[CentOS-announce] Welcome Thomas and Patrick to CentOS Project Governing Board
Hi, The CentOS Governing Board of Directors is pleased to appoint two new Directors to be added to the Governing Board, effective 8th April 2020: Thomas Oulevey [1] and Patrick Riehecky [2]. The community will instantly recognise both from their long standing and well established support for the CentOS Project over the years, initially as consumers and community participants, and in more recent times as active across various initiatives in and around the project space. Over the last sixteen years the CentOS project has established itself as a critical component in the open source ecosystem online. In order to maintain this leading role and help drive success for the wider open source ecosystem, we are moving to a more contributor-centric model. A key part of enabling this goal is to evolve our transparent governance. Pat and Thomas have shown keen interest in participating in this specific endeavour, and we are excited to welcome them to the team, helping us get there. Thomas (alphacc) works in the Controls group within the CERN Beams department [3]. He has contributed to the CentOS Project since 2012, as a member of the infrastructure team. He helped to bootstrap a few Special Interest Groups, helped the QA team with reports, and now mainly designs and improves the Community Build Service [4]. Thomas’s sponsor on the Board is Mike McLean, who will help oversee his transition to project leadership. Patrick (jcpunk) works at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory [5]. He is part of the Scientific Linux team [6] and works on systems that perform Data Acquisition for various experiments at Fermilab. Although a long time member of the community, formally Pat began working with the CentOS Community when Fermilab decided to use CentOS 8 [7] as its EL8-base platform. Pat’s sponsor is Johnny Hughes, who will help oversee his transition to project leadership. Please join me in welcoming them to the team, Regards Karanbir Singh Project Lead, The CentOS Project [1] https://wiki.centos.org/ThomasOulevey [2] https://wiki.centos.org/PatrickRiehecky [3] https://beams.cern [4] https://cbs.centos.org [5] https://beams.cern [6] https://www.scientificlinux.org/about/who-makes-scientific-linux/ [7] https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-ANNOUNCE;11d6001.1904 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 8 and CentOS Streams
e38192400212796085b7996f21828aa8f8a72d44b64059572eb8c725e13be4cc CentOS-Stream-x86_64-dvd1.iso: 8572108800 bytes SHA256 559715017959f5967d2b9876bd27f46d8a740e1d02f59dfb8fd5e7114dd5cc79 The iso files are also available for direct download from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/isos/x86_64 and http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/isos/x86_64 Other media, including container, cloud, live media etc will be posted in the near future. -- Events We try and organise Dojo's in various parts of the world as a one day event, to bring together people who use CentOS and others who are keen to learn about CentOS. The day's focus is on sharing technical knowledge and success stories. Its also a great place to meet and talk about upcoming technologies and learn how others are using them on CentOS. Dojo at fosdem - https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2020 Please track the page at https://wiki.centos.org/Events/ for upcoming events, and if you would like to help organise something, do get in touch with us. -- Getting Help The CentOS ecosystem is sustained by community driven help and guidance. The best place to start for new users is at http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp -- Thanks I'd also like to thank our donors and sponsors for their continued support for the project. Additionally, the CentOS QA team, the Core SIG team and all the associated SIG's. And thanks to everyone who contributed with ideas, code, test feedback and promoting CentOS into the ecosystem. Enjoy! - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | https://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOSProject signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1804) on x86_64 aarch64 i386 ppc64 ppc64le
: 8db40f3844a5077553733ab445fe1cdc72734aa5dc8e977fccc7a91e3c6750bb CentOS-7-aarch64-Everything-1804.iso c376ac10f3ca4fad28100eb7cb12673b47d6013a32fff721791c2b85b95f88a3 CentOS-7-aarch64-Minimal-1804.iso 9ee5249242321642f8fd17f7b393cc2fd882d3a650b7e3d6cf056f97741d0cef CentOS-7-aarch64-NetInstall-1804.iso Details for Armhfp are posted in its own announce email, following shortly. Additional Images The container, Vagrant, Cloud and Atomic Host images are being prepared and will be released in the next few days. Look for an announcement posted to the centos-announce list for more information on availability for these in the coming days. -- Getting Help The CentOS ecosystem is sustained by community driven help and guidance. The best place to start for new users is at http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp We are also on social media, you can find the project: on Twitter at : http://twitter.com/CentOSProject on Facebook at : https://www.facebook.com/groups/centosproject/ on LinkedIn at : https://www.linkedin.com/groups/22405 And you will find the core team and a majority of the contributors on irc, on freenode.net in #centos ; talking about the finer points of distribution engineering and platform enablement. -- Contributors This release was made possible due to the hard work of many people, foremost on that list are the Red Hat Engineers for producing a great distribution and the CentOS QA team, without them CentOS Linux would look very different. Many of the team went further and beyond expectations to bring this release to you, and I would like to thank everyone for their help. We are also looking for people to get involved with the QA process in CentOS, if you would like to join this please introduce yourself on the centos-devel list (http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel ). Finally, please join me in thanking the donors who all make this possible for us. Enjoy the fresh new release! -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki content management via automation
On 21/02/18 22:30, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > That's a good question, as we'll also have to migration for moinmoin if > we can't find a support path to migrate to supported version anyway. > So first question (already asked on the list) : is there a way to get in > touch with moin people willing to help/assist us ? (as their upgrade > tool wasn't working to test migration from 1.6 to 1.7) it would be good if someone on the docs team ( or docs focused could take this up, I am far too removed from implementation at this point to drive that conversation productively ). Other than that, +1 to engage moin upstream > And then too : is there a way to consume a kind of API for moin that > would then meet the "content management via automation" requirement. Or > do we have to also investigate directly another solution (like > mediawiki) and so migration ? does media-wiki have an api ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] wiki content management via automation
Hi the CentOS Cloud images and other things are now built from end to end automated pipelines, but the wiki content corresponding to them isnt. Is there something that can be used to do this automation ? I have done some stuff many many years ago, via directly mangling content on the wiki objects, but that might not be the best way forward. thoughts ? Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:0014 Important CentOS 7 linux-firmware Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:0014 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0014 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: dad80246e21277864476614560cae38820cc147b9ceb44dd0d1776e3935b05df iwl1000-firmware-39.31.5.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm dbb0a9095b11d9af2b8db8f160e1004ead7f5b07add216df63c843e2ac470259 iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm 1ff7d3347a2759b15818d71817d5055643bcc4a9f7b091d186006948cf75a3f0 iwl105-firmware-18.168.6.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm e807e3cc6faa0be6df4675d9810db6292a534bc0c3f9c714dcc7c92fed0ba4fd iwl135-firmware-18.168.6.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm d24d6225079ec7d7870ca06686c67d70f9d034af1167b36570e8506fdf02 iwl2000-firmware-18.168.6.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm 2eebc03a19e54f4b072f21886f02e43bdac41ff5e8290d9eb7c62e3ef1ed7352 iwl2030-firmware-18.168.6.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm d154f7ddb5ccca2772604f907d7a3c06e1b2f95b35665e81363226c98a9115c4 iwl3160-firmware-22.0.7.0-57.el7.noarch.rpm aaba72a90838c5dee3373004ee00530e3f43fbd0b9cd634223d02ea500c3cd6d iwl3945-firmware-15.32.2.9-57.el7.noarch.rpm f18caaca13e3ed06f43483870ecdc57ff6c8796bf3cb8375822519d0ced3b659 iwl4965-firmware-228.61.2.24-57.el7.noarch.rpm 257fe78f77c4e1c5c9bea3873421411c77020c12d907b1d7c511e7e96eaa3190 iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1_1-57.el7.noarch.rpm e9edf8b527e94302b0572ce1e3f0e91d62e9d11f74cf3ad1c0350c8e23684acc iwl5150-firmware-8.24.2.2-57.el7.noarch.rpm b63dc1829cca0afbb4a6e5681cebf54509cc4c507ab0bad6553856c4063616ed iwl6000-firmware-9.221.4.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm 8abb25db6c0dcedfa0c11f87028521f5098a88374dcb99376f485bda4596a567 iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.3-57.el7.noarch.rpm d35951cc21bfccae24e6611ad03901ac1fe0183614add09b2b04528a72d3ea4b iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.2-57.el7.noarch.rpm 8a2cd4dbabdbdcc36ed46a2529c07b9873716981610082db5b40ae134e12ee3d iwl6050-firmware-41.28.5.1-57.el7.noarch.rpm 357388ce543ce9714ebffbadc15ab1e3969c4f1256d6f1132f619c82afdc iwl7260-firmware-22.0.7.0-57.el7.noarch.rpm 75a235701d30e685ca87945e0dd583bda08e254f9078d50b3d466af4d5e3cfe6 iwl7265-firmware-22.0.7.0-57.el7.noarch.rpm 16164fc1c681f5a04a14879041e66855aa434c9c9c30d722a273519896b0f7b7 linux-firmware-20170606-57.gitc990aae.el7.noarch.rpm Source: ffa8541e30f72d79d88740d418943668d1da9535ebbee0df3c61ad4d7d576cdc linux-firmware-20170606-57.gitc990aae.el7.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:0012 Important CentOS 7 microcode_ctl Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:0012 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0012 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: ccb96b47da6ce420c39a38d09e57adcc7ab3696c721d081fee94298f19fc6cab microcode_ctl-2.1-22.2.el7.x86_64.rpm Source: 589fe27443e43fd6549f56e39968cf515d1cd2448dc922bf0cc980fc651f880d microcode_ctl-2.1-22.2.el7.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:0007 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:0007 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 320ab3bd00bd1f051c69f65f2d4cd6ab64585f977d9cd7a52e64e8f8147894fc kernel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm 0eefdec5447d3ed2781f30d093e22f4654e8af201e1e8058a57876d1baf2ee64 kernel-abi-whitelists-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.noarch.rpm 5137d0db8632342edfb355ce5bb0a4b4b80d5ffd4b9950bb8dcfcd78e4b8a9dc kernel-debug-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm 882a6522bdafaa697173ff7adedd2cd6ceee5c4a6aa0cd1cb4cf042789420c78 kernel-debug-devel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm 9c0d7753c649d68cd25b212ee573cec37dc2211891444224e502128fcffdf301 kernel-devel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm d2005d6a85f2ddd627290dd4cd4d2084215ef45cd8b3f66077b68fe2b0cce61e kernel-doc-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.noarch.rpm 34d8682b2df1e47c9675f913fbfb129420cce219beaf7985c607a69ccdb3e064 kernel-headers-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm fd3eaf598546bcb502e5e7293d0301b48774c9358dd320b7e53bd042dfae7094 kernel-tools-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm 3c53034adc4c942a02f1dd72f0adf688f558867caf086b5b239169262b75f570 kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm 91153ae59d0acf585201b9a5b453ed8e6504651bf114e3c21c725ce42c8675c5 kernel-tools-libs-devel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm 8ef1d6c1ef77af60bbb680fa58b1d15f7901c21220c7e5db05ed56f7b17c perf-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm b1f7bf92063bce0cec6286845686bc6ef96db126bdaa8987703b21a736a1a509 python-perf-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.x86_64.rpm Source: b7756ceda51a35942e03d553f0ec6049ba2520c89e0d66e8e2cdae88f6db0d6a kernel-3.10.0-693.11.6.el7.src.rpm Note: 1) This is a widespread issue with potentially huge impact, we appreciate any help in spreading the word around so maximum number of users are able to find out, and patch their systems. 2) Upstream is curating information around this issue at https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/speculativeexecution - information on that page would be helpful for most people on CentOS Linux as well. 3) Please reach out to us at #centos on irc.freenode.net for any feedback, comments, questions or concerns. -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) on x86_64
/649159/ ( please note that you must register ahead of time to attend ) -- Getting Help The CentOS ecosystem is sustained by community driven help and guidance. The best place to start for new users is at http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp We are also on social media, you can find the project: on Twitter at : http://twitter.com/CentOSProject on Facebook at : https://www.facebook.com/groups/centosproject/ on LinkedIn at : https://www.linkedin.com/groups/22405 And you will find the core team and a majority of the contributors on irc, on freenode.net in #centos ; talking about the finer points of distribution engineering and platform enablement. -- Contributors This release was made possible due to the hard work of many people, foremost on that list are the Red Hat Engineers for producing a great distribution and the CentOS QA team, without them CentOS Linux would look very different. Many of the team went further and beyond expectations to bring this release to you, and I would like to thank everyone for their help. We are also looking for people to get involved with the QA process in CentOS, if you would like to join this please introduce yourself on the centos-devel list (http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel ). As some people would have noticed there is no i686 build for 1708 as yet - we have run into a couple of build and dependency issues that could use help. So if you are keen to get involved this is a great opportunity. Finally, please join me in thanking the donors who all make this possible for us. Enjoy the fresh new release! -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-docs] Splitting the container pipeline page in the wiki
hi Bama since there are other things going on in the container space around centos, I was thinking maybe we can setup a /Container page, and then have a /Container/Registry and a /Container/Pipeline page each. the pipeline page can talk about the service, code and run setup. and the registry page can talk about howto get content in there, what content is already there and urls to the user setup and consumer stuff. would that work for you ? this would also unblock content coming up like /Container/Docker etc and the /Container page can perhaps just be an index pointing to the relevant info. regards, -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-virt] Copying CentOS AMIs for EBS encryption
Hi Andrew, let me look into this for our next image build On 04/08/17 22:11, Andrew Hodgson wrote: > I, > > Just wondering if anyone was able to look at this option with the current > images or could share some tips on copying the image to another AWS account > so we can use EBS encryption on the volume without tainting the image too > much? > > Thanks. > Andrew. > > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Hodgson > Sent: 27 July 2017 15:09 > To: centos-v...@lists.centos.org > Subject: Copying CentOS AMIs for EBS encryption > > Hi, > > I am trying to copy the latest CentOS image to my own AWS account so that I > can enable EBS volume encryption. It currently looks like the option when > sharing the image is not enabled to allow direct copying of the snapshots, > and I am wondering if this could be looked at? I can start an instance with > this AMI, then create a new snapshot for the purpose of enabling EBS volume > encryption, but I want to keep the image as clean as possible, and am worried > if I run the image then some scripts will get ran that will customise the > image with keys etc. > > If there is a better way to do this then happy to discuss. > > Thanks, > Andrew. > ___ > CentOS-virt mailing list > CentOS-virt@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS and CentOS EDU at Windows Store...
Hi Markus, this sort of content would be good to get onto the wiki in the aims/goals section of the SIG proposal. Let us know if your edit rights for the page are not working etc -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc On 11/07/17 04:29, Markus McLaughlin wrote: > We need to make CentOS and CentOS EDU available at the Windows Store; > for those who don't want to dual boot, can use it... > > Reference : > http://news.softpedia.com/news/ubuntu-linux-is-now-available-for-download-from-the-microsoft-windows-store-516907.shtml > > > Markus McLaughlin > > ___ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Markus McLaughlin Intro
Hi Markus, Welcome onbard - is you wiki user MarkusMcLaughlin ? -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc On 07/07/17 15:32, Markus McLaughlin wrote: > My name is Markus McLaughlin, I am coming on board the CentOS EDUcation > SIG Project. I want to bring my resourcefulness and talents to this > very ambitious project. Debian has already made available its own EDU > distribution. It's time for CentOS to "step up," and offer its own > service. Windows and MACs have dominated > the education market far too long. It's time to bring free and open > source software to those schools and > students who can't afford to use either of their systems. > > I think there should be two forms of the CentOS EDU distribution: 1. 4GB > "Core" with the bare essentials, including offline Wikipedia access, and > a library of free e-textbooks for those who don't have broadband > internet access. > 2. 8GB "Everything" with additional software like Audacity, GIMP, > Blender, Scribus, Inkscape, etc. CentOS EDU > should provide a configuration menu of all the different interfaces, > GNOME, KDE, etc., based on the Anaconda > installer. It should also provide Windows compatibility so MS Office > can be used instead of LibreOffice. > > Another option that Debian EDU probably does not have is, why not have > CentOS EDU be compatible with the > Linux layer of Windows 10? The CORE could be accessed inside Windows 10 > so it would be a "win win." > > I would like to see CentOS EDU paired with the Raspberry Pi Foundation > as well, presenting it to those who can't afford a full PC. The Pi > would make an inexpensive means to support poor students. For $100.00, > a Pi with CentOS EDU 32gb microsd card included, would open up a whole > new world! > > Please consider my ideas! :D > > Regards, > Markus McLaughlin > marknetproductions.com > ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Request WIKI for docker / docker swarm on CentOS 7.x
On 04/07/17 16:30, -=X.L.O.R.D=- wrote: > Dear Sir, > > I would like to contribute Rancher / Docker Swarm on CentOS and related > WIKI. > > Please advise what do I need to for this WIKI. Thank you! > > > > Xlord > Hi, you will need a real name, full name for the wiki access. Also, can you share some details on exactly what you intend to post to the wiki itself ? as in how / what the Rancher context here would be ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] GPX files
Hi Martin, On 31/05/17 00:02, J Martin Rushton wrote: > I have a Garmin 78s marine GPS receiver and it stores tracks in GPX > format. This is an XML encoded set of points giving longitude, > latitude, time and sea depth. Garmin support viewing this via their > Garmin Express product, but there only seem to be Windows and Mac > versions. I've emailed them and await a reply. In the mean time, does > anyone know of any Linux products that will emable me to view track data > on a decent sized screen? I don't want to re-invent the wheel by coding > up a hack myself. I road travel quite a bit, and have a Garmin Dezl 760D with my own profiles on there. In both of my trucks, I've got gps recievers running off raspberry pi3's, running CentOS7/armv7 images. I bring all this together on my laptop, running viking and gpsbabel under the hood. This allows me to do all my route planning on either google-maps, google-earth, or viking and all the tracks from the different devices come together as layers. The POI tracking and specially the topo tracking on viking is pretty good. There is no viable road-route planner that works on Linux at this point though. Thats the one thing that the garmin apps do really well. As a workaround, I've used viamichelin to good effect ( and wikiloc ); and all the tools and bits you need to track and refactor on the road, come together really well on CentOS. HTH -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's Next
On 17/05/17 04:34, Eugene Poole wrote: > OK, AMD has announced it's new line of server and desktop processors. > What level of CentOS has been tested on them? OK then, when will CentOS > be tested on them? Or do we wait for Red Hat? > off the wire, I've had lots of positive reports from the new AMD chips running CentOS Linux 7. So my question to you would be, were you able to track down a specific problem ? or are you looking for more general feedback. If its the later, then yes, CentOS Linux 7/x86_64 works fine out of the box with these new chips. You might want to do your own benchmarks for interfaces and components eg. pci bus etc. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack
On 12/04/17 17:26, Nux! wrote: > To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with anything. Dont need to replace it, MatterMost will bridge channels from one interface to another, with a mostly usable interface. > So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. > > If we go Mattermost, can we have a searchable public archive of the chats? > Something search engines can index and we can point people to? yeah, that can be factored in as well. There were concerns in the past from people not wanting their chat's logged and published, since in many cases as is with CentOS, people are talking about problems and potential solutions to internet facing infra / production services etc regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Enterprise Linux Slack
On 12/04/17 13:23, Andrew Holway wrote: > > Thoughts? Experiances? > been talking with the mattermost people to get an instance up in centos.org space - more open source, more privacy and better terms of service. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: systemd Poll
On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote: > So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you > still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? I think the points been made, can we all move along and let this thread be. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-virt] Centos 6.9 AWS Images and c4-8xlarge
On 05/04/17 14:56, John Peacock wrote: > > We want to be able to usethe 10G networking that c4.8xlarge instances > provide and we want to base all of our images directly on the official > Centos6 release AMI. > Can you try ami-500d8546 i us-east-1 and let me know if that works for the c4.8large ? I've asked, a few times, for the CentOS Linux images in AMP to be enabled for all instance types where the image will work. So if its not being enabled, there is a chance the image isnt suitable, and we should find out why. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] Timeline of release of centos-openshift-origin 1.4
On 27/01/17 06:04, vedran.bartoni...@tieto.com wrote: > Hello, > Would someone know when to expect to have package origin-master.1.4.0 in > repository centos-openshift-origin? > Right now the package with version 1.4.0 is available in repository > centos-openshift-origin-testing. > Thanks, Vedran > > > > > From: CentOS <centos-boun...@centos.org> on behalf of > vedran.bartoni...@tieto.com <vedran.bartoni...@tieto.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 8:53 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] centos-openshift-origin > > ?Hi, > > Would someone know when to expect to have package origin-master.1.4.0 in repo > centos-openshift-origin? > > Right now the package is available in centos-openshift-origin-testing. > > -Vedran > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > 1.4.1 is available now -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Latest CentOS-7 image on cloud.centos.org has incorrect checksum
On 09/02/17 19:20, Jared Baker wrote: > Good day, > > I initially posted this issue on CentOS-mirror a week ago but did not > receive any response. > > I'm looking for a resolution to a small issue with the cloud image > repository for the latest CentOS-7 image. > > As far as I understand, the latest release of the CentOS-7 image should > always be posted to http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_ > 64-GenericCloud.qcow2 > > The checksum of this file should match the highest numbered version of the > cloud image listed in http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/sha256sum.txt > > However, the actual checksum for CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.qcow2 is > returning as b56ed1a3a489733d3ff91aca2011f8720c0540b9aa27e46dd0b4f575318dd1fa > which matches for CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1608.qcow2 but NOT > CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1612.qcow2. > > The latest image available should be CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1612.qcow2 > with a checksum of 559bebb4abb2fdf3bd88c917cc11ef > b1975bfe4494e666d133a3148ec4e6225d. > > To further the confusion, the 'Last modified' image is > CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1611.qcow2 and not -1612. > > I picked up on this discrepancy because I have a script that monitors & > updates our openstack images when new images become available for various > distributions. > > If someone could please correct these inconsistencies it would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Jared Baker > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > let me see if we can get this fixed and cleared out a bit -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS dojo in Brussels 3rd Feb
hi everyone, just a quick reminder that we only have a few more places available at the CentOS Dojo next week Friday : https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2017 If you are in the area, or able to make it into the area, do come by. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1611) on x86_64
and organise Dojos in various parts of the world as a one day event, to bring together people who use CentOS and others who are keen to learn about CentOS. The day's focus is on sharing technical knowledge and success stories. It's also a great place to meet and talk about upcoming technologies and learn how others are using them on CentOS Linux. Our next Dojo coming up is in Brussels, on the 3rd Feb 2017. Details are being posted at https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2017 If you would like to help organise a Dojo in your area, do drop by the centos-promo list at http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-pro mo - -- Getting Help The CentOS ecosystem is sustained by community driven help and guidance. The best place to start for new users is at http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp - -- Contributors This release was made possible due to the hard work of many people, foremost on that list are the Red Hat Engineers for producing a great distribution and the CentOS QA team, without them CentOS Linux would look very different. We are also looking for people to get involved with the QA process in CentOS, if you would like to join this please introduce yourself on the centos-devel list (http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel ). - -- Thanks I would also like to thank our donors and sponsors for their continued support for the project. And to everyone who contributed with ideas, code, test feedback, and promoting CentOS Linux into the ecosystem. Enjoy! - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYTuGdAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtduAIAMnwYbHwCn9eF4Ia6zMqyJYq 9qXzGtu0hriv7JG+Y4QcKDedUuaFd0cSnhSW6yqK0W7y96YaGhVfGFQ6OCCb+0YI kXMOo1GcajJaMfNZ+y4Gi4hHa7vVn33xgMYA3mTHZdY/ynJzkfzNc6lJI5yVko1m ya5ASKIUYdfR92xqNq6QYz5H06e5nS4zDnfN9rASRQn5R3BxXfn/4/sR9I0woLpU KluNnQ7N7swZXscH+/g5IKOfORhUBVHx1Mcp9+QDC+OR2eMVfJ+WHJ8v7PHywRxI GBLnWchQhnCF8AB0UbwSYARr3DrFag7SaPH7k+/78vErNOS+E3etHL96LRr0gWo= =NZVk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS-7 x86_64 AMIs and consistent network device naming
On 04/11/16 11:18, Jinesh Choksi wrote: > Hello, > > Re: > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html/7.3_Release_Notes/bug_fixes_general_updates.html > > Are there any upcoming plans for turning off the use of legacy interface > names in the next official CentOS 7.x AMI? > > Currently, both the official RHEL 7.3 GA AMI and the latest available > official CentOS-7 x86_64 AMI use legacy interface names via either: > > - "net.ifnames=0" kernel boot parameter > or > - "ln -vs /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules" > > As I'm setting up some automation which will use the official CentOS 7 > AMI, I'm wondering whether to switch on the new naming scheme manually > and pre-empt the switch over or wait until the official AMIs switch over. > > Also, will the next CentOS 7 AMI start using NetworkManager instead of > the traditional ifcfg-* scripts? would making these changes not break the existing automation that folks might have in place ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-announce] Updated Vagrant Box's are now available : 1609
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Updated Vagrant box's are now available for CentOS Linux 7 and CentOS Linux 6 for x86_64. These are available, as in the past, for the Libvirt and the VirtualBox providers in Vagrant. We have also enabled the vmware providers, for anyone using Vmware's products for backing Vagrant on Linux, MacOS or Windows. ref: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/6 https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/7 Release Notes for these images are published at : https://seven.centos.org/2016/10/updated-centos-vagrant-images-available - -v1609-01/ We are doing all of our work, including build scripts and build content for these Vagrant Box's as a part of the CentOS Cloud Instance SIG. And host the content for contribution and participation at https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build/tree/master/vagrant - - I would like to invite everyone to come join us and help extend the scope of this work, as well as improve the current results. regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYAPekAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtNK8H+gK051yYnUuNnU8kJgT0+nim /iOQHfJeg24w/pObUOl58v1/aAEUuLP2z/KvqEVCAfjWKRsO6I8+GjnFs5CdEj1v p+QpE7tyriu0Al2vseXlBjIuSLG8ELH16gFDZnLvzWnWItD5tm1T2eHtnoGimRBR 3XK/8BM50mqie7GBQeCMTbg0YygFWxTpTE2UipwtYjHoH0nBwXCUNWWkOV+z7qWM vg7kRBizt6NC++A4uROewk4Ez+jRvrmqqRrjc9V5peMBG2NALpS10hTqI3MUDuhI uvOFUycv1ZlBtWmou+vbkF0g2yPsFhrFa2WuLkG/olR45EmFfJ9/wKJC5zsl7RE= =xAPy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format
On 11/10/16 13:16, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
>>
>> did you look in the directory to see what is there?
>>
>> http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/
>>
>
> Kind of, there is a CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw.tar.gz ( compare
> with CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw.xz )
>
>
> But again link is not good, and why put raw disk inside the tar?
This is how OracleCloud works, they are unable to consume a raw file
directly. I agree, its a bit odd.
> It would me more natural to have compressed image so one can do
> {z,bz,xc}cat cloud.raw.xz > /dev/lvm/vm-disk for example.
for the sake of size, lots of people prefer to download the qcow2c image
( note the compressed flag ), and qemu-img convert on their own end. Is
that an option for your usecase ?
>
> Official wiki link is broken regardless.
will try and get that fixed.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format
On 11/10/16 03:21, TE Dukes wrote: > Just a question, what exactly are these images? > > I see it mentioned on the CentOS website but not a lot of info on exactly > what it is and what it does. > > How does this differ from a CentOS 7 VM installed from an ISO? Are these > just pre-made images? these are images prebuilt to work in cloud infrastructure like openshift / amazon ec2 etc. they are pre-setup with cloud-init tools and are formatted in different backing filetypes. you can use them for local VM's as well, but you will just need to do a bit more work since there is no way to login to the images without exporting the metadata externally to setup passwords and keys etc. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline edit group
On 10/10/16 16:46, Alan Bartlett wrote: > In turn, I ask where the "more and more people" are actually > requesting edit access for that page? It certainly is not on this > mailing list. so far, its just been the guys who are working on the buildsystem behind it - a couple of other folks ( eg. from the SIGs ) who have asked I sent to the list, but going back does not look like anyone actually came through. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline edit group
hi guys, we've got more and more people who need edit rights to this page, at https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline - is it worth doing a ContainerEngGroup and make that group own this page instead of adding usernames to the page itself ? Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement
let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at > the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words, > where do I discuss this? > > I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment. > > -Jason > >> -Original Message- >> From: Karanbir Singh >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07 >> >> Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? >> >> Regards >> >> On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: >>> I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org >>>> [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org >>>> <mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org> ] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39 >>>> To: centos-docs@centos.org >>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 >>>> compliancestatement >>>> >>>> Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a >>>> CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? >>>> >>>> Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources >>>> >>>> -Jason >>>> >>>>> -Original Message- >>>>> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us <mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us> ] >>>>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 >>>>> To: 'centos-de...@centos.org' >>>>> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >>>>> >>>>> I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a >>>>> federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production. >>>>> >>>>> One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?" >>>>> >>>>> Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted? >>>>> >>>>> P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs >>>>> in https://git.centos.org/project/websites >>>>> <https://git.centos.org/project/websites> . >>>>> >>>>> -Jason >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>> - - >>>>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us >>>>> <http://www.pdinc.us> - >>>>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- >>>>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>>>> - - >>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> CentOS-docs mailing list >>>> CentOS-docs@centos.org >>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >>>> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs> >>>> >>> >>> ___ >>> CentOS-docs mailing list >>> CentOS-docs@centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >>> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Karanbir Singh >> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ <http://www.karan.org/> | >> twitter.com/kbsingh >> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc >> <http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc> >> ___ >> CentOS-docs mailing list >> CentOS-docs@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >> <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs> >> > > > ___ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -Original Message- >> From: centos-docs-boun...@centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39 >> To: centos-docs@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 >> compliancestatement >> >> Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a >> CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? >> >> Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources >> >> -Jason >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us] >>> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 >>> To: 'centos-de...@centos.org' >>> Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >>> >>> I am working on getting Centos 7 approved for use at a >>> federal agency, RHEL is already approved for use in production. >>> >>> One of the blockers I hit is, "Does the vendor provide a VPAT?" >>> >>> Does the attached look right? Where should this be posted? >>> >>> P.S. where is the git repo for the website, I only see bugs >>> in https://git.centos.org/project/websites . >>> >>> -Jason >>> >>> -- >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> - - >>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- >>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>> - - >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> >> >> ___ >> CentOS-docs mailing list >> CentOS-docs@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >> > > ___ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] Updated Vagrant Box's are now available : 1607
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Updated Vagrant box's are now available for CentOS Linux 7 and CentOS Linux 6 for x86_64. These are available for the Libvirt and the VirtualBox providers in Vagrant. ref: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/6 https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/7 Release Notes for these images are published at : https://seven.centos.org/2016/08/updated-centos-vagrant-images-available - -v1607-01/ We are doing all of our work, including build scripts and build content for these Vagrant Box's as a part of the CentOS Cloud Instance SIG. And host the content for contribution and participation at https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build/tree/master/vagrant - - I would like to invite everyone to come join us and help extend the scope of this work, as well as improve the current results. regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXqvdGAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtw+sH/2OSI2BJtd4/+lTnpJulQFhM ogE+dpfHgKvgVpUSm6PPjtmEVjP2x4OC/pALTRiBkQpgk7Mi7DNt9K8qjD7ClDxk WO/U5rkRTAvIZVFZ5BhXvrN1RzDArxSGdj5oSBnUzKWmc9wGvuX9Rz82FiC173KW 4Am9JeIlrYC5rsFzUqvijyaCG/8MweO6E242/FjfRWe+WTLX59OuVXzuRFVIpcvj p5WMolJ+j3BzqPYOUWIB8nqaFq+NQ7oHdxo/N/94gSxleT/5uHS+KXLyWeVhhHZE UgaAztSB/0r/mFmIkHa2ISqtASMGodTVicPKDfF96+5WldRhXLRVCNYtx4+AZLM= =oBhE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] rss centos.announce outdated
On 03/08/16 05:36, Ing. Adrian Hernández Yeja wrote: > Hi folks, I usually use the RSS feed > http://rss.gmane.org/messages/complete/gmane.linux.centos.announce to know > the centos updates but recently is outdated. Is this temporary? Is there > another source? > we should be able to run a rss feed locally for content going into the repo, it might need a bit of work to map back to the announcement emails though. what is the real workflow you are looking at for this ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation on CBS
On 12/07/16 03:03, Karsten Wade wrote: > Brian & I are doing some work on the SIG Guide this week, we can make > it an action to have it [[Include()]] the above content in to the SIG > Guide so that there is one location to reference, update, edit, and > translate. The SIGGuide is long over due, lets get that done. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] .NET on Centos.
Hi, On 28/06/16 18:17, Peter Q. wrote: > Hi there, I was reading about it. > https://www.redhat.com/en/about/blog/net-core-now-available-and-supported-red-hat-enterprise-linux-and-red-hat-openshift > > What will happen with Centos and .NET? > In the side of security and stability. Great question! On the CentOS side, we are working with both the upstreams ( RedHat and Microsoft in this case ) to make sure we get deliver the content, in the various formats, easily and everywhere. And I'm keen to make sure we are able to do this in a way that the upstream developers of the code know and understand the delivery mechanics for this. This including actually looking at onboarding the dotnet-core on Linux team into a SIG and then setting up build, test, release, lifecycle loops from the CentOS Project infra directly. On the downstream product side, once the content is available we will work through the build machanics and take it from there. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] [DISCUSS] Wiki page for centos atomic registry
On 21/06/16 23:44, Jason Brooks wrote: >> I am not decided as to where in the wiki (location) of the proposed page >> will be, and am there looking out for suggestions. > > We could put it under: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic Maybe https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos might be a good place, since its essentially a howto get started with the registry. Would that work for everyone ? regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [DISCUSS] Wiki page for centos atomic registry
On 20/06/16 14:13, Mohammed Ahmed wrote: > I think that should be for the container pipeline itself, not atomic > registry. Correct me if I am wrong. > Also, I should probably consider requesting write access to the > container pipeline page as well at > some point. yes, I agree. The Atomic registry has nothing to do with the container pipeline, so the two should not be confused into the same namespace. we should document howto use the registry in the same way as we do howto's for apps etc. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] Updated Vagrant Box's are now available : 1605
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Updated Vagrant box's are now available for CentOS Linux 7/x86_64 and for the first time for CentOS Linux 6/x86_64; We are providing box's for Livbirt provider and the Virtual Box provider. ref: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/6 https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/boxes/7 Release Notes for these images are published at : https://seven.centos.org/2016/06/updated-centos-vagrant-images-available / regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXYro+AAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtD0wH/258qtXogCXBwFDOId4d7PmV bRVyYp+i0wX+yG6xWrziDXjWoRB/xa+YUJX39qvhP2PGikJg7aj9K+z5DS9Y9Dfp hBMfmQ17MvIV53cfPeNnL06wSOZ+Y93awN7fr7It8nR4imAgXXouAX0YjDioOP2j GTteuu0ieyYU87sG/CZuHBGPgvsL4u5XVba19VY+0b12pv3z9kHJeHIwReQX3WVT 7C2cstXTsnEC/BYdbfPj+hFKRZGwuAiA5JDLN53eoOuQReIfnYfU2a/ugebTUH8G X12J64IaKDfCd6018DC+uUDtmaiFwXlxeaKyHqXO7m6EiCMQrhRty2CPNajVk08= =wR1K -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 114, Issue 3
On 19/05/16 05:46, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > You should now be able to edit that /Books page with your wiki username > PacktPublishing. Surely this is a mistake - we used to need real people's real names for the wiki ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] Machine-readble cloud-image list
On 18/04/16 18:36, Barak Korren wrote: > Hi there, I would like to write a script to download the CentOS > generic cloud images with the intention of making them eventually > available to oVirt users via the oVirt public Glance repository. > > For that purpose I need to: > 1. list the CentOS generic cloud images > 2. list mirrors from where I could potentially download those images > > I could try to parse the HTML here [1], but I'd rather just get the > lists from somewhere in some machine readble format if possible. > > So is this information or parts of it available in some > machine-readable format somewhere? > > [1]: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ > > Thanks, > Barak > in the early days I had a json file that had the details in there, but it was dropped almost a year ago. If you file a requst at bugs.centos.org and point me at it ( ideally assign the issue to me ), I can work out the required bits. What sort of info would you expect to see in this beyond - filename - date of last upates - centos ver - arch - file format - sha256um regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html > that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that might be ? regards - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFOdwAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtbnEH/01QLHrK59zUEiOuBCpDIXtX 1R6NwHp+9wDait8fx1nCydtZN+FSaXLeiOZC1JG+cT8ItOOj5c5iD6pIxp2FJkg1 psBl/Ym6MMJkhTH3ZlRdy6+jsJANy04lfQz4mdkcYqMI6x9++pfoCHLEajatZlPm Aq9CbUtvxvb8Vu3vnhdYbS5JvqTN2InIoGh62BJRuPVApMMkQgS1eQOfBnBk34dT 4zJT2t9afMHlr29s5gqWa8jh/LAx7BuNJu64m6k4wraku9sIqb4WlGDCK9Chq3zQ 5zbEHviYRF6N+DEfjsqEN+xxbrvanjEG140TXxmnplNdbLORFL7KsJg4P/U49js= =hGM4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 13:34, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor expertise to partake in > such a project. is there someone else on here who can help ? I think if we can demonstrate some traction, it would go a long way in both the upstream engagement and the conversation with Red Hat - since we can then demonstrate a communal win. > Since Mr. Hughes had already gotten earlier versions of chromium > to build under CentOS 6 (c.f. > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/), and he indicated it > was merely a matter of getting RHEL to give permission for him to > redistribute it more "formally" to the community, I was hoping > progress had been made with that. Johnny, can you perhaps quantify the effort a bit ? And if you need help what sort of help you might need for this ? I suspect a large part of that is just going to be time in day. > Have you, as the CentOS project lead ever asked RedHat if they can > make their version of Chromium for CentOS 6 available for us? If > not, can you please? I havent, but am more than willing to take the question up. regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFNjCAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtUMEH/2Mfo+5+hx4cfD9FvVg6nHQQ m+tbd1Ku/ytstZNhNJpHx95HoeJVfdC71y+6SylLWxxJ+1ridbaZ5t7dC1qEL5Rt hJEG1rIhJNTs4W1eIO4XeEQVzwOjzcsLwtNlTWypd6PVp8RVJqjOFk6ohN/gK3VW hLIoli+hwOdUxY81cbSqVJ+DJjvmBUupiZJqFlsRsutFd/LUL0MsOuexhqTeawIu G6qT/xudeq/eBU4TqPvnpO5NgKHjePTQEuDYmnmjG1F5xrw38HYeg6i3a8Fmv5wc NKuXZy4S8D96EBfm/R9g/RBm7umojXwz7MLkRHd3bq+GLHpa10Onb883XOxDqrU= =UErC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 13:14, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Please answer the original question (again) CentOS folks. > > Where are we with getting the RHEL version of Chromium available > for CentOS? > > There should be no technical reason why we can't get a working, up > to date, and therefore secure version of chromium running on CentOS > 6.7!! Happy to host it, is this something you are working on at the moment Matthew ? Regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFNIDAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtQQ8IAJ25uWYPsJB0nkTsJu7xX5Ep PlzFbzH3mObvgQ1pN8e5OjHycsLDlv+R2Y1mOl3uY3dbBQ9PQ9QmzkugK7fvVj6t fGVdpCA9sWL3xy8wgOlgPZ24sRodrJ82GTANmwrCxGFEHMCIUQ8szA0YS6cnwPbW sshWA3dHV3/KurlyPeecsTT4MqnM0em3pMZkn2Lk0zW3oaboZyD/9ljCEp3th1lV e+aZwCw1P+DGZHL88CoaQFXPu7BZ+iKAK6JE/6u6Qx4UYh4HMt+9Kx0prwWTjDHK X6qTr3UlcP+pGStNTIgb5A59wLGM+EbhtLZMoo9ozXH1Qszc+bkhanLmY/xV3Tc= =qjV7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] *correction* Notification of outage : mirrorlist.centos.org (ipv4) 2016-04-16 08:58 UTC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Apologies for this, the correct date should be : 2016-04-16 Sat. The timestamps remain accurate. On 16/04/16 10:09, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > At 05:00 UTC 2016-05-16 an automated component update caused the > mirrorlist service for CentOS to go down for all IPv4 based > services. The IPv6 service for mirrorlist.centos.org was > unaffected. > > By 08:11 UTC 2016-05-16 I rolled back the impacted components, > disabled the update mechanics, and restarted services. > > By 08:15 UTC 2016-05-16 Services were returning to normal. > > By 08:23 UTC 2016-05-16 we had multiple confirmations from around > the world that services were restored. > > --- system wide followup: > > - We will work to extend and add where needed, better testing > around each component involved in such roles. > > - I will work with Fabian and make sure that all our automated > component and system changes that impact a production service are > only run during regular working hours for the team. > > --- root cause: > > all the components involved in the downtime are backed up and we > will start looking at the root cause of why services went down, for > now the immediate focus was to restore services which was done by a > rollback. > > --- reporting issues: > > Note that for real time, time sensitive issues always drop into > #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net and let us know, along with > filing a bug report at bugs.centos.org - For any non time critical > issues, please report them at bugs.centos.org against the > 'Infrastructure' project, and we will aim to address them as soon > as possible. > - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXErmsAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtJdgIAI1+4KTYCdI4O+kFlrJ5IlMy TwFGYt7O1WyGDfXC27VLehDxNP0lFiZOd1TMMSWy0/P64TYcBr5GLa4Vc7WLpLef ywgjvgNE9VY69z4D1Lkgdxlgnhg31tPtW8kA1Py24nKrEFMYYi7/2tUGZn43kE8D SRn0CywFizCFIScB0xI7uSJRE2PzFFwixIG4LaEdqppxcId6hsKb80hzpIP35pPU eXlagl5CMad2XD0aVqKrqoU5W9vS9swKv9rc6ASsUHB28W7KcT0mq0YsIojhS81L w8hiSsTpW3b62uBb55MIvkg1Y11H0qlkW306ZaZAXjTpRsvNaz82+qRmgcVVJvc= =Uvpc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Notification of outage : mirrorlist.centos.org (ipv4) 2016-05-16 08:58 UTC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, At 05:00 UTC 2016-05-16 an automated component update caused the mirrorlist service for CentOS to go down for all IPv4 based services. The IPv6 service for mirrorlist.centos.org was unaffected. By 08:11 UTC 2016-05-16 I rolled back the impacted components, disabled the update mechanics, and restarted services. By 08:15 UTC 2016-05-16 Services were returning to normal. By 08:23 UTC 2016-05-16 we had multiple confirmations from around the world that services were restored. - --- system wide followup: - - We will work to extend and add where needed, better testing around each component involved in such roles. - - I will work with Fabian and make sure that all our automated component and system changes that impact a production service are only run during regular working hours for the team. - --- root cause: all the components involved in the downtime are backed up and we will start looking at the root cause of why services went down, for now the immediate focus was to restore services which was done by a rollback. - --- reporting issues: Note that for real time, time sensitive issues always drop into #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net and let us know, along with filing a bug report at bugs.centos.org - For any non time critical issues, please report them at bugs.centos.org against the 'Infrastructure' project, and we will aim to address them as soon as possible. - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXEgFAAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtHQoIAKBsD6xIlBCfuqRcx0AHto2g dwB7Pl5ijwVkqsIMpDNq4a3aws72P1PTwqi19PbnkwACh0kPxx8iT8/8RL4LLvmC dahoMjYrIpZYULij6u0QEy9RM9HZ7Xyo6lGe41+Rz1yFMv+QgqjhYBtt+EuvBrO1 ILM1PsQypXsxQaGKRMnhzjcIWXhpNNBinRAVEOmzLiHU2WYDefUwlB1gtHx5JmZl l/vWLSlMWRiC5HaDtKGBV5rPickqBrRkFfvGdYezrj3KHsoj8NCUhdir75gd6RXN b++FRAuRZZGcvCYquvwbrG2V+Ix1GG8GQBs2ej3p4wvaw9G5gBCR2hEa6ZINrQ8= =ZdAB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-docs] CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 112, Issue 8
On 17/03/16 13:09, Ben Hosmer wrote: >>Your CentOS Wiki home page [1] was created for you over three years >>ago (2013-02-26 21:03:39) and you last edited it the next day >>(2013-02-27 11:19:12). > >>I am unsure as to what you believe you need to do. <Puzzled!> > >>Alan. > > I'm sorry about that, I forgot I had it already! > > I was somewhat confused because despite logging in at > accounts.centos.org <http://accounts.centos.org> I was presented with > another login at wiki.centos.org <http://wiki.centos.org>. accounts.centos.org is only mapped to cbs.centos.org at this point, so you still need a login at bugs.centos.org / wiki.centos.org / ci.centos.org etc, we will gradually roll all the services into one central auth. > Additionally, the link to the wiki from accounts.centos.org > <http://accounts.centos.org> seems to be > broken: http://wiki.centos.org/wiki/ that should be fixable, maybe Fabian or Brian can comment on that bit -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 Rolling media March 2016
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am pleased to announce general availability of the March 2016 snapshot for CentOS Linux. This release includes CentOS Linux 7 iso based install media, Generic Cloud images, Atomic Host, Docker containers, Vagrant images, vendor hosted cloud images. This release set is tag'd 1603 and includes all updates released upto the 31st of March 2016. CentOS Linux rolling builds are point in time snapshot media rebuild from original release time, to include all updates pushed to mirror.centos.org's repositories. This includes all security, bugfix, enhancement and general updates for CentOS Linux. Machines installed from this media will have all these updates pre-included and will look no different when compared with machines installed with older media that have been yum updated to the same point in time. All rpm/yum repos remain on mirror.centos.org with no changes in either layout or content. - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 install media is available at http://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64/ File: CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1603-02.iso Sha: 58ee68c3ffae5c4ca629be9b992f97d108165e09726d3e8f80798ac9c7a1821e File: CentOS-7-x86_64-Everything-1603-02.iso Sha: f618b51bbbfbbc5a1d2fe64cb699735057f79df41125bad5be6eef11b4f7c575 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1603-02.iso Sha: f78dcd1040afcdbb716c0581a182365ff34b7b37e9c20aa40b521b3c42677744 - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Cloud Images are available at : http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ Sha: c88230cde563ca29b065d53819586262f79a64769736e014bf6dabaa61a20968 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1603.qcow2 Sha:6d17808cf208bee3243f51b84e9bfb10b06f0cd04e2930505d9ea4fba2583bc5 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1603.qcow2c Sha: f91e602120a728f144da605baf0d5f4ad59293921bee99cc4aa3a1ab65e6d445 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1603.qcow2.xz Sha:5c5cacfc1f0700cc7d48d667933cd730f7443e866caeda94d8e205a8bc8ce511 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1603.raw.tar.gz - CentOS Atomic Host is being release announced shortly. - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Vagrant images are updated at https://atlas.hashicorp.com/centos/7 and the backing files can be downloaded for libvirt and virtualbox providers at : Libvirt: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/vagrant/x86_64/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-V agrant-1603_01.LibVirt.box Sha: 4e01796e1afdd8c4bfbe98cffe5966caee227629429657a06c56d93d6e5fadaf Virtualbox: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/vagrant/x86_64/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-V agrant-1603_01.VirtualBox.box Sha: 549542fb475a02b7477000dded6dc7d12e7e325e461f029d25831eb9bb208a4b - CentOS Linux 5 / 6 and 7 docker images are updated at https://hub.docker.com/_/centos/ - We welcome all feedback around these rolling builds and media updates at the centos-devel mailing list ( http://lists.centos.org/ ). enjoy! - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXBbWDAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtkhQIAKWdQsR+3toahhrc/859kfXW Y3tyvRVU3t/i7i4bs+4jtwT4zih8rEP4DBNYQE/lkv7gusjWANiuvr9FtTrNCj5c 7mGhTOFQtNG7AqGEHfQLKcdkCM4LMUbINhOhAqzymX9Vvj/jznyqenBNBlbwj9Cc yQR0aEeGPKFLhzUQqBBBW7B8UT1GzEr6l3+d+V7zEXdUJkSVaCiM2rMBEdEK41P/ 1sYCcuodBPaTGFVEFPSPZf5sq/fMWQasKfx164xu0Sdi0QQUer7CzwRMlDev649x yXbzF4Fkhs89JomXM6js19IArjA+HSAOWFu+jiHyp14OFGjReEkEfOcm+swIJ9g= =Ob+s -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Notice of Service Outage and followup LON1/UK Facility
On 02/04/16 17:07, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:25 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> On Wednesday February 24th, at 6pm UTC time, the DC hosting some of >> the CentOS equipments used for various roles had suffered from >> multiple electricity power outages. The facility was completely dark >> for just under 2 hrs, and we were able to start recovering services by >> 8pm UTC. By midnight we had most services restored, by 2:00AM UTC Feb >> 25th we had all services restored. > > No emergency diesel generators ? I believe the second fail-back operation is what caused most of the issues, this was failing back from the backup source to the mains once they were live again. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Notice of Service Outage and followup LON1/UK Facility
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 == What happened == On Wednesday February 24th, at 6pm UTC time, the DC hosting some of the CentOS equipments used for various roles had suffered from multiple electricity power outages. The facility was completely dark for just under 2 hrs, and we were able to start recovering services by 8pm UTC. By midnight we had most services restored, by 2:00AM UTC Feb 25th we had all services restored. That meant that the machines in those racks were running on batteries (ups in the racks) but finally went down in an uncontrolled way due to lack ot communication with that UPS. Subsequent on Monday March 14th, we suffered another power outage in the racks, this time due to a overload on the rack power circuits. == Services that were impacted == - severity critical : mirrorlist.centos.org node (IPv6) went down (while multiple mirrorlist.centos.org nodes for IPv4 nodes were still online). That means that machines with only IPV6 connectivity couldn't get yum to work to retrieve the list of nearest mirrors. - severity medium : Our main buildservices queue management services were down; note: this did not impact our ability to build, test and deliver updates. - severity medium : www.centos.org and www.centos.org/forums weren't reachable through IPv6 : at the moment, those services are natively reachable through IPv4, but proxied through nodes in that DC for IPv6 users. Most tested browsers were falling back to IPv4 during that period - severity medium : CentOS DevCloud (https://wiki.centos.org/DevCloud) : that means that CentOS Developers weren't able to instantiate new CentOS test VMs for their work, but also weren't able to reach the existing ones. - severity low : several publicly facing small services like http://planet.centos.org , http://seven.centos.org (not critical and could be restored quickly to other VMs elsewhere) - severity low : the server leading the armv7hl builds for the Plague build farm was also offline, meaning no armhfp build during that timeframe (but not updates were to be built, so mitigated issue) = Followup actions and notes Over the years, the baseline recovery model we've used and tried to enforce is one of 'restore in place', take a downtime hit if needed - and ensure we have service continuity for the user facing components ( the mirrorlist service, the centos update and content distribution services). For other resources, like the main website etc, we ensure there are good backups available in multiple places, usable to restore services should there be a need. This model has worked well for us over the years, and we've had very little, if any, service outages that had a user impact. The restore in place/restore outside HA also meant we were able to better utilise the exclusively sponsored machines we rely on. However, as the project grows, with a lot more infrastructure being consolidated into a few locations for non CDN services, our exposure to service downtime has dramatically increased. Its clear that we need to expand the scope of where we backup to, how we backup, how we anticipate failure and our ability to restore services in a timely manner should there be facilities outages. In the coming weeks, we are going to undertake a deep dive into our Infrastructure design and delivery and try to first come up with a consolidated set of risks we need to manage against, and then work towards reducing the risk, spreading the availability as needed. Our backend storage platform for the DevCloud and persistent storage for other nodes in the facility is run from a distributed, replicated Gluster setup. Inspite of the sudden loss of power, in a production environment with hundreds of running VMs and dozens of running data jobs, we were able to trivially recover our entire data set with minimum data loss. Some of the running VMs inside the DevCloud did see local filesystem issues, but we dont think that was a backing storage issue. This event has dramatically increased out confidence in the gluster technology stack and we will certainly be looking at extending deployments for it internally. == Comments about hosting facility == Their Status post about this http://status.uk2.net/2016/02/24/london-power-outage/ We have multiple racks at this facility, and have a long standing relationship with them going back to late Summer 2012. Over this period we have had a near perfect uptime record for our equipment there. And above all we have been consistently impressed with the speed of and the knowledgeable support we've recieved at the DC. In many cases, how the facility reacts to outage defines the real service value - and in this case, we can only commend the fantastic support we had through the outage hours. We do however feel there could be better monitoring and reporting of some of the facilities information and will be working with them to improve in those regards. Fabian Arrotin and Karanbir Singh The CentOS Project
Re: [CentOS-virt] cloud-init issue w/ GenericCloud image
On 30/03/16 03:46, Tom Sorensen wrote: > I'm using the C7.2 GenericCloud image with KVM and am trying to inject > my own ssh key by adding it to /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d: > Have you considered using a Config Drive instead ? That way you can actually do whatever contexutalisation you need. Here is an example you can likely clone and extend: https://github.com/kbsingh/atomic-ci/blob/master/tests/z_0-genConfigDrive/1-genConfigDrive.sh You would then just need to boot the instance with this config drive .iso attached as the cdrom to the machine, which should also just be scriptable. Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format
On 22/03/16 01:06, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > On 21 March 2016 at 11:51, Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org> wrote: > >> On 21/03/16 14:34, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: >>> What is the point to pack single raw file into the tar.gz and to name it >> raw ? >>> Or it's just a mistake ? >>> >>> >> >> Johnny is looking at the cdn side of thigs, but effectively we will not >> have a .raw - we will have a .raw.tar.gz file ( which will itself only >> have a .raw file compressed inside it ) >> >> >> -- >> Karanbir Singh >> +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh >> GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc >> >> > Why not a compressed qcow2? > > Like: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.qcow2c > > This way, we can add it as-is to OpenStack Glance, that it will be > downloaded by demand, when required and, OpenStack Nova will automatically > uncompress the image for runtime. We do publish a qcow2c, the always updated version ( updated each month end ) is at : http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.qcow2c This is a symlink that points to the latest image. At the moment this is : http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1602.qcow2c There will be a 1603 by the end of this week -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation
On 22/03/16 10:02, François Cami wrote: > With that said, provided we find a way to mention how to mention that > unambiguously, I'm ok with it. the way to do this is to self host the content, with relevant disclaimers and an effecient/functional process to edit and remove content not relevant. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] status of https://wiki.centos.org/Documentation
On 22/03/16 07:30, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > Hi, > > I was having a look at that page, and was wondering what we can do for > point #3 (Manuals and other documentation) > As we have no real content for CentOS 6 and 7 , my idea was just to > explain in one line that (while technically not the CentOS > documentation) , almost all the points coming from uptream documentation > ( - except for subscription manager - ) can be applied to CentOS and so > having link from that section to https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/ > > Ideas, thoughts, comments ? > -1 from me, CentOS scope isnt the same as RHEL ones. if we cant get the docs and host / adapt to taste, I am ok for us to move the existing docs into an archive/ area, but retain it on the site, along with the relevant content redirection as needed, and just drop having current release docs. if none is willing to do the work to make centos docs possible, clearly the community has rejected having these docs in the first place. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud.raw very unusual format
On 21/03/16 14:34, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: > What is the point to pack single raw file into the tar.gz and to name it raw ? > Or it's just a mistake ? > > Johnny is looking at the cdn side of thigs, but effectively we will not have a .raw - we will have a .raw.tar.gz file ( which will itself only have a .raw file compressed inside it ) -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki addition for AWS
On 08/03/16 18:46, Warren Turkal wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org > <mailto:mail-li...@karan.org>> wrote: > > I'm also working on making the CentOS images available outside of the > Market Place shortly, so details for that ( including regions ) will > likely end up in the same page. > > > Since you mentioned getting info about AMI ids, do you know anything > about the following? > > Why do the AMIs listed in the region specific images for CentOS7 in > eu-central-1 not exist in the following query: > $ aws --region eu-central-1 ec2 describe-images --owners aws-marketplace > --filters Name=product-code,Values=aw0evgkw8e5c1q413zgy5pjce --query > 'Images[*].ImageId' > ami-7cc4f661ami-9bf712f4ami-e68f82fb > > In fact, I cant even find them with the following queries: > $ aws --region eu-central-1 ec2 describe-images --image-ids ami-08222e15 > # CentOS7 > $ aws --region eu-central-1 ec2 describe-images --image-ids ami-0e222e13 > # CentOS6 > > Are those image private or just gone? > > If those images aren't correct anymore, we should just delete that whole > section from the wiki. let me check with the AMP folks - they manage the actual backing image from their end. would be nice if there was a way to querry the status, and print that directly in the wiki -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-virt] status for centos-release-docker and docker packages
On 03/03/16 16:23, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at > https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker > > Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: > docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 > atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 > docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 > > I think I need to have the docker testing packages available on > buildlogs.c.o. That's probably a task for kb, arrfab? Let me look through the bits and see where we are and get this process started up. We'd need to get some basic testing done, and then we can promote it a bit. is the docker-1.10 stack completely in-place replacement/upgrade from the existing distro hosted docker ( 1.8.2 ? ) regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] RasPi 3.x and RH-based Distro (Slightly OT)
On 29/02/16 17:59, Benjamin Smith wrote: > With the release of the Rasberry Pi 3.x, I think we have a platform I could > jump on board with. Performance has just been lacking until now! > > But I really don't want to jump the "RH ship" - I'd rather stick with an > environment I am comfortable in. > > Can anybody comment here on the best way to run RHEL/Fedora/CentOS on a > RasPi, > or if there's even a useful port? https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/Arm32/RaspberryPi3 Just put that up, the baseline stuff all works out of the box, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Pi 2 Alternatives
On 04/02/16 15:33, Chris Olson wrote: > It would be better if there were choices that include a standard > Linux distribution such as CentOS. > well, you can certainly run CentOS on a rpi2, and there are some other options as well. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/Arm32 for more info -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RasPi 3.x and RH-based Distro (Slightly OT)
On 29/02/16 20:00, David Both wrote: > +1 > > I just today installed CentOS Userland on a Raspberry Pi 2B and have > started using it as a firewall. It is fast and really works perfectly > for this use case. I have an HDMI to VGA adapter and a PS/2 > mouse/keyboard to USB adapter to connect to my 16 port KVM switch. I use > a Gb Ethernet dongle for the internal network and connect the on-board > NIC to the external network. great! I've mostly just stuck with the ttl cable, with serial console and use the cubietruck and the rpi2 as headless devices. > > I have a few more tools I want to install, because the CentOS ARM image > is very minimal. And not everything I would like is available on the > repo, but enough to make this very workable for me. you should be vocal on the arm-dev list, we are looking at ways of doing an epel mass build as well for the altarch distro's. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RasPi 3.x and RH-based Distro (Slightly OT)
On 29/02/16 17:59, Benjamin Smith wrote: > With the release of the Rasberry Pi 3.x, I think we have a platform I could > jump on board with. Performance has just been lacking until now! > > But I really don't want to jump the "RH ship" - I'd rather stick with an > environment I am comfortable in. > > Can anybody comment here on the best way to run RHEL/Fedora/CentOS on a > RasPi, > or if there's even a useful port? join the arm-dev list ( https://lists.centos.org ) CentOS has a great story across the entire ARMv7 and v8 platform, with every major vendor in the ARM 64bit platform working with us. We say the rpi3 release this morning and are going to work on a bringup to match our rpi2 images. However, we will also be doing a 64bit image, based on CentOS Linux 7/aarch64 release regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-virt] installing xen on c7
On 27/02/16 12:52, Yamaban wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:20, Scot P. Floess wrote: >> >> Hit the send key before actually typing anything :( >> >> Was going to say - ah OK didn't understand your original question. >> I'm not entirely sure - I just followed directions :) However, you >> ask a reasonable question. >> >> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >>> On 27/02/16 01:41, Scot P. Floess wrote: >>> > > From George's original email, I had to: >>> > >* Install centos-release-xen from centos-extras >>> > > Then a yum update followed by a yum install xen. >>> > > That worked for me... >>> > >>> i had to do something similar, but my question is - one cant run xen >>> without the kernel, so why not have the xen package require the xen >>> kernel as a prereq ? > > IMHO, the best way to solve this would a additional line in the spec-file: > "Provide: kernel-dom0" for those kernel that are provide this > functionality. > > Then the xen-packages could "Require: kernel-dom0" > no matter which way the kernel functionality came to be. > > Maybe ask even across distros for such a implemention, > to get a more coherent experience for xen. yeah, the CentOS-5 and 6 Xen stacks already do something similar - which is why I was expecting the CentOS 7 one to do that as well. Let me work this with George and see where he thinks. Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS] power management / tuned following external power source
hi, twice in the last week I've been caught out where the laptop was running tuned with 'throughput-performance' profile on the work table, and I walked away, carried on working - and had the battery run flat in just over an hour. Compare this with tuned running the 'powersave' profile - will usually take the battery through to 3hrs+ - and if i just totally turn down the cpu's in the powersave mode, I can get 5 hrs+ on the x1 carbon gen2 laptop I've got. So what I am wondering is if there is an easy way to have the tuned-adm reset profiles based on external power source. If I'm at the work table and plugged in, run with throughput-performance mode, and if the external power is disconnected, run in powersave mode ? I've had, admittedly a brief, look and found nothing obvious. Has anyone else run into this before ? Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-virt] installing xen on c7
On 27/02/16 01:41, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > From George's original email, I had to: > > * Install centos-release-xen from centos-extras > > Then a yum update followed by a yum install xen. > > That worked for me... > i had to do something similar, but my question is - one cant run xen without the kernel, so why not have the xen package require the xen kernel as a prereq ? regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-virt] installing xen on c7
hi, I just noticed that yum install xen does not pull in the xen kernel on c7, is this by design ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 Rolling media Feb 2016
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am pleased to announce general availability of the Feb 2016 snapshot for CentOS Linux. This release includes CentOS Linux 7 iso based install media, Generic Cloud images, Atomic Host, Docker containers, Vagrant images, vendor hosted cloud images. This release set is tag'd 1602 CentOS Linux rolling builds are point in time snapshot media rebuild from original release time, to include all updates pushed to mirror.centos.org's repositories. This includes all security, bugfix, enhancement and general updates for CentOS Linux. Machines installed from this media will have all these updates pre-included and will look no different when compared with machines installed with older media that have been yum updated to the same point in time. All rpm/yum repos remain on mirror.centos.org with no changes in either layout or content. - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 install media is available at http://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64/ File: CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1602-01.iso Sha: 741a28e3d42c40ded2e42b83eda4d8d09137b36ceef584753b94abd298d4dfed File: CentOS-7-x86_64-Everything-1602-01.iso Sha: 6cc79d3f3183318d0089cb04dbfd97418ff009f6fb01bce4849289ede96df45d File: CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1602-01.iso Sha: 34120f3bc02e1edd6d5b19516876c8456a1300de4b98da79fb0a7d444d1df3d8 - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Cloud Images are available at : http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1602.qcow2 Sha: 1b777fa1ea2b2cf0be7ed6ecce54ef18ece5c6551fb291549b887e33b78d7c78 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1602.qcow2c Sha: bc0f51d9376001f8973595b71105b9d53c8c27b3e0969676aab2ab036cc4d835 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1602.qcow2.xz Sha: dd0f5e610e7c5ffacaca35ed7a78a19142a588f4543da77b61c1fb0d74400471 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1602.raw.tar.gz Sha: f4e679eef79af695bd8f2cb32d37fa93c7cb4644eb79f689bde6bd86100e4af5 - CentOS Atomic Host was released earlier, details for the release are available at : https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-February/014446.htm l - CentOS Linux 6 and 7 AMIs have been updated as well, as follows: CentOS Linux 6 : https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00NQAYLWO/ CentOS Linux 7 : https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ These images are also now enabled across all Amazon EC2 regions, and available on all HVM instance types. This includes the Amazon AWS free tier. - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Vagrant images are updated at https://vagrantcloud.com/centos/boxes/7 and the backing files can be downloaded for libvirt and virtualbox providers at : Libvirt: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/vagrant/x86_64/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-V agrant-1602_02.LibVirt.box Virtualbox: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/vagrant/x86_64/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-V agrant-1602_02.VirtualBox.box - CentOS Linux 5 / 6 and 7 docker images are updated at http://index.docker.io/_/centos - We welcome all feedback around these rolling builds and media updates at the centos-devel mailing list ( http://lists.centos.org/ ). enjoy! - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJW0O/fAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbt0KwH/RUBoINSas2fADErpw0HFJI+ 8QmRa5sH6X5vvBodWMT5qiulkof06IgX6psrniCzYejt88OP0XUjuA0lEh9MUq4a Ie7X5TnXIndH0eGU3UQIivXRojeSTdDjNmbdTQehxTN5WfA/tml29eppMBRt6xEi K56/Ml2FxdU/b1EkCBO68VWcZvAl6gxmtLJv38sFn2WxepDjyrHGF+A10sJqGYt6 V7E32iZqZDwkSmuWwHdf7T0NH9DE9TxcIH/IsRUnYAcwqLcGZm+WqFoD6KRafVAM e2KvLr/L9NwaU6C6rZVWJ1yHwBaYH87xNEGcr69mpR2HJQt3PrlkiTC4wXVKpRg= =015B -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] XSAs 170 and 154, repository layouts, and centos-release-xen 8-1
On 23/02/16 15:04, George Dunlap wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Sarah Newman <s...@prgmr.com> wrote: >> On 02/17/2016 04:30 AM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> I have the following packages going through the CBS: >>> * A CentOS 7 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 >>> * A CentOS 6 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 >>> * A CentOS 6 xen-4.4.3-11, with XSAs 170 >>> >>> All these should show up in mirrors hopefully sometime later today. >>> As usual, please report any problems here. >> >> Domains using the distribution provided pvgrub won't boot after upgrade. >> >> Old location of pvgrub: >> >> /usr/lib/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_32.gz >> /usr/lib/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_64.gz >> >> New location of pvgrub: >> >> /usr/lib64/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_32.gz >> /usr/lib64/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_64.gz > > FYI I've got a new version that provides symbolic links for backwards > compatibility which should have hit buildlogs (aka > centos-virt-xen-testing) two hours ago, but hasn't for some reason... can you check and let me know - I've looked at the pending queues a few minutes back and found nothing there. So anything due to buildlogs or cdn should be pushed already regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] XSAs 170 and 154, repository layouts, and centos-release-xen 8-1
On 18/02/16 13:57, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/17/2016 06:30 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > > > > For C6 users: > >> * If you want to update to xen-46, and also get further updates >> automatically: >> >> yum install centos-release-xen-46 > > Would this be instead (to get latest and always stay one latest): > > yum remove centos-release-xen44 centos-release-xen46 > yum install centos-release-xen you dont need that centos-release-xen anymore. once there is enough traction, the 'xen' repo itself will go away ( its a symlink right now, pointing to the latest xen-XX in each of the centos repos ) Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Asking to join CentOS virt-sig for oVirt
On 19/02/16 15:39, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Rafael Martins <rmart...@redhat.com > <mailto:rmart...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm Rafael Martins, from oVirt integration team, and I'd like to > join the CentOS virt-sig to help with oVirt packaging and maintenance. > > > Welcome aboard Rafael! Ack on my side for joining. > I'm not sure myself about the on-boarding procedure. > Karanbir (CC, not sure he's subscribed to this list too) is there > something I need to do for giving permissions to Rafael to build and tag > packages in ovirt / qemu tree? best thing to do for new folks is to come to the SIG meeting, and work through the process that way - also introduce yourself to the other folks in the SIG, so they have an idea on what you are looking to do and how they might help! Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] devtoolset-4
On 28/01/16 10:54, Kay Diederichs wrote: > Hi, > > is there any way to get access to devtoolset-4 ? > > I see alot of stuff at > http://cbs.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2076 . Is this not yet > released? > not as yet, the SCL Sig guys are working through the initial bootstrap, and should have it done soon - I would recommend dropping into the next SCL SIG meeting ( they are held on IRC in #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC on alternate Wednesdays ). https://www.centos.org/community/calendar/#Software_Collections_SIG_Sync-up regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 wireless config on command line on asus
On 04/02/16 21:29, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote: > Hi all, > I'm trying to configure wireless on my Asus laptop running CentOS7. > I see wlan0 when I type iw dev, but if I type > ip link set wlan0 up > I get the following error: > RTNETLINK answers: Operation not possible due to RF-kill > > Any idea what is wrong?? your laptop has a switch to turn on/ turn off the wifi - and its currently turned off. this might be a real switch, or a key combination. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-docs] Make Atomic Host Downloads more Visible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/12/15 08:28, Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote: > I believe we should list the Atomic Host downloads more clearly on > these pages: > > https://wiki.centos.org/Download https://www.centos.org/download/ > > I can make the edits if given permission or I am happy to just see > them done. > There is no plan for having SIG content on www.centos.org - so we wont be listing them there, but there were conversations on how best to have SIG downloads more visible on the wiki Download page ( which is the main download destination anyway ). It might be worth restarting that conversation. Atomic wasent listed there in the past, since we didnt have a stable GA release as such. - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWioQyAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbt3hoIALuP7NmEXudQq5+AVDD11YJ0 jSJZes8ohDIKJGNSLqRSdXBdjn7m0qsXXxgM4VZsu0KUz1mR2OE6NXlxLLzkIXN0 bk5+1kneFc6KBRU7xvSFyy63AayZRDuZSAW0wR0X8Pt9uPZk0O0RuLy2UF2qKNRA rNtVPJHiEmAyYgMLe2BzaxejRpBJR712ix+9mvFVw+ORc6bpULab3z/xuLHmU48S KWDS6T8M4S2fxWqK+lvFZTpBct1wx3xQ5Wx9djeeW4ROlKGH7Z/DJz0cHJ+U//iS lRJxtJcXMdzXuQ8r8HsIP+LhHFHOU3u+zthmEtCME48CN3iVCsYXf7Gk694yLqM= =HG/i -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Security Updates
On 18/12/15 09:34, Дмитрий Тесёлкин wrote: > > This makes me think that there will be no security updates for 1503 and the > only way to get them is to upgrade to 1511, but I'd like to find any proof. > Unfortunately, there is nothing about this in Release Notes :( > Thats right, there are no point release updates, you will also notice that older deprecated content will be removed from mirror.centos.org in a few weeks time. The way to work around surprises in large installation is to enable the CR/ repos on a select few testing machines - this will give you access, ahead of main release, to the content for the main release. Any update that is going to take more than a few days to get out, is released via CR/ repos first. Also, finding and reporting bugs during this process helps get rectification in before it becomes the default for the entire user base. Having said this, what exactly is the issue you are facing ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] "installation source" specification for netinstall
On 15/12/15 23:46, ken wrote: > On 12/15/2015 04:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 12/15/2015 12:29 PM, ken wrote: >>> Trying to specify the "installation source" in the configuration of >>> netinstall for centos 7 (7.1). Three places on the web said >>> >>> mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/ >>> >>> But that configuration page probes, then it says, "Error setting up >>> base repository". >>> >>> What's the magic needed? >>> >>> Also, if anyone knows specs for epel and others, they might help too. >> >> use one of the actual mirrors. >> http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/ > > Nope. No go. Switch to the VC's and see what the error message is in the logs. do you have networking setup at this point ? is it working as you'd expect ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 installer bug?
On 16/12/15 17:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > The other admin I work with seems to have found a bug in the installer. > The setup is: two internal SSD drives. Once the GUI gets to "select drive > to install on", he goes to , creates a RAID 1, and > partitions it, regular MBR (they're small). 1G for /boot as the first > partition, 2G for swap as the second partition, and the rest for / as > partition 3. fdisk shows the partition types correctly. > > Back to the GUI, select the MD drive... and /boot's fine, / looks ok... > but the one for swap shows with 0 bytes. > > Anyone else seen this behavior? this might be down to when anaconda does its disk scan, and when the parts were created by hand. Ideally, just use anaconda to do the same thing and you should be fine. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum/RPM and Trust on First Use
On 16/12/15 03:05, Alice Wonder wrote: > I'm not on the yum / RPM list and I don't know that I want to join just > to discuss this but with respect GPG keys - it is a classic example of > trust on first use. > > The first time yum installs a package, it asks to import the GPG key > used to sign the packages. Most people accept without validating the key. > This is a huge issue, its something we've debated many times and I dont think there is a clear answer, yet. At this point we have yum use the gpg keys setup at install time, from the install media - it should not be going over the wire to grab keys. And we sign the install media, and its sha sum's - so uses can verify things. the underlaying thinking being that if the install media is compromised, anything it does and any content it grabs over the wire should be considered potentially compromised - so enforce the idea of media test, media validation, and deliver the first ring of trust via the media. Having said that, your point about using DNS as a second way to verify the keys is a good one, I believe its come up in the past as well. And we have a todo item to get dnssec up for centos.org in the near future. what I would recommend, is to open an issue report at bugs.centos.org/ to track this as a task. As a related subject, we do push the main key fingerprints via https at www.centos.org/keys regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS AltArch 7 (1511) on x86_64
delivered for this architecture. The images shipped are ready to run and are board specific. While there is plenty of desktop and X related support available, our focus for these builds has been towards the server and IoT roles. We have a dedicated mailing list for the ARM ports ( both Armhfp and Aarch64 ) at https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev ; questions specific to these builds and images should be posted there. * CentOS-Userland-7-armv7hl-Minimal-1511-BananaPi.img.xz sha256sum : d461144b471434a275268e85828def38c09e265da24b71d2f10771d264532368 direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/armhfp/CentOS-Userland-7-armv7hl-Minimal-1511-BananaPi.img.xz * CentOS-Userland-7-armv7hl-Minimal-1511-CubieTruck.img.xz sha256sum : 17c3944429ac323c636ee955062d8177219f397fea4416dca87ca19092b646ec direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/armhfp/CentOS-Userland-7-armv7hl-Minimal-1511-CubieTruck.img.xz *CentOS-Userland-7-armv7hl-Minimal-1511-RaspberryPi2.img.xz sha256sum : 05e8c58cd837b90c0ab423b3730ee20ad185e19f346f531d3717c51358ea72cf direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/armhfp/CentOS-Userland-7-armv7hl-Minimal-1511-RaspberryPi2.img.xz CentOS AltArch 7 (1511) for PowerPC64 (TechPreview) : This architecture is for 64-bit IBM POWER7 machines using big endian byte ordering. We are marking this as a Tech Preview release, as it needs wider testing before it can be adopted as a GA release. SIG Notes: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/ppc64 * CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64-Everything-1511.iso sha256sum : 40ce665db62483a044a6d1a4996b2d5b507eb7f43c5e7846116dbd72e9e64e6a direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/ppc64/CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64-Everything-1511.iso * CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64-NetInstall-1511.iso sha256sum : 46715a965f98901fabed13076aba879c32dd51b7bab63fa035b61a5b051f0b04 direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/ppc64/CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64-NetInstall-1511.iso CentOS AltArch 7 (1511) for PowerPC8 LE (TechPreview) : This architecture is for 64-bit IBM POWER8 machines using little endian byte ordering. We are marking this as a Tech Preview release, as it needs wider testing before it can be adopted as a GA release. SIG Notes: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/ppc64le * CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64le-Everything-1511.iso sha256sum : 713ea707eea4eb75d7ff27648e6e3a4e97738bc3b2b274d1e9dc629fe537a170 direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/ppc64le/CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64le-Everything-1511.iso * CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64le-NetInstall-1511.iso sha256sum : fa7c5f504e56ad9115b820b1cf6650e6c20c6ca6224b155ef0c12e1be8e8f666 direct link : http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/ppc64le/CentOS-7-AltArch-ppc64le-NetInstall-1511.iso I'd like to thank everyone involved in this process. We have come a long way down the route from the initial plans of getting the AltArch project bootstrapped, and its only down to the dedciated efforts from the people involved in this process that we are able to deliver support for five new architectures. I also want to take this opportunity to point out that we run an office hours forum, twice a week. Details are available at https://www.centos.org/community/calendar/#Karanbir_Singh_Office_Hours , please feel free to stop by and say hi. We welcome comments and questions around pretty much anything / everything relevant to the CentOS community. enjoy! -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1511) on x86_64
by community driven help and guidance. The best place to start for new users is at http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp - -- Contributors This release was made possible due to the hard work of many people, foremost on that list are the Red Hat Engineers for producing a great distribution, without them CentOS Linux would look very different. We are also looking for people to get involved with the QA process in CentOS, if you would like to join this please introduce yourself on the centos-devel list (http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel ). - -- Thanks I would also like to thank our donors and sponsors for their continued support for the project. And to everyone who contributed with ideas, code, test feedback, and promoting CentOS Linux into the ecosystem. Enjoy! - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0094455 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWbtPVAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtuzoH/1zmoLQxPUMCzLhUVvtuBamQ rKg4orfcOIjYkENomQThpMUPLy2iX3CvnzcEKiUYIMOpiVQXfC+rAswT45ufHbnc 0RkCoqwKBDEr+c1hzP5F8AAhQ3Ea1h8SLbYT81UZlw3VRQZt1lQdam/9YzDQojtk s2kczqLZpnCWRIApv8QcDlAcuau05xqcfP/EVMNja2lBS4m57v9aAswZ1eSt7TQX XegCDbWht1iP+lQBfB6BFtTHEe3V2Tf0dxsNBXm4Kn0DOS6UIHVpDS69ZSkpmhve 6fHFGWYW9FUPP+/w5ShyUtCN4Cjtiy7FfFSXSBJMSDQqHVxtnMpK/C5ekOD+vKk= =bZjx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On 07/12/15 23:42, J Martin Rushton wrote: > So if we are to give up on the point release does that mean I don't > have to update my machines until CentOS 8 comes along? ;-) on the flip side, ignore the point in time, assume you run /7/ and need to update as you go along, with the YYmm telling you how far adrift you are... in workloads where there is no real update in place ( think cloud, container, atomic etc ), its the only reference you get to a single package set. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot
On 07/12/15 04:11, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> Always Learning wrote: >>> >>>> I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach >>>> to everything. >>> >>> Agreed. >>> But two possibly OT and probably ignorant queries: >>> >>> 1. I am running a standard Centos 32-bit system on my home servers. >>> I keep them up-to-date, but have not re-booted for several months. >>> I see from /etc/centos-release that I am running 7.1. >>> If I re-booted would this become 7.2? >>> >>> 2. If so, is this kernel panic a widespread phenomenon? >> >> You're running the 32-bit AltArch build of CentOS? >> >> The /etc/centos-release is owned by the centos-release package, and >> the contents will be updated when you update that pacakge. A reboot >> won't change that. In the default x86_64 release, I think that you'd >> need to pull updates from the CR repo to get the 7.2.1511 packages, >> still. > > And just look at the confusion -- because the website almost never > mentions 7.1.1053 or 7.2.1511, it can be really hard to understand > this discussion -- one person using "7.1" and "7.2" and the other > using "7.2.1511". Good thing the 2nd person didn't use "7 (1511)", > like the website does. Note that there is a /etc/centos-release-upstream as well that identifies what ver of the upstream we are currently tracking. > Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it. I hope its not that drastic! There are multiple issues and fallouts etc here, start from the fact that the point number isnt really much other than a datestamp, to who and how it gets used and for what purpose etc. But the thing that bothers me most is that the reason as to why we are doing this and how its implemented isnt clear to people on this thread. eg. when we were doing x.y, RHEL wasent. They were on a X release, and all the other point in time data was communicated outside of that scope ( eg in EL3 / 4 etc ). I believe being pragmatic around this, and delivering value into areas that needed it most is good thing for us and the userbase at large - however, if we are breaking systems for existing setup's then we should address that. I took onboard all the feedback from 7 release time and I believe the system we have in place now should work for most people ( no one has been able to demonstrate a problem space in the distro as such ). If the issue is around communication and how we export the metadata / mindset - I totally take on board that we've had serious issues in that space. Even the fact that there is a CR/ repo isnt something most people understand or even know about, its something we should fix. Greg's pointed out the website version reporting, and its a great point - however, note that we are already working on fixing that side of things by bringing all Download specific info into 1 place, and doing this on the wiki ( wiki.centos.org/Download ) - we are moving all version specific content away from the website; the net result being that the website becomes about the project, and the wiki becomes the defacto source for all things content ( linux distro, sig's content, user help etc ). This is also primarily driven by the fact that we've struggled to keep the site updated and relevant, whereas the wiki with its much larger user base and contributor base has far better churn. So lets workout what the tangible issues are, and then work on resolving those. I will end by saying that we have more than a few million monthly instances out there now, in container space, in cloud space, in developer instances - and all of those people have hugely benefited from the new visioning. I certainly dont want you to leave! regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot
On 07/12/15 13:03, Johnny Hughes wrote: > 2. The Alternative Arches (i686, armhpc, aarch64) are not necessarily > updated as quickly as the main arches. That is one of the reasons they > are AltArch and not a main arch. However, we are working hard on all of > those as well. power7 and 8 ( both BE and LE ) are pretty close as well -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large > enterprise environment. It is usually blocked. > Does google hangout work ? we might be able to also setup a phone dial in setup -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On 07/12/15 15:52, John Hodrien wrote: > To me, I'm not sure I get any issues or advantages from the new scheme, > but I > can't say it bothers me greatly. This is the thing that bothers me most - that folks dont have a good grasp on what / why the numbering is working like this. We are still a small team, and all efforts are flat out on getting the iso media and images done, out of the door - but as soon as I have this done, I'll look at hosting some google hangouts, irc sessions and maybe a longer email thread as well to lay out the numbering proposition. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot
On 03/12/15 13:58, Greg Bailey wrote: > Those who care about the upstream version knew that this was derived > from RHEL 7.0. Those who don't care about upstream versions but want to > track monthly rebuilds of cloud images, etc., could distinguish between > "1406" and (for example) "1407". But somewhere along the line for 7.1, > the "component that maps to the upstream release" was dropped, and we > got just 7 (1503). I don't recall seeing where or how that decision was > made; is there a link someone can provide to the relevant discussion in > centos-devel? i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot
On 03/12/15 16:47, Duncan Brown wrote: >> Did you rebuild initrd after removing the kmod packages? >> > Yes, and no change is it possible to get a bug report at bugs.centos.org with as much detail as possible, so we can try to reproduce ( and atleast document and manage it that way ). thanks -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot
On 03/12/15 10:39, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lind...@pbm.com>: >>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >>> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me. >> >> CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ... > > And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is? > > I mean, I'm used to the concept that CentOS used to say the > current version is 6.3 when RHEL 6.4 was released but hadn't > made it through the CentOS pipeline. > > But how am I supposed to figure out that CentOS 7.1503 < 7.2 ? If you look down the same wiki Download page, in the 'Base Distribution section' there is a CentOS release ver to RHEL release ver mapping, to indicate which version of the RHEL sources a specific CentOS build is derived from. 7(1503) : RHEL 7.1 7(1406) : RHEL 7.0 -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CR getting 7.2 packages......
On 02/12/15 21:29, Lamar Owen wrote: > Heads-up to everyone: CR is getting CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') > packages. just updated using CR, and, yeah, GNOME 3.14 is a bit > different from 3.8.. several things are in different places on the > screen. I did have to re-setup my triple monitor settings to have the > laptop's display in the center and the two other displays as one on the > left and one on the right. > > The good side is that nothing major seems to have broken. thats good to hear - there are quite a few rebases and a lot of new added functionality in the new release. In the coming weeks, I will try and visit some of these via blog posts, videos etc. If anything specific pop's up, let me know. regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 7.2 kernel panic on boot
On 03/12/15 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
> initramfs is missing...
> check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not
> do a "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should be ok !
You might want to also check there is enough diskspace for the initrd to
be built and hosted in the right place..
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Regional CentOS Specific Meetup groups
Hi, Just a quick post to say that I've setup a CentOS users group in the UK at http://www.meetup.com/CentOS-UK - aim to start organising regular demos and meetups face 2 face around the country. If you are based in the UK, I encourage you to come join the group. Also note that we have a CentOS group in India at http://www.meetup.com/CentOS-India/ and another group for the Netherlands at http://www.meetup.com/CentOS-Netherlands/ Regards and hope to see you at one of these meetups soon, -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-SCL python version
On 16/11/15 18:26, Noam Bernstein wrote: > Hi - I’d like to use the CentOS-SCL python27 packages, but those appear to be > rather out of date, still on 2.7.5. Is there any chance that there will be > an update in the 2.7 track, to 2.7.10? > > thanks, There are a few SCL's ready for release - you should see them come through in the coming week. This includes : py27 / py33 and py34; for py27 this would be to 2.7.8 -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Changing the centos name on boot
On 03/11/15 05:06, Ramaseshan S wrote: > Sorry didnt know that > Here is an attached online link. > > http://tinypic.com/r/33pdcw6/9 > just so i understand this - why are you trying to hide the fact that this is CentOS you are running there ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Release for qemu-kvm-ev from Virtualization SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of qemu-kvm-ev stack for CentOS Linux 7/x86_64. This release is delivered by the work done in the CentOS Virtualization Special Interest Group. In order to use this qemu-kvm version, on an updated CentOS Linux 7/x86_64 machine, you should run: yum install centos-release-qemu-ev yum install qemu-kvm-ev This will bring in all the dependencies needed, including the updated qemu-img tools. This stack is curated as a part of the CentOS Virtualization SIG. You can find more details about this group, including the technologies they are bring to CentOS at their page https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization . This group meetings every alternate Tuesday in #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net, details for the meetings can be found on their SIG pag e. We welcome participation in this group from anyone interested in virtualization and technologies associated with it. Feel free to drop into our list at https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt and say hi. Thanks to Sandro Bonazzola from the oVirt team for building and maintaining this qemu-kvm-ev stack. - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWKldBAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtb3gIAIIF7If9daApI0cZtRPCLNC+ fz6FPpWd/OyBOkyXHFtREp32voR16eq0EMowW8P+mLAB5YJ6iauMfv7vDTHJWAnw n3/x2MSHMsSiRCUUDnLAJHBqqJ4X1YUsNkbHE/f+Vb7AF9w2fuQE7BBUJsjGY5tQ 9V1SIkVSdzaYy2tps7Y6b9iHBk5zpMiWnFdMKfW/QTSoLp9wpi+0jlwx7aebHRAK y1tEIljDEgwSF85IkGkNtah1LGjhiB1J4aseewjKw2azsQ1z41fh4MFnujvPXSbj 40aJoRDcLvtXtaHB5dMMXOeMFkaki4iJxH5GV3H32sGfrLm+7ZuH3n397rfuAvk= =aU1U -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for Software Collections SIG content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Software Collections SIG group is pleased to announce a way of Software Collections packages availability for CentOS Linux users. The Software Collections packages have been build in CentOS Build System [1] and will be available soon on CentOS mirrors. Collections will be released in stacks, as we test and validate them. With Software Collections provided by SCLo SIG, users of CentOS Linux as well as other SIG groups in the CentOS ecosystem will be able to use the latest versions of popular application stacks, databases or other content mainly focused on developers. And they are able to do this without any impact to the system versions already installed on their machine. The SCLo SIG is not only meant to include packages rebuilt from Software Collections that have been made available in Red Hat Software Collections (RHSCL), but it is also meant to include updated content or collections that are not part of the RHSCL portfolio at all. So far, the collections rebuilt by SCLo SIG from RHSCL are devassist09, devtoolset-3, git19, httpd24, mariadb55, maven30, mongodb24, mysql55, nginx14, nginx16, nodejs010, perl516, php54, php55, postgresql92, python27, python33, rh-java-common, rh-mariadb100, rh-mongodb26, rh-mysql56, rh-passenger40, rh-perl520, rh-php56, rh-postgresql94, rh-python34, rh-ror41, rh-ruby22, ror40, ruby193, ruby200, thermostat1 and v8314. With Software Collections that are not part of RHSCL (so far sclo-vagrant1 collection), both CentOS Linux and RHEL users will be provided by content that is not available on those platforms otherwise. Getting started with Software collections: On an updated CentOS Linux 7/x86_64 machine run: yum install centos-release-scl This will enable the right repositories, and bring any metadata needed to validate the content. Learn more about Software Collections concepts at: http://softwarecollections.org/ You can find information on the SIG at https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo this includes howto get involved and help with the effort. [1]: http://cbs.centos.org - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWKllPAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtRL8H/2Xt2FVKc+z+GIv8FOZmujRv ou9OqR6UxusgWBPVBaIZ3HTTaVYRkbzt7VpbGcsbxeA6q98LyAonCOn1hoZv+d1x SaItfkDIbz7e4lln7YUvrgfuKlNAZ7kzTXGY301VndZQRV/jU3sf4JuUR9upO9qx J8jkKS+/1g0QP0LRATCafHlDd9PbIirASOmHcc47GyPQRD+683ulwiE7ADFw1gbP CTVlGnXzxnFoJGGO9ZKhV9L374nWMVBqOqIF7oGddrrQ2rmSzI8P7InVjv8cMXVa 78f54x/E7/0jBJe4S0T4Wgy6uHo7y2Al8hto3DOktXnUofaOxZ6v9kGA32Svlpc= =ace6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] PV AMI for CentOS 7
On 17/10/15 18:48, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org > <mailto:mail-li...@karan.org>> wrote: >>> On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: >>>> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM >>>> version at >>>> https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8=0-2=1442957668341 >>>> >>>> <https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8=0-2=1442957668341> >>>> >>>> We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, >>>> c1, etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could >>>> migrate to CentOS 7 on those image types. >>>> >>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499 >>>> <https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499> >>>> <https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499 >>>> <https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499>> >>>> >>> >>> definitely willing to have a go at this, but there hasent been a huge >>> request for the pv ami's; also when we tried this back in the early >>> centos7 days, there were a string of issues. >> >> >> Thanks! I’m happy to be a testing ground, will definitely give you good >> feedback, and can even give you access to a test node if you need one ;) > > Has there been any progress on this? Is there any way I can assist? > my last reply to the thread got no response, I've pushed this out for the time being, happy to come back into the next build cycles and try to address it again. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] Update for centos-release-openstack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The CentOS Cloud SIG ( https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud ) is releasing a new OpenStack metadata package called centos-release-openstack-kilo that replaces centos-release-openstack. Metadata packages in CentOS are used to setup the repositories used by the package manager ( yum ) and the signing keys used to validate content installed from the corresponding repositories. The present metadata package, called centos-release-openstack, does not allow for us to have multiple OpenStack versions available to users, without adding many layers of complexity to the install and update process. This new OpenStack metadata package ( centos-release-openstack-kilo ) effectively sets up the mechanics required for us to deliver OpenStack Liberty as an alternative to users who might prefer the newer codebase, once it's available. However, we would like to still support the users who have a Kilo install at the moment, and would like to run that as long as updates are available for Kilo itself. Kilo to Liberty update process will require administrative actions, for details see "Upgrade Notes" in upstream release notes https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Liberty The metadata rpm for OpenStack Liberty will be called centos-release-openstack-liberty and users will be able to install it once released. For more information on our progress with that effort, please join the Cloud SIG meetings that are held weekly on #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net or join us on the centos-devel mailing list ( https://lists.centos.org/ ). The updated metadata package, centos-release-openstack-kilo, is now available on all CentOS mirrors, and can be installed by running either 'yum update centos-release-openstack' or 'yum install centos-release-openstack-kilo' - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWIT6SAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbt5OUH/AoA9RW3H2w2YxzRFDkZJOS9 GFuxBSxX7C1hQ+u/5XQlEYx/hj4oaJSeWEBd5bOCyCxVJRSFakUy2LjenErbaX5n QiUdYtaDh2MP72doiGTbOyMpRbJT9jnbuSrSzd4t9oEVGOWyP+gLlaU0QhL4ST3t 01m1Z6vxd0VYmXWpGYH1gK65GEymYNb5vE/MwLFq+Apm2DXELKoPgtwRkwyiT19d aV+xT4f2qLrtI5YMVKspjNxKYOX72yExzrbcaUersTbTmsJB9zCrbi3sqAy/BOv9 jnCpG677EHre6R23ipQ36rUSi401FC8dnN89kO3+joUBtqsPYZw6P8p9brKKC68= =T+80 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 Rolling media Sept 2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am pleased to announce general availability of the September 2015 snapshot for CentOS Linux. This release includes CentOS Linux 7 iso based install media, Generic Cloud images, Atomic Host, Docker containers, Vagrant images, vendor hosted cloud images and live media. CentOS Linux rolling builds are point in time snapshot media rebuild from original release time, to include all updates pushed to mirror.centos.org's repositories. This includes all security, bugfix, enhancement and general updates for CentOS Linux. Machines installed from this media will have all these updates pre-included and will look no different when compared with machines installed with older media that have been yum updated to the same point in time. All rpm/yum repos remain on mirror.centos.org with no changes in either layout or content. - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 install media is available at http://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64/ File: CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1509-01.iso Sha: 4fafcd4abd790b7283d50facd4de41deccb62868e27dad37a54b27129222998c File: CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1509-01.iso Sha: 73db42de8a555ddac7deb4574efee04b120ed187c82f9a8dff205de83680516a File: CentOS-7-x86_64-Everything-1509-01.iso Sha: 77347e2961088f623965e73f940f644a1662d59874eb8d4cc90275a6e3f0c35f - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Live Media is also available at : http://buildlogs.centos.org/rolling/7/isos/x86_64 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GNOME-1509-01.iso Sha: bd00d27950c5447f3df70415b338a4d3b0969e97b5040dea611fbfca8c0a38ad File: CentOS-7-x86_64-LiveKDE-1509-01.iso Sha: 4286416fbe10697bb10694213f1a61281b3055f7cbb94938d132b8b386f04d08 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-LiveCD-1509-01.iso Sha: a5874992f1bb6fcc48702f49611164a4810816e7f8cfdd5ac9cd5fe226ddd815 - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Cloud Images are available at : http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1509.qcow2 Sha: 1ed60e89401fcd4fe1b7387452ff41afd617c30e10dd5623438a0231b5694be9 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1509.qcow2c Sha: 7747e2e4cbac0259e9c6bf0be749ab43778414010d918f56107776b2c3b2e955 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1509.qcow2.xz Sha: fbada05b9d8067f16138a645376e188c19d0c3cbf93401ba1c5a899ac1eaac81 File: CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1509.raw Sha: 6167d7a2a40bd78d8ccdf1794fa5e9d44f1df567a3aaa6024022b534e868aa38 - CentOS Atomic Host was released earlier, details for the release are available at : http://seven.centos.org/2015/10/new-centos-atomic-host-release-available - -now/ - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 Vagrant images are updated at https://vagrantcloud.com/centos/boxes/7 and the backing files can be downloaded for libvirt and virtualbox providers at : Libvirt: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/vagrant/x86_64/images/CentOS-7-Vagrant- 1509-x86_64-01.LibVirt.box and Virtualbox: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/vagrant/x86_64/images/CentOS-7-Vagrant- 1509-x86_64-01.box Note that the backing box's are now updated to run with a 40GB disk, sparse allocated so it does not result in a larger download size. - CentOS Linux 7 / x86_64 in vendor environments, including Amazon web services, are being updated and will be released online working through vendor process's. - CentOS Linux 5 / 6 and 7 docker images are updated at http://index.docker.io/_/centos - We welcome all feedback around these rolling builds and media updates at the centos-devel mailing list ( http://lists.centos.org/ ). enjoy! - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWHOJBAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtb24IAKrj8TSpHZQuAq1RZBODpI66 dI/80RA4N6LyOcCqTyMNpgn8oYpFARydrSCFCi6tWgj+mGHGt+niAuk8DVn8kUek JLqCibS2h4QIUB3w2ngBFwgE1p0/g+pvwLF6doIa/2URn/OxGFeHafSrU4FLklRl PCVjook1wJpxzhxjTX4sFhatw4Z6YUfISXHMDF19esRuNioWLzmEUQWAWp0gvCt/ PzC7WkhHoJs4lo0Z1KrLO0NGIkWRrz1FIpesJBLamnJN9MUI1YO9uqJV8aKhYwYW uEheoQKwnAo2aOKnNttD+s+kBN7qUCnshnht8uGTLqM/p5TZTs3NS6eaW1YZihg= =ogyH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] PV AMI for CentOS 7
On 23/09/15 19:58, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org> wrote: >> On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: >>> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM >>> version at >>> https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8=0-2=1442957668341 >>> >>> We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, c1, >>> etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could migrate to >>> CentOS 7 on those image types. >>> >>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499 >>> <https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499> >>> >> >> definitely willing to have a go at this, but there hasent been a huge >> request for the pv ami's; also when we tried this back in the early >> centos7 days, there were a string of issues. > > > Thanks! I’m happy to be a testing ground, will definitely give you good > feedback, and can even give you access to a test node if you need one ;) > just done some builds and had some success on PV instances locally, can you drop me an email at kbsingh_centos.org and we can get you setup and maybe get some testing / feedback from your instances as well ( I am not tesing on ec2 itself ). regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-virt] kvm-qemu-ev in testing
hi, kvm-qemu-ev from virt7-kvm-common-release is now signed and available on buildlogs.centos.org for testing, the corresponding release file is available in the centos/7/extras/ location on buildlogs as well. Once we have some testing, we can push and announce via mirror.centos.org for wider adoption. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 7 AMI on AWS GovCloud region
On 28/09/15 14:55, Patrick Varilly wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on building a cluster on AWS atop CentOS 7. For > development, I've been working in the eu-west-1 (Ireland) region, where > the AWS MarketPlace provides an official CentOS 7 AMI (ami-e4ff5c93). > However, the production deployment is taking place in AWS's GovCloud > region for regulatory reasons, and there, I couldn't find an official > CentOS 7 AMI. > > Are there plans to provide an official CentOS 7 AMI for the GovCloud > soon? Or instructions on how the official AMIs are built? I'm happy to > help build an AMI for public use following the instructions if someone > can point me in the right direction. > > Thanks for your help, let me bring this up with the amp folks and see what they say, i bet the govcloud needs a lot more paperwork etc to get setup from our side. but lets find out, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] PV AMI for CentOS 7
Hi, On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote: > Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM > version at > https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00O7WM7QW/ref=srh_res_product_title?ie=UTF8=0-2=1442957668341 > > We have prepurchased reserved instances based on older PV machines (m1, c1, > etc) It would be very very helpful to have a PV AMI so we could migrate to > CentOS 7 on those image types. > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499 > <https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9499> > definitely willing to have a go at this, but there hasent been a huge request for the pv ami's; also when we tried this back in the early centos7 days, there were a string of issues. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
