Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Centos 7.6 and Aeskulap]

[Peter]

> I tried to compile aeskulap on Centos 7.6 by using the commands ./configure 
> followed by
> make which resulted in the following errors :

Attempting to build this way is next to pointless and will likely show
you errors completely unrelated to why the package won't properly build.

> make[4]: *** [dimoimg.o] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-
> beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle/libsrc'
> make[3]: *** [libsrc-all] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory 
> `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle'
> make[2]: *** [dcmimgle-libsrc-all] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2

...and even if you were building it correctly you completely skipped the
actual errors here.  What you've shown can't be used in any significant
way to help.

> I downloaded the source files from :
> 
> http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/SRPMS/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.17beta1.el7.nux.src.rpm

As you've already stated and shown here this is a package from a
3rd-party repo, and as such is not supported by the CentOS project.  If
Nux can't help you then I suggest you look for the package elsewhere or
try to (properly) build it yourself.  Unfortunately neither of these
options is supported here.


Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Centos 7.6 and Aeskulap]

[Alice Wonder]

On 12/27/18 7:53 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:

Everyone,

Apparently, aeskulap is broken during the upgrade fro 7.5 to 7.6, and
is no longer available in the epel repos.

I had some difficulty having it function, and during the debug process
I decided to do a yum remove, but when I tried a yum install to
reinstall it, aeskulap was no longer present.  This problem may also affect
other modules.

I have placed a bug report :

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659667

The depracation of tcp wrappers may be involved in this

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers


tcp_wrappers is still part of CentOS 7 in 7.6.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Centos 7.6 and Aeskulap]

[Gregory P. Ennis]

Everyone,

Apparently, aeskulap is broken during the upgrade fro 7.5 to 7.6, and
is no longer available in the epel repos.

I had some difficulty having it function, and during the debug process
I decided to do a yum remove, but when I tried a yum install to
reinstall it, aeskulap was no longer present.  This problem may also affect
other modules.

I have placed a bug report :

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659667

The depracation of tcp wrappers may be involved in this

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers

--

Everyone,

As it turns out the problem was not related to the EPEL repo, but rather to the 
nux-dextop
repo.  I have contacted the maintainer of nex-dextop and he advised me that 
although
aeskulap compiled on Centos 7.5 it would not compile on 7.6.  

Does anyone on the list have any knowledge of what may be happening.  

Thank you,

Greg Ennis

-

Everyone,

I tried to compile aeskulap on Centos 7.6 by using the commands ./configure 
followed by
make which resulted in the following errors :

make[4]: *** [dimoimg.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-
beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle/libsrc'
make[3]: *** [libsrc-all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle'
make[2]: *** [dcmimgle-libsrc-all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1'
make: *** [all] Error 2

I downloaded the source files from :

http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/SRPMS/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.17beta1.el7.nux.src.rpm

If any of you can give me a starting point for this I would appreciate it.  
Apparently
aeskulap did compile on Centos 7.5 and earlier os.

Thank in advance!!!

Greg Ennis

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] recording session

[Fran Garcia]

https://scribery.github.io/



On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 16:46, Ilyass Kaouam  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please if you know any opensource tools he can recording session ?
> Freeipa can do this ?
>
> Thank's
>
> --
> *Ilyass kaouam*
> *Ingénieur System OpenSource*
> *Mastère européen Manager de Projets Informatiques*
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] recording session

[Leroy Tennison]

Leroy Tennison
Network Information/Cyber Security Specialist
E: le...@datavoiceint.com
2220 Bush Dr
McKinney, Texas
75070
www.datavoiceint.com
TThis message has been sent on behalf
of a company that is part of the Harris Operating Group of
Constellation Software Inc. These companies are listed
here
.
If you prefer not to be contacted by Harris
Operating Group
please notify us
.
This message is intended exclusively for the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication
may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are
not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print,
retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the
message.

-Original Message-
From: CentOS  On Behalf Of Ilyass Kaouam
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 9:45 AM
To: CentOS mailing list 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [CentOS] recording session

Hi,

Please if you know any opensource tools he can recording session ?
Freeipa can do this ?

Thank's

--
*Ilyass kaouam*
*Ingénieur System OpenSource*
*Mastère européen Manager de Projets Informatiques* 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

You need to be more specific, what kind of session are you wanting to record 
and what do you want recorded about that session.  Sudo logging has the ability 
to record everything (including timing) about a sudo session.  The script 
utility can record all or a part of a terminal session.  Be aware that escape 
sequences are recorded as well making re-use (particularly with script) 
challenging.  If you need something different then reply defining that need 
much more specifically, do you need just session start and end times, keystroke 
logging, what?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] compiling fedora srpm on CentOS

[Pete Biggs]

On Thu, 2018-12-27 at 20:56 +0530, sthustfo wrote:
> I tried installing fedora grpc srpm on CentOS and ran into following error
> when installing srpm. I understand fedora makes use of more recent versions
> of openssl, glibc etc but why should this happen when installing source rpm?
> 
> Any pointers/articles on how to go about building fedora srpms on CentOS?
> Any way out other than building directly using sources?
> 
> rpm -i grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm

Because that isn't the source rpm, it's the 32-bit binary rpm. You will
need the package name that ends .src.rpm

Building RPMs on CentOS is covered here:

  https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM

It doesn't really matter which system the SRPM comes from, your success
at building it will depend on whether the requirements for the build
can be satisfied on your system.

P.




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] recording session

[Ilyass Kaouam]

Hi,

Please if you know any opensource tools he can recording session ?
Freeipa can do this ?

Thank's

-- 
*Ilyass kaouam*
*Ingénieur System OpenSource*
*Mastère européen Manager de Projets Informatiques*
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] compiling fedora srpm on CentOS

[Mike Burger]

On 2018-12-27 10:26, sthustfo wrote:
I tried installing fedora grpc srpm on CentOS and ran into following 
error
when installing srpm. I understand fedora makes use of more recent 
versions
of openssl, glibc etc but why should this happen when installing source 
rpm?


Any pointers/articles on how to go about building fedora srpms on 
CentOS?

Any way out other than building directly using sources?

rpm -i grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm
warning: grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, 
key

ID cfc659b9: NOKEY
error: Failed dependencies:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.28) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libcrypto.so.1.1 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.29) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libprotobuf.so.17 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libssl.so.1.1 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.21) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686


The issue is that you're not installing a source RPM...rather, you're 
installing a 32bit binary RPM.


rpm -i grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm

Source RPMs' filenames end in srpm and 64bit binary RPMs end in 
x86_64.rpm...you'll want to double check the RPM that you're trying to 
install, make sure that you truly want to utilize a source RPM and that 
if you're running a 64bit system, you install a 64bit RPM.


Additionally, if you use "yum localinstall" to install the RPM, binary 
or source, it will work to install the prerequisite RPMs for you.


Final thought...by and large, its not customary to install a source RPM 
but to run it through rpmbuild to build it, specifically, for your 
system.


--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

"It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever 
just stops by to say 'hi' anymore." --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] compiling fedora srpm on CentOS

[sthustfo]

I tried installing fedora grpc srpm on CentOS and ran into following error
when installing srpm. I understand fedora makes use of more recent versions
of openssl, glibc etc but why should this happen when installing source rpm?

Any pointers/articles on how to go about building fedora srpms on CentOS?
Any way out other than building directly using sources?

rpm -i grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm
warning: grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key
ID cfc659b9: NOKEY
error: Failed dependencies:
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.28) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libcrypto.so.1.1 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.29) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libprotobuf.so.17 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libssl.so.1.1 is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.21) is needed by grpc-1.17.1-3.fc30.i686
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Docker + ipv6

[Ulf Volmer]

On 27.12.18 12:53, Joe wrote:

> i want to use docker with ipv6.
> 
> i install docker and edit the /etc/docker/daemon.json:
> {
>   "ipv6": true
> }

i guess you have to specify your ipv6 subnet in deamon.json.

  "fixed-cidr-v6": "2001:db8:1::/64"

best regards
Ulf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Docker + ipv6

[Joe]

Hello,

i want to use docker with ipv6.

i install docker and edit the /etc/docker/daemon.json:
{
  "ipv6": true
}


Message:

[root@froodo network-scripts]# systemctl status docker
● docker.service - Docker Application Container Engine
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/docker.service; enabled; vendor 
preset: disabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Do 2018-12-27 12:46:22 CET; 1min 
17s ago
 Docs: http://docs.docker.com
 Main PID: 15041 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

Dez 27 12:46:21 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: 
time="2018-12-27T12:46:21.570534716+01:00" level=info msg="libcontainerd: new 
containerd process, pid: 15045"
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: 
time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.673394351+01:00" level=info msg="Graph migration to 
content-addressability took 0.00 seconds"
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: 
time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.674651938+01:00" level=info msg="Loading containers: 
start."
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: 
time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.700417054+01:00" level=info msg="Firewalld running: 
true"
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: 
time="2018-12-27T12:46:22.903025438+01:00" level=info msg="Default bridge (docker0) 
is assigned with an IP address 172.17.0.0/16. Daemon option --bip can be used to set a preferred IP 
address"
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org dockerd-current[15041]: Error starting daemon: Error 
initializing network controller: Error creating default "bridge" network: could 
not find an available, non-overlapping IPv6 address pool among the defaults to assign to 
the network
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: docker.service: main process exited, 
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: Failed to start Docker Application 
Container Engine.
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: Unit docker.service entered failed state.
Dez 27 12:46:22 froodo.org systemd[1]: docker.service failed.



My ip config:

[root@froodo network-scripts]# ip addr
1: lo:  mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group 
default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0:  mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP 
group default qlen 1000
link/ether 96:00:00:17:06:a4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 116.203.40.3/32 brd 116.203.40.3 scope global dynamic eth0
   valid_lft 84360sec preferred_lft 84360sec
inet6 2a01:4f8:1c0c:7c6c::1/64 scope global
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::9400:ff:fe17:6a4/64 scope link
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever


I tried a lot of things from differnt howtos, but only with no success.

What the next steps to running docker with ipv6?

Thx.

Joe

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: centos docker which repo (centos or docker)

[Yamaban]

On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:56 CET, ralf.prengel@... wrote:


My question:

Should I use docker from the standard repo or the version from the docker-repo?


Main diff between std-repo and docker-repo:

std-repo:
   works. stable. not the newest, shiniest version, but one that works.

docker-repo:
   works most of the time mostly, has sometimes a erratic or memory-eating
   behavior, the newest, most feature-rich, shiniest version, with all the
   bugs of new-new-new.

It's a matter of choose your poision. If you are happy with the features
of the std-repo version, imho stay with it.

That's my exp. Yours may differ. Others should speak up, too, please.

 - Yamaban.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] centos docker which repo (centos or docker)

[ralf.prengel]

Hallo,



I planning to migrate ouch dockerfarm from debian to centos.

Most of our customers are using redhat or centos and some oft eh books I m 
using are written for centos too.

My question:

Should I use docker from the standard repo or the version from the docker-repo?



Thanks for hints



Ralf



Ralf Prengel
Teamleiter
Customer Care
Comline AG
Hauert 8
D-44227 Dortmund/Germany
...
Telefon:+49 231 97575 157
Mobil:  +49 151 10831 157
Fax:+49 231 97575 257
E-Mail: ralf.pren...@comline.de
...
www.comline.de
Vorstand: Stephan Schilling

Aufsichtsrat: Otto Prange (Vorsitzender)

HR Dortmund B 14570 USt.-ID-Nr. DE 124727422

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos