Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 6 Documentation
Am 18.12.2012 16:30, schrieb Valued Customer: Hello all. I'm wondering when the release of version 6 documentation might be out, or if the shift is to the wiki pages for this information. When going to: *https://www.centos.org/docs/ *I don't see 6 listed. Just to bring that one up again: I'm still looking for a sane toolchain to edit/diff and patch XML files. What I do have currently have is a set of automated tools to programmatically turn Upstream's documentation into something that looks more like CentOS documentation. The main problem is that all the docs have to be reviewed and we will have to edit some of them. What I need is a way to keep track of the editing that has to be done to turn the automatically processed upstream-docs into real CentOS documentation with the upstream references removed and/or updated. From time to time I had been looking around for a tool helping with that. If you (or somebody else) has a good idea just tell me. The processing chain I originally planned is: 1. Upstream XML Docs + XSLT - CentOSified XML Docs 2. CentOSified XML Docs + XML-Patches - CentOS XML Docs Part 1 is 99% done. The XSLT may need a few additional tweaks, but is is basically there (and has been for around two years now...) Part 2 is completely missing due to a lack of the right tools, time and knowledge. Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG St.-Sebastianus-Str. 5 51147 Köln Tel: +49 2203 989967-0 Fax: +49 2203 989967-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] samba3x PDC and Win XP
Am 01.08.2012 09:39, schrieb Paul R. Ganci: The samba/linux user that successfully logged in is snichols. Does anybody have a clue as to why %u is not evaluating to the linux username snichols and is getting treated simply as the string %u? I am sure it is something to stupid, but damn if I can see it. The stage at which %u needs to be evaluated in this case is before the user authentication happens. You have to use %U instead of %u - this is not a security issue as having the wrong UNC path should (and probably will) be caught using ACLs. Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG St.-Sebastianus-Str. 5 51147 Köln Tel: +49 2203 989967-0 Fax: +49 2203 989967-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 6.2 x86_64 + PHP 5.3.3 + Zend Guard Loader v3.3 == Segfault
Hello everyone, I've got issues getting Zend Guard Loader v3.3 running. Tried several installations, doesn't work for any. Once I install Zend Guard Loader my PHP CLI binary starts to segfault *at exit*. Same is true for apache processes with mod_php enabled: Works until you SIGHUP your apache processes. Doing that your webserver quits with a segfault. Can anyone reproduce that issue? Does anyone know a way to work around it? Thank you very much! Regards, Andreas -- SNIP -- $ php -v PHP 5.3.3 (cli) (built: Jul 3 2012 16:53:21) Copyright (c) 1997-2010 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Zend Technologies with Zend Guard Loader v3.3, Copyright (c) 1998-2010, by Zend Technologies Segmentation fault $ php -m [PHP Modules] bcmath bz2 calendar Core ctype curl date dom ereg exif fileinfo filter ftp gd gettext gmp hash iconv json libxml mbstring mysql mysqli openssl pcntl pcre PDO pdo_mysql pdo_sqlite Phar readline Reflection session shmop SimpleXML sockets SPL sqlite3 standard tokenizer wddx xml xmlreader xmlwriter xsl Zend Guard Loader zip zlib [Zend Modules] Zend Guard Loader Segmentation fault -- SNIP -- -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG St.-Sebastianus-Str. 5 51147 Köln Tel: +49 2203 989967-0 Fax: +49 2203 989967-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kmod-nvidia?
Am 20.07.2012 16:44, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: I just went to install kmod-nvidia on a 64-bit CentOS 6.2 system... and enabling elrepo, yum can't find it. There's a page for it, but that was last updated last year, and there are also references to packages for older Nvidia cards, but not the current. What do I not know? You seem to have missed the fact that Nvidia sucks :) At least on our elrepo mirror site there are recent kmod-nvidia packages. The Package kmod-nvidia-295.59-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm is just a few days old. Maybe your yum configuration went bad? Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG St.-Sebastianus-Str. 5 51147 Köln Tel: +49 2203 989967-0 Fax: +49 2203 989967-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] Images for CentOS Documentation
Am 10.03.2011 00:16, schrieb Ralph Angenendt: Am 09.03.11 10:45, schrieb Andreas Rogge: The SVG has text inside. Can you convert the text into pathes so it doesn't break when viewed without the Denmark font installed? Sure. It's on people.centos.org now. Great! Thanks. I just spent a few hours on figuring out how RH made the svg-logo work correctly with their HTML because my in my adaption there are scrollbars. Eventually it turned out to be broken on docs.r.c, too :) -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Images for CentOS Documentation
I'm currently porting the public and free parts of Red Hat Documentation to CentOS. Being unable to do anything graphics-related, I need someone to provide the following images: logo.svg300x140 CentOS Logo image_left.png 124x39 CentOS Logo image_right.png 120x41 CentOS Documentation Logo (to be designed) Thank you! Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Ltd. Co. KG Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS] How to create a tun-device with CentOS packages only?
Hello List, I've got a somewhat weird question. Let me tell you what my intent is first: We're running a set of Dell boxes with CentOS 4. Some of them use OpenVPN. As we need to monitor the system status of these boxes, we use the Dell supplied OMSA package. As it turns out, OMSA totally breaks if you've got one or more tun devices configured. AFAICT Dell denies support with that issue, because OpenVPN is a third-party add-on. Now instead of discussing with Dell for hours, I'd like to reproduce the issue without OpenVPN which brings me to my question: How can I create a tun device without using any add on packages using only software contained in CentOS? Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to create a tun-device with CentOS packages only?
Jason Pyeron schrieb: Stabbing in the dark here, but does: mknod /dev/net/tun c 10 200 Or other partial steps you can think of cause the issue? Not at all. The omcliproxy binary from OMSA starts to segfault once there is any tun netdevice. If I destroy the tun devices, it works fine again. -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to create a tun-device with CentOS packages only?
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 08:15 -0400 schrieb Jason Pyeron: So to get a clarification, because I am dense. Do you need to have the drivers insmoded or just have the /dev entries to make OMSA crash? Neither, I can have the driver loaded and in /dev/net/tun. The problem only arises once you create a tun-device (i.e. openvpn --mktun --dev tun1) and vanishes when you remove it again. Remember your request was to find a supported config that causes OMSA to not work, so they fix it. I finally found another way: it also fails if there's a ppp device, so it can be reproduced with supported stuff: Call pppd, call omreport and see it die. Thank you for your help! Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix and mail origin checks
hi, Whats the 'robust' way to make sure email to a specific destination is only accepted if it came over the localhost:25 or /usr/sbin/sendmail route ? anything else should get a 5xx error. Emails to other destinations should remain unaffected. I guess you should need to configure two incoming variant in master.cf, so you have one smtpd listening for localhost and one on the real ip. For the one on the real ip you just set a recipient restriction that disallows your specific destination (directly in master.cf itself). I didn't test, but it should work. Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] potsfix keeping mail in queue on delivery error
Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 14:37 +0200 schrieb Robert Grasso: Hello, Our mail server is running CentOS 5.3. I configured postfix with maildrop as the MDA. I had to deal with a strange issue : a user sent an email to an alias, which resolves into several internal addresses. One of these addresses had its mbox filled up (reached the mailbox_size_limit); so maildrop reported a 0x19 error code to postfix, who kept the mail in its queue, and repeatedly resent the email : thus every member of the alias list received many copies of this email, except of course the one with the filled mbox. Is there a way to configure postfix so that it does not resend the email to the recipients who do not report any error ? We run Postfix + Cyrus and a some of our users are often over quota. Using virtual alias maps in postfix for aliases, leads to the following effect: the mail is splitted by postfix and then requeued for a evety recipient of the alias (not the alias itself). If submission fails (e.g. over quota), then the mail stays in the queue and submission is retried regularly. As the mail was already splitted before the submission attempt to the mailbox, only the mail for the mailbox that's failing is kept in the queue. Hope that helps... Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSH attacks from china
Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 19:45 +0100 schrieb Miguel Medalha: I moved the ssh port from the standard 22 to a high port. The attempts to break into my servers disappeared. The logs are clean now. I would advise you to do the same. Choose a high ( 1024) unused port and configure the clients accordingly. *cough* A port 1024 for SSH? Actually that means that if your sshd dies every normal user can start to listen on that port with watever they want. Of course, there is still the host key. However, AFAICT most normal users just ignore host key changes... Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question on hwclock
A Virtual Machine? These often don't have their own hwclock... Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 21:08 -0500 schrieb Jerry Geis: this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
