Re: [CentOS] [OT] odd network question

2019-08-01 Thread John Pierce
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:53 PM Fred Smith 
wrote:

> 

reveals that of all the source addresses trying to poke at 48825,
> there are 193 unique addresses. Either this indicates a heck of a lot
> of sites having at my firewall, or that some few sites are all spoofing
> their addresses. I can sort of understand people whaling away at ports
> that may conceal gold, from their warped point of view, but I haven't a
> clue why so many people would be beating on some apparently unassigned
> and unused port.
>


distributed botnets  its all noise.




-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] [OT] odd network question

2019-08-01 Thread Fred Smith
I know this is OT, but I'm not sure where else to ask. I can hope for 
fogiveness! :)

My home router sends its logs to the rsyslog on my desktop system, and
from there I can learn all kinds of interesting (or disturbing) things.
I've written a really horrid shellscript (about 20 things piped together
with a temp file in the middle) to give me the count of DROP events for
specific incoming ports. (The "Description" field is lifted verbatim from
/etc/services.)

Count   PortDescription
-   ---
140750  48825   
12251   23  telnet  23/tcp
10043   445 microsoft-ds445/tcp
28691   tcpmux  1/tcp   # TCP port 
service multiplexer
24789   discard 9/tcp   sink null
21548080webcache8080/tcphttp-alt# WWW caching 
service
19905060sip 5060/tcp# SIP
15928089
14528545
13583389ms-wbt-server   3389/tcp# MS WBT Server
1275443 https   443/tcp # http protocol 
over TLS/SSL
127581  
12585000commplex-main   5000/tcp#
124480  http80/tcp  www www-http# WorldWideWeb 
HTTP
10228291
840 60001   
834 7547cwmp7547/tcp# DSL Forum CWMP
821 1433ms-sql-s1433/tcp# 
Microsoft-SQL-Server
809 23233d-nfsd 2323/tcp# 3d-nfsd
764 personal-agent  /tcp# Personal Agent

This is just the first screen of it, there are many more. The data
compiled here is for the last month (rsyslog is keeping the current
log plus four older logs). I find it disturbing that there were 12251
attempts at telnet during that time, 2154 on 8080, and so forth. either
I'm some kind of special/hot target, or else everybody gets this kind
of crap and may not even know it.

But the one thing I mean to ask about here is the very first item,
140,750 attempts at port 48825. What the heck is port 48825? I can't
find any reference to anything that uses it online, but for some reason
it is extremely popular, at least amongst the turkeys trying to break
into my network!

A little more grepping:

grep 'DPT=48825' Firewall-Log* | grep -o "SRC=[09123456789.]*" | sort -u -t '.' 
-k "1.5g,1g" | less

reveals that of all the source addresses trying to poke at 48825,
there are 193 unique addresses. Either this indicates a heck of a lot
of sites having at my firewall, or that some few sites are all spoofing
their addresses. I can sort of understand people whaling away at ports
that may conceal gold, from their warped point of view, but I haven't a
clue why so many people would be beating on some apparently unassigned
and unused port.

Anyone got any clues?

Thanks in advance!

Fred
-- 
---
 .Fred Smith   /  
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : / 
 //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
//  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 
 Jude 1:24,25 -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virsh: howto convert storage type of VMs?

2019-08-01 Thread hw

On 8/1/19 10:19 PM, Jon Pruente wrote:

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:50 PM hw  wrote:



Hi,

how can I convert the storage type of VMs from being stored in
individual qcow2 files to being stored in a storage pool?

The VMs may be shut down during the conversion.



qemu-img convert -O {output_type} {inputfile} {output_file or pool path}


Thanks!

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virsh: howto convert storage type of VMs?

2019-08-01 Thread Jon Pruente
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:50 PM hw  wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> how can I convert the storage type of VMs from being stored in
> individual qcow2 files to being stored in a storage pool?
>
> The VMs may be shut down during the conversion.
>

qemu-img convert -O {output_type} {inputfile} {output_file or pool path}
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-docs] I need to open the personal homepage function, thank you very much.

2019-08-01 Thread Timothy Lee
Hi,

I believe your romanised (拼音) Chinese name would be acceptable.

Regards,
Timothy

On 1 August 2019 1:35:14 pm AEST, lost maniac  wrote:
>Because I am from China, this is the English name.
>
>Alan Bartlett  于2019年7月30日周二 下午10:42写道:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 07:03, lost maniac 
>wrote:
>> >
>> > I need to open the personal homepage function, thank you very much.
>> > My wiki account is: LostManiac
>> >
>> >  thank you very much
>> > ___
>> > CentOS-docs mailing list
>> > CentOS-docs@centos.org
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>
>> No, I am sorry but that is not an acceptable name. It needs to be a
>> real given name and a real family name. The CentOS Project interacts
>> with real people and not gaming avatars.
>>
>> Alan.
>> ___
>> CentOS-docs mailing list
>> CentOS-docs@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>>
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS] virsh: howto convert storage type of VMs?

2019-08-01 Thread hw



Hi,

how can I convert the storage type of VMs from being stored in 
individual qcow2 files to being stored in a storage pool?


The VMs may be shut down during the conversion.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Are those functions thread-safe, i.e. fprintf() and fflush()

2019-08-01 Thread Roberto Ragusa

On 8/1/19 3:36 PM, qw wrote:


Are those functions thread-safe, i.e. fprintf() and fflush() ?


"man fprintf" has the answer.

"yum install man-pages" if you do not have it installed already.

Spoiler: yes, they are thread-safe, but fprintf may act strange if
you change your locale while it is running.

Regards.

--
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Are those functions thread-safe, i.e. fprintf() and fflush()

2019-08-01 Thread qw
Hi,


I have one question:


Are those functions thread-safe, i.e. fprintf() and fflush() ?


Thanks!


Regard


Andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 174, Issue 1

2019-08-01 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2019:1873 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2019:1896 Moderate CentOS 7 389-ds-base  Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2019:1899  CentOS 7 bind BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CESA-2019:1880 Low CentOS 7 curl Security Update (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CEBA-2019:1882  CentOS 7 foomatic BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   6. CEBA-2019:1893  CentOS 7 gdm BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   7. CEBA-2019:1889  CentOS 7 ipa BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   8. CEBA-2019:1877 CentOS 7 keepalived BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   9. CEBA-2019:1890 CentOS 7 kexec-tools BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  10. CESA-2019:1884 Moderate CentOS 7 libssh2 Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
  11. CEBA-2019:1888 CentOS 7 ModemManager BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  12. CEBA-2019:1892  CentOS 7 mutter BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  13. CEBA-2019:1874  CentOS 7 net-snmp BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  14. CEBA-2019:1897  CentOS 7 pcs BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  15. CESA-2019:1883 Important CentOS 7 qemu-kvmSecurity Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
  16. CEBA-2019:1876  CentOS 7 rear BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  17. CEEA-2019:1894 CentOS 7 resource-agents   Enhancement Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
  18. CEBA-2019:1878 CentOS 7 selinux-policy BugFix Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
  19. CEBA-2019:1885  CentOS 7 sos BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  20. CEBA-2019:1895  CentOS 7 systemd BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  21. CEBA-2019:1901  CentOS 7 tuned BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  22. CEBA-2019:1893 CentOS 7 xorg-x11-server BugFixUpdate
  (Johnny Hughes)
  23. CEEA-2019:1887 CentOS 7 sysstat Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
  24. CEBA-2019:1875  CentOS 7 samba BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  25. CEBA-2019:1886 CentOS 7 mesa-libGLw BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
  26. CESA-2019:1898 Low CentOS 7 httpd Security Update (Johnny Hughes)
  27. CEBA-2019:1900 CentOS 7 cloud-utils-growpart  BugFix Update
  (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:31:33 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:1873 Important CentOS 7 kernel
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20190731133133.ga19...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:1873 Important

Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1873

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
e429def0b44ffea3f9248985ed9d7f28a5c479c2f36b631e2cd255e56cdbb194  
bpftool-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
4fd20e7357b762dab1422469434bcc28a11beb197b06648703f2d8e90039be34  
kernel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
81c050f3e51a81afbfc728f162ff7b026ab4540f9793e66b1fddc454e4ec7ba4  
kernel-abi-whitelists-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.noarch.rpm
e5d6fabc6d701dc70faf094d00adfbfccad6715aa6906faccdd295ced70a1868  
kernel-debug-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
3c036f5a50f60bc719e7677edc94a85db3abb9bd4619296bffe80bbf7db5  
kernel-debug-devel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
449b9f2934bbacf784cc7963804ea9e7c73e368c34df7a58852121a77a8a8fcd  
kernel-devel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
7fc48b6305f5a764b418bd93439a74dc8b68239f6ca482c736f644a13de63137  
kernel-doc-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.noarch.rpm
dcba6cda3e82004a9b75cc1a029bb5a822baaaefe17155579289b644f7c5a575  
kernel-headers-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
774bebfbbf9949a53d24e611a3675c1d7a97e216d2474e9792b564d73228ba82  
kernel-tools-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
9d414c9f2a32b1a0afa483e1cc3bd7867e78cd8af0e4701ca76b6d6a369643a0  
kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
508451d9951f66ec11651eb64cceae56086e42e430eadbec45c7e21f2b335386  
kernel-tools-libs-devel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
a1ab07cf2a5080758468b62ed0c0257538ae0ab4137f651e8fcd39a3850c9a96  
perf-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm
3c5e0a05eed4a038bb09d0ae5861574113c815f2a24a1ec64a8218a86b373e5f  
python-perf-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64.rpm

Source:
2daeadf23e70629607f607409e67cf37b9f01da80ff01195d950cf9059e5ab5c  
kernel-3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:36:25 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: 

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 partiitioning for reliability

2019-08-01 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 7/19/19 11:57 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I was just given a Dell R720xd with 160 GB memory and 12x 900 GB drives
> that I plan to deploy as my home mail/file/backup server to replace an
> aging Supermicro server running CentOS 7. Yeah, it's gross overkill for
> that and I expect to tuck most of the drives away for spares.
> 
> How should I RAID and partition this beast for maximum reliability?
> 
> My current C7 system is using 1 TB of 2 TB capacity on the root
> partition (4x 1 TB drives in RAID 10). /boot is 300MB/50GB. Memory and
> swap is 8GB each.

As I read it, 500MB boot will be enough. My CentOS 7 server (with GUI)
without /home uses some 15GB (of 24GB root partition) so anything over
20GB should be enough for root partiton. 8GB SWAP should be enough since
you will not hibernate it.



> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 


-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos