Re: [CentOS] new observations: Re: Centos 7 installer alert! message
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 2:15 PM R C wrote: > Hello, > > > I installed 72G ram in a Dell (it canhandle 72G according to Dell). The > BIOS says there are 9 8G DIMMs install (BIOS test shows no errors). > dmidecode says there are indeed 9 DIMMs, and they show all fine, no > errors etc. However, free reports tehre's only 54G available. What DIMM manufacture model number are the DIMMs? What “rank” are those models? What CPU is installed? How many CPUs? What model server/chipset? What slots were the DIMMs installed in? Higher rank DIMMs will usually show less/half size if installed in the same “channel” with lower rank in DIMMS before the higher rank DIMMs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script
On 03/18/2021 05:53 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: > >> I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing these data >> files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps incorrectly, assuming >> that the publisher of the data would be one with said stylesheet. (Although >> perhaps that is something an end-user could put together as well??) > > Some high-profile XML schemata (e.g., DocBook) have published stylesheets, > but mostly I've written my own. I have a very trivial example in a blog post > from several years ago: > > https://www.madboa.com/blog/2014/09/10/strip-rss/ > > (My site is completely non-commercial. I gain nothing by you visiting it -- > or ignoring it.) > I looked at your link above and the the one in your previous e-mail - looks very promising! I will take a look at creating a XSLT stylesheet over the weekend and try creating a CSV-file in the desired format. Thank you! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
At 02:03 PM 3/18/2021, you wrote: > At 11:47 AM 3/18/2021, you wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote: >> > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the >> > distribution on a bootable USB key. >> >>I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security >>updates for 7.3, you're going to end up with 7.9 + patches, so why are >>you making your life difficult and installing such an old release? >> >>If a vendor is telling you that you have to run a particular version, >>perhaps you should consider finding another vendor, the baseline 7.3 >>has a lot of glaring vulnerabilities in it that are readily >>exploitable. >> >>-- >>Jonathan Billings >>___ >>CentOS mailing list >>CentOS@centos.org >>https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > One reason might be that somewhere between 7.3 and 7.9, Centos ceased > being bootable on Apple hardware. At least that failure occurred for > me on two machines. > > David > But he was talking about a server, something that Apple doesn't have for a long time now. Simon Simon: I am talking about installing Centos on a MacMini, and a MacPro. Ubuntu works, Centos fails. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2021:0856 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:0856 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0856
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
a6119606e76fc09a37585914c2063026064b1b979d9cffcf71712c2218b4c3c2
bpftool-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
b8c980b0d2eaf56affe69fde8c004c91dde7d83277578de4cfc8c06aaa322858
kernel-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
62db43a91b2c1f3cd0407729f5c13f51ea098fea0aa9b90e2444d92166d1817d
kernel-abi-whitelists-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.noarch.rpm
b918eb715248bdb46d8f49387310a25030a9f4fe192d5ee0f69fabde9b84d42d
kernel-debug-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
3f77e8c91079e010fb161e28eaf613452e1c25d2d67b0367cb344f3141bf3cb9
kernel-debug-devel-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
4abf0ebc2127e7a5b5dfb595fa447cb44f339ff023ce88bb0a97992bba4cd3a9
kernel-devel-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
29feb5e5f9922979d66fabe2aac8bd7fdd18f1915777acf5b360bb7e5cdb0109
kernel-doc-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.noarch.rpm
21af3e26269599f29ef700b687a3e84539aa03ffc025f0794649d54f0a041582
kernel-headers-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
a133fe2fda391e345abde6444e57c6fbfb5ebcfe7720bc5b1ae1c3313bd38aed
kernel-tools-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
34255ef50bd9c16239a9a579c23a1bc1f046428a2aecf0fb06e04340b46af985
kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
6a47e214a36fc58ad9b00ab50073240c79076c8bd04a01dd01029f8ca43122bd
kernel-tools-libs-devel-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
2520a8d9459f82ba9401fb0a86ddb5154277672b55919b252535b199ef9fc3d4
perf-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
9308a731a1aba4b9209f5cc4ee3e7f8bd57be5fa213ed219fd59941fb9b092cb
python-perf-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
26eccba611785427726d6ecdb0a26f910a6ac05b29f3f6e3afd12f4d363a52f9
kernel-3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0854 CentOS 7 dmidecode BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0854
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0854
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
7b812c97766f36c2e477c31f7c5cfaabf34e7bfaf746d34a7f6971d6abc3e95c
dmidecode-3.2-5.el7_9.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e98ba3314e7c5f7b5631d03bb72f3ce929cedaf3fd5386ef71cc432e2bf3c1f7
dmidecode-3.2-5.el7_9.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0861 CentOS 7 slapi-nis BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0861
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0861
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
406370b48821a02c6cd77913d2bbfb9b1c8a38d584ee789492dbdbda1796c482
slapi-nis-0.56.5-3.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0199a9051530c26a95f4b6454e9d3a2ad18715f01785cf9d51976a55fc3b3a9b
slapi-nis-0.56.5-3.el7_9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2021:0808 Important CentOS 7 wpa_supplicant Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:0808 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0808
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
274694000767f81dd075fa9b55a09e5e143824fe75c13fb69a510889a95f7f25
wpa_supplicant-2.6-12.el7_9.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b261ffacff431bd6616224f98faed8eff963aae0e8a3232c5454ce41cfc4d77b
wpa_supplicant-2.6-12.el7_9.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0863 CentOS 7 lvm2 BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0863
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0863
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
71f20a3e8a0bfe010564d4b6ff77d4b2647ba8383e62e64a557c131359fff889
cmirror-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
2ed2fcd8e79d8a62a374c054083792b657cb4d4668e39188deeb1ad3d72c948f
device-mapper-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
88e796afa3934d3cefb09a6a575714bdc8aede8ee6a3c6b7be0bb59a130d5efd
device-mapper-devel-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.i686.rpm
39c70285432c56fe5dd79f0d155069d48956d10fcdcac838a4590c4a44b0b521
device-mapper-devel-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
96abc02747879aa68bd335dadad5f1e2d5ea64c519db929820194757e80af933
device-mapper-event-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
3feced91f7391352cfca0debae0c2aa43febbeee7d24929c75cd8d1d5a6b782e
device-mapper-event-devel-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.i686.rpm
0986dce8e3a59471cabc7ed457e23c3f0fdc81e3cbab4093eaa0426e2d5d26ef
device-mapper-event-devel-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
12fb546150a8175c1aa95419a75e512972cb4c6c8eea1ade84e3319b1cfadaea
device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.i686.rpm
68e1429d8531b268902804fdf15f6eb8ffcadc2d36315c6090a3edb14eb2ab13
device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
85c0d75554f340d99942609a8488c0ad5b2e4ddc0e40c1192056ab8ab8395492
device-mapper-libs-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.i686.rpm
40ebdc19d1f43fa0892059019bcdba4bd97351c6d146ef74e530e00dc4732c4c
device-mapper-libs-1.02.170-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
9d34ca3784c0b623e48bc95dca03187a3404a69dd41baa19138db561f25be0f9
lvm2-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
14b4703549cb70dba8871814b76da451a63a067a0c48cbf78c90a94b528e8071
lvm2-cluster-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
75f984b4cdee8c054416401d8e1a4f00cb8d0fa104e54d12456f8884c58d7db5
lvm2-devel-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.i686.rpm
06d86e24f67250850372882170efd7d12d041a90b28a72fb952a0f3d10141825
lvm2-devel-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
bd945872965d8eeb4accc4fc087400341b7ecfd21918499fa21ff68810cb4194
lvm2-libs-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.i686.rpm
fdbf4bfe28188e74649c64f6a210cdce1aec37dafe82324cc4a7403e012e4c4f
lvm2-libs-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
a1e667c441a340c5ac1f0544c4a3d934fde4bf968688af42f5d33e773f092b5b
lvm2-lockd-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
bff2adfbc894a60df24055ab573b81c8128737c5d8b2530955f48d64f1c121b5
lvm2-python-boom-1.2-2.el7_9.4.noarch.rpm
c3b133e5f06890f86c2c918c35177dfe1000500cfee3fc5ff248faab874324f1
lvm2-python-libs-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
76398082a1500552d12445932d6e5689e02b1ebdced0a38e4003a7fa56871ce1
lvm2-sysvinit-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e524f3b8629d666bb07fca6db6c4cf645fade58651dee4ccbe851534259adf17
lvm2-2.02.187-6.el7_9.4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0868 CentOS 7 389-ds-base BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0868
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0868
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
a6a35e6ed55e101d96fd0ed48dd8267a7e8e10917230172a9de28a796d39490e
389-ds-base-1.3.10.2-10.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
7f2bca34d66595ea71392f8a9fe4f631679313d883bbc5d48d3d49e1ceb88d8b
389-ds-base-devel-1.3.10.2-10.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
cf900656ad664e99d27fd815261164678b178f186d6fbadf440dbc7ab48fbbfe
389-ds-base-libs-1.3.10.2-10.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
37244afa6bebe0e93a5dcd0ef3ea1ac9a76f734e116ce8c087a5f791ad1136d3
389-ds-base-snmp-1.3.10.2-10.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f8002ef8f194c2c50bc7c043887bce64c6c71640d9d2df4593b84b060967cd03
389-ds-base-1.3.10.2-10.el7_9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEEA-2021:0866 CentOS 7 open-vm-tools Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2021:0866
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:0866
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
55be553fdb6b711c94e1f41369abf744fab2d8d3938dc7af09ee75d2249c22d5
open-vm-tools-11.0.5-3.el7_9.2.x86_64.rpm
bede1b23de7ac03e2016ec4a2b4e29cd230b29837f427b14a2d8d9c06f385151
open-vm-tools-desktop-11.0.5-3.el7_9.2.x86_64.rpm
295238e79bcc60f7da37eb6e533e39f157bbafa94bbd0724124a24661cfe67f7
open-vm-tools-devel-11.0.5-3.el7_9.2.x86_64.rpm
ffbadd5995846ef0be55a84dee1a668513bc703e46ee467cb84a4e847415cbe4
open-vm-tools-test-11.0.5-3.el7_9.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
29ef01d702ef3e0b7347d36cc485e26326d46b69b8a050de324d02e9c25dff17
open-vm-tools-11.0.5-3.el7_9.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0864 CentOS 7 glusterfs BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0864
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0864
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
bffa643f42fbf585a2b14d6c8bfb9d7ac804826cf20ad4d14bbdc3c996290615
glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
83e83351bd9f8e17bb928673f2236a6035cf3a335789585a60a5d5068c2c8b23
glusterfs-api-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
a9cdf7b1790648907c553d9bd3ea79400a2884d68c1cb870f1c3d0c0ef2af44d
glusterfs-api-devel-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
9ff292253bb056d6533811af24502ff8e6b9f03d370e153698aff7cc1cb568b6
glusterfs-cli-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
b126c7678a3e74f9a0dca6136f61a6fdd9471991c6ce22a72c08d8a8aa86f2e1
glusterfs-client-xlators-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
18f14d208b245267c6cc29b0b7074e0e030ee89e895659c26047d4186135bd94
glusterfs-cloudsync-plugins-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
b83531fbbb21a612cb6bf9dd29ef1ba3afdeacd82de1d86b9949dac00d9edecb
glusterfs-devel-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
b843af35056b6246dd355d5e90fac356a7c6b609118d69957fefcf9350b3
glusterfs-fuse-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
276df6b2e20398eb1acd7d2327f480491884ec450b49410d4cad1f010cba2e36
glusterfs-libs-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
aa8159ebe427848a84e44ec1263eb6e8467bd09994185803163c9501ede167ad
glusterfs-rdma-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
31a17cc7c43aa0aefd3039a43028118f0ea8b11195c232e1310e14547c07b77d
python2-gluster-6.0-49.1.el7.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c0cbdabb0751f08dacaefe9b6119c121ed57ee16e5edaf031896b416b0986b8f
glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el7.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2021:0851 Important CentOS 7 pki-core Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:0851 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0851
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
821164fdb3e807716631102ab1778e4736d70fc13bfc34bebdebe03bcfc8510f
pki-base-10.5.18-12.el7_9.noarch.rpm
b97ca8437ca8ddd548433b4e5244b6b95c3c06fabebee6a67b64e0183ff83641
pki-base-java-10.5.18-12.el7_9.noarch.rpm
c799c7a9b990e36dedf9785fd1b300a75ffe77c3f8e0e9074d4279a3d1d85cd7
pki-ca-10.5.18-12.el7_9.noarch.rpm
86754c49d208af8b291d53143af752244a68d88e0b4ccbd4efb6811386339d4c
pki-javadoc-10.5.18-12.el7_9.noarch.rpm
f5ed6de364527262c7c94c0a93639ae14e4a1137b79f84385dfd331a2a78b7f4
pki-kra-10.5.18-12.el7_9.noarch.rpm
c2282a789d3df8501b91543727d2c0b76e144991275bca82e8c75c83afbe05d7
pki-server-10.5.18-12.el7_9.noarch.rpm
d5f36384f01382169e35a68adc8feedd5a3f1bb1e38a45244efcf65320e8c633
pki-symkey-10.5.18-12.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
3518ffcaeb18d70ca1e7a98dfb39cdb789944a2791b29a154aa0a970188b0b33
pki-tools-10.5.18-12.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
680812694e7d6b680289c73882db571ef4630c2d3cbb06f0c7a9bd5f54b0788e
pki-core-10.5.18-12.el7_9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0855 CentOS 7 samba BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0855
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0855
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
891dab92096ecafec7121bace38c5d802443f838cef21422beb6a451c0e0892d
ctdb-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
030d403b90d83c7791ba3ea26cc659f709c596898fbfbd5d5f6e4b737a1293fa
ctdb-tests-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
baa1991d1849681ae5e74f8eeb2d213f69221f0c76cbe0018df32bd8f5ec1cb6
libsmbclient-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
25fa10449317511df1bc80c25c0cc1e7bede87a02929b5c0676ce9957353a8d9
libsmbclient-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
9ce18db0c7edcdf3961e7086a8438b700e7bb5f91d89a4bca5049729c6b02228
libsmbclient-devel-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
51eac9ff71e53c4175eb210efa8bffca4476cc9cd86104293d1ca7f714062a4e
libsmbclient-devel-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
bc63c8bfc930293da3e922e892186113cc420688e28a4ef936bbae8372240055
libwbclient-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
6fbcfd20152fd53029a53f360639d892f5a3daa9485dc2be94c27eed6cf2df64
libwbclient-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
b534be5ce2fdd42fba4271d4bfc8275f8788cc729ebeb59920e58209b92fbf2e
libwbclient-devel-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
8134bb4793d96d74f2db411ef17a6b86bcdf3847073ba2f4a8d8e89bc0d849c6
libwbclient-devel-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
19b2915a18191474719e65f30ae39ec3e32b24de808caf1144908d5905ec22db
samba-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
92fe5e925dcbbf773a6a9a67725a97c2ee05ba99988b7c569d34ea5485b8e2ca
samba-client-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
47b080e5a77e0a4e64120cb62ee1a56fde234cd979ec9e29cfa1488c409e4a88
samba-client-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
e5677937bcb75d7acb7f08f429bf9a0f982b23101f1c089b063117be1a84ccb1
samba-client-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
6b1f4e0b7d2eac0f0c87900cfe0b6ceee898b0e7fff0ea37a318fb2be0b794ae
samba-common-4.10.16-13.el7_9.noarch.rpm
f87c2dd925c9d1309b2c16ad21f5c84cb1b2789d322aefb90bd02179185c3c04
samba-common-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
07a39b4944cc8d1c6e61f1ad215c744f685fcf1cf0494ce979a7f28539da66d6
samba-common-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
48d7e4811a291ee31fea33ff56b5e11082ae3d2a0bee442c7ee6b29212f72b3e
samba-common-tools-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
5f7b92aac28013990bf6ff5dfda904b49259d332381f6fd3a71b635df396f7e1
samba-dc-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
0bc7a3258a261dafb1804614ca3e65cc202ca5a9607554f6524da136cb7c7ee6
samba-dc-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
c31f2747e3388b9d79c19442e86c3d4556be28b28509108ed5c494f7278e2a38
samba-devel-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
f8d72ec48ec0e1f77e42f4f2a5c6dbeabe6e13e680771e35008c6865faee59f6
samba-devel-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
a6776dea18957f42231f6c504897a29ef208e3c2b1f0ae2ca2b12d5f93fec583
samba-krb5-printing-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
6ab73b9be208b744fbb10e2b4b62ee6782dd5717e49b00d2c93994bf8c59e499
samba-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
113bbd026677c12bbfb0f6803e303c762606f5f0c0dd003dac3e57e0a598d8c9
samba-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
ac054a6cb21fb80c8fa5d92b7cfe026640f5eb200f4e353fa4faf2ec2c2a0cf9
samba-pidl-4.10.16-13.el7_9.noarch.rpm
4752988d38c83850c74c74ec19ca5b7e1c79f8817544be00ab3fbc407c01355a
samba-python-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
88ebbac297f77c53cd09a2f137fda3254023224d3da2a351b153770a4ada109f
samba-python-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
809f841a5c44ddbe609d0827d1562e3515efe0f58ca9a5b5495789e578e2f7cf
samba-python-test-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
ef6b1d6ee31b3645952263c7292d83ff8479a7e1fa07238da2994be9d38f266b
samba-test-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
e67d6b84ad7acb2955ee72b7ee68979e8e001bb2a5d5cd54e752f6d78ee327d9
samba-test-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
cd38869a69886ec7014b529b0a5e2a8c6f5cb941544d083216de2f68d1db8abf
samba-test-libs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
410ce04c09d80f22a31d904271e83d196121736299e85e3eed33da09b5e99399
samba-vfs-glusterfs-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
fee2103b6ba68f134bc8d706313e6d873b9ef2d803cbcb27234da184bd579eb1
samba-winbind-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
4e82685863559181e2fb19cd0ab050ce5c0cc72aee0aa23484c3c8bd3233a2ae
samba-winbind-clients-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
5cadd6d1e44a896802e1df30ac84a484345f572bfaaa938544b43458dc6d80bd
samba-winbind-krb5-locator-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
4a0c264159f020e612793ba279b544a49c67ce5644e4673d6a1b7e01986d8c98
samba-winbind-modules-4.10.16-13.el7_9.i686.rpm
dfe0da66e34f229040771968adc12e53f3ef8575433da409ecd46a284495677e
samba-winbind-modules-4.10.16-13.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b088a5c6032151b45b682b6116ad99c0b8c1d583fde4bea8ed276010c2d095fd
samba-4.10.16-13.el7_9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0858 CentOS 7 resource-agents BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0858
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0858
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
b471f99ddcb78e386e77a4c7bf4a814b35fce51259b2f34d2daa9be4e09d6e98
resource-agents-4.1.1-61.el7_9.8.x86_64.rpm
980d1c1b856c308eb7fb1dc1f32d4d5d9828a5ac152037e4fcb99050874e9506
resource-agents-aliyun-4.1.1-61.el7_9.8.x86_64.rpm
259d7d947d78e3105849ae7a9929d030e772e103b7c652d987701a6a7d08f78d
resource-agents-gcp-4.1.1-61.el7_9.8.x86_64.rpm
Source:
bad3024aef5c140e975908a34299a104ebbaf4b0926aee76f738bf3db6a79ee4
resource-agents-4.1.1-61.el7_9.8.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0859 CentOS 7 libstoragemgmt BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0859
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0859
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
a274a7c3d1ef8019b71132c4a6eb6e5a8363b7b085140da95747f86c10af
libstoragemgmt-1.8.1-2.el7_9.i686.rpm
cc499773d5b8e2ef0f1585f8f54cda5bdf26720005e766f1ad4fa13b420b5f7a
libstoragemgmt-1.8.1-2.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
5cdd011988bd5f786fd69bb2f85ee35ad72937f71784e3c1b95f7eaad14b4e71
libstoragemgmt-arcconf-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
124996a9073a9ca8c3f0c37ffc32039a2cdb8a8eb5ae0de982fc65de11708c2c
libstoragemgmt-devel-1.8.1-2.el7_9.i686.rpm
5e7c13e7ca9ceba3ee4769206f16397f62fe367684d347573b551f0ff2c8fd6d
libstoragemgmt-devel-1.8.1-2.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
00ee764e0982d01d4e6bb4be901fe9d45e00ba81aada6ca3196a2f4c6a633f63
libstoragemgmt-hpsa-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
f8d5011b3c0674720d0b3957a9b73860210ff186379452e0225431f7619a349f
libstoragemgmt-local-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
a2e16e3449f1d216456cce32c996514ef5ca92cbe8e4e01823b44edb2054748f
libstoragemgmt-megaraid-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
02f39c31f6b85c556cb651767e2383c2bac89bab5627ec18df62fd758577a348
libstoragemgmt-nfs-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
22a2f90a540cd9a8330a6a4c96da322865926757812e4c0fdfea538a351e6f5a
libstoragemgmt-nfs-plugin-clibs-1.8.1-2.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
c3e8755371c95986d3d9b24ce2a85e7158f92f26160148570b73b95ab7cc341c
libstoragemgmt-nstor-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
b18eeaf97c8e575f6c91cac0852221503010783f1b05f5c71ba0566e0569c473
libstoragemgmt-python-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
7c5dcd2035ff3f4503debbaeecc9659798c5a4cc8626f9cb089451584f53fefc
libstoragemgmt-python-clibs-1.8.1-2.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
c4ae76d7c6a23e9345f969ab95acd6dee04900b227f0de925cc539ffeb60c2e7
libstoragemgmt-smis-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
16cc8bcd9289899b14393eedecdb5d31b11e6a4d0c504f593037804de5878fce
libstoragemgmt-targetd-plugin-1.8.1-2.el7_9.noarch.rpm
