Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Re: The directory that I am trying to clean up is huge]
On 1/25/10 9:33 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
When using the -exec action with the ; terminator, the constructed
command line always contains the path for exactly one matched file.
Try it. Run find /usr -exec echo {} ; and see that you get one
path per line and output begins almost instantly.
Don't forget to backspace delimit the semicolon; the proper way to get
data out of this example would be:
find /usr -exec echo {} \;
-- Corey / KB1JWQ
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce
William Warren wrote: I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system. Can i upgrade that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should i just back it up and do it from scratch? Also will the samba version in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients? Links to tips and tricks are appreciated..:) Sincerely, William Warren That's so far from supported that I wouldn't even know WHERE to begin... -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT] Urgent request
Mike A. Harris wrote: Linux didn't exist until 1991, so it would have been quite the feat to be running it in the 1980's indeed. ;o) Nonsense. My time machine runs Linux. -- Corey / KB1JWQ Member, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 2003-1944 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?
Neil Muller wrote: On 03/11/2009, at 8:06 PM, Corey Chandler wrote: ML wrote: Hi All, Is anyone versed in Zimbra? Extremely-- and I know that Zimbra is flat out not supported under CentOS, by their own decision. If this is community edition, it's a different kettle of fish entirely. I run Zimbra (commercial) on Centos for my employers and there is no problem running Zimbra on Centos or on getting support from Zimbra for Zimbra on Centos. Where did this idea of no support for Zimbra on Centos come from? Citation: http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/14116-centos-not-supported.html Based upon my experience with Zimbra (and other similar vendors), I'm a big fan of NOT having anything that they don't explicitly support touching the Zimbra box. It helps keep the fingerpointing to a minimum when things end up going wrong; if they can point to the OS as a reason to claim a box is unsupported, they will; compared to the cost of a Zimbra license, the $400 or whatnot for RHEL is inconsequential. -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tripwire Question
Al Sparks wrote: I'm trying to run tripwire on a RHEL 5.4 box. I'm new to it. RHEL != CentOS. That said, what happens when you strace tripwire? -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?
Corey Chandler wrote: Citation: http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/14116-centos-not-supported.html Er, this was updated and linked, just noticed that. But the update reads: On the issue of support, it isn’t that you can’t run CentOS, it’s just that it’s not officially supported as a part of our release and QA engineering. I'm not a fan of giving them that out to avoid supporting an issue. :-) -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?
John R Pierce wrote: indeed, and the followup links to... http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/14213-our-centos-users.html which clarifies that the CentOS4 problem in the prior bulletin turned out to be a customer-installed Perl 5.8.8 which caused problems with Scalar::Util and that in fact, stock CentOS 4.5 and 4.6 worked just fine for them. Absolutely-- but you'll note that even though the issue was customer inflicted, their FIRST response was to say CentOS isn't supported! Had the customer been running RHEL, there wouldn't have been a 50 hour delay between CentOS is the problem! and Er, looks like it was an extra package the customer had installed. Works on RHEL, you're running CentOS, while a canard in most cases, is very easy for a support organization to trot out. Of course, your mileage may vary... The real issue is, when running complex multi-faceted software systems, you really can't just update things at random and expect it to all play nicely. Obviously. :-) -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Tripwire Question
Al Sparks wrote: Here's partial output. The command I ran with strace was: strace /usr/loca/bin/tripwire -m i My apologies if this sounds like I'm doubting you, but can you paste the contents of /etc/mtab for me? -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?
ML wrote: Hi All, Is anyone versed in Zimbra? Extremely-- and I know that Zimbra is flat out not supported under CentOS, by their own decision. If this is community edition, it's a different kettle of fish entirely. I have most things working except some MTA issue. I tried posting on the Zimbra forums after reading the docs, but my post was labeled as SPAM and the moderators have not replied to my private message to get my post reviewed. Who uses this type of method for getting help anyway? Aren't the days of Bulletin Board BBS's gone? People who know how to concisely ask a question, mostly. Anyway... I installed ZCS for the first time today. Most things are running except I cannot send or receive mail. I get MTA errors. I assume that it is not running. When I send I get unable to connect to MTA. How do I diagnose the issue? in /var/log/zimbra.log: Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9282]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/spool Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9289]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.5.2z/conf/main.cf Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9290]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.5.2z/conf/master.cf Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9291]: warning: not owned by root: /opt/zimbra/postfix-2.6.5.2z/conf/master.cf.in Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9294]: warning: not owned by postfix: /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/./spool/maildrop/E18EC1C1048D Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9295]: warning: not owned by postfix: /opt/zimbra/data/postfix/./spool/pid/master.pid Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/postfix-script[9308]: starting the Postfix mail system Nov 2 17:57:28 indie postfix/master[9309]: fatal: bind 0.0.0.0 port 25: Address already in use Kill sendmail, postfix, exim, qmail, or whatever else you've got running. One thing to be clear on is that Zimbra changes a LOT on your box; that's why in production I've always run it within its own VM, so it can break anything it likes without affecting anything I care about. I have not done anything with Postfix at allU am sure it is the Fatal Bind message above, do I need to configure Postfix? I thought Zimbra did that on install? Yup. It does. But you need to kill any other MTA first. The Zimbra setup guide is very clear about this-- how did you get this far along without referencing it? -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory
Wahyu Darmawan wrote: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. Rgds, Integrate how? What's your desired end state? -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Squid authenticating by Active Directory
Wahyu Darmawan wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Corey Chandler li...@sequestered.net mailto:li...@sequestered.net wrote: Wahyu Darmawan wrote: Hi, Need some help for step by step to configure my squid integrate with Active Directory at my college. Could you please help me? Thank you. Rgds, Integrate how? What's your desired end state? Yes, I need some users allowed to use internet connection by Active Directory user database. Could you help me please? There are many good resources on this when you google for squid AD authentication. Try that first-- when you get stuck, then come back and ask specific questions. -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DNS log file question
James B. Byrne wrote: I am trying to sort out a configuration problem with y slave servers, more on that in a following message, but while I was examining the system log on one of those servers I saw this: Nov 3 12:30:43 inet04 named[18110]: client 174.88.12.107#60136: query (cache) 'www.soundunwound.com/A/IN' denied *snip* Now, none of these domains are served by my dns servers so what is going on? The question answers itself. You haven't enabled DNS forwarding of unmatched queries. Again, I remind potential respondents that I get the digest so please send me a direct copy of any reply to the list. Meh, that's work. -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] smartmontools
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I'm in the process of rolling out the upgrade from (mostly) 5.3 to 5.4. One of my servers started throwing the following: Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:0: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT (12.5 ns, offset 62) Nov 1 05:22:51 server kernel: target4:0:1: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT (12.5 ns, offset 62) into my logs every half hour. I don't see anything resembling an error message. The only thing I noted while googling was everyone else spoke of ...ns, offset 127, but I have no clue if that's relevant to anything. The smartd.conf is the default. I'm not running the debug kernel. Does anyone have any idea why it's doing this, and, if it's not important, how to get it to stop cluttering my logs? Hi, Mark. What do you see when you run a smartctl -a $DEVICE on the drive that's choking? -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Spacewalk or Puppet?
Karanbir Singh wrote: On 03/11/09 21:13, Ray Van Dolson wrote: Also, I believe cobbler functionality is being included in Spacewalk. spacewalk 0.6 is able to deploy machines with cobbler and do initial snippet management too. At that point I pass it over to puppet personally. Used to use cfengine, but there are aspects I prefer when it comes to puppet; your mileage may of course vary. -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Infrastructure HELP!
Curt Mills wrote: On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, ML wrote: My question is about initial setup. The 4 x 1TB drives. How to set this up for I have some protection? RAID 0+1? (striped + mirrored) I would end up with 2TB useable space. RAID 5? so what one is a hot spare? 3TB useable space? What about striping the 4 1TB and mirroring that to a 4 x 1tb External drive enclosure? Plan for drives going out but keeping the site operational. Also remember that RAID isn't a backup. RAID 5 is enticing because you get more usable space out of your drives, but you have to be sure you'll only lose one drive at a time and can get a replacement drive in there and sync'ed up before you lose a 2nd one... If the drives were made by the same manufacturer and were bought at about the same time you might easily lose 2 or more, blowing up your array. Right. The problem with 1TB drives (and really, any modern drive with decent capacity) is that you're vulnerable until that array finishes rebuilding-- a process that's taking longer and longer. I'd go with the RAID10 solution that someone previously posited. By the time you outgrow that, you should really plan for a SAN/NAS solution anyway... -- Corey / KB1JWQ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
