Re: [CentOS] Grub Prompt

2017-04-21 Thread Allan E. Registos 
Hi list,

Please pardon and forgive my post, the issue was resolved. It is due to the 
VMWare's snapshot manager, it uses the snapshot disk instead of the real disk 
that was somehow removed.

Thank you,
-Allan

- Original Message -
| From: "allan registos" 
| To: "centos" 
| Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2017 9:00:13 AM
| Subject: [CentOS] Grub Prompt

| Hi list,
| 
| Good day to you all,
| 
| Please correct me if this is the right list for posting this problem I am 
having
| with CentOS, but here is the details of the problem:
| 
| I have a VMware guest running under Centos 6.5/64-bit. I rarely rebooted this
| OS, and was using it as my backend for some of my applications, like the
| A.R.T.(BI tool) and a PostgreSQL server.
| 
| 
| "But I was not unable to start the server because it now default to the grub
| prompt, here is what it look like:
| 
| 
| GNU GRUB version 0.97 (638K lower / 3143616K upper memory)
| 
| [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists
| possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions
| of a device/filename.]
| 
| grub> _ "
| 
| I search google but the solutions provided does not solve this issue.
| 
| Thank you,
| Allan
| ___
| CentOS mailing list
| CentOS@centos.org
| https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Grub Prompt

2017-04-21 Thread Allan E. Registos 
Hi list, 

Good day to you all, 

Please correct me if this is the right list for posting this problem I am 
having with CentOS, but here is the details of the problem: 

I have a VMware guest running under Centos 6.5/64-bit. I rarely rebooted this 
OS, and was using it as my backend for some of my applications, like the 
A.R.T.(BI tool) and a PostgreSQL server. 


"But I was not unable to start the server because it now default to the grub 
prompt, here is what it look like: 


GNU GRUB version 0.97 (638K lower / 3143616K upper memory) 

[ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists 
possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions 
of a device/filename.] 

grub> _ " 

I search google but the solutions provided does not solve this issue. 

Thank you, 
Allan 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] nameserver issue

2017-04-21 Thread Fred Smith 
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:34:29AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:10 AM -0400 Fred Smith
>  wrote:
> 
> >problem is, where is it getting the old address from? It isn't in
> >the resolv.conf before the vpn is started, and it is not in the NM
> >setups, anywhere, and it isn't in any of the files in
> >/etc/sysconfig/network*, so where is it coming from? And that particular
> >system is NOT using DHCP. Beats me!
> 
> Good question. Could systemd be involved? I found this bug:
> 
> 

I'll take a look at that, thanks.

I also have more info...

My router is stupid. apparently it sends to the dhcp clients the
nameserver address you enter into the dhcp configs, but it appends
its own LAN address to it so the clients get both:

https://www.snbforums.com/threads/dns-problems-with-dhcp.23132/#post-319233
that is a discussion of a similar router from the same mfg as mine, and
it behaves the same way.

You can see this directly if you have a windows system, run "ipconfig /renew"
then "ipconfig /all" and you'll see both addresses listed as DNS.

Now, does that have anything to do with my Centos box which is
manually configured? I can't see how, but it makes me wonder.


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
  it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart."  
 Hebrews 4:12 (niv) --
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How to PXE kickstart hosts with little memory (Error: "Warning: /dev/root does not exist")?

2017-04-21 Thread Gordon Messmer 

On 04/21/2017 12:49 PM, Frank Thommen wrote:


It seems, that this is not related to local disk space - as I initally 
thought - but to too small memory.  It only happens with VMs with 
little RAM (1024 MB).  As soon as we raise the available memory to 
2048 MB, kickstarting works fine.  The RHEL 7 installation guide 
states, that the minimal memory requirement is 1 GB, so the network 
installation /should/ work.


Yeah, I filed a bug report against the documentation some time ago.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410948

...though bugzilla is currently down.

Is there a way to install such hosts w/o having to temporarily raise 
the available memory? 



None that I'm aware of, as of 7.3.  If you have a 7.2 install tree, you 
can boot the older installer and then update the installed system.  
Seems easier to boost the memory, typically.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] How to PXE kickstart hosts with little memory (Error: "Warning: /dev/root does not exist")?

2017-04-21 Thread Frank Thommen 

Hi,

while kickstarting our virtual machines with PXE we often run into 
kickstart/anaconda failing with



[...]
[...] dracut-mount[xxx]: Warning: Can't mount root filesystem
[...] dracut-mount[xxx]: Warning: /dev/root does not exist
[...] dracut-mount[xxx]:/lib/dracut-lib.sh: line 1030: echo write error: 
No space left on device

Starting Dracut Emergency Shell...
Warning: /dev/root does not exist

Generating "/run/initramfs/rsdosreport.txt"

[...]


It seems, that this is not related to local disk space - as I initally 
thought - but to too small memory.  It only happens with VMs with little 
RAM (1024 MB).  As soon as we raise the available memory to 2048 MB, 
kickstarting works fine.  The RHEL 7 installation guide states, that the 
minimal memory requirement is 1 GB, so the network installation /should/ 
work.


Is there a way to install such hosts w/o having to temporarily raise the 
available memory?


Cheers
frank


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] anaconda/kickstart: bonding device not created as expected

2017-04-21 Thread Frank Thommen 

Hi Tris,

On 04/19/2017 06:07 PM, Tris Hoar wrote:

On 18/04/2017 15:54, Frank Thommen wrote:

Hi,

I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding
device via kickstart (via PXE).

I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces.  Instead of
the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is
balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an
independent, non-bonded network device.  Also the bonding device gets
its MAC address from the second instead of from the first device.

[...]

The used PXE configuration is

LABEL CentOS-7
kernel centos-7/vmlinuz
append initrd=centos-7/initrd.img ip=dhcp nameserver=xx.xx.xx.xx
ksdevice=eno1 inst.repo=http://our.mirror.server/7/os/x86_64
inst.ks.sendmac inst.ks=http://our.kickstart.server/ks.cgi


and the network settings in the kickstart file are

network --device bond0 --bondslaves=eno1,eno2
--bondopts=mode=balance-alb --bootproto=dhcp --hostname=myhost --activate


[...]



Hi Frank,

This is from my satellite kickstart where I'm building the bond at the
point of PXE booting, and using static (I'm working on doing this with
DHCP and tagged VLANs but currently cant get to the hardware needed
since messing up the BMC config :( )

LABEL linux
KERNEL boot/RedHat-7.3-x86_64-vmlinuz
APPEND initrd=boot/RedHat-7.3-x86_64-initrd.img
ks=http://example.com/host.ks ks.device=bootif network ks.sendmac
bond=bond0:eno1,eno2:mode=802.3ad vlan=bond0.10:bond0
ip=10.10.0.2::10.10.0.1:255.255.255.0:host.example.com:bond0.10:none
nameserver=10.10.0.1


Then in the KS we have
network  --bootproto=static --device=link --gateway=10.10.0.1
--hostname=host.example.com --ip=10.10.0.2
--nameserver=10.10.0.1,10.11.0.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0

It should be fairly simple to convert that to use DHCP as you just need
to change the IP line in the kernel parameters and ensure you have
--device=link in the kickstart.

BTW cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 shows more info on how the bond is
actually setup and working.



Finally the issue was a simple and stupid syntax error in the ks config. 
 I had omitted the equal sign between "--device" and "bond0":


network --device=bond0 --bondslaves=eno1,eno2 
--bondopts=mode=balance-alb --bootproto=dhcp --hostname=myhost --activate


works much better :-).  Since the PXE config is global for all hosts 
(being configured with or without bonding device), I cannot use bonding 
definitions at that point.  However the idea of using --device=link is 
interesting and I might use it in an other context in the future.


Thanks a lot
frank


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page

2017-04-21 Thread Nicolas Kovacs 
Le 21/04/2017 à 18:44, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> Firewall open on the port... no, you said it sends some signal, since it
> prints out a blank page. And CUPS on your box is configured to understand
> the printer, right?

[Much later.]

I just spent a few unnerving hours, and I found the solution.

The printer was working all along, as it seems. The only thing that's
buggy is the "Print Test Page" button in HP-Toolbox, which produces a
blank page. All other stuff like PDF documents works fine.

Cheers,

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page

2017-04-21 Thread Nicolas Kovacs 
Le 21/04/2017 à 18:44, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> Firewall open on the port... no, you said it sends some signal, since it
> prints out a blank page. And CUPS on your box is configured to understand
> the printer, right?

I have a few sandbox machines in this office, so I experimented some
more, and here's what I found.

1. Vanilla installation of CentOS 7 + GNOME = works fine

2. Custom installation of CentOS 7 with KDE = prints blank page

So I guess the RHEL maintainers forgot a little dependency somewhere.

By the way, when I print from the KDE client, a peek in /var/log/cups/*
shows me that everything is fine, even though the printer printed a
blank page.

So... printer ejecting blank paper, CUPS thinking everything's OK, what
package might be missing?

Cheers,

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page

2017-04-21 Thread m . roth 
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 21/04/2017 à 17:32, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
>> Is there a .ppd for the printer in /etc/cups/ppd? Or is there a CUPS
>> print server on another system (we have all ours basically go through one
>> server).
>
> # ls /etc/cups/ppd/
> Officejet_Pro_8600.ppd
>
> This is a network-attached printer. All other desktop clients
> (Slackware) have CUPS + HPLIP running and can print and scan. Only the
> CentOS client refuses to work as expected.
>
Firewall open on the port... no, you said it sends some signal, since it
prints out a blank page. And CUPS on your box is configured to understand
the printer, right?

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page

2017-04-21 Thread Nicolas Kovacs 
Le 21/04/2017 à 17:32, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> Is there a .ppd for the printer in /etc/cups/ppd? Or is there a CUPS print
> server on another system (we have all ours basically go through one
> server).

# ls /etc/cups/ppd/
Officejet_Pro_8600.ppd

This is a network-attached printer. All other desktop clients
(Slackware) have CUPS + HPLIP running and can print and scan. Only the
CentOS client refuses to work as expected.

Hmmm.

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Problems With Booting CentOS on Dell T7910

2017-04-21 Thread Paul E. Virgo 



On 04/19/2017 02:12 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:

On 2017-04-18 23:29, Paul E. Virgo wrote:

Hello!

Does anyone have any experience with installing CentOS 6 (specfically,
6.8), on a Dell T7910? I've tried at least a dozen installs,
everything gets configured, and when I have the system reboot, I get
'No boot device found press any key to reboot the machine'. In BIOS,
I've enabled AHCI, Legacy boot and modes, and enabled the SAS
controller. The disks are seen and written to. It uses a MPT SAS3 RAID
controller, and I've even specified a 'diskdrive' statement pointing
to the known drivers for the controller, and still nothing. This
system is listed as compatible, but I don't know. Any suggestions or
help appreciated..



Hello,

How is the RAID configured?
it's an MPT SAS3 RAID controller, built in. All 4 disks are RAID 0; I do 
an LVM setup in my kickstart


Are you using single disk or configured multiple in RAID?

See above


Did you try to install CentOS 7.3 to verify if you'd get the same issue?

CentOS 7.3 doesn't even load. It just hangs.


Try to boot the CentOS Live and check how is/are the disk(s) presented.

//Zdenek
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--
Paul E Virgo
Sr. System Administrator
Code 610.2
SESDA III - DAAC/DISC
Goddard Space Flight Ctr/NASA
Greenbelt, MD
Greenbelt, MD 20771
(301) 614-5751

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen C6 kernel 4.9.13 and testing 4.9.15 only reboots.

2017-04-21 Thread Kevin Stange 
For some additional context, all my hardware is Supermicro and working
great on 4.9.13 - 26.  I have dom0_max_vcpus=2 because of issues I was
having with deadlocked CPU cores before setting that option on 3.18
kernels.  In my experience setting that value doesn't cause any
detriment to the dom0, which isn't doing most of the work anyway.

These are all the motherboards I'm running the kernel stably on:

Supermicro X8DT3
Supermicro X8DT6
Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF
Supermicro X9DRT
Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM

I'm on CentOS 6 across the board.

On 04/21/2017 05:01 AM, Mark L Sung wrote:
> Hu, seems there are still stability issues on the
> "4.9.2-26.el7.x86_64", recently hear many issue related to Supermicro
> board! :-(
> 
> Peace!!!
> 
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Anderson, Dave  > wrote:
> 
> Good news/bad news testing the new kernel on CentOS7 with my now
> notoriously finicky machines:
> 
> Good news: 4.9.23-26.el7 (grabbed today via yum update) isn't any
> worse than 4.9.13-22 was on my xen hosts (as far as I can tell so
> far at least)
> 
> Bad news: It isn't any better than 4.9.13 was for me either, if I
> don't set vcpu limit in the grub/xen config, it still panics like so:
> 
> [6.716016] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> [6.720199] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> [6.724046] mce: CPU supports 2 MCE banks
> [6.728239] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 8, 4MB 8
> [6.733884] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 32, 4MB 32, 1GB 0
> [6.740770] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 32K
> (821a8000 - 821b)
> [6.750638] ftrace: allocating 34344 entries in 135 pages
> [6.771888] smpboot: Max logical packages: 1
> [6.776363] VPMU disabled by hypervisor.
> [6.780479] Performance Events: SandyBridge events, PMU not
> available due to virtualization, using software events only.
> [6.792237] NMI watchdog: disabled (cpu0): hardware events not
> enabled
> [6.798943] NMI watchdog: Shutting down hard lockup detector on
> all cpus
> [6.805949] installing Xen timer for CPU 1
> [6.810659] installing Xen timer for CPU 2
> [6.815317] installing Xen timer for CPU 3
> [6.819947] installing Xen timer for CPU 4
> [6.824618] installing Xen timer for CPU 5
> [6.829282] installing Xen timer for CPU 6
> [6.833935] installing Xen timer for CPU 7
> [6.838565] installing Xen timer for CPU 8
> [6.843110] smpboot: Package 1 of CPU 8 exceeds BIOS package data 1.
> [6.849475] [ cut here ]
> [6.854091] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:997!
> [6.855864] random: fast init done
> [6.863070] invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP
> [6.867088] Modules linked in:
> [6.870168] CPU: 8 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/8 Not tainted
> 4.9.23-26.el7.x86_64 #1
> [6.877298] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRT/X9DRT, BIOS 3.2a
> 08/04/2015
> [6.883920] task: 880058a6a5c0 task.stack: c900400c
> [6.889840] RIP: e030:[]  []
> identify_secondary_cpu+0x57/0x80
> [6.898756] RSP: e02b:c900400c3f08  EFLAGS: 00010086
> [6.904069] RAX: ffe4 RBX: 88005d80a020 RCX:
> 81e5ffc8
> [6.911201] RDX: 0001 RSI: 0005 RDI:
> 0005
> [6.918335] RBP: c900400c3f18 R08: 00ce R09:
> 
> [6.925466] R10: 0005 R11: 0006 R12:
> 0008
> [6.932599] R13:  R14:  R15:
> 
> [6.939735] FS:  () GS:88005d80()
> knlGS:
> [6.947819] CS:  e033 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 80050033
> [6.953565] CR2:  CR3: 01e07000 CR4:
> 00042660
> [6.960696] Stack:
> [6.962731]  0008  c900400c3f28
> 8104ebce
> [6.970205]  c900400c3f40 81029855 
> c900400c3f50
> [6.977691]  810298d0  
> 
> [6.985164] Call Trace:
> [6.987626]  [] smp_store_cpu_info+0x3e/0x40
> [6.993480]  [] cpu_bringup+0x35/0x90
> [6.998700]  [] cpu_bringup_and_idle+0x20/0x40
> [7.004706] Code: 44 89 e7 ff 50 68 0f b7 93 d2 00 00 00 39 d0 75
> 1c 0f b7 bb da 00 00 00 44 89 e6 e8 e4 02 01 00 85 c0 75 07 5b 41 5c
> 5d c3 0f 0b <0f> 0b 0f b7 8b d4 00 00 00 89 c2 44 89 e6 48 c7 c7 90
> d3 ca 81
> [7.024976] RIP  []
> identify_secondary_cpu+0x57/0x80
> [7.031528]  RSP 
> [7.035032] ---[ end trace f2a8d75941398d9f ]---
> [7.039658] Kernel panic - not syncing:

[CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

2017-04-21 Thread Lamar Owen 
I have an application with is binary-only, does its job well, and is 
only available for either libc5 (!) or early early glibc2.0 (!!). It has 
been running on a Red Hat Linux 5.2 (NOT RHEL; RHL) server for a really 
long time, and it honestly does its job and it's not easily replaced by 
an open-source solution at the moment.


So, I need to do one of the following things:
1.) Run Red Hat Linux 5.2 (or similar vintage) on KVM on CentOS 7;
2.) Build libc5 (!) for CentOS 7 and run it on C7 (if that's even possible).

The latest version of libc5 I know of that was shipped by Red Hat is in 
RHL 6.2, libc-5.3.12.  (There is a 5.4, but not sure of stability or 
compatibility).


So, I have RHL 5.2 (Apollo) running on KVM on C7, but I'm not getting 
any networking working.  The only two non-virtio NICs are e1000 and 
rtl8139.  As I recall kernel 2.0.36 and rtl8139 were pretty iffy 
together, and e1000 drivers are not likely available (I couldn't find 
any).  The host's bridge sees the MAC of the guest, but the guest isn't 
seeing any traffic.


So, has anyone tried doing anything this old with modern kvm (I'm using 
the qemu-ev packages, incidentally)?


I've successfully set up the bridging; a CentOS 7 VM on the same host 
has full connectivity.  So it's something about the rtl8139 and the 
2.0.36 kernel.  What is the oldest distribution you've done on KVM on C7?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

2017-04-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz 

Thanks.  Good to know, and I will add this as a footnote to my howto.

I am currently, not tackling Samba.  I tried a year ago without 
success.  My current domain server is ClearOS.


On 04/21/2017 11:38 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Samba. Authentication won't work if the client and server have 
different clocks.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] softwarecollections.org

2017-04-21 Thread Chris Adams 
Once upon a time, William Warren  said:
> Who do I contact about softwarecollections being offline?  I am
> having to bypass that repo for right now and the packets disappear
> in the ether on their way..:)

http://status.fedoraproject.org/

Everything is red right now... :(
-- 
Chris Adams 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

2017-04-21 Thread Kenneth Porter 
Samba. Authentication won't work if the client and server have different 
clocks. 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page

2017-04-21 Thread m . roth 
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed CentOS 7 + KDE on a new workstation in my office. I
> tried to setup my printer, but the test page is blank. Here's some
> details.
>
> The printer is an HP OfficeJet 8600 Pro. It works perfectly with all
> other desktop clients running Slackware Linux and HPLIP.
>
> I installed hplip and hplip-gui, launched HP Toolbox and then setup the
> printer - a network printer - which is mainly a matter of confirming OK,
> OK, OK.
>
> The printer shows up OK in HP Toolbox, but when I try to print a test
> page, the printer ejects a blank page, that's it.
>
> Which leaves me clueless.
>
Is there a .ppd for the printer in /etc/cups/ppd? Or is there a CUPS print
server on another system (we have all ours basically go through one
server).

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] nameserver issue

2017-04-21 Thread Kenneth Porter 
--On Thursday, April 20, 2017 9:10 AM -0400 Fred Smith 
 wrote:



problem is, where is it getting the old address from? It isn't in
the resolv.conf before the vpn is started, and it is not in the NM
setups, anywhere, and it isn't in any of the files in
/etc/sysconfig/network*, so where is it coming from? And that particular
system is NOT using DHCP. Beats me!


Good question. Could systemd be involved? I found this bug:





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] softwarecollections.org

2017-04-21 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 04/21/2017 10:07 AM, William Warren wrote:
> Who do I contact about softwarecollections being offline?  I am having
> to bypass that repo for right now and the packets disappear in the ether
> on their way..:)

There is currently a datacenter issue in one of the RH locations that
serves both Fedora and CentOS infrastructure.  I would say that is
likely the cause
the cause.

We have enough things in a second location that this does not seem to be
hurting us too bad (CentOS) .. not sure about Fedora though.  I have
enough things to worry about WRT CentOS :)

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] softwarecollections.org

2017-04-21 Thread William Warren 
Who do I contact about softwarecollections being offline?  I am having 
to bypass that repo for right now and the packets disappear in the ether 
on their way..:)


William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 146, Issue 5

2017-04-21 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 04/21/2017 08:44 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Sorry for the noise I found it.

Thanks OK .. you can also find it in git here as well:

https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!firefox

Currently, though not always, the CentOS-7 and CentOS-6 firefox build
from the same SRPM.

> 
> On 04/21/2017 08:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Where is the source rpm for firefox-52 I can't seem to find it googling for 
>> it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Steve






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 7 + HPLIP = blank page

2017-04-21 Thread Nicolas Kovacs 
Hi,

I just installed CentOS 7 + KDE on a new workstation in my office. I
tried to setup my printer, but the test page is blank. Here's some details.

The printer is an HP OfficeJet 8600 Pro. It works perfectly with all
other desktop clients running Slackware Linux and HPLIP.

I installed hplip and hplip-gui, launched HP Toolbox and then setup the
printer - a network printer - which is mainly a matter of confirming OK,
OK, OK.

The printer shows up OK in HP Toolbox, but when I try to print a test
page, the printer ejects a blank page, that's it.

Which leaves me clueless.

Cheers,

Niki Kovacs
-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 146, Issue 5

2017-04-21 Thread Steve Clark 
Sorry for the noise I found it.

On 04/21/2017 08:56 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where is the source rpm for firefox-52 I can't seem to find it googling for 
> it.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> On 04/21/2017 08:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
>> Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
>>  centos-annou...@centos.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>  https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>  centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>  centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util  Security Update
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>2. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss Security  Update
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>3. CESA-2017:1105 Important CentOS 6 bind SecurityUpdate
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>4. CESA-2017:1104 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security  Update
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>5. CESA-2017:1109 Moderate CentOS 6   java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
>>   Update (Johnny Hughes)
>>6. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 7 nss-util  Security Update
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>7. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 7 nss Security  Update
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>8. CESA-2017:1106 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security  Update
>>   (Johnny Hughes)
>>9. CESA-2017:1108 Moderate CentOS 7   java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
>>   Update (Johnny Hughes)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:43:59 +
>> From: Johnny Hughes 
>> To: centos-annou...@centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util
>>  Security Update
>> Message-ID: <20170420224359.ga40...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>
>> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:1100 Critical
>>
>> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1100.html
>>
>> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
>> syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 
>>
>> i386:
>> 09d5ded637588ded6406eafe69a19b13d981a8bf945ada12894da1a0d21d376f  
>> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
>> fcc501f2c221dab92c66ba05ee5ad80ad5894984a5423d7db58020165cc0b45b  
>> nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
>>
>> x86_64:
>> 09d5ded637588ded6406eafe69a19b13d981a8bf945ada12894da1a0d21d376f  
>> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
>> 62d946e014cfbfb7cc657a58295a8f27b11043f2136edf91126b3ff467400c85  
>> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
>> fcc501f2c221dab92c66ba05ee5ad80ad5894984a5423d7db58020165cc0b45b  
>> nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
>> 515fd89043687a0cf6f40271d36ebfb34d27bd8304d8027e70b168d110fb81d5  
>> nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
>>
>> Source:
>> 0667ca1376b6eca9ae5b4b0c5745d5ae9801227458afe5c43fab9422908f8763  
>> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.src.rpm
>>
>>
>>
> \
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


-- 
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

2017-04-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz 



On 04/21/2017 09:25 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, 
JXVS wrote:


From: Robert Moskowitz [r...@htt-consult.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time   
set?

So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the
system time from 0 to current.

Something you might consider to make the time delta _less_ drastic, is to create a 
service which on system shutdown touches a file {in /etc/} and on boot early in the 
start-up {make some other services depend on it} checks to see if the system 
date is before the time on that file, if it is then use the time stamp {+ 
a few sec} on the file to set the current time.  That way time would at least move 
forward.

in the olden days we used to use `hwclock --badyear` mitigate part of it. 
perhaps you could extend hwclock for --dead-batteries and make it easier for 
every one  with an arm {assuming hwclock is still used in the boot process to 
pull the initial time from the clock}. :)

Even when this disclaimer is not here:
I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the 
terms of any contract.


Miroslav has been a great help over on the chronyd list.  I have learned 
to add the -s option to chronyd and point the rtcdevice to nothing so 
that the Centos version of Chronyd, 2.1.1, will read the timestamp from 
the driftfile if no ntp respose:


cat /etc/chrony.conf || exit 1
rtcdevice /dev/doesnotexist
EOF

With chronyd 2.2, you only need the "-s" option.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

2017-04-21 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, JXVS 

From: Robert Moskowitz [r...@htt-consult.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time   
set?
> 
> So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the
> system time from 0 to current.

Something you might consider to make the time delta _less_ drastic, is to 
create a service which on system shutdown touches a file {in /etc/} and on boot 
early in the start-up {make some other services depend on it} checks to see if 
the system date is before the time on that file, if it is then use the 
time stamp {+ a few sec} on the file to set the current time.  That way time 
would at least move forward.

in the olden days we used to use `hwclock --badyear` mitigate part of it. 
perhaps you could extend hwclock for --dead-batteries and make it easier for 
every one  with an arm {assuming hwclock is still used in the boot process to 
pull the initial time from the clock}. :)

Even when this disclaimer is not here:
I am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the 
terms of any contract.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 146, Issue 5

2017-04-21 Thread Steve Clark 
Hi,

Where is the source rpm for firefox-52 I can't seem to find it googling for it.

Thanks,
Steve

On 04/21/2017 08:00 AM, centos-announce-requ...@centos.org wrote:
> Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
>   centos-annou...@centos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util   Security Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>2. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss Security   Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>3. CESA-2017:1105 Important CentOS 6 bind Security Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>4. CESA-2017:1104 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security   Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>5. CESA-2017:1109 Moderate CentOS 6java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
>   Update (Johnny Hughes)
>6. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 7 nss-util   Security Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>7. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 7 nss Security   Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>8. CESA-2017:1106 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security   Update
>   (Johnny Hughes)
>9. CESA-2017:1108 Moderate CentOS 7java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
>   Update (Johnny Hughes)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:43:59 +
> From: Johnny Hughes 
> To: centos-annou...@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util
>   Security Update
> Message-ID: <20170420224359.ga40...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:1100 Critical
>
> Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1100.html
>
> The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
> syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 
>
> i386:
> 09d5ded637588ded6406eafe69a19b13d981a8bf945ada12894da1a0d21d376f  
> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
> fcc501f2c221dab92c66ba05ee5ad80ad5894984a5423d7db58020165cc0b45b  
> nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
>
> x86_64:
> 09d5ded637588ded6406eafe69a19b13d981a8bf945ada12894da1a0d21d376f  
> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
> 62d946e014cfbfb7cc657a58295a8f27b11043f2136edf91126b3ff467400c85  
> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
> fcc501f2c221dab92c66ba05ee5ad80ad5894984a5423d7db58020165cc0b45b  
> nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
> 515fd89043687a0cf6f40271d36ebfb34d27bd8304d8027e70b168d110fb81d5  
> nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
>
> Source:
> 0667ca1376b6eca9ae5b4b0c5745d5ae9801227458afe5c43fab9422908f8763  
> nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.src.rpm
>
>
>

\
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS

2017-04-21 Thread Johnny Hughes 
On 04/20/2017 09:06 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> wwp wrote:

 They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on
 EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be
 released during the next cycle.


>>> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release:
>>>
>>> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR.
>>
>> Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we
>> could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6?
> 
> Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ...
> 

Right, that version is out there now for CentOS and it installs and
passes our CI testing, here is the latest run for this firefox:

http://bit.ly/2obFsd1




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 146, Issue 5

2017-04-21 Thread centos-announce-request 
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CESA-2017:1105 Important CentOS 6 bind Security   Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CESA-2017:1104 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CESA-2017:1109 Moderate CentOS 6  java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
  Update (Johnny Hughes)
   6. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 7 nss-util Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   7. CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 7 nss Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   8. CESA-2017:1106 Critical CentOS 7 firefox Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   9. CESA-2017:1108 Moderate CentOS 7  java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
  Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:43:59 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss-util
Security Update
Message-ID: <20170420224359.ga40...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:1100 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1100.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
09d5ded637588ded6406eafe69a19b13d981a8bf945ada12894da1a0d21d376f  
nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
fcc501f2c221dab92c66ba05ee5ad80ad5894984a5423d7db58020165cc0b45b  
nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm

x86_64:
09d5ded637588ded6406eafe69a19b13d981a8bf945ada12894da1a0d21d376f  
nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
62d946e014cfbfb7cc657a58295a8f27b11043f2136edf91126b3ff467400c85  
nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
fcc501f2c221dab92c66ba05ee5ad80ad5894984a5423d7db58020165cc0b45b  
nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
515fd89043687a0cf6f40271d36ebfb34d27bd8304d8027e70b168d110fb81d5  
nss-util-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm

Source:
0667ca1376b6eca9ae5b4b0c5745d5ae9801227458afe5c43fab9422908f8763  
nss-util-3.28.4-1.el6_9.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS



--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:44:03 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2017:1100 Critical CentOS 6 nss
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20170420224403.ga41...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:1100 Critical

