[CentOS] IPv6 on CentOS-6 - IPTables

2016-03-08 Thread James B. Byrne
It appears likely that within the next two quarters we will be moving
off of our IPv4 class C's and onto a single IPv6 /40 for our sites.

We have a fairly complex IPTables setup which handles our gateways and
internal hosts.  My question is just how much effort is involved in
moving these rules from IPv4 to IPv6?  Are there elements in one that
are not available in the other?  Are there any fundamental
incompatibilites?  Does anyone have a good reference to a case history
of moving from one to the other?

Regards,

-- 
***  e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-16 Thread James Hogarth

 An update to close: it's a vmware issue:

thanks for the closure... VMware diagnosis can be a real pain...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-15 Thread Alan Batie
An update to close: it's a vmware issue:

* new centos 5 creations exhibit the same behavior
* a few months ago, we migrated from an esx 4.0 cluster to a new esx 4.1
cluster
* we've just recently started using a new centos 6 template; the centos
6 system that's working was created before the migration
* a fresh install on esxi 4.0.0 worked fine; when the vm was restarted
on the new cluster, it exhibited the same failure.  I'm hoping to get an
esx 4.0 instance running to I can try the same test, as it seems that
esx 4.0 vms will migrate properly and work.  Failing that, we can clone
the working centos 6 system for now until we can work with vmware to
figure out what's going on...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread Alan Batie
On 8/11/12 2:17 AM, James Hogarth wrote:

 With ipv6 in the picture stop using net-tools - they were deprecated a long
 time ago and there's multiple edge cases and bugs where they don't work
 properly or lack features... learn to use the iproute2 toolset - ip, ss and
 tc being the key ones.

Love gratuitous changes to long standard toolsets... sigh...

 And it's ip -6 route not ip -6 router... or ip -6 r s in short ;-)

You're right, sorry, it was late on Friday ;-)

centos666.peak.org [50] # ip -6 r
unreachable ::/96 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436 advmss 16376
hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable :::0.0.0.0/96 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 2002:a00::/24 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 2002:7f00::/24 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 2002:a9fe::/32 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 2002:ac10::/28 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 2002:c0a8::/32 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 2002:e000::/19 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
2607:f678::/64 dev eth0  proto kernel  metric 256  mtu 1500 advmss 1440
hoplimit 4294967295
unreachable 3ffe:::/32 dev lo  metric 1024  error -101 mtu 16436
advmss 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
fe80::/64 dev eth0  proto kernel  metric 256  mtu 1500 advmss 1440
hoplimit 4294967295
default via 2607:f678::1 dev eth0  metric 1  mtu 1500 advmss 1440
hoplimit 4294967295

Also love quality error messages -101 is *sooo* informative ;-)

But the last line should be the important one and shows the proper
default route in place, though the even more important one is the route
to the local net (2607:f678::/64) which also looks right.  It's not a
routing issue, it's a neighbor discovery issue:

centos666.peak.org [55] # ip neigh show
2607:f678::1 dev eth0  FAILED
207.55.16.1 dev eth0 lladdr 00:26:88:f2:9e:80 REACHABLE

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread James Hogarth

 Love gratuitous changes to long standard toolsets... sigh...


It's not a recent change and is far from gratuitous

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00780.html

Features such as traffic shaping, policy routing and multiple IPs on
an interface (not virtual interfaces) either are impossible with
net-tools or just don't work very well...


 Also love quality error messages -101 is *sooo* informative ;-)

 But the last line should be the important one and shows the proper
 default route in place, though the even more important one is the route
 to the local net (2607:f678::/64) which also looks right.  It's not a
 routing issue, it's a neighbor discovery issue:

 centos666.peak.org [55] # ip neigh show
 2607:f678::1 dev eth0  FAILED
 207.55.16.1 dev eth0 lladdr 00:26:88:f2:9e:80 REACHABLE


Are you allowing ICMPv6? I don't just mean echo and echo-reply (the
pings above) but most of the rest of it too?

IPv6 relies on ICMPv6 heavily for path MTU discovery, neighbour
discovery and a whole lot more...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread Alan Batie
On 8/13/12 12:00 PM, James Hogarth wrote:

 Are you allowing ICMPv6? I don't just mean echo and echo-reply (the
 pings above) but most of the rest of it too?

Yes, the test system has the default ip6tables, but we always permit icmp:

# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
# Manual customization of this file is not recommended.
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p ipv6-icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp6-adm-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp6-adm-prohibited
COMMIT

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread James Hogarth

 Yes, the test system has the default ip6tables, but we always permit icmp:


Hmm this is especially weird given the 5.8 systems are working -
otherwise I'd have moved the troubleshooting up to vmware or the
switch next...

Without access to the machines/switches to traffic dump and check in
wireshark you've got me stumped at this point I'm afraid...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread Alan Batie
I found another CentOS 6 system that not only is talking ipv6 properly,
but the test system that can't even talk to the router can talk to it.
That indicates it's probably something wonky with the network itself...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread James Hogarth
On 13 August 2012 20:37, Alan Batie a...@peak.org wrote:
 I found another CentOS 6 system that not only is talking ipv6 properly,
 but the test system that can't even talk to the router can talk to it.
 That indicates it's probably something wonky with the network itself...


Hmm...


I don't have a C6 ipv6 machine but I do have a F17 which might not be
too far off in behaviour...

The general recommendation though is that next hop should always be
via the local link FE80:: addresses (I notice your public address for
gateway there)...

Don't worry about the error -101 - the actual error is the unreachable
bit and just says that those networks can't be reached over the lo
device - which is understandable...

Here's a look at my F17 server for comparison:


ip -6 r s
2001:0:4137:9e76:24f8:3b1a:2598:7928 via fe80::e291:f5ff:fecc:7919 dev
em1  metric 0
cache
2001:0:9d38:953c:2805:3e4f:484e:6234 via fe80::e291:f5ff:fecc:7919 dev
em1  metric 0
cache
2001:0:9d38:953c:344a:332e:37f7:24f7 via fe80::e291:f5ff:fecc:7919 dev
em1  metric 0
cache
2001:470:97df:1::/64 dev em1  proto kernel  metric 256  expires 85879sec
unreachable fe80::/64 dev lo  proto kernel  metric 256  error -101
fe80::/64 dev em1  proto kernel  metric 256
default via fe80::e291:f5ff:fecc:7919 dev em1  proto kernel  metric
1024  expires 1305sec

I'm using radvd on my network ... but things shouldn't be too far off
for static settings...

Is the other C6 system that *is* working on the same vmware server,
bare metal or on another virtualization server?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread Alan Batie
On 8/13/12 12:35 PM, James Hogarth wrote:

 Hmm this is especially weird given the 5.8 systems are working -
 otherwise I'd have moved the troubleshooting up to vmware or the
 switch next...

Migrating one of the vms to the same physical host made them start
talking to each other, so it's definitely a vmware issue, though why
it's interacting badly with centos 6 is a good question.  It could be a
bug in vmware tools/the ethernet driver.  At least it's narrowed down now...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-13 Thread Stephen Harris
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:46:44PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
 it's interacting badly with centos 6 is a good question.  It could be a
 bug in vmware tools/the ethernet driver.  At least it's narrowed down now...

Are you using vmxnet3 drivers?  That had a known bug with small udp
packets, but it should be fixed.   Maybe you're seeing a similar issue.
Try using the e1000 driver in that case.

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/solutions/67823

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-11 Thread James Hogarth
On Aug 11, 2012 2:00 AM, Alan Batie a...@peak.org wrote:

 On 8/10/12 5:50 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
  On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
  IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
 
  Not sure where you get that from.

