Re: [CentOS] I want to connect to a l2tp server from centos.

[Eliezer Croitoru]

OK So i took the time and finally built a RPM for the softether vpn 
server and client.
I have not tested them for usage but I found out that only the server 
side can work with multiple protocols while the client side works only 
with one protocol.

The actual protocol is called "ethernet overl HTTPS".
More info on the product:
http://www.softether.org/

The gui is only for windows as far as I could understand.

So no l2tp client there but aleast a nice VPN service.

SRPM can be found here:
http://ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/7/SRPMS/softethervpn-4.18.9570-2.el7.centos.src.rpm

The repo is here(also latest squid-cache repo):
http://ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/7/x86_64/

Eliezer

On 18/09/2015 04:33, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:

Hey John,

I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel
but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp.
This is the reason I am asking.
I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in
terms of VPN Client and Server.
At:
http://www.softether-download.com/en.aspx

But yet to try it.
Also they have all sorts of beta versions but not something they call
stable in their downloads.

I think I will try to use their product if I will not find an example on
how to use l2tp without ipsec encryption.

Thanks,
Eliezer

On 18/09/2015 03:00, John R Pierce wrote:

On 9/17/2015 4:47 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:

I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server.
This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp
connections.
The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all.


PPTP doesn't use ipsec either, it uses its own MPPE encryption based on
RC4, which is considered insecure as of years ago.

L2TP is normally used within another encrypted transport.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-virt] Official openvswitch package for CentOS7

[Sandro Bonazzola]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez 
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap  wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez 
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>  Exists an official openvswitch package for CentoS7?? If I am not
> wrong, this:
> >>
> >>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm
> >>
> >> it can be used with openstack only.
> >>
> >> Do I need to recompile from source like is is explained here:
> >>
> https://n40lab.wordpress.com/2015/06/28/centos-7-installing-openvswitch-2-3-2-lts/
> >> or exists another rpm package for CentOS7??
> >
> > Since you're sending this to centos-virt, I assume you want to use
> > openvswitch for virtualization?
>
> Correct, I will need to use for virtualization. In my case, only for
> KVM. I don't use LXC or Docker.
>
> And in my opinion, I think it could be a great idea.
>

Alan what do you think? Should we move openvswitch from cloud/openstack to
virt/kvm-common ?



>
> Thanks.
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>



-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS] BackupPC is not easy to setup

[Timothy Murphy]

Bowie Bailey wrote:

> On 9/18/2015 8:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:

>> Incidentally, I've been running BackupPC on my CentOS-7 server
> The GUI config editor is just an alternative to hand editing.  It uses
> the exact same files.
> 
> Keep in mind that the config files are stored separately from the
> backups.  On my system, the backups are under /data/BackupPC and the
> config files are under /etc/BackupPC.

You are quite right.
The info about directories to backup is in the file
/etc/BackupPC/pc/helen.pl .
I had been looking for a file called config.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] BackupPC is not easy to setup

[Timothy Murphy]

Bowie Bailey wrote:

> On 9/13/2015 10:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>> I take it then that there is no CLI method
>> of setting up and running BackupPC ?
> 
> Sure there is.  All of the configuration is stored in text config
> files.  There is a main config file for global options and each host has
> a config file in it's own directory.

Yes, it was pointed out to me that there are instructions in

in Step-7:-Talking-to-BackupPC.
I note that these instructions end by advising the user not to follow them,
but to set up the GUI method.

Incidentally, I've been running BackupPC on my CentOS-7 server
for about a week now, and I notice that no config file is created
in /var/lib/BackupPC/pc/helen, where helen is the host-name.
It seems the GUI method stores the config file somewhere else.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is ATRPMs dead?

[Cal Sawyer]

Thanks to Earl for the NUX repo recommendation.  Good VLC and ffmpeg 
versions (for CentOS) here.


From what i can tell, atrpms died a death earlier this year or the end 
of last


cheers

- cal sawyer

Earl A Ramirez  wrote:

To: CentOS mailing list 
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is ATRPMs dead?


On 14 Sep 2015 14:12, "Cal Sawyer"  wrote:

Haven't been able to reach atrpms.net for over a week from London, UK,

when i last looked for it after a couple of intervening months. Did i miss
something?

And if atrpms is truly defunct, where's a good place to obtain updated

versions of vlc and mplayer now?

thanks!

- cal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Have never used ATRPMS but a good alternative for at least VLC is Nux repo;
I have been using it since EL 6 and it works just as good on EL 7.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-virt] Official openvswitch package for CentOS7

[George Dunlap]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Sandro Bonazzola  wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez 
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap  wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez 
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >>  Exists an official openvswitch package for CentoS7?? If I am not
>> >> wrong, this:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm
>> >>
>> >> it can be used with openstack only.
>> >>
>> >> Do I need to recompile from source like is is explained here:
>> >>
>> >> https://n40lab.wordpress.com/2015/06/28/centos-7-installing-openvswitch-2-3-2-lts/
>> >> or exists another rpm package for CentOS7??
>> >
>> > Since you're sending this to centos-virt, I assume you want to use
>> > openvswitch for virtualization?
>>
>> Correct, I will need to use for virtualization. In my case, only for
>> KVM. I don't use LXC or Docker.
>>
>> And in my opinion, I think it could be a great idea.
>
>
> Alan what do you think? Should we move openvswitch from cloud/openstack to
> virt/kvm-common ?

Since Xen users may want it too, it should probably have its own repo
(so that both virt/kvm and virt/xen can use it).

 -George
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: Nux VLC gives CLI only on CentOS-6.x

[Scott Robbins]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:00:19PM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >
> >I install the nux repo vlc-core and vlc-extras.  I then try to start it
> >from a command line.  I get
> >+++
> >main interface error: no suitable interface module
> >[0x1ae5108] main libvlc error: interface "globalhotkeys,none"
> >initialization failed
> >[0x1ae5108] main libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use 'cvlc'
> >to use vlc without interface.
> >[0x1bac2b8] [cli] lua interface: Listening on host "*console".
> >VLC media player 2.0.8 Twoflower
> >Command Line Interface initialized. Type `help' for help.
> >+++
> try to install the packge "vlc" as well (I have
> vlc-2.0.8-3.el6.nux.x86_64 currently, I get the GUI)
> 

Interesting--when I search for vlc, there's no vlc package available.
However, if I go to the nux repo and look in packages, the same place where
I got vloc-core, I assume, I see it.  So, downloaded it, running yum
against it didn't work, but doing rpm -ivh installed it.  And, as you said,
I now have the GUI interface.  I wonder why it doesn't show as available
when I do yum search?  That is, I see vlc-core, vlc-debug and so on.  Once
I've installed the rpm, it does show up in yum search, but prior to it
being installed, it doesn't.

At any rate, your solution fixed my issue, thank you.


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] BackupPC is not easy to setup

[Bowie Bailey]

On 9/18/2015 8:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:

Bowie Bailey wrote:


On 9/13/2015 10:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:

I take it then that there is no CLI method
of setting up and running BackupPC ?

Sure there is.  All of the configuration is stored in text config
files.  There is a main config file for global options and each host has
a config file in it's own directory.

Yes, it was pointed out to me that there are instructions in

in Step-7:-Talking-to-BackupPC.
I note that these instructions end by advising the user not to follow them,
but to set up the GUI method.

Incidentally, I've been running BackupPC on my CentOS-7 server
for about a week now, and I notice that no config file is created
in /var/lib/BackupPC/pc/helen, where helen is the host-name.
It seems the GUI method stores the config file somewhere else.


The GUI config editor is just an alternative to hand editing.  It uses 
the exact same files.


Keep in mind that the config files are stored separately from the 
backups.  On my system, the backups are under /data/BackupPC and the 
config files are under /etc/BackupPC.


--
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] I want to connect to a l2tp server from centos.

[Richard Zimmerman]

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
Eliezer Croitoru
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 2:21 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] I want to connect to a l2tp server from centos.

http://www.softether.org/>

   For what it's worth, it runs just fine downloading and running it directly. 
I will agree, they usually only release beta versions so we hang back one or 
two beta's from the latest. In my case SoftEther VPN "just works". I will say 
if you are new to VPN's as I was (and still learning) it'll drive you nuts at 
times setting things up to make it all mesh together. Router tables, firewall 
rules, etc. Once your golden, you can literally forget how it works. Yup, took 
plenty of notes. (Hopefully they are good enough :) )

   We have a remote office and my home lan VPN'd into the server (All CentOS 
6.7 boxen) on a virtual hub. My remote users (Windows only so far) VPN in on a 
separate virtual hub and so far it has gone well. Kudos to SoftEther VPN for a 
double click to start, double click to stop a VPN connection in Windows!

   I also wrote a script to setup the tap interfaces, routing table entries and 
do several test pings to make sure the links setup correctly. This was done 
because softEther VPN would be ready to go before the TAP interfaces were up 
and ready and caused issues.

   My smartphone users can connect via l2tp/IPsec but no one (including me) 
wants to mess with it. It would be really nice if the SoftEther VPN folks would 
write a smartphone client. 



   Yes the GUI is Windows only (as far as I know) but works well no matter what 
platform the server is running well.




   Because my employer has AT Fiber/PNT/firewall/VPN services (read software 
defined networking) I'm actually happy my main support is SSL-VPN (via https) 
Makes my life a lot easier. It's to the point our company has decided NOT to 
use the AT global network client in favor of SoftEther VPN for our remote 
needs.

Kind regards,

Richard



SRPM can be found here:
http://ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/7/SRPMS/softethervpn-4.18.9570-2.el7.centos.src.rpm

The repo is here(also latest squid-cache repo):
http://ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/7/x86_64/

Eliezer





---
Richard Zimmerman
Systems / Network Administrator
River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc.
 S Main Street
South Bend, IN   46601-3337
(574) 233-1133
(574) 280-7284 Fax

On 18/09/2015 04:33, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Hey John,
>
> I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel 
> but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp.
> This is the reason I am asking.
> I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in 
> terms of VPN Client and Server.
> At:
> http://www.softether-download.com/en.aspx
>
> But yet to try it.
> Also they have all sorts of beta versions but not something they call 
> stable in their downloads.
>
> I think I will try to use their product if I will not find an example 
> on how to use l2tp without ipsec encryption.
>
> Thanks,
> Eliezer
>
> On 18/09/2015 03:00, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 9/17/2015 4:47 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>>> I have a server currently connecting to a pptp remote server.
>>> This server(lns\lac) has the option for pptp connections and l2tp 
>>> connections.
>>> The l2tp connections are not using ipsec encryption at all.
>>
>> PPTP doesn't use ipsec either, it uses its own MPPE encryption based 
>> on RC4, which is considered insecure as of years ago.
>>
>> L2TP is normally used within another encrypted transport.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Nux VLC gives CLI only on CentOS-6.x

[Scott Robbins]

I thought this was just because of various unwise repo mixing that I'd done
on my main home server-cum-workstation, but I've been able to duplicate it
on a fresh VirtualBox installation.

I install the nux repo vlc-core and vlc-extras.  I then try to start it
from a command line.  I get 
+++
main interface error: no suitable interface module
[0x1ae5108] main libvlc error: interface "globalhotkeys,none"
initialization failed
[0x1ae5108] main libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use 'cvlc'
to use vlc without interface.
[0x1bac2b8] [cli] lua interface: Listening on host "*console".
VLC media player 2.0.8 Twoflower
Command Line Interface initialized. Type `help' for help.
+++

I can open any media file with it, but I can't get the usual GUI interface.
I tend to use mplayer and smplayer more often, but I've not been able to
find the reason for this not working.  Googling has brought me some Ubuntu
issues that were resolved with reinstalling, but the only thing I've seen
with CentOS-6.x and this is a few years old.  

Does anyone else have this issue?  I use openbox or dwm on the machines,
I'm not sure if that's part of the issue.


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Nux VLC gives CLI only on CentOS-6.x

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:

I thought this was just because of various unwise repo mixing that I'd done
on my main home server-cum-workstation, but I've been able to duplicate it
on a fresh VirtualBox installation.

I install the nux repo vlc-core and vlc-extras.  I then try to start it
from a command line.  I get
+++
main interface error: no suitable interface module
[0x1ae5108] main libvlc error: interface "globalhotkeys,none"
initialization failed
[0x1ae5108] main libvlc: Running vlc with the default interface. Use 'cvlc'
to use vlc without interface.
[0x1bac2b8] [cli] lua interface: Listening on host "*console".
VLC media player 2.0.8 Twoflower
Command Line Interface initialized. Type `help' for help.
+++

I can open any media file with it, but I can't get the usual GUI interface.
I tend to use mplayer and smplayer more often, but I've not been able to
find the reason for this not working.  Googling has brought me some Ubuntu
issues that were resolved with reinstalling, but the only thing I've seen
with CentOS-6.x and this is a few years old.

Does anyone else have this issue?  I use openbox or dwm on the machines,
I'm not sure if that's part of the issue.


try to install the packge "vlc" as well (I have 
vlc-2.0.8-3.el6.nux.x86_64 currently, I get the GUI)




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-6 Logwatch 7.3.6 behaviour

[James B. Byrne]

After some experimenting I have observed that overriding settings from
/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf in
/etc/logwatch/conf/logwatch.conf does not produce consistent results.


