Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x - /proc/ide ?
On 27/07/2012 15:58, TFML wrote: I was curious, why was /proc/ide removed and was it moved to another directory to obtain ide drivers information? From the upstream vendor's deployment guide[0]: Later versions of the 2.6 kernel have made the /proc/ide/ and /proc/pci/ directories obsolete. The /proc/ide/ file system is now superseded by files in sysfs; to retrieve information on PCI devices, use lspci instead. For more information on sysfs or lspci, refer to their respective man pages. Therefore you should be able to find the same information from /sys somewhere - where exactly is left as an exercise to the reader. [0] http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-proc.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6 Status updates
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:15:28PM +0100, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Scott Robbins wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:17:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:47 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Or edit /etc/inittab to boot to runlevel 3, or just init 3 from the command line (which you can reach via ctrlalt-f1) or I think you can append 3 to the kernel line... That doesn't work on Debian/Ubuntu because runlevels 2-5 are the same. ?!?!?! 2 isn't much used, except as a set of steps. But 3 and 5 are the same in Debian/Ubuntu? That's not like *any* other version of *Nix. snip mark Debian's configuration (at least wrt 3 and 5 being aliases for the same runlevel) is very similar to Slackware and Gentoo. The number and use of runlevels, traditionally, have not been defined (although the LSB has tried to address this) and different conventions have been used in various distributions (and, move widely, unices) - the use of 7 runlevels out of a possible 10 also appears to be more convention than any hard-and-fast rule. That said the convention used by CentOS does appear to be the most common (and closest to the LSB's definition) in use by Linux distros today. On System V and Solaris runlevel 5 is halt so you might get a nasty surprise if you were expecting X11! Laurence ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:11:52PM +, Digimer wrote: How about the rest of you? What are you looking forward to in CentOS 6 when it is released? For me the big wins with CentOS 6 should be SSSD to simplify and centralise (on the machine) network authentication and (hopefully!) graphics drivers which work with our hardware out-of-the box. Laurence ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