 That's not something normally in our configs, I think it was in the
 default config the centos 6 installer created, and I only stripped out
 some of the excess... stuff like that I left in in case it mattered in 6
 for some reason...  The config on the working centos 5 systems (which is
 what we use on the centos 6 systems also) is much simpler:

 ns6.peak.org [113] # cat /etc/sysconfig/network
 NETWORKING=yes
 NETWORKING_IPV6=yes
 HOSTNAME=ns6.peak.org
 GATEWAY=207.55.16.1
 ns6.peak.org [114] # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
 DEVICE=eth0
 BOOTPROTO=static
 BROADCAST=207.55.19.255
 IPADDR=207.55.16.53
 NETMASK=255.255.252.0
 ONBOOT=yes
 TYPE=Ethernet


 netstat is the one I usually use:

 centos666.peak.org [39] # ip -6 router
 Object router is unknown, try ip help.
 centos666.peak.org [40] # netstat -rn -A inet6

With ipv6 in the picture stop using net-tools - they were deprecated a long
time ago and there's multiple edge cases and bugs where they don't work
properly or lack features... learn to use the iproute2 toolset - ip, ss and
tc being the key ones.

And it's ip -6 route not ip -6 router... or ip -6 r s in short ;-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-11 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 8/11/12, Alan Batie a...@peak.org wrote:
 We've been running ipv6 for a year or so now, but some of our newer
 instances (all on an ESX cluster) are not working.  It looks like it's
 all of our Centos 6 instances.  I'm hoping someone can point me in the
 right direction...

 centos666.peak.org [27] # cat ifcfg-eth0
 DEVICE=eth0
 NM_CONTROLLED=no
 ONBOOT=yes
 TYPE=Ethernet
 BOOTPROTO=none
 IPADDR=207.55.16.66
 PREFIX=22
 GATEWAY=207.55.16.1

Not sure if this is related/relevant but I remember reading this bug
about problems if PREFIX is used instead of NETMASK.

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5391
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-10 Thread Alan Batie
We've been running ipv6 for a year or so now, but some of our newer
instances (all on an ESX cluster) are not working.  It looks like it's
all of our Centos 6 instances.  I'm hoping someone can point me in the
right direction...

tshark indicates that it's neighbor discovery that's failing:

centos666.peak.org [26] # cat ../network
NETWORKING=yes
HOSTNAME=centos666.peak.org
GATEWAY=207.55.16.1
NETWORKING_IPV6=yes
IPV6_AUTOTUNNEL=no
IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2607:f678::1

centos666.peak.org [27] # cat ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
BOOTPROTO=none
IPADDR=207.55.16.66
PREFIX=22
GATEWAY=207.55.16.1
DNS1=69.59.192.71
DNS2=69.59.192.72
DOMAIN=peak.org
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6INIT=yes
NAME=System eth0
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
IPV6ADDR=2607:f678::16:66/64
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes

centos666.peak.org [28] # ifconfig
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:56:98:70:8B
  inet addr:207.55.16.66  Bcast:207.55.19.255  Mask:255.255.252.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fe98:708b/64 Scope:Link
  inet6 addr: 2607:f678::16:66/64 Scope:Global
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1862 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:266 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:136703 (133.4 KiB)  TX bytes:33944 (33.1 KiB)

ipv6 is working locally:

centos666.peak.org [29] # ping6 2607:f678::16:66
PING 2607:f678::16:66(2607:f678::16:66) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2607:f678::16:66: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms
64 bytes from 2607:f678::16:66: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms
^C
--- 2607:f678::16:66 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1870ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.038/0.039/0.040/0.001 ms

but not on the lan:

centos666.peak.org [5] # ping6 2607:f678::1
PING 2607:f678::1(2607:f678::1) 56 data bytes
From 2607:f678::16:66 icmp_seq=2 Destination unreachable: Address
unreachable
From 2607:f678::16:66 icmp_seq=3 Destination unreachable: Address
unreachable
From 2607:f678::16:66 icmp_seq=4 Destination unreachable: Address
unreachable
From 2607:f678::16:66 icmp_seq=6 Destination unreachable: Address
unreachable
From 2607:f678::16:66 icmp_seq=7 Destination unreachable: Address
unreachable
From 2607:f678::16:66 icmp_seq=8 Destination unreachable: Address
unreachable
^C
--- 2607:f678::1 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 received, +6 errors, 100% packet loss, time 7892ms


tshark for that ping:

centos666.peak.org [38] # tshark -n -i eth0 ip6
Running as user root and group root. This could be dangerous.
Capturing on eth0
  0.00 2607:f678::16:66 - ff02::1:ff00:1 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
  1.19 2607:f678::16:66 - ff02::1:ff00:1 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
  2.43 2607:f678::16:66 - ff02::1:ff00:1 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
  4.001030 2607:f678::16:66 - ff02::1:ff00:1 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
  5.001076 2607:f678::16:66 - ff02::1:ff00:1 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
  6.001045 2607:f678::16:66 - ff02::1:ff00:1 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
^C6 packets captured


A centos 5.8 vm with the same virtual network connections works fine:

ns6.peak.org [103] # ping6 2607:f678::1
PING 2607:f678::1(2607:f678::1) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2607:f678::1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.34 ms
64 bytes from 2607:f678::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.894 ms
64 bytes from 2607:f678::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.871 ms

--- 2607:f678::1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.871/1.035/1.342/0.219 ms, pipe 2
ns6.peak.org [104] # ping6 ipv6.google.com
PING ipv6.google.com(pz-in-x67.1e100.net) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from pz-in-x67.1e100.net: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=14.1 ms
64 bytes from pz-in-x67.1e100.net: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=14.3 ms
64 bytes from pz-in-x67.1e100.net: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=14.3 ms

--- ipv6.google.com ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 14.185/14.296/14.380/0.081 ms, pipe 2

ns6.peak.org [489] # tshark -i eth0 -n ip6
Running as user root and group root. This could be dangerous.
Capturing on eth0
  0.00 2607:f678::56 - 2607:f678::1 ICMPv6 Echo request
  0.000720 2607:f678::1 - 2607:f678::56 ICMPv6 Echo reply
  1.000990 2607:f678::56 - 2607:f678::1 ICMPv6 Echo request
  1.001759 2607:f678::1 - 2607:f678::56 ICMPv6 Echo reply
  2.001004 2607:f678::56 - 2607:f678::1 ICMPv6 Echo request
  2.001841 2607:f678::1 - 2607:f678::56 ICMPv6 Echo reply
  3.002983 2607:f678::56 - 2607:f678::1 ICMPv6 Echo request
  3.003680 2607:f678::1 - 2607:f678::56 ICMPv6 Echo reply
  4.003991 2607:f678::56 - 2607:f678::1 ICMPv6 Echo request
  4.010478 2607:f678::1 - 2607:f678::56 ICMPv6 Echo reply
  4.650129 2607:f678::1 - 2607:f678::56 ICMPv6 Neighbor solicitation
  4.650171 2607:f678::56 - 2607:f678::1 ICMPv6 Neighbor advertisement
12 packets captured


___
CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-10 Thread Stephen Harris
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
 IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes

Not sure where you get that from.  Instead try adding
  IPV6_DEFAULTDEV=eth0
to /etc/sysconfig/network

FWIW you can see the current routing table with ip -6 route.

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPv6 on Centos 6

2012-08-10 Thread Alan Batie
On 8/10/12 5:50 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 05:24:12PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
 IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
 
 Not sure where you get that from.

That's not something normally in our configs, I think it was in the
default config the centos 6 installer created, and I only stripped out
some of the excess... stuff like that I left in in case it mattered in 6
for some reason...  The config on the working centos 5 systems (which is
what we use on the centos 6 systems also) is much simpler:

ns6.peak.org [113] # cat /etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
NETWORKING_IPV6=yes
HOSTNAME=ns6.peak.org
GATEWAY=207.55.16.1
ns6.peak.org [114] # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=static
BROADCAST=207.55.19.255
IPADDR=207.55.16.53
NETMASK=255.255.252.0
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet

IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6ADDR=2607:f678::56
IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2607:f678::1


 FWIW you can see the current routing table with ip -6 route.

netstat is the one I usually use:

centos666.peak.org [39] # ip -6 router
Object router is unknown, try ip help.
centos666.peak.org [40] # netstat -rn -A inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop
Flags Metric RefUse Iface
2607:f678::/64  ::
U 25610 eth0
fe80::/64   ::
U 25600 eth0
::/02607:f678::1
UG1  50 eth0
::1/128 ::
U 0  11 lo
2607:f678::16:66/128::
U 0  58   1 lo
fe80::250:56ff:fe98:708b/128::
U 0  01 lo
ff00::/8::
U 25600 eth0

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos