Re: [CentOS] why windows 10 can't access centos samba
On 12/09/2019 12.46, qw wrote: I update centos's samba to 4.8.3-6. My windows 10 is professional, whose version is 1803. I still can't access samba. Do I need update my windows 10 to 1903? andrew At 2019-09-12 17:45:10, "anax" wrote: On 12/09/2019 11.09, qw wrote: Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Andrew No problem here with: Centos: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) and Samba: samba-client-libs-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-common-4.8.3-6.el7_6.noarch samba-libs-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-client-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-common-tools-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 Windows 10: Windows 10 Home, Version 1903 suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos As far as I remember, samba worked already with the first Windows 10 installation I had years ago. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] why windows 10 can't access centos samba
On 12/09/2019 11.09, qw wrote: Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Andrew No problem here with: Centos: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) and Samba: samba-client-libs-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-common-4.8.3-6.el7_6.noarch samba-libs-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-client-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 samba-common-tools-4.8.3-6.el7_6.x86_64 Windows 10: Windows 10 Home, Version 1903 suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Delta RPMs (drpms) for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7
Hi Johnny for my installation, drpms do not provide any advantage, so if you see any advantage in discontinuing to include them, just do so. suomi On 04/06/2019 16.55, Johnny Hughes wrote: We are having issues with drpms on CentOS-6 i386 and x86_64 and on CentOS-7 x86_64. The technical issues sometimes cause us to have to rebuild all drpms over again .. and the time involved is very large. Also storing the drpms and moving them around takes up a lot of space and bandwidth. We would like to remove delta rpms (drpms) from our CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 repositories. But before we do , we would like a discussion on these lists to ensure this is not going to cause people major issues. So, begin the discussion, and we will address this again in about a month. And we'll see where it leads. Thanks, Johnny Hughes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 hibernation laptop
You may try using this page: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt suomi On 03/06/2019 17.54, H wrote: I have a recent Dell Inspiron laptop on which I installed CentOS 7. I have, however, failed somewhere since I do not have a hibernate option when shutting down, only a suspend option. I believe I created the necessary hibernation partition large enough for the RAM the machine has, 16 Gb if I remember correctly. How do I identify where the problem lies? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager and /etc/resolv.conf
On 11/19/18 6:49 AM, Simon Matter wrote: On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. unbound running on localhost. Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets restarted (usually only a system boot) it gets over-written. It seems every distro has a different way of preventing NetworkManager from replacing that file. I found instructions for Fedora that said create /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/no-dns.conf containing [main] dns=none That doesn't seem to have any effect. Poking around, I find a file on boot seems to be created called /var/run/NetworkManager/resolv.conf It has most of the contents of what ends up in /etc/resolv.conf - except w/o the last line, which just reads rotate in generated /etc/resolv.conf. It says it's generated by NetworkManager (both /etc/resolv.conf and the one in /var/run/NetworkManager) but neither are specific enough to indicate what is causing them to be created so I can turn it off. Anyone know how to tell NetworkManager to just not create that file? Using a cron job to overwrite it once a minute works but there must be a proper way. I really wish KISS was a design goal when designing system configuration. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Just found this - # cat dhclient-exit-hooks echo 'options rotate' >> /etc/resolv.conf That's where the last line in /etc/resolv.conf is coming from. Okay replacing the contents of dhclient-exit-hooks with echo -e 'nameserver 127.0.0.1\nnameserver ::1' > /etc/resolv.conf seems to do what I need. I hope RHEL/CentOS 8 do networking better, as in, not have spaghetti scripts called here and there making something that should be a config option hard to do. With DNS the only way to trust results is if the zone is signed and local resolver validates. You can't ever trust external nameservers defined by dhcp to validate. So there's very valid reasons to want to use local unbound. ___ I don't know about CentOS 7 because I'm running CentOS 6, but on other systemd distributions where I've run into similar issues I was either able to add a hardcoded DNS server to network manager or resolve the problem through systemd-resolved. In one case I resolved the issue best by disabling systemd-resolved, but if you check the man page for systemd-resolved as wells as the man page for resolved.conf (/etc/systemd/resolved.conf on other distributions) my sense is you will find a cleaner solution. It would seem to me that if you are running bind or powerdns on your local host, then it would make sense to me to disable systemd-resolved, since you don't need so many layers of caching dns resolvers. Alice was talking about CentOS 7.5, which doesn't have systemd-resolved nor does it have systemd-networkd. I didn't look at EL8 betas yet but we can probably expect systemd-networkd to be included there. If that's the case, we'll probably have legacy script based configs, NetworkManager and systemd-networkd/systemd-resolved. In other words, things may not get easier in the future but even more confusing. At least that's already the case if you run different distributions. Regards, Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi in august 1017 i had put away the following remark about this item: #edit gvim /var/run/NetworkManager/resolv.conf # to your needs # make /etc/resolv.conf a link to the above file rm /etc/resolv.conf ln -s /lib/systemd/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf # dns=none does not work in either /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf # nor in /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/dns.conf --- OR, much simpler: in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX PEERDNS=no IPV6_PEERDNS=no suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos on Dell XPS15
On 9/24/18 3:20 AM, H wrote: On 09/21/2018 03:59 PM, H wrote: On 09/18/2018 08:58 PM, H wrote: On 09/07/2018 04:01 AM, H wrote: On September 4, 2018 10:51:09 AM GMT+02:00, Patrick Laimbock wrote: -Original message- From:H Sent: Monday 3rd September 2018 14:52 To: Centos Mailing List Subject: [CentOS] Centos on Dell XPS15 Is anyone successfully running Centos 7 on a Dell XPS15? If so, which model? If not, what was the problem? Thank you! I only ran Fedora 28 Workstation Live from USB stick on the latest XPS15 (9570) and did not try CentOS 7. Fedora 28 ran great and the 4K screen is beautiful but the laptop had some issues so I sent it back. Issues: - the CPU throttles when putting it under load. The "fix"was to undervolt the CPU, turn off Turbo speed in the BIOS and turn off HT in the BIOS. This issue seems similar to the thermal problem the latest MacBook Pro had. IIRC Apple fixed it in a BIOS update. I don't know if/when Dell will fix it (or if they even can fix it). - fingerprint reader does not work. With the latest XPS13 (9370) Developer Edition, Dell "fixed" it by removing the fingerprint reader. - no separate PageUp and PageDown keys. The latest XPS13 does have them but on the XPS15 there were 2 gaps in the keyboard where those keys should be but aren't. - it's not possible to open the screen 180 degrees - the webcam at the bottom of the screen (aka NoseCam) is really annoying As an alternative to the XPS15 there's the new Inspiron 15 7000 series and the Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Extreme (though I have no idea if either of them runs CentOS 7). HTH, Patrick -- CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Very interesting, thank you! Is anyone running Centos on the Inspiron 15 7000 mentioned? I just looked at a Dell Inspiron 15 7570 that is refurbished and available at $850. Anyone running Centos 7 on this machine? I bought this machine and am now installing Centos 7 on it. It has a 4K screen and the text on the installation screens is miniscule. Has anyone else seen this and can it be changed when installing from DVD? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos After installing Centos 7 on this machine - and the MATE desktop - I have the following issues: - When the machine boots and asks for the password to decrypt the password, the text is minuscule, really minuscule... Can this be changed somewhere? - When it continues booting, the Centos boot animation is displayed in roughly the top-left 1/8 of the screen. Can this be changed somewhere so it uses the entire screen as is customary? - I see no option to hibernate the machine, only to suspend. Did I have to do anything special to make hibernation possible when installing Centos 7? The machine has 16 Gb of memory and the swap space was automatically set to 8 Gb. - The 4K desktop is unusable because the font, icons etc. are too small. Since I have not yet figured out how to increase font size etc. when in 4K mode, I changed display resolution to 1600 x 1200. This is only a stop-gap measure though and I hope there is a better solution. - The trackpad is obnoxious to use and it is very hard to use it to maneuver around the screen. Should I disable it and simply rely on the mouse? - I do like the fact that the touchscreen can actually be used to select windows in Centos, move them around etc. - When I have the Dell extension dock connected at startup, the OS crashes and gives me a stack dump. Disconnecting it and rebooting solves the problem but it really should not be like this... - Connecting the Dell extension dock after booting the computer results in some kind of crash every so often but the OS stays up. - Even with the dock not connected I have found the OS suddenly crashes and two seconds later
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7.5 on Vmware
Hi Greg here, I use Virtualbox for the following VMs: - Centos 7.5 - Fedora 28 - Windows 10 - Windows 7 - Windows XP and no problem sofar (cross fingers). I download VirtualBox directly from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/virtualbox/downloads/index.html That is, I don't use any Virtualbox package offerd by any of the repos. suomi On 06/28/2018 11:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Everyone, I am in the initial study phase of putting together a larger virtual server while using Centos 7.5 as the operating system of choice for the individual virtual machines. How do you all like VMware for this, or what other software allows for the development of virtural servers that use Centos 7.5 Thanks ahead of time for giving me a head start with your experiences -- Greg Ennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager updating resolv.cfg
Hi Shagun check your settings of PEERDNS and IPV6_PEERDNS... suomi On 06/21/2018 08:33 AM, Maheshwari, Shagun wrote: Hi, I am facing issue stoping NetworkManager to update resolv.cfg, I am using below configuration for eth0 interface: TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6INIT=yes IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy NAME=eth0 UUID=93b90a46-dab5-4a67-8fd0-fefe8874a8b9 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=no PEERDNS=no PEERROUTES=yes IPV6_PEERDNS=yes IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes DNS1= DNS2= Also, added dns=none in NetworkManager.conf file. Whenever I am restarting NetworkManager, resolv.cfg gets updated and only ipv4 nameserver is displaced, whether I am expecting both the ips (ipv6 and ipv4 address to be present in resolv.cfg file. Any suggestion here, how to achieve that?? Regards, Shagun ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] virt-manager change to bridged networking on CentOS 7.4
On 01/22/2018 02:57 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: Hi All, I have virt-manager running just fine currently using NAT. I want to "change" it to bridged network. The GUI is not letting me change anything on the network section. How do I change it to be bridged ? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Are you sure, that the virtual-machine is powered off while you are trying to change the network interface? suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found
On 01/12/2018 08:24 PM, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote: - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: "Adrian Jenzer"Aan: "CentOS mailing list" Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 januari 2018 16:56:57 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found -Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of johan.vermeul...@telenet.be Sent: Dienstag, 9. Januar 2018 16:34 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found Hello All, updating from Centos7.3 to Centos7.4 rendered one of our laptops unbootable. EM: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found Failed to load image \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi: Not Found start_image() returned Not Found How could this occur because of an update and how to fix this? What I tried is booting from centos usb, chroot to /mnt/sysimage and gave command: efibootmgr --create --label CentOS --disk /dev/sda1 --loader "\EFI\centos\shim.efi" This gave no EM, but booting remains impossible. I have to say I don't know whether to try grub2 of efibootmgr commands. Any help would be very much appreciated. Greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Johan I remember I had a similar issue and I resolved it by copying grubx64.efi from /centos : cp /boot/efi/EFI/centos/grubx64.efi /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT regards Adrian Adrian, thanks for helping me out. That didn't fix the system. The EM has changed though, it now simply says " no bootable device". Greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Johan appart from the above copy of the boot file, would you probably need something like this: efibootmgr -b -l EFI/BOOT/grubx64.efi i.e. tell BOOT to use the intended boot file. may be found out via efibootmgr -v BootCurrent: Timeout: 0 seconds No BootOrder is set; firmware will attempt recovery Boot* Notebook Hard Drive BBS(HD,,0x0)... Boot0001* Notebook Ethernet BBS(128,,0x0)E.. Boot0002* Centos HD(1,GPT,068e45cc-b2b6-4688-9974-ad7d27e419f8,0x800,0x7a000)/File(EFIcentosgrubx64.efi) by default is suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos7 Cant start vncserver
Hi Robert apparently vncserver writes its PID file somewhere else than into /home/root/.vnc/homebase.home.htt:3.pid, where systemd expects it to be. Go into /lib/systemd/system/vncserver.service and correct the PID file location there, so that it matches the location where vncserver writes its PID file. And then do a systemctl deamon-reload systemctl start vncserver and then after the SECOND start of vncserver (not the first) it will work. suomi On 05/25/2017 07:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Actually it is running: netstat -tuln | grep 590 tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:59010.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:59020.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:59030.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::5901 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::5902 :::* LISTEN tcp6 0 0 :::5903 :::* LISTEN Why 5901 and 2 are listening, I don't know... when I vnc to my server I get that basic nasty blank X11 screen. I modified /root/.vnc/xstartup with: exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc But restarting vncserver@:3 does not seem to get the vnc client to get my xfce desktop, only the blank x11 desktop. Oh and restart gives the same errors as start does, but the pids are there: # ls .vnc/ homebase.home.htt:1.log homebase.home.htt:2.pid passwd homebase.home.htt:1.pid homebase.home.htt:3.log xstartup homebase.home.htt:2.log homebase.home.htt:3.pid I see: cat .vnc/homebase.home.htt\:1.log Xvnc TigerVNC 1.3.1 - built Nov 16 2016 13:38:44 Copyright (C) 1999-2011 TigerVNC Team and many others (see README.txt) See http://www.tigervnc.org for information on TigerVNC. Underlying X server release 11702000, The X.Org Foundation Thu May 25 12:45:56 2017 vncext: VNC extension running! vncext: Listening for VNC connections on all interface(s), port 5901 vncext: created VNC server for screen 0 /root/.vnc/xstartup: line 5: /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc: Permission denied /root/.vnc/xstartup: line 5: exec: /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc: cannot execute: Permission denied 2.log has different errors. 3.log actually has connection information (as I am connecting to 5903?) thanks On 05/25/2017 12:37 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: OK, first time configuring vncserver on Centos7. I have read through a bunch of old messages here on vncserver and thought I had it. Obviously not. 1)cp /usr/lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service /etc/systemd/system/vncserver@.service 2)vi /etc/systemd/system/vncserver@.service I changed in both places to root 3)systemctl daemon-reload 4)systemctl enable vncserver@:3.service 5)vncpasswd To create /root/.vnc/passwd 6)systemctl start vncserver@:3.service # systemctl -l status vncserver@:3 ● vncserver@:3.service - Remote desktop service (VNC) Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/vncserver@.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: resources) since Thu 2017-05-25 12:31:13 EDT; 13s ago Process: 5173 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/runuser -l root -c /usr/bin/vncserver %i (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Process: 5170 ExecStartPre=/bin/sh -c /usr/bin/vncserver -kill %i > /dev/null 2>&1 || : (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) May 25 12:31:10 homebase.home.htt systemd[1]: Starting Remote desktop service (VNC)... May 25 12:31:13 homebase.home.htt systemd[1]: PID file /home/root/.vnc/homebase.home.htt:3.pid not readable (yet?) after start. May 25 12:31:13 homebase.home.htt systemd[1]: Failed to start Remote desktop service (VNC). May 25 12:31:13 homebase.home.htt systemd[1]: Unit vncserver@:3.service entered failed state. May 25 12:31:13 homebase.home.htt systemd[1]: vncserver@:3.service failed. Thanks for all help. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 / local unbound
Hi Alice man NetworkManager.conf in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf dns=none suomi On 04/11/2017 10:40 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Hello list - http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/90035/how-to-set-dns-resolver-in-fedora-using-network-manager That says it works for CentOS 5 and I *suspect* the methods there (3 listed) would work, but what is the best way with NetworkManager to set it up to use the localhost for DNS ? I'm paranoid about DNS spoofing and really prefer to have a local instance of DNSSEC enforcing unbound running on my CentOS 7 virtual machines (e.g. linode) Currently I just use a cron job that runs once a minute to over-write was it is /etc/resolv.conf so they don't use the DHCP assigned nameservers, but that does leave a short window every time the network is restarted. I'd like to know the proper way to set up Network Manager to just create nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver ::1 in /etc/resolv.conf Via google, it seems every distro approaches it differently and most instructions I have seen involve a GUI. I did not see how to do it in the CentOS documentation but it might be there and I just did not figure out how to search it for what I wanted. Those stackexchange methods look like they might work but they reference CentOS 5 and I know some NetworkManager stuff changed even just between 7.2 and 7.3 as I experienced incorrect IPv6 address after update as a result of those changes. Is there an "official" way to tell NetworkManager what I want in /etc/resolv.conf ? Or better yet, a way to just tell it to leave that file alone? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] laptop editing
Hi Mike yes, id does. I have here a HP Elite Book which requested an UEFI install. I put a micro SD with Fedora 25 into the slot, tell the laptop to boot from there, and off it goes. No problem sofar. suomi On 03/17/2017 06:10 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, John R Pierce wrote: DD the CentOS ISO onto a USB stick. boot from USB, format HD with anaconda, install as desired, done. Thanks. More or less the answer I was hoping for. My recollection had been that even when possible, booting from USB involved black magic. This helped: Pete BiggsSome do, some don't. They all come with USB ports though. https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey I have a bunch of SD cards and a interface. This should work: download CentOS iso dd it to an SD card through USB interface (as the entire volume, not to a file) plug in SD card to USB port on laptop turn on laptop hit /// to get to BIOS tell BIOS to boot from USB follow instructions Correct? Will it still work if it has UEFI? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then." -- John Woods ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Adobereader on Centos7 crashes
Hi Rob did you ever try sith master-pdf-editor? http://code-industry.net/free-pdf-editor.php The functionality you require in AR may be available from master-pdf-editor as well... suomi On 01/01/2017 07:11 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 01/01/17 04:35, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote: Hello All, I can't get Adobe Reader to run stable on Centos7, when trying to edit settings or trying to print, it crashes. The issue is people need to digitally sign pdf forms. When I open these forms with anything else then Adobereader, I get EM To view the full contents of this document, you need a later version of the PDF viewer. You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader from www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html I spent a lot of time trying to solve this with other pdf viewers, including google-chrome and Foxit, and trickery with ps2pdf and Pdfedit. Nothing works. I installed Adobereader following this: https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-adobe-acrobat-pdf-reader-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/ So I tried installing this on an up-to-date CentOS 7.3 system and it fails to find Error: Package: AdobeReader_enu-9.5.5-1.i486 (/AdbeRdr9.5.5-1_i486linux_enu) Requires: libpangox-1.0.so.0 which a yum whatprovides */libpangox-1.0.so.0 shows as: pangox-compat-0.0.2-2.el7.x86_64 : Compatibility library for pangox Repo: epel Matched from: Filename: /usr/lib64/libpangox-1.0.so.0 and even after an install of this package still fails - thus I suspect it relates to not finding the 32 bit version as the epel version installs this in /usr/lib64 What did you do to overcome this dependency? The signing of these forms is vital to my organization, so any help would be appreciated. Greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trouble setting up HP Officejet Pro 8600 printer on CentOS 7 + KDE
Hi Niki don't you need a hplip addon/plugin, which you can fetch from http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/install/install/index.html There, with the wizard, you get a file hplip-3.x.x.run which you download and run using bash hplip-3.x.x.run This will install the addon/plugin. suomi On 11/11/2016 08:49 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Hi, I just installed a CentOS 7 + KDE desktop in my office's network. So far, I'm quite happy with the results, though I have some trouble getting the printer to work. All the other machines in my office (server, desktops, workstation) are running Slackware64 14.1 or 14.2, and they can all use the printer perfectly. I installed hplip-gui and ran it. The printer is a network printer, it has a static IP in the network and can also be addressed by its hostname. [kikinovak@alphamule:~] $ host hp-officejet hp-officejet.microlinux.lan has address 192.168.2.252 When I run hp-setup with the default options, the setup program "sees" the printer, but informs me that there is a "communication problem". I figure this is because the default seach method is mDNS/Bonjour. I tried again with the SLP option, and this time the setup procedure went OK. Or it seemed so, as the test page was blank. Now what? A few details about my system: SELinux, IPv6 and firewall are disabled. CUPS is running OK. I checked on the HP website that this printer requires HPLIP 3.11.10 or greater, which seems OK, since the HPLIP version shipping with CentOS is 3.13.something. Cheers, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] netbook screen suddenly goes black
Try with CTRL-ALT-F2 (go to the console) and CTRL-ALT-F1 (go back to the X-Window). This may help... suomi On 06/20/2016 03:10 AM, Fred Smith wrote: Hi all! I'm running an up to date Centos-7 on my Acer Aspire One netbook. have been for, well, ever since C7 was released. Just had an event today that also happened 2 or 3 times with earlier systems installed, but I never pursued it. What happens is that suddenly while working away on the desktop the display suddenly goes black... not black as in turned off, I can see that the backlight is still on, but no image is displayed. Nothing I can do fixes it except a reboot. I've tried CTRL-ALT-BKSP, CTRL-ALT-DEL, alt+printscreen+r+e+i+s+u+b. none of them do anything noticeable. I've been looking at system logs and don't find anything that gives me a clue what is going wrong when that happens. neither dmesg, /var/log/Xorg*, nor /var/log/messages contins much. I've tried digging thru "man journalctl" and ultimately reading thru the output of journalctl with no arguments. Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking for or at? thanks! Fred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange behaviour of iptables in centos 7
On 03/08/2016 10:59 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 8 March 2016 at 09:22, anax <a...@ayni.com> wrote: On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" <a...@ayni.com> wrote: Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root@myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root@myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables -A INPUT -s 175.44.0.0/16 -j DROP [root@myserver ~]# The rule must be there since ages, because it has number 9 out of 76 similar rules. Today, on the same machine (I rechecked it to make sure not to confound machines), I see the following extract of the ftplog: 175.44.4.1272915 175.44.26.128 2021 175.44.26.138 1322 175.44.6.1861290 175.44.24.881219 175.44.4.1991212 saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptables. I also checked to see in man iptables, wheather the IP address is represented correctly. What im I missing? Please provide the full iptables listing as a snippet from one section is not useful. Keep in mind iptables does not go by the most specific entry but rather the first matching rule hit. If there are any rules prior to this drop that would permit the traffic then of course the traffic would be permitted. Also 7.0? Please get that system updated asap as you are missing many important (and higher) issues being fixed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi James [root@myserver ~]# cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) [root@myserver ~]# [root@myserver ~]# uname -a Linux myserver.mydomain.com 3.10.0-327.4.4.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jan 5 16:07:00 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@myserver ~]# A joyful thing to see ;) As for your issue itself - the rules seem sound to drop any packets arriving at the server from that /16 network. Are you sure that the iptables rule was added before the transfer logs you see? That it didn't happen that someone (or some process) saw abuse of ftp and then inserted the DROP rule afterwards? Remember position isn't always useful to gauge age of the rule since you can insert anywhere ... and only 9 packets have been matched by that rule in the full output... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi james I am absolutely sure, that the rule in question has been insertet into iptables more than a year ago, because I am (hopefully) the only one with root access to this server. There is no fail2ban on the server, which could have introduced the rule into iptables automatically. I have written the ruby program to extract the snippet of the ftp-log yesterday and have taken notice of the iptables missbehaviour this morning. suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange behaviour of iptables in centos 7
On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" <a...@ayni.com> wrote: Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root@myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root@myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables -A INPUT -s 175.44.0.0/16 -j DROP [root@myserver ~]# The rule must be there since ages, because it has number 9 out of 76 similar rules. Today, on the same machine (I rechecked it to make sure not to confound machines), I see the following extract of the ftplog: 175.44.4.1272915 175.44.26.128 2021 175.44.26.138 1322 175.44.6.1861290 175.44.24.881219 175.44.4.1991212 saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptables. I also checked to see in man iptables, wheather the IP address is represented correctly. What im I missing? Please provide the full iptables listing as a snippet from one section is not useful. Keep in mind iptables does not go by the most specific entry but rather the first matching rule hit. If there are any rules prior to this drop that would permit the traffic then of course the traffic would be permitted. Also 7.0? Please get that system updated asap as you are missing many important (and higher) issues being fixed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi James [root@myserver ~]# cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) [root@myserver ~]# [root@myserver ~]# uname -a Linux myserver.mydomain.com 3.10.0-327.4.4.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jan 5 16:07:00 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@myserver ~]# suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange behaviour of iptables in centos 7
On 03/08/2016 09:43 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 8 Mar 2016 07:36, "anax" <a...@ayni.com> wrote: Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root@myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root@myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables -A INPUT -s 175.44.0.0/16 -j DROP [root@myserver ~]# The rule must be there since ages, because it has number 9 out of 76 similar rules. Today, on the same machine (I rechecked it to make sure not to confound machines), I see the following extract of the ftplog: 175.44.4.1272915 175.44.26.128 2021 175.44.26.138 1322 175.44.6.1861290 175.44.24.881219 175.44.4.1991212 saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptables. I also checked to see in man iptables, wheather the IP address is represented correctly. What im I missing? Please provide the full iptables listing as a snippet from one section is not useful. Keep in mind iptables does not go by the most specific entry but rather the first matching rule hit. If there are any rules prior to this drop that would permit the traffic then of course the traffic would be permitted. Also 7.0? Please get that system updated asap as you are missing many important (and higher) issues being fixed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi James Thanks very much for your answer. the full iptables list is in my reply to John. But you are correct, I must update the system. This may fix the isssue. suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange behaviour of iptables in centos 7
On 03/08/2016 09:13 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 3/7/2016 11:35 PM, anax wrote: saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptables. I also checked to see in man iptables, wheather the IP address is represented correctly. which table is that rule in? INPUT, or a table invoked by input? are there rules affecting inbound FTP connections before that rule? Hi John Thanks for your answer. The complete output of iptables is: [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 30M packets, 6401M bytes) num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 10 0 ACCEPT udp -- * * 127.0.0.1 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 2 11 1133 ACCEPT udp -- * * 192.168.97.0/24 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 3 254K 17M ACCEPT udp -- * * 212.90.206.128/27 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 4 40M 2816Mudp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 recent: SET name: dnslimit side: source mask: 255.255.255.255 57717K 549M DROP udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 recent: UPDATE seconds: 10 hit_count: 20 name: dnslimit side: source mask: 255.255.255.255 6 823K 65Mudp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 STRING match "|ff0001|" ALGO name bm FROM 50 TO 65535 recent: SET name: dnsanyquery side: source mask: 255.255.255.255 7 337K 27M DROP udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 STRING match "|ff0001|" ALGO name bm FROM 50 TO 65535 recent: CHECK seconds: 10 hit_count: 3 name: dnsanyquery side: source mask: 255.255.255.255 80 0udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0udp dpt:53 STRING match "|e28098|" ALGO name bm FROM 50 TO 65535 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 101059 73305 DROP all -- * * 58.251.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 111099 77004 DROP all -- * * 74.63.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 121133 78600 DROP all -- * * 36.248.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 131130 77455 DROP all -- * * 14.222.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 141112 76977 DROP all -- * * 113.247.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 151397 95745 DROP all -- * * 112.90.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 16 11137 747K DROP all -- * * 5.39.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 17 57 4687 DROP all -- * * 185.29.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 188861 654K DROP all -- * * 37.59.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 19 133 7344 DROP all -- * * 165.228.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 201104 76908 DROP all -- * * 58.254.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 211076 75445 DROP all -- * * 99.157.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 22 215 14708 DROP all -- * * 201.10.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 231073 74411 DROP all -- * * 5.34.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 241124 80611 DROP all -- * * 46.29.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 251867 123K DROP all -- * * 104.232.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 26113K 15M DROP all -- * * 195.186.1.162 0.0.0.0/0 271077 74817 DROP all -- * * 112.111.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 281091 75748 DROP all -- * * 122.13.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 29 51 3528 DROP all -- * * 42.157.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 301367 87949 DROP all -- * * 78.188.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 31 60 3447 DROP all -- * * 218.161.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 32 727 83807 DROP all -- * * 218.203.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 331043 72394 DROP all -- * * 96.250.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 347332 507K DROP all -- * * 89.163.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 35 59 4240 DROP all -- * * 203.101.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 361063 73252 DROP all -- * * 117.204.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 371081 74869 DROP all -- * * 114.80.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 381387 104K DROP all -- * * 14.215.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 391273 87578 DROP all -- * * 14.152.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 402823 204K DROP all -- * * 46.105.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 411088 352K DROP all -- * * 66.85.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 426108 391K DROP all -- * * 220.181.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 431253 86598 DROP all -- * * 37.99.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 441092 75717 DROP all -- * * 88.206.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 45 950 66684 DROP all -- * *
Re: [CentOS] Strange behaviour of iptables in centos 7
On 03/08/2016 08:50 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 03/08/2016 08:35 PM, anax wrote: Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root@myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root@myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables -A INPUT -s 175.44.0.0/16 -j DROP [root@myserver ~]# The rule must be there since ages, because it has number 9 out of 76 similar rules. Today, on the same machine (I rechecked it to make sure not to confound machines), I see the following extract of the ftplog: 175.44.4.1272915 175.44.26.1282021 175.44.26.1381322 175.44.6.1861290 175.44.24.881219 175.44.4.1991212 saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptables. I also checked to see in man iptables, wheather the IP address is represented correctly. What im I missing? You mention iptables - but no mention of firewalld - they both use the same kernel mechanism, but it is important that both CANNOT be active! If you configure and use firewalld you can query ># iptables -L and see what is installed, however I have no idea if this exposes the entire set of firewall statements - others that better understand this space, feel free to weigh in. CentOS 7 has firewalld enabled by default, thus the choice to use iptables directly means that firewalld must be disabled. HTH thanks in advance suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Rob Thank you for your answer. I did really not consider that with firewalld. But when I check on the server I get: [root@myserver ~]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: inactive (dead) [root@myserver ~]# Also if I do: [root@myserver ~]# ps xa |grep firewall 12235 pts/0S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto firewall [root@myserver ~]# so firewalld is really not active. suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Strange behaviour of iptables in centos 7
Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root@myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 99 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root@myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root@myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables -A INPUT -s 175.44.0.0/16 -j DROP [root@myserver ~]# The rule must be there since ages, because it has number 9 out of 76 similar rules. Today, on the same machine (I rechecked it to make sure not to confound machines), I see the following extract of the ftplog: 175.44.4.1272915 175.44.26.128 2021 175.44.26.138 1322 175.44.6.1861290 175.44.24.881219 175.44.4.1991212 saying that from this IP addresse there have been this many connections to the ftp server on that machine during the last two days, which means that the iptables haven't dropped the connection to the machine. As far as I know, the ftp server is behind the iptables. I also checked to see in man iptables, wheather the IP address is represented correctly. What im I missing? thanks in advance suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 & dhclient hooks
Did you check the log files /var/log/daemonlog, /var/log/messages journalctl ... suomi On 2015-10-05 18:29, Tero M wrote: Hi, I have CentOS 7 and I am trying to get dhclient hooks working. I have 1) created file /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enp4s0.conf, 2) created directories /etc/dhcp/{dhclient-enter-hooks.d, dhclient-exit-hooks.d}, 3) added line 'DHCLIENTARGS="-nc"' into file ifcfg-enp4s0 and 4) added file /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/test with line echo "executed enter-hook", 5) but I was not getting any output after executing ifdown enp4s0 && ifup enp4s0. However, I was able to do this with NetworkManagers dispather scripts, but I prefer old school dhclient hooks. :-) sincerely Tero M ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] BackupPC problem - wrong user
Hi Tim if you try with suexec? suomi On 2015-09-08 12:18, Timothy Murphy wrote: I recently moved BackupPC from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7. But when I browse to localhost/BackupPC I'm told Error: Wrong user: my userid is 48[apache], instead of 984(backuppc) As far as I can tell, the BackupPC settings are exactly the same as they were before the move. It seems htttpd is running the program as user apache rather than backuppc, as required. Is there a simple setting in /etc/httpd/ that will tell httpd to run as a different user? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HP Elitebook 8460p
Hi Phil I have Fedora 20, Fedora21, and Fedora 22 installed on an HP Elitebootk Folio 1040. The only problem with Fedora 22 was, that anaconda required a GPT partition table to install an UEFI system. But after having changed from MBR to GPT partition table (using gdisk), no problems any more. I can not explain why anaconda required the UEFI installation: The SD-disk on the laptop is far less then 2 Terabytes. suomi On 07/10/2015 11:34 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote: Hi, all. I'm intending to install CentOS 7 on a HP Elitebook 8460p. Does anybody have any experience of this? Many thanks for any help. Cheers, Phil... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Package group X Window System has disappeared
Try yum groupinstall Xfce or yum groupinstall MATE Desktop or yum groupinstall GNOME Desktop or yum groupinstall Server with GUI suomi On 02/27/2015 10:54 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, Until last week, I could install a CentOS 7 based desktop using the following approach: 1. Install minimal system. 2. yum groupinstall X Window System 3. yum install gdm gnome-classic-session gnome-terminal liberation-fonts 4. Install applications as needed. This morning, the package group X Window System seems to have disappeared. This is embarrassing. What happened? Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C6 server responding extremely slow on ssh interactive
Hi Patrick have you ever tried to find out on which side the hanger is: on the client's or on the server's, using tcpumg or the like? That migth help a bit further on, that might. suomi On 01/28/2015 05:41 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: Op 28-01-15 om 17:20 schreef Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: I have a C6 server acting as a kvm-host. When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for minutes at a time. Connecting to this server is not the problem. If I use: ssh root@host whatever I got immediate response even when interactive consoles opened with ssh are hanging. Sorry, is it hanging during the session or while attempting to establish a new one? If this last, it may be dns and ssh -v may help. The former is weird, I don't think I ever saw it. Marcelo Marcelo, It hangs during the session. Once I'm logged in and beginning to type it displays 3-5 chars and then hangs for up to 15 minutes, a few more chars, wait, and so on. Checked my resolv.conf; added 'options single-request-reopen' though I don't know if that is helping. Yes it is weird; even more that individual commands sent with ssh gives immediate respons. Thanks Patrick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kickstart IPv6 Gateway
Did you probably forget to provide the network prefix, when specifiying the ipv6 address? --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123/network-prefix suomi On 11/11/2014 09:44 AM, John Tall wrote: Hi. I'm installing CentOS 7 with Kickstart on a machine that has IPv6. The problem is that while it has an IPv6 address after installation it does not have the IPv6 gateway. I'm using NetworkManager and my network configuration is completely static, no autoconf or dhcpv6. My Kickstart configuration uses the following network configuration (actual values replaced but with the same format): network --device enp1s0 --bootproto=static --gateway=123.123.123.1 --ip=123.123.123.123 --nameserver=123.123.123.1 --netmask=255.255.255.0 --ipv6=2001:123:abc::123 --ipv6gateway=2001:123:abc::1 --activate network --hostname=test.example.org The Red Hat installation guide suggests that --ipv6gateway should be used but it looks like it's not picked up. Does anyone know why this doesn't work? John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos-7 reinstall
If fisxed IP Addresses are to bo set up, I usually do it in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-interfacename. This file, on a Centos 7 installation, looks like this: DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes NETBOOT=yes NM_CONTROLLED=no UUID=2c15111b-dd3d-4b31-9c5c-e01f13e36242 BOOTPROTO=static #BOOTPROTO=dhcp HWADDR=90:1b:0e:11:f9:28 TYPE=Ethernet NAME=eth0 #IPADDR=192.168.97.67 IPADDR=212.90.206.131 #NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETMASK=255.255.255.224 MTU=1450 #GATEWAY=192.168.97.2 GATEWAY=212.90.206.129 # IPV6INIT=yes # global scope IPV6ADDR=2002:d45a:ce86::163/64 # site scope IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=fec0::240:5ff:fe51:d92d/64 if you do changes in this file, you have to ifdown interfacename ifup interfacename in order to activate them. suomi On 2014-11-05 17:10, James B. Byrne wrote: I have a test system that I am using to investigate CentOS-7. I note the following difficulty when booting from the Minimal Install DVD. Neither on the initial install nor on subsequent attempts at re-installing CentOS-7 can I set the IPv4 interface to a static IP address. I can configure it but I cannot save the changes. The save button remains greyed out. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7: need authconfig against LDAP
On 2014-08-29 08:37, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, On a C6 box, when I want to enable LDAP authentication, I issue: # yum -y install nss-pam-ldapd pam_ldap nscd # authconfig --enableldap --enableldapauth --enablemkhomedir \ --ldapserver=ldap://ldap-blabla/ \ --ldapbasedn=blabla \ --enablecache --disablefingerprint \ --kickstart --update All is working fine, the directory structure is fine and compliant. What about C7? As far as I read, - there is a switch to sssd - I found 1 link: http://www.certdepot.net/ldap-client-configuration-authconfig/ Is there something in particular I should pay attention for? Note that I have only GUI-less servers. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos sssd is a hard peace to configure. In C7 it wants absolutely to have an encrypted connection to the LDAP server. Therefore, it must at least have a valid CAcert at disposition. Also, the LDAP server itself must have a valid CAcert (eventually the same as the sssd client) and a valid server-certificate with the Common-Name of the host it runs on. Follows our /etc/sssd/sssd.conf: [domain/default] autofs_provider = ldap cache_credentials = True ldap_search_base = ou=pam-ldap,dc=mydomain,dc=com ldap_user_search_base = ou=people,ou=pam-ldap,dc=mydomain,dc=com ldap_group_search_base = ou=group,ou=pam-ldap,dc=mydomain,dc=com ldap_default_bind_dn = cn=pam-ldap-checker,ou=pam-ldap,dc=mydomain,dc=com ldap_default_authtok = cache_credentials = true enumerate = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = ldap chpass_provider = ldap ldap_uri = ldap://casablanca.lan/ ldap_id_use_start_tls = True ldap_tls_cacertdir = /etc/openldap/cacerts [sssd] services = nss, pam, autofs config_file_version = 2 domains = default [nss] [pam] [sudo] [autofs] [ssh] [pac] --- In the /etc/nsswitch.conf you must have: . passwd: files sss shadow: files sss group: files sss . --- sssd, in our config, logs into the /var/log/daemonlog --- you must have authconfig set-up as you said in your message. --- In case you see just Unable to establish TLS connection with the LDAP server from sssd then you may be better off to start sssd in debug mode: sssd -d0x777 -i In this debug you search for Starting TLS. Wishing you good luck suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dual boot with 2 drives
I have a desktop with two disks, both wich Centos 7 backing up each other. Both disks have Grub2 in the MBR. On the first disk, in the Grub2 Menu /boot/grub2/grub.conf, I added a menuentry to chainload the second disk. This chainloader menuentry looks like: menuentry '3boot via chainloader from lower disk' { set root='hd1' chainloader +1 } This way I can boot the 2nd disk from the 1st one, and I don't need to change boot preferences in the BIOS. suomi On 2014-08-09 12:23, Alan McRae wrote: No problems Joe. I have done this multiple times. I assume you have Fedora 20 on sda (the first disk) with the bootloader (grub2) on sda. Your BIOS will be set to boot sda. You install CentOS 7 on sdb (obvious). Your options are with the bootloader (grub2). If you install the bootloader on sdb the two systems will remain separate. You will have to change the BIOS to boot either sda (F20) or sdb (C7). The way I prefer would be to install the new bootloader on sda (overwriting the current configuration). Your BIOS will still boot sda which will take you into the grub2 menus which will show both Fedora 20 and CentOS 7. You need to be aware that in the above configuration sda will boot into /boot on sdb (C7) which will have the dual boot menus. Don't wreck this directory or you won't be able to boot F20 (easily). The F20 and C7 installers are very good. They scan the disks for linux and Windows installations and add them into the boot menu for you. I have a laptop which boots C7, C6, F20, XP and 3 versions of Android using grub2. Alan On 09/08/2014 17:02, Ted Miller wrote: On 07/31/2014 11:37 AM, Joseph Hesse wrote: Hi, I have a laptop with 2 hard drives. The first has Fedora 20 (no windows or anything else) and the second is unused. I would like to install CentOS7 on the unused drive so I can dual boot with the choice of the 2 OS's on the Grub menu. I am comfortable in partitioning drives and installing Linux distributions. I am afraid I may mess up the MBR and/or set up Grub incorrectly so I lose everything. Please point me to some documentation to help me. Thank you, Joe I see no answers to this, so I will tell you this: If you have a CD (or USB drive) with the Super Grub Disk from www.supergrubdisk.org, you will be able to get to your linux installations no matter how badly you mess up you MBR. It is usually quite difficult to cut yourself off from an existing installation, because usually the new install process will find the old installation and include it on the new menu. Ted Miller ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] freebsd hangs when install on centos6.5
Hi I took the following note when installng freeBSD on VirtualBox: Installation in VirtualBox: from http://www.freebsd.org/ get a boot-install CDROM and burn it to a disk, because mounting the ISO file at installation-start does not work with freeBSD, you get a kernel-panic immediately. As installation source give one of the freebsd.org webs, Also, it is useless to copy an entire distribution to a local disk, using this as installation source woun't work either. Possibly it may help you also on kvm. suomi On 2014-05-27 08:31, Jarod. w wrote: Hi, All The freebsd(version: 10.0, RC3) can't be installed as kvm guest based on CentOS 6.5(kernel: kernel-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64, qemu-kvm: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2 -2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64). When installing it, it always shows 'booting' and hangs. My cpumemory information: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz Mem: 132189664 My qemu-kvm command: /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -name testbsd -M rhel6.5.0 -enable-kvm -m 2048 -realtime mlock=off -smp 4,sockets=4,cores=1,threads=1 -uuid 7f68743b-d725-4c7d-dc7e-9aa6712584b3 -drive file=/home/vAPV/test.img,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0,format=qcow2,cache=none -vnc 0.0.0.0:0 -device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 --cdrom /home/downloads/FreeBSD-10.0-RC3-amd64-dvd1.iso Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vi : unable to copy text to other file
Mount the remote file system using sshfs suomi On 2014-05-15 13:15, Johan Vermeulen wrote: Hello All, I'm trying to use vi commands instead of using the mouse. I open Gnome-Terminal I open a file : vi /home/jvermeulen/.ssh/id_dsa.pub I select the key with V ( visual line ) I type y to yank the selected line. I can now use :e otherfile.txt and paste the text in otherfile.txt This is the only way I succeed in copying text to another file in Gnome-Terminal of xterm. But how can I copy text to a file on a remote machine? Many thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KVM and Win7-64 Sound
I can only support what Arun said. suomi On 2014-02-25 16:01, david wrote: At 11:35 PM 2/24/2014, Arun Khan wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:40 AM, david da...@daku.org wrote: Sound does not work in the Windows 7 (64-bit) PRO installation as a Virtual Machine, and I have tried specifying the emulated hardware as AC97, and ICH6. The few times I have tried desktop VM with LKVM, the user experience within the VM, has been spotty. Whereas with VB it has been acceptable (same no. of CPUs, RAM etc in LKVM v/s VB). For desktop VM, I would suggest Virtual Box. Thanks for that pointer, Arun. I was about to try VB to see how it behaved, and am encouraged by your implication of success. David Kurn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] virtualisation
virtualbox? suomi On 2014-02-03 22:31, Ridhwaan Mayet wrote: Hi, I run a small company and I would like to virtualise our setup. My internet provider offers a cloud server running CentOS. The server is managed by vmware software, they haven't been able to tell me exactly what. I wanted to know is it possible to virtualise such a setup, and Have CentOS running as the virtual OS that every client sees. Is there a solution similar to vmware view + client for CentOS servers? Regards, Ridhwaan Mayet CEO Mayet Economics T +27 11 728 2468 M +27 76 805 1157 F +27 86 552 6267 E ridhw...@mayeteconomics.com W www.mayeteconomics.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin we use here LDAP authentication and mail-control since more than 10 years. At that time, we did the conversion from passwd/shadow to LDAP using the tools on http://www.padl.com/download/ which are still available, probably in a newer version... To represent a person or a service in LDAP we use the objectclasses: objectClass: account objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: top objectClass: shadowAccount objectClass: mailRecipient To represent a mail user for postfix we use the objectlcasses: objectClass: top objectClass: person objectClass: organizationalPerson objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: qmailUser To represent a Domain which we serve mail-wise we use the objectclasses: objectClass: qmailControl objectClass: top We also have developed an LDAP via Web Interface, which we use exclusively for LDAP administration. We have two LDAP servers, syncronized via syncrepl. suomi On 2014-01-28 10:02, Sorin Srbu wrote: Hi all, We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to login on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/ I've looked a bit into central login systems for linux, and NIS and LDAP seem to be prevalent. NIS being the simpler-to-setup solution for small to medium networks as I understand it, while LDAP is the more modern and scalable solution. See eg http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/NIS.html or http://sysadmin-notepad.blogspot.se/2013/06/nis-server-setup-on-rhelcentos.html. NIS-wise, what is a small to medium network? We have currently about 20-30'ish linux clients and servers, and the environment is not likely to increase much beyond this point. Is a 30ish-computer setup, a small network? The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me to keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to administrate. NIS seems to be able to do that. Comments and insights are much appreciated! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin of course: you may omit the mail cocacho and realize only the authentication cocacho in LDAP. For us, however, it has proven to be most advantageous to have both on LDAP. You may also select to do first the authentication in LDAP and later on, if you are familiar with LDAP, realize the mail. suomi On 2014-01-28 13:32, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of anax Sent: den 28 januari 2014 12:24 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? Hi Sorin we use here LDAP authentication and mail-control since more than 10 years. At that time, we did the conversion from passwd/shadow to LDAP using the tools on http://www.padl.com/download/ which are still available, probably in a newer version... To represent a person or a service in LDAP we use the objectclasses: objectClass: account objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: top objectClass: shadowAccount objectClass: mailRecipient To represent a mail user for postfix we use the objectlcasses: objectClass: top objectClass: person objectClass: organizationalPerson objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: qmailUser To represent a Domain which we serve mail-wise we use the objectclasses: objectClass: qmailControl objectClass: top We also have developed an LDAP via Web Interface, which we use exclusively for LDAP administration. We have two LDAP servers, syncronized via syncrepl. suomi On 2014-01-28 10:02, Sorin Srbu wrote: The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me to keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to administrate. NIS seems to be able to do that. Thank you. Can I use just the user authentication (uid/pwd) part and skip the whole mail-cocacho, or do these two go hand in hand when using LDAP? -- //Sorin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to find unknown ip address?
