Re: [CentOS] Problem with mail server: stop flooding with fail2ban ?
Hello NIki, Juste enable postfix-sasl in jail.conf: [postfix-sasl] filter = postfix[mode=auth] port = smtp,465,submission,imap,imaps,pop3,pop3s logpath = %(postfix_log)s backend = %(postfix_backend)s enabled = true maxretry = 3 findtime = 172800 bantime = 3600 And enable recidive too: [recidive] logpath = /var/log/fail2ban.log banaction = %(banaction_allports)s bantime = 1mo findtime = 1w enabled = true Add ignoreip = 127.0.0.1 and your jumpoints :) Regards, DH po 29. 3. 2021 v 21:31 odesílatel Nicolas Kovacs napsal: > Hi, > > My main mail server is running CentOS 7 with Postfix and Dovecot. > > Last week I was surprised to see that Postfix had some troubles on this > machine, according to Icinga. I took a peek at the logs: > > # journalctl -p err > Mar 28 04:37:02 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[2786]: fatal: no SASL > authentication > mechanisms > Mar 28 04:37:02 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[2788]: fatal: no SASL > authentication > mechanisms > Mar 28 04:37:02 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[2790]: fatal: no SASL > authentication > mechanisms > Mar 28 04:37:02 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[2792]: fatal: no SASL > authentication > mechanisms > Mar 28 04:37:02 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[2794]: fatal: no SASL > authentication > mechanisms > ... > > And in /var/log/maillog I found a tsunami of these: > > Mar 28 03:18:33 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[29589]: warning: > unknown[45.227.253.115]: SASL LOGIN authentication failed: UGFzc3dvcmQ6 > Mar 28 03:18:33 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[29589]: lost connection after AUTH > from > unknown[45.227.253.115] > Mar 28 03:18:33 sd-151768 postfix/smtpd[29589]: disconnect from > unknown[45.227.253.115] > > My first reaction was to manually ban the IP addresses / networks which > caused > the flood, using my firewall: > > # firewall-cmd --permanent --add-rich-rule="rule family='ipv4' source > address='45.227.253.0/24' reject" > # firewall-cmd --reload > > I'm already using fail2ban in conjunction with firewalld to prevent brute > force > SSH attacks. > > Q: can I use it in a similar configuration to stop Postfix from getting > flooded > and brought down to its knees? > > Thanks & cheers from the sunny South of France, > > Niki > > -- > Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables > 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat > Site : https://www.microlinux.fr > Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr > Mail : i...@microlinux.fr > Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 > Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12 > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Missing announcement for the latest kernel
Hi, It seems that kernel-2.6.32-754.29.2 has not been announced on the maillist. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2103 Regards, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
Philippe, What's the output with '--allowerasing' switch? We are experiencing a similar issue, dnf update: ... Problem 53: problem with installed package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 - package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires perl-Encode(x86-64) = 4:2.97-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Encode-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 - package perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap-2013.0523-395.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.4), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap-2013.0523-395.el8.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.24.4-404.module_el8.1.0+229+cd132df8.x86_64 is excluded Problem 54: problem with installed package perl-IO-Compress-2.081-1.el8.noarch - package perl-IO-Compress-2.081-1.el8.noarch requires perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) >= 2.081, but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.081-1.el8.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 - package perl-Thread-Queue-3.13-1.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.4), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package perl-Thread-Queue-3.13-1.el8.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.24.4-404.module_el8.1.0+229+cd132df8.x86_64 is excluded Problem 55: problem with installed package perl-Git-2.18.1-3.el8.noarch - package perl-Git-2.18.2-1.el8_1.noarch requires git = 2.18.2-1.el8_1, but none of the providers can be installed - package git-2.18.2-1.el8_1.x86_64 requires perl(Term::ReadKey), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-TermReadKey-2.37-7.el8.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Git-2.18.1-3.el8.noarch requires git = 2.18.1-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Git-2.18.1-4.el8.noarch requires git = 2.18.1-4.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 - package git-2.18.1-3.el8.x86_64 requires git-core-doc = 2.18.1-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package git-2.18.1-4.el8.x86_64 requires git-core-doc = 2.18.1-4.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Time-Local-1:1.280-1.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.4), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both git-core-doc-2.18.2-1.el8_1.noarch and git-core-doc-2.18.1-3.el8.noarch - cannot install both git-core-doc-2.18.1-4.el8.noarch and git-core-doc-2.18.2-1.el8_1.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package perl-Time-Local-1:1.280-1.el8.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package git-core-doc-2.18.1-3.el8.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.24.4-404.module_el8.1.0+229+cd132df8.x86_64 is excluded Problem 56: problem with installed package logwatch-7.4.3-9.el8.noarch - package logwatch-7.4.3-9.el8.noarch requires perl(Sys::CPU), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-Sys-CPU-0.61-14.el8.i686 has inferior architecture - package perl-Sys-CPU-0.61-14.el8.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.24.4-398.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 - package perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.25-1000.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.4), but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.25-1000.module_el8.0.0+50+c3b345cd.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.24()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.25-396.el8.x86_64 - package perl-libs-4:5.24.4-404.module_el8.1.0+229+cd132df8.x86_64 is excluded Help dnf update --allowerasing, but all the perl packages will be removed. Regards, DH čt 16. 1. 2020 v 5:33 odesílatel Philippe Piot napsal: > Just as a followup even g++ is broken: > >
Re: [CentOS] Blocking attacks from a range of IP addresses
Hi, You can drop it before FW with blackhole route. DH čt 9. 1. 2020 v 7:21 odesílatel Thomas Stephen Lee napsal: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:07 AM H wrote: > > > I am being attacked by an entire subnet where the first two parts of the > > IP address remain identical but the last two parts vary sufficiently that > > it is not caught by fail2ban since the attempts do not meet the cut-off > of > > a certain number of attempts within the given time. > > > > Has anyone created a fail2ban filter for this type of attack? As of right > > now, I have manually banned a range of IP addresses but would like to > > automate it for the future. > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > Hi, > > I am not an expert but, > you can try creating an ipset with the the range you need and do a drop in > iptables or firewalld. > We have used ipsets with bare iptables in CentOS 6, and firewalld in CentOS > 7. > fail2ban also uses ipsets in CentOS 7. > > thanks > -- > Lee > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 8 Release Notes - Czech translation
Jan, I'm not able to modify ACLs on the page... It must be done by admin. DH pá 4. 10. 2019 v 9:09 odesílatel Jan Papež (honyczek) < honyczek-mail...@email.cz> napsal: > Hello, > > I see the page, but there is no button to edit it. If I try to add > ?action=edit to URL, wiki shows message "Nemáte dovoleno editovat tuto > stránku." (You are not allowed to edit this page). > > Jan > > čt 3. 10. 2019 v 21:08 odesílatel David Hrbáč > napsal: > > > > Jan, > > > > I have created the page. Are you able to edit it? > > > > Regards. > > DH > > > > čt 3. 10. 2019 v 19:20 odesílatel Jan Papež (honyczek) < > honyczek-mail...@email.cz> napsal: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm Jan Papež and I'd like to contribute to CentOS Wiki as translator. > I'm planning to translate Release Notes of CentOS 8, but now I have no > rights to create new page: > https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS8.1905/Czech My > username is JanPapez. Please, could you give me an access to make it? > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Jan Papež > >> ___ > >> CentOS-docs mailing list > >> CentOS-docs@centos.org > >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > > > > ___ > > CentOS-docs mailing list > > CentOS-docs@centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > > > > -- > Jan Papež (honyczek) > ___ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS 8 Release Notes - Czech translation
Jan, I have created the page. Are you able to edit it? Regards. DH čt 3. 10. 2019 v 19:20 odesílatel Jan Papež (honyczek) < honyczek-mail...@email.cz> napsal: > Hello, > > I'm Jan Papež and I'd like to contribute to CentOS Wiki as translator. I'm > planning to translate Release Notes of CentOS 8, but now I have no rights > to create new page: > https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS8.1905/Czech My > username is JanPapez. Please, could you give me an access to make it? > > Thank you. > > Jan Papež > ___ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] Missing announcements for 20190815 updates
Thanks! DH so 17. 8. 2019 v 0:17 odesílatel Johnny Hughes napsal: > On 8/16/19 7:02 AM, David Hrbáč wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I see no posts for updates during August in CentOS-announce. > > > > Sorry, they were stuck in the queue. Released now. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Missing announcements for 20190815 updates
Hello, I see no posts for updates during August in CentOS-announce. Thanks, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT: RepoForge/RPMForge State Survey
Hello, RepoForge used to be one of the important repositories for CentOS/RHEL. I know that RepoForge is considered to be clinically dead nowadays. On the other hand RepoForge is still physically alive. We would like to harness community opinion on RepoForge status and future. In case that you use or used to use the RepoForge I kindly ask you to fill up this form to help us with the decision. The form is here: https://goo.gl/forms/4SLFnD16K4yJeitt2 Thanks a lot, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1652 Important CentOS 6 openssl Security Update
Hi,
This announcement has different body scheme than the rest of
announcement messages. Is it a new scheme? It breaks the importing
scripts...
Thanks,
DH
Dne 16.10.2014 v 22:48 Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1652
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
-
i386
-
5898ac3179dfdd904c352badd79b6f5ec702315f4bc7b8989de8f114304fbd78
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
dcc5d47340d69f53af592a92282df89ef3bd4705ce34f4a57a93d211e93cfd7d
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
dc42eb136b3cfef78d590d4ab29d36e5e5951bc9433d20d5ca633033d960a00d
openssl-perl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
95e67f00f7d58348e5f0df6ac74d7baecb9d5fc214d58ad257a14bec353219a3
openssl-static-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
-
X86_64
-
5898ac3179dfdd904c352badd79b6f5ec702315f4bc7b8989de8f114304fbd78
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
17bfdb52afcb2ebaa16875819b9d8d2f3dc84eb061ee3e194da14e286bc76029
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
dcc5d47340d69f53af592a92282df89ef3bd4705ce34f4a57a93d211e93cfd7d
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
7c390aab888c07887fc783686f42216711665738e58c2b23029748292dd0f96d
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
dfdcf88163743d5f4fda06a69cba00b822b73ba66aa5841faf8c0e9841b91bcb
openssl-perl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
0f8cc0615d96d4d7e74b5ffc109143873510406dbb6be679d4ab94bd4f731cdb
openssl-static-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
-
Source:
-
1a1c3ed0d8eb5775d89b726e7f19ff2d8b52b7ef27f6e36260e83ffc40328460
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_5.2.src.rpm
=
The following upstream security issues are addressed in this update:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1652.html
=
NOTE: This update is released into the CentOS-6.5 tree and has a .el6_5 dist
tag, *NOT* the .el6_6 dist tag that Red Hat used for RHEL in the link above.
This update was built against 'CentOS-6.5 + updates' and that is where it is
intended to be used.
The CentOS team will build and release a openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.2.src.rpm as
a zero day update to CentOS-6.6 when that is released as we are currently
building CentOS-6.6 from the released Red Hat Enterprise Linux sources.
Please also note that even after installing this update, further action is
required to mitigate the POODLE issue on CentOS-6. Please see this link for
steps to take and ways to test for both the POODLE and TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV
issues.
http://wiki.centos.org/Security/POODLE
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1652 Important CentOS 6 openssl Security Update
Dne 20.10.2014 v 12:55 Johnny Hughes napsal(a): Well, this one is a 'one off' as it really has no upstream counterpart. It also has notes that the other announcements do not, etc. As a 'one off', the format was taken from the Xen4CentOS type announcements. The normal distro announcements will continue as they were before. Thanks, Johnny Hughes Thanks, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed workaround
Dne 9.4.2014 17:27, Johnny Hughes napsal(a): It is only things that actually used SSL in memory (like httpd, imaps, pop3s, etc) . those certificates COULD have been impacted. openssh was not impacted (based on my reading). What about the user credentials sent over this insecure communication channel. They could be also compromised... DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed workaround
Dne 10.4.2014 14:47, Johnny Hughes napsal(a): Those are the two possible things that could have happened. = In the case of CentOS servers, the time period where that could have occurred is from December 1, 2013 (when openssl-1.0.1e-15.el6 was released in CentOS-6.5) until people using 6.5 upgrade to openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7 (available on April 8th, 2014). In the case of some other distributions, the possible time frame is from March 2012 until April 2014. Yes, that's I wanted to point out. And that's why we are going to replace all the SSL certificates. But this is not enough, we have to and are going to regenerate the user passwords and ssh keys. What more we are also going to regenerate server ssh keys, they could be compromised because of GSISSHD. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CLAMAV problem: Error message outdated version although yum list installed reports correct version
Dne 20.2.2014 05:09, Always Learning napsal(a): On C6 my source is EPEL from mirrors.n-ix.net clamav.x86_64 0.98.1-1.el6 @epel clamav-db.x86_64 0.98.1-1.el6 @epel On C5 its Dag/rpmforge from ftp.nluug.nl clamav.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed clamav-db.x86_640.98-2.el5.rf installed clamav-devel.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed clamav-milter.x86_640.98-2.el5.rf installed My C5 logwatch error message is WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.98 Recommended version: 0.98.1 0.98-2 suggests revision 2 of 0.98, which is therefore older than 0.98.1 Dag, can you assist ?? Thanks / Dank je wel Hi, We do have some troubles with our updates (RepoForge). That's why I have created repoforge updates repo, see http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2013-September/029387.html Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
Dne 7.1.2014 22:09, Karanbir Singh napsal(a): With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the Red Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging technologies. Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we maintain the established base. Something I have dreamt of. Good news. Congratulations. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Raspberry Pi
Dne 18.8.2013 12:16, Rajagopal Swaminathan napsal(a): Greetings, Does anybody know of centos spin of above-captioned platform? It is supposed to be an ARM platform. You want the RedSleeve. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround
Dne 12.3.2013 19:03, Fabien Archambault napsal(a): I too have the same problem but couldn't figure where is the issue. It stops working even if the service says all is right. I have to restart the service to let it work again... I will try to find through your idea. Thanks, Fabien As temporary solution you can always use fail2ban from Repoforge. It's a little bit older, but works on 6.x. Regards, David Hrbac ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] running yum update on remote servers
Dne 25.2.2013 14:48, Robert Moskowitz napsal(a): I have read a couple old threads here on updates for servers, and I am looking for some mechanics to getting the actual updates done. I don't want automatic updates; I want to control when and what gets updated. First I have to determine that a particular server needs updates. I suppose a daily script that would run yum check-updates' and emails me the results could work, but then I would only want the email IF there was something to update, at my limited use of this option does not show anything to trigger a notify on changes. Does anyone know of a script that would do this? Then there is the actual update. I learned long ago NOT to run yum over an SSH connection, as WHEN that connection breaks in the middle of an update, you can have quite a problem to clean up. All I have done todate is to start vncserver and connect via vnc to then run yum. I can even drop the vnc connection and come back later to check results. I have considered running yum disconnected (? when you end a command with ) and log the results to a file that you check later. What are practical approaches to this? I only have a few servers here to manage. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, We update all the boxes over ssh. Works fine. Those who are afraid of disconnections may always run it within tmux/screen session. As to managing the whole infra, the best tool for that is Spacewalk, but it might be too big for you. So, you can have nagios to check yum status on all the boxes. There is also a tool called apt-dater, see http://www.ibh.de/apt-dater/ Regardless the APT in the name it handles yum well. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange du/df behaviour.
Dne 28.6.2012 10:26, Rafał Radecki napsal(a): Update: Any clues why df shows wrong and floating info? Reserved space for root? See man dumpe2fs and tune2fs. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
Dne 26.6.2012 15:40, Rafał Radecki napsal(a): Hi all. I am working for a hosting provider in Poland. We are currently searching for an universal, extensible hardware platform which we would like to use in our server infrastructure. The platform should have: - possibility to install up to 32GB of RAM and at least 4 slots for it; - at least 6 SATA ports; - the possibility to use SAS disks; - at least one 1Gb/s network interface and the possibility to add another one; - size of 2 or 3U; - hot swap for disks. We are looking for a solution in which we would be able to deploy a basic server with for example 2 SATA disks, 8GB of RAM, 1 NIC, 4 cors and to be able to use the same enclosure and motherboard and extend it to deploy a more heavy-duty server with for example 6 SATA disks, 24GB of RAM, 2 NICs, 8 cors. Which manufacturer can you recommend and why? We are looking for something rather not expensive but reliable which has a good support. All servers will be based on CentOS5/6 :) Cisco UCS? :o) Kidding, too pricey for these requirements. Your requirements are quite low and almost every desktop motherboard is ok nowadays. If your infra is built with failure in mind, you can go Google way. No special HW, just HA sw solution. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need to get latest version of freetds for centos 6.2
Dne 9.6.2012 02:44, Kaplan, Andrew H. napsal(a): How and where can I get the correct perl-DBD-Sybase package that references the latter version of the freetds package? Andrew, I have pushed upgraded spec files for freetsd and perl-DBI-Sybase to Repoforge repository: see https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/9f0f6ab249f79e12395fe1ad29952e3f18a3d788 and https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/a5b9940656c61dd6b6ddf316e620603863f794c9 Now it's up to Dag, he's the only one to build the packages for Repoforge. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using UTF8 under mysql in Centos6
Dne 4.6.2012 11:44, C. L. Martinez napsal(a): Hi all, I am trying to configure utf8 in mysql under centos6 to display special characters, like accents. I use this mysql instance to store plain syslog logs. I have configured this under my.cnf: [mysqld] init_connect = 'SET collation_connection = utf8_general_ci' init_connect = 'SET NAMES utf8' character-set-server = utf8 collation-server = utf8_general_ci [client] default-character-set = utf8 but it doesn't seems to work ... Any idea?? Thanks. Hi, On C6 we use these directives: init_connect='SET NAMES utf8' character_set_server = utf8 collation_server = utf8_general_ci David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using UTF8 under mysql in Centos6
Dne 4.6.2012 12:22, C. L. Martinez napsal(a): Uhmm .. and nothing more?? The only difference with my config is the underscore ... Yes, that's all, works pretty well. It's a little bit different than on C5, here we use only: default-character-set=utf8 init_connect='SET NAMES utf8' David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using UTF8 under mysql in Centos6
Dne 4.6.2012 13:04, C. L. Martinez napsal(a): Ok, I will try it ... many thanks. Don't forget to recreate all the databases... DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.8 to 4.9
Dne 29.5.2012 10:38, Giles Coochey napsal(a): Can he not use http://vault.centos.org/4.9/updates/ as a repository for updates? Yes, he can, see http://www.hrbac.cz/2012/04/sed-oneliner-to-change-centos-4-repos-to-vault-centos-org/ DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences (was: Re: Repositories in CentOS 5.8)
Dne 26.5.2012 18:33, Lamar Owen napsal(a):
The amavisd-new-milter package does exist for CentOS 5.8; I cannot, however,
find an amavisd-new-milter package for CentOS 6 in either rpmforge or
rpmforge-extras.
Right,
there's no el6 build because of spec file:
10 %{?el6:%define _without_milter 1}
11 %{?el5:%define _without_milter 0}
12 %{?el4:%define _without_milter 0}
I'm not sure why we have decided not to build el6.
Which is just as well, since this amavisd-new-milter is different from
amavisd-milter, which is currently at version 1.5.0, the version that is
compatible with amavisd-new 2.7.0 and up. It's somewhat unfortunate to have
two very different things packaged with very similar names; the amavis-milter
that comes with amavisd-new is much less useful than the separate
amavisd-milter ( http://amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net/ ; the one packaged
with amavisd-new is the one with a README at
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.milter.txt that points to the Petr
Rehor rewrite at amavisd-milter.sourceforge.net).
I did not know about this. Are you willing to share your amavis-milter
spec file so we can include it in Repoforge?
Regards,
DH
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Third party repo differences (was: Re: Repositories in CentOS 5.8)
Dne 25.5.2012 02:00, Lamar Owen napsal(a): At the moment both EPEL and RPMforge are on a 2.6.x amavisd-new; 2.7 makes some changes in the AM.PDP protocol that can break, for instance, amavisd-milter (distinct from the much less useful amavis-milter). Neither repo has amavisd-milter, so that compatibility issue may not show up except to those who actually use amavisd-milter instead of the much less useful amavis-milter. Lamar, Repoforge/RPMforge does provide amavisd-new-milter package... DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 4 repos help me!
Dne 21.4.2012 10:27, Tony Mountifield napsal(a): Except don't change the gpgkey lines, as the keys are still in the original place and haven't moved to vault. (I discovered this just yesterday after finding and applying your excellent sed one-liner). Cheers Tony Tony, I can see the keys on vault. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 4 repos help me!
Dne 20.4.2012 21:57, Gustavo Lacoste napsal(a): Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support to Centos 4 platform today, but I need to install some packages -ideally- from repositories, so I'll be glad if someone can provide me still working ones, (obviously non-official). Hi Gustavo, Better do upgrade. If you can't see http://www.hrbac.cz/2012/04/sed-oneliner-to-change-centos-4-repos-to-vault-centos-org/ DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???
Dne 7.4.2012 21:31, ken napsal(a): yum update output: ... -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric --- Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed) ... # rpm -qa| grep goffice goffice-0.2.2-1.el5 # yum deplist gnumeric|grep goffice dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 provider: goffice.i386 0.2.2-1.el5 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, Please create an issue on GitHub: https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/issues Thanks, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Filing a bug for clamav
Dne 18.2.2012 01:40, Jobst Schmalenbach napsal(a): OK, thanks ... I am a step further then. Now if I do a yum list installed | grep clamav then this happens: [root ~] #yum list installed | grep clam clamav.x86_64 0.97.3-3.el5 installed clamav-db.x86_64 0.97.3-3.el5 installed clamav-milter.x86_64 0.97.3-3.el5 installed clamd.x86_64 0.97.3-3.el5 installed Jobst, Send us what 'rpm -qi clamav' returns. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on production servers?
Dne 18.1.2012 11:57, Karanbir Singh napsal(a): I'm looking for a site / person to help testing a mirror proxy setup, interested ? What are the requirements? Storage, fast connection? DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on production servers?
Dne 18.1.2012 11:54, Sorin Srbu napsal(a): We've expanded our local calculation farm to now include mid-teen numbers, and manual updates is becoming a PITA... I think you want Spacewalk... DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on production servers?
Dne 18.1.2012 12:15, Karanbir Singh napsal(a): ideally a large number of machines, and a reasonable local connection with the ability to schedule and manage updates being applied on the machines ( so, rules out hosting setups ) I've got everything in Spacewalk. So someone else must step in. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS and LessFS
Dne 17.1.2012 0:50, Hugh E Cruickshank napsal(a): Hi All: We have been looking at implementing deduplication on a backup server. From what I have been able to find the available documentation is pretty thin. I ended up trying to install LessFS on this CentOS 5.7 box but we have now encountered problems with fuse version. Has anyone out there been able to get LessFS running on CentOS 5.7 and can provide some pointers? If not LessFS can you suggest an alternate deduplication software? TIA Regards, Hugh Hi Hugh, I've got something in my repo http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/fuse-lessfs.html. Might be somewhat outdated. You can try it and we can build new versions. As to alternatives I'm happy with rdiff-backup. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sa-update error with perl
Dne 11.1.2012 1:13, email builder napsal(a): Well, kind of. If you review this thread, you'll see that the the fix was to stop using the RepoForge package for perl-NetAddr-IP so that it wasn't mixed with CentOS packages for perl-Net-DNS and perl-IO-Socket-INET6. Maybe your position is that you won't fix perl-NetAddr-IP because you only support it when used when all other packages are from RepoForge, but I don't think that's realistic at all - everyone running CentOS will have mostly CentOS packages - naturally. They'll pick up some others they want or need for various reasons from RepoForge, so I'd imagine you'll see mixing of packages quite often amongst people who add RepoForge to their yum systems. Therefore, I'd have thought you'd be interested to learn of an incompatibility in one of the RepoForge packages. Well, I will definitely not fix it. Most of users does not pick up the particular packages but enables the repo entity. Basically it would be really hard to support both scenarios. I consider packages you mention as a whole email stack provided by RF. The stack includes: amavisd-new spamassassin dependent perl-\* dependent file de-compressors Regards, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sa-update error with perl
Dne 11.1.2012 17:22, Johnny Hughes napsal(a): OK ... then it ought to move (probably) :) Se my post on repoforge users list. http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2012-January/022634.html There's no one to move the package but Dag. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sa-update error with perl
Dne 11.1.2012 17:12, email builder napsal(a): I'm on a 32 bit machine, not sure if that makes a difference. What I do know is this: yum update == Package Arch Version Repository Size == Updating: perl-NetAddr-IP i386 4.044-1.el5.rf rpmforge 140 k Transaction Summary == Install 0 Package(s) Upgrade 1 Package(s) Is this because I need to migrate something from rpmforge to RepoForge??? No, this is the timeline: - no perl-NetAddr-IP in Centos 5.7 - RF's perl-NetAddr-IP replaces no package in OS, so it must be in RF repo - perl-NetAddr-IP-4.027 has been introduced in Centos 5.7 - no one (Dag) moved perl-NetAddr-IP from RF to RFX - stock perl-NetAddr-IP-4.027perl-NetAddr-IP-4.044 from RF - and here goes the yum... DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sa-update error with perl
Dne 10.1.2012 4:02, email builder napsal(a): Why? Just remove that package and install the one from CentOS. Spamassassin doesn't need to be touched. Hello, Seems to me that you are still using the mix of repos. Packages from RF work fine. root@specs2:1280:279:/$ rpm -q spamassassin perl-IO-Socket-INET6 perl-Net-DNS perl-NetAddr-IP| sort perl-IO-Socket-INET6-2.57-2.el5.rfx perl-NetAddr-IP-4.044-1.el5.rf perl-Net-DNS-0.66-1.el5.rfx spamassassin-3.3.2-2.el5.rfx root@specs2:1279:278:/$ sa-update -D Jan 10 15:07:53.098 [32233] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all Jan 10 15:07:53.098 [32233] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG Jan 10 15:07:53.098 [32233] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 Jan 10 15:07:53.098 [32233] dbg: generic: Perl 5.008008, PREFIX=/usr, DEF_RULES_DIR=/usr/share/spamassassin, LOCAL_RULES_DIR=/etc/mail/spamassassin, LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/lib/spamassassin Jan 10 15:07:53.098 [32233] dbg: config: timing enabled Jan 10 15:07:53.099 [32233] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen. Jan 10 15:07:53.104 [32233] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes Jan 10 15:07:53.104 [32233] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.66 Jan 10 15:07:53.104 [32233] dbg: generic: sa-update version svn917659 Jan 10 15:07:53.104 [32233] dbg: generic: using update directory: /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008008 linux Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.13 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: HTML::Parser, version 3.68 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.66 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: NetAddr::IP, version 4.044 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Time::HiRes, version 1.9717 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Archive::Tar, version 1.56 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: IO::Zlib, version 1.10 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.13 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: MIME::Base64, version 3.07 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: DB_File, version 1.814 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Net::SMTP, version 2.29 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Mail::SPF, version v2.006 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.84 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Net::Ident, version 1.23 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: IO::Socket::INET6, version 2.57 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: IO::Socket::SSL, version 1.44 Jan 10 15:07:53.231 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Compress::Zlib, version 2.037 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Mail::DKIM, version 0.39 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: DBI, version 1.616 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Getopt::Long, version 2.35 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: LWP::UserAgent, version 5.835 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: HTTP::Date, version 5.831 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: diag: [...] module installed: Encode::Detect, version 1.01 Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: gpg: Searching for 'gpg' Jan 10 15:07:53.232 [32233] dbg: util: current PATH is: /usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin Jan 10 15:07:53.233 [32233] dbg: util: executable for gpg was found at /usr/bin/gpg Jan 10 15:07:53.233 [32233] dbg: gpg: found /usr/bin/gpg Jan 10 15:07:53.233 [32233] dbg: gpg: release trusted key id list: 5E541DC959CB8BAC7C78DFDC4056A61A5244EC45 26C900A46DD40CD5AD24F6D7DEE01987265FA05B 0C2B1D7175B852C64B3CDC716C55397824F434CE Jan 10 15:07:53.235 [32233] dbg: channel: attempting channel updates.spamassassin.org Jan 10 15:07:53.235 [32233] dbg: channel: update directory /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org Jan 10 15:07:53.235 [32233] dbg: channel: channel cf file /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org.cf Jan 10 15:07:53.236 [32233] dbg: channel: channel pre file /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org.pre Jan 10 15:07:53.236 [32233] dbg: channel: metadata version = 1227079 Jan 10 15:07:53.240 [32233] dbg: dns: 2.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 1227079, parsed as 1227079 Jan 10 15:07:53.240 [32233] dbg: channel: current version is 1227079, new version is 1227079, skipping channel Jan 10 15:07:53.240 [32233] dbg: diag: updates complete, exiting with code 1 Regards, DH ___ CentOS mailing list
Re: [CentOS-docs] 6.1 Release Notes translations
Dne 11.12.2011 21:44, José G. Arribas napsal(a): I'm in the same situation with the same doubt. This is the link http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13524967/Centos_6_2_NotasDeLaVersion.odt to the odf file with the spanish translation of the Release Notes of CentOS 6.1. Thanks. José G. Arribas José, Create account on wiki and ask Ralf to add permissions. DH ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] 6.1 Release Notes translations
Dne 12.12.2011 8:24, Felipe Solís napsal(a): Hello, I would like to help by submitting spanish translations, starting with the 6.1 release notes. What requirements should I meet in order to get write access? Regards, Felipe Solís Felipe, Create account on wiki http://wiki.centos.org/UserPreferences and ask Ralf for permissions. BTW José G. Arribas have created Esp RN, see http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13524967/Centos_6_2_NotasDeLaVersion.odt. Regards, DH ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] 6.1 Release Notes translations
Dne 6.12.2011 22:26, Joshua Thijssen napsal(a): I've updated the RN for 6.0 with the latest texts, plus I've used the include sections. The dutch word for dutch is Nederlands so it should be: * [:Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/Dutch:Nederlands (ne)] - Joshua Thijssen Since this is located inside an include section I'm not sure if I should change that. If everything is ok, I'll take a look at the CentOS 6.1 RN gr, josh Josh, I have added it to RN. Seems OK now. DH ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] high availability ideas
Dne 19.11.2011 03:35, Digimer napsal(a): WAN/Stretch clustering suffers most for network latency. If you need to keep the data in sync across both nodes, using DRBD will limit your hard drives, effectively, to the speed and latency of the link between your nodes at the different DCs. This is rarely usable. Stop by #linux-cluster and/or #drbd, I know there are folks there from Linbit and Hestaxo who could help you, but you're going to be facing rather expensive technical challenges. :) DRDB over WAN is nonsense. There are many scenarios expensive/non-expensive, depends on data you want to distribute. Being you I would start with the simplest one. I can name a few: - buy netapp and create metrocluster with RRDNS - have your subnet routed into both datacenters and use virtual IPs - webapp might be somewhat static, so files might be easy to sync, as to DB data, start with master-slave replica and M/S swap, try to read data from multiple source, write to only the one - you are talking about two nodes, with your scenario only one will serve the data in time, it's not horizontal scaling, try to use both in time - have low ttl for DNS with RRDNS, add/remove records by nodes' status - don't forget about webapp side of topic, webapp must be prepared to save nonDB content - start with two nodes in one dataceter to test your horizontal scenario, you can than split it into two DC or easily add the third/fourth nodes in another DC - DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] high availability ideas
Dne 19.11.2011 12:11, n...@li.nux.ro napsal(a): Thank you, however I decided to go for a less exotic setup and use a more passive way of sync (probably rsync and mysql replication) and I'll do the high availability part from DNS (yes, I know there are issues with this solution as well). Thanks again. Think about session store too. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.1 QA status update.
Dne 9.11.2011 23:05, Lamar Owen napsal(a): Posted, in case you haven't seen it already: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/116 Good news. Quite good piece of news. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
Dne 2.11.2011 18:43, Bill Campbell napsal(a): We were using that about 5 years ago, and paid Novell a fair amount of money in their Partner program. Novell's support was slim to non-existent leading to our move to CentOS. Given the recent sale to Attachmate and such, I wouldn't invest any time or money in SLES. Bill Our many years experience with SLES is the very same. It is enterprise and certified distro, but I would not invest the cent into it. One of the reasons we are using CentOS. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos
Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a): Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some (or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat community. Well, there are no other RHEL clones except SL/Centos. We have quite large infrastructure and we want it homogeneous as possible. Because we run a few boxes with IBM, Ora stuff we need certified OSes, certified is only RHEL or SuSE. So we are using RHEL and Centos. We have been running happily and smoothly for a few years with this concept. Because of the lastest issues with CentOS we are really considering moving back to Debian. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request
Dne 15.9.2011 9:22, Mathieu Baudier napsal(a): Sounds good! Thanks for the update. No it does not. Since cr repo breaks Spacewalk management. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request
Dne 15.9.2011 10:36, John Hodrien napsal(a): Breaks it how? jh So, cr should be used only during shift phase. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dovecot sieve rpm?
Dne 13.5.2011 6:58, David Mehler napsal(a): Hello, Thank you everyone for your replies. I would definitely like to stick with postfix as it's what i'm most comfortable with. The problem is dovecot. I believe it's extras there's the 1.0.7 dovecot, I'd like to be running the 2.0.x dovecot prefered or the 1.2.x version if not, the problem is the only place I can find to get them at in rpm form they are broken, both those versions. I am not an rpm compilation guru I can compile an src.rpm in to a binary package, which is how I upgraded postfix, but making one from scratch is over my head. Unless anyone has a 2.0.x or 1.2.x version of dovecot i'm going to have to switch pop/imap servers for this configuration. I don't want to run a xinetd service, so that's out and i'd prefer having my pop/imap server in a single package. The two packages I can think of as alternatives to dovecot are courier-imap and cyrus-imap. I'd appreciate experiences pro conn with each. And if anyone has that dovecot or can help me make one offlist i'd appreciate that as well. Thanks. Dave. David, I'm sure atrpms 2.x version of Dovecot is ok and I'm also sure that 1.2.x within my repo and within atrpms are ok too. I do prefer Dovecot, but when it comes to alternatives, I can also recommend Cyrus. One of the instances I manage has 30 thousands of mailboxes running on a single box smoothly and easily. Regards, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ipv6 to ipv4 tunnel private replies requested
Dne 11.5.2011 2:15, David Mehler napsal(a): Hello, I am afraid a comment in my last message was misinterpreted. I previously had this configuration, linux and ipv6 tunnel through a tunnel broker. It was on a Ubuntu 9.10 box that a friend of mine set up. That box has been retired and replaced with CentOS 5.6. I am now trying to get the tunnel broker working with the centos box, and having many frustrations with it. I do have the ubuntu network files from backup, but I to date have not been able to make them work, settings wise, with the way centos does networking, I would almost say forget the backup files just take the numbers out of them. I appreciate any help. Again, private replies please. Thanks. Dave. David, I'm not running SixXS tunnel on CentOS right now. I'm planning to have some. Right now I have one tunnel on OpenWRT and I'm using this script. Regards, DH ip tunnel add sixbone mode sit remote ipv.addreess.of.sixxsendpoit ip link set sixbone up ip addr add ipv6:address:of:tunnel::2/64 dev sixbone ip route add default via ipv6:address:of:tunnel::1 ip link set mtu 1280 dev sixbone ip tunnel change sixbone ttl 64 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iptables to block region-specific ip's?
Dne 11.5.2011 18:58, David Mehler napsal(a): With regards blocking ip's and fail2ban, which method is better in terms of system resources, blocking via iptables as in the case of sshd or blocking via hosts.deny as in the case of postfix? http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/HOWTO_use_geoiplookup DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dovecot sieve rpm?
Dne 9.5.2011 6:32, David Mehler napsal(a): Hello, Does anyone have a repo or have a dovecot 1.2 and dovecot sieve rpm, also a postfix 2.5 or 2.6 rpm? I saw some on a repo called atrpms, but it has dependency issues, and I read that that repo is dangerous. Thanks. Dave. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos David, You can use atrpms and exclude all packages but dovecot. As to Dovecot upgrade on C4.x, here is may testing repo containing the successful path to upgrade Dovecot: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/dovecot-sieve.html As far as I can remember, we went to 1.1.x first and than - 1.2.x and everything was OK. Regards, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dovecot sieve rpm?
Dne 9.5.2011 9:52, David Mehler napsal(a):
Hello,
Thank you for your reply. I'm using a centos 5 will that make a
difference? Also, is there a way I can set my yum up to access your
repo from the server? I'm also interested in your php packages.
Thanks.
Dave.
Hello,
Look for hrb-release rpm. There are some other repositories:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el{4,5}/hrb{tls, kernel, bacula,
etc}/{stable,testing}/{i386,x86_64}/
Each repository has its own hrb-*-release package.
DH
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] Database Installtion of Spacewalk ?
Dne 7.5.2011 18:50, GaoHu napsal(a): * oracle-instantclient11.2-11.2.0.2.0.ARCH.rpm after compared this with content of spacewalk wiki, I think this should be oracle-instantclient11.2-basic-11.2.0.2.0.ARCH.rpm oracle-instantclient11.2-sqlplus-11.2.0.2.0.ARCH.rpm Hi, Thanks for reporting, you are right. That's my fault. I'm going to update it on Monday, I don't have the password right here. Thanks, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Some questions: Release Notes CentOS 5.6
Dne 14.4.2011 11:31, Timothy Lee napsal(a): No objections. But please add a link for the English translation (yes, even inside the English page), so that a person on the translated page can access the English version if necessary. Regards, Timothy Lee I have just updated the translation list. It's sorted by ISO country code, contains only localised language names. I wish we could do the same with the ISOs sums. DH ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Some questions: Release Notes CentOS 5.6
Dne 14.4.2011 11:28, Manuel Wolfshant napsal(a): then let's do it. any objections on the approach suggested by David ? Agree with Tim, English must be also included. The list also must be resorted by language. DH ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] Corporate support for CentOS
Dne 27.3.2011 17:33, Johnny Hughes napsal(a): What the CentOS project would be interested in (from a corporate provider) would be to hire people and allow them to do CentOS related things. We are not interested in being paid in addition to our current work, but making taking care of CentOS our only work. Well, Financial donations to project are suppressed by CentOS for a few years now. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6
Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a): From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS RHEL4:2005-02-14 CentOS-4: 2005-03-0923 days RHEL5:2007-03-14 CentOS-5: 2007-04-1229 days RHEL6:2010-11-10 CentOS-6: TBD 112+ days Priority is CentOS 5.6, which is what people are actually using. It is very likely a RHEL 6.1 Beta is out before CentOS-6.0. Early RHEL 6.1 Beta access has been offered by Red Hat to RHCE's already. RHEL5.6:2011-01-12 Centos-5.6:TBD50+ days DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] do i need a dedicated ip address for https?
Dne 23.12.2010 1:08, Les Mikesell napsal(a): The issue is that the server needs to know the hostname given to the browser to find the matching certificate, and the only way to do that and stay on the standard port 443 with the apache version on centos is to bind each virtual host to a different IP address. Per the apache ssl faq at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts2, 2.2.12 or later supports SNI where the browser passes the hostname before the ssl session starts. Guys, Of course that it's possible to host multi-site on ONE ip. As Les has said, it's about SNI enabled web clients and servers. Not all clients support SNI. As to Apache, there's no need to go with 2.2.12. SNI is very easy to support with both Centos 4 and Centos 5. There's module mod_gnutls packed for Centos in one of my repo. Used in production for a few years now. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/i386/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/x86_64/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-tls/stable/i386/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-tls/stable/x86_64/repoview/ Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any news on an updated php 5.2 version in extras/testing?
Dne 1.12.2010 13:17, Karanbir Singh napsal(a): If you file an issue request at bugs.centos.org; i'll investigate - KB I'd say the bigger issue is 5.1.6 C4Plus php, which is not maintained together with C4Plus pecl/pear modules. C4Plus php is installed on many boxes over the world. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SMS Gateway
Dne 18.11.2010 12:58, Jakub Jedelsky napsal(a): Thanks, I'm testing smstools3 now and it seems as what we need. In free time I will test Kannel too. Thanks for hints. We use gammu. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
Dne 17.9.2010 22:16, Tom Bishop napsal(a): Benn playing with the beta's and have looked around for a potential release date...Does anyone know what the likely date is??? Thanks http://translate.google.cz/translate?js=nprev=_thl=csie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1sl=cstl=enu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.root.cz%2Fclanky%2Flinuxalt-2010-datove-schranky-v-linuxu%2Fact=url see Radek Vokál told the date of issue of RHEL 6 which is scheduled for 10 November this year. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] heads up - on latest rpmforge perl-NetAddr-IP update and spamassassin 3.3.1 conflict on Centos4
Dne 28.10.2010 20:32, Ned Slider napsal(a): It's a known issue with perl-NetAddr-IP-4.034 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=62521 As you've discovered, downgrading is the temporary fix. I have just committed update to perl-NetAddr-IP-4.035. Regards, DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SOLVED (Re: Openwebmail emergency (Perl))
Dne 14.10.2010 8:17, Jussi Hirvi napsal(a): locate Zlib.pm C5 x86_64 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Compress/Zlib.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/IO/Zlib.pm /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Compress/Raw/Zlib.pm locate Zlib.pm | xargs rpm -qf perl-IO-Compress-2.030-2.el5.rf perl-IO-Zlib-1.10-1.el5.rf perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.030-1.el5.rf C4 i386 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/Compress/Raw/Zlib.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/IO/Zlib.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Compress/Zlib.pm locate Zlib.pm | xargs rpm -qf perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.024-1.el4.rf perl-IO-Zlib-1.10-1.el4.rf perl-IO-Compress-2.024-1.el4.rf DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Openwebmail emergency (Perl)
Dne 12.10.2010 8:28, Jussi Hirvi napsal(a): After system update yesterday, Openwebmail now gives an error: Undefined subroutine Compress::Zlib::memGzip called at /var/www/cgi-bin/openwebmail/shares/ow-shared.pl line 1175. I tried to do perl -MCPAN -e shell install Compress::Zlib But it says Compress::Zlib is up-to-date. What do to?? I cannot find an answer by googling. - Jussi Hi, what's the uname -a and rpm -q perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib perl-IO-Compress perl-IO-Compress-Zlib perl. I have just created testing pl script with Compress::Zlib::memGzip running smoothly. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Openwebmail emergency (Perl)
Dne 12.10.2010 9:03, Jussi Hirvi napsal(a): On 12.10.2010 9.52, Sean Hart wrote: Not sure if this will help... Have you tried updating perl-IO-Compress? It is up-to-date. The whole problem started when I did yum update yesterday. - Jussi Try removing perl-IO-Compress-Zlib and install only perl-IO-Compress and perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Openwebmail emergency (Perl)
Dne 12.10.2010 9:10, Jussi Hirvi napsal(a):
sub httpprint {
my ($r_headers, $r_htmls)=...@_;
if (is_http_compression_enabled()) {
my $zhtml=Compress::Zlib::memGzip(join('',@{$r_htmls}));
if ($zhtml ne '') {
print httpheader(@{$r_headers},
'-Content-Encoding'='gzip',
'-Vary'='Accept-Encoding',
'-Content-Length'=length($zhtml)), $zhtml;
return;
}
}
my $len; foreach (@{$r_htmls}) { $len+=length($_); }
print httpheader(@{$r_headers}, '-Content-Length'=$len), @{$r_htmls};
return;
}
1) Does it include:
use Compress::Zlib;
2) What repo are you using for Openwebmail?
3) You can always use temp hack - disbale gzip -
is_http_compression_enabled()
DH
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Here we go again: SpamAssassin doesn't like the new Perl update...
Dne 1.10.2010 16:34, Gilbert Sebenste napsal(a): On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: Check this out: % sa-update Subroutine NetAddr::IP::UtilPolluted::AF_INET6 redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65. at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/NetAddr/IP/Util.pm line 180 Hi, sa-update and spamd restart works for me. What's the rpm -q spamassasin perl perl-NetAddr-IP and uname -a? DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dovecot IMAP Server
Dne 10.8.2010 14:44, Richard Gliebe napsal(a): version 2 is developer release (see: http://www.dovecot.org/download.html) I'm looking for a stable version 1.2.x http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/dovecot-1.2.x/ DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] Common content for 'Release Notes'
Dne 10.5.2010 22:22, Hardy Beltran Monasterios napsal(a): Hi Since some time ago, I have been contributing as Spanish translator of Release notes (and some other wiki content). The Release notes has some parts which are common for all translated versions, by sample: 'sha1sum' , 'translations' I sugest start to using the macro 'Include' for the next releases. I'm not an MoinMoin expert but AFAIKU this macro is useful for common content. By the moment we (translators) are doing 'copy and paste' Hi Hardy, this is very good point. I have just changed Release Notes 5.5 to include comments for package lists. So right now you can include rpm lists like this: [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.5,,from=##begin-new, to=##end-new)]] [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.5,,from=##begin-updated, to=##end-updated)]] [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.5,,from=##begin-removed, to=##end-removed)]] [[Include(Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.5,,from=##begin-older, to=##end-older)]] I guess I'm gonna to create other marks. Regards, David ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] OT: scsi-target-utils with a ESXi 4 as a iscsi client
Dne 15.3.2010 10:05, carlopmart napsal(a): Hi all, sombedy have tried to use a centOS 5.4 host as a iscsi target for ESXi 4?? any problems?? Or is it best to use NFS??? Thanks. Hi, works pretty well. DH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backup solution to backup /var/spool/imap above 150GB data
Dne 24.2.2010 10:00, Agnello George napsal(a): Hi We have an issue with one of our clients , they have a mail server with the /var/spool/imap partition as 150 GB . They need to take differential backup on to /backup partition ( a different HDD of total 250 GB space ) . We have tried dar , rsync, rdiff and impasync . But its is not sufficing the need as to take a lot of time and consumes a lot of I/O . Is there any back up solution that you can think of , that can work in this situation - open source or proprietary Is seems to me, that you are using mbox format. So, differential backup is hard to achieve. Migrate to maildir, every mail is a file, easy to backup differentially. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] eSATA drive enclosure of a full PC?
Dne 22.2.2010 14:25, Michael Schumacher napsal(a): You may consider using this part: http://www.coolermaster-usa.com/product.php?product_id=2814 The disadvantage is that you have no quick-swap-possibility, but the cooling is better as in hot-swap cases. The box has nice vibe-stoppers so that you have no vibrations on the case. I have several of these boxes and the disks run at least 10C cooler compared to a hot-swap system. And they sell for less than 25$. I'm happy with: http://www.chieftec.eu/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=146Itemid=326 We usually take two pieces, so we have 6HDDs for raid in enclusures and 2 others for os inside the case. Regards, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache bandwidth limiting?
Dne 16.2.2010 2:30, Jason Pyeron napsal(a): Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? Jason, you can find a lot of Apache modules for C4 within my repo: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/letter_m.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/letter_m.group.html Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Call for Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 testers
Hi, I have made complete rebuild and backport of Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 to CentOS 5. Packages come with language packs, debuginfo packages, xulrunner etc. I'm looking for QA testers. Upgrade from distro versions works pretty fine. Thanks, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Call for Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 testers
Dne 12.2.2010 3:08, Rob Kampen napsal(a): David, Happy to test if these are going to be hosted on CentOS Plus. Hope that is the case. Rob Rob, sorry, but this is personal project. I'm not related to Centos team. I've got repo, so you can seamlessly install with yum. If you want to see it within CentosPlus, I'm not the right person to ask. :o). Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] need some help with compiling mod_gnutls
Původní zpráva Od: Tobias Weisserth tobias.weisse...@gmail.com Předmět: [CentOS] need some help with compiling mod_gnutls Datum: 27.1.2010 20:23:28 Hi everybody, I want to build mod_gnutls. The problem: CentOS' version of GNUTLS is too old to link against, so I compiled and installed GNUTLS from source and put it into /opt where it doesn't hurt the already installed GNUTLS. Now I have trouble linking against this version as the autoconf buildchain in mod_gnutls does not find the newer version. I tried like this: ./configure -with-libgnutls=/opt/lib ./configure -with-libgnutls=/opt/bin I get this from configure: checking for libgnutls - version = 2.4.0... no *** An old version of LIBGNUTLS (1.4.1) was found. *** You need a version of LIBGNUTLS newer than 2.4.0. The latest version of *** LIBGNUTLS is always available from ftp://gnutls.hellug.gr/pub/gnutls. *** *** If you have already installed a sufficiently new version, this error *** probably means that the wrong copy of the pkg-config shell script is *** being found. The easiest way to fix this is to remove the old version *** of LIBGNUTLS, but you can also set the PKG_CONFIG environment to point to the *** correct copy of pkg-config. (In this case, you will have to *** modify your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or edit /etc/ld.so.conf *** so that the correct libraries are found at run-time)) configure: error: *** *** libgnutls was not found. You may want to get it from *** http://www.gnutls.org/ *** I don't understand this. I already set the PKG_CONFIG_PATH to /opt/lib/pkgconfig (according to pkg-config manpage) but that doesn't work. What's the easiest way to make mod_gnutls link against GNUTLS as installed in /opt/lib? thanks, Tobias W. Tobias, take a look at my repo: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/i386/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/x86_64/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-tls/stable/i386/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-tls/stable/x86_64/repoview/ David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] read only sftp access
Andrei F napsal(a): Hi, I'm trying to setup read-only SFTP repo. The directory that I'm planning to make available via sftp needs to have only read-only access. My issue is that this specific directory is already available for read write access but under different credentials. When I try to login via my read-only account, openssh spits out an error about incorrect permissions. Any idea how can I share the same directory via sftp under two different usernames under the same filesystem permissions? Hi, you want ACLs. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Who's eating our bandwidth?
Niki Kovacs napsal(a): Hi, I've recently setup a new server for our public libraries. For the last two years, this has been my first big job, since it involves networking eleven small to medium size public libraries. Niki, limit access as much as possible. Geoip is your friend. You can also limit access per libraries subnets. The second: You can have low resources in case your web app is Java based. And finally, make sure the site is not hacked e.g. allow_url_fopen... David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel
Todd Denniston napsal(a): I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so I was about to install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and another in epel. epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that would suggest sticking with the extras version instead? Or even reasons other than the shiny version number on the epel one to go with it? Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the CentOS team keeps it around to do the matching builds? Thanks for the clarifications. Hi Todd, I use mock from our repo: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mock.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mock.html David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] memcached-1.4.1 and C4
Hi,
Is there someone successfully running memcached-1.4.1 on Centos 4 with
centosplus php? I'm trying to use memcached under Centos 4. I can set
values fine but
'get' returns:
[r...@rakosnicek eshop]# php d.php
PHP Warning: Memcached::get(): bad type specifier while parsing
parameters in /var/www/d.php on line 6
NULL
string(7) SUCCESS
array(1) {
[lhost:11211]=
string(5) 1.4.1
}
The code is:
?php
$m = new Memcached();
$m-addServer('localhost', 11211);
$m-set('foo', 100);
var_dump($m-get('foo'));
var_dump($m-getResultMessage());
var_dump($m-getVersion());
?
Memcat returns:
[r...@rakosnicek eshop]# memcat --servers=localhost foo
100
Package version are:
[r...@rakosnicek eshop]# rpm -q httpd memcached php-pecl-memcached php |
sort
httpd-2.0.52-41.ent.4.centos4
memcached-1.4.1-2.el4.hrb
php-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10
php-pecl-memcached-1.0.0-3.el4.hrb
Thanks,
David
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Persisting iproute2 routes and rules
Diogo Sperb Schneider napsal(a): Greetings! I have defined a few routes and rules with: ip route add ... ip rule add ... And now I'd like to persist those so they're loaded when the system boots up. I'm doing this by means of calling a specific script from /etc/rc.d/rc.local but I believe there must be something cleaner than that, like another existing file. Thanks in advance, Diogo Hi, --[ File: /etc/sysconfig/static-routes ]--(0644, root, root, 122)--- any net 192.168.36.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.38.254 any net 192.168.37.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.38.253 David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mod_mono on centos5?
Dave napsal(a): Hi, Thanks for your reply. To be honest i really don't want to torture myself with this, my network switch is giving me enough grief right now, but i don't have a choice. I've got the rpmforge repo enabled, but a yum install isn't giving me the package. Thanks. Dave. Hi, you can find mod_mono within our repo. Status is testing. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/testing/x86_64/repoview/ Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mysql-server-5.0.82sp1-1.el4_8 upgrade
Hi, There has been update to mysql within the centosplus repository on 26th August. Please be aware, that you might need to upgrade tables after the server upgrade. 1) run CHECK TABLE 2) if the response is 'Table upgrade required. Please do REPAIR TABLE `tablename` to fix it!' 3) do run :o) REPAIR TABLE 4) good point is again CHECK TABLE 4) good point is OPTIMIZE TABLE Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] apache virtual host load monitoring
Sergey Smirnov napsal(a): Hi All, is there any tools/mods for apache2 which are you using to monitor the load of every virtual host? (e.g. mod_proctitle) thanks Hi, mod_watch see: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/letter_m.group.html I'm going to look at mod_proctitle to add it to my repo. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] apache virtual host load monitoring
Sergey Smirnov napsal(a): Hi All, is there any tools/mods for apache2 which are you using to monitor the load of every virtual host? (e.g. mod_proctitle) thanks mod_proctitle is BSD only. Some solution is http://blog.antage.name/posts/%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B8-apache-2.html David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a): So we begin to actively drive away people now who say they appreciate the distribution or others who are actively trying to help? Sorry, please make it clear that this is *YOUR POINT* of view and not of all the people who are making CentOS happen at the moment. Same goes for Johnny's replies: What crawled over your liver that you actively tell people to piss off? Ralph Ralph, thank you for your words. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure
Ned Slider napsal(a): The bit that causes all the confusion here is the C in the name CentOS. It would all be so much clearer if the project would just rename to EntOS because that's what it is. I guess the Community bit refers to the community of users, nothing more. Without the community there's no devel group and vice versa. Sometimes I feel that Enterprise bit is only 100pct binary compatibility. So where have lost those two bits? David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Open Letter to Lance Davis
Kai Schaetzl napsal(a): I think these are fair questions, but a bit premature. Give the team time to settle this, uhm, let's call it, mess. I'm sure once this matter is resolved the team will also give more information about the new structure and funding etc. Patience, folks! One thing at a time! Kai Well, let's hope that these fair questions are going to be answered. Project needs time to settle down now, so let's wait. The community can create questions list meanwhile. The project badly needs openness. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability
RedShift napsal(a): According to a commenter, this should provide a temporary countermeasure: iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DROP -m u32 --u32 '30270xF=5' Haven't tested it, would like to know the results... Well, good point, but Centos does not ship libipt_u32.so. Even more Centos 4.x is now undergoing rebuild process, so no updates even security updates are being released. Which is something I can accept. Those looking for patched bind for Centos 4.x may use packages I have built with CVE-2009-0696 patch. http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repoview/letter_b.group.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repoview/letter_b.group.html Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability
luc...@lastdot.org napsal(a): Well done, David but there's a little problem with those rpms: Preparing...### [100%] package bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed package bind-utils-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-utils-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed package bind-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed package bind-chroot-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 (which is newer than bind-chroot-9.2.4-30.el4.hrb.2.1) is already installed Maybe you can bump the version a bit. Right... 30.el4_7.2 30.el4.hrb.2.1 :o) I do not want to change the version more because: - I do not want to have el4_7, it's not Centos release - EL4.8 ships 30.el4_8.4 So I do not want to release 31.el4_7.2 ... As to included patch, it the very same code RH released within the latest errata. Regards, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BIND vulnerability
luc...@lastdot.org napsal(a): Ok, thanks, but where exactly am I to see something useful on people.redhat.com? I can only see an image. Maybe he is pointing to http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/. But I do not see the point. This is RHEL 4.8 version with patch. Anyone running Centos 4.8? I'm still with 4.7 so bind-libs-9.2.4-30.el4_7.2 with patch is the way for me, far better then having unpatched bind, waiting another couple of weeks to get bind updated finally. Sorry. David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????
Karanbir Singh napsal(a): yup. We have already looked into the possibility of getting updates out during a point release cycle, and will prolly be moving to that process with the next point release ( 5.4 ). Karanbir, glad to hear this. We have been discussing this a lot of times. Hope the process's really going to happen. It's very important to not stop releasing security updates within the distro rebuild time. Thanks, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum-3.2.8 for Centos 4 backport, part II.
Hi, I have again worked on yum 3.2.8 for Centos 4 today, after a long time. The result is backported package yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.5 which is the upgrade of yum-3.2.8-9.el4.hrb.2.1.3 I've been using smoothly for quite a long time. Packages are in testing repos: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/i386/repodata/ http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/testing/x86_64/repodata/ I'd like to ask for QA tests. This patched version passes all the internal yum tests (aka 'make test'). Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Slowloris Apache DoS - solution
Hi, Those who are interested in anti Sloworis solution. I have built and packed mod_antiloris for C4/5. Packages are to be found at: http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/i386/repoview/mod_antiloris.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_antiloris.html Works pretty fine. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
Dag Wieers napsal(a): The difference is that you can only install one distribution, but you can install tons of incompatible repositories. And the believe that one repo will rule them all (which is what Fedora and EPEL wants you to believe) is just debunked by yourself above :-) The most important reason I still have RPMforge is because I don't want to let my users down because there is no real upgrade path (the fact that you for some reason need RPMforge is the proof). If the last user wants to turn off the light, then I know I can start doing something else ;-) PS To be honest, we could use some more people that want to help, if something is missing or not being maintained, offer to maintain it ! But don't expect me (or dries, christoph, fabian, ...) to fix it because that simply *does* *not* *scale*. PS2 I discussed with christoph to set up a proper project management system that would encourage collaboration more. But we don't need more bugs, we need more people to help fix bugs, really. I'd like to say this. Dag et al have done wonderful job and I thank you for it Dag. But we (the community, fellow I know, myself) have been wanting and willing to cooperate on much huge basis, I personally feel this way. I'm talking about rpmrepo.org project. I guess Dag's interest in this project was driven by the problems with his repo too which some of you are complaining about. The aim was to create platform, not strictly focused on enterprise. We wanted create something mixed. Something with enterprise, testing, backport levels and efforts. The project has been started but never really haven't happened. So we have centosplus and extras which are the repos with access denied for packages inclusion. Dag's rpmforge which is so huge with a lot of dependencies not suitable for testing/bleeding edge/alternative packages. So what's the suitable repo? That's why people are going to run own repos :o( I do it myself. I guess we need suitable platform we can use within the centos community and we need it now. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
Dag Wieers napsal(a): The biggest problem for me is that we do not have the infrastructure in RPMforge. I still need to build the x86 and x86_64 stuff, Fabian does the PPC packages. Yes, we don't. As for me, there's no time and need to reinvent the wheel. There are many etalons to look at (Suse builder, fedora infrastructure). Various people maintain SPEC files and contribute changes. But they only get pushed when Fabian or me initiate it. I don't want to sit in the middle, but without setting up new infrastructure and processes we'll continue to use what works now. I can't see any easy way to change the state too. It's not optimal, but it works. And we know about things that can be improved, but without people helping with QA and automate reporting problems, we just continue the way it is. Yes, it works and it works for me too. But everyday praxis shows that it 's been overcome. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Missing php* packages
przemol...@poczta.fm napsal(a): Hello, I am trying to migrate one of our fedora-based servers to CentOS. Our PHP developers doesn't allow us to switch because there are no crucial (for them) php packages: php-smarty You can find php-Smarty within hrb repo, php-adodb within rpmforge, php-accelerator php-eaccelerator within the CentosPlus. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Mod_gnutls
Bart Baars napsal(a): Hi All, Is anyone using mod_gnutls on CentOS 5.3 x64? A while ago there was a rpm in the CentOs-testing repo, but it disappeared.. so does anyone have a recent version? Cheers, Bart Hi Bart, I do http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/i386/repoview/mod_gnutls.html http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-tls/stable/x86_64/repoview/mod_gnutls.html Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
