Re: [CentOS] load balancer recommendations
On 1/23/2013 12:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 1/23/2013 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bowie Bailey wrote: On 1/20/2013 10:12 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: You'll undoubtedly find more material on the iNet, but I hope the above may serve as a starting point. The iNet? Wow, Apple's getting into everything these days... :) I think he meant the Inet. g Missed the beginning of this thread, but if this is about serious hardware load balancers, a few years ago, where I was working, we bought one from Radware - less expensive than F5, and a very nice box, very configurable. ObBias: as I worked closely with the sales engineer setting it up, and got friendly with him, I'd be glad to get you in touch with him We're using a Foundry ServerIron. Works well for us. But the OP was asking about a software load balancer. I am a little late to the party on this one. So please excuse me if someone else has recommended HAproxy. I have been using it in a few production deployments, running it in a VM. Has been rock solid. -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] increase harddisk diskspace Failed to suspend LogVol00
On 6/2/2011 1:13 PM, Manu wrote: Hi, I want to increase my harddisk space and receive the following error # lvextend -l +323 /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 Extending logical volume LogVol00 to 48.97 GB device-mapper: reload ioctl failed: Invalid argument Failed to suspend LogVol00 Try: lvextend -L +10G /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 upper case L Looks like you have 10.09GB free. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On 4/7/2011 11:00 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 08:52, Rudi Ahlersr...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Anton Parolanton.pa...@orcsoftware.com wrote: Racism in open source software. That's the first time I've seen that. Regardless of your dislike for someone, even if legitimate, comments like that are NOT acceptable. I suggest you make a swift and sincere apology. CentOS is free, and you get what you pay for. If you don't like it, fork and make your own efforts. I am receiving more than that. In fact, I have received from the CentOS project more than what I could have payed for. And I keep getting even more through the mailing list, wiki, and forums. Every single day. These people are priceless and don't deserve to be submitted to the harshness we have been witnessing lately. I suggest we write up a blurb in the wiki or somewhere explaining the full When it's ready case --in the point of view of those responsible for the project, who's else? And then, never, ever again, answer these questions with anything but a link to that page. had to give this one a + (1 * (infinity)) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!
John Hinton wrote: All, (and please do not turn this into the next long thread) snip I am not a man of many words.. and i am usually very quiet on this list. But would just like to say that i appreciate all the CentOS team members immensely. I sincerely thank you all for the time you put in to what i consider the best free Linux distro available. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cloning a server
PA wrote: Hi, I have a centos 5 (current) mail server that I have compiled dovecot/postfix and installed some packages like mysql etc. These packages have been configured and changed to my liking. How can I now save all this and install it on another server without having to do all the work of compiling installing and configuring the same applications. Is it possible to burn this server image into multiple DVD’s make it bootable and then install on another server. Basically I want to clone this server and make it easy to install on another similar hardware server without having to install centos and then manually installing/configuring dovecot/postfix/mysql etc. Not sure if I can create a bootable ISO that will install on new servers or what my options are. I would appreciate any suggestions. Paul We use Clonezilla for this sort of thing. http://www.clonezilla.org/ Have had decent success with this. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] route question
GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 on /etc/sysconfig/network file ? Actually I have that in the ifcfg-eth1 and ifcfg-eth2. And this is hte route I get. DEVICE=eth1 ONBOOT=YES BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=74.223.8.179 NETMASK=255.255.255.240 GATEWAY=74.223.8.177 DEVICE=eth2 ONBOOT=Yes BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=24.123.23.170 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 GATEWAY=24.123.23.169 route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 24.123.23.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 00 eth2 74.223.8.1760.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 00 eth1 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth2 0.0.0.0 24.123.23.169 0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth2 I dont want 74.X traffic going out 24.X network. I want it going back out the 74.X network. How do I setup the ifcfg-eth files so the GW above will route back out the correct gw? Jerry Traffic will already route out the appropriate interface for a directly connected network. So packets to an IP on the 74.223.8.176/28 subnet should route out eth1 and packets to the 24.123.23.168/29 network will route out eth2. Are you trying to route other subnets within the 74.X.X.X out eth1? Cj ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] route question
I am trying to get my two WAN ethernet connections into one box to work. Eth2 is cable, eth1 is T1 and eth0 is office LAN. Eth2 works just fine. connections on eth1 dont seem to go anywhere. I thought it was the routing based on route -n info. I am also using iptable to preroute and postroute. What exactly does not work? Connecting to what destination IP? Your default route is pointing out eth2. So any traffic to a non-directly connected network will go out eth2. (without some additional static routes) What are you trying to accomplish? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
