Re: [CentOS] mysqld not starting on reboot
or use text interface for this - ntsysv On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.com wrote: That helped :) Thanks, V On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.com I installed mysql using yum, so I have an /etc/init.d/mysqld file. For some reason, however, mysqld doesn't boot on reboot of the machine. Please advise. Did you use chkconfig like several people advised you to in previous posts? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Serg Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc?
Hi, maybe Gentoo Linux will be up on this server. my buddy has successfully ran it on Sun Blade 1000, but there is a UltraSPARC III and UltraSPARC III Cu CPUs ( UltraSPARC IIIi on the SF240). I think OpenSolaris will be better there ;) really have fun :) On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:44 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote: HI All, I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version of CentOS. Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache, postfix, mysql, etc. I know this is sort of a loaded question, but I don't have a lot of knowledge on distros that are stable on Sparc. -Jason ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Serg Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2
hi, if you're looking for a newest version of PHP these links below can be useful - http://oss.oracle.com/projects/php/files/EL5/i386/ http://oss.oracle.com/projects/php/files/EL5/i386/ http://blog.famillecollet.com/tag/php On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM, mbneto mbn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there any news regarding this? The last email I saw about the webstack is from april. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Eduardo Silvestre eduardo.silves...@nfsi.pt wrote: Hello z00dax, any update about this issue? As i can see, in centos 5.3 the version of php still 5.1.6. Did you have any ETA to php 5.2.0 be moved to release repo? I need upgrade to new php version to support DateTime function. Regards, --- Eduardo Silvestre nfsi telecom, lda. eduardo.silves...@nfsi.pt Tel. (+351) 21 949 2300 - Fax (+351) 21 949 2301 http://www.nfsi.pt/ - Original Message - From: Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:20:26 AM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP 5.2 Eduardo Silvestre wrote: Hello guys, i need to know where i can find php version 5.2? At the moment, php-5.2 for CentOS-5 is in the c5-testing repo, soon to be moved into the c5-webstack repo. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Sergey Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] resolv.conf rewritten every reboot. How to figure out who and why?
Maybe it overwritten by NetworkManager? On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Dave tdbtdb+cen...@gmail.comtdbtdb%2bcen...@gmail.com wrote: My machine has a static IP, with dhcp and IPv6 disabled. Every time I reboot, some process rewrites /etc/resolv.conf, including a comment about dhcpclient. The only package I have installed that shows up in rpm -qa|grep -i dhcp is dhcpv6-client-1.0.10-16.el5, and nothing in there is named dhcpclient. I'd like to figure out what software is rewriting this file and why. man 5 resolv.conf and man resolver are unhelpful in this case. rpm reports /etc/resolv.conf is not owned by any package. At this point, I am as (or more) interested in pointers regarding how to find the answer as I am in the actual answer. Please teach me to fish. mahalo, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Sergey Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] apache virtual host load monitoring
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:47 PM, David Hrbáčhrbac.c...@seznam.cz wrote: mod_proctitle is BSD only. Some solution is http://blog.antage.name/posts/%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B8-apache-2.html David Hrbáč yep, it's for BSD (but I heard that someone got it worked under linux).. thanks for the tips about mod_watch (ganglia looks as very huge solution for that purpose I think). any other tools guys? how you can see which of your vhost is most loaded? -- Sergey Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] apache virtual host load monitoring
Hi All, is there any tools/mods for apache2 which are you using to monitor the load of every virtual host? (e.g. mod_proctitle) thanks -- Sergey Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-virt] OpenBSD 4.5 in HVM domU network timeouts
Hi all, I am trying to install openbsd 4.5 amd64 in HVM domU. dom0 runs CentOS 5.3 x86_64 with xen 3.4.0 During installation process everything is looks good except network.. When I've configured the network parameters I began to receive multiple messages like this - re0: watchdog timeout and ping from dom0 to that domU is looks awesome: $ ping 10.10.10.10 PING 10.10.10.10 (10.10.10.10) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=3764 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=2756 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1756 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.10.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=5756 ms ... --- 10.10.10.10 ping statistics --- 974 packets transmitted, 972 received, 0% packet loss, time 972996ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1831.964/3849.323/7833.997/1421.748 ms, pipe 8 Does anybody know what's the problem? Is there any workaround? I've googled for something about model=ne2k_pci options in xen domain config, but haven't tried it yet (installation still in the progress..). Any hints? Thanks -- Sergey Smirnov email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] Strange XEN on CentOS HWaddr Address Issue
Hi, This commonly happens when you using Xen in the bridged mode (when you reboot your system the first time, this is default Xen configuration). You have to change your configuration to routed mode if you want to prevent that in future. You can get more info about network in Xen going by links below - http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking#head-d5446face7e308f577e5aee1c72cf9d156903722 P.S. my first experience with Xen starting from the same issue like your (is was a problem for me, because I have dedicated server and support stuff from hosting company every time when the NIC address was changed want to kick me)... :) On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Brett Serkezbser...@gmail.com wrote: Ran into a strange issue with XEN on CentOS that I think is specific to CentOS, which is why I'm starting by posting to this list first, I'll post on the XEN list depending on responses. My sense is this issue has something to do with how CentOS handles network setup on first boot of the XEN kernel. - Installed a brand new CentOS 5.3 server with minimal packages. - Installed XEN, modified grub.conf to boot off of the XEN kernel and rebooted. - After reboot, network connectivity was lost. - Investigation concluded the issue was that the HWaddr address of the physical NIC matched the fabricated HWaddr that XEN uses for most of its adapters: FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF. - Temporary resolution, I re-enabled the motherboard's NIC, rebooted, all seems to be working. I would like to get the NIC in question working as it is a GigaBit NIC, but it still has the HWaddr: FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF which conflicts with XEN. My understanding of the HWaddr is that the first portion is manufacturer assigned for uniqueness, I cannot image this NIC originally had this HWaddr, but I don't know what it originally was. Does anyone know if this value is read from the NIC on each boot, or is it stored in a file after the first boot? Is there someway to undo this change so the NIC returns to its original value or atleast a non-conflicting value? Has anyone else seen this behavior? Thank you in advance, Brett ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Sergey Smirnov Moscow, Russia GMT+3 cell phone: +7 919 104 8963 email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] firewall question
Hi Jerry, according your rules you have opened all incoming traffic to interface eth0 and eth1. I think that is the issue. Try to remove or modify them -- -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT Check how your other rules are working - take a look in the output of iptables -nL -v --line command (see packet count row).. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Jerry Geisge...@pagestation.com wrote: My firewall config is below... I am trying to figure out why another machine has access to port 5038 on my machine based on these firewall rules. I thought the reject at the bottom would take care of all other ports? It does not. I have restarted with server iptables restart and same thing. I can connect from another machine to my machine on port 5038. How do I prevent this? Jerry - This is my firewall: # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -d 224.0.0.251 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6540 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6500 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6510 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5060 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5036 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4569 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 1720 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 123 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6544 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Sergey Smirnov Moscow, Russia GMT+3 cell phone: +7 919 104 8963 email/xmpp: sergey.a.smir...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
