Re: [CentOS] upgrading 7.5 ==> 7.6
On 21/12/18 5:21 PM, Fred Smith wrote: On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 01:50:06PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote: hI ALL! There have been a large enough number of people posting here about difficulties when upgrading from 7. to 7.6 that I'm being somewhat paranoid about it. I have several machines to upgrade, but so far the only one I've dared to work on (least critical if it goes bad) is my new-to-me-but-used laptop. First I did a 'dd' backup of the whole drive onto an external USB drive then did the upgrade. Since I use the Mate desktop, I enabled the epel testing repo (per postings on Mate troubles at the time of the upgrade). Result: Boots to GDM just fine, but Mate is a black screen. Switching to Gnome, works fine, but I can't stand Gnome. Not knowing what else to try I restored the dd backup. Later I inserted a spare HD and did a new install from the DVD media. This installed without issue, but now no desktop works. Switching to a console (CTRL-ALT-F2) I did a full "yum update", which installed quite a few packages, but upon reboot nothing had improved. So I added the epel repo (and testing) and installed Mate. Ditto, nothing had changed. This laptop is fairly old, and according to lshw, has a RV635/M86 [Mobility Radeon HD 3650]I] video chipset, in case it matters. CPU is identified as: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz Having previously installed 7.5 on it without trouble, on which Mate works just fine, I wonder what could have become so broken that neither an upgrade nor a fresh install works. I have, as I said, several other machines to upgrade, too, some of them have Nvidia grahics (esp. my main desktop box, which also uses Linux software RAID-1) and all run Mate. Then there is a netbook (low priority) a couple of VMs (in virtualbox) and at work several other VMS as well as bare-metal on a Lenovo deskside machine, and I'm afraid to do an update on all of them because I need them to be in usable condition. The Lenovo box in my office is somewhat urgent, as I am about to retire and turn it over to someone else who doesn't know much about Linux. I'd appreciate any advice I can get on how to get these systems upgraded without breaking them. thanks in advance for your help! Fred One more data point: After taking a dd backup of the HD in my Acer Aspire One netbook (screaming 1.6 GHz Atom, dual core!!), I did the 7.5 to 7.6 update and it went perfectly fine, although it had 800 packages to update, so it was kinda slow. Do any of you know if the various Nvidia issues, and problems upgrading software RAID1 systems have reached resolution? I haven't seen postings here regarding solutions for those problems, and knowing my luck, I would hit both of 'em on my personal desktop. Thanks in advance for any response! Fred I had major issues with two machines, both with nvidia cards. I found that the SL spin of CentOS 7 has fixes for the xorg problems. Akemi Yagi posted the solution which worked fine - it was just difficult to get the required files onto the broken device with no gui. The only issue I've seen reported that sounds similar or possibly related is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650634 Yes, seems this is the laptop issue, will prove tomorrow. There is a patch in that bug you might like to try. Not too keen on this, would need to find a detailed howto as I have not done any rebuilds for a number of years. I presume that RH will at some point release a fix for this? The submitter of RHBZ 1650634 is a developer of Scientific Linux. The xorg packages in SL 7.6 have been published with the referenced patch applied. If you so wish, you could install their packages. ftp://linux1.fnal.gov/linux/scientific/7.6/x86_64/updates/security/ Note the "sl7" tag instead of "el7". Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrading 7.5 ==> 7.6
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 01:50:06PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote: >> hI ALL! >> >> There have been a large enough number of people posting here about >> difficulties when upgrading from 7. to 7.6 that I'm being somewhat >> paranoid about it. >> >> I have several machines to upgrade, but so far the only one I've dared >> to work on (least critical if it goes bad) is my new-to-me-but-used >> laptop. >> >> First I did a 'dd' backup of the whole drive onto an external USB drive >> then did the upgrade. Since I use the Mate desktop, I enabled the >> epel testing repo (per postings on Mate troubles at the time of the >> upgrade). >> >> Result: Boots to GDM just fine, but Mate is a black screen. Switching >> to Gnome, works fine, but I can't stand Gnome. Not knowing what else >> to try I restored the dd backup. >> >> Later I inserted a spare HD and did a new install from the DVD >> media. This installed without issue, but now no desktop works. >> Switching to a console (CTRL-ALT-F2) I did a full "yum update", >> which installed quite a few packages, but upon reboot nothing had >> improved. So I added the epel repo (and testing) and installed Mate. >> Ditto, nothing had changed. >> >> This laptop is fairly old, and according to lshw, has a RV635/M86 >> [Mobility Radeon HD 3650]I] video chipset, in case it matters. >> CPU is identified as: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz >> >> Having previously installed 7.5 on it without trouble, on which Mate >> works just fine, I wonder what could have become so broken that neither >> an upgrade nor a fresh install works. >> >> I have, as I said, several other machines to upgrade, too, some of them >> have Nvidia grahics (esp. my main desktop box, which also uses Linux >> software RAID-1) and all run Mate. Then there is a netbook (low >> priority) >> a couple of VMs (in virtualbox) and at work several other VMS as well as >> bare-metal on a Lenovo deskside machine, and I'm afraid to do an update >> on all of them because I need them to be in usable condition. The Lenovo >> box in my office is somewhat urgent, as I am about to retire and turn >> it over to someone else who doesn't know much about Linux. >> >> I'd appreciate any advice I can get on how to get these systems upgraded >> without breaking them. >> >> thanks in advance for your help! >> >> Fred > > One more data point: After taking a dd backup of the HD in my Acer > Aspire One netbook (screaming 1.6 GHz Atom, dual core!!), I did the > 7.5 to 7.6 update and it went perfectly fine, although it had 800 > packages to update, so it was kinda slow. > > Do any of you know if the various Nvidia issues, and problems upgrading > software RAID1 systems have reached resolution? I haven't seen postings > here regarding solutions for those problems, and knowing my luck, I would > hit both of 'em on my personal desktop. I didn't see any issues with RAID. I think those problems arise only if you have old RAID devices created with older CentOS releases than 7. Those were probably created with 0.9 metadata version which may be a problem. Currently 1.2 metadata version is created and I didn't see any issues with it. Maybe others can confirm my conclution. Regards, Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrading 7.5 ==> 7.6
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 01:50:06PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > hI ALL! > > There have been a large enough number of people posting here about > difficulties when upgrading from 7. to 7.6 that I'm being somewhat paranoid > about it. > > I have several machines to upgrade, but so far the only one I've dared > to work on (least critical if it goes bad) is my new-to-me-but-used > laptop. > > First I did a 'dd' backup of the whole drive onto an external USB drive > then did the upgrade. Since I use the Mate desktop, I enabled the > epel testing repo (per postings on Mate troubles at the time of the > upgrade). > > Result: Boots to GDM just fine, but Mate is a black screen. Switching > to Gnome, works fine, but I can't stand Gnome. Not knowing what else > to try I restored the dd backup. > > Later I inserted a spare HD and did a new install from the DVD > media. This installed without issue, but now no desktop works. > Switching to a console (CTRL-ALT-F2) I did a full "yum update", > which installed quite a few packages, but upon reboot nothing had > improved. So I added the epel repo (and testing) and installed Mate. > Ditto, nothing had changed. > > This laptop is fairly old, and according to lshw, has a RV635/M86 > [Mobility Radeon HD 3650]I] video chipset, in case it matters. > CPU is identified as: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz > > Having previously installed 7.5 on it without trouble, on which Mate > works just fine, I wonder what could have become so broken that neither > an upgrade nor a fresh install works. > > I have, as I said, several other machines to upgrade, too, some of them > have Nvidia grahics (esp. my main desktop box, which also uses Linux > software RAID-1) and all run Mate. Then there is a netbook (low priority) > a couple of VMs (in virtualbox) and at work several other VMS as well as > bare-metal on a Lenovo deskside machine, and I'm afraid to do an update > on all of them because I need them to be in usable condition. The Lenovo > box in my office is somewhat urgent, as I am about to retire and turn > it over to someone else who doesn't know much about Linux. > > I'd appreciate any advice I can get on how to get these systems upgraded > without breaking them. > > thanks in advance for your help! > > Fred One more data point: After taking a dd backup of the HD in my Acer Aspire One netbook (screaming 1.6 GHz Atom, dual core!!), I did the 7.5 to 7.6 update and it went perfectly fine, although it had 800 packages to update, so it was kinda slow. Do any of you know if the various Nvidia issues, and problems upgrading software RAID1 systems have reached resolution? I haven't seen postings here regarding solutions for those problems, and knowing my luck, I would hit both of 'em on my personal desktop. Thanks in advance for any response! Fred -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On 12/20/2018 5:18 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 12/20/18 5:11 AM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L. I run CentOS 7 but with an updated server stack, including rebuilds (sonetimes with tweaks) of Fedora packages. Gives me a stable base with modern server software. Does take some work to get some stuff built. This is what I end up doing on occasions as well, though I try to restrict it to isolated forward-compatible shared libraries rather than a full stack. Unfortunately, the Fedora folks seem hell-bent on discouraging [1] cross-distro compatibility in the name of Progress, so I don't expect direct SRPM rebuilds to halt their increasing annoyance and difficulty as time goes on. -jc [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HZNCOBZZFQ6GA2OKUJTII7D7QNLB3TE2/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 15:07, mark wrote: > > lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > > On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: > > > >> lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > >>> hi guys > >>> > >>> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than > >>> only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in > >>> test/production envs. > >>> > >>> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it > >>> to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. > >>> > >>> Anybody? > >>> > >>> > >> I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation > >> environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to > >> software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users > >> seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. > >> > >> > >> Spin up a VM or two, for folks who actually (or think they actually) > >> need newer software and utility stacks, but use something stable as a > >> base. > >> > >> mark "I do see how many update's my manager's fedora box gets..." > >> > > What I'm really looking forward to - why I thought I'd poke around, thus > > that question - is RDP in Wayland. > > > > When it get's into RHELs I worry be ages and I'd really love to try to > > introduce Linux desktops to those really dumb and unreformable users. > > I thought Ubuntu dropped wayland They dropped mir. They moved to wayland. [They are still working on Mir but aren't integrating it.] > mark > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: > >> lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >>> hi guys >>> >>> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than >>> only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in >>> test/production envs. >>> >>> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it >>> to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. >>> >>> Anybody? >>> >>> >> I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation >> environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to >> software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users >> seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. >> >> >> Spin up a VM or two, for folks who actually (or think they actually) >> need newer software and utility stacks, but use something stable as a >> base. >> >> mark "I do see how many update's my manager's fedora box gets..." >> > What I'm really looking forward to - why I thought I'd poke around, thus > that question - is RDP in Wayland. > > When it get's into RHELs I worry be ages and I'd really love to try to > introduce Linux desktops to those really dumb and unreformable users. I thought Ubuntu dropped wayland mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grpc packages
Thanks. I was specifically looking for c/c++ packages/libraries. On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:20 PM Richard G wrote: > For which language? For golang, it seems to be in EPEL: > > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/Packages/g/golang-github-grpc-grpc-go-devel-1.0.0-0.2.git231b4cf.el7.noarch.rpm > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:55 PM sthustfo wrote: > > > > Is there any repository/location where we can grab prebuilt grpc packages > > for CentOS? Any pointers appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Rsyslog warning
I see this error every day. What should I be looking at to fix it? rsyslogd: sd_journal_get_cursor() failed: 'Cannot assign requested address' [v8.24.0-34.el7] -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. Spin up a VM or two, for folks who actually (or think they actually) need newer software and utility stacks, but use something stable as a base. mark "I do see how many update's my manager's fedora box gets..." What I'm really looking forward to - why I thought I'd poke around, thus that question - is RDP in Wayland. When it get's into RHELs I worry be ages and I'd really love to try to introduce Linux desktops to those really dumb and unreformable users. Everything else - frequent updates, etc. These can be as rare as we users want them, another extra bit of time to think of it would not kill me, personally. Also, we all know, what is in those Fedoras(maybe more so when it comes to "server" variant) is going to end up in our Centoses - why not help by using/testing those, I ask myself. Especially now with 29 which I suspect might be our Centos main new version. So I'm thinking.. I'll start mixing that Fedora Server in. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi guys > > I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only > contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production > envs. > > If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to > be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. > > Anybody? > I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. Spin up a VM or two, for folks who actually (or think they actually) need newer software and utility stacks, but use something stable as a base. mark "I do see how many update's my manager's fedora box gets..." ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING:
Hi, Please what is this error ? /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow (cur: eneral protection fault nable to handle kernel ouble fault: RTNL: assertion failed eek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! adness at NETDEV WATCHDOG ysctl table check failed : nobody cared IRQ handler type mismatch Kernel panic - not syncing: Machine Check Exception: Machine check events logged divide error: bounds: coprocessor segment overrun: invalid TSS: segment not present: invalid opcode: alignment check: stack segment: fpu exception: simd exception: iret exception: /var/log/messages -- /usr/bin/abrt-dump-oops -xtD uname -a 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 26 15:12:11 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core) Thank's -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On 12/20/18 10:07 AM, Patrick Bégou wrote: Le 20/12/2018 à 14:11, lejeczek via CentOS a écrit : hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org Using fedora will lead you to reinstall servers frequently, for almost each new versions I think. Many years ago I was using opensuse as some of my servers were running SLES and migration between versions was realy difficult without full reinstall every 1,5 to 2 years... Patrick That's just...err, misinformation. The Fedora team works very hard to enable upgrading (without a clean install) from one release to the next...often skipping releases is fine (e.g., 27 to 29). That said, I only have a few Fedora boxes (used like servers -- that is, not on people's desks) for my users that need more bleeding edge software stacks and additional packages than CentOS + EPEL can provide. Due to the heavy flow of packages updates and kernel updates, it takes a special kind of user to cope with updates, reboots, and occasional breakage. Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
Le 20/12/2018 à 14:11, lejeczek via CentOS a écrit : > hi guys > > I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only > contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in > test/production envs. > > If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it > to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. > > Anybody? > > Many thanks, L. > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Using fedora will lead you to reinstall servers frequently, for almost each new versions I think. Many years ago I was using opensuse as some of my servers were running SLES and migration between versions was realy difficult without full reinstall every 1,5 to 2 years... Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrading 7.5 ==> 7.6
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS On Behalf Of Fred Smith > I have, as I said, several other machines to upgrade, too, some of them ... > a couple of VMs (in virtualbox) and at work several other VMS as well as ... > I'd appreciate any advice I can get on how to get these systems upgraded > without breaking them. Can you clone the VMs first? That will give you machines to bang on until you've hammered out all the bumps in the upgrade process. Then for the production VM, take a pre-upgrade snapshot you can roll back to when the process finds a new way to go sideways. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kickstart install - solved
I did find the anaconda.log file. I had the same URL that I expected. The issue was the repo xml file was empty... So just was a copy of the data through the network . All is working as expected. Jerry > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Updates in 7.6.1810/os Repository from the CR Announce List
As part of the CR process ( https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR ), the following updates were done and are included in the CentOS base ( os/ ) repository for CentOS Linux 7.6.1810. https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2018-November/thread.html https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2018-December/thread.html There was an issue with the announcement generation scripting that used the errata API to pull information for the announcements (that is now fixed), so some of the announcements happened later than the actual build date and release date of the packages (as an example, the date we created the man-db announcement was December 19th ( https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2018-December/005800.html ) .. the actual date of the package build was 30 Oct 2018 08:26:54 PM UTC .. and it was signed and then released initially into CR on 12 Nov 2018. We have since generated any missing announcements to the CR announce list and also any updates to the os/ repo (that live in the udpates/ repo) were announced to this centos-announce list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS] Updates in 7.6.1810/os Repository from the CR Announce List
As part of the CR process ( https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CR ), the following updates were done and are included in the CentOS base ( os/ ) repository for CentOS Linux 7.6.1810. https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2018-November/thread.html https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2018-December/thread.html There was an issue with the announcement generation scripting that used the errata API to pull information for the announcements (that is now fixed), so some of the announcements happened later than the actual build date and release date of the packages (as an example, the date we created the man-db announcement was December 19th ( https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2018-December/005800.html ) .. the actual date of the package build was 30 Oct 2018 08:26:54 PM UTC .. and it was signed and then released initially into CR on 12 Nov 2018. We have since generated any missing announcements to the CR announce list and also any updates to the os/ repo (that live in the udpates/ repo) were announced to this centos-announce list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Atomic ISO unavailable
On 12/14/18 9:04 AM, Eric Lehmann wrote: > Hello > > The > http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/images/CentOS-Atomic-Host-7-Installer.iso > > provided in > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download > is down. > > Does anybody know if there is a reason for that? > Use this: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/atomic/images/CentOS-Atomic-Host-Installer.iso signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On 12/20/18 5:11 AM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L. I run CentOS 7 but with an updated server stack, including rebuilds (sonetimes with tweaks) of Fedora packages. Gives me a stable base with modern server software. Does take some work to get some stuff built. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] A question about why the function "recv" return 0
> after the ssl handshake, the client side reset the tcp connection. Client doesn’t like TLS cypher list. Client doesn’t have intermediate certificate. Server needs intermediate certificate configured. Client needs remote certificate “installed”. Many more TLS issues. > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 166, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2018:3854 Low CentOS 6 ntp Security Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2018:3847 CentOS 7 pacemaker BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:46:54 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:3854 Low CentOS 6 ntp Security
Update
Message-ID: <20181219234654.ga25...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:3854 Low
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3854
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
8d4c7f5edb0fb14af55ff6f74ee15349e69f5a8ff180b39b2fbbd01d99c0199a
ntp-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.i686.rpm
a9a5283906f361f4b2d85be307eb8c7574bc749ec6e9d03988831b628e2bd273
ntpdate-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.i686.rpm
18edea5cb7d5a13afc34464fd4cef7cbd46e6d6a7b91acbf1a6dd58a9997a411
ntp-doc-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.noarch.rpm
ba4d8eff03ce5ffdd42025c0aa9e21ca1429f02909e2e0f39a2d838c22e04eae
ntp-perl-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
b6ee6afaf3ff4b90b3a3f0077e111362a9ce6912384799b4798cfba3984a60ec
ntp-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
0bd3608f6a5a0935529f9e16de6b875ac810e89f25fc03a034e1e11e763b9bf9
ntpdate-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
18edea5cb7d5a13afc34464fd4cef7cbd46e6d6a7b91acbf1a6dd58a9997a411
ntp-doc-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.noarch.rpm
c638a5e57e7895b4c605f63077902c141ada8a26bf2a94272dc0d11f0a35bc30
ntp-perl-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b41d310c7c14b58374dfd75e55b5b9b9f7105ca983e0a3ac4cf43be95e47da8b
ntp-4.2.6p5-15.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:47:22 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2018:3847 CentOS 7 pacemaker BugFix
Update
Message-ID: <20181219234722.ga25...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:3847
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3847
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
2e35900146ccf77ab81cb32e8a7957c10aa678bae36c55744e9b18f1750a95e8
pacemaker-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
5b54875eaccb9c93054e5eef35caf5ff46e2f0cfbd2acb859b813cb3f473301f
pacemaker-cli-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
e2312c85fc1373cf28748db20cfee3135a390b48b9c0abce874e9939af9377fb
pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.i686.rpm
302e43e36b0262d23fb2cd34f393eb5834c7f82944d79d3e46923f9d6544cb54
pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
a7b495377398e9c514391716bc0a34c66287be8fbad4b47c4d6ff48c9edfa1b0
pacemaker-cts-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
e295d5e858815ad9b39d2498e24de56a7c4aef479f04dedc0e86cee13aaf1727
pacemaker-doc-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
3d8ca4d2a12878da0d49541b27c8266d6d7e01f8c984b66443f8b1a87b55c004
pacemaker-libs-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.i686.rpm
a19e6555225e34aed04e981aad4925a85c67452b92cece2000e76d03fce500dc
pacemaker-libs-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
65952d9647e01febadc9e68a438e2ca1cf4ab15deaace176761edcbe094ec380
pacemaker-libs-devel-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.i686.rpm
bfa7aa216dab27e96169eb2b63ed0e233eaba1368dd2bbb00e22eaa52348f321
pacemaker-libs-devel-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
db71a78725c41b66642e5ed756d0b7bfeee2ca1230cbf9433ee1cfbc27d245f0
pacemaker-nagios-plugins-metadata-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
51f9cbc0b8ccf236667e2b6bf057b662a44abdb4633efa58c4961362a9e3bf6a
pacemaker-remote-1.1.19-8.el7_6.2.x86_64.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
--
Subject: Digest Footer
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
--
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 166, Issue 6
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grpc packages
For which language? For golang, it seems to be in EPEL: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/Packages/g/golang-github-grpc-grpc-go-devel-1.0.0-0.2.git231b4cf.el7.noarch.rpm On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:55 PM sthustfo wrote: > > Is there any repository/location where we can grab prebuilt grpc packages > for CentOS? Any pointers appreciated. > > Thanks. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