tcpdump On 2013-05-28 07:03, hadi motamedi wrote: Dear All On my network, there is a node with unknown ip address so I do not know about its range and it can be any of the range xx.xx.xx.xx . Is there any tool on my centos server to find this unknown ip address (irrespective of the range of my centos server self ip range) ? Thank you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7291 http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html might probably help you suomi On 2013-05-01 22:05, Michael Mol wrote: I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers. A rough diagram of the network layout: ISP1 router (blackbox, routes subnet A, address on subnet A) \ ---eth0(firewall)eth1---((servers)) / ISP2 router (blackbox, routes subnet B, address on subnet B) The aim is to allow the servers to use both subnet A and subnet B. To allow this, any machine on both subnets must have source-specific routing configured, else packets originating from one ISP's AS will be directed at the other's router, and neither ISP cares for that. At the moment, I'm focusing on getting the second ISP properly added to the firewall box. The firewall box is using CentOS 6.4, and normally passes traffic back and forth via proxy_arp. None of my interfaces are NM_CONTROLLED, and NetworkManager is not installed, much less started. I've created a route-eth0:1 file that looks roughly like this: 10.0.0.1 dev eth0:1 \ src 10.0.0.2 \ from 10.0.0.0/29 default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0:1 \ src 10.0.0.2 \ from 10.0.0.0/29 (Treat indented lines as continuations of the previous line) (No, the ISPs aren't giving me RFC1918 addresses; these are redacted.) If I run ifup eth0:1, ip route show includes the lines: 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 scope link src 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.0/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.2 default via 10.0.0.1 dev eth0 Note that the from 10.0.0.0/29 clause is missing. With the addition of a second default route on my firewall/gateway without any restriction on which traffic should go that way, my whole network, of course, tanks. I'm surprised it's been such a pain; I would have expected it to be a relatively common configuration. What's the proper way of doing source-specific routing on CentOS? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Computer doesn't boot with new 6.4 kernel
Hi Markus could probably the legacy vga kernel parameter help you? or is the frame-buffer mode no longer used by up-to-date boot processes? vga = 791 : 1024x768@64K means: screen resolution 1024x768 pixels with 64K colors vga = 788 : 800x600@64K means: screen resolution 800x600 pixels with 64K colors suomi On 2013-03-28 08:55, Markus Lindholm wrote: On 28 March 2013 08:42, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static, and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots fine. The motherboard is a Asus E45M1-M Pro. There's no separate graphics card, but I use the one on the motherboard, a AMD Radeon HD 6320. Should I file bug report or is there something else to try? /Markus What graphics driver are you using? It may not be compatible with the version of Xorg in 6.4. I've never used any special graphics driver on this machine. Just plain vanilla what came with the distro. /Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] proftp drives me crazy ....
The shell of the approp user not defined in /etc/shells? The user in /etc/ftpusers to deny access? The ftp server not started? ... suomi On 2012-08-21 11:29, Götz Reinicke wrote: Hi, I installed proftpd from Centos repository to my Centos 6.3 server. Iptables and selinux are off; I do have one unix user which can ssh and login to the server. I do use the default config and cant login to the ftp server (home directory of that user is all I want) :/ I use filezilla and Mac OS X native ftp access, both fails with incorrect login (530) WTF can be wrong? Or what may I have to change? Thanks for any hints and suggestions! Regards . Götz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Need help configuring wireless NIC
Hi Marko if your WLAN interface does not show up in ifconfig or in ls -l /sys/class/net/ then - your system recognizes that it has to load the modules you mention when you plug in your WLAN interface - but the modules are incapable to install the interface correctly if you say you cannot bring to work ndiswrapper because its compilation fails, then you are in bad luck. I once had a similar problem with a D-Link card (featuring the adx TI-chip). What I did: I waited until a new version of ndiswrapper was available, compiled this one, and off I went. suomi On 03/27/2012 08:46 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Tuesday, 27. March 2012. 10.02.25 Arun Khan wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Marko Vojinovicvvma...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday I managed to find a driver for my USB wireless dongle, and it is now correctly recognized by the kernel. However, I don't know how to configure it. How did you install the driver that you found? Basically, I did this (following the advice of Ned Slider, from another thread): # yum --enablerepo=elrepo-testing kmod-compat-wireless # modprobe usb8xxx Namely, on the http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-compat-wireless there is a list of drivers corresponding to various devices. My device is # lsusb Bus 001 Device 006: ID 1286:1fab Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. 88W8338 [Libertas] 802.11g so I did a search on the site for 1286 and found two relevant modules, usb8xxx and libertas. Modprobe-ing usb8xxx loads the following: # lsmod Module Size Used by usb8xxx13926 0 libertas 105931 1 usb8xxx libertas_tf12514 0 mac80211 234108 1 libertas_tf cfg80211 164625 2 libertas,mac80211 rfkill 15242 1 cfg80211 compat 16607 2 mac80211,cfg80211 lib802114194 1 libertas When I plug in the device, /var/log/messages says: Mar 27 08:10:30 CicaMaca kernel: usb 1-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7 Mar 27 08:10:31 CicaMaca kernel: usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=1286, idProduct=1fab Mar 27 08:10:31 CicaMaca kernel: usb 1-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 Mar 27 08:10:31 CicaMaca kernel: usb 1-2: Product: 54M USB Wireless NIC Mar 27 08:10:31 CicaMaca kernel: usb 1-2: Manufacturer: Tenda.. Mar 27 08:10:31 CicaMaca kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice which is basically the same information as found in dmesg. The device is correctly recognized, as far as it goes. What is the output of /sbin/ifconfig -a does it list the wifi device i.e. wlan0 ? No, ifconfig lists only my two wired ethernet devices (eth0, eth1), and the openvpn virtual ethernet device (tap0). No mention of anything wireless. Do ethtool --driveriface to find the driver associated with your wifi network interface. What shouldiface be? There isn't one associated to the wireless NIC, or I am unable to find it. I tried the following methods: # ifconfig -a # lshw -C network # rfkill list # iwconfig None of these report anything except my three wired devices (if at all). I vaguely understand that all these utilities are querrying the kernel for the info about hardware, but the kernel does not seem to be exposing it (or requires some non-automatic initialization). I tried looking at various places under /proc (to see if I can read something manually), but I found nothing, and TBH I don't quite know where to look. Usuall the NetworkManager detects all the active network interfaces and presents the devices. In your case, I suspect the wifi device is not being initialized. The NetworkManager does indeed give some indication that there is a wireless device, but it doesn't tell much. When I do a service NetworkManager restart, this is the only relevant thing I recognized about wireless from /var/log/messages: Mar 27 08:24:24 CicaMaca NetworkManager[30454]:info WiFi enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Mar 27 08:24:24 CicaMaca NetworkManager[30454]:info WWAN enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Mar 27 08:24:24 CicaMaca NetworkManager[30454]:info WiMAX enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Mar 27 08:24:24 CicaMaca NetworkManager[30454]:info Networking is enabled by state file Everything else is about eth0, eth1 and tap0 devices. I can provide full logs if you think I missed something. I am almost out of patience with this, and I'm already considering buying another wireless card, or rather a wireless router which can act as a client to another wireless router, so that I can connect the computer via wired ethernet. I'd prefer not to waste any money on this, especially if it is just a software configuration issue, but I also need the damn thing to start working sooner than later. Btw, the device is working properly under Windows, and it used to work properly under Linux with ndiswrapper.
Re: [CentOS] php-pear problem on yum update
Hi Nikos you say, you don't use php-pear. Just remove it. yum remove php-pear yum upgrade suomi On 03/09/2012 10:16 AM, Nikos Gatsis - Qbit wrote: Hello list I have centos-release-5-7.el5.centos and today I noticed that there are some updates with yum. I try to update but something hapend with php-pear: file /usr/share/pear/.channels/__uri.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from pa ckage php-pear-ole-0.5-2.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pear.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-ole-0.5-2.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pecl.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-ole-0.5-2.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.depdb from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from package php-pea r-ole-0.5-2.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/__uri.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from pa ckage php-pear-excel-0.9.0-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pear.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-excel-0.9.0-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pecl.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-excel-0.9.0-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.depdb from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from package php-pea r-excel-0.9.0-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/__uri.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from pa ckage php-pear-log-1.9.3-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pear.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-log-1.9.3-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pecl.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-log-1.9.3-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.depdb from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from package php-pea r-log-1.9.3-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/__uri.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from pa ckage php-pear-mail_mime-1.3.1-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pear.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-mail_mime-1.3.1-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.channels/pecl.php.net.reg from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with filefrom package php-pear-mail_mime-1.3.1-1.el5.rf.noarch file /usr/share/pear/.depdb from install of php-pear-1.4.9-8.el5.noarch conflicts with file from package php-pea r-mail_mime-1.3.1-1.el5.rf.noarch I have never Install a package out of yum so this conflict is very strange to me. I try to clean up yum, and update with --skip-broken with no luck. Is good to install php packages excluding php-pear? Actually I dont use it. Can somebody advice me? Thank you in advance ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.2 install some problems
For the first: try yum groupremove ... for eth try ifconfig ... ip... suomi On 02/28/2012 12:42 PM, admin lewis wrote: Hi, I have reinstalled centos 6.2 x86_64 because it seems there is not xfs mod on i386. But i have found an orther problem. After the partitioning there is not any prompt to choice the type of server I want (minimal, web etc) So now I have a desktop installation... I want to remove xorg, gnome etc.. and an other bug.. i am unable to setup Eth interface ... with system-config-network-tui i cant see any eth.. I have 4 NIC.. and all works well.. cheers luigi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dovecot problems
did you try doveconf -n -c dovecot.old.conf dovecot.new.conf we also use dovecot for POP as well as IMAP. we are using the maildir storage for mails (one file per one mail). no problem sofar (touch wood). suomi On 02/13/2012 01:35 PM, Steve Campbell wrote: On 2/12/2012 2:09 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: Am 12.02.2012 20:01, schrieb Steve Campbell: Actually, I'm having problems with pop and imap. I changed mailservers this weekend, going from a Centos 3 box to a Centos 6 box. The Centos 3 box used the old standard imap and pop servers. We use horde for our webmail. The pop3 mailboxes (mbox) were in /var/spool/mail and the imap folders were in /home/user/mail, which horde took care of. So 2 classes of users? As John has annotated, mixing POP3 and IMP4 use is not advised at all. Not really two classes of users. Most of the users use pop for retrieving email. Horde is our webmail app, and it reads the mailbox, but creates and manages the imap folders in user's home directory. This has worked fine in the past, allowing users to read mail from their desktop using pop, and if desired, using horde to read mail from elsewhere. If they want to be able to see read email from outside the building, they set their mail client to leave on server. Horde takes care of deleting email from the mbox as well if desired. Upon starting the Centos 6 box, I ran into tons of login and viewing problems. I tried Cyrus for imap, could log in, but couldn't see mail in the imap folders. Using dovecot for pop, I eventually could get logged in, but kept getting the couldn't open INBOX message, so no one could download their email, even though sendmail was delivering it properly. Cyrus-IMAPd is out of the game unless you do a real mail store migration as Cyrus-IMAPd uses his own storage scheme. My preference is to use dovecot as both pop and imap servers. The Centos 3 imap server used an rpm named imap-2002d-12 (at least that's the one I have on that server). I'm not sure how mixing comes into play here, since most people set their smart phones up as imap clients, and they can still view their email when they arrive at work using pop. So here's my question: Can (should) dovecot be used for both imap and pop when considering the above setup of mbox in /var/spool/mail and imap folders in ~/mail? Horde will read the mbox to display new messages in it's screens. Yes. That's good to get an opinion. I'm going to proceed thinking dovecot will do both. There's also an issue to address later of shared stuff I'll have to investigate. We have a few accounts that multiple users use in this manner through imap. They log in as a singular user, but there are issues of deletions and the like that sometimes cause problems. If so, does anyone have a pretty good link to how to make dovecot function using the old Centos pop/imap scheme? Should I try and convert the old mbox files to another format or destination to make this work? See http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation I reviewed that quite a bit during the night. I guess I need to read up on dovecot's definitions, since that INBOX parameter kept throwing me. There really isn't an INBOX to a pop account's mbox, but there is on our imap scheme. So I might have been trying to force the issue. Thanks for any help. It's been a long night, going on about 14 hours now and I'm just getting the old server back to current until I figure this out. Not intended to sound smart ass, but changing a production system the way you do without prior testing isn't that clever. Not taken in any bad way. I had actually tested it pretty well for all the stuff I'm running on it. Sendmail worked as expected. All of the other apps I have running dealing with email worked fine as well. Apps such as MimeDefang, MailScanner, MailWatch, and everything else. I took for granted that pop and imap would work fine since on the old system, they just worked. I had no idea these services had changed so much. So yes, I failed to test the two things that users want most. Egg on my face, for sure. Thanks for the help, and criticism. steve campbell I wish you success. Thanks. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to find source of data loss / corruption
Hi Rudi we once had a similar problem on a Web: This Web had this in particular that its home-page needed to be deleted daily and of course reinstalled immediately. Then, in a new version of the Web it did not need this delete/reinstall cycle any more, so the webadmin just removed the link to the delete script. He did not remove the delete-script itself from the Web. The effect was, that the home-page was still deleted at random times. What we then found out: We used an internal Search-Engine which crawled this web. And this Search-Engine had not forgotten the link to the delete-script, but invoked it at random times, whenever it crawled the particular Web. Your case: could it be something similar? suomi On 2011-12-15 11:28, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi, 2 websites, hosted on 2 different CentOS 5.7 servers (one being very new, about 3 weeks old) keeps loosing data - but it's more like it's corrupted than being deleted. For example, a photo would be uploaded last night and today when we checked it, it doesn't show on the website. So we check if the file is on the server, and exists but is 0KB in size. Last night it still worked fine. The photo is 482Kb in size. The first time this happened we thought it was due to a bug with CentOS 5.7 + EXT4 + quotas (there's a bug open for this) and since the server's console kept giving errors about possible data corruption we thought it would be best if we move everything to a more stable platform. So we brought a new server, setup CentOS 5.7 + ext3 + quotas (which has been working fine on all our servers for a long time) and moved the data across. A few days down the line and I still see this happening. I'm out of ideas and hope someone could shed some light on the matter. I've checked some suggested search results, but couldn't find any issues with the HDD according to SMART. The servers' both have 4GB RAM and 8Core CPU's.Neither RAM, nor CPU usage is high. Both are setup with RAID10 across 4 entrerprise HDD's, one server has software RAID and the new one hardware RAID. So even when we changed the RAID subsystem it still happens. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problems with kickstart installation into a Virtualbox
Hi listers i tried to kickstart-install CentOS 6.0 64 in a Virtualbox (Virtualbox Version 4.12). I used a local CDROM with the net-install ISO on it to boot from. The ISO distribution file was provided on a server in the LAN as was the kickstart file. When starting the installation i aded the following to the kernel line of the grub menu: ks=http://install.mydomain.com/ks/centos.6.64.cfg After i had corrected some errors in the kickstart file, the installation started as expected. But it did not terminate as expected: after installing 198 of 671 packages, the installation halted with an error (i.e. after installing the package libutempter). In order to see what the problem was, i restarted from the CDROM in recovery mode, and after going into the half-way installed system, i saw in the anaconda log that about three quarters of the post-installation scripts of the packages had returned a warning. The warning code was 255. But the post-installation script of the package libutempter had returned an error with code 255, whereupon the installation stopped. I thought, OK, we will work around the libutempter package by selecting other program-groups in the kickstart-file. But i had no luck: the installation stopped then after the package MAKEDEV. Then i left off kickstart-installation and did a standard installation booting from the CDROM and getting the default packages from the server in the LAN. This worked fine. - When it came to test the installed packages i was always lucky except with the package fuse (fuse-2.8.3-1.el6.x86_64) which contains the binary /usr/bin/fusermount. This binary was installed without execute permission for everybody, so it could be invoked only by the userid root and members of the group fuse, which is not, what i had expected. suomi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problems with kickstart installation into a Virtualbox
Hi John thanks for the immediate information. suomi On 2011-08-25 11:51, John Hodrien wrote: On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, anax wrote: Hi listers i tried to kickstart-install CentOS 6.0 64 in a Virtualbox (Virtualbox Version 4.12). I used a local CDROM with the net-install ISO on it to boot from. The ISO distribution file was provided on a server in the LAN as was the kickstart file. When starting the installation i aded the following to the kernel line of the grub menu: ks=http://install.mydomain.com/ks/centos.6.64.cfg After i had corrected some errors in the kickstart file, the installation started as expected. But it did not terminate as expected: after installing 198 of 671 packages, the installation halted with an error (i.e. after installing the package libutempter). In order to see what the problem was, i restarted from the CDROM in recovery mode, and after going into the half-way installed system, i saw in the anaconda log that about three quarters of the post-installation scripts of the packages had returned a warning. The warning code was 255. But the post-installation script of the package libutempter had returned an error with code 255, whereupon the installation stopped. I thought, OK, we will work around the libutempter package by selecting other program-groups in the kickstart-file. But i had no luck: the installation stopped then after the package MAKEDEV. This is a known bug of CentOS 6.0. Redo the install without including the updates repo in your kickstart file, and you'll find it installs fine. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos