Re: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Pouar <thepo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm pretty sure that's a variant of the Almquist Shell You would be correct. All of the BSDs and some GNU/Linux distributions use Almquist for sh if not using a symlink to bash or dash. In fact, the first release of Slackware in 1993 had sh as a symlink to bash. I'm looking at the source code for the Bourne shell as included with UNIX SVR4 (circa 1988) and it's obvious that the version which Sun Microsystems/Oracle shipped with Solaris under the CDDL is a direct decedent. The license on the source code for the Bourne shell shipped with SVR4 clearly states: "THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT" Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen <rkam...@kampensonline.com> wrote: > Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers have set up these fingerprint > keys - 1%, maybe 2%, so how do you code for that? I guess I'm thinking it > uses it if available. So even if you do post it on your DNS, how many > clients out there are using DANE on their set up? By the time it becomes > more than a tiny % and generally useful, it will be in CentOS 8. It also > requires certificates to be implemented more ubiquitously than at present - > although we do now have affordable solutions, so this one may resolve more > quickly. I hope my prior comments weren't too off topic but a lot of people don't seem to understand the purpose for an enterprise distribution. DANE is a perfect example of this. Go poll the SMTP servers for any company on the S 500 and I can almost guarantee that 99.9% of them will not have TLSA records for DANE. It's a new/emerging technology. The same is true with DNSSEC (which is actually quite old). Enterprises are typically behind in the technology they adopt. Stability and reliability are paramount. This is where RHEL and CentOS come in. I know of a few companies listed on the S 500 who still have SSLv3 turned on to allow customers with old versions of Internet Explorer on Windows XP to connect. You can't simply assume everyone is using the latest technology. This is the reason IBM loves System z. Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: > Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements it. You can thank the hatred of DNSSEC for that. Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Alice Wonder <al...@domblogger.net> wrote: > That is the only reliable way to avoid MITM with SMTP. Except I can just strip STARTTLS and most MTAs will continue to connect. Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Tony Molloy <tony.mol...@ul.ie> wrote: > So any ideas. I may have missed this but what model laptop are we talking about? Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Philip V <pv.bugzilla+cen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any advice? Output of rfkill list? Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 laptop wireless Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (rev c4)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Philip V <pv.bugzilla+cen...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. How do I get this working? I am happy to work with command line tools. Could you post the output of: dmesg | grep iwlwifi Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 SELinux issue
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Frank Cox <thea...@melvilletheatre.com> wrote: > Turns out you get the "Could not downgrade policy file > /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24" error if you're running with SELinux > disabled and something tries to install or reload policy: semodule -vR does > it. This is why if anyone is opposed to running SELinux it should be left in permissive mode. Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HDD badblocks
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.gar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure what's going on with your drive. But if it were mine, I'd want > to replace it. If there are issues, that long smart check ought to turn up > something, and in my experience, that's enough for a manufacturer to do a > warranty replacement. I agree with Matt. Go ahead and run a few of the S.M.A.R.T. tests. I can almost guarantee based off of your description of your problem that they will fail. badblocks(8) is a very antiquated tool. Almost every hard drive has a few bad sectors from the factory. Very old hard drives used to have a list of the bad sectors printed on the front of the label. When you first created a filesystem you had to enter all of the bad sectors from the label so that the filesystem wouldn't store data there. Years later, more bad sectors would form and you could enter them into the filesystem by discovering them using a tool like badblocks(8). Today, drives do all of this work automatically. The manufacturer of a hard drive will scan the entire surface and write the bad sectors into a section of the hard drive's electronics known as the P-list. The controller on the drive will automatically remap these sectors to a small area of unused sectors set aside for this very purpose. Later if more bad sectors form, hard drives when they see a bad sector will enter it into a list known as the G-list and then remap this sector to other sectors in the unused area of the drive I mentioned earlier. Basically under normal conditions, the end user should NEVER see bad sectors from their perspective. If badblocks(8) is reporting bad sectors, it is very likely that enough bad sectors have formed to the point where the unused reserved sectors is depleted of replacement sectors. While in theory you could run badblocks(8) and pass it to the filesystem, I can ensure you that the growth of bad sectors at this point has reached a point in which it will continue. I'd stop using that hard drive, pull any important data, and then proceed to run S.M.A.R.T. tests so if the drive is under warranty you can have it replaced. Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MATE question
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Fred Smith <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > Anyone know what I've missed (or messed) ? It might be an issue with a version mismatch of configuration files and settings. I'd log out of the graphical environment, switch to a text console (or boot to a non-graphical systemd target) and attempt to reset the MATE settings for your user. mv ~/.config/mate ~/.config/mate_old Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NFS problem after 7.2
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Mark2015 <mark2...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > What to do? Looks like upstream is working on it [1]. According to the BZ, the solution for now is to downgrade nfs-utils [2]. Brandon Vincent [1] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2065873 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=1285097 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hostname service?
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeova...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that I couldn't previously find it with systemctl because it is a > "static" service, neither enabled nor disabled. What is "static" really > intended to mean here? The other static services seem to be boot-time > related for the most part, eg anaconda, pvscan A "static" service is basically one that can't be disabled. It is statically enabled by being referenced in a systemd target. > Man for hostnamectl (also new to me) indicates some potential uses for the > hostnamed-maintained names, yet I see nothing obvious making use of that > info. Can you give me an example? > Thanks for the clues.Nick Geovanis freedesktop.org has some examples of when and why the different hostnames would be used and how they're generated when the user doesn't provide more than the traditional static hostname [1]. Brandon Vincent [1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/hostnamed/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hostname service?
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeova...@gmail.com> wrote: > On CentOS 7, I find in /var/log/messages several times daily messages > "localhost systemd: Started Hostname Service.". However I can't seem to > find such a service using the systemctl command. What is the "Hostname > Service", what does it do and why is it being restarted frequently? Many > thanksNick Hi Nick, The service you are referring to is hostnamed [1]. hostnamed is designed to start on request and terminate after an idle period. Programs on your computer are probably querying the service to determine if your hostname has changed. This is normal behavior. Brandon Vincent [1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/hostnamed/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