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1100.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
5821f235b991ffcd273006c24ca9d3e1daf4b6e3228ce7dcb97c24de5b21de41  
nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
9688f7b58816ab0192210a2ef4c138139083abcdb842ee4f5f8e89847649d610  
nss-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
67bbf48d70115e4596bba46853e35e41510e04f76916e676821e953f4abe41b3  
nss-pkcs11-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
c6e3ea1c22bfc39fd3d8872bf890acfd444b8e27342243c9310477a39e5a1b6b  
nss-sysinit-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
8e9dc735e1af62d3e6dac0c5997735e19c2e864d78d4a0050d55cf263edfe928  
nss-tools-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm

x86_64:
5821f235b991ffcd273006c24ca9d3e1daf4b6e3228ce7dcb97c24de5b21de41  
nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
a82f4e54a89d9b8923fe457130bf4e7aefc0b9d506716eb1ead0db9fa2b8714a  
nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
9688f7b58816ab0192210a2ef4c138139083abcdb842ee4f5f8e89847649d610  
nss-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
9d9721cdbb202bd30503872b8a2e80f94cd63a38aba666449fe27dda4cc616dd  
nss-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
67bbf48d70115e4596bba46853e35e41510e04f76916e676821e953f4abe41b3  
nss-pkcs11-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686.rpm
f8a915c0d9066123ac1371f559dee7acd48f506ff69e976af11952b623b35201  
nss-pkcs11-devel-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
d3d0d749646b8a0d1a198ac9dc15cfe39b0c9103055fe2d10f5db4971a6bb866  
nss-sysinit-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm
6e7a942c903ded2beadf2744a0f6ddacfd1b92e482396209358b2c4b2d691af9  
nss-tools-3.28.4-1.el6_9.x86_64.rpm

Source:
f3d57fbec19b0a79e88bedf659868d173f34a651a42313ddc600b0ce420aef47  
nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter:

Re: [CentOS-es] Bug Kernel

2017-04-21 Thread Epsilon Minus 
reenvío a la lista.. lo envié a quién me respondió.

El día 21 de abril de 2017, 8:31, Ernesto Pérez Estévez
 escribió:
> On 21/04/17 00:51, Epsilon Minus wrote:
>> Estimados,
>>
>> Tengo un problema con Samba. Parece que es un error más allá del Samba
> cual es el problema?
>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11472
>
>> Acá dice que lo resolvieron, pero no tengo mucha idea que tengo que
>> hacer con esto
>>
>
> No indicas si usas centos-7 o centos-6, supondré (no queda otro remedio)
> que es centos-7:
>
> CentOS 7 tiene la version 4.4.4 de samba:
>
> samba.x86_64  4.4.4-12.el7_3
>
> El enlace que das indica que está resuelto esde la version 4.4.0

Efectivamente, luego entendí eso. que en la versión 4.4.4 estaría resuelto.

> Podrías revisar el código fuente del rpm de centos para determinar que
> el parche está aplicado (yo supondría que sí pues es una version superior).

Estoy usando la versión que viene por repositorio. Reinstale la
aplicación así que supongo que si.


> saludos
> epe
>
>
>> Saludos.
>
> Calle La Condamine 12-109 "Casa Rivera".
> Cuenca -  Ecuador
> Telf: (593) 7405 1000 Ext. 4220/4223
> i...@cedia.org.ec
> www.cedia.org.ec


¿Alguna recomendación de que más buscar?

El día 21 de abril de 2017, 8:48, Epsilon Minus
 escribió:
> El día 21 de abril de 2017, 8:31, Ernesto Pérez Estévez
>  escribió:
>> On 21/04/17 00:51, Epsilon Minus wrote:
>>> Estimados,
>>>
>>> Tengo un problema con Samba. Parece que es un error más allá del Samba
>> cual es el problema?
>>
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11472
>>
>>> Acá dice que lo resolvieron, pero no tengo mucha idea que tengo que
>>> hacer con esto
>>>
>>
>> No indicas si usas centos-7 o centos-6, supondré (no queda otro remedio)
>> que es centos-7:
>>
>> CentOS 7 tiene la version 4.4.4 de samba:
>>
>> samba.x86_64  4.4.4-12.el7_3
>>
>> El enlace que das indica que está resuelto esde la version 4.4.0
>
> Efectivamente, luego entendí eso. que en la versión 4.4.4 estaría resuelto.
>
>> Podrías revisar el código fuente del rpm de centos para determinar que
>> el parche está aplicado (yo supondría que sí pues es una version superior).
>
> Estoy usando la versión que viene por repositorio. Reinstale la
> aplicación así que supongo que si.
>
>
>> saludos
>> epe
>>
>>
>>> Saludos.
>>
>> Calle La Condamine 12-109 "Casa Rivera".
>> Cuenca -  Ecuador
>> Telf: (593) 7405 1000 Ext. 4220/4223
>> i...@cedia.org.ec
>> www.cedia.org.ec
>
>
> ¿Alguna recomendación de que más buscar?
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen C6 kernel 4.9.13 and testing 4.9.15 only reboots.

2017-04-21 Thread Mark L Sung 
Hu, seems there are still stability issues on the
"4.9.2-26.el7.x86_64", recently hear many issue related to Supermicro
board! :-(

Peace!!!

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Anderson, Dave 
wrote:

> Good news/bad news testing the new kernel on CentOS7 with my now
> notoriously finicky machines:
>
> Good news: 4.9.23-26.el7 (grabbed today via yum update) isn't any worse
> than 4.9.13-22 was on my xen hosts (as far as I can tell so far at least)
>
> Bad news: It isn't any better than 4.9.13 was for me either, if I don't
> set vcpu limit in the grub/xen config, it still panics like so:
>
> [6.716016] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> [6.720199] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
> [6.724046] mce: CPU supports 2 MCE banks
> [6.728239] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 8, 4MB 8
> [6.733884] Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 32, 4MB 32, 1GB 0
> [6.740770] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 32K (821a8000 -
> 821b)
> [6.750638] ftrace: allocating 34344 entries in 135 pages
> [6.771888] smpboot: Max logical packages: 1
> [6.776363] VPMU disabled by hypervisor.
> [6.780479] Performance Events: SandyBridge events, PMU not available
> due to virtualization, using software events only.
> [6.792237] NMI watchdog: disabled (cpu0): hardware events not enabled
> [6.798943] NMI watchdog: Shutting down hard lockup detector on all cpus
> [6.805949] installing Xen timer for CPU 1
> [6.810659] installing Xen timer for CPU 2
> [6.815317] installing Xen timer for CPU 3
> [6.819947] installing Xen timer for CPU 4
> [6.824618] installing Xen timer for CPU 5
> [6.829282] installing Xen timer for CPU 6
> [6.833935] installing Xen timer for CPU 7
> [6.838565] installing Xen timer for CPU 8
> [6.843110] smpboot: Package 1 of CPU 8 exceeds BIOS package data 1.
> [6.849475] [ cut here ]
> [6.854091] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:997!
> [6.855864] random: fast init done
> [6.863070] invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP
> [6.867088] Modules linked in:
> [6.870168] CPU: 8 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/8 Not tainted
> 4.9.23-26.el7.x86_64 #1
> [6.877298] Hardware name: Supermicro X9DRT/X9DRT, BIOS 3.2a 08/04/2015
> [6.883920] task: 880058a6a5c0 task.stack: c900400c
> [6.889840] RIP: e030:[]  []
> identify_secondary_cpu+0x57/0x80
> [6.898756] RSP: e02b:c900400c3f08  EFLAGS: 00010086
> [6.904069] RAX: ffe4 RBX: 88005d80a020 RCX:
> 81e5ffc8
> [6.911201] RDX: 0001 RSI: 0005 RDI:
> 0005
> [6.918335] RBP: c900400c3f18 R08: 00ce R09:
> 
> [6.925466] R10: 0005 R11: 0006 R12:
> 0008
> [6.932599] R13:  R14:  R15:
> 
> [6.939735] FS:  () GS:88005d80()
> knlGS:
> [6.947819] CS:  e033 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 80050033
> [6.953565] CR2:  CR3: 01e07000 CR4:
> 00042660
> [6.960696] Stack:
> [6.962731]  0008  c900400c3f28
> 8104ebce
> [6.970205]  c900400c3f40 81029855 
> c900400c3f50
> [6.977691]  810298d0  
> 
> [6.985164] Call Trace:
> [6.987626]  [] smp_store_cpu_info+0x3e/0x40
> [6.993480]  [] cpu_bringup+0x35/0x90
> [6.998700]  [] cpu_bringup_and_idle+0x20/0x40
> [7.004706] Code: 44 89 e7 ff 50 68 0f b7 93 d2 00 00 00 39 d0 75 1c 0f
> b7 bb da 00 00 00 44 89 e6 e8 e4 02 01 00 85 c0 75 07 5b 41 5c 5d c3 0f 0b
> <0f> 0b 0f b7 8b d4 00 00 00 89 c2 44 89 e6 48 c7 c7 90 d3 ca 81
> [7.024976] RIP  [] identify_secondary_cpu+0x57/0x80
> [7.031528]  RSP 
> [7.035032] ---[ end trace f2a8d75941398d9f ]---
> [7.039658] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>
> So...other than my work around...that still works...not sure what else I
> can provide in the way of feedback/testing. But if you want anything else
> gathered, let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> -Dave
>
> --
> Dave Anderson
>
>
> > On Apr 19, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:
> >
> > On 04/19/2017 12:18 PM, PJ Welsh wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Johnny Hughes  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>On 04/18/2017 12:39 PM, PJ Welsh wrote:
> >>> Here is something interesting... I went through the BIOS options and
> >>> found that one R710 that *is* functioning only differed in that
> "Logical
> >>> Processor"/Hyperthreading was *enabled* while the one that is *not*
> >>> functioning had HT *disabled*. Enabled Logical Processor and the system
> >>> starts without issue! I've rebooted 3 times now without issue.
> >>> Dell R710 BIOS version 6.4.0
> >>> 2x