For example, if I replace the default detail configuration in
etc/logwatch/conf/logwatch.conf with:

Detail = High

It does indeed change the level of detail from the default Low set in
/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf.

However, if I comment out the line:

#Service = "-zz-sys" # Prevents execution of zz-sys service

in the overridden file then the fact that this line remains in the
default.conf version means that the sservice cannot be enabled to run
by default without editing
/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf.  Of course doing that
means that any update clobbers the local changes.

I am not sure if this a bug or a design feature but it seems to me
that on should be able to override all of the default settings for
services.

The only way around this seems to be to specify '--service All' on the
command line.  But then the service entries in logwatch.conf seem to
be ignored entirely so that one must also specify the service
exclusions on the command line.

I also ran across a rather bizarre 'feature' with the 'DisplayOrder'
setting.  Evidently, if one gives the same DisplayOrder value to two
or more services (say zz-sys which has DisplayOrder = 0.4 and
zz-runtime which uses the default value of 0.5 otherwise) then only
the last service (ordered alphabetically) is reported.  No errors are
logged or conflict notices are given either.  The other service
reports just 'disappear'.  However, one can explicitly assign multiple
services a DisplayOrder value of 0.5 and all are reported nonetheless,
in alphabetic order, along with the other services which simply take
the implicit default value.

-- 
***  e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-virt] Official openvswitch package for CentOS7

[George Dunlap]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Alan Pevec  wrote:
>>> Alan what do you think? Should we move openvswitch from cloud/openstack to
>>> virt/kvm-common ?
>>
>> Since Xen users may want it too, it should probably have its own repo
>> (so that both virt/kvm and virt/xen can use it).
>
> Yeah, is there virt/common ?

If not, there definitely should be. :-)

I'm actually not working today -- Sandro and Alan, let's sync up over
e-mail on Monday (and/or at the Virt SIG meeting on IRC on Tuesday).

 -George
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

Re: [CentOS-virt] Official openvswitch package for CentOS7

[C. L. Martinez]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Sandro Bonazzola  wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:36 PM, George Dunlap  wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Sandro Bonazzola 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez
>> >> > 
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  Exists an official openvswitch package for CentoS7?? If I am not
>> >> >> wrong, this:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm
>> >> >>
>> >> >> it can be used with openstack only.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Do I need to recompile from source like is is explained here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://n40lab.wordpress.com/2015/06/28/centos-7-installing-openvswitch-2-3-2-lts/
>> >> >> or exists another rpm package for CentOS7??
>> >> >
>> >> > Since you're sending this to centos-virt, I assume you want to use
>> >> > openvswitch for virtualization?
>> >>
>> >> Correct, I will need to use for virtualization. In my case, only for
>> >> KVM. I don't use LXC or Docker.
>> >>
>> >> And in my opinion, I think it could be a great idea.
>> >
>> >
>> > Alan what do you think? Should we move openvswitch from cloud/openstack
>> > to
>> > virt/kvm-common ?
>>
>> Since Xen users may want it too, it should probably have its own repo
>> (so that both virt/kvm and virt/xen can use it).
>
>
> fine for me
>
>

Many thanks
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[CentOS] edac-util, lables.db

[m . roth]

Does anyone know of a source of edac labels? The one that gets installed
is tiny, and doesn't for example, have anything for Dell.

   mark



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-virt] Official openvswitch package for CentOS7

[Sandro Bonazzola]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:36 PM, George Dunlap  wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Sandro Bonazzola 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:15 PM, C. L. Martinez 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 6:06 PM, George Dunlap 
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, C. L. Martinez  >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >>  Exists an official openvswitch package for CentoS7?? If I am not
> >> >> wrong, this:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-kilo/openstack-neutron-openvswitch-2015.1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm
> >> >>
> >> >> it can be used with openstack only.
> >> >>
> >> >> Do I need to recompile from source like is is explained here:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> https://n40lab.wordpress.com/2015/06/28/centos-7-installing-openvswitch-2-3-2-lts/
> >> >> or exists another rpm package for CentOS7??
> >> >
> >> > Since you're sending this to centos-virt, I assume you want to use
> >> > openvswitch for virtualization?
> >>
> >> Correct, I will need to use for virtualization. In my case, only for
> >> KVM. I don't use LXC or Docker.
> >>
> >> And in my opinion, I think it could be a great idea.
> >
> >
> > Alan what do you think? Should we move openvswitch from cloud/openstack
> to
> > virt/kvm-common ?
>
> Since Xen users may want it too, it should probably have its own repo
> (so that both virt/kvm and virt/xen can use it).
>

fine for me



>
>  -George
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>



-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt