Re: [CentOS] Crashed a CentOS 8 installation.
Hi, The mistake was EFI. The source CentOS 7.7 machine was EFI boot. and the destination CentOS 8 VM was non EFI. Made a VM snapshot and wrote a script to install the packages one by one and reboot each time. The VM crashed at grub2-efi-x64.x86_64 thanks. -- Thomas Stephen Lee On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:05 PM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 10/16/19 4:05 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 04:00:20PM +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > >> Failed to switch root: Specified switch root path /sysroot does not > seem to > >> be an OS tree. os-release file is missing. > >> > >> What am I doing wrong? > > > > Tested, and yes, this happens after a reboot, grub2 isn't giving the > > initrd a root disk to switch to. > > > > I had to edit the grub.cfg and add a single line, > > set default_kernelopts="..." > > > > (using what was GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= was set in /etc/default/grub) > > > > I'm not exactly sure which package that was installed that caused > > this. > > > > Create a snapshot of clean VM and divide that list in 10 pieces and > install them one at the time and reboot afterwards. If VM boots, create > another snapshot. When it fails, reverse to previous snaphot and divide > that segment into 5-10 smaller pieces, rinse and repeat. > > -- > Ljubomir Ljubojevic > (Love is in the Air) > PL Computers > Serbia, Europe > > StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Top 7 Programming Languages That Employers Really Want
Subject: Top 7 Programming Languages That Employers Really Want Good day from Singapore, Article: Top 7 Programming Languages That Employers Really Want Author: Nick Kolakowski Date Published: 14 October 2019 Link: https://insights.dice.com/2019/10/14/7-programming-languages-employers-want/ This is just a quick survey. May I know what programming languages do you know? I am considering being a programmer or developer. How long will it take for me to master a programming language like C++, Java, and Python? Thank you very much. -BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017) and in Taiwan (5 Aug 2019): [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -END EMAIL SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Custom LiveCD images with CentOS8
Is it at this moment possible to build custom LiveCD images? Are they all necessary tools available in CentOS8? I have never done this and wonder if it is still possible for C8. C7 stuff seems to be here: https://github.com/CentOS/sig-core-livemedia Not quite sure if Fedora howtos can be applied here. Any hints? Thanks, Leon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
Johnny Hughes wrote: > Is gnome3 really that bad :D It's better than Microsoft Bob, I suppose. -- Yves Bellefeuille ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
On 10/17/19 7:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. Is gnome3 really that bad :D :) As much as I was tempted to try Mate, I decided using Gnome might be better in the long run. Using Gnome 3 "classic" with a "startx" start which has issues in terms of everything working right as opposed to gdm, but, well, this is what I wanted to do. I just wish Gnome 3.28 was more configurable without a lot of work. I decided to just bite the bullet and shift to real gnome3 (and not the classic) about 4 years ago. It waas different and took some time to learn .. BUT .. I can do everything I need to do now. I like both mate and cinnamon .. so I am not knocking either one. I just think people might be well server switching to a 'supported' desktop in the longer run. Again .. don't get me wrong .. it's open source, so do what makes you happy :D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
Le 17/10/2019 à 16:08, Johnny Hughes a écrit : Is gnome3 really that bad :D There's an easy way to figure that out. Our local school has been 100 % GNU/Linux since 2010 (when we first installed CentOS 5 on desktops and servers). On the latest count, I have a hundred users there. Over the years, I've tried a variety of desktop environments, from GNOME 2.x on CentOS 5.x and CentOS 6.x to a beefed-up Xfce. Then we tested GNOME 3 on CentOS 7.x, and it was a mild disaster. Next was KDE, and everyone loved it, since most of my users come from a Windows background, and the basic usability is vaguely similar. When Red Hat decided to drop KDE for the subsequent release, I decided to switch the desktop clients to OpenSUSE Leap KDE. The servers are still running CentOS (and will always be running CentOS I guess). I guess everyone's happy now, because no one complains. :o) Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Hiding a grub menuentry?
As long as you include the Grub modules (an issue I ran into with UEFI boot
last week on an .iso), you can use the "read" module to prompt for a hidden
command. Load the read module at the top, then at the end, put in your prompt
and secret boot option. In the case, you type "secret" at the prompt. If you
hit as suggested, you get the normal boot menu without the secret
option (below boot EFI, but it is a very similar process for BIOS, just use the
BIOS linux and initrd commands):
grub.cfg:
...
insmod read
...
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
echo "Press the key to Boot."
read boot_cmd
if [ x"${ boot_cmd}" == x"secret" ]; then
clear
linuxefi /images/pxeboot/vmlinuz
inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=CentOS\x207\x20x86_64
inst.ks=hd:LABEL=CentOS\x207\x20x86_64:/efiks.cfg inst.graphical rhgb quiet
initrdefi /images/pxeboot/initrd.img
boot
fi
### END /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
Gregory Young
-Original Message-
From: CentOS On Behalf Of James Pearson
Sent: October 15, 2019 9:53 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Hiding a grub menuentry?
Does anyone know if it is possible to 'hide' a grub menuentry with CentOS 7 ?
I have a custom menuentry that I don't want to be seen on the grub screen - but
it needs to be selectable as the entry to boot via 'grub2-reboot'
I've scanned the grub2 documentation - but I can't find anything obvious
- so I'm guessing it can't be done - unless someone knows otherwise ?
Thanks
James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vainfo on Intel
I found this: https://centos.pkgs.org/7/rpmfusion-free-updates-x86_64/libva-intel-driver-1.8.3-4.el7.x86_64.rpm.html Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSA key not accepted on CentOS even after enabling
Il Gio 17 Ott 2019, 18:15 Johnny Hughes ha scritto: > PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=+ssh-dss > > You also need that ^^ in their client if they are running on el8 machine > as well .. i needed to put it in my ~/.ssh/config when connecting FROM > an el8 machine to somewhere else. > Yes, true. Thanks for noticing, Johnny. It's not my case in this particular situation, but I have already done it on my Fedora 30 client in another context. Gianluca > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
On 17/10/2019 15:59, Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >>> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on >>> the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? >>> >>> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate >>> is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. >>> >> >> Is gnome3 really that bad :D >> >> I decided to just bite the bullet and shift to real gnome3 (and not the >> classic) about 4 years ago. It waas different and took some time to >> learn .. BUT .. I can do everything I need to do now. >> >> I like both mate and cinnamon .. so I am not knocking either one. I just >> think people might be well server switching to a 'supported' desktop in >> the longer run. >> >> Again .. don't get me wrong .. it's open source, so do what makes you >> happy :D >> > > Johnny, I'm sure it can be learned, apparently lots of people have done > so and are now happy(for some values of happy) with it. > > That is just something I don't feel like doing. I'm not against change, > but the changes in Gnome 3 seemed to me to be needlessly adding pain > and difficulty to what had been a perfectly usable desktop. Every time > I install a new CentOS I grit my teeth at having to remember/figure out > enough of it to get me thru to the point where I can use a friendly UI. > > Yes, I should stop being a luddite and learn it. but, y'know, I just > can't bring myself to deal with the pain. As a geezer, I guess I'm > kinda set in my ways. :) > > Just to get the Mate installed on C8 (as was posted here recently > where/how to do it) was more pain that I enjoyed going through. Now, > I'm sure there are simple solutions to these issues, but I just don't > want to have to stop what I'm doing to google for them... anyway, > I had firefox open and wanted a terminal window. couldn't figure out > how to set it up so I could see both at the same time. Once I maximized > FF I couldn't figure out how to get it to not eat the entire screen--no > clicky buttons on the top-right of the window, so I ended up using the > left-most item at the top of the window (forget what it is named...) to > choose which window I wanted in front. tedious but livable. > > but now I don't have to do that 'cause Mate works great! > > And thanks to you, Johnny, and your companions/associates for all the > many YEARS of work you've all put in on CentOS. Even though I gripe and > complain about Gnome3, I really do appreciate all you've done! > > Fred > If you install gnome-tweaks then you can run up the "tweaks" app. Goto the "Windows" tab and you can turn on title bar buttons, they're down at the bottom. It may not make Gnome friendly, but it does at least reduce the amount of outright hostility shown. -- J Martin Rushton MBCS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 10:59 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any > > > update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? > > > > > > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the > > > lack of Mate is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. > > > > > > > Is gnome3 really that bad :D > > > > I decided to just bite the bullet and shift to real gnome3 (and not > > the > > classic) about 4 years ago. It waas different and took some time > > to > > learn .. BUT .. I can do everything I need to do now. > > > > I like both mate and cinnamon .. so I am not knocking either one. I > > just > > think people might be well server switching to a 'supported' > > desktop in > > the longer run. > > > > Again .. don't get me wrong .. it's open source, so do what makes > > you > > happy :D > > > > Johnny, I'm sure it can be learned, apparently lots of people have > done > so and are now happy(for some values of happy) with it. > > That is just something I don't feel like doing. I'm not against > change, > but the changes in Gnome 3 seemed to me to be needlessly adding pain > and difficulty to what had been a perfectly usable desktop. Every > time > I install a new CentOS I grit my teeth at having to remember/figure > out > enough of it to get me thru to the point where I can use a friendly > UI. > > Yes, I should stop being a luddite and learn it. but, y'know, I just > can't bring myself to deal with the pain. As a geezer, I guess I'm > kinda set in my ways. :) > > Just to get the Mate installed on C8 (as was posted here recently > where/how to do it) was more pain that I enjoyed going through. Now, > I'm sure there are simple solutions to these issues, but I just don't > want to have to stop what I'm doing to google for them... anyway, > I had firefox open and wanted a terminal window. couldn't figure out > how to set it up so I could see both at the same time. Once I > maximized > FF I couldn't figure out how to get it to not eat the entire screen > --no > clicky buttons on the top-right of the window, so I ended up using > the > left-most item at the top of the window (forget what it is named...) > to > choose which window I wanted in front. tedious but livable. > > but now I don't have to do that 'cause Mate works great! > > And thanks to you, Johnny, and your companions/associates for all the > many YEARS of work you've all put in on CentOS. Even though I gripe > and > complain about Gnome3, I really do appreciate all you've done! > > Fred What Fred said, Johnny. I was very happy with GNOME v2 until its developers decided to take magic mushrooms or whatever and shuffled off to Oz. If you want to use GNOME v3, great. But this thread is probably not the best place to trumpet how much you like GNOME v3. A fairly substantial group of us is trying to restore a capability (MATE) that Red Hat deliberately took away from us. I hope when you find yourself on the wrong side of a Red Hat decision you are lucky enough to have a talented and resourceful group to help you recover. --Doc Savage ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DSA key not accepted on CentOS even after enabling
PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=+ssh-dss You also need that ^^ in their client if they are running on el8 machine as well .. i needed to put it in my ~/.ssh/config when connecting FROM an el8 machine to somewhere else. On 10/17/19 9:27 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Hello, > I have some users that connect to a server with their DSA key that is of > type ssh-dss. > I'm migrating (installing as new) the server where they connect to CentOS 8 > + updates. > I was not able to connect with the keys to this new server even after > having added, as found in several internet pages, this directive at the end > of /etc/ssh/sshd_config of the CentOS 8 server: > > # Accept also DSA keys > PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=+ssh-dss > > and > systemctl restart sshd > > I kept getting in journal the message: > userauth_pubkey: key type ssh-dss not in PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes [preauth] > > I saw that the sshd process had started with the option > ... -oPubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519, > ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com > > So I found the unit file for sshd that refers > to /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/opensshserver.config > In the mean time I was able to reach my target going and editing the > /etc/sysconfig/sshd file adding the whole line obtained from the above and > adding ssh-dss > > CRYPTO_POLICY='-oCiphers=aes256-...@openssh.com, > chacha20-poly1...@openssh.com,aes256-ctr,aes256-cbc,aes128-...@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes128-cbc > -oMACs=hmac-sha2-256-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-...@openssh.com, > umac-128-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-512-...@openssh.com > ,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha1,umac-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-512 > -oGSSAPIKexAlgorithms=gss-gex-sha1-,gss-group14-sha1- -oKexAlgorithms= > curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group14-sha256,diffie-hellman-group16-sha512,diffie-hellman-group18-sha512,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 > -oHostKeyAlgorithms=rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519, > ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com > -oPubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, > ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519, > ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com > ,ssh-dss' > > and now it works with pubkey authentication based on DSA keys. > Not going to the querelle of OpenSSH 7 removing DSA keys and DSA vs RSA > (eg. some considerations by some years ago here: > https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/5096/rsa-vs-dsa-for-ssh-authentication-keys > ), > any hint on smarter way to add? > I suppose further updates could change content > of /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/opensshserver.config that btw is part > of crypto-policies-20181217-6.git9a35207.el8.noarch and > not openssh-server-7.8p1-4.el8.x86_64 > > HIH others incurring in this problem and thanks in advance for any > insight/hint, > Gianluca > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 09:08:28AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on > > the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? > > > > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate > > is kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. > > > > Is gnome3 really that bad :D > > I decided to just bite the bullet and shift to real gnome3 (and not the > classic) about 4 years ago. It waas different and took some time to > learn .. BUT .. I can do everything I need to do now. > > I like both mate and cinnamon .. so I am not knocking either one. I just > think people might be well server switching to a 'supported' desktop in > the longer run. > > Again .. don't get me wrong .. it's open source, so do what makes you > happy :D > Johnny, I'm sure it can be learned, apparently lots of people have done so and are now happy(for some values of happy) with it. That is just something I don't feel like doing. I'm not against change, but the changes in Gnome 3 seemed to me to be needlessly adding pain and difficulty to what had been a perfectly usable desktop. Every time I install a new CentOS I grit my teeth at having to remember/figure out enough of it to get me thru to the point where I can use a friendly UI. Yes, I should stop being a luddite and learn it. but, y'know, I just can't bring myself to deal with the pain. As a geezer, I guess I'm kinda set in my ways. :) Just to get the Mate installed on C8 (as was posted here recently where/how to do it) was more pain that I enjoyed going through. Now, I'm sure there are simple solutions to these issues, but I just don't want to have to stop what I'm doing to google for them... anyway, I had firefox open and wanted a terminal window. couldn't figure out how to set it up so I could see both at the same time. Once I maximized FF I couldn't figure out how to get it to not eat the entire screen--no clicky buttons on the top-right of the window, so I ended up using the left-most item at the top of the window (forget what it is named...) to choose which window I wanted in front. tedious but livable. but now I don't have to do that 'cause Mate works great! And thanks to you, Johnny, and your companions/associates for all the many YEARS of work you've all put in on CentOS. Even though I gripe and complain about Gnome3, I really do appreciate all you've done! Fred -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] DSA key not accepted on CentOS even after enabling
Hello, I have some users that connect to a server with their DSA key that is of type ssh-dss. I'm migrating (installing as new) the server where they connect to CentOS 8 + updates. I was not able to connect with the keys to this new server even after having added, as found in several internet pages, this directive at the end of /etc/ssh/sshd_config of the CentOS 8 server: # Accept also DSA keys PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=+ssh-dss and systemctl restart sshd I kept getting in journal the message: userauth_pubkey: key type ssh-dss not in PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes [preauth] I saw that the sshd process had started with the option ... -oPubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519, ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com So I found the unit file for sshd that refers to /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/opensshserver.config In the mean time I was able to reach my target going and editing the /etc/sysconfig/sshd file adding the whole line obtained from the above and adding ssh-dss CRYPTO_POLICY='-oCiphers=aes256-...@openssh.com, chacha20-poly1...@openssh.com,aes256-ctr,aes256-cbc,aes128-...@openssh.com,aes128-ctr,aes128-cbc -oMACs=hmac-sha2-256-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha1-...@openssh.com, umac-128-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-512-...@openssh.com ,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha1,umac-...@openssh.com,hmac-sha2-512 -oGSSAPIKexAlgorithms=gss-gex-sha1-,gss-group14-sha1- -oKexAlgorithms= curve25519-sha...@libssh.org,ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group14-sha256,diffie-hellman-group16-sha512,diffie-hellman-group18-sha512,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 -oHostKeyAlgorithms=rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519, ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com -oPubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes=rsa-sha2-256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256, ecdsa-sha2-nistp256-cert-...@openssh.com,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384, ecdsa-sha2-nistp384-cert-...@openssh.com,rsa-sha2-512,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521, ecdsa-sha2-nistp521-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-ed25519, ssh-ed25519-cert-...@openssh.com,ssh-rsa,ssh-rsa-cert-...@openssh.com ,ssh-dss' and now it works with pubkey authentication based on DSA keys. Not going to the querelle of OpenSSH 7 removing DSA keys and DSA vs RSA (eg. some considerations by some years ago here: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/5096/rsa-vs-dsa-for-ssh-authentication-keys ), any hint on smarter way to add? I suppose further updates could change content of /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/opensshserver.config that btw is part of crypto-policies-20181217-6.git9a35207.el8.noarch and not openssh-server-7.8p1-4.el8.x86_64 HIH others incurring in this problem and thanks in advance for any insight/hint, Gianluca ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 Mate?
On 9/24/19 2:41 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on > the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? > > I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is > kind of a showstopper for me at the moment. > Is gnome3 really that bad :D I decided to just bite the bullet and shift to real gnome3 (and not the classic) about 4 years ago. It waas different and took some time to learn .. BUT .. I can do everything I need to do now. I like both mate and cinnamon .. so I am not knocking either one. I just think people might be well server switching to a 'supported' desktop in the longer run. Again .. don't get me wrong .. it's open source, so do what makes you happy :D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] vainfo on Intel
I am trying to get accelerated video on this device NUC5CPYB Intel Driver is loaded: grep Intel Xorg.0.log [18.006] (**) | |-->Device "Intel Graphics" [18.048] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets: [18.051] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) HD Graphics [18.051] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics [18.051] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics [18.056] (--) intel(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) HD Graphics [18.437] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA Intel PCH Front Headphone Surround (/dev/input/event10) [18.438] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA Intel PCH HDMI/DP,pcm=3 (/dev/input/event11) [18.440] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA Intel PCH Mic (/dev/input/event8) [18.441] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA Intel PCH Headphone Front (/dev/input/event9) Vainfo fails: vainfo libva info: VA-API version 0.40.0 libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib64/dri/i965_drv_video.so libva info: va_openDriver() returns -1 vaInitialize failed with error code -1 (unknown libva error),exit [root@nuc5cdev2 tmp]# ls /usr/lib64/dri/ i915_dri.so i965_dri.so kms_swrast_dri.so nouveau_dri.so r300_dri.so r600_dri.so radeonsi_dri.so swrast_dri.so virtio_gpu_dri.so vmwgfx_dri.so [root@nuc5cdev2 tmp]# [root@nuc5cdev2 tmp]# yum provides "*/*i965_drv_video.so" Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: ftp.ussg.iu.edu * elrepo: ord.mirror.rackspace.com * epel: ord.mirror.rackspace.com * extras: ftp.ussg.iu.edu * updates: ftp.ussg.iu.edu No matches found So vainfo fails, The file its looking for is not on my system and yum says its not available. What do I do ? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
