Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread Mark LaPierre

On 2020-04-12 21:49, John Pierce wrote:


It appears that they just pasted a new name on an old horse.  It's still
LDAP.



yes, its the standardized LDAP protocol...

it is, however, a completely different implementation, so no, its not
OpenLDAP, which is a specific implementation.



Oh insert Deity here!  This is going to take a semester of Computer 
Science to figure out.


dscreate create-template creates a 9K file full of mostly obscure and 
unintelligible options.


This where the hand holding I told you about comes into play.

This is what I've got so far:

config_version = 2
defaults = 9

The next option is full_machine_name which defaults to localhost.localdomain

I need to give this machine a name other than localhost.localdomain.  I 
guess that's my next bit of search engine exercise to learn how to do 
that without making a giant mess.  I remember trying to do this with the 
last attempt at LDAP a year ago.  It wasn't pretty and didn't turn out well.


I guess that's my next step for tomorrow.  I've got to go to bed if I'm 
going to be able to stay awake long enough to write any code at work 
tomorrow.


--
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread John Pierce
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:43 PM Mark LaPierre  wrote:

> On 2020-04-12 08:13, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> > On Apr 12, 2020, at 05:47, Pete Biggs  wrote:
> >> There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but
> >> LDAP is the de facto standard.
> >
> > Unfortunately,  OpenLDAP as a server is deprecated in C8, and isn’t
> packaged anymore.  Upstream they point customers to their directory
> service, which is based on 389 directory service.
> >
>
> Okay, I found
>
> https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html.
>
> Thank you for the useful reply.
>
> It appears that they just pasted a new name on an old horse.  It's still
> LDAP.
>
>
yes, its the standardized LDAP protocol...

it is, however, a completely different implementation, so no, its not
OpenLDAP, which is a specific implementation.



-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread Mark LaPierre

On 2020-04-12 08:13, Jonathan Billings wrote:

On Apr 12, 2020, at 05:47, Pete Biggs  wrote:

There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but
LDAP is the de facto standard.


Unfortunately,  OpenLDAP as a server is deprecated in C8, and isn’t packaged 
anymore.  Upstream they point customers to their directory service, which is 
based on 389 directory service.



Okay, I found

https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html.

Thank you for the useful reply.

It appears that they just pasted a new name on an old horse.  It's still 
LDAP.


I'll follow the directions there.  At least the directions say they are 
for CentOS 8.1+


I'll let you know what happens.  I hope I don't end up having to 
reinstall to fix the mess this makes.


--
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread Andreas Benzler
Dear P.,

NIS is out. Don’t ask me why. Ask the developer. 

On our cluster it is still in use, but for the next instance 
I must use LDAP or compile the packages by my self. 

Best wishes

Andy

> Am 12.04.2020 um 14:28 schrieb Pete Biggs :
> 
> On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 08:13 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 05:47, Pete Biggs  wrote:
>>> There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but
>>> LDAP is the de facto standard.
>> 
>> Unfortunately,  OpenLDAP as a server is deprecated in C8, and isn’t
>> packaged anymore.  Upstream they point customers to their directory
>> service, which is based on 389 directory service. 
>> 
>  Why on Earth is deprecated?  I suppose they want people to use
> FreeIPA, which is a bit of a steam-hammer-to-crack-wallnut type thing. 
> 
> P.
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread Pete Biggs
On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 08:13 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2020, at 05:47, Pete Biggs  wrote:
> > There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but
> > LDAP is the de facto standard.
> 
> Unfortunately,  OpenLDAP as a server is deprecated in C8, and isn’t
> packaged anymore.  Upstream they point customers to their directory
> service, which is based on 389 directory service. 
> 
 Why on Earth is deprecated?  I suppose they want people to use
FreeIPA, which is a bit of a steam-hammer-to-crack-wallnut type thing. 

P.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Apr 12, 2020, at 05:47, Pete Biggs  wrote:
> There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but
> LDAP is the de facto standard.

Unfortunately,  OpenLDAP as a server is deprecated in C8, and isn’t packaged 
anymore.  Upstream they point customers to their directory service, which is 
based on 389 directory service. 

--
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-12 Thread Pete Biggs


> Yes, let me validate Mr. Kovacs comment.  I am aware of the shortcomings 
> of NIS in the area of security.  Let me provide some information on the 
> topography of my network and my reasoning for choosing NIS/NFS.  Perhaps 
> an alternative may be suggested to meet my needs without totally 
> confounding me when it comes to configuration. 

The good thing about YP/NIS is that it's simple - if all you want is
for your clients to get user info it is ideal. Unfortunately it was
designed in a time when passwords were hard to crack and "script
kiddie" was a yet to be invented term. Some of my systems still use
NIS+. but they are isolated and legacy.


> 
> Now that I've bored you to tears, are there any suggestions as to what I 
> should use as a replacement for NIS/NFS for sharing and mounting of 
> /home directories on the other three machines on my network?  Consider 
> that you are probably going to end up holding my hand in this endeavor 
> so choose something that you would want to configure and use.
> 
I think your best bet is to see what's supported in sssd - that will at
least give you some hope of getting some level of consistency. Pick
something that takes your fancy and isn't too complex. TBH you are
probably going to settle on some implementation of LDAP - probably
OpenLDAP - yes, I know you've tried it before, but it should work.
Configuring the clients to use LDAP via SSSD is not a problem; your
issue is going to be setting up the LDAP server. It's a long time since
I've done it so I'm not a person to hand hold, but your needs are
simple and there will be plenty of tutorials and guides and how-to's
out there to step you through the process. Once the LDAP server is
setup you basically never have to touch it - all configuration is done
through processes interacting with the server, including provisioning
accounts and so on - even the initial configuration is done by talking
to the server.

There are other options than LDAP, and servers other than OpenLDAP, but
LDAP is the de facto standard.

P.





___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-11 Thread Mark LaPierre

On 2020-04-09 05:14, isdtor wrote:

Nicolas Kovacs writes:

Le 09/04/2020 à 11:05, isdtor a écrit :

NIS works fine on CentOS 8. Certainly the client side. But how it's enabled
is different, check the manual. authconfig is replaced with authselect.


NIS "works fine" in the sense that telnet works fine.

:o)


It is not our job here to second-guess implementation decisions made by others 
as only the people concerned are familiar with their environment's restraints 
and business requirements.



Yes, let me validate Mr. Kovacs comment.  I am aware of the shortcomings 
of NIS in the area of security.  Let me provide some information on the 
topography of my network and my reasoning for choosing NIS/NFS.  Perhaps 
an alternative may be suggested to meet my needs without totally 
confounding me when it comes to configuration.  I tried another solution 
some time ago but failed miserably.  Search for "nobody:nobody" in my 
transactions on this mail list from 2019/04/02.


I have a small home network, four CentOS boxes, three running CentOS 6 
at the moment.  This network is behind an ONT and an Edgerouter. 
Machine #4 is a newly constructed AMD 16 core with a set of four 2TB HDs 
that will be configured as a RAID array.  I plan to host the home 
directories of all the users on my network on the array and share them 
out to the other three machines to be auto-mounted when the user logs 
in.  I did this successfully using NIS/NFS about 20 years ago in a small 
private grade school network that I built from the scrap heap of old and 
abandoned machines, and no money, that they had on hand.


All the machines on my home network will eventually be running CentOS 8 
seeing that CentOS 6 is very near EOL.  Being that they will all be 
running the same flavor of CentOS should make configuration a bit easier.


I need a set of tools that is fairly simple to configure, by which I 
mean has complete and accurate documentation which I can find, and does 
not present impediments to future system configuration.  My hope is to 
do all the user management on the 16 core that will be hosting the raid. 
 I don't want to have to log onto all the other machines to twiddle 
bits each time I want to add a new user account.


I designed the 16 core with the intent of putting it's 
non-entertainment/educational clock cycles to work as a Monero miner.  I 
chose Monero because it is specifically resistant to ASIC implementation 
demanding excellent system CPU and GPU performance and plenty of RAM, 64 
Gb in this case.  There's no point in trying to mine Bit Coin et al. 
unless you plan to live for the 1000 years it will take to earn just one.


Now that I've bored you to tears, are there any suggestions as to what I 
should use as a replacement for NIS/NFS for sharing and mounting of 
/home directories on the other three machines on my network?  Consider 
that you are probably going to end up holding my hand in this endeavor 
so choose something that you would want to configure and use.


Choose wisely Grasshopper.

--
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-09 Thread isdtor
Nicolas Kovacs writes:
> Le 09/04/2020 à 11:05, isdtor a écrit :
> > NIS works fine on CentOS 8. Certainly the client side. But how it's enabled
> > is different, check the manual. authconfig is replaced with authselect.
> 
> NIS "works fine" in the sense that telnet works fine.
> 
> :o)

It is not our job here to second-guess implementation decisions made by others 
as only the people concerned are familiar with their environment's restraints 
and business requirements.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-09 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 09/04/2020 à 11:05, isdtor a écrit :
> NIS works fine on CentOS 8. Certainly the client side. But how it's enabled
> is different, check the manual. authconfig is replaced with authselect.

NIS "works fine" in the sense that telnet works fine.

:o)

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-09 Thread isdtor
Nicolas Kovacs writes:
> Le 09/04/2020 à 02:42, Mark LaPierre a écrit :
> > Does anyone know where I can get NIS for CentOS 8?
> 
> According to the Release Notes, NIS has been officially deprecated in CentOS 
> 8.
> 
> You might want to move to 389 Directory Server. Robust, secure and 
> well-documented.

NIS works fine on CentOS 8. Certainly the client side. But how it's enabled is 
different, check the manual. authconfig is replaced with authselect.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-09 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 09/04/2020 à 02:42, Mark LaPierre a écrit :
> Does anyone know where I can get NIS for CentOS 8?

According to the Release Notes, NIS has been officially deprecated in CentOS 8.

You might want to move to 389 Directory Server. Robust, secure and 
well-documented.

Cheers,

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site : https://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-08 Thread John Pierce
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:48 PM Warren Young  wrote:

> On Apr 8, 2020, at 6:42 PM, Mark LaPierre  wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know where I can get NIS for CentOS 8?
>
> $ dnf provides ypserv
> ...
> ypserv-4.0-6.20170331git5bfba76.el8.x86_64 : The NIS (Network Information
> Service) server
>
>
> do people really still use NIS ?!?   I mean, I remember using it in the
mid to late 90s on a network of Sun Solaris systems (after all, they
virtually invented it), but we got rid of it by the mid 2000s because its
simply not secure by any rational definition, and only really suitable on a
network where everyone trusts everything attached to the network, that
world simply doesn't exist anymore.

-- 
-john r pierce
  recycling used bits in santa cruz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-08 Thread Warren Young
On Apr 8, 2020, at 6:42 PM, Mark LaPierre  wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know where I can get NIS for CentOS 8?

$ dnf provides ypserv
...
ypserv-4.0-6.20170331git5bfba76.el8.x86_64 : The NIS (Network Information 
Service) server
Repo: AppStream
Matched from:
Provide: ypserv = 4.0-6.20170331git5bfba76.el8
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 8 NIS

2020-04-08 Thread Mark LaPierre

Hey all,

Does anyone know where I can get NIS for CentOS 8?

--
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos