Re: [CentOS] Alternatives to apache for php based servers: Nginx

2011-03-11 Thread Mark Foster
On 03/11/2011 10:54 AM, robert mena wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Anyone here using Nginx as alternative to apache in conjunction to php
 scripts?
 
 Care to share thoughts and caveats?
 
 I am reading that it is a good alternative but do not know the real life
 limitations, diferences to apache, which repo to fetch etc.

First off let me say that nginx is awesome. If you are running a LAMP
stack and cannot use fastcgi with apache then you can put nginx in front
of apache to handle static content requests. Result is dramatic decrease
in memory footprint since you can reduce the number of concurrent apache
procs. Nginx uses a more efficient request handling so you can serve
thousands of clients in under 100MB. I think you can also use fastcgi
with nginx. I haven't done it.

Apache can achieve similar efficiencies with the alternate mpm models
i.e. not prefork.
-- 
Mark D. Foster m...@foster.cc
http://mark.foster.cc/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Security updates for CentOS-5

2011-03-09 Thread Mark Foster
Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
outstanding issues.
Thanks.
-- 
Mark D. Foster m...@foster.cc
http://mark.foster.cc/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS-virt] virtual sprawl - managing password changes

2008-05-16 Thread Mark Foster

Jeff Larsen wrote:

We are using the free VMware Server on CentOS 4. Almost all of our VMs
are CentOS 4 as well. We have 7 VMware hosts with about 40 total
virtual machines. It's been a very successful architecture for us.

I'm wondering how the rest of the community is managing updates of
root (and other local account) passwords in a virtual sprawl
environment (or a physical environment with lots of hosts).

I have read about things like expect, puttycs, centralize with kerberos, etc.

But I'm not looking for options here, I want to hear actual
experiences! What has worked for you, what hasn't worked? Or do you
feel that the chance for failure is to great and the results too
catastrophic?
  
Puppet can control user attributes like passwords quite easily, provided 
you set it up right.

http://www.reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetRedHatCentos

CFengine can as well but not so elegantly as puppet which implements a 
provider model (users, group, packages, cronjobs etc)


--
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints...
Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://mark.foster.cc/


___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS] DNS CNAME question

2007-10-25 Thread Mark Foster
Rogelio wrote:
 Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so,
 please point me to a better listserv), but is there anything wrong
 RFC or best practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server?

Of course not... it is completely off-topic for a CentOS list.
Since you are relying on their (free) service it is a good idea to ask
everydns what they support ... Looks like
http://faq.everybox.com/general/what-NS-set-should-I-use has your answer.
I can tell you that using CNAMEs for name servers is just not going to work.

-- 
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
 intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'
Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://mark.foster.cc/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Local mirroring of the CentOS repos

2007-10-11 Thread Mark Foster
Scott Silva wrote:
 With the space crunch on the CentOS mirrors, I don't know why they
 don't just have the latest files in the updates mirrors and move all
 the older stuff to vault. If someone wants an older release of a file,
 you need to get it directly anyway. It wouldn't save a ton of space,
 but it would save some.

I couldn't agree more!

-- 
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
 intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'
Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://mark.foster.cc/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [OT] DNS queries issue

2007-10-04 Thread Mark Foster
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
 1.8GB's of these seems incredibly excessive... I wonder if they're not
 legitimate DNS requests trying to get to you because you're the SOA for
 some domain... 
   
I've seen this sort of behavior from broken resolvers trying to follow a
fully-lame delegation.
If you suspect that could be it, try a dns report of the domain being
queried.
http://member.dnsstuff.com/pages/dnsreport.php

-- 
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
 intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'
Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://mark.foster.cc/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] centosplus kernel question

2007-09-14 Thread Mark Foster
I noticed a new upstream kernel was released yesterday and now wondered 
how long until the corresponding version of the centosplus kernels are 
updated?


https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0705.html

--
Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'

Mark D. Foster, CISSP [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://mark.foster.cc/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos