Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-29 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 28.10.2012 18:30, schrieb Bob Puff:
 One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
 though it really -was- full.  Use mii-tool to find out.

That's the typical effect when one side is configured
to full duplex and the other side to auto negotiate.
The side with the fixed configuration will not reply to
the negotiation packets, whereupon the other side will
fall back to half duplex.

-- 
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-29 Thread Jerry Geis
 ck your duplex.  I have had two recent problems with duplex:

 One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
 though it really -was- full.  Use mii-tool to find out.

 Two, with a RR modem - the speed was forced to 10mb half duplex instead of
 100mb full duplex.  All sorts of strange loss.  Once I put it back, all was 
 well.

 I have used TONs of 8139s, and while I do see where they are not the fastest
 kid on the block, I cannot say I've seen packet loss.

 Bob

Bob - thanks,

I found this article:
http://www.appliedtrust.com/resources/performance/untangling-ethernet-performance-problems

my devices are 10/100 and auto-negotiate. I will be changing them as 
soon as I can.

jerry

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-29 Thread Giles Coochey

On 29/10/2012 13:26, Jerry Geis wrote:

ck your duplex.  I have had two recent problems with duplex:

One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
though it really -was- full.  Use mii-tool to find out.

Just a note, auto-negotiation of 10/100 links will not work reliably 
unless both sides of the link are set to auto-negotiate.


If one side is set to 100/full, and the other side is set to auto 
negotiate, then it will try to negotiate, the side that is hard coded 
100/full will _NOT_ negotiate and negotiation will fail, the side that 
was set to auto negotiate will fail back to a 'fail-safe' 10/half duplex 
link.


My rule of thumb, static link (e.g. those to servers, inter switch 
links, switch to router links etc...) should just be hard coded. Links 
that might have a variety of devices connected to them, e.g. the access 
layer ports - set them to auto-negotiate.


--
Regards,

Giles Coochey, CCNA, CCNAS
NetSecSpec Ltd
+44 (0) 7983 877438
http://www.coochey.net
http://www.netsecspec.co.uk
gi...@coochey.net


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-28 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, fred smith wrote:

 To: CentOS ML centos@centos.org
 From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets
 
 On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 04:40:42PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
 I have a CentOS 5.8 box that is dropping packets (just from ping).
 The network is 8139 RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ Rev 10

 Adding the parameters pci=noacpi acpi=off 
 has helped but it still happens.

 Is there something else that helps the network not drop packets?

 This probably won't be helpful, but whenever someone inquires about
 trouble with a Realtek network chipset someone ALWAYS responds that
 Realtek network hardware is junk and that you should replace it
 with something good, such as an intel e100 or e1000 or some such.

 Me, I've never had trouble with a realtek card, myself.

Me neither.

I have a RT adapter on my laptop - no problems there either.

HTH

Keith

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-28 Thread Jerry Geis
 Is there any chances you can send in the stats of the interface? Just 
 show if the driver says why it's being dropped. 

Banyan,


RX packets:2944544 errors:45 dropped:21 overruns:4

dmesg shows no errors
tail /var/log/messages shows no errors.

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-28 Thread Bob Puff
Check your duplex.  I have had two recent problems with duplex:

One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
though it really -was- full.  Use mii-tool to find out.

Two, with a RR modem - the speed was forced to 10mb half duplex instead of
100mb full duplex.  All sorts of strange loss.  Once I put it back, all was 
well.

I have used TONs of 8139s, and while I do see where they are not the fastest
kid on the block, I cannot say I've seen packet loss.

Bob

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-27 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a CentOS 5.8 box that is dropping packets (just from ping).
The network is 8139 RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ Rev 10

Adding the parameters pci=noacpi acpi=off 
has helped but it still happens.

Is there something else that helps the network not drop packets?

Thanks,

jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-27 Thread fred smith
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 04:40:42PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
 I have a CentOS 5.8 box that is dropping packets (just from ping).
 The network is 8139 RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ Rev 10
 
 Adding the parameters pci=noacpi acpi=off 
 has helped but it still happens.
 
 Is there something else that helps the network not drop packets?

This probably won't be helpful, but whenever someone inquires about
trouble with a Realtek network chipset someone ALWAYS responds that
Realtek network hardware is junk and that you should replace it
with something good, such as an intel e100 or e1000 or some such.

Me, I've never had trouble with a realtek card, myself.


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
 glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior
 be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
 all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-27 Thread Jerry Geis

 This probably won't be helpful, but whenever someone inquires about
 trouble with a Realtek network chipset someone ALWAYS responds that
 Realtek network hardware is junk and that you should replace it
 with something good, such as an intel e100 or e1000 or some such.

 Me, I've never had trouble with a realtek card, myself.

Fred - thanks - but not an option in this case. Its built in and no 
slots available.

jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-27 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/27/12 4:59 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
 This probably won't be helpful, but whenever someone inquires about
 trouble with a Realtek network chipset someone ALWAYS responds that
 Realtek network hardware is junk and that you should replace it
 with something good, such as an intel e100 or e1000 or some such.
 
 Me, I've never had trouble with a realtek card, myself.
 
 Fred - thanks - but not an option in this case. Its built in and no
 slots available.

with the newest intel desktop CPUs at least, the first ethernet 
controller is built into the southbridge (H77, Z77, etc), and if there's 
a realtek chip on there its just the 'PHY physical interface.


-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-27 Thread Banyan He
Is there any chances you can send in the stats of the interface? Just 
show if the driver says why it's being dropped.


Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com

On 2012-10-28 4:40 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
 I have a CentOS 5.8 box that is dropping packets (just from ping).
 The network is 8139 RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ Rev 10

 Adding the parameters pci=noacpi acpi=off 
 has helped but it still happens.

 Is there something else that helps the network not drop packets?

 Thanks,

 jerry
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 8139 dropping packets

2012-10-27 Thread me
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012, Jerry Geis wrote:

 I have a CentOS 5.8 box that is dropping packets (just from ping).
 The network is 8139 RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ Rev 10

 Adding the parameters pci=noacpi acpi=off 
 has helped but it still happens.

 Is there something else that helps the network not drop packets?

Upgrade to Centos 6. I have approx 20 jetway mini-itx boxes with a built
in 8139. I recently had all but 2 experience large packet loss problems.
Some of them were happily running C-5 for over 2 years. Upgrading them to C-6
solved it but I do not know why. I too would really like to understand what
is going on here.

In addition, I would like to know why I still have 2 boxes that are happily
running c-5.

I suspect that this is some kind of driver issue but I even tried upgrading
the drivers using those supplied by EL-Repo. The only thing that improved the
situation was upgrading to C-6.

FWIW, I use them as router/firewalls. They have a 3 port daughter board 
for a total of 4 Ethernet ports on them that I have recently switched to using
an Intel based chipset just as a precaution.

HTH,

-- 
Tom m...@tdiehl.org Spamtrap address
me...@tdiehl.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos