Re: [CentOS] linux-3.0 packages for CentOS?
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:33:11 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: Anyone packaging the new kernel for RH / CentOS? You need a new version of module-init-tools that is compatible with Linux 3.x series. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=245705 - Fix handling of Linux 3.x series kernels Therefore, Linux 3.0 will not work on CentOS 6. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: RHEL 6.1 is out
2011/5/23 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: I have said this a million times ... but you are flat out wrong. The community does many, many things for CentOS. It is the community that makes the CentOS Fora one of the best place to get information. The community does all the articles on the CentOS Wiki. It is the Community that answers questions on bugs.centos.org It is the community that does the graphics for CentOS. It is the community that is currently doing the website redesign. It is the community that is on the QA team, testing before release. It is the community that provides all the technical support. We never said, anywhere, that the community would build the packages, nor did we say we would teach people how to make the distribution ... Hi Johnny, I think the problem is the long waiting time. For example: CentOS 4.0 = 23 days after RHEL 4.0 CentOS 5.0 = 28 days after RHEL 5.0 CentOS 6.0 = 192 days + CentOS 6.1 = ??? The next problem: After the release of CentOS 6.0, there are no current (6.1) security updates for CentOS 6.0. How about a fundamental change? A completely open development process like at Fedora? CentOS is a great operating system. But many people have lost confidence in CentOS. ... No security updates for months and very long release cycles. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org: Oracle has supposedly released their EL 6 build (last Friday) ... but they have not released their sources as of this post. http://oss.oracle.com/el5/ === EL 5 Sources http://oss.oracle.com/el6/ === 404 Error No, the sources are here: http://oss.oracle.com/ol6/ And the RPMs: http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/0/base/ Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?
2011/2/16 David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net: That Red Hat keeps their work schedule private is not directly comparable to a CentOS community effort, how I see it. Red Hat is also a big financial organisation, which CentOS is not. In that context, Red Hat is much more responsible for stock holders, informing the stock market on economical issues. And market speculations needs to be controlled much more differently. It will be market speculations, like it or not, no matter what, all which most often are related to product releases. In addition, Red Hat also are responsible for customer and partner agreements, certification training, etc, etc. It's a big machinery, which is tightly connected to the Open Source work Red Hat does. And revealing some of the Open Source process might reveal other things indirectly, which makes the market speculate more wildly. CentOS does not need to be responsible for a board of stock holders (or what the proper term is), partners, (paying) customers, training organisations, etc, etc. In such regard, CentOS is quite more lucky - it can focus primarily on the Open Source part. Red Hat does also much more than just pulling the pieces together to form the RHEL distribution. These pieces are improved continuously to make them work well in the big distribution perspective, as well making sure it is tested on a vast variety of certified hardware [1]. CentOS basically takes the core result of all those processes and the labour Red Hat has put into RHEL, strips out/replaces the trademarks with CentOS replacements, recompiles everything and have a release ready. Hence, the CentOS process should, in theory at least, be a lot easier than the RHEL process - the majority of the hard work is already done when Red Hat delivers an installable RHEL distribution. Given that CentOS can focus primarily on the Open Source part, it should also be able to be more transparent on its process. Hi David, You're absolutely right. The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open development process. What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS? Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?
2011/2/16 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org: On 02/16/2011 02:22 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote: The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open development process. What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS? Its funny you say that Morten, since you actually offered to help. Didnt you ? But then when I asked you to look at something specific, you backed off saying you had other things to do ( I remember being quite taken aback by your response at the time ). Why you dont you just stick to lurking, since you clearly dont actually want to do anything to help - just get in the way and try to make a lot of noise you dont either understand or want to put any effort into understanding. Would you call that a fair take on the state of your envolvement Morten ? Karanbir, this is not quite right. And you know it. I offered my help for testing. (qa process) You have offered me to help with packages that need upstream branding removed. This is very difficult to realize when the primary mailing list (centos-qa) is completely closed to outsiders. Many people (including me) would like to CentOS help if the development process would be more open. I think you are doing a great job with CentOS! And for that you have my full appreciation. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?
2011/2/14 robert mena robert.m...@gmail.com: Hi, Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on either versions regarding the current status. So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%) I wonder for a long time why there is no detailed information about the release status. For example: 1) Upstream 5.6 release 2) rebuilding packages (2-3 days) 3) CentOS patches (1-7 days) 4) QA (2-3 weeks) 5) distribution on the mirrors (3-4 days) 6) CentOS 5.6 Release A small roadmap would certainly help many users. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel panic
2010/12/9 masatheesh masathe...@gmail.com: Hi, I have CentOS 5.0 installed my system.It shows kernel panic - not syncing : fatal exception error during boot process.Can any one please suggest to resolve this kernel panic? I am very eager to solve this without upgrade the version for home work. Please use CentOS 5.5. 5.0 is no longer supported by CentOS. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] linux-2.6.18.tar.bz2 is missing
2010/11/30 Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca wrote: [r...@hylafax SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba --target x86_64 kernel-2.6.spec You are building as root. This is a bad practice. When building a CentOS custom kernel, please try following the instructions in: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel I suggest to use mock for building CentOS/RHEL or fedora packages. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock For example: mock -r epel-5-x86_64 --rebuild kernel.src.rpm Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upcoming mailman version change?
2010/11/22 Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com: Hi, I'm using CentOS on a box that, among other things, offers mailman mailing lists, currently mailman 2.1.9. Version 2.1.14 is avilable from the developers but integrating it into the system promises to be tedious. I looked at RHEL 6 and don't know where to look to find the version there, which I assume will be the version in CentOS 6. Can anyone either confirm what version will be in C6 or where to find the full feature list in RHEL 6? Dave Hi Dave, It is mailman 2.1.12. [r...@x86-002 ~]# yum info mailman Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security Available Packages Name : mailman Arch : x86_64 Epoch : 3 Version: 2.1.12 Release: 14.el6 Size : 7.2 M Repo : rhel-x86_64-server-6 Summary: Mailing list manager with built in Web access License: GPLv2+ Description: Mailman is software to help manage email discussion lists, much like : Majordomo and Smartmail. Unlike most similar products, Mailman gives : each mailing list a webpage, and allows users to subscribe, : unsubscribe, etc. over the Web. Even the list manager can administer : his or her list entirely from the Web. Mailman also integrates most : things people want to do with mailing lists, including archiving, mail : - news gateways, and so on. : : Documentation can be found in: /usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.12 : : When the package has finished installing, you will need to perform some : additional installation steps, these are described in: : /usr/share/doc/mailman-2.1.12/INSTALL.REDHAT Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrading Centos-Xen when version 6 comes along
2010/11/16 Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com: I am curious what is the best way to upgrade my dom0 and domUs to V.6 (currently 5) when it releases. Any experience or docs on this? Hi, take a look at here: http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/chap-Virtualization-v2v-migration.html and http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/convert-a-local-xen-guest.html Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Officially Released
2010/11/11 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com: Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end, but it took a lot longer than doing a clean install. That's the point. The cost to upgrade is probably higher than a clean installation. It has changed so much between RHEL5 and RHEL6. I recommend everyone a clean installation. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
2010/11/10 Juergen Gotteswinter j...@internetx.de: oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1 No, that are additional packages. (called bind97 and php53) For example: yum install bind97-utils or yum install php53-mysql The old versions continue to be supported by Red Hat. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Officially Released
2010/11/10 Digimer li...@alteeve.com: I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on. RHEL 5.6 isn´t released yet. Only the beta of RHEL 5.6 was released yesterday. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 Officially Released
2010/11/10 mattias m...@mjw.se: sound intrested ddownload link? The beta of RHEL 5.6 is only available via the Red Hat Network. (RHN) Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6 potential release date???
2010/11/9 Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com: https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :) Hi, RHEL 5.6 Beta: - bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support - PHP 5.3 - support for namespaces That sounds great :) Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Running a DNS signed zone on Centos 5.5
2010/11/9 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com: My DNS server has been running Centos for some time. I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know). Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well, but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND 9.3.6 and a thread on the BIND list recommends against running a DNSSEC master zone on anything less than 9.6 and you really should be on 9.7. Hi Robert, Take a look at here: http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/5.6-test/ http://people.redhat.com/atkac/bind/5.6-test/bind97-9.7.0-1.P2.src.rpm This is working fine with CentOS 5.5. If you don't have enough time to compile it: http://download.imt-systems.com/rhel5/bind/ Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: What is the rationale behind deactivating Sendmail. Just curious. Or is it the typical rant Sendmail is insecure, see its history? I don't understand why many people calling sendmail insecure. Sendmail is the default MTA in RHEL, Solaris, AIX, FreeBSD, OpenBSD ... Why should they use an insecure MTA? Sendmail is a very robust and reliable MTA. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] security updates
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote: I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe? CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EXT4 mount issue
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote: I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. . Maybe he was referring to some old information dating back to the development period. ext4 has been declared stable by the kernel people. As a matter of fact it is now the default filesystem for several major Linux distros. That's right. ext4 is also the default filesystem of the upcoming RHEL 6 release. We have many servers running with ext4 and ext4 is working perfectly without any problems. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail TLS verify=fail
Update: Problem solved Solution: The old certificate was a SSL server certificate only. For TLS receiving/sending you need a certificate with SSL client and SSL server purposes. Best regards, Morten -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:55 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Sendmail TLS verify=fail Am 21.09.2010 01:28, schrieb Morten P.D. Stevens: Hi, I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification. The tls verify fails on our internal/external sendmail servers. For example: STARTTLS=server, relay=mx1.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.60], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256 STARTTLS=server, relay=acsinet12.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.42], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256 What's the problem? That means the server side does not know the CA of the certificate presented by the client. http://www.sendmail.org/m4/starttls.html The sendmail tls certificate should be okay on both servers. Does anyone know something about this issue? (verify=fail) http://www.sendmail.org/m4/starttls.html Nothing serious. Just a log note. Thank you. Best regards, Morten Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Hole in 64-bit Linux kernel provides root rights
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: All centos-5 kernels are affected. - KB Here is the updated kernel source from upstream: kernel-2.6.18-194.11.4.el5.src.rpm https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0704.html Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Sendmail TLS verify=fail
Hi, I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification. The tls verify fails on our internal/external sendmail servers. For example: STARTTLS=server, relay=mx1.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.60], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256 STARTTLS=server, relay=acsinet12.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.42], version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256 What's the problem? The sendmail tls certificate should be okay on both servers. Here is the output of the openssl starttls check: Server 1 [r...@mx1 ~]# openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect acsinet12.imt-systems.com:25 New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Server public key is 2048 bit Secure Renegotiation IS supported Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE SSL-Session: Protocol : TLSv1 Cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Session-ID: FE604F9A1765705F518A416F824DDE0B4316C52F36A3171A1593DC503EB63404 Session-ID-ctx: Master-Key: 57DB71C1E48CA6AC4E5C381B28915AF0A2D66F23D80919E05DFB77345586D6F63AD6C9A7929880E29045CD7D3ADD9556 Key-Arg : None Krb5 Principal: None Start Time: 1285023670 Timeout : 300 (sec) Verify return code: 0 (ok) --- 250 HELP quit 221 2.0.0 acsinet12.imt-systems.com closing connection On the other server: Server 2 [r...@acsinet12 ~]# openssl s_client -starttls smtp -connect mx1.imt-systems.com:25 New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Server public key is 2048 bit Secure Renegotiation IS supported Compression: zlib compression Expansion: zlib compression SSL-Session: Protocol : TLSv1 Cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA Session-ID: 4FEA16066A719033CEA69C185EDDA504CA8EDB1BB572C21A6BEB303F15F76621 Session-ID-ctx: Master-Key: 615713E2500A52E996F2BB27F3A6A0CF9A471212805120BCC81623656327A9B6184BBB61F6CF28D6E62408397CF2D221 Key-Arg : None Krb5 Principal: None PSK identity: None PSK identity hint: None Compression: 1 (zlib compression) Start Time: 1285024237 Timeout : 300 (sec) Verify return code: 0 (ok) --- 250 HELP quit 221 2.0.0 mx1.imt-systems.com closing connection The verify return code: 0 (ok) seems to be okay on both servers? Here is the sendmail TLS configuration: (Server 1) define(`confCACERT_PATH', `/etc/pki/tls/certs')dnl define(`confCACERT', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/mx1.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/mx1.key')dnl define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/mx1.crt')dnl define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/mx1.key')dnl (Server 2) define(`confCACERT_PATH', `/etc/pki/tls/certs')dnl define(`confCACERT', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/acsinet12.crt')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/acsinet12.key')dnl define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/acsinet12.crt')dnl define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `/etc/pki/tls/certs/acsinet12.key')dnl Does anyone know something about this issue? (verify=fail) Thank you. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Remove all packages from specific repository
Hi CentOS Mailinglist, we are using amavisd-new (with all dependencies) from Fedora/Redhat EPEL repo. Some packages from EPEL repo are very old. (amavisd-new, clamav, spamassassin) What's the best way to remove all amavisd-new packages (and it's dependencies) from EPEL repo and reinstall it from rpmforge repo? Thank you. Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Remove all packages from specific repository
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
To see the packages from a
particular Vendor, for example EPEL:[code]
rpm -qa --qf %{NAME} %{VENDOR} \n | grep Fedora Project | cut -d ' '
-f 1 | sort
[/code]
The result should be a list of EPEL packages.
Hi Phil,
This command is great to list (and remove) all packages from EPEL repository.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of b.j. mcclure Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:49 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release For those who might be interested, RHEL 6b2 has just been announced. http://www.redhat.com/rhel/beta Cheers, B.J. CentOS 5.5, Linux 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 x86_64 10:47:08 up 8 days, 14:45, 1 user, load average: 0.56, 0.55, 0.49 Hi, And here are the Release Notes for RHEL 6 Beta 2: http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6-Beta/html/Beta_2_Release_Notes/ Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:13 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release Hi, And here are the Release Notes for RHEL 6 Beta 2: http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6- Beta/html/Beta_2_Release_Notes/ The official Redhat mirror is very slow at the moment. Here is a faster mirror from my company for the x86-64 version: http://download2.imt-systems.com/rhel6b2/ Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] downgrade
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of mattias jonsson Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0 This is a big security risk because the CentOS team is only supporting the latest CentOS version. (5.5, 4.8 and so on) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5 Update error
Hi, I get the following error while installing the newest centos patches. [r...@gateway ~]# yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: centos.intergenia.de * base: centos.intergenia.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de * updates: centos.intergenia.de Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package glibc.i686 0:2.5-49.el5_5.2 set to be updated --- Package glibc.x86_64 0:2.5-49.el5_5.2 set to be updated --- Package glibc-common.x86_64 0:2.5-49.el5_5.2 set to be updated --- Package glibc-devel.x86_64 0:2.5-49.el5_5.2 set to be updated --- Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.5-49.el5_5.2 set to be updated --- Package mysql.i386 0:5.0.77-4.el5_5.3 set to be updated --- Package mysql.x86_64 0:5.0.77-4.el5_5.3 set to be updated --- Package mysql-server.x86_64 0:5.0.77-4.el5_5.3 set to be updated --- Package perl.x86_64 4:5.8.8-32.el5_5.1 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved Package Arch Version Repository Size Updating: glibc i686 2.5-49.el5_5.2 updates 5.3 M glibc x86_64 2.5-49.el5_5.2 updates 4.7 M glibc-common x86_64 2.5-49.el5_5.2 updates 16 M glibc-devel x86_64 2.5-49.el5_5.2 updates 2.4 M glibc-headers x86_64 2.5-49.el5_5.2 updates 592 k mysql i386 5.0.77-4.el5_5.3updates 4.8 M mysql x86_64 5.0.77-4.el5_5.3updates 4.8 M mysql-server x86_64 5.0.77-4.el5_5.3updates 9.8 M perl x86_64 4:5.8.8-32.el5_5.1 updates 12 M Transaction Summary Install 0 Package(s) Upgrade 9 Package(s) Total size: 61 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/File/Path.pm from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/cpan.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/dprofpp.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/enc2xs.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/find2perl.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/h2ph.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/h2xs.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/instmodsh.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/libnetcfg.1.gz
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Update error
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Yes, you see you have Perl 64-bit and 32-bit installed. You really need it as an i386 package? I have no problem updating x86_64 packages only. Hi Alexander, thank you. I removed perl.i386 and the yum update process is now working perfectly :) Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