5eaba3f50062813592c389ebb343e248af7f03caee550d7cab3599bd3e6847d4
libstoragemgmt-udev-1.8.1-2.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0b297acba21f17cb8883d029d0dc219c3592e54f96a1a396b680e5c7015eb9d1
libstoragemgmt-1.8.1-2.el7_9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2021:0869 CentOS 7 java-11-openjdk BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2021:0869
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0869
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
322851c3e3042c4bb07d4bb68b94af8a35852bcac51ee3546cab4f53bc08392b
java-11-openjdk-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
0768c02eab146e2f88cb0c3f41aee2d4f7b14dbdde274b3955f2155eb21cf944
java-11-openjdk-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
47f52ae65081a918aa822fb28261dafe5b707b012d7f07714f3beff7a4d49f45
java-11-openjdk-demo-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
6eb48672224acb21d0dbc83835af74ba98ee85d8e9d3991623af2bc0d57d6761
java-11-openjdk-demo-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
62730a490f70fb743015316019c09c1992ef54947750f054eaaf08ff9a387163
java-11-openjdk-devel-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
6b0ef069c7763a3ba0b61d3804a6919fa06467de6088cbbcda7c568dfc3309b0
java-11-openjdk-devel-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
0de12d2701881f7f8bd093302babcb112ad65af4943bd2e0d2bcb2884f12012d
java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
33ead8c29c4da7be1c35398bea14adbd1069eb04196df8a75ddffab71562e778
java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
e78824bc6d2ccd3f5942b851ce6c3323367ca0cfa615dc8c95158aee19c123fe
java-11-openjdk-javadoc-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
c77e3e9c9f9cc48a40bb188838bad833e1ea361ee0ba3424abed546f3945d701
java-11-openjdk-javadoc-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
115dde7a103bd42e620ddd732d36ef609984603c7103f803f2d1d8bac1bef6c9
java-11-openjdk-javadoc-zip-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
74c5d742dbaa75738c5c52f77416c65b88472bdd5eafe0c39fe63d1816522476
java-11-openjdk-javadoc-zip-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
7efe56d9bcad9ff6dc145a50baf931d2125888da4d984a84fd14a509862f3751
java-11-openjdk-jmods-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
58b23e3f8226650315902eba6ab9e2d2a81f816aa85d12cebf74af56a8504c16
java-11-openjdk-jmods-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
fed1a25dff437173e5198969384d287e1c91872362d72445cda5bf8bc78201f5
java-11-openjdk-src-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
03861872c0b045970aa5d709fc96b48dc78114b5fe454d59dff316eb4753ec08
java-11-openjdk-src-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
50a577d62eed91a0ed5c686f85830b3c9252dff331c94841f673d8f19924250d
java-11-openjdk-static-libs-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.i686.rpm
01b83fa31f2e2ed972aa491423479df2e3e026e54668e3933d3b8b1803fe208b
java-11-openjdk-static-libs-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
Source:
332a4760c95b3023ffe95559c70e49bc30e02493bbacb943892d4ac3360c87d3
java-11-openjdk-11.0.10.0.9-1.el7_9.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote: I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing these data files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps incorrectly, assuming that the publisher of the data would be one with said stylesheet. (Although perhaps that is something an end-user could put together as well??) Some high-profile XML schemata (e.g., DocBook) have published stylesheets, but mostly I've written my own. I have a very trivial example in a blog post from several years ago: https://www.madboa.com/blog/2014/09/10/strip-rss/ (My site is completely non-commercial. I gain nothing by you visiting it -- or ignoring it.) -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45.38° N, 122.59° W ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Lamar Owen wrote: On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [what can be done] I am guessing someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages to try and make it fit in single density. This is probably the solution at this point for the 'Full' DVD. In the interim, older machines such as this should just use the 'Minimal' DVD, since it fits on single-layer nicely. (I hear or read single-density and think FM encoding, 128 bytes per sector, 77-track IBM 3740 format 8 inch floppies..which are still in use in certain places...) Same for 8.x or 8 Stream -- oh, wait, there is no 'Minimal' ISO, so net install or USB is it, can't use optical media at all. I see at least two other possibilities, supergrub and making the .iso file into a partition. I've tried to boot fedora .iso partitions, both with and without success. That said, OP is using the netinstall version. I'd expect that to be more reiable than either of my suggestions. I'd have tried that before asking the list. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On 3/18/2021 6:36 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not allowed on premises. While all DVD-ROM drives are supposed to read DL media, in practice the compatibility has not proven to be 100%. ___ You can safely assume that a DVD+/-R written to by an admin and read in by a DVD-ROM is a one-way vector at that data transmission level, with nothing beyond the bits happening. If your USB ports are sealed with epoxy, USB is indeed not an option... and that's a feature, not a bug. -jc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script
On 03/18/2021 04:30 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote:
>
>> I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on.
>>
>> I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the web where
>> the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance but is different
>> between the various data files. I then plan to extract the various data
>> items ("elements?") from each data file, do some light formatting and then
>> save desired parts of each original data file as a formatted CSV-file for
>> later importing into a database.
>>
>> As the plan is to use a bash shell script using curl to get the files, I
>> have begun looking at external XML parsers that I can call from my script,
>> perhaps specify which elements I want, get the data back in some kind of
>> bash data structure and finally format and save as CSV-files.
>>
>> There seems to be a number of XML parsers available but perhaps someone on
>> the list has a recommendation for which one might suit my needs best? I
>> should add that I am running CentOS 7.
>
> Will you be using an XSLT stylesheet to do the work? There's a somewhat steep
> learning curve, but in my experience it's the most reliable method for
> parsing XML except in the very simplest of cases.
>
> In that case, the libxslt stuff may be what you want:
>
> http://xmlsoft.org/libxslt/
>
> The command-line tool is xsltproc.
>
> Again, it's not easy to use, but once you've built a toolchain, it will be
> reliable and fairly easy to modify if the source XML schema change.
>
I just checked and I cannot see that the organization publishing these data
files offer any XSLT stylesheet. IOW, I am, perhaps incorrectly, assuming that
the publisher of the data would be one with said stylesheet. (Although perhaps
that is something an end-user could put together as well??)
Although the data format of each data series is unique, it is simple and could
conceivably be parsed using grep but I am looking for a more "forward-looking"
solution for other applications in the future.
If XSLT stylesheets are not available - would you suggest another tool? Or,
would you suggest I design sheets, presumably one for for each data series?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
> At 11:47 AM 3/18/2021, you wrote: >>On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote: >> > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the >> > distribution on a bootable USB key. >> >>I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security >>updates for 7.3, you're going to end up with 7.9 + patches, so why are >>you making your life difficult and installing such an old release? >> >>If a vendor is telling you that you have to run a particular version, >>perhaps you should consider finding another vendor, the baseline 7.3 >>has a lot of glaring vulnerabilities in it that are readily >>exploitable. >> >>-- >>Jonathan Billings >>___ >>CentOS mailing list >>CentOS@centos.org >>https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > One reason might be that somewhere between 7.3 and 7.9, Centos ceased > being bootable on Apple hardware. At least that failure occurred for > me on two machines. > > David > But he was talking about a server, something that Apple doesn't have for a long time now. Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XML parsing in shell script
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, H wrote:
I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on.
I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the
web where the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance
but is different between the various data files. I then plan to
extract the various data items ("elements?") from each data file, do
some light formatting and then save desired parts of each original
data file as a formatted CSV-file for later importing into a
database.
As the plan is to use a bash shell script using curl to get the
files, I have begun looking at external XML parsers that I can call
from my script, perhaps specify which elements I want, get the data
back in some kind of bash data structure and finally format and save
as CSV-files.
There seems to be a number of XML parsers available but perhaps
someone on the list has a recommendation for which one might suit my
needs best? I should add that I am running CentOS 7.
Will you be using an XSLT stylesheet to do the work? There's a
somewhat steep learning curve, but in my experience it's the most
reliable method for parsing XML except in the very simplest of cases.
In that case, the libxslt stuff may be what you want:
http://xmlsoft.org/libxslt/
The command-line tool is xsltproc.
Again, it's not easy to use, but once you've built a toolchain, it
will be reliable and fairly easy to modify if the source XML schema
change.
--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45.38° N, 122.59° W
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
At 11:47 AM 3/18/2021, you wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote: > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the > distribution on a bootable USB key. I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security updates for 7.3, you're going to end up with 7.9 + patches, so why are you making your life difficult and installing such an old release? If a vendor is telling you that you have to run a particular version, perhaps you should consider finding another vendor, the baseline 7.3 has a lot of glaring vulnerabilities in it that are readily exploitable. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos One reason might be that somewhere between 7.3 and 7.9, Centos ceased being bootable on Apple hardware. At least that failure occurred for me on two machines. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
On 3/18/21 1:47 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote: >> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the >> distribution on a bootable USB key. > > I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security > updates for 7.3, you're going to end up with 7.9 + patches, so why are > you making your life difficult and installing such an old release? > > If a vendor is telling you that you have to run a particular version, > perhaps you should consider finding another vendor, the baseline 7.3 > has a lot of glaring vulnerabilities in it that are readily > exploitable. > I am not even 7.3 sure that is available for RHEL-7 at this point with security. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 04:44:18PM -, Mark Woolfson wrote: > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the > distribution on a bootable USB key. I know this comes up on the list quite often, but if you want security updates for 7.3, you're going to end up with 7.9 + patches, so why are you making your life difficult and installing such an old release? If a vendor is telling you that you have to run a particular version, perhaps you should consider finding another vendor, the baseline 7.3 has a lot of glaring vulnerabilities in it that are readily exploitable. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] XML parsing in shell script
I have a challenge I am interested in getting feedback on.
I will on a regular basis download a series of data files from the web where
the data is in XML-format. The format is known in advance but is different
between the various data files. I then plan to extract the various data items
("elements?") from each data file, do some light formatting and then save
desired parts of each original data file as a formatted CSV-file for later
importing into a database.
As the plan is to use a bash shell script using curl to get the files, I have
begun looking at external XML parsers that I can call from my script, perhaps
specify which elements I want, get the data back in some kind of bash data
structure and finally format and save as CSV-files.
There seems to be a number of XML parsers available but perhaps someone on the
list has a recommendation for which one might suit my needs best? I should add
that I am running CentOS 7.
Thank you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Mark Woolfson wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I wonder if you could help. >> >> >> >> I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the >> distribution on a bootable USB key. >> >> >> > What kind of server? This is a hardware issue and is going to need to know > what kind of CPU and what the firmware on the system is. My uninformed > guess is that the kernel is finding a large number of CPUs (either virtual > or real) and it is probably only fixed by the kernel/software in 7.4. [A > test would be to see if 7.2 also has this issue and if not then walk > through the kernels until it does.. then look at the change logs for when > it starts working again.] > > Or I would try installing with a smaller number of CPUs with a command > line > entry like > > maxcpus=16 (if this system has 82+?) > > >> >> CentOS boots to the first menu but when I select the option to install >> almost immediately I get the error below: >> >> >> >> NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#82 stuck for 23s! >> [system-udevd:1221] Is this an AMD system? I remember such a message somehow but don't know where I saw it. Can it be that the system is newer than what was supported with CentOS 7.3? Regards, Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Mark Woolfson wrote: > Hello, > > > > I wonder if you could help. > > > > I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the > distribution on a bootable USB key. > > > What kind of server? This is a hardware issue and is going to need to know what kind of CPU and what the firmware on the system is. My uninformed guess is that the kernel is finding a large number of CPUs (either virtual or real) and it is probably only fixed by the kernel/software in 7.4. [A test would be to see if 7.2 also has this issue and if not then walk through the kernels until it does.. then look at the change logs for when it starts working again.] Or I would try installing with a smaller number of CPUs with a command line entry like maxcpus=16 (if this system has 82+?) > > CentOS boots to the first menu but when I select the option to install > almost immediately I get the error below: > > > > NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#82 stuck for 23s! [system-udevd:1221] > > > > The above error is output every 23s > > > > This is a repeatable error condition. > > > > When I load CentOS 7.4 on to the server I get no problems. > > > > When I load the above CentOS 7.3 distribution on to an older server I get > no > problems. > > > > Has anyone every seen the NMI watchdog error and found a resolution. > > > > Thank you in advance, > > Mark > > > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.3
Hello, I wonder if you could help. I have a requirement to load CentOS 7.3 on to a server. I have the distribution on a bootable USB key. CentOS boots to the first menu but when I select the option to install almost immediately I get the error below: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#82 stuck for 23s! [system-udevd:1221] The above error is output every 23s This is a repeatable error condition. When I load CentOS 7.4 on to the server I get no problems. When I load the above CentOS 7.3 distribution on to an older server I get no problems. Has anyone every seen the NMI watchdog error and found a resolution. Thank you in advance, Mark -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 10:56, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > [what can be done] I am guessing > > someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some > packages to try and make it fit in single density. > > > This is probably the solution at this point for the 'Full' DVD. In the > interim, older machines such as this should just use the 'Minimal' DVD, > since it fits on single-layer nicely. (I hear or read single-density > and think FM encoding, 128 bytes per sector, 77-track IBM 3740 format 8 > inch floppies..which are still in use in certain places...) Same > for 8.x or 8 Stream -- oh, wait, there is no 'Minimal' ISO, so net > install or USB is it, can't use optical media at all. > > https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-2009.iso There is a 7.9 minimal. There was no 8 minimal because composing is harder and the 'minimum' set of packages did not shave off a lot of disk space. > You're right; we're rabbit-holing. Being at a non-profit, I have to > rabbit hole a lot, since I tend to use much older hardware than 'normal.' > Understood. This is where the modern OS assumptions of 'you should be in the cloud' and/or the 'your hardware must be only this old to be used' cause a hard fork with parts of the community. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On 3/14/21 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking > system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing > front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a > bug on my behalf? Particulars: > > "CentOS 7.9.2009 DVD iso image too large" > > ISO image: CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-2009.iso 4.7GB raw CD image > Wed Nov 4 05:37:25 2020 > Burners: Both K3B and Brasero > Media: Both DVD-R and DVD+R single-layer disks > > iso image: 4,712,300,544 bytes > User Anthony F McInerney advises Wikipedia says > DVD-R capacity: 4,707,319,808 bytes (max) > > I have tried burning this same iso image on two different machines: a > CentOS 7.9 server and a Fedora 33 laptop. Same failure on both. > > We need to ask the developers to make a re-spin that's about 5MB > smaller. And before someone suggests it, the 2010-vintage server I'm > trying to install CentOS on does not support booting from a thumb > drive, so that option is not available. > > Thanks, > > --Doc Savage > Fairview Heights, IL Guys .. In order to do a full install set, we need a certain set of packages. This set of packages is pretty much set in stone (you need all the deps to do every install in the comps set). I can not really adjust this package set unless we take some items off the installer. This means that the DVD is indeed too big for some media. If you are having issues and you HAVE to use a DVD and can not use a usb key .. please use the minimal ISO or the NetInstall ISO instead. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On 3/18/21 10:23 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: [what can be done] I am guessing someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages to try and make it fit in single density. This is probably the solution at this point for the 'Full' DVD. In the interim, older machines such as this should just use the 'Minimal' DVD, since it fits on single-layer nicely. (I hear or read single-density and think FM encoding, 128 bytes per sector, 77-track IBM 3740 format 8 inch floppies..which are still in use in certain places...) Same for 8.x or 8 Stream -- oh, wait, there is no 'Minimal' ISO, so net install or USB is it, can't use optical media at all. You're right; we're rabbit-holing. Being at a non-profit, I have to rabbit hole a lot, since I tend to use much older hardware than 'normal.' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 09:36, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to > > boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. > There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not > allowed on premises. > > While all DVD-ROM drives are supposed to read DL media, in practice the > compatibility has not proven to be 100%. > ___ > I think we are rabbit-holing on a bunch of related issues: 1. "How old hardware should be expected to work." Again this is not the core issue the original person was asking. Upstream (RHEL) usually expects hardware that is confirmed to work to be usable through the release time. This hardware is usually on the year of release to 4 years afterwards. So RHEL-7 was released in 2014, so tested hardware configurations from 2014-2018 should work. Outside of that there are some work to make it work but the rules from online docs seem to be that if the hardware was from before 2012 and not a tested configuration, it should stick to RHEL-6. [This is mostly about a level of support that would be given point of view.. sure you could get it to work on a 2004 computer.. but if it breaks support is not going to spend hours/days/weeks trying to make it work. Consulting services are for that..] CentOS has no support levels so if it works cool. if it doesn't then sorry. That goes for any dot release. If something is not caught in testing when various dot releases are being built.. that's too bad. [This isn't a new thing.. we didn't respin 5 releases when something wasn't caught until months later.] Also this is not really related to the original person's problem. It worked for them for many different releases and doesn't now. 2. "What are expected release results?" This is what the original question falls into. They have been running under the assumption that one set of DVD's would fall under a limit size for the single density drives. It has worked for multiple releases before 7.9 and then it didn't. However that expectation does not seem to have been in the testing procedures as a 'halt' level problem (i.e. measured in testing and then sent back if failed.) I will be honest on my part, I have only done a 'looks' good enough as I don't have single density DVD's to test if it worked or not. I use USB sticks and virtual machines. I am expecting the other testers to have done the same thing. 3. "What can be done". This is what the original question needs answered. This was not caught in the release of 7.9 and that was a while ago. There are not going to be any more dot releases for 7.. there is no planned 7.10 so this is the final set of DVD's until 2024. At this moment, I don't know if a respin will make the images small enough and what would have to be dropped to make it fit. Respinning 'official images' now will also cause problems for a lot of mirrors and users who will ask 'did these images get hacked? why did it change now?' [And in either case, the original person needed this fixed yesterday, not in the 2+ weeks to do this.] I am guessing someone could make an unofficial set of spins which cut out some packages to try and make it fit in single density. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
On 3/18/21 1:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. There are environments where USB or other writeable media are not allowed on premises. While all DVD-ROM drives are supposed to read DL media, in practice the compatibility has not proven to be 100%. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
> On Mar 18, 2021, at 7:30 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > > At Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:24:51 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have >>> never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was >>> released without any release notes advising it was oversized >> >> The size issue with single-layer media has been a known issue since the >> CentOS-6 days and the release notes very much do mention it, or at least >> they did at one point. >> >> It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to >> boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. > > Or really any "PC". My 2009 vintage desktop "PC" motherboard can boot from > USB. It has the original BIOS. To add to that: it would be unreasonable to expect from “binary replica” distribution to compose DVDs (or CDs) differently from upstream vendor. Therefore, media size may end up larger than limit. Valeri >> >> >> John > > -- > Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 > Deepwoods Software-- Custom Software Services > http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services > hel...@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
All of this could be avoided with a simple external disk reader like this: https://www.amazon.com/Portable-External-Optical-Touch-Screen-Recorder/dp/B084WS3DHR/ref=sr_1_8?dchild=1=EAIaIQobChMIzNfR3PW57wIVkb3ACh0kqwzLEAAYASAAEgJQvPD_BwE=177198149510=c=9019301=g=e=1400606177523862771=kwd-10430955625=18062_9813221=external+dual-layer+dvd+burner=1616073225=electronics=1-8 On 3/18/2021 12:24 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was released without any release notes advising it was oversized The size issue with single-layer media has been a known issue since the CentOS-6 days and the release notes very much do mention it, or at least they did at one point. It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. John -- Christopher Wensink IS Administrator Five Star Plastics, Inc 1339 Continental Drive Eau Claire, WI 54701 Office: 715-831-1682 Mobile: 715-563-3112 Fax: 715-831-6075 cwens...@five-star-plastics.com www.five-star-plastics.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks
At Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:24:51 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:42:40PM -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: > > > > I'm sure it would, but I thought I made it clear that DL or BluRay have > > never been options in this case. I'm disappointed that the DVD iso was > > released without any release notes advising it was oversized > > The size issue with single-layer media has been a known issue since the > CentOS-6 days and the release notes very much do mention it, or at least > they did at one point. > > It's not realistic to expect server-class machines not to be able to > boot from dual-layer or USB media in 2021. Or really any "PC". My 2009 vintage desktop "PC" motherboard can boot from USB. It has the original BIOS. > > > > > > > John -- Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 Deepwoods Software-- Custom Software Services http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services hel...@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
