Re: [CentOS] vice.com and firefox
On 11/4/21 6:33 PM, edward via CentOS wrote: On 11/4/21 11:19 AM, mark wrote: Ok, last month, anyway, version of firefox. (Yeah, I know, time to update). 100% of the time, any link, anywhere, to vice.com gives me "network protocol violation". Anyone else seen this? Tutorial provides methods that may help to resolve the "network protocol violation / error" if they continue? https://ostechnix.com/how-to-fix-network-protocol-error-on-mozilla-firefox/ If I delete cookies, it sometimes works. The same is true with Lowes, and I see Costco (but not Home Despot). mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data
Zitat von Gordon Messmer : On 11/4/21 09:23, Ralf Prengel wrote: has anyone a working tutoring how to migrate a centos 7 system from mbr to gpt without loosing data. Do you mean the boot volume, or some other disk? I think your ability to do this, in any scenario, will depend heavily on your partition alignment. Where does your first partition begin? ___ Hallo, solved. ttps://polarclouds.co.uk/mbr-gpt-no-data-loss/ Ich tried it using disk sda for fisr tests. Using sdb as a non boot disk worked. Thanks for yours answer. Ralf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vice.com and firefox
On 11/4/21 11:19 AM, mark wrote: Ok, last month, anyway, version of firefox. (Yeah, I know, time to update). 100% of the time, any link, anywhere, to vice.com gives me "network protocol violation". Anyone else seen this? Tutorial provides methods that may help to resolve the "network protocol violation / error" if they continue? https://ostechnix.com/how-to-fix-network-protocol-error-on-mozilla-firefox/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG responsibilities
On 11/4/21 15:15, Shaun McCance wrote: Hi all, I'm working on revamping the Documentation SIG wiki page, and hoping to present where we stand to the CentOS board at some point. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation I'd like to have a set of core responsibilities. Proposal: * Working with the Red Hat documentation folks on publishing material upstreamed from RHEL. * Identifying, writing, and maintaining content aside from stuff that is intended for RHEL, whether that's in manuals or shorter form wiki material. * Periodically auditing and pruning old and outdated documentation. * Promoting CentOS documentation as a reliable source of information for CentOS and enterprise Linux in general. * Working with translators to make documentation available in languages other than English. * Working with other special interest groups on their documentation needs and helping them create, maintain, and integrate their own content. I think this is covered under "reliable" and "pruning old and outdated", but I'd love to see someone take charge of doing a complete audit of the wiki and making it correct and authoritative. It has become a bit of a pile of "might be right, sometimes" over the past decade, and it's challenging to find anything in it. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG responsibilities
Hi all, I'm working on revamping the Documentation SIG wiki page, and hoping to present where we stand to the CentOS board at some point. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation I'd like to have a set of core responsibilities. Proposal: * Working with the Red Hat documentation folks on publishing material upstreamed from RHEL. * Identifying, writing, and maintaining content aside from stuff that is intended for RHEL, whether that's in manuals or shorter form wiki material. * Periodically auditing and pruning old and outdated documentation. * Promoting CentOS documentation as a reliable source of information for CentOS and enterprise Linux in general. * Working with translators to make documentation available in languages other than English. * Working with other special interest groups on their documentation needs and helping them create, maintain, and integrate their own content. Thoughts? -- Shaun ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data
Hallo, my testsystem for training this case is a default centos7 minimal installation. Later I ve to fix a server with 10 disks and disk number 3 must be resized from 1,8 TB to 2,3 TB. If it is possible it would be ok to configure a mixed setting. Von meinem iPad gesendet > Am 04.11.2021 um 19:42 schrieb Gordon Messmer : > > On 11/4/21 09:23, Ralf Prengel wrote: >> has anyone a working tutoring how to migrate a centos 7 system from mbr to >> gpt without loosing data. > > > Do you mean the boot volume, or some other disk? > > I think your ability to do this, in any scenario, will depend heavily on your > partition alignment. Where does your first partition begin? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data
On 11/4/21 09:23, Ralf Prengel wrote: has anyone a working tutoring how to migrate a centos 7 system from mbr to gpt without loosing data. Do you mean the boot volume, or some other disk? I think your ability to do this, in any scenario, will depend heavily on your partition alignment. Where does your first partition begin? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vice.com and firefox
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 14:19:24 -0400 mark wrote: > Ok, last month, anyway, version of firefox. (Yeah, I know, time to > update). 100% of the time, any link, anywhere, to vice.com gives me > "network protocol violation". > > Anyone else seen this? Just went to vice.com with firefox-91.2.0-4.el8_4.x86_64 and it looks normal to me. No network protocol violation. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] vice.com and firefox
Ok, last month, anyway, version of firefox. (Yeah, I know, time to update). 100% of the time, any link, anywhere, to vice.com gives me "network protocol violation". Anyone else seen this? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FYI, Chrome no longer supported on Centos7.
> Date: Friday, October 22, 2021 15:25:33 -0400 > From: m...@tdiehl.org > > Hi, > > FYI, it looks like Google has decided to drop support for Chrome on > Centos 7. > > (tigger pts9) # yum install google-chrome-stable > Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, langpacks, nvidia, > priorities > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * elrepo: mirror.pit.teraswitch.com > 10 packages excluded due to repository priority protections > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package google-chrome-stable.x86_64 0:95.0.4638.54-1 will be > installed > --> Processing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.18)(64bit) for > package: google-chrome-stable-95.0.4638.54-1.x86_64 > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: google-chrome-stable-95.0.4638.54-1.x86_64 > (google-chrome) > Requires: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.18)(64bit) > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > (tigger pts9) # > The chrome beta and stable releases: google-chrome-beta.x86_64 96.0.4664.35-1 google-chrome-stable.x86_64 95.0.4638.69-1 from the google repository now install and run on centos-7 without the glibc 2.18 dependency issue showing up. I can't speak for the versions in elrepo. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos 7 mbr to gpt without loosing data
Hallo, has anyone a working tutoring how to migrate a centos 7 system from mbr to gpt without loosing data. My problem: A disk is used for docker images and niow this disk must be resized from 1,8 TB to 2,2 TB space. Three years ago when the system was installed no one thougt about this size limit. The system ist a centos 7 VM running on ESX 6.7. I found some tutorials but no one worked here. Thanka for a hint. Ralf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
