for the confusion. (I have vlans attached to the gigabit Ethernet cable, which is used to service the exposed VMs, and I use the wireless adaptor for all other internet and lan usage, hence my use of network manager on the desktop being assumed to be relevant to this inquiry.) Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth - Original Message - From: Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com To: centos centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:23:26 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] hostname on centos 7.1 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 08:43:15AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: I have a file /etc/sysconfig/network and in the file is cat /etc/sysconfig/network # Created by anaconda HOSTNAME=zotac_c7.msgnet.com [root@localhost ~]# I rebooted and the prompt is still localhost ? What is the new thing in CentOS 7 to set the host name such that then the prompt is correct also? hostnamectl set-hostname --static c7.msgnet.com Without the static option, I think it leaves out the periods in the name. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hostname on centos 7.1
Greetings everyone. I have some CentOS 7 VMs running on the system for which I just made the inquiry about the kworker problem, and I was able to institute immediate change of hostname by updating the /etc/hostname file. I have network manager running on the host, as well, and it also has the name populated in this file. When I make the change in /etc/hostname, it takes immediate effect, and persists across reboots, just as with /etc/sysconfig/network prior to RHEL/CentOS 7. If my input is out of context, then I apologize for the confusion. (I have vlans attached to the gigabit Ethernet cable, which is used to service the exposed VMs, and I use the wireless adaptor for all other internet and lan usage, hence my use of network manager on the desktop being assumed to be relevant to this inquiry.) Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth - Original Message - From: Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com To: centos centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:23:26 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] hostname on centos 7.1 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 08:43:15AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: I have a file /etc/sysconfig/network and in the file is cat /etc/sysconfig/network # Created by anaconda HOSTNAME=zotac_c7.msgnet.com [root@localhost ~]# I rebooted and the prompt is still localhost ? What is the new thing in CentOS 7 to set the host name such that then the prompt is correct also? hostnamectl set-hostname --static c7.msgnet.com Without the static option, I think it leaves out the periods in the name. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] IP aliases for services (including dhcpd)?
On 2015-04-22 3:57 pm, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, David Both db...@millennium-technology.com wrote: Yes confusion will abound. There should only ever be one and only one DHCP server on any network. With two you will sooner of later have multiple DHCP client hosts with the same IP addresses. No, it's not going to give out duplicate IPs. The dual servers are configured as primary/secondary and know about each other with some protocol to track what leases are already out. https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00502/0/A-Basic-Guide-to-Configuring-DHCP-Failover.html My question is just about multiple IPs as aliases on the server side. So far it looks like it is always sending with the same source IP even though it logs that it used the alias interface name. I'm just wondering if it would confuse clients if it gets an IP from one source and subsequent ACKs from another. But, I guess that has been happening for a long time already with the dual server setup. This is normal behavior. When you have multiple IPs aliased on a system, they all answer for inbound, but the outbound traffic always shows the primary system IP as the source. You might be able to finagle some sort of firewall SNAT rules to fake it, but I've never tried that, so I can't vouch for the viability of such a notion. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever just stops by to say 'hi' anymore. --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: apply also ideas from this document: https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130 that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
SELinux? On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: apply also ideas from this document: https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130 that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
Sounds like a bit basic stuff? How about hardening ciphers, two factor authentication, snort, web application firewall and scap scanning? Eero 22.4.2015 10.14 ap. Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com kirjoitti: SELinux? On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: apply also ideas from this document: https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130 that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SIG - Hardening
I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.) The examples of the opener show this. Something else could be integrity checking possibly. I imagine a tool/script that could apply hardening stuff. Regards Tim Am 22. April 2015 09:23:52 MESZ, schrieb Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: Sounds like a bit basic stuff? How about hardening ciphers, two factor authentication, snort, web application firewall and scap scanning? Eero 22.4.2015 10.14 ap. Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com kirjoitti: SELinux? On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: apply also ideas from this document: https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130 that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0867 Important CentOS 6 qemu-kvm Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0867 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0867.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f1b2ea595fd1df5cd0b5031ad6389073912cb4d175f094d32c887a79d7b2721e
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
e277198df13167b1a279608f309968cbeea3b7813b56b3a039a5f8296fb0b535
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm
a755460458bfd8ebb0c0e894b7caf5c2d94390ce96051cb2d815fb15162d7f28
qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm
a008fe54259159fe522e512c52ab1aa662d318f1b2eb003b30cb01209d3b
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm
8193a3930e0f9f96b1e5cea4e42a3d537092c039f0117e30c6d5313faff17a3e
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d8f563e6ebe7ccb31b6ce0ac6490b0496ae0b50967a105380dd930a4d7606add
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.448.el6_6.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0864 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0864 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0864.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
31b24c742e30d03eef068ac51f1ca07f5c3a02c4f4a988b4519a533b7dfb8c71
kernel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
06a5262def11bbeee0572101b4b4243c5a31a55a4f45ea33f9ebbfa6cde30bc9
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.noarch.rpm
8077fb249341e2a249345846384ad3d91916845ad0bd8a8ea4529ddf135bc59e
kernel-debug-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
536ab05730074c92af1fbfdc5da7c21830637199c1aba53bcf760ddb3297adb4
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
c04ee8bffa8b5165ca9695b43c57ee1f95916a229fa1aeddfc3a084fb8d26826
kernel-devel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
3a5fec20c360b962eb6899bbafbad30fd135badfdf90b77276eb0f794254c97f
kernel-doc-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.noarch.rpm
b0914773e170bcb9ea774e5061356d811517a4e1ee5a7857d8dd411072a62104
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.noarch.rpm
b74f7eb051545a2abd7a27c887b0d5e8484530b6f60b7fde60ad97db295631d9
kernel-headers-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
bd45c211850f79ebf492917bcc2d783ae7f50b85f55709febb7d68a58d53beec
perf-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
52b754590496e9624ccca4c74072df64a0c0e5bfc67bc0fb295cd1716585cacd
python-perf-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
9ca93dc7a0f0241828f5741e9dad3e5f8a76a2a4ae651fe667069c9870c269fa
kernel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
06a5262def11bbeee0572101b4b4243c5a31a55a4f45ea33f9ebbfa6cde30bc9
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.noarch.rpm
b01274ee4dbb1a15246a0009ebfbd7f71bd82f8d52e171ebf5fec38e81b42c9c
kernel-debug-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
23ed9a596107aff6ee765973d7c712649d6a7d1edd273de4d580afe3164fd61d
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
57728d7d7d067cd724b055e023ed89e93619a0029eb252588242400cbda486cb
kernel-devel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
3a5fec20c360b962eb6899bbafbad30fd135badfdf90b77276eb0f794254c97f
kernel-doc-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.noarch.rpm
b0914773e170bcb9ea774e5061356d811517a4e1ee5a7857d8dd411072a62104
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.noarch.rpm
96b5e16c3489f088748889d18d16f1f813aaee1cc98dc9455b4068cb52943c9c
kernel-headers-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
04510214dd0ed77628cbc24a2787692422e953ba83329cdbfcf397f410667557
perf-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
715a06476e838580ddbefa8321e683f26f37dbfedba61e019928a84cb548d0ba
python-perf-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
702f6044ee3d062f68de8dbc71eca0ca0ef000efd6a8cb9951beddb3d507e382
kernel-2.6.32-504.16.2.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS] This last week in CentOS
Hi, This is a summary of some of the major things going on in the project, its not a comprehensive list, but should cover most of the major traction points: Firstly, lets all welcome Brian Stinson to the fold ( http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013211.html ) -- Updates for CentOS 5/6/7 : All updates from upstream are released into the CentOS Linux mirror network. -- * Moving towards Signed Metadata ( ref: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013210.html ) * Building a downstream CentOS based Atomic Host ( ref: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013209.html ) -- Other interesting things: * The CentOS Mini Dojo in Bangalore April 2015 : http://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Bangalore2015 * Fabian was speaking at Loadays a few weekends back and did a great session on Installing CentOS, Slides from his presentation are available here : http://people.centos.org/arrfab/Events/Loadays-2015/CentOS%20Install%20method%20review.pdf * CentOS Project is participating in the Google Summer of Code for the first time this year, and we have been allocated 7 slots for projects. There are some very interesting projects in the pipeline. The landing page for the ideas is at http://wiki.centos.org/GSoC/2015/Ideas - and conversation around this has been taking place in both centos-devel list and the gsoc list ( http://lists.centos.org/ ) -- Finally, I am going to try and run this weekly with a few notes from various places. Any and all help is appreciated. You can send me news to post in this at kbsingh _ centos.org. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 122, Issue 11
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEEA-2015:0861 CentOS 6 crash Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2015:0863 Moderate CentOS 6 glibc Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2015:0867 Important CentOS 6 qemu-kvmSecurity Update
(Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2015:0864 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:27:48 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2015:0861 CentOS 6 crash Enhancement
Update
Message-ID: 20150421122748.ga22...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0861
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0861.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
ae89791d574db4089e8c1039db89b9e2b5e29db15572b0645ffd8a62cae98fb7
crash-6.1.0-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
78992043643824307b96c8a2bcb295df654021bc5b8b61d3fd4787eb7f44a500
crash-devel-6.1.0-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
361ffa189ab96f88aa4cad846fd43d3cf47c12bd34e48c4574de7335c84f5272
crash-6.1.0-6.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
78992043643824307b96c8a2bcb295df654021bc5b8b61d3fd4787eb7f44a500
crash-devel-6.1.0-6.el6_6.i686.rpm
956bef581cf42896917d34642ee52b88414ae9bd3036d6d3dfb13cabb3e983be
crash-devel-6.1.0-6.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ff598be0b6c6ccc5321d76cf28040cdb23d3f862cd0a3085fb8bd39df455b76f
crash-6.1.0-6.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:07:39 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0863 Moderate CentOS 6 glibc
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: 20150421130739.ga23...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0863 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0863.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
88b30b9049a6e88898b2e3f43927137c710ecbd50c41f2bdbb41315219a3ff54
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
892286a3246e0902d3ec52e456d546fc7b52b69b1287280fbf814e76da61c24e
glibc-common-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
9e0f2408fdc81b300fb1b3024134091c207e4549ff30df20589d27b53d48ed9b
glibc-devel-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
728c91fc9775209d89b50ab0cbc54aebc3782c70ebf5a8f8aba472d31b3aa098
glibc-headers-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
e3175defb27fdfed0f1d069b557eb4bc397fde08819e6fbc91def82f363ede64
glibc-static-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
f1abc2be2e57a7c83fd44b89baf9e8b2c2c5e742e736baae3731fc8a817ef58c
glibc-utils-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
19c66618274bb5b9b492fec2386e4be04677a1692ddc6de9fe7e231bb7b00ffd
nscd-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
x86_64:
88b30b9049a6e88898b2e3f43927137c710ecbd50c41f2bdbb41315219a3ff54
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
93e1b271cefb124042e6e268f8c1fa659827cb22afa8f5fa13b87ebbf378a603
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
d87d7e50b86050a97d4edc6047784ac979c102ab6c65027f740b04ed7216b4ea
glibc-common-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
9e0f2408fdc81b300fb1b3024134091c207e4549ff30df20589d27b53d48ed9b
glibc-devel-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
a1807441d3603faa89fa1250cbd161fb402419c0344c30f6de7818423d8e483a
glibc-devel-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
bf01eeb6d972b32e0a028077d548f6b9f5113397977ca38185b64aa8a44ed972
glibc-headers-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
e3175defb27fdfed0f1d069b557eb4bc397fde08819e6fbc91def82f363ede64
glibc-static-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
b4dba15e4838741f77dcb6b771e3eee19c46a6588f1e36450df5fde0e162a9d6
glibc-static-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
00edf45c654d9297a3ee2c982dfbcc81a1d96ec83c01c8fae6e872346724c439
glibc-utils-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
20211d194910ffc33a88d4f2d0d2e4076d702c63108bf180e88615e5f5b0b19c
nscd-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e2f2b6a6fb6cd948561a3b434835bede80a9cfc997f6974e2509355c5ebf4f4e
glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:45:47 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